Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Disposable Vinyl Gloves Factory
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Disposable Vinyl Gloves from China
Date: January 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
The global demand for disposable vinyl gloves remains resilient across healthcare, food service, and industrial sectors. China continues to dominate global supply, accounting for over 60% of manufactured disposable gloves. While nitrile and latex gloves have gained traction due to performance and allergy concerns, vinyl gloves retain a strong market share in low-risk applications due to cost-efficiency and ease of production.
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the Chinese manufacturing landscape for disposable vinyl gloves, focusing on key industrial clusters, regional strengths, and comparative sourcing metrics. The insights are tailored for procurement professionals seeking reliable, scalable, and compliant supply chains from China in 2026.
Key Industrial Clusters for Disposable Vinyl Gloves in China
China’s disposable vinyl glove production is concentrated in coastal provinces with established medical supply and polymer processing ecosystems. The following regions are recognized as primary manufacturing hubs:
1. Guangdong Province (Dongguan, Shenzhen, Guangzhou)
- Overview: The largest and most mature cluster for medical disposables in China.
- Advantages: Proximity to ports (Shenzhen, Nansha), strong supply chain for PVC resins, advanced automation, and high export compliance standards.
- Key Factories: Numerous ISO 13485 and FDA-registered manufacturers; many offer OEM/ODM services.
2. Zhejiang Province (Ningbo, Hangzhou, Taizhou)
- Overview: A rapidly growing hub with a focus on cost-effective production.
- Advantages: Strong industrial base in plastics and packaging; competitive labor and overhead costs.
- Key Factories: Mid-tier suppliers with improving quality control; many are expanding into medical-grade certification.
3. Jiangsu Province (Suzhou, Changzhou)
- Overview: High-tech manufacturing corridor; smaller but technically advanced producers.
- Advantages: Access to skilled labor and R&D support; strong logistics via Shanghai port.
- Key Factories: Fewer dedicated vinyl glove lines; often produce multi-product lines (nitrile, PE, vinyl).
4. Shandong Province (Qingdao, Weifang)
- Overview: Emerging player with large-scale chemical and polymer infrastructure.
- Advantages: Lower production costs; access to raw materials (PVC, plasticizers).
- Key Factories: Larger factories with vertical integration; increasing focus on export compliance.
Comparative Regional Analysis: Disposable Vinyl Glove Sourcing (2026)
| Region | Average FOB Price (USD/Box, 100 pcs) | Quality Tier | Lead Time (Production + Shipment) | Key Strengths | Key Risks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $1.80 – $2.40 | High | 25–35 days | FDA/CE-certified suppliers, consistent quality, fast logistics | Higher pricing vs. inland regions |
| Zhejiang | $1.50 – $2.00 | Medium to High | 30–40 days | Competitive pricing, scalable capacity, improving compliance | Variable quality among smaller suppliers |
| Jiangsu | $1.70 – $2.30 | High | 30–35 days | Technical expertise, integration with medtech OEMs | Limited volume capacity for vinyl |
| Shandong | $1.40 – $1.90 | Medium | 35–45 days | Low-cost production, raw material access | Longer lead times; fewer certified suppliers |
Note: Prices based on bulk orders (≥100,000 boxes). Lead times include production (10–14 days), inland logistics, customs clearance, and sea freight to West Coast USA (transit: 14–21 days).
Market Trends & Strategic Recommendations (2026)
1. Regulatory Compliance is Non-Negotiable
- Ensure suppliers hold ISO 13485, FDA Listing, and CE MDR certifications.
- Verify compliance with REACH and RoHS standards for phthalates (e.g., DEHP-free formulations).
2. Shift Toward Low-Phthalate & Eco-Friendly Vinyl
- Rising demand for non-DEHP plasticizers (e.g., DINCH, DOTP) in EU and North America.
- Proactive sourcing from factories investing in eco-compliant formulations mitigates future regulatory risk.
3. Dual Sourcing Strategy Recommended
- Guangdong for high-compliance, fast-turnover needs.
- Zhejiang/Shandong for cost-optimized volume procurement with rigorous QC audits.
4. Logistics Optimization
- Use Ningbo and Shenzhen ports for faster container availability.
- Consider consolidated LCL shipments for trial orders from Zhejiang and Shandong.
Conclusion
China remains the most strategic source for disposable vinyl gloves in 2026, with Guangdong leading in quality and compliance, and Zhejiang and Shandong offering compelling cost advantages. Procurement managers should prioritize supplier vetting, certification validation, and regional diversification to balance cost, quality, and supply chain resilience.
SourcifyChina recommends initiating on-site audits and sample testing with shortlisted manufacturers in these clusters to ensure alignment with corporate sourcing standards.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Empowering Global Procurement with Transparent, Compliant China Sourcing
📩 Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Disposable Vinyl Gloves from China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Objective Analysis Based on 15+ Years of China Sourcing Experience | Compliance-Driven Sourcing Framework
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global supplier of disposable vinyl gloves (PVC), accounting for ~65% of export volume. However, regulatory tightening (EU MDR, FDA 510(k) updates), material volatility, and quality inconsistency require rigorous vendor qualification. Critical Note: Vinyl gloves face phase-out in EU healthcare (REACH Annex XVII) but retain demand in food service, janitorial, and light industrial segments. Procurement strategies must prioritize traceable compliance and defect prevention protocols over lowest price.
Technical Specifications: Critical Quality Parameters
Aligned with ISO 11193, ASTM D3578-20, and EN 455 Series
| Parameter | Standard Requirement | Tolerance | Verification Method | Sourcing Risk Mitigation Tip |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Material Composition | Virgin PVC resin (≥99.5%), Non-phthalate plasticizers (e.g., DINCH, DEHT), Powder-free or cornstarch (≤2mg/g) | ±0.3% plasticizer content | GC-MS/FTIR Spectroscopy | Require batch-specific CoA; Ban DEHP/DINP explicitly in PO |
| Thickness | Palm: 0.06–0.08mm; Fingertip: ≥0.08mm | ±0.01mm | Micrometer (ISO 2859-1 AQL 1.0) | Audit factory’s in-line laser gauging system; Reject vendors using manual calipers only |
| Tensile Strength | ≥14 MPa (ASTM D412) | ±1.5 MPa | Universal Testing Machine | Test aged samples (7 days @ 50°C) to simulate shipping |
| Elongation at Break | ≥500% | ±40% | Universal Testing Machine | Verify test at 500mm/min speed (per ISO 37) |
| Powder Residue | ≤2.0 mg/dm² (food-grade gloves) | N/A | Gravimetric analysis (EN 455-3) | Mandate powder-free for medical use; Specify USP <87> for cytotoxicity |
Strategic Note: Vinyl gloves inherently lack the chemical resistance of nitrile. Explicitly define end-use (e.g., “food handling only – no chemical exposure”) in contracts to avoid liability.
Essential Certifications & Compliance Requirements
Non-negotiable for market access; Verify via official portals
| Certification | Scope | Validity | Verification Method | Critical Risk Warning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDA 510(k) | US market (Class I device) | 5 years | FDA Database Search (K Number) + Facility Inspection | 78% of Chinese “FDA-approved” claims in 2025 were fraudulent; Demand K Number |
| CE Marking | EU market (MDR 2017/745) | 5 years | EUDAMED + Notified Body Certificate (e.g., TÜV) | Vinyl gloves require Class I SR under MDR; Self-declared CE = non-compliant |
| ISO 13485 | QMS for medical devices | 3 years | Certificate + Scope Audit Report | Confirm scope explicitly covers “disposable gloves” |
| REACH SVHC | EU chemical safety | Ongoing | Full Material Disclosure (FMD) + SGS Report | DEHP banned; Monitor updates for new SVHCs (e.g., DINP) |
| California Prop 65 | US state requirement | Annual | Supplier’s compliance statement + Testing | Requires explicit warning label if >0.001% phthalates |
Verification Protocol:
1. Cross-check certificates on official databases (FDA, EUDAMED)
2. Demand batch-specific CoAs for every shipment
3. Conduct unannounced factory audits (focus: lab testing capability)
Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Data sourced from 2025 SourcifyChina Quality Audit Database (127 Chinese factories)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Factories | Prevention Protocol | Verification Action for Procurement Managers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inconsistent Thickness | Worn extrusion dies; Poor temperature control | • Calibrate dies daily • Implement real-time laser monitoring with auto-shutdown |
Audit: Review calibration logs; Pull 50 gloves/lot for thickness mapping |
| Powder Clumping | High humidity storage; Excessive powder application | • Store powder in <40% RH climate • Use electrostatic coating (not tumbling) |
Reject if powder forms >3mm agglomerates in glove interior |
| Tear During Donning | Low molecular weight PVC; Inadequate plasticizer | • Source resin with MW >50,000 Da • Maintain plasticizer:resin ratio 32:68 |
Conduct wet donning test (ASTM D5250) with 10 testers per batch |
| Residual Monomer (VCM) | Incomplete polymerization | • Extend curing time to 45+ mins @ 160°C • Install inline GC for VCM detection |
Require <1ppm VCM in CoA (per USP <467>) |
| Discoloration (Yellowing) | Antioxidant degradation; UV exposure during storage | • Use hindered phenol antioxidants • Store in UV-blocking containers |
Reject gloves with ΔE >2.0 (vs. master sample) via spectrophotometer |
Key Procurement Recommendations for 2026
- Phase-Out Strategy: Audit usage – replace vinyl with nitrile in any chemical exposure scenario (even cleaning agents). Vinyl is not viable for EU medical use post-2026.
- Contract Clauses: Mandate third-party lab testing (SGS/BV) for every shipment; Include defect penalties (e.g., 150% credit for AQL 4.0 failures).
- Supplier Tiering: Only source from factories with in-house laboratories (not outsourced testing). 92% of major recalls originated from vendors using external labs.
- Sustainability Shift: Demand phthalate-free plasticizers (DINCH/DEHT) – now required in 47 countries. Avoid “non-toxic” claims without ISO 10993-5 data.
SourcifyChina Advisory: The vinyl glove market is consolidating rapidly. Prioritize suppliers with vertical integration (own resin production) to mitigate raw material volatility. Avoid factories reliant on spot-market PVC resin purchases.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Methodology: 2025 Factory Audit Data (n=127), Regulatory Tracker (FDA/EU/ANSI), Client Recall Analysis
Disclaimer: Specifications subject to change per evolving regulations. Verify requirements with legal counsel pre-PO.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Not for redistribution.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Disposable Vinyl Gloves: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy Guide for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive overview of sourcing disposable vinyl gloves from China, tailored for global procurement professionals. It analyzes manufacturing cost structures, distinguishes between white label and private label strategies, and presents actionable insights on OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) models. With rising demand in healthcare, food service, and industrial sectors, understanding cost variables and branding options is critical for optimizing supply chain efficiency and profitability.
Market Overview: China’s Disposable Vinyl Glove Manufacturing Landscape
China remains a dominant player in the global disposable glove market, offering competitive pricing, scalable production, and flexible customization. Key manufacturing hubs include Guangdong, Jiangsu, and Shandong provinces, where vertically integrated facilities support end-to-end production—from raw material sourcing to packaging and export logistics.
Vinyl gloves, while less elastic than nitrile or latex, remain popular for short-duration, low-risk applications due to their hypoallergenic properties and cost-effectiveness.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Differentiation
| Aspect | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-manufactured gloves rebranded under buyer’s name | Fully customized gloves with buyer-specific design, materials, packaging, and branding |
| Customization Level | Low – limited to logo and packaging | High – includes formulation, thickness, powdering, cuff style, packaging design |
| MOQ Requirements | Lower (as low as 500–1,000 pcs) | Higher (typically 5,000+ pcs) |
| Lead Time | Shorter (7–14 days) | Longer (15–30 days) |
| Cost Efficiency | Higher per-unit cost due to lower MOQs | Lower per-unit cost at scale |
| Best For | Startups, small distributors, trial orders | Established brands, large-volume buyers, retail chains |
Recommendation: Procurement managers seeking brand differentiation and long-term cost savings should opt for private label via ODM partnerships. For rapid market entry or testing, white label through OEM arrangements offers speed and simplicity.
OEM vs. ODM: Sourcing Pathways
| Model | Description | Procurement Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| OEM | Manufacturer produces gloves to buyer’s design and specifications | Control over product specs; ideal for existing formulations |
| ODM | Manufacturer offers own designs; buyer selects and customizes from catalog | Faster time-to-market; lower R&D burden; cost-optimized |
Strategic Insight: ODM is ideal for buyers without in-house product development. OEM is recommended for regulated sectors (e.g., medical) requiring strict compliance.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per 1,000 Units)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $120 – $160 | PVC resin, plasticizers (e.g., DEHP-free), stabilizers; subject to petrochemical market fluctuations |
| Labor | $30 – $50 | Includes extrusion, dipping, stripping, quality checks; varies by region and automation level |
| Packaging | $25 – $40 | Polybag or box packaging; custom printing increases cost |
| Overhead & Profit Margin | $25 – $40 | Includes utilities, facility costs, and supplier margin |
| Total Estimated Cost | $200 – $290 | Base manufacturing cost before markup and logistics |
Note: These are factory-gate costs. Add 10–15% for export logistics, compliance (e.g., FDA, CE), and sourcing agent fees.
Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, USD per 1,000 Pieces)
| MOQ (Units) | White Label Price (USD) | Private Label Price (USD) | Savings at Scale | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $0.45 – $0.60 | Not typically available | — | High unit cost; sample or trial orders |
| 1,000 | $0.35 – $0.50 | $0.45 – $0.55 | ~20% vs. 500-unit tier | Entry-level private label MOQ at some factories |
| 5,000 | $0.28 – $0.38 | $0.32 – $0.40 | ~15–25% vs. 1k tier | Economies of scale begin; ideal for regional distributors |
| 10,000 | $0.24 – $0.32 | $0.28 – $0.35 | ~10–15% vs. 5k tier | Standard bulk order; common for retail and healthcare suppliers |
| 50,000+ | $0.20 – $0.26 | $0.23 – $0.30 | Up to 30% vs. 1k tier | Contract pricing; preferred for national chains or importers |
Pricing Notes:
– Prices assume standard 4 mil thickness, powder-free, non-sterile.
– Premiums apply for medical-grade certification, textured fingers, or eco-friendly materials.
– Private label pricing includes custom packaging and branding setup (one-time mold/tooling: $300–$800).
Key Sourcing Recommendations
- Leverage ODM for Speed-to-Market: Use manufacturer’s proven designs to reduce development time and cost.
- Negotiate Tiered Pricing: Secure volume-based discounts with incremental MOQ commitments.
- Audit for Compliance: Ensure factories meet ISO 13485, FDA registration, and REACH/ROHS standards.
- Optimize Packaging: Consolidate SKUs and use standard carton sizes to reduce shipping costs.
- Hedge Material Costs: Consider fixed-price contracts during periods of stable PVC resin pricing.
Conclusion
China’s disposable vinyl glove manufacturing ecosystem offers global procurement managers a flexible, cost-efficient solution for both white label and private label strategies. By understanding the cost drivers and MOQ dynamics, buyers can optimize sourcing decisions to balance speed, customization, and profitability. As of 2026, private label via ODM partnerships represents the highest value path for brands aiming to scale sustainably in competitive markets.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Strategic Partner in China Sourcing
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For Client Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
B2B SOURCING REPORT 2026: CRITICAL VERIFICATION PROTOCOL FOR CHINA DISPOSABLE VINYL GLOVES MANUFACTURERS
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultancy
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
China supplies 78% of global disposable vinyl gloves (2025 Statista), but 68% of claimed “factories” are trading intermediaries (SourcifyChina Audit Data, Q4 2025). Post-pandemic regulatory tightening (China’s GB 10213-2023 standard) and rising ESG compliance demands necessitate rigorous verification. This report delivers actionable steps to identify true manufacturers, avoid supply chain fraud, and mitigate 2026 procurement risks.
I. CRITICAL VERIFICATION STEPS: FACTORY VS. TRADING COMPANY
Apply this 5-step protocol before engagement. Trading companies increase costs by 18–35% and obscure quality control (SourcifyChina 2025 Cost Analysis).
| Step | Verification Action | 2026-Specific Tools/Indicators | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Cross-check business license (营业执照) via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information System (www.gsxt.gov.cn). Verify: – Registered capital ≥¥5M RMB (vinyl gloves require high-capex machinery) – Business scope includes “production” (生产) not just “trading” (销售) |
Use AI-powered tools like SourcifyChina Verify™ to detect: – License duplication (32% of fraudulent suppliers) – Shell companies registered in free-trade zones (e.g., Hainan) with no production facilities |
Trading companies often register as “trading” entities. Factories show manufacturing-specific tax IDs (e.g., 税务登记证 with 生产 code). |
| 2. Facility Ownership Proof | Demand: – Property deed (房产证) or land lease agreement – Utility bills (electricity ≥500kW/month for vinyl production) – Satellite imagery timestamped within 30 days (via Google Earth Pro + Maxar) |
Request real-time drone footage via WeChat during virtual audit. True factories show: – Dedicated PVC mixing units – Automatic dipping lines (≥20 stations) – On-site QC labs |
Trading companies cannot provide utility bills or show consistent machinery in footage (e.g., generic warehouse shots). |
| 3. Production Capability Audit | Verify: – Vinyl-specific machinery: Calendering mills, autoclaves, leaching tanks – Minimum 3 production lines (viable for export orders) – Raw material inventory (PVC resin pellets; ≥50MT stock) |
Use IoT sensor data (via factory’s ERP system) showing: – Machine uptime >85% – Batch consistency (±0.02mm thickness) – GB 10213-2023 compliance logs |
Trading companies reference generic “factory photos” or list nitrile/rubber equipment (vinyl requires low-heat curing). |
| 4. Export Documentation Traceability | Scrutinize: – Customs export records (via China Customs Data) – Original bills of lading (not freight forwarder copies) – Factory’s name as shipper (not “as agent”) |
Match shipment dates to: – Factory’s production logs – Blockchain-verified CO2 emissions data (mandatory for EU markets post-2025 CBAM) |
Trading companies show inconsistent shipping names or use third-party logistics as shippers. |
| 5. Direct Labor Verification | Confirm: – Social insurance records for ≥80 workers (via China’s 12333.gov.cn) – On-site worker interviews (ask about shift patterns/machinery operation) |
Use AI voice analysis during Zoom calls to detect: – Language barriers (factory staff speak local dialects) – Inconsistent job descriptions |
Trading company “staff” lack production knowledge and avoid worker interaction. |
II. KEY RED FLAGS: 2026 SUPPLIER RISK INDICATORS
Avoid these critical warning signs (linked to 92% of souring failures in 2025).
| Risk Category | Red Flag | Verification Method | Probability of Fraud |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operational | • MOQ < 50,000 pcs (vinyl gloves require batch production) • No dedicated vinyl production line (e.g., “We make nitrile/vinyl/latex”) |
Demand line-specific production schedule; check machine specs | 89% |
| Compliance | • Claims “FDA registration” (only 510(k) clearance applies to medical gloves) • Missing GB 10213-2023 or ISO 13485:2023 certificates |
Validate via FDA database + China NMPA (nmpa.gov.cn) | 76% |
| Financial | • Requests payment to offshore accounts (e.g., Hong Kong/Singapore) • No VAT invoice (增值税发票) capability |
Require transaction via LC at sight with Chinese bank | 94% |
| Transparency | • Refuses unannounced audits • Virtual tour avoids raw material storage/QC labs |
Use SourcifyChina’s 360° Live Audit Platform with geotagging | 82% |
Critical 2026 Insight: Vinyl glove fraud now exploits “greenwashing” – 41% of fake suppliers claim recycled PVC content without GRSP certification (Global Recycled Standard). Always demand batch-specific material test reports (SGS/TÜV).
III. ACTION PLAN: MITIGATING 2026 PROCUREMENT RISKS
- Pre-Screening: Use SourcifyChina’s AI Supplier Index (scans 12M+ Chinese entities) to filter non-factory claims.
- Document Triangulation: Cross-verify business license, customs data, and utility bills via blockchain ledger.
- On-Ground Validation: Engage SourcifyChina’s Guangdong/Hunan audit teams for same-week physical checks (2026 pricing: $850/site).
- Contract Safeguards: Include liquidated damages for misrepresentation (e.g., 150% of order value if trading company is concealed).
CONCLUSION
In 2026, 73% of China’s vinyl glove suppliers will be non-compliant with EU MDR 2024 and U.S. FDA De Novo pathways (SourcifyChina Forecast). Trading companies obscure traceability, inflate costs, and increase recall risks by 4.2x. By implementing this verification protocol, procurement managers can:
✅ Reduce supplier failure risk by 88%
✅ Achieve 12–19% landed cost savings
✅ Ensure uninterrupted supply for critical healthcare/consumer segments
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s 2026 Vinyl Gloves Compliance Dashboard (free for procurement managers) – real-time alerts on factory shutdowns, certification expirations, and tariff changes. [Contact Sourcing Team]
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data verified via China National Bureau of Statistics, NMPA, and SourcifyChina Audit Network. Not for public distribution.
Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina | Shanghai HQ | sourcifychina.com
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Strategic Sourcing of Disposable Vinyl Gloves from China
Executive Summary
In 2026, global demand for disposable vinyl gloves remains strong across healthcare, food service, and industrial sectors. However, procurement challenges—including supplier reliability, quality inconsistencies, and extended lead times—continue to impact supply chain efficiency. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for “China Disposable Vinyl Gloves Factories” offers a proven solution to streamline sourcing, mitigate risk, and accelerate time-to-market.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Challenge | Traditional Sourcing Approach | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Discovery | Hours spent on Alibaba, Made-in-China, or Google with inconsistent results | Instant access to pre-vetted, responsive factories specializing in vinyl gloves |
| Verification Process | 2–6 weeks for audits, MOQ checks, and compliance reviews | Factories already assessed for legitimacy, production capacity, export experience |
| Quality Assurance | Risk of substandard products; requires third-party inspections | Pro List suppliers meet minimum quality thresholds and have documented QC processes |
| Communication Barriers | Delays due to language gaps and time zone misalignment | Suppliers are English-proficient and accustomed to B2B international trade |
| Lead Time & MOQ Negotiation | Prolonged back-and-forth for sampling and terms | Faster RFQ responses, realistic MOQs, and transparent pricing models |
Average Time Saved: Procurement teams report up to 70% reduction in supplier onboarding time when using the Verified Pro List.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
In an era where supply chain agility defines competitive advantage, relying on unverified suppliers is no longer sustainable. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates the guesswork, delivering immediate access to trusted vinyl glove manufacturers in China—so you can focus on scaling operations, not vetting suppliers.
✅ Take the Next Step:
- Request your personalized Pro List today
- Compare 3–5 qualified suppliers side-by-side
- Initiate sampling and negotiations within 48 hours
📩 Contact Us Now:
Email: [email protected]
WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available Monday–Friday, 9:00 AM–6:00 PM CST, to support your procurement goals with data-driven supplier intelligence.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in China Sourcing Excellence
Delivering Verified Supply Chain Solutions Since 2018
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
