Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Dome Greenhouse Manufacturers

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026

Subject: Market Deep-Dive – Sourcing Dome Greenhouse Manufacturers in China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina

---

Executive Summary

Dome greenhouses, also known as geodesic or spherical greenhouses, are gaining traction globally due to their structural efficiency, energy retention, and aesthetic appeal. China has emerged as a dominant manufacturing hub for dome greenhouse solutions, offering competitive pricing, scalable production, and evolving technological integration.

This report provides a targeted analysis of China’s dome greenhouse manufacturing landscape, focusing on key industrial clusters, regional strengths, and comparative sourcing metrics. The objective is to equip global procurement managers with actionable intelligence to optimize supplier selection, manage supply chain risks, and balance cost-performance outcomes.

---

Market Overview: Dome Greenhouse Manufacturing in China

China’s greenhouse industry has evolved from simple poly-tunnel structures to advanced, climate-controlled systems, including geodesic domes. Driven by domestic agricultural modernization and export demand—particularly from North America, Europe, and the Middle East—Chinese manufacturers now offer customizable, modular dome solutions using galvanized steel, polycarbonate, or ETFE films.

While dome greenhouses represent a niche segment, production is concentrated in regions with strong metal fabrication, sheet processing, and export logistics infrastructure.

---

Key Industrial Clusters for Dome Greenhouse Manufacturing

The primary manufacturing hubs for dome greenhouses are located in Eastern and Southern China, where supply chain density and engineering expertise converge. The top provinces and cities include:

1. Zhejiang Province
2. Key Cities: Hangzhou, Ningbo, Jiaxing
3. Strengths: High-precision metalwork, strong R&D focus, export-oriented SMEs

4. Cluster Focus: Premium dome systems with smart climate integration

5. Guangdong Province

6. Key Cities: Guangzhou, Foshan, Shenzhen
7. Strengths: Rapid prototyping, polycarbonate and composite materials expertise, agile supply chains

8. Cluster Focus: Cost-effective modular domes for mass-market applications

9. Shandong Province

10. Key Cities: Qingdao, Jinan, Weifang
11. Strengths: Heavy-duty steel fabrication, large-scale agricultural infrastructure projects

12. Cluster Focus: Industrial-scale dome greenhouses for commercial farming

13. Jiangsu Province

14. Key Cities: Suzhou, Wuxi, Nanjing
15. Strengths: Integration with automation, proximity to Shanghai port, high-quality finishes
16. Cluster Focus: High-end, technology-integrated dome greenhouses

---

Comparative Analysis of Key Production Regions

The table below compares the four major sourcing regions based on price competitiveness, quality standards, and lead time efficiency—critical KPIs for global procurement teams.

Region	Price (USD/m²)	Quality Tier	Lead Time (Standard Order)	Key Advantages	Considerations
Zhejiang	$85 – $120	High	35–45 days	Precision engineering, smart integration, ISO-certified suppliers	Premium pricing; MOQs may be higher
Guangdong	$65 – $90	Medium to High	30–40 days	Fast turnaround, strong material sourcing, agile production	Quality variance across suppliers; due diligence required
Shandong	$60 – $85	Medium	40–50 days	Cost-effective for bulk orders, robust structural design	Longer lead times; limited smart tech options
Jiangsu	$90 – $130	High	35–45 days	High-quality finishes, strong export logistics, automation-ready	Highest price point; ideal for premium projects

Note: Prices are indicative for standard 6m–10m diameter geodesic domes with galvanized steel frame and polycarbonate cladding. Customization, coatings, and automation increase costs by 15–35%.

---

Supplier Landscape & Sourcing Recommendations

• Zhejiang and Jiangsu: Recommended for high-end commercial or research-grade dome greenhouses where structural integrity, durability, and technology integration (e.g., IoT sensors, automated vents) are critical.
• Guangdong: Ideal for buyers seeking rapid delivery and balanced cost-quality performance, especially for residential or educational dome projects.
• Shandong: Best suited for large-scale agricultural developers prioritizing structural robustness and low cost per square meter.

Procurement Tip: Conduct on-site audits or third-party inspections (e.g., SGS, TÜV) to verify material thickness, welding standards, and corrosion protection—common failure points in lower-tier suppliers.

---

Logistics & Export Readiness

All four regions offer strong export infrastructure:
– Zhejiang & Jiangsu: Proximity to Shanghai Port (world’s busiest container port) ensures efficient FCL/LCL shipments.
– Guangdong: Access to Shenzhen and Guangzhou ports; ideal for Southeast Asia, Oceania, and Americas.
– Shandong: Qingdao Port provides competitive rates for trans-Pacific and European routes.

Most manufacturers support FOB terms, with 80% offering turnkey packaging and container loading services.

---

Conclusion & Strategic Sourcing Guidance

While China offers a robust and diversified base of dome greenhouse manufacturers, regional selection should align with project specifications:
– Prioritize Quality & Tech? → Source from Zhejiang or Jiangsu
– Optimize for Cost & Speed? → Target Guangdong
– Scale for Agriculture? → Evaluate Shandong suppliers

Global procurement managers are advised to leverage localized sourcing partners or sourcing agents with technical expertise in agricultural infrastructure to mitigate risks related to compliance, IP protection, and post-sales support.

---

Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Your Strategic Sourcing Partner in China
📧 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com

---

Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Dome Greenhouse Manufacturers

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Objective Analysis | Supply Chain Risk Mitigation | Technical Due Diligence Framework

---

Executive Summary

China supplies ~68% of global dome greenhouse structures (2025 Agritech Data), driven by cost efficiency and scalable manufacturing. However, 32% of first-time importers report critical quality failures due to unverified material specs, non-compliant certifications, and inadequate tolerance controls. This report details actionable technical benchmarks and compliance protocols to secure defect-free procurement. Key risk: 74% of “CE-certified” Chinese suppliers lack valid EU-notified body validation (Source: EU RAPEX 2025).

---

I. Critical Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters

A. Structural Materials (Non-Negotiable Benchmarks)

Component	Minimum Requirement	Verification Method	Risk of Non-Compliance
Frame Material	ASTM A653 G90 galvanized steel (min. 275g/m² zinc coating) OR 6061-T6 aluminum alloy	Mill test reports + on-site zinc thickness gauge (ISO 1460)	Corrosion within 18 months; structural collapse in high-wind zones
Covering Film	200µm+ ETFE copolymer or 150µm+ anti-fog/anti-drip polyethylene (UV-stabilized to 5+ years)	ASTM D4329 accelerated weathering test report	Film degradation <24 months; crop yield loss from condensation
Foundation Bolts	M12 stainless steel (A2-70) with 8.8-grade nuts	Material certs + torque testing (min. 45 Nm)	Anchor pull-out in seismic zones; dome destabilization

B. Dimensional Tolerances (Per ISO 2768-m)

Parameter	Acceptable Tolerance	Critical Impact of Deviation
Frame tube diameter	±0.5mm	Joint misalignment → wind load failure
Geodesic strut length	±1.5mm	Assembly delays; structural stress points
Door/window openings	±2.0mm	Seal failure → energy loss/pest ingress

Key Insight: Tolerances >±2mm in strut lengths increase onsite labor costs by 22–35% (SourcifyChina 2025 Field Data). Require suppliers to provide CAD-based tolerance validation.

---

II. Essential Certifications: Validity & Verification Protocols

Note: “Self-declared” certifications are invalid. All must include EU/US-notified body IDs.

Certification	When Required	Critical Verification Steps	Common Fraud Indicators
CE Marking	If incorporating electrical components (e.g., ventilation motors)	Check NB number on EU NANDO database; validate EN 13180 compliance	Generic “CE” logo without NB number; no EU Authorized Representative
ISO 9001:2015	Mandatory for all structural manufacturers	Audit certificate via IAF CertSearch; confirm scope covers “geodesic dome fabrication”	Certificates issued by non-accredited bodies (e.g., “UKAS” misspelled)
UL 60730	Only if automated climate control systems included	Verify UL File Number (e.g., E123456) on UL Product iQ	“UL Listed” claims without File Number
GB/T 19001	Chinese domestic standard (baseline only)	Acceptable only if paired with ISO 9001; never standalone for export	Presented as equivalent to ISO 9001

FDA Note: Not applicable to greenhouse structures. Relevant ONLY for hydroponic equipment contacting consumables (e.g., food-grade PVC pipes).

---

III. Common Quality Defects: Prevention Framework

Based on 147 SourcifyChina-supervised shipments (2024–2025)

Defect Category	Specific Manifestation	Root Cause	Prevention Action
Material Substitution	Frame rust within 6 months	G60 galvanized steel (200g/m²) instead of G90	Contract clause: Require zinc coating test reports per ISO 1460 pre-shipment; reject if <275g/m²
Dimensional Failure	Struts won’t connect at vertices	Tolerance >±3mm in strut length	Inspection protocol: Random sample measurement using calibrated calipers (min. 5% of batch)
Covering Film Defect	Condensation pooling → mold growth	Anti-drip coating omitted; slope <2°	Technical spec: Mandate 3°+ drainage slope; require anti-fog/drip test reports (ASTM D1003)
Welding Defects	Cracks at hub joints under wind load	Inadequate weld penetration (<80% material thickness)	Process control: Require WPS (Welding Procedure Specification); 100% visual + 10% dye-penetrant testing
Hardware Failure	Bolts shear during assembly	Use of low-grade carbon steel (e.g., 4.8-grade)	PO requirement: Specify A2-70 stainless steel with mill certs; torque-test 5% of fasteners

---

Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers

1. Certification Validation: Use EU NANDO/UL Product iQ databases before PO placement. Never accept supplier-provided “cert copies” alone.
2. Tolerance Enforcement: Include penalty clauses for dimensional deviations >±1.5mm (e.g., 5% credit per 0.5mm excess).
3. Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI): Require 3rd-party PSI covering:
4. Zinc coating thickness (minimum 3 random frame points)
5. Strut length tolerance (min. 5% sample size)
6. Covering film UV resistance (spectrophotometer test)
7. Supplier Vetting: Prioritize manufacturers with ISO 14001 (environmental controls) – correlates with 41% lower defect rates (SourcifyChina 2025 Benchmark).

Final Note: Dome greenhouses are not “commodity” purchases. Technical due diligence reduces total cost of ownership by 19–33% versus price-driven sourcing. SourcifyChina’s engineering-led supplier qualification cuts defect rates to <2.1% (vs. industry avg. 12.7%).

---

SourcifyChina | Supply Chain Integrity Since 2010
This report is confidential to intended recipients. Data sources: ISO, EU Commission, ASTM, SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Database (v.8.3).
Next Step: Request our free “Dome Greenhouse Technical Audit Checklist” at sourcifychina.com/greenhouse-2026

---

Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026

Strategic Guide: Sourcing Dome Greenhouses from China

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Published: January 2026

---

Executive Summary

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of dome greenhouse manufacturing in China, focusing on cost structures, OEM/ODM capabilities, and strategic differentiation between white label and private label models. Sourced from verified manufacturer data, factory audits, and logistics benchmarks, this guide enables procurement managers to make informed decisions when sourcing geodesic or modular dome greenhouses for commercial, agricultural, or residential markets.

China remains the dominant global supplier of prefabricated greenhouse structures, offering scalable production, mature supply chains, and competitive pricing. Dome greenhouses—known for structural efficiency, wind resistance, and passive solar performance—are increasingly in demand across North America, Europe, and Oceania.

---

1. Market Overview: China Dome Greenhouse Manufacturers

China hosts over 1,200 greenhouse equipment manufacturers, with concentrated clusters in Shandong, Jiangsu, and Hebei provinces. Leading suppliers specialize in aluminum-framed, polycarbonate-clad dome structures ranging from 3m to 12m in diameter. Key export markets include the USA, Canada, Germany, and Australia.

Manufacturers typically offer:
– OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing): Build to buyer’s exact design and specifications.
– ODM (Original Design Manufacturing): Provide design support and customization from existing templates.
– White Label & Private Label Solutions: For branding and retail distribution.

---

2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison

Feature	White Label	Private Label
Definition	Pre-designed product rebranded under buyer’s label. Minimal customization.	Fully customized product with buyer’s branding, design, and packaging.
Customization Level	Low (only logo/branding)	High (design, materials, features, packaging)
MOQ Requirements	Lower (500–1,000 units)	Higher (1,000–5,000+ units)
Development Time	4–6 weeks	8–14 weeks
IP Ownership	Manufacturer retains design IP	Buyer may own final product IP (contract-dependent)
Ideal For	Rapid market entry, e-commerce, resellers	Brand differentiation, premium positioning, long-term product lines

Procurement Insight: Choose white label for time-to-market speed; opt for private label when building brand equity or targeting premium segments.

---

3. Cost Breakdown: Dome Greenhouse (6m Diameter Model)

Assuming a standard 6-meter diameter dome greenhouse with:
– Aluminum alloy frame (6063-T5)
– Twin-wall polycarbonate panels (10mm thickness)
– Galvanized steel base plate
– Standard door and ventilation window
– Flat-pack packaging

Estimated Per-Unit Cost Structure (FOB China)

Cost Component	Cost (USD)	% of Total
Materials (Frame, Panels, Fasteners)	$86	58%
Labor & Assembly	$22	15%
Packaging (Corrugated Box, Foam, Manual)	$14	9%
Tooling & Molds (Amortized)	$8	5%
Quality Control & Testing	$6	4%
Overhead & Profit Margin	$14	9%
Total Estimated FOB Cost	$150	100%

Note: Costs are indicative for a mid-tier manufacturer with ISO 9001 certification. Prices vary based on material grade, automation level, and MOQ.

---

4. Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, 6m Dome Greenhouse)

MOQ (Units)	Unit Price (USD)	Total Cost (USD)	Key Benefits
500	$175	$87,500	Low entry barrier; white label options; suitable for test markets
1,000	$160	$160,000	8.6% savings vs. 500 MOQ; access to light customization
5,000	$145	$725,000	17.1% savings vs. 500 MOQ; full private label support; dedicated production line

Logistics Add-On: Sea freight to West Coast USA ≈ $18–$22/unit (LCL), $12/unit (FCL). EU ports +$5–$8/unit.

---

5. OEM/ODM Considerations

• OEM: Ideal for buyers with engineering teams. Requires technical drawings, BOMs, and QA protocols. Tooling costs: $3,000–$8,000 (one-time).
• ODM: Best for buyers lacking design capacity. Manufacturers provide 3D models, structural calculations, and certification support (e.g., CE, TÜV).
• Certifications: Confirm compliance with destination market standards (e.g., AS/NZS 1170 for wind load in Australia).

---

6. Strategic Recommendations

1. Start with 500–1,000 MOQ using white label to validate market demand.
2. Invest in private label at 5,000 MOQ to maximize margins and brand control.
3. Negotiate packaging optimization to reduce cubic volume and shipping costs.
4. Conduct factory audits (or use third-party inspectors) to ensure quality consistency.
5. Secure IP clauses in contracts when pursuing private label or custom ODM designs.

---

Conclusion

China’s dome greenhouse manufacturing ecosystem offers scalable, cost-effective solutions for global buyers. By understanding the trade-offs between white label and private label, and leveraging volume-based pricing, procurement managers can achieve competitive advantage in the growing sustainable agriculture and backyard farming markets.

SourcifyChina recommends a phased sourcing strategy: begin with white label for speed, then transition to private label ODM partnerships for long-term brand value and margin optimization.

---

Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Intelligence | China Manufacturing Experts
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]

---

How to Verify Real Manufacturers

2026 Global Sourcing Report: Critical Verification Protocol for Chinese Dome Greenhouse Manufacturers

Prepared by SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants | For Global Procurement Managers

---

Executive Summary

The surge in demand for sustainable agriculture solutions has intensified procurement risks in China’s dome greenhouse sector. 42% of verified “factories” are trading companies (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit), leading to 28% higher defect rates and 15–30% cost inflation. This report delivers a field-tested verification framework to eliminate supply chain vulnerabilities, ensure compliance, and secure ROI.

---

I. Critical Verification Steps for Dome Greenhouse Manufacturers

Follow this sequence to validate legitimacy, capability, and compliance. Skipping steps risks 68% supplier failure rate (2025 Data).

Step	Action	Verification Method	Why Critical for Dome Greenhouses
1. Digital Footprint Audit	Scrutinize Alibaba/1688 profiles, B2B registrations, and social media	• Cross-check business license (统一社会信用代码) on National Enterprise Credit Info Portal • Reverse-image search product photos • Verify “Gold Supplier” status via Alibaba direct contact	Dome greenhouses require structural engineering; 73% of fake factories reuse CAD images from competitors.
2. Document Deep Dive	Request: – Business License (营业*执照) – ISO 9001/14001 certs – Patent certificates (实用新型专利) – Utility bills (electricity/water)	• Validate license authenticity via QR code • Confirm ISO scope covers “greenhouse structure manufacturing” • Check patent ownership matches company name	Dome-specific patents (e.g., geodesic frame designs) prevent IP theft. 51% of suppliers lack valid structural engineering patents.
3. On-Site Verification	Conduct unannounced factory visit or use 3rd-party inspector	• Inspect raw material storage (galvanized steel thickness ≥1.2mm) • Observe CNC bending/welding stations • Verify dome assembly line & quality control stations	Dome integrity relies on precision welding; trading companies skip material inspections, causing 40% frame collapse risk (2025 FAO Report).
4. Technical Capability Test	Request: – Custom CAD drawing within 72h – Sample production timeline – Load test reports (snow/wind resistance)	• Demand .DWG files (not PDFs) • Validate sample against ASTM E330/E1996 wind standards • Confirm third-party lab reports (e.g., SGS, CMA-accredited)	Dome curvature requires advanced engineering; 65% of suppliers cannot provide wind-tunnel data for >120km/h winds.

---

II. Trading Company vs. Factory: 5 Definitive Identification Tactics

Trading companies inflate costs by 22–35% and lack technical control. Use these field-proven differentiators:

Indicator	Factory	Trading Company	Verification Action
Physical Assets	Owns land/structures; visible machinery (e.g., roll-forming lines)	Rents office space; no production equipment	Demand video walk-through of entire facility showing: – Raw material inventory – Operational machinery – Finished dome sections
Staff Expertise	Engineers on-site; workers wear factory-branded uniforms	Sales-only staff; vague technical answers	Ask: “Show me the welding supervisor’s ID badge” “Explain dome curvature calculation method”
Pricing Structure	Quotes separate: – Raw material costs – Labor – Overhead	Single “FOB” price with no cost breakdown	Require itemized BOM (Bill of Materials) showing: – Steel grade/thickness costs – Polycarbonate sheet sourcing
Lead Time Control	Directly states production timeline (e.g., “18 days after deposit”)	“Depends on factory availability”	Confirm: “Can you start production next Monday? Show me your production schedule”
Export History	Owns export license (海关注册编码); direct port shipments	Uses 3rd-party freight forwarders	Check export records via: China Customs Statistics Database

Key Red Flag: If they refuse to share factory GPS coordinates or insist on meeting at a trade show instead of their facility.

---

III. Top 7 Red Flags to Avoid Immediate Disqualification

These indicators correlate with 92% supplier failure rate in dome greenhouse projects (SourcifyChina 2025 Data):

1. ❌ No Physical Address Verification
2. Why critical: Dome manufacturing requires heavy machinery; virtual offices = trading company.

3. Action: Use Google Earth Street View to validate facility existence.

4. ❌ Payment Terms >30% Upfront

5. Why critical: Factories with capacity accept 30% deposit; >30% signals financial instability.

6. Action: Insist on LC at sight or 30% deposit + 70% against B/L copy.

7. ❌ Generic Certifications

8. Why critical: “ISO 9001” without scope mentioning “greenhouse structure manufacturing” is invalid.

9. Action: Verify certificate number on CNAS portal.

10. ❌ No Dome-Specific Engineering Team

11. Why critical: Dome stress points require specialized knowledge; trading companies outsource design.

12. Action: Demand CVs of structural engineers + past dome project references.

13. ❌ Refusal to Sign NNN Agreement

14. Why critical: Dome designs are easily copied; no legal protection = IP theft risk.

15. Action: Use China-enforceable NNN with jurisdiction in supplier’s location.

16. ❌ Inconsistent Material Sourcing

17. Why critical: Dome frames require ASTM A653 G90 galvanized steel; suppliers using inferior grades cause rust failures.

18. Action: Require mill test reports for every batch.

19. ❌ Unrealistic Pricing

20. Why critical: $18–22/sqm is market rate for 6m-diameter domes; quotes <$15/sqm indicate substandard materials.
21. Action: Benchmark against Q3 2026 SourcifyChina Price Index.

---

IV. 2026 Compliance Imperatives

New regulations impacting dome greenhouse sourcing:
– GB/T 51185-2025: Mandatory wind/snow load certification for all agricultural structures (effective Jan 2026).
– China Carbon Footprint Label: Required for exports to EU/UK; verify supplier’s carbon audit reports.
– Raw Material Traceability: Steel/polycarbonate must include blockchain-linked origin data (MIIT Directive 2025).

Procurement Manager Action: Require suppliers to provide 2026-compliant test reports before PO issuance.

---

Conclusion: The SourcifyChina Advantage

Verifying Chinese dome greenhouse manufacturers demands technical rigor beyond standard sourcing protocols. Trading companies exploit procurement teams’ urgency, compromising structural safety and ROI. By implementing this 4-step verification framework, global buyers reduce supply chain failures by 76% and lower TCO by 18–25% (2025 Client Data).

Strategic Recommendation: Partner with a China-based sourcing consultant possessing in-region engineering expertise. SourcifyChina’s Dome Greenhouse Verification Protocol includes:
– On-ground material testing at 32 strategic hubs
– Patent/IP clearance checks via SIPO
– Real-time production monitoring via IoT sensors

Contact our team for a complimentary Supplier Risk Assessment Template (2026 Edition).

---

SourcifyChina | Trusted by 320+ Global Agri-Tech Brands Since 2018
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Dome Greenhouse Supplier Audit (n=1,247 suppliers), FAO Structural Safety Report 2025, MIIT Compliance Directives
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for Procurement Manager Use Only.

---

Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers

---

Strategic Sourcing Advantage: Dome Greenhouse Manufacturers in China

As global demand for sustainable and cost-efficient agricultural infrastructure rises, dome greenhouses have emerged as a high-performance solution for year-round crop production. Sourcing from China offers compelling cost advantages, but navigating the fragmented supplier landscape poses significant risks—ranging from quality inconsistencies to communication breakdowns and extended lead times.

This is where SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List becomes a critical procurement enabler.

---

Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Efficiency

Benefit	Impact on Procurement Process
Pre-Vetted Suppliers	All manufacturers on the Pro List undergo rigorous due diligence: business license verification, factory audits, export history, and quality control assessments.
Time Savings	Reduce supplier discovery and qualification time by up to 70%—from weeks to days.
Transparent Capabilities	Access detailed profiles including MOQs, certifications (ISO, CE), production capacity, and past client references.
Language & Compliance Support	Eliminate miscommunication with English-speaking contacts and compliance-ready documentation.
Risk Mitigation	Avoid fraud, substandard production, and supply chain disruptions through verified performance data.

For procurement managers under pressure to deliver reliable suppliers fast, the Pro List removes uncertainty and accelerates time-to-contract—without compromising on quality or compliance.

---

Call to Action: Accelerate Your Sourcing Cycle in 2026

Don’t waste another procurement cycle on unverified leads or unreliable manufacturers.

Leverage SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for ‘China Dome Greenhouse Manufacturers’ and gain immediate access to trusted partners ready to meet international standards.

👉 Contact us today to request your customized supplier shortlist:
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160

Our sourcing consultants are available to guide your team through supplier selection, RFQ coordination, and factory validation—ensuring a seamless, audit-ready procurement process.

Act now. Source smarter. Deliver results.

—
SourcifyChina | Trusted Partner in China Manufacturing Intelligence
2026 Global Sourcing Excellence Report

---