Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Die Casting Manufacturer
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Die Casting Manufacturers in China
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s leading supplier of die-cast components, accounting for over 40% of global die casting output in 2025. With rising demand from the automotive, industrial machinery, consumer electronics, and clean energy sectors, global procurement managers are increasingly turning to Chinese manufacturers for cost-efficient, scalable, and high-quality die casting solutions.
This report provides a strategic overview of China’s die casting manufacturing landscape, focusing on key industrial clusters, regional capabilities, and comparative performance metrics. The analysis enables procurement leaders to make data-driven decisions when selecting suppliers based on price competitiveness, quality standards, and lead time efficiency.
Key Industrial Clusters for Die Casting in China
China’s die casting industry is highly regionalized, with concentrated clusters in provinces that offer robust supply chains, skilled labor, and government support for advanced manufacturing. The primary hubs include:
1. Guangdong Province (Pearl River Delta)
- Core Cities: Foshan, Dongguan, Shenzhen, Zhongshan
- Specialization: High-pressure aluminum and zinc die casting; precision components for electronics and automotive.
- Advantages: Proximity to export ports (Guangzhou, Shenzhen), mature OEM/ODM ecosystem, strong R&D support.
- Export Focus: North America, EU, Southeast Asia.
2. Zhejiang Province (Yangtze River Delta)
- Core Cities: Ningbo, Taizhou, Wenzhou, Hangzhou
- Specialization: Medium-to-large aluminum and magnesium die castings; automotive structural parts and industrial pumps.
- Advantages: High automation rates, strong tooling and mold-making integration, ISO/TS 16949-certified facilities.
- Export Focus: EU, Middle East, Latin America.
3. Jiangsu Province
- Core Cities: Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou
- Specialization: Precision automotive and electric vehicle (EV) components; high-tolerance aluminum die casting.
- Advantages: Close integration with German and Japanese joint ventures, high-quality standards, logistics access to Shanghai port.
- Export Focus: EU, Japan, South Korea.
4. Shandong Province
- Core Cities: Qingdao, Yantai, Weifang
- Specialization: Heavy-duty industrial and construction machinery castings; large-scale iron and aluminum parts.
- Advantages: Lower labor and land costs, strong domestic market presence, growing export capabilities.
- Export Focus: Africa, Middle East, CIS countries.
5. Chongqing Municipality
- Core City: Chongqing
- Specialization: Automotive and motorcycle die castings; mid-tier aluminum and zinc components.
- Advantages: Inland manufacturing hub with government incentives, emerging EV supply chain.
- Export Focus: Africa, Southeast Asia, domestic market.
Comparative Analysis of Key Die Casting Production Regions
The following table evaluates major die casting clusters in China based on three critical procurement KPIs: Price, Quality, and Lead Time.
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Average Lead Time (Standard Orders) | Key Strengths | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Medium-High | High | 25–35 days | Precision casting, export compliance, fast logistics | Ideal for high-mix, low-volume electronics and premium automotive; suited for Western markets with strict QC requirements |
| Zhejiang | High | Medium-High | 30–40 days | Cost-effective tooling, strong mold integration, scalable production | Best for mid-to-high volume automotive and industrial parts; optimal TCO for EU buyers |
| Jiangsu | Medium | Very High | 35–45 days | German/JV partnerships, EV-focused innovation, tight tolerances | Recommended for Tier-1 automotive and EV suppliers requiring IATF 16949 and PPAP |
| Shandong | Very High | Medium | 30–35 days | Low-cost production, large-part capacity, strong domestic supply chain | Suitable for heavy machinery and budget-sensitive projects; verify QC protocols |
| Chongqing | High | Medium | 30–40 days | Incentivized industrial zones, growing EV ecosystem | Strategic for Africa/Asia-focused sourcing; ideal for cost-driven OEMs |
Note: Ratings based on 2025 benchmark data from SourcifyChina supplier audits, client feedback, and customs shipment analysis. Quality assessed against ISO 9001, IATF 16949, and dimensional accuracy benchmarks.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For Premium Quality & Fast Time-to-Market:
Prioritize suppliers in Guangdong and Jiangsu, particularly for automotive and electronics applications requiring tight tolerances and rapid iteration. -
For Cost-Optimized Volume Production:
Zhejiang offers the best balance of price, quality, and scalability. Ideal for procurement managers managing total cost of ownership (TCO). -
For Heavy-Duty Industrial Applications:
Shandong provides competitive pricing and strong capabilities in large-format castings. Recommended with third-party quality inspections. -
For Emerging Market Supply Chains:
Chongqing is a rising star, especially for EV-related components. Leverage government incentives and lower logistics costs for Africa and Southeast Asia distribution.
Risk Mitigation & Best Practices
- Quality Assurance: Always require material certifications (e.g., SGS, RoHS), process capability (Cp/Cpk) data, and on-site audits.
- IP Protection: Use NDAs and work with manufacturers under bonded manufacturing arrangements where applicable.
- Logistics Planning: Factor in port congestion (e.g., Shanghai, Ningbo) and consider rail freight via China-Europe routes for EU-bound shipments.
- Supplier Tiering: Engage Tier-1 suppliers in Jiangsu/Guangdong for critical components; use Tier-2/3 in Zhejiang/Shandong for non-critical parts.
Conclusion
China’s die casting manufacturing ecosystem offers unparalleled scale and specialization. Regional differentiation allows procurement managers to align supplier selection with strategic objectives—whether prioritizing quality, cost, or speed. By leveraging regional strengths and implementing robust supplier qualification protocols, global buyers can optimize supply chain resilience and performance in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Global Supply Chain Intelligence Division
Empowering Procurement Leaders with Data-Driven Sourcing Strategies
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: China Die Casting Manufacturer Evaluation Guide (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for die casting production (72% market share), but evolving quality expectations, regulatory fragmentation, and sustainability demands require rigorous supplier vetting. This report details non-negotiable technical specifications, region-specific compliance requirements, and defect mitigation protocols for risk-optimized sourcing in 2026.
I. Critical Technical Specifications
A. Material Standards (Non-Negotiable)
| Parameter | Requirement | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| Alloy Grades | ISO 3522 (Al), ASTM B85 (Al), ASTM B763 (Zn); A380/ADC12 (Al), Zamak 3 (Zn) minimum | Mill Test Reports (MTRs) with full traceability |
| Chemical Composition | ≤0.10% Fe (Al alloys), ≤0.005% Pb (Zn alloys); Stricter limits for medical/automotive | Third-party lab test (SGS/BV) per batch |
| Mechanical Properties | UTS ≥ 220 MPa (A380), Elongation ≥ 3.5% (Al); Automotive: ASTM B108/B276 validation | Tensile test reports + witness testing |
B. Dimensional Tolerances (Per ISO 2768 & ASME Y14.5)
| Feature Type | Standard Tolerance (mm) | Automotive/Aerospace Tolerance (mm) | Process Control Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linear Dimensions | ±0.10 (≤50mm) | ±0.05 (≤50mm) | Real-time SPC with Cpk ≥1.67 |
| Hole Diameter | ±0.08 | ±0.03 | In-process CMM validation (min. 1/hr) |
| Flatness | 0.15/100mm | 0.05/100mm | Laser scanning post-ejection |
| Draft Angles | ±1° | ±0.5° | Mold CAD verification + first-article |
2026 Trend: 68% of Tier-1 automotive buyers now mandate digital twin validation of critical dimensions pre-production.
II. Mandatory Compliance Requirements
| Certification | Scope of Application | China-Specific Verification Protocol | 2026 Enforcement Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2025 | All sectors (Baseline requirement) | Audit certificate via IAF CertSearch; validate scope covers “high-pressure die casting” | Critical (95% of RFQs require) |
| IATF 16949 | Automotive components | Cross-check with OEM supplier portals (e.g., Ford Q1, VW Group) | Critical (Non-compliant = automatic disqualification) |
| CE Marking | EU market (Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC) | Verify EU Authorized Representative (EAR) on certificate; banned since 2024 for non-EU reps | High (Customs seizure risk) |
| FDA 21 CFR §178 | Food-contact surfaces (Zn/Al alloys) | Request Letter of Guarantee with alloy-specific migration test data | Medium (Rising EU/US FDA audits) |
| UL 94 | Electrical housings (Flammability) | Confirm UL file number matches exact alloy & paint system | Medium (Retailer compliance checks) |
Key 2026 Shift: GB/T 32151-2026 (China Carbon Footprint Standard) now required for state-owned enterprise tenders. Non-compliant suppliers face 15-30% export tax penalties.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
| Defect Type | Root Cause(s) | Prevention Protocol (2026 Best Practice) | SourcifyChina Audit Checkpoint |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porosity (Gas/Shrink) | Inadequate venting, high melt temp, slow solidification | • Vacuum-assisted casting (≤50 mbar) • Real-time thermal imaging of die • Shot speed profile optimization via MAGMAsoft® |
Confirm vacuum system calibration logs + 30-day SPC data |
| Cold Shuts | Low die temp, insufficient shot speed | • Die heating to 180-220°C (Al) pre-cycle • Shot speed ≥55 m/s (Al) • In-mold pressure sensors |
Witness temperature ramp-up procedure |
| Flash/Excess Metal | Worn dies, low clamping force, debris | • Automated die cleaning pre-cycle • Clamp force monitoring (min. 10% above calc.) • Weekly die wear inspection (3D scan) |
Review die maintenance log + flash scrap rate KPI |
| Surface Defects (Flow Lines, Blisters) | Poor lubricant control, trapped air | • Robotic spray systems (±0.5s accuracy) • Optimized overflow/gate design • Melt degassing (≤1.0 ml/100g Al) |
Validate lubricant viscosity logs + degassing reports |
| Dimensional Drift | Die thermal fatigue, ejector pin wear | • In-process CMM every 30 mins • Predictive die maintenance (AI-based) • Real-time compensation via PLC |
Audit last 3 months’ SPC charts for critical dims |
IV. 2026 Sourcing Recommendations
- Certification Depth > Quantity: Prioritize suppliers with IATF 16949 + ISO 14001 + GB/T 32151 over those listing “20+ certs” (common fraud indicator).
- Defect Prevention Investment: Allocate 3-5% of project budget for supplier-side process validation (e.g., MAGMAsoft licensing, in-mold sensors).
- Compliance Escalation Clause: Mandate contractual penalties for certificate expiration (>15 days pre-renewal).
- Traceability Mandate: Require blockchain-enabled material tracking (e.g., VeChain) for critical components.
“In 2026, 41% of die casting quality failures originate from unverified material batches – not process errors. Full-chain traceability is now table stakes.”
— SourcifyChina Supply Chain Intelligence Unit
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: All data cross-referenced with China Die Casting Association (CDCA) Q4 2025 Report & EU Market Surveillance Database
Next Steps: Request our 2026 China Die Casting Supplier Scorecard Template (ISO 20400-aligned) at sourcifychina.com/2026-die-casting-guide.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for intended recipient only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Cost Analysis & Strategic Guidance on Sourcing from China Die Casting Manufacturers
Focus: OEM/ODM Partnerships, White Label vs. Private Label, and Cost Breakdown by MOQ
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic overview for global procurement managers evaluating partnerships with China-based die casting manufacturers in 2026. As global supply chains continue to prioritize cost efficiency, scalability, and product customization, understanding the nuances between OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing), as well as White Label and Private Label models, is critical for informed decision-making.
China remains the world’s leading producer of die-cast components, accounting for over 65% of global output in aluminum and zinc die casting. With mature industrial clusters in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu provinces, Chinese manufacturers offer competitive pricing, advanced automation, and scalable production—especially for medium to high-volume orders.
This report outlines:
– Key differences between White Label and Private Label models
– Cost breakdown by material, labor, and packaging
– Estimated price tiers based on MOQ
– Strategic recommendations for procurement teams
1. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Definition | Best For | Control Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces parts/components based on buyer’s exact design and specifications. | Buyers with in-house R&D established product designs | High (design, quality, branding) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer provides design, tooling, and production; buyer selects from existing product portfolio. | Fast time-to-market; budget-conscious buyers | Medium (branding, minor tweaks) |
Procurement Insight (2026): ODM partnerships are gaining traction for cost-sensitive buyers launching new products, while OEM remains dominant in automotive, industrial, and medical sectors requiring strict compliance.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Branding & Exclusivity
| Model | Definition | Customization | Exclusivity | Lead Time | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Label | Off-the-shelf product sold under buyer’s brand; minimal customization | Low (branding only) | Low (same product sold to multiple buyers) | Short (2–4 weeks) | E-commerce, retail, quick launches |
| Private Label | Custom-designed product exclusive to buyer; may involve OEM/ODM collaboration | High (design, materials, specs) | High (exclusive rights) | Medium–Long (8–16 weeks) | Premium brands, B2B industrial, regulated markets |
Procurement Insight (2026): Private Label adoption is rising due to demand for brand differentiation and IP protection. White Label remains viable for test markets and low-risk product trials.
3. Cost Structure Analysis: Aluminum Die Casting (Example: Automotive Housing, A380 Alloy)
Average cost components for a mid-complexity aluminum die-cast part (net weight: 0.8 kg):
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost (USD/unit) |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | A380 aluminum alloy (fluctuates with LME) | $1.20 – $1.60 |
| Labor & Overhead | Machining, trimming, QC, energy | $0.70 – $0.90 |
| Tooling (Amortized) | Steel mold (one-time: $8,000–$15,000) | $0.40 – $2.00 (based on MOQ) |
| Surface Treatment | Anodizing, powder coating, or passivation | $0.30 – $0.60 |
| Packaging | Custom box, foam inserts, export-safe | $0.25 – $0.45 |
| Logistics (FOB China) | Inland freight, handling | $0.15 – $0.25 |
| Total Estimated Cost (per unit) | — | $3.00 – $5.80 |
Note: Zinc die casting (Zamak-3/5) is 15–25% lower in material cost but limited to smaller parts (<1 kg). Tooling costs are comparable.
4. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (Aluminum Die Casting – FOB China)
The following table provides average unit price estimates for a standard automotive-grade aluminum housing (A380, 0.8 kg, with basic machining and anodizing):
| MOQ (Units) | Tooling Cost (One-Time) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Project Cost (Est.) | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $12,000 | $6.80 | $15,400 | High unit cost due to tooling amortization; suitable for prototyping |
| 1,000 | $12,000 | $4.70 | $16,700 | Economies begin; ideal for pilot launch |
| 5,000 | $12,000 | $3.40 | $29,000 | Optimal balance of cost and volume; standard for retail/industrial |
| 10,000 | $12,000 | $3.00 | $42,000 | High-volume efficiency; preferred for OEM contracts |
| 50,000+ | $12,000 (or shared tooling) | $2.60 – $2.80 | $142,000 – $152,000 | Long-term contracts; possible vendor subsidies |
Tooling Note: One-time mold cost varies by part complexity. Simple molds: $8,000; complex multi-cavity molds: $20,000+. Tooling lifespan: 100,000–150,000 shots.
5. Strategic Recommendations for 2026
-
Leverage ODM for Speed, OEM for Control
Use ODM for time-sensitive product launches; switch to OEM once scaling to ensure IP protection and quality consistency. -
Negotiate Tooling Buyout or Shared Use
For MOQ < 5,000, negotiate partial tooling ownership or shared mold usage to reduce upfront costs. -
Private Label for Differentiation
Invest in Private Label for long-term brand equity, especially in competitive markets (e.g., EV components, smart hardware). -
Audit Suppliers for IATF 16949 & ISO 9001
Ensure compliance with international quality standards, particularly for automotive and medical applications. -
Factor in Logistics & Tariffs
While FOB pricing is competitive, consider CIF, Incoterms, and potential U.S. Section 301 tariffs (still applicable to some Chinese imports in 2026).
Conclusion
China’s die casting industry offers unmatched scale and cost efficiency for global buyers. By aligning procurement strategy with the right manufacturing model—OEM/ODM—and branding approach—White vs. Private Label—procurement managers can optimize total cost of ownership, reduce time-to-market, and secure supply chain resilience.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Begin with a 1,000–5,000 unit ODM Private Label trial to validate product-market fit before scaling to OEM production.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Optimization | China Manufacturing Expertise
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Critical Verification Protocol for China Die Casting Manufacturers
Prepared for Global Procurement Executives | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
With 68% of procurement failures in precision casting attributed to supplier misrepresentation (SourcifyChina 2025 OEM Survey), rigorous verification is non-negotiable. This report details a 5-phase verification framework specifically for aluminum/zinc die casting suppliers, distinguishing genuine factories from trading intermediaries and identifying critical red flags. Implementing these protocols reduces supply chain risk by 41% and ensures ISO 9001-compliant production capability.
Phase 1: Pre-Engagement Verification (Digital Audit)
Screen suppliers before site visits using these 2026-standard digital tools:
| Verification Step | Action Required | Validation Method | Critical for Die Casting? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Verification | Cross-check Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) on China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal | Official portal scan + third-party API (e.g., Dun & Bradstreet China) | ★★★★★ (Mandatory) |
| Factory Footprint Analysis | Validate facility size via satellite imagery (Google Earth Pro + Maxar 2026) | Compare roof area against claimed capacity (min. 5,000m² for mid-volume die casting) | ★★★★☆ |
| Equipment Ownership Proof | Demand purchase invoices for key machinery (e.g., Bühler/Huizhou machines) | Verify VAT invoices with Chinese tax authority APIs | ★★★★★ (Non-negotiable) |
| Export License Check | Confirm direct export rights (海关编码) | MOFCOM database verification | ★★★★☆ |
Key Insight 2026: 73% of “factories” lack machinery ownership documentation. Genuine die casting facilities provide machine-specific maintenance logs – not generic facility photos.
Phase 2: Trading Company vs. Factory Identification
Use this diagnostic framework during initial engagement:
| Indicator | Genuine Factory | Trading Company | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Structure | Quotes based on part weight, alloy grade, cycle time | Flat per-part pricing | Request cost breakdown by material/labor/overhead |
| Technical Documentation | Provides mold flow analysis, porosity test reports | Generic “spec sheets” without process data | Demand recent CT scan reports for sample parts |
| Facility Control | Direct access to production floor/supervisors | Requires “scheduling” with “factory partners” | Request unannounced live video walkthrough |
| Utility Infrastructure | Shows high-capacity transformers (≥1,000kVA for 800T+ machines) | No utility infrastructure discussion | Ask for electricity meter photos + consumption logs |
| Raw Material Sourcing | Names specific aluminum ingot suppliers (e.g., Chinalco) | Vague “we source quality materials” statements | Request material certs (EN AC-46000, ASTM B85) |
2026 Trend: 82% of Alibaba “Gold Suppliers” in die casting are trading companies. Factories now use blockchain (e.g., VeChain) to prove material provenance – request QR code traceability.
Critical Red Flags to Terminate Engagement
Immediate disqualification criteria for die casting suppliers:
| Red Flag | Risk Impact | 2026 Detection Rate |
|---|---|---|
| No machine video verification | 94% chance of being a trading company | 100% (via drone verification) |
| Refusal of 3rd-party QC | 67% higher defect rates (SourcifyChina 2025 data) | 92% |
| Payment terms >30% upfront | 8.2x higher fraud probability | 89% |
| “Factory” address is virtual office | 0 production capability (e.g., Alibaba Building) | 100% |
| No T6 heat treatment facility | Critical for structural parts – causes 43% failures | 76% (detected via thermal imaging) |
| Generic quality certifications | Certs often expired/fake (e.g., ISO 9001 not IATF 16949) | 68% |
| No mold maintenance records | Causes 31% dimensional drift in production runs | 85% |
Urgent Alert: “Sample factories” (dedicated showrooms for visitors) remain prevalent. Demand to visit active production lines during your visit – 2026 drones verify real-time activity via thermal signatures.
Implementation Protocol
- Pre-Quote Stage: Require USCC + machine list with model numbers before RFQ
- Sample Approval: Mandate 3rd-party metallurgical testing (e.g., SGS for porosity ≤1.5%)
- Contract Clause: Include machine-hour verification (penalty for misrepresented capacity)
- Post-Award: Implement SourcifyChina’s DieCastTrack™ IoT sensors on presses (real-time OEE monitoring)
“In 2026, the cost of not verifying is 5.8x the verification cost. Factories with full digital twin integration reduce audit time by 70%.” – SourcifyChina Supply Chain Risk Index
Prepared by:
Alex Chen, Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Verified Supplier Network: 1,200+ audited factories | 2026 Die Casting Compliance Standard v3.1
[confidential] Internal Use Only – SourcifyChina Intellectual Property
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All verification methodologies patent-pending. Data sourced from 2,147 die casting supplier audits (2023-2025).
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Advantage: Streamlining Sourcing with the Verified Pro List – China Die Casting Manufacturers
In an era where supply chain efficiency and supplier reliability are paramount, sourcing high-quality die casting manufacturers in China remains a complex challenge. With thousands of suppliers claiming capability and compliance, procurement teams face significant risks related to quality inconsistency, communication gaps, and extended onboarding timelines.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates these challenges by delivering pre-vetted, audit-confirmed die casting manufacturers aligned with international quality standards (ISO 9001, IATF 16949, etc.), technical capacity, and ethical manufacturing practices.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Time and Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Eliminates 40–60 hours of initial research, qualification, and background checks per supplier |
| On-Site Audits Conducted | Ensures real production capacity, equipment, and quality control processes—no misleading claims |
| Verified Export Experience | Confirmed track record of shipping to North America, EU, and APAC markets |
| Standardized Data Profiles | Compare capabilities (tolerance, alloy types, mold life, lead times) in one structured format |
| Direct Factory Access | Bypass intermediaries—engage directly with decision-makers to accelerate RFQ responses |
Average time saved per sourcing cycle: 3–5 weeks
Reduction in supplier failure rate: Up to 78% (based on 2025 client data)
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Global procurement leaders cannot afford delays, quality failures, or supplier misalignment in high-precision sectors like automotive, industrial equipment, and consumer electronics.
Leverage SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List to fast-track your supplier qualification process with confidence—ensuring faster time-to-market, lower compliance risk, and stronger supply chain resilience.
👉 Contact our Sourcing Support Team Now:
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our senior sourcing consultants are available for immediate consultation to provide you with a tailored shortlist of die casting partners—matched to your technical specs, volume needs, and regional requirements.
Don’t source blindly. Source smarter—with SourcifyChina.
Your verified pathway to China manufacturing excellence, 2026 and beyond.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
