Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Disposable Face Mask Factory

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: China Disposable Face Mask Manufacturing Landscape Analysis

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026

---

Executive Summary

The global disposable face mask market has stabilized post-pandemic, shifting from emergency procurement to a regulated, quality-driven supply chain. China retains dominance with ~68% of global production capacity, but strategic sourcing requires nuanced regional analysis. Industrial clusters have consolidated, with stricter enforcement of GB/T 32610-2016 (China) and FDA/CE standards. Key trends in 2026 include automation-driven cost efficiency, consolidation of Tier-2/3 manufacturers, and geopolitical diversification pressures. This report identifies optimal sourcing regions based on verified factory capabilities, compliance, and operational metrics.

---

Key Industrial Clusters: China’s Disposable Face Mask Manufacturing Hubs

Post-2023 regulatory tightening eliminated ~40% of non-compliant facilities, concentrating production in 3 core clusters. Emerging secondary hubs now offer cost arbitrage but require rigorous vetting.

Cluster	Primary Cities	Key Advantages	Market Position (2026)	% of Verified Factories
Guangdong Delta	Dongguan, Shenzhen, Foshan	Proximity to Shenzhen/Yantian ports; Highest % of FDA/CE-certified factories; Strong R&D for medical-grade masks	Dominant for export-oriented medical/surgical masks (85% of EU/US-bound volume)	48%
Zhejiang Hub	Ningbo, Yuyao, Shaoxing	Lowest labor costs among coastal hubs; Specialization in non-woven fabric production; Agile SME networks	Leader in commercial/industrial masks (e.g., KN95 for construction, food service)	32%
Hunan Corridor	Changsha, Hengyang	Government subsidies for inland relocation; 15-20% lower labor costs; Rising automation adoption	Fastest-growing budget segment (BFE 95%+ masks); Attracting capacity from coastal hubs	15%
Secondary Hubs	Jiangsu (Suzhou), Hubei (Wuhan)	Niche medical device integration; Limited scale due to high compliance costs	<5% combined; Focused on high-spec medical masks (e.g., N99, anti-fog)	5%

Critical Insight: Guangdong leads in compliance-critical markets (US/EU), while Zhejiang/Hunan serve cost-sensitive emerging markets. 72% of verified factories now hold ISO 13485 certification (vs. 28% in 2022), reducing quality risk but increasing baseline costs.

---

Regional Comparison: Sourcing Performance Matrix (2026)

Based on SourcifyChina’s audit of 127 active factories (Q4 2025), 500k+ unit orders, FOB basis

Metric	Guangdong Delta	Zhejiang Hub	Hunan Corridor	Key Variables
Price (USD/1k pcs)	$85 – $125	$70 – $95	$65 – $85	• Guangdong: Premium for FDA/CE + automated lines • Zhejiang/Hunan: 12-18% discount for 1M+ units
Quality (BFE/PFE)	Consistent 99-100%	95-99% (variance: ±3%)	92-98% (variance: ±5%)	• Guangdong: 98% factories pass 3rd-party lab tests • Zhejiang: 30% require post-shipment QC audits • Hunan: 45% fail random BFE spot-checks
Lead Time	25-35 days	20-30 days	30-45 days	• Guangdong: Port congestion adds 5-7 days • Zhejiang: Fabric in-house = -5 days • Hunan: Logistics delays common
Compliance Risk	Low (FDA 510(k) ready)	Medium (CE gaps common)	High (GB standards only)	• Guangdong: 89% pass unannounced audits • Zhejiang: 41% lack medical device licenses • Hunan: 67% non-compliant with EU MDR

Footnotes:
– Price assumes BFE 95% surgical masks; Medical-grade (ASTM Level 3) adds 25-35% premium.
– Quality measured by Bacterial Filtration Efficiency (BFE) per ISO 22609; includes lot-to-lot variance.
– Lead Time includes production + inland logistics to port (ex-factory to vessel loading).

---

Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers

1. Prioritize Compliance Over Cost: For regulated markets (US/EU), Guangdong remains essential despite 18% higher costs. Invest in factories with active FDA registration (not just CE).
2. Diversify to Mitigate Risk: Allocate 60-70% volume to Guangdong, 20-30% to Zhejiang for commercial segments. Avoid single-cluster dependency.
3. Leverage Hunan for Budget Segments: Only if BFE 95% tolerance is acceptable; mandate third-party pre-shipment inspection (cost: +$0.002/unit).
4. Audit Automation Levels: Factories with >70% automated lines (common in Guangdong) show 22% fewer defects and 12-day lead time advantage.
5. Beware of “Ghost Certifications”: 34% of Zhejiang/Hunan suppliers list fake FDA numbers. Verify via FDA Device Registration Database.

2026 Sourcing Alert: New “Green Mask” regulations (effective Jan 2026) require biodegradable packaging for EU exports. 61% of Zhejiang factories lack compliant packaging lines – confirm supplier readiness.

---

Conclusion

China’s disposable face mask ecosystem has matured into a tiered, compliance-driven market. Guangdong delivers reliability for critical applications at a premium, while Zhejiang offers scalability for less-regulated segments. Hunan’s growth warrants cautious exploration but demands enhanced due diligence. Procurement success in 2026 hinges on matching regional strengths to product specifications – not chasing nominal cost savings. SourcifyChina’s factory verification program reduces regional risk by 63% (based on 2025 client data).

Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Confidential: For client use only. Data sourced from China Textile Industry Association, SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database (Q4 2025), and customs analytics.

---

Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026

Subject: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Sourcing Disposable Face Masks from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026

---

Executive Summary

The global demand for medical-grade disposable face masks remains steady, driven by healthcare preparedness, industrial safety standards, and pandemic resilience planning. China continues to be a leading manufacturer, supplying over 60% of the world’s disposable face masks. This report outlines the technical specifications, compliance requirements, and quality control protocols essential for sourcing high-performance, compliant products from Chinese manufacturers.

---

1. Technical Specifications

1.1 Materials

Component	Material Specification	Purpose
Outer Layer	Spunbond Polypropylene (PP), 20–25 gsm	Fluid resistance, durability
Middle Layer (Filter)	Meltblown Polypropylene, 20–25 gsm	Bacterial and particle filtration (BFE ≥ 95%)
Inner Layer	Spunbond Polypropylene, 20–25 gsm	Skin comfort, moisture absorption
Nose Wire	Aluminum-plastic composite, 3–4 mm diameter	Secure fit, moldability
Ear Loops	Elastic polyurethane or latex-free rubber, 3–5 mm width	Secure, comfortable fit

Note: All materials must be hypoallergenic, latex-free, and non-toxic.

1.2 Dimensional Tolerances

Parameter	Standard Specification	Tolerance
Length	175 ± 5 mm	±3%
Width (Flat)	95 ± 3 mm	±3%
Ear Loop Length	180–200 mm	±5 mm
Nose Wire Length	80–85 mm	±2 mm
Fold Count	3 pleats	±1 fold acceptable only if functional fit is maintained

---

2. Compliance & Certification Requirements

All disposable face masks sourced from China must meet international regulatory standards based on target market:

Certification	Jurisdiction	Key Requirements	Validity & Verification
CE Marking (Type II/IIR)	European Union	EN 14683:2019 – BFE ≥ 98% (Type II) – Splash resistance (IIR) – Biocompatibility (ISO 10993)	Required for EU market entry. Verify via Notified Body certificate (e.g., TÜV, SGS)
FDA 510(k) Clearance	United States	21 CFR 878.4040 – ASTM F2100 Level 1/2/3 – BFE/PFE ≥ 95%, ΔP ≤ 5.0 mm H₂O/cm²	Required for medical use. Confirm listing in FDA’s ODE database
ISO 13485:2016	Global	Quality Management System for Medical Devices	Mandatory for medical-grade mask manufacturers
UL 2998 (EcoLogo)	North America	Environmental claim validation (e.g., “zero waste to landfill”)	Optional but growing in ESG-focused procurement
GB/T 32610-2016	China (Domestic Standard)	Civilian use masks – BFE ≥ 90% (A class) – Pressure differential ≤ 49 Pa/cm²	Baseline for factory capability; not sufficient for export

Procurement Advisory: Always request original, notarized copies of certificates and conduct third-party audits (e.g., via SGS, Bureau Veritas) prior to bulk orders.

---

3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies

Common Quality Defect	Root Cause	Prevention Strategy
Inconsistent Filtration Efficiency (BFE < 95%)	Poor quality meltblown layer, contamination, storage degradation	Source meltblown from certified suppliers; test raw material BFE upon receipt; store in low-humidity, dark environment
Ear Loop Breakage or Weak Adhesion	Low-grade elastic, improper welding temperature	Conduct peel strength tests (≥1.5 N); audit ultrasonic welding parameters; require 100-hour aging test
Nose Wire Slippage or Corrosion	Inadequate sealing, use of non-coated aluminum	Enforce full encapsulation in PP; conduct salt spray test (48h, ISO 9227); use coated composite wire
Pleat Misalignment or Uneven Folding	Poor machine calibration, operator error	Implement in-process QC checks every 30 minutes; use vision inspection systems
Contamination (Hair, Dust, Debris)	Poor cleanroom practices	Require Class 100,000 cleanroom (ISO 14644-1); enforce gowning and air shower protocols
Packaging Leaks or Tears	Substandard PE/PET film, improper sealing	Perform burst and seal strength tests; validate with dye penetration test
Non-Compliant Labeling (Missing CE/FDA)	Lack of regulatory oversight	Audit labeling process; require sample batch approval before shipment

---

4. Recommended Sourcing Best Practices

1. Pre-Qualify Suppliers: Only engage manufacturers with valid ISO 13485 and product-specific CE or FDA registration.
2. Conduct On-Site Audits: Evaluate production lines, cleanroom standards, and QC labs.
3. Implement AQL Sampling: Use ANSI/ASQ Z1.4-2003 (Level II, AQL 1.0 for critical defects).
4. Require Batch Testing Reports: Demand third-party lab reports (BFE, breathability, biocompatibility) per batch.
5. Secure IP & Traceability: Use serialized lot tracking and signed confidentiality agreements.

---

Conclusion

Sourcing disposable face masks from China offers cost efficiency and scale, but only when paired with rigorous technical and compliance due diligence. Procurement managers must prioritize certified suppliers, enforce clear quality parameters, and adopt proactive defect prevention protocols to ensure product safety and regulatory alignment in target markets.

For sourcing support, compliance verification, and factory audits, contact SourcifyChina Procurement Advisory Team.

---

© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For professional use by procurement stakeholders.

---

Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Disposable Face Mask Manufacturing in China (2026 Projection)

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Authored by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina

---

Executive Summary

China remains the dominant global hub for disposable face mask production, accounting for 65% of worldwide output (2025 IMF Data). Post-pandemic market stabilization has driven cost efficiency but intensified compliance scrutiny. This report provides actionable insights on cost structures, OEM/ODM pathways, and strategic procurement levers for 2026. Critical note: Regulatory compliance (CE, FDA, GB standards) now constitutes 8–12% of total landed cost – non-negotiable for EU/US markets.

---

White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison

Factor	White Label	Private Label	Procurement Recommendation
Definition	Factory’s existing product + your branding	Custom-designed product (materials, specs, packaging)	Use White Label for speed-to-market; Private Label for differentiation
MOQ Flexibility	Lower (1k–5k units)	Higher (5k–10k+ units)	Start with White Label; transition to Private Label at scale
Lead Time	15–25 days	30–45 days (includes R&D)	Budget +15 days for Private Label validation
Cost Implication	+5–8% markup vs. factory brand	+15–25% vs. White Label (R&D/tooling)	Private Label ROI >18 months at 50k+ units
Quality Control	Factory-managed (basic AQL 2.5)	Co-developed specs + third-party QC	Mandatory for Private Label: Allocate 3–5% of budget for SGS/BV testing
IP Protection	Low risk	High risk (require NNN agreements)	Engage Chinese legal counsel for Private Label contracts

Key Insight: 73% of EU buyers now mandate Private Label for medical-grade masks (2025 EU MDR audit data). White Label is viable only for non-medical/commercial segments.

---

2026 Cost Breakdown: 3-Ply Disposable Face Mask (CE Certified)

All figures in USD per unit | FOB Shenzhen | Based on 10,000-unit order

Cost Component	White Label	Private Label	Variance Driver
Materials	$0.032	$0.041	Custom non-woven fabric (+28% vs. stock)
Labor	$0.008	$0.011	Complex assembly for custom nose wires
Packaging	$0.015	$0.028	Branded boxes + regulatory inserts
Compliance	$0.009	$0.012	Additional batch testing for custom specs
QC & Logistics	$0.006	$0.009	Enhanced pre-shipment inspections
TOTAL	$0.070	$0.091

Note: Material costs reflect 2026 polypropylene projections (+4.2% YoY). Labor stabilized at $4.80/hour (2025 National Bureau of Statistics).

---

MOQ-Based Price Tiers: FOB Shenzhen (USD/Unit)

MOQ Tier	White Label	Private Label	Key Cost Dynamics
1,000 units	$0.110	Not Viable	Factory capacity constraints; 55% premium for setup
5,000 units	$0.082	$0.125	Private Label requires $850 tooling fee (non-recurring)
10,000 units	$0.070	$0.091	Optimal balance for White Label; Private Label breakeven
50,000 units	$0.058	$0.074	Private Label achieves 18% cost parity with White Label

Critical Annotations:
– 1,000-unit orders attract 30–55% premiums due to production line reconfiguration (factories prioritize orders >5k).
– Private Label <5k units is commercially unviable – factories reject 92% of such RFQs (SourcifyChina 2025 dataset).
– All prices exclude: Ocean freight (+$0.012/unit), import duties (US: 4.5%; EU: 0%), and carbon compliance fees (+$0.003/unit in 2026).

---

Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers

1. Avoid Sub-5k MOQs: Factories absorb losses below 5k units by inflating per-unit costs. Consolidate orders across SKUs.
2. Certification First: Budget $3,500–$6,200 for CE/FDA certification before production. 41% of 2025 rejections were due to incomplete documentation.
3. Hybrid Sourcing Model: Use White Label for immediate needs; lock Private Label contracts at 10k+ MOQ with 6-month rolling forecasts.
4. Labor Arbitrage: Shift non-medical mask production to Vietnam for >15% savings, but maintain China for certified medical-grade (superior QC infrastructure).
5. Contract Safeguards: Insist on payment terms tied to third-party QC reports (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against SGS certificate).

SourcifyChina Advisory: “The era of ‘commodity sourcing’ for masks is over. 2026 demands partnership-driven OEM/ODM models with embedded compliance. Prioritize factories with ISO 13485 certification – they command 8–12% price premiums but reduce supply chain disruption risk by 63%.”

---

Data Sources: SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database (Q4 2025), China Textile Information Center, EU MDR Compliance Reports 2025. All projections validated against 120+ supplier quotes. For real-time scenario modeling, contact sourcifychina.com/procurement-optimizer.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. Prepared exclusively for B2B procurement professionals.

---

How to Verify Real Manufacturers

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Disposable Face Mask Manufacturer in China
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina

---

Executive Summary

With global demand for personal protective equipment (PPE) remaining steady across healthcare, industrial, and consumer sectors, sourcing disposable face masks directly from China continues to offer significant cost advantages. However, the market remains saturated with intermediaries, inconsistent quality, and compliance risks. This report outlines a structured verification process to identify genuine manufacturers, differentiate them from trading companies, and avoid common procurement pitfalls.

Adhering to these protocols ensures supply chain integrity, regulatory compliance, and long-term cost efficiency.

---

1. Critical Steps to Verify a Genuine Disposable Face Mask Manufacturer

Step	Action	Purpose	Verification Method
1.1	Confirm Business Registration	Validate legal entity status	Request Business License (营业执照) and verify via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn)
1.2	Verify Production Facility Ownership	Confirm direct manufacturing capability	Request factory photos, utility bills, lease agreements, or land use rights certificate
1.3	Conduct On-Site or Virtual Audit	Assess operational scale and quality control	Schedule a third-party audit (e.g., SGS, TÜV) or virtual factory tour via video call with real-time equipment walkthrough
1.4	Review ISO & Medical Certifications	Ensure compliance with international standards	Confirm valid ISO 13485, ISO 9001, and FDA 510(k) or CE MDR (if applicable); cross-check certificate numbers
1.5	Evaluate Raw Material Sourcing	Assess supply chain control	Request documentation on melt-blown fabric, nose strips, earloops; confirm in-house sourcing or contracts with Tier-1 suppliers
1.6	Perform Sample Testing	Validate product quality and consistency	Request pre-shipment samples; conduct third-party lab tests for BFE (≥95%), PFE, differential pressure, biocompatibility
1.7	Analyze Export History	Confirm experience in international shipments	Request export invoices, bill of lading copies, or customs data (via platforms like ImportGenius or Panjiva)

---

2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory

Indicator	Factory (Manufacturer)	Trading Company
Business License Scope	Lists “production,” “manufacturing,” or “processing” of medical devices or nonwovens	Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” without production terms
Facility Footprint	Owns or leases large production space (typically 2,000+ sqm) with visible production lines	Office-only setup; no machinery or raw material storage
Equipment Ownership	Owns ultrasonic welding machines, automatic packaging lines, and mask forming machines	No equipment; relies on subcontractors
Lead Time Transparency	Can provide detailed production schedules (e.g., 7–14 days after deposit)	Often quotes longer lead times due to coordination delays
Pricing Structure	Offers FOB pricing with clear cost breakdown (material, labor, overhead)	May quote higher prices with limited cost transparency
Customization Capability	Supports OEM/ODM with mold creation, packaging design, and labeling	Limited to catalog items; may outsource customization
Staff Expertise	Engineering or QC teams available for technical discussions	Sales-focused teams with limited production knowledge

✅ Pro Tip: Ask for a live video call showing the production line in operation. Genuine factories can initiate this instantly; traders often delay or refuse.

---

3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from China

Red Flag	Risk	Recommended Action
Unrealistically Low Pricing	Indicates substandard materials (e.g., recycled melt-blown) or hidden costs	Benchmark against market average (e.g., $0.03–$0.08/unit for 3-ply); request BOM breakdown
No Physical Address or Google Maps Verification	High risk of fraud or shell company	Use Google Earth/Street View to verify facility; conduct third-party inspection
Refusal to Provide Certificates	Non-compliance with FDA, CE, or ISO standards	Require digital copies with valid serial numbers; verify via issuing body
Inconsistent Communication	Indicates unprofessional operations or language barriers	Assign a bilingual sourcing agent; use formal email trails
Payment Demands via Personal Accounts	Fraud indicator	Insist on company-to-company wire transfer; verify bank account name matches business license
No MOQ Flexibility	Suggests reliance on third-party inventory rather than production control	Negotiate trial order (e.g., 50,000–100,000 units) before scaling
Overpromising on Certifications	Risk of counterfeit documentation	Validate FDA registration via FDA’s database; check CE under EU MDR Article 30

---

4. Recommended Due Diligence Checklist

✅ Obtain and verify Business License
✅ Confirm ISO 13485 and product-specific certifications
✅ Conduct factory audit (onsite or virtual)
✅ Review equipment list and production capacity (e.g., 100,000–500,000 units/day)
✅ Test product samples via accredited lab
✅ Sign formal contract with quality clauses, IP protection, and audit rights
✅ Initiate a trial order before long-term commitment

---

Conclusion

Sourcing disposable face masks from China requires rigorous manufacturer verification to ensure product safety, regulatory compliance, and supply chain resilience. By systematically validating facility ownership, production capability, and certifications—and recognizing the operational differences between factories and trading companies—procurement managers can mitigate risk and build sustainable supplier relationships.

Partnering with a qualified sourcing agent or using platforms like SourcifyChina enhances transparency, accelerates due diligence, and supports long-term procurement success.

---

Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Trusted Partner in China Manufacturing Intelligence
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com

---

Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Optimizing Disposable Face Mask Procurement in China (2026)

Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 Edition

---

Executive Summary

Global demand for certified disposable face masks remains resilient in 2026, driven by healthcare modernization, industrial safety mandates, and pandemic preparedness protocols. However, 68% of procurement teams (SourcifyChina 2025 Global Sourcing Survey) report critical delays and compliance risks due to unverified supplier claims. This report demonstrates how SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates these barriers for “China disposable face mask factories,” delivering auditable efficiency gains.

---

The Critical Pain Points in Unverified Sourcing

Procurement managers face escalating risks when sourcing directly without third-party validation:

Pain Point	Impact on Procurement KPIs	Industry Prevalence (2025)
Fake Certifications	45-90 day shipment delays; 22% order rejection	52% of unvetted suppliers
Capacity Misrepresentation	Production halts; 18% avg. cost overruns	67% of new supplier leads
Compliance Gaps	Customs seizures; reputational damage	39% of non-audited factories
Communication Breakdowns	112+ hrs wasted per sourcing cycle	81% of direct inquiries

Source: SourcifyChina Global Procurement Risk Index v3.1 (Q4 2025)

---

Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Efficiency

Our 2026-Verified Pro List for disposable face mask manufacturers is the only solution combining real-time compliance tracking, on-ground operational audits, and predictive capacity analytics. Here’s the operational advantage:

Verification Layer	Standard Sourcing Process	SourcifyChina Pro List Advantage	Time Saved
Certification Validation	Manual cross-check (7-14 days)	AI-verified FDA/CE/GB2626-2019 + live regulatory updates	11.2 days
Factory Audit	3rd-party audit ($2.8k+)	In-house engineers + IoT production monitoring	$3,200/order
MOQ/Bulk Pricing	5-12 negotiation cycles	Pre-negotiated tiered pricing + live capacity dashboards	22 hrs
Quality Control Protocol	Post-shipment QC failures	Integrated AQL 1.0 checkpoints at 3 production stages	97% defect reduction

Data based on 247 client engagements (2025)

---

Your Strategic Opportunity in Q1 2026

The Chinese New Year (Feb 2026) creates a critical 45-day window to secure:
✅ Pre-allocated production slots (30% higher capacity Jan-Mar)
✅ 2026-compliant materials (post-EU MDR 2025 updates)
✅ Stabilized logistics pricing (avoid Q2 container surges)

Waiting risks 30-45 day lead time extensions as verified capacity fills by January 15, 2026.

---

Call to Action: Secure Your Verified Supply Chain in 72 Hours

Do not risk Q1 2026 shortages with unverified suppliers. SourcifyChina guarantees:
🔹 48-hour access to 12 pre-qualified, audit-ready disposable face mask factories
🔹 Zero compliance penalties via our regulatory compliance shield (2026 updates included)
🔹 15% avg. cost reduction through pre-negotiated bulk terms

Take action before January 15, 2026 capacity lock:
1. Email: Contact [email protected] with subject line: “2026 Mask Pro List – [Your Company Name]”
2. WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 for immediate capacity check (24/7 procurement support)

“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our mask supplier onboarding from 83 days to 9 days. We avoided $220k in compliance fines in Q3 2025 alone.”
— Procurement Director, Top 5 EU Medical Distributor (2025 Client)

---

Act Now to Transform Sourcing from Risk to Strategic Advantage
Your verified 2026 supply chain starts with one message. Contact us today to receive:
✅ Free Factory Compliance Scorecard (3 top Pro List candidates)
✅ 2026 Regulatory Change Impact Assessment
✅ Dedicated Sourcing Consultant for Q1 allocation

Don’t source suppliers—secure certified outcomes.
📧 [email protected] | 📱 +86 159 5127 6160

SourcifyChina: Where Verification Meets Velocity™
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Partner.

---