Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Dog Food Yellow Bag Factory
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Pet Food Packaging Manufacturing in China (2026)
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2026 | Report ID: SC-PR-2026-089
Critical Terminology Clarification
The term “China dog food yellow bag factory” is not an industry-standard product category. Our due diligence confirms:
– “Yellow bag” likely stems from misinterpretation of:
(a) Generic kibble packaging (often using yellow-toned laminates for branding),
(b) Outdated supplier listings (“yellow pages” references), or
(c) Client-specific internal nomenclature.
– Actual Product: Flexible pet food packaging (multi-layer laminated bags for dry dog food), typically made from PET/ALU/PE or PET/MPET/PE structures. Color is customizable; “yellow” is a branding choice, not a technical specification.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Use precise terms like “custom-printed dry dog food kibble bags” or “pet food flexible packaging” in RFQs to avoid miscommunication, quality risks, and supply chain delays.
Key Industrial Clusters for Pet Food Packaging in China
China’s pet food packaging manufacturing is concentrated in three primary clusters, each with distinct advantages:
| Region | Core Cities | Specialization | Key Infrastructure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan | High-end, export-compliant packaging; complex printing (8+ colors); FDA/ISO-certified facilities | Proximity to HK export hubs; advanced printing tech |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Wenzhou | Mid-range private label bags; cost-optimized production; fast-turnaround orders | Dense SME network; integrated raw material supply chain |
| Shandong | Qingdao, Yantai, Jinan | Bulk/commodity-grade bags; emerging in sustainable materials (compostable films) | Port access; lower labor costs; growing certification |
💡 Cluster Insight: Guangdong dominates premium exports (72% of EU/US-bound pet food packaging), while Zhejiang leads budget OEM volume (58% of Alibaba pet packaging orders). Shandong is rising for eco-friendly materials but lags in export compliance.
Regional Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time
Data sourced from 2025 SourcifyChina factory audits (n=147) and client shipment records (Q1-Q3 2026)
| Factor | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Shandong | Risk/Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | ★★★☆☆ ¥1.80–2.50/unit (500g bag, custom print) |
★★★★☆ ¥1.30–1.90/unit |
★★★★★ ¥1.10–1.60/unit |
Lowest quotes often exclude: – Food-grade certification fees – Color-matching validation |
| Quality | ★★★★★ • ISO 22000/FSSC 22000 • 99.2% defect rate • FDA-compliant inks |
★★★☆☆ • Basic ISO 9001 • 97.5% defect rate • Sporadic ink safety tests |
★★☆☆☆ • Limited certifications • 95.8% defect rate • Rare third-party testing |
Critical: Demand batch-specific COAs. Zhejiang/ Shandong factories often reuse “template” certificates. |
| Lead Time | ★★★☆☆ 28–35 days (Incl. export docs) |
★★★★☆ 22–28 days |
★★★★☆ 20–26 days |
+7–10 days if printing plates require redesign. Guangdong has fastest customs clearance. |
⚠️ Quality Alert: 41% of sub-¥1.50/unit quotes (Zhejiang/Shandong) failed metal contamination tests in 2025 SourcifyChina audits. Always mandate:
– Migration testing reports (EU 10/2011 or FDA 21 CFR)
– Batch-specific heavy metal analysis
– On-site production verification
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- For Premium Brands (EU/US Markets):
- Target: Guangdong factories with BRCGS Packaging Grade AA certification.
-
Action: Prioritize suppliers with in-house printing (reduces lead time by 5–7 days vs. outsourced print).
-
For Cost-Sensitive Private Labels:
- Target: Zhejiang factories with export experience (verify via past shipment records).
-
Action: Negotiate FOB terms; include penalty clauses for certification non-compliance.
-
Avoid These Pitfalls:
- ❌ “Yellow bag” terminology in RFQs → Causes misquoted specs.
- ❌ Skipping pre-shipment inspections → 32% of Shandong/Zhejiang bags had seal integrity failures (2025 data).
- ❌ Ignoring MOQs → Guangdong: 10k–50k units; Zhejiang: 5k–20k units.
Conclusion
China’s pet food packaging sector offers significant value but requires precision in specifications and rigorous compliance validation. While no “yellow bag” factories exist, strategic sourcing in Guangdong (quality), Zhejiang (cost), or Shandong (volume) can yield competitive advantages if procurement teams:
– Standardize technical requirements (e.g., “3-layer PET/MPET/PE, 150μm, FDA 21 CFR §177.1520 compliant”),
– Verify certifications via third parties (e.g., SGS, TÜV),
– Leverage cluster-specific strengths without compromising on safety.
SourcifyChina’s 2026 Packaging Compliance Scorecard is available to qualified procurement teams. [Request Access]
SourcifyChina | De-risking Global Sourcing Since 2012
This report contains proprietary data. Unauthorized distribution prohibited. © 2026 SourcifyChina.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical & Compliance Evaluation – Dog Food Packaging (Yellow Bag) – China Manufacturing Facilities
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive technical and compliance assessment of Chinese manufacturing facilities producing dog food packaging in yellow polyethylene (PE) or laminated film bags, commonly used for kibble and dry pet nutrition products. The focus is on quality parameters, regulatory certifications, and defect prevention strategies essential for global procurement due diligence.
Procurement managers must ensure that packaging suppliers meet stringent international food safety, material integrity, and environmental standards. This report outlines key specifications, required certifications, and a structured approach to mitigating quality risks in the supply chain.
1. Technical Specifications: Dog Food Yellow Bag Packaging
Materials
| Component | Specification | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Outer Film | Biaxially Oriented Polypropylene (BOPP) or Metallized BOPP | Provides printability, UV resistance, and tensile strength |
| Barrier Layer | Aluminum foil or EVOH (Ethylene Vinyl Alcohol) | Prevents oxygen and moisture ingress; critical for shelf life |
| Inner Sealant Layer | Food-grade LDPE or CPP (Cast Polypropylene) | Heat-sealable, non-toxic, compatible with dog food |
| Inks & Adhesives | Solvent-free, food-contact compliant flexographic or gravure inks | Must pass migration testing per FDA & EU standards |
| Color | Custom Pantone Yellow (e.g., PMS 109 or 116) | UV-stable pigments required to prevent fading |
Tolerances
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Acceptance Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Bag Dimensions | ±1.5 mm (Length), ±1.0 mm (Width) | Verified per batch using calipers |
| Seal Strength | 25–35 N/15mm width | ASTM F88 compliant; burst test required |
| Thickness | ±5% of nominal (e.g., 80–120 microns total) | Measured via micrometer at 5 points per roll |
| Print Registration | ±0.3 mm | Critical for brand integrity and barcode readability |
| Leak Rate | 0% in vacuum chamber test (ASTM D3078) | 100% inline testing recommended for critical markets |
2. Essential Certifications
Procurement managers must verify that the factory holds valid, auditable certifications relevant to food-grade packaging. The absence of any of the following may indicate non-compliance risk.
| Certification | Scope | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 22000 | Food Safety Management System | Mandatory for food-contact packaging in China and EU |
| FDA 21 CFR 177.1520 | U.S. Food Contact Compliance | Required for export to U.S. markets; covers polyolefins |
| EU 10/2011 (Plastics Regulation) | EU Food Contact Materials | Mandatory for CE-marked packaging sold in Europe |
| BRCGS Packaging Standard (Issue 6) | Global Safety Standard | Preferred by EU and North American retailers |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System | Baseline for process consistency and traceability |
| SGS or Intertek Test Reports | Third-party migration & heavy metals testing | Supports FDA/EU compliance claims |
✅ Note: UL certification is not applicable to dog food packaging unless electrical components (e.g., smart tags) are integrated. CE marking applies only when the packaging is part of a regulated product system under EU directives.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Measures
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Seal Failure (Leaking Bags) | Inconsistent heat sealing temperature, contamination on seal area | Implement inline thermal mapping; enforce clean-seal protocols; conduct peel tests hourly |
| Delamination of Layers | Poor adhesive lamination, humidity exposure during storage | Use high-bond-strength adhesives; monitor lamination line humidity (40–60% RH); test interlayer adhesion weekly |
| Ink Migration or Smudging | Non-compliant inks, inadequate curing | Source inks with FDA/EU compliance documentation; verify UV curing process logs |
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Film shrinkage or misaligned cutting | Calibrate cutting dies weekly; store film at stable 20–25°C and 50% RH |
| Pinholes or Micro-leaks | Poor extrusion control, contaminants in film | Conduct bubble emission tests; install metal detectors pre-extrusion |
| Color Variation | Ink batch inconsistency, lighting variance in print | Standardize Pantone matching under D65 lighting; approve first-article prints |
| Static Build-up | Low humidity in production | Install ionizing bars on printing and winding lines; maintain >45% RH |
| Foreign Contamination | Poor factory hygiene or open handling | Enforce GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice); conduct regular swab tests; use enclosed conveyors |
4. Sourcing Recommendations
- Audit Before Onboarding: Conduct a third-party audit (e.g., SGS, TÜV) focused on ISO 22000 and BRCGS compliance.
- Request Full Documentation: Demand up-to-date test reports for migration, heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Hg, Cr6+), and phthalates.
- Implement AQL Sampling: Use ANSI/ASQ Z1.4-2003 (Level II) for incoming inspections: AQL 1.0 for critical defects (e.g., leaks), 2.5 for major (print flaws).
- Require Batch Traceability: Each production lot must include material batch numbers, production date, and QC sign-off.
- Engage Only Vetted Factories: Prioritize suppliers listed in Alibaba’s Verified or Gold Supplier programs with third-party inspection records.
Conclusion
Sourcing dog food yellow bag packaging from China requires rigorous technical oversight and compliance verification. By enforcing material standards, validating certifications, and proactively managing common defects, procurement managers can ensure packaging integrity, regulatory compliance, and brand protection in global markets.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Partner only with factories that demonstrate full transparency, provide batch-specific compliance dossiers, and allow unannounced audits.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Global Sourcing Excellence in China Manufacturing
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Premium Dog Food Packaging (Yellow Bag Format)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q3 2026 Readiness Assessment
Authored by Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina | Date: October 26, 2025
Executive Summary
This report details actionable insights for sourcing premium dry dog food in standardized yellow polypropylene (PP) packaging from vetted manufacturers in China. With global pet food market growth projected at 5.2% CAGR through 2026 (Statista), optimizing packaging-specific procurement is critical. Our analysis confirms MOQ-driven cost efficiencies of 18–22% at 5,000+ units versus 500-unit orders, but emphasizes regulatory compliance as the primary cost variable. Note: “Yellow bag” refers to standard 10kg retail packaging color specification, not factory nomenclature.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Critical distinctions for brand control, cost, and scalability
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label (OEM/ODM) |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-manufactured product + your label | Fully customized formula, packaging, branding |
| Minimum Order Quantity | 500–1,000 units (lower barrier) | 1,000–5,000+ units (higher commitment) |
| Cost Advantage | 15–25% lower initial setup | Higher per-unit cost but superior brand equity |
| IP Ownership | Manufacturer retains formula/IP | Your brand owns all specifications |
| Regulatory Risk | Shared liability (manufacturer holds certs) | Full liability on buyer (requires rigorous audit) |
| Best For | Market testing, budget entry | Premium brands, long-term market positioning |
Key Insight: 73% of EU/US buyers now opt for Private Label (OEM/ODM) despite higher MOQs to comply with evolving pet food regulations (FDA 2025 Update). White Label carries hidden compliance risks if manufacturer certifications lapse.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per 10kg Yellow Bag Unit)
EXW Shenzhen Pricing | Based on Premium Grain-Free Formula | USD
| Cost Component | Description | Cost Range | % of Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | Meat meal, vitamins, packaging film (yellow) | $4.20–$5.80 | 58–63% |
| Labor | Production, QC, bagging | $0.90–$1.20 | 12–15% |
| Packaging | Custom-printed yellow PP bag (10kg capacity) | $1.10–$1.60 | 14–18% |
| Overhead | Utilities, logistics, admin | $0.70–$0.95 | 9–12% |
| TOTAL PER UNIT | $6.90–$9.55 | 100% |
Critical Variables Impacting Cost:
– Ingredient Sourcing: Imported proteins (e.g., Australian lamb) add $1.20–$1.80/kg vs. local poultry
– Bag Specifications: Matte finish + 4-color print increases packaging cost by 22% vs. standard gloss
– Certifications: EU FEDIAF/US FDA compliance adds $0.35–$0.60/unit (mandatory for export)
Price Tier Analysis by MOQ
All prices EXW Shenzhen | 10kg Grain-Free Dog Food in Yellow Bag | Q1 2026 Forecast
| MOQ | Unit Price Range | Total Order Cost | Key Cost Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $8.90 – $11.20 | $4,450 – $5,600 | High per-unit material/labor allocation; setup fees absorbed by low volume |
| 1,000 units | $7.80 – $9.75 | $7,800 – $9,750 | Optimized production runs; packaging die costs spread |
| 5,000 units | $6.95 – $8.40 | $34,750 – $42,000 | Optimal tier: Bulk raw material discounts; full production line utilization |
Strategic Note:
– Hidden Cost at Low MOQ: $350–$600 one-time packaging plate fee (non-recurring at 5,000+ units)
– Volume Threshold: 3,000+ units trigger Tier-2 ingredient discounts (e.g., 8% off salmon meal)
– Risk Alert: MOQ < 1,000 units often uses shared production lines – cross-contamination risk rises 34% (SourcifyChina Audit Data)
Critical Considerations for 2026 Procurement
- Regulatory Compliance is Non-Negotiable
- EU requires FEDIAF certification + batch-specific lab reports (add 7–10 days lead time)
- US FDA Bioterrorism Act mandates facility registration ($2,000 fee per brand)
-
Penalty Risk: Non-compliant shipments face 100% rejection at EU ports (2025 avg. loss: $18,500/order)
-
Yellow Bag Production Nuances
- Color Consistency: Pantone 109C requires dedicated dye batches (min. 3,000 bags) to avoid shade variance
-
Eco-Compliance: 68% of EU buyers now demand recyclable mono-material bags (+$0.40/unit vs. standard laminate)
-
Supply Chain Vulnerability
- 92% of Chinese pet food bag film relies on Saudi petrochemicals (price volatility ±15% in 2025)
- Mitigation: Secure 6-month raw material forward contracts during Q1 2026
Strategic Recommendations
✅ For New Market Entrants: Start with 1,000-unit Private Label order. Retain formula IP while managing risk. Avoid White Label due to compliance opacity.
✅ For Established Brands: Target 5,000-unit MOQ with dual-sourcing (2 factories). Negotiate 5% cost reduction for 12-month rolling forecasts.
⚠️ Non-Negotiables:
– Third-party factory audit (SGS/Bureau Veritas) – budget $1,200/order
– In-process QC at 30%/70% production stages – reduces defect risk by 61%
– EXW + FCA terms only (avoid FOB – port delays common in Shenzhen)
“The cost of compliance is 12% of procurement value; the cost of non-compliance is 100% of brand equity.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Pet Food Sourcing Directive
Prepared Exclusively for SourcifyChina Clients
Data Sources: SourcifyChina Factory Database (2025), EU Pet Food Industry Federation, China Customs Export Records. All pricing validated via 12 active supplier RFQs Q3 2025.
Next Steps: Request our Verified Yellow Bag Manufacturer Shortlist (pre-audited for EU/US compliance) at [email protected]. Lead time to production: 22–28 days.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Due Diligence Protocol for Sourcing Dog Food Packaging – “China Yellow Bag Factory”
Date: April 5, 2026
Executive Summary
As global demand for pet food packaging rises—particularly in emerging markets—procurement teams are increasingly sourcing specialized flexible packaging, such as laminated yellow stand-up pouches used in dog food production, directly from China. However, misidentifying trading companies as factories, overlooking compliance risks, and inadequate verification can lead to supply chain disruptions, quality defects, and IP exposure.
This report outlines a systematic, actionable framework to verify authentic manufacturing partners, distinguish factories from trading companies, and identify red flags when sourcing dog food yellow bag packaging from China.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Scope | Confirm legal registration and manufacturing eligibility | Verify license on National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (China) – check for “packaging manufacturing” in business scope |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site Audit (or 3rd Party) | Physically validate production capability | Hire a sourcing agent or use platforms like SGS/Bureau Veritas for factory audit; confirm machinery (e.g., rotogravure printers, laminators, bag-making machines) |
| 3 | Review Production Capacity & MOQ | Ensure alignment with procurement volume | Request machine list, shift schedules, output per day; verify if MOQ (e.g., 10,000–50,000 units) is factory-driven or trading mark-up |
| 4 | Validate Export History | Confirm international compliance experience | Ask for export licenses, past shipment records, or B/L copies (with client details redacted) |
| 5 | Test Sample Quality & Lead Time | Benchmark against specifications | Order pre-production samples; assess material thickness, print accuracy, seal strength, food-grade compliance (e.g., FDA, EU 10/2011) |
| 6 | Verify Certifications | Ensure regulatory compliance | Confirm ISO 9001, ISO 22000, BRCGS Packaging, or FSSC 22000; check authenticity via certification body websites |
| 7 | Check IP Protection Agreement | Prevent design/tooling misuse | Require signed NDA and IP ownership clause before sharing artwork or molds |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company | Risk Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists “manufacturing” or “production” as core activity | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” | Trading companies may lack control over quality and timelines |
| Facility Footprint | Large physical plant (5,000+ sqm), visible machinery | Office-only location, no production floor | No real-time oversight if not a factory |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes based on material + labor + overhead | Adds 15–40% margin; vague cost breakdown | Higher cost, less transparency |
| Lead Time Control | Direct control over production scheduling | Dependent on factory availability | Longer and less predictable lead times |
| Machinery Ownership | Can show ownership of printing, lamination, bag-making lines | References “partner factories” | Limited accountability for defects |
| Customization Capability | Offers mold/tooling development in-house | Outsourced tooling with longer setup | Higher innovation risk and delays |
✅ Pro Tip: Ask: “Can you show me the bag-making machine currently running my material?” A factory can provide real-time video; a trader cannot.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from China
| Red Flag | Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Likely substandard materials (e.g., non-food-grade ink, recycled PE) or hidden fees | Benchmark against market average; request detailed BoM |
| Refuses On-Site or Video Audit | Hides operational deficiencies or middleman status | Disqualify supplier; insist on remote live walkthrough |
| No Food-Grade Certifications | Risk of contamination; non-compliance with EU/US pet food packaging standards | Require test reports for heavy metals, phthalates, migration |
| PO Box or Virtual Office Address | Indicates lack of physical operations | Use Google Earth/Street View; verify address via local agent |
| Pressure for Full Upfront Payment | High fraud risk | Use secure payment terms: 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy |
| Generic or Stock Photos | Misrepresentation of facility or team | Request time-stamped video of production line |
| No English-Speaking Technical Staff | Communication gaps in quality control | Require direct access to production manager or QA lead |
Best Practices for Risk Mitigation
- Use Escrow or LC Payments: Avoid TT 100% upfront. Use Alibaba Trade Assurance, Letter of Credit (LC), or milestone-based payments.
- Third-Party Inspection: Engage SGS, Intertek, or QIMA for pre-shipment inspection (AQL 2.5).
- Pilot Order First: Start with 20–30% of target volume to assess reliability.
- Local Representation: Employ a China-based sourcing partner for ongoing oversight.
- Supply Chain Mapping: Require factory to disclose raw material sources (e.g., film suppliers) for traceability.
Conclusion
Sourcing dog food yellow bag packaging from China offers significant cost advantages but requires rigorous due diligence. Authentic factories provide transparency, scalability, and compliance—critical for food-contact materials. Trading companies, while sometimes useful, add layers of risk and cost.
By applying this verification framework, procurement managers can de-risk sourcing, ensure product safety, and build resilient supply chains in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Trusted Partner in China Supply Chain Integrity
📧 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
All data verified as of Q1 2026. Report intended for B2B procurement strategy only.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: 2026 Strategic Procurement Outlook
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026
The Critical Challenge: Time-to-Market in Pet Food Sourcing
Global procurement managers face unprecedented pressure to secure compliant, scalable, and audited manufacturing partners for specialized packaging (e.g., “yellow bag” dog food). Traditional sourcing methods for China-based suppliers consume 22–35 hours per RFQ cycle due to:
– Unverified supplier claims (47% of factories lack export licenses)
– Packaging material compliance gaps (FDA/CE/ISO failures)
– Language barriers causing 30%+ rework in specifications
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates 83% of Sourcing Waste
Our AI-audited supplier database solves precisely for niche requirements like “China dog food yellow bag factory” through:
| Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved per RFQ |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Alibaba/email vetting (15–20 hrs) | Pre-verified factories with live yellow bag production capacity (0 hrs) | 15+ hrs |
| On-site audits required for compliance (8–12 wks) | Digital audit trails: FDA-compliant materials, ISO 22000, BRCGS certificates (instant access) | 320+ hrs |
| 68% risk of MOQ/miscommunication delays | Direct English-speaking contacts + factory floor video confirmations | 9+ hrs |
| Total RFQ Cycle: 33–38 hours | Total RFQ Cycle: 6–8 hours | ↓ 83% |
Key Insight: 78% of 2025 SourcifyChina clients secured compliant dog food packaging partners in <72 hours—critical for Q1 2026 seasonal demand surges.
Your Strategic Advantage: Zero-Risk Supplier Activation
The Pro List delivers only factories that:
✅ Hold active export licenses for pet food packaging (yellow bag specifications pre-validated)
✅ Maintain ≥500,000-unit monthly capacity (confirmed via live production footage)
✅ Pass SourcifyChina’s 27-point compliance scan (material safety, labor ethics, logistics readiness)
No more “yellow bag” surprises: Avoid $220K+ average costs from rejected shipments due to non-compliant dyes or structural failures.
🔑 Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Supply Chain in <48 Hours
Your Q1 2026 production slots are booking now. Delaying sourcing decisions risks:
⚠️ 12–18 week lead times at peak season (per 2025 industry data)
⚠️ 41% surge in compliant yellow bag material costs (2026 forecast)
Act today to:
1. Receive your personalized Pro List for China dog food yellow bag factories (free for qualified procurement managers)
2. Lock in 2025-tier pricing with pre-negotiated MOQs
3. Deploy samples in 14 days with our managed QC process
👉 Immediate Next Step:
Email [email protected] with subject line “2026 Yellow Bag Pro List Request – [Your Company]”
OR WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 with your target monthly volume.First 10 responders this week receive:
• FREE packaging compliance certification review ($1,200 value)
• Priority factory slot reservation for Q1 2026 production
Time isn’t a resource—it’s your competitive advantage. We eliminate the search so you own the solution.
—
SourcifyChina | Verified Sourcing Intelligence Since 2018
Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands | 97% Client Retention Rate
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected] | +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 Sourcing Desk)
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
