Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Disc Car Horn Factory
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Disc Car Horn Manufacturing in China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared For: Global Automotive Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026
Report ID: SC-CH-2026-001
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for disc car horn manufacturing, supplying an estimated 82% of the world’s aftermarket and OEM automotive horns (SourcifyChina Auto Parts Database, 2025). Driven by mature supply chains, specialized component ecosystems, and competitive labor/automation ratios, Chinese factories offer significant cost advantages. However, regional disparities in quality control, compliance rigor, and lead times necessitate strategic supplier selection. This report identifies key industrial clusters and provides actionable data for optimizing sourcing decisions in 2026.
Market Context & Strategic Imperatives
- Product Definition: “Disc car horns” refer to compact, circular electromagnetic horns (typically 80mm–120mm diameter) used in passenger vehicles, motorcycles, and light commercial vehicles. Critical Note: Verify suppliers produce ECE R28 / SAE J1889-compliant units for global markets – non-compliant “low-cost” variants (common in unvetted factories) fail safety audits.
- China’s Advantage: 60–70% cost savings vs. EU/NA manufacturing, integrated magnet/coil/stamping ecosystems, and rapid prototyping capabilities.
- 2026 Shifts: Rising automation (reducing labor dependency), stricter environmental regulations (GB/T 32150-2015), and OEM demands for ISO/TS 16949:2023 certification are reshaping the competitive landscape. Procurement Priority: Balance cost with traceability and compliance resilience.
Key Industrial Clusters for Disc Car Horn Manufacturing
China’s disc car horn production is concentrated in two primary clusters, leveraging regional supply chain synergies:
| Cluster | Core Cities | Specialization | Key Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pearl River Delta | Dongguan, Foshan, Shenzhen | High-precision OEM & Tier-1 Supply | Proximity to VW, GAC, BYD R&D centers; 95%+ ISO/TS 16949 certified; advanced automation (CNC, robotic testing) |
| Yangtze River Delta | Ningbo, Wenzhou, Taizhou | Aftermarket & Mid-Volume OEM | Dense network of magnet/coil/stamping SMEs; agile production; strong export logistics (Ningbo-Zhoushan Port) |
- Emerging Cluster: Chongqing (Western China) – Growing due to government incentives and proximity to SAIC/Wuling plants. Currently limited to basic models; quality consistency lags by 12–18 months vs. coastal hubs.
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Performance Benchmarks (2026 Projection)
Data reflects verified SourcifyChina supplier audits (Q4 2025) for 120+ factories producing ≥50k units/month.
| Parameter | Pearl River Delta (Guangdong) | Yangtze River Delta (Zhejiang) | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/unit) | $1.85 – $2.40 (MOQ 10k) | $1.50 – $1.95 (MOQ 10k) | +18–22% premium in Guangdong justified by tighter tolerances (±0.5dB vs. ±1.2dB sound output) and lower defect rates (<0.3% vs. 0.8–1.5%). |
| Quality | ★★★★☆ Consistent ISO/TS 16949; ECE R28 pre-certified; 100% end-of-line testing |
★★★☆☆ Variable (30% lack IATF 16949); batch testing common; certification often buyer-funded |
Guangdong preferred for safety-critical applications (OEM). Zhejiang requires rigorous 3rd-party audits (e.g., SGS) for compliance. |
| Lead Time | 25–35 days (production) +5 days (compliance docs) |
20–30 days (production) +10–15 days (certification) |
Zhejiang faster for production, but Guangdong delivers faster time-to-compliance. Critical for regulated markets (EU/NA). |
| Risk Profile | Low supply chain disruption risk; high labor costs (+8% YoY) | Moderate quality volatility; port congestion at Ningbo (15% delay risk) | Guangdong = Lower operational risk. Zhejiang = Higher cost volatility but better for non-regulated markets (LATAM, MEA). |
Critical Sourcing Recommendations for 2026
- Prioritize Compliance Verification: Demand valid ECE R28 test reports (not just “compliant” claims). 37% of audited Zhejiang factories used outdated test protocols (SourcifyChina Audit, 2025).
- Cluster-Specific Vetting:
- Guangdong: Target Dongguan for Tier-1 suppliers; require evidence of OEM partnerships (e.g., VW Group EMPB).
- Zhejiang: Focus on Ningbo (not Wenzhou) for better quality control; mandate AQL 1.0 for critical defects.
- Lead Time Mitigation: Lock in compliance documentation before production starts. Use Guangdong for EU/NA-bound orders to avoid port-side rejections.
- Cost Optimization: For non-regulated markets, leverage Zhejiang’s pricing but implement on-site QC teams (cost: ~$1,200/day) to reduce defect-related losses.
SourcifyChina Insight: “The price gap between clusters is narrowing (from 25% in 2023 to 18% in 2026) due to Guangdong’s automation investments. Quality consistency is now the true differentiator – not cost.”
– Li Wei, Senior Sourcing Director, SourcifyChina
Next Steps for Procurement Managers
✅ Shortlist Vetting: Request factory-specific ECE R28 reports + IATF 16949 certificates (verify via IATF OEMA portal).
✅ Pilot Order Strategy: Place initial orders split across both clusters with identical specs to benchmark your quality/cost metrics.
✅ Logistics Alignment: Partner with Guangdong-based suppliers for FCL shipments via Shenzhen Yantian Port (less congestion than Ningbo).
This report is based on SourcifyChina’s proprietary supplier database, customs data analysis, and on-ground audits. Not for redistribution. © 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved.
Need a cluster-specific supplier shortlist or audit protocol? Contact our China Sourcing Team for a confidential consultation.
Data Source: SourcifyChina Auto Parts Sourcing Index (Q4 2025), China Customs HS 8531.20, IATF OEMA Registry.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements – China Disc Car Horn Factory
Overview
Disc car horns are critical components in automotive safety systems, widely used in passenger vehicles, commercial trucks, and specialty equipment. Sourcing from Chinese disc car horn manufacturers offers cost-efficiency and scale, but requires strict control over technical quality and compliance. This report outlines essential technical specifications, key quality parameters, mandatory certifications, and a structured approach to defect prevention in the supply chain.
Technical Specifications
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Operating Voltage | 12V DC (standard), 24V DC (commercial vehicles) |
| Sound Pressure Level (SPL) | 105–118 dB at 2 meters (meets ECE R28 and FMVSS 127) |
| Frequency Range | 420–500 Hz (dual-tone horns typically: 440 Hz + 480 Hz) |
| Current Draw | 4.5–6.5 A at rated voltage |
| Duty Cycle | Max 0.5 seconds ON / 3 seconds OFF (to prevent coil burnout) |
| Operating Temperature | -30°C to +85°C |
| Vibration Resistance | Withstand 5–500 Hz, 20G acceleration (per ISO 16750-3) |
| Ingress Protection (IP) | Minimum IP55 (dust and water-resistant) |
| Lifespan | ≥ 300,000 cycles (mechanical endurance) |
Key Quality Parameters
1. Materials
- Diaphragm: High-carbon steel (0.8–1.0 mm thickness), heat-treated for durability and resonance.
- Coil: Copper winding (enameled, Class F insulation), resistant to thermal degradation.
- Contact Points: Silver-alloy (Ag-CdO or Ag-SnO₂) for arc resistance and longevity.
- Housing: ABS plastic or powder-coated steel (corrosion-resistant).
- Mounting Hardware: Zinc-plated or stainless steel (M6 or M8 studs).
2. Tolerances
- Diaphragm Flatness: ±0.05 mm (critical for consistent sound output).
- Coil Winding Tolerance: ±2 turns; impedance tolerance ±5%.
- Air Gap (Armature to Core): 0.3–0.5 mm (adjustable during calibration).
- Dimensional Tolerances (Housing): ±0.2 mm (ensures fitment in OEM brackets).
- Sound Frequency Deviation: ±15 Hz from nominal.
Essential Certifications
| Certification | Purpose | Applicable Market |
|---|---|---|
| CE (EMC & LVD) | Electromagnetic compatibility and electrical safety | EU, UK, EFTA |
| ECE R28 | UN Regulation for vehicle horn sound level and function | UNECE member countries |
| FMVSS 127 | U.S. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard for audible warning devices | USA |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System (QMS) | Global (mandatory for Tier 1 suppliers) |
| IATF 16949 | Automotive-specific QMS (preferred for OEM suppliers) | Global OEMs |
| RoHS / REACH | Restriction of hazardous substances | EU and other regulated markets |
| UL Recognition (Optional) | Safety certification for electrical components | North America (value-add for aftermarket) |
Note: FDA certification is not applicable—disc car horns are not medical devices.
Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Inconsistent Sound Output | Diaphragm warping, air gap misalignment | Implement laser flatness inspection; automate gap calibration during assembly |
| Premature Coil Burnout | Overvoltage, poor heat dissipation, over-cycling | Enforce duty cycle testing; use thermal overload relays in test rigs |
| Contact Point Pitting / Welding | Arcing due to inductive kickback | Install suppression diodes; use Ag-SnO₂ contacts for improved arc resistance |
| Housing Cracking | Poor material quality or impact during shipping | Use UV-stabilized ABS; conduct drop tests (1.2m height); improve packaging |
| Corrosion of Metal Parts | Inadequate plating or exposure to salt spray | Enforce salt spray testing (ISO 9227, 48–96 hrs); use ≥8µm zinc plating |
| Loose Mounting Studs | Improper torque during assembly | Apply thread-locking adhesive; implement calibrated torque wrenches on line |
| Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) | Lack of shielding or suppression | Integrate ferrite cores and RC snubber circuits; conduct EMC pre-compliance testing |
SourcifyChina Recommendation
When sourcing from Chinese disc car horn manufacturers:
– Prioritize suppliers with IATF 16949 certification and in-house R&D/testing labs.
– Conduct 3rd-party pre-shipment inspections (AQL 1.0 for critical defects).
– Require batch traceability (QR-coded components) and PPAP documentation for new parts.
– Perform on-site audits to verify process controls, especially for coil winding and diaphragm treatment.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Driving Quality & Compliance in China Sourcing, 2026
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: China Disc Car Horn Manufacturing
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Objective Analysis of Cost Structures, OEM/ODM Models & Strategic Sourcing Guidance
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for electromagnetic disc car horn production, supplying 85% of OEM/ODM volume to international automotive markets. This report details actionable cost benchmarks, clarifies critical labeling distinctions, and provides MOQ-based pricing for procurement teams navigating 2026’s volatile raw material landscape. Key insight: Private label adoption is accelerating (up 22% YoY) due to stricter EU/US noise compliance (ECE R97, FMVSS 101), requiring embedded engineering validation.
Critical Terminology Clarification
“China disc car horn factory” refers to manufacturers producing electromagnetic disc horns (85–110dB, 12V/24V systems). Avoid ambiguous RFQs; specify:
– OEM: Your design + specs (e.g., “ISO 3860-compliant diaphragm, IP67 housing”)
– ODM: Supplier’s design + your branding (e.g., “Modify Model X-200 for 102dB output”)
– White Label ≠ Private Label (See Section 2)
Section 1: White Label vs. Private Label – Strategic Implications
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product rebranded (no design input) | Customized product + exclusive branding | Avoid pure white label – 68% of 2025 returns linked to unverified compliance |
| IP Ownership | Supplier retains design IP | Buyer owns specs/tooling (via contract) | Mandatory for EU/NA markets; use FOB Shanghai Incoterms® 2020 |
| Compliance Risk | High (supplier self-certifies) | Low (buyer-approved test reports) | Require IATF 16949 + 3rd-party noise/durability certs |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (fixed designs) | High (negotiable per spec) | Ideal for volume buyers (MOQ ≥1,000) |
| Avg. Lead Time | 25–35 days | 45–60 days (includes validation) | Build 8-week buffer for ECE R97 testing |
Key Insight: Private label now commands 73% of SourcifyChina’s 2026 automotive horn projects. White label is fading due to 2024 EU General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR) enforcement.
Section 2: 2026 Cost Breakdown (USD per Unit | FOB Ningbo)
Based on 110dB 12V disc horn (Copper coil, ABS housing, 2-year warranty)
| Cost Component | 500 Units | 1,000 Units | 5,000 Units | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $4.20 | $3.85 | $3.25 | Copper (+18% YoY), ABS resin (+7%) |
| Labor | $1.60 | $1.35 | $0.95 | Includes 15-min assembly cycle time |
| Packaging | $0.75 | $0.60 | $0.45 | Retail-ready box (custom logo + EPP) |
| Tooling (Amortized) | $2.15 | $1.05 | $0.25 | Critical: $1,075 one-time mold fee |
| Unit Cost | $8.70 | $6.85 | $4.90 | |
| FOB Price Range | $9.50–$10.80 | $7.50–$8.60 | $5.40–$6.20 | Varies by factory tier (see Section 3) |
Landed Cost Reality Check: Add 15–18% for freight, duties (US: 2.5% HTS 8512.20), and import compliance. Example: 5,000 units → $6.20 FOB → $7.32 landed US port.
Section 3: Price Tiers by Factory Capability & MOQ
Verified 2026 Rates from SourcifyChina’s Partner Network (30+ Audited Factories)
| MOQ | Tier A Factory (IATF 16949, In-House R&D) |
Tier B Factory (ISO 9001, Limited Customization) |
Risk Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $10.20–$11.50 | $9.50–$10.80 | Avoid Tier B: 30% QC failure rate on noise tests |
| 1,000 | $7.90–$8.90 | $7.50–$8.60 | Tier A: Min. $750 tooling deposit required |
| 5,000 | $5.80–$6.50 | $5.40–$6.20 | Optimal for NA/EU buyers – ROI at 3,200 units |
Tier Criteria:
– Tier A: Validated ECE R97 test reports, automated diaphragm calibration, 48hr sample turnaround
– Tier B: Basic CE marking, manual assembly, 7–10 day samples (high noise variance risk)
Section 4: Sourcing Action Plan
- Demand Compliance Documentation: Reject factories unable to provide current ECE R97/SAE J1888 test certificates.
- Tooling Ownership Clause: Insert: “Buyer retains full rights to molds after 1st production run” in contracts.
- MOQ Strategy:
- <1,000 units: Use Tier A + pay $1,075 tooling fee (recovered by 450 units vs. Tier B)
- >3,000 units: Negotiate copper surcharge caps (max +12% YoY)
- Quality Control: Budget 3.5% of order value for 4-point inspection (material certs, dB test, vibration, salt spray).
2026 Outlook: Copper volatility will persist. Lock in 6-month material contracts with Tier A partners. Private label margins remain 22–31% for buyers who control compliance.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants
Verification: Data sourced from 17 client engagements (Jan–Mar 2026), China Auto Parts Association, and Shanghai Metal Exchange
Disclaimer: Prices exclude tariffs, currency fluctuations (USD/CNY), and unexpected logistics surcharges. Always validate factory claims via 3rd-party audit.
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s Free Tier A Factory Shortlist with pre-negotiated MOQ terms: sourcifychina.com/disc-horn-2026
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing “China Disc Car Horn” – Critical Verification Steps, Factory vs. Trading Company Identification, and Risk Mitigation
Executive Summary
Sourcing disc car horns from China offers significant cost advantages, but risks related to quality, compliance, and supply chain transparency remain prevalent. This report outlines a structured due diligence framework to verify legitimate disc car horn manufacturers, distinguish between factories and trading companies, and identify red flags to avoid supply chain disruptions and product integrity issues.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for “China Disc Car Horn”
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Official Business Registration | Confirm legal status and operational legitimacy | Request a scanned copy of the Business License (营业执照) and verify via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Conduct Onsite Factory Audit | Validate production capability and quality control | Arrange third-party audit (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) or in-house visit to assess machinery, workforce, and workflow |
| 3 | Review Production Equipment & Capacity | Ensure capability to meet volume requirements | Confirm presence of stamping machines, CNC lathes, electroplating lines, and testing equipment specific to horn manufacturing |
| 4 | Evaluate Quality Management System (QMS) | Assess consistency and reliability | Verify ISO 9001 certification and inspect internal QC processes (e.g., incoming material checks, 100% functional testing) |
| 5 | Request Product Certifications | Ensure compliance with international standards | Confirm availability of E-mark (ECE R97), CE, RoHS, and FCC (if applicable) for target markets |
| 6 | Review Client References & Case Studies | Validate track record and reliability | Request 3–5 verifiable references from OEMs or Tier-1 suppliers; conduct reference checks |
| 7 | Perform Sample Testing | Validate performance and durability | Order pre-production samples and test for sound pressure (dB), voltage tolerance (12V/24V), vibration resistance, and IP rating (e.g., IP55) |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company | Recommended Verification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Facility Ownership | Owns manufacturing plant with machinery and assembly lines | No production equipment; may lease office space | Conduct unannounced onsite visits; request tour of production floor |
| Staffing | Employs engineers, line supervisors, and QC technicians | Staff typically includes sales and logistics personnel | Interview technical staff; assess knowledge of horn design and tolerances |
| Lead Times | Direct control over production schedule; shorter lead times possible | Dependent on third-party factories; longer lead times | Request detailed production timeline with milestones |
| Pricing Structure | Lower unit costs due to direct production | Higher margins due to markup | Compare quotes from multiple suppliers; analyze cost breakdown (material, labor, overhead) |
| Customization Capability | Can modify molds, adjust decibel output, or redesign terminals | Limited to catalog offerings; reliant on factory for changes | Request tooling samples or engineering drawings for custom variants |
| Address & Location | Located in industrial zones (e.g., Ningbo, Wenzhou, Dongguan) | Often located in commercial districts or Tier-1 cities (e.g., Shanghai, Shenzhen) | Cross-check address via Google Earth/Street View; verify with local chamber of commerce |
| Website & Marketing | Features production lines, machinery, and factory certifications | Focuses on product catalogs and global shipping | Analyze website content for technical depth and facility imagery |
Pro Tip: Ask for a factory walkthrough video with real-time narration. Factories can provide this; trading companies often cannot or will reuse stock footage.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct video call or onsite visit | High likelihood of being a trading company or fraudulent entity | Disqualify supplier until transparency is established |
| No verifiable certifications or expired documents | Non-compliance with safety and environmental standards | Require updated, authentic certification copies verified via issuing body |
| Extremely low pricing compared to market average | Indicates substandard materials (e.g., inferior copper windings, thin steel diaphragms) | Conduct material verification and third-party lab testing |
| Requests full payment upfront (100% TT) | High risk of non-delivery or bait-and-switch | Enforce payment terms: 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy or LC at sight |
| Generic or inconsistent product specifications | Indicates lack of engineering control or quality focus | Require detailed technical drawings, material specs, and test reports |
| No IP protection agreement or NDA acceptance | Risk of design theft or unauthorized production | Require signed NDA and include IP clauses in contract |
| Poor English communication or delayed responses | Indicates limited technical support and potential miscommunication | Assign a bilingual sourcing agent or require dedicated account manager |
4. Recommended Best Practices for Secure Sourcing
- Engage a Local Sourcing Agent: Leverage bilingual professionals with industry-specific knowledge to conduct audits and manage QC.
- Use Secure Payment Methods: Prefer Letters of Credit (LC) or Alibaba Trade Assurance for initial orders.
- Contractual Clarity: Define quality standards, delivery timelines, penalties for non-compliance, and IP ownership in written contracts.
- Implement Ongoing QC: Enforce pre-shipment inspections (PSI) and random batch testing for long-term partnerships.
Conclusion
Sourcing disc car horns from China requires rigorous verification to ensure product quality, compliance, and supply chain integrity. By systematically validating manufacturer legitimacy, differentiating between factories and trading companies, and avoiding common red flags, procurement managers can mitigate risk and establish resilient supplier relationships.
Global procurement teams are advised to adopt a zero-tolerance policy for opacity and prioritize transparency, technical capability, and compliance above cost savings alone.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
China Manufacturing Intelligence & Supply Chain Assurance
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Verified Pro List: Strategic Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Focus: Automotive Components (Disc Car Horns)
The Critical Challenge: Sourcing Disc Car Horns from China
Global automotive procurement faces acute pressure: supply chain volatility, quality compliance risks, and extended lead times directly impact production schedules. Traditional sourcing for China disc car horn factories involves:
– 4–8 weeks of unverified supplier screening
– High risk of counterfeit certifications (e.g., fake ISO/TS 16949)
– 30%+ failure rate in initial quality audits due to misrepresented capabilities
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Is Your 2026 Risk Mitigation Tool
Our AI-validated, on-ground-audited Pro List eliminates guesswork for disc car horn factories. Unlike public directories (Alibaba, Made-in-China), every supplier undergoes:
✅ Triple-layer verification (legal docs, production capacity, export history)
✅ Automotive-specific compliance checks (EMC, ROHS, IP67 waterproofing)
✅ Real-time capacity tracking (avoiding “middleman traps”)
Time-to-Procurement Comparison: Traditional vs. SourcifyChina Pro List
| Activity | Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Supplier Screening | 22–35 days | < 48 hours | 92% |
| Quality Audit Coordination | 14–21 days | Pre-verified | 100% |
| MOQ/Negotiation Cycles | 8–12 rounds | 3–5 rounds | 60% |
| Total Lead Time to PO | 63–89 days | ≤ 22 days | ≥ 65% |
Source: 2025 SourcifyChina Client Data (27 Automotive Tier-1 Suppliers)
Your Strategic Advantage in 2026
- Zero Compliance Surprises: All Pro List factories meet EU ECE R97 / US FMVSS 101 standards.
- Cost Transparency: Direct FOB pricing (no hidden trading company markups).
- Scalability Guarantee: Minimum 50% spare capacity verified pre-engagement.
- Risk Coverage: SourcifyChina backs every Pro List supplier with a 100% production defect reimbursement clause.
“Using SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our disc horn qualification time from 11 weeks to 9 days. We avoided 3 suppliers with falsified IATF 16949 certs.”
— Director of Sourcing, German Auto Tier-1 Supplier (Q3 2025 Client)
🔑 Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Supply Chain Now
Do not risk production delays with unverified suppliers. In 2026, automotive procurement leaders will differentiate through speed-to-verification, not just cost.
👉 Take 60 Seconds to Eliminate Sourcing Risk:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “Disc Horn Pro List – [Your Company]”
2. WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for immediate access to:
– Factory compliance dossiers (including recent audit videos)
– Real-time capacity reports for 120mm/150mm disc horn models
– Tiered pricing templates (MOQ 500–5,000 units)
Your next production run starts with a verified supplier—not a gamble.
Contact us by [Current Date + 7 days] for a complimentary 2026 Supply Chain Resilience Assessment.
SourcifyChina | Trusted by 387 Automotive Procurement Teams Since 2018
This report reflects verified 2025 data. Pro List access requires SourcifyChina Enterprise Membership (Free Tier-1 Audit Included).
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
