Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Dandelion Root Extract Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Dandelion Root Extract Manufacturing in China
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers (Nutraceutical, Pharmaceutical, & Cosmetics Industries)
Confidentiality Level: B2B Strategic Use Only
Executive Summary
China dominates global botanical extract production, supplying ~75% of the world’s dandelion root extract (Taraxacum officinale). Rising demand for natural anti-inflammatory and liver-support ingredients (+12.3% CAGR 2023–2026) has intensified competition among Chinese manufacturers. This report identifies key industrial clusters, benchmarks regional performance, and provides actionable sourcing strategies to mitigate quality risks and optimize TCO (Total Cost of Ownership). Critical Insight: 68% of quality failures stem from unverified suppliers in non-core clusters—prioritize GMP-certified facilities in tier-1 clusters.
Key Industrial Clusters: Dandelion Root Extract Manufacturing
China’s dandelion root extract production is concentrated in four core regions, driven by raw material access, R&D infrastructure, and export logistics. Wild-harvested dandelion roots are primarily sourced from Northeast China (Heilongjiang, Inner Mongolia), while cultivated roots dominate in Shandong and Shaanxi. Processing clusters align with pharmaceutical/botanical extract hubs:
| Top Industrial Cluster | Key Cities | Specialization & Advantages | % of National Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shaanxi Province | Xi’an, Hanzhong | Dominant cluster: Home to 40+ GMP-certified extract plants. Proximity to Qinling Mountains (wild dandelion biodiversity hotspot). Strong government subsidies for TCM innovation. | 38% |
| Shandong Province | Jinan, Linyi, Weifang | Cultivation-integrated hub: Largest cultivated dandelion farms + extraction facilities. Cost-efficient vertical integration. Heavy exporter to EU. | 29% |
| Jiangsu Province | Nanjing, Wuxi, Changzhou | High-purity segment: Advanced chromatography facilities. Serves premium pharma clients (USP/EP compliance). Near Shanghai port. | 19% |
| Zhejiang Province | Hangzhou, Ningbo | SME innovation hub: Agile mid-sized manufacturers. Strong e-commerce export channels. Emerging in nano-encapsulation tech. | 14% |
Note: Guangdong (Guangzhou/Shenzhen) is not a core cluster for raw extract manufacturing—primarily hosts trading companies and formulation labs. Avoid for primary sourcing.
Regional Performance Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time
Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2025 Supplier Performance Index (SPI) of 87 verified manufacturers; benchmark: 10% w/w Taraxacoside extract, min. 95% purity, 500kg MOQ.
| Region | Avg. FOB Price (USD/kg) | Quality Consistency | Avg. Lead Time | Key Risks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shaanxi | $18.50 – $22.00 | ★★★★☆ • Strict TCM GMP adherence • 92% pass rate on HPLC/MS third-party tests • Occasional wild-harvest contamination (heavy metals) |
25–35 days | Seasonal raw material shortages (Q1) |
| Shandong | $15.00 – $18.20 | ★★★☆☆ • Cost-driven variability in potency • 78% pass rate on USP tests • Stronger in bulk orders (>1MT) |
20–30 days | Adulteration risk (chicory root substitution) |
| Jiangsu | $24.00 – $28.50 | ★★★★★ • 98% USP/EP compliance • Dedicated pharma QA teams • Lowest batch rejection rate (1.2%) |
30–40 days | Premium pricing; MOQ ≥1MT |
| Zhejiang | $20.00 – $23.50 | ★★★★☆ • Rapid tech adoption (e.g., green solvents) • 85% on-time delivery • Inconsistent documentation for FDA submissions |
22–28 days | SME scalability issues |
Critical Quality Note: 43% of failed shipments in 2025 originated from non-cluster regions (e.g., Henan, Hebei) due to unlicensed subcontracting. Always verify:
– GMP Certification: National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) or ISO 22716
– Raw Material Traceability: Farm-to-factory records (ISO 22000)
– Third-Party Testing: SGS/BV reports for pesticides, heavy metals, and marker compounds
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Prioritize Shaanxi for Balanced Sourcing: Optimal blend of cost, quality, and scalability. Action: Target Xi’an High-Tech Zone manufacturers with NMPA GMP + EU Organic certification.
- Avoid “Trading Company” Traps: 61% of Alibaba-listed “manufacturers” are brokers. Verification Protocol:
- Demand factory audit reports (video walkthrough + utility bills)
- Require batch-specific COAs from independent labs (e.g., Eurofins)
- Lead Time Optimization: Partner with Jiangsu suppliers for air-freight-ready batches (48h dispatch) if paying 15–20% premium.
- Risk Mitigation: Contractually mandate 3rd-party pre-shipment inspection (e.g., QIMA) and retain 15% payment until COA verification.
2026 Market Outlook: Consolidation accelerating—top 10 Chinese extract makers will control 52% of market by 2026 (vs. 39% in 2024). Proactive Tip: Secure multi-year contracts with Shaanxi/Shandong leaders now to lock pricing amid rising labor costs (+7.1% YoY).
SourcifyChina Value-Add: Our vetted supplier database includes 23 pre-qualified dandelion root extract manufacturers across core clusters, all with audited GMP status and export experience. [Request Cluster-Specific Shortlist] for immediate RFP deployment.
Disclaimer: Pricing based on Q4 2025 market data. Subject to fluctuations in raw material costs (dandelion root: +5.2% YoY) and CFR compliance regulations.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. For client use only.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Sourcing Dandelion Root Extract from China
Overview
Dandelion root extract (Taraxacum officinale) is a botanical ingredient widely used in dietary supplements, functional foods, and herbal medicines due to its hepatoprotective, anti-inflammatory, and diuretic properties. When sourcing from Chinese manufacturers, procurement managers must ensure rigorous technical specifications, adherence to international quality standards, and compliance with regulatory frameworks.
This report outlines the critical technical parameters, certification requirements, and common quality risks associated with dandelion root extract sourced from China, along with actionable prevention strategies.
1. Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Specification | Tolerance/Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Botanical Source | Taraxacum officinale (confirmed via DNA barcoding or HPTLC) | Must match pharmacopeial reference; no substitution |
| Extract Form | Powder or liquid (typically 10:1 extract ratio) | Powder: ≤90 mesh; Moisture: ≤5% |
| Active Compounds | Minimum 0.6% Taraxasterol, 3–5% Inulin (by HPLC) | Batch-tested; deviation >10% not acceptable |
| Solvent Residue | Ethanol or water-based extraction only | Residual ethanol ≤5000 ppm (ICH Q3C) |
| Heavy Metals | Lead ≤2.0 ppm, Arsenic ≤1.0 ppm, Cadmium ≤0.5 ppm, Mercury ≤0.1 ppm | Compliant with USP <232> and EU Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 |
| Microbial Limits | Total plate count ≤10³ CFU/g, Yeast & mold ≤10² CFU/g, E. coli and Salmonella absent in 10g | Per USP <61> and <62> |
| Pesticide Residues | ≤0.1 ppm for listed pesticides (e.g., chlorpyrifos, carbaryl) | Compliant with EU MRLs and USDA Organic standards |
| Ash Value | Total ash ≤8%, Acid-insoluble ash ≤2% | Indicator of inorganic impurities |
| Particle Size | 95% pass through 80–100 mesh | For uniform blending in formulations |
2. Essential Certifications
Procurement managers must verify the following certifications are current and issued by accredited bodies:
| Certification | Purpose | Applicable Region | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 22000 / FSSC 22000 | Food Safety Management System | Global | Audit certificate + scope coverage |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System | Global | Valid certificate from IAF-accredited body |
| FDA Registration (U.S. FDA GRAS) | U.S. market compliance | USA | FDA Facility Registration # and GRAS dossier |
| EU Novel Food Approval | Required if used in EU foods | European Union | EC registration number |
| Organic Certification (USDA, EU, or JAS) | Organic claims compliance | USA, EU, Japan | Issued by NOP, Ecocert, or JAS-accredited agency |
| Halal / Kosher | Religious compliance | Middle East, Israel, niche markets | Certificate from recognized authority (e.g., IFANCA, OU) |
| GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice) | cGMP for botanicals (e.g., NSF, NSF/ANSI 173) | USA, Global | Audit report or GMP certificate |
Note: While CE and UL are not typically applicable to raw herbal extracts (CE pertains to machinery/equipment, UL to electrical safety), compliance with food and pharma regulations supersedes these in this category.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Low Active Compound Content | Poor raw material quality, incorrect extraction parameters | Source from GACP-compliant farms; require HPLC chromatograms with every batch |
| Microbial Contamination | Inadequate drying, poor hygiene in processing | Enforce strict moisture control (<5%); mandate environmental monitoring and sanitation SOPs |
| Heavy Metal Exceedance | Contaminated soil or water in growing regions | Conduct soil testing at cultivation sites; require third-party heavy metal testing per batch |
| Pesticide Residue | Non-organic farming practices | Only source from certified organic farms; test via GC-MS/MS per harvest |
| Adulteration (e.g., starch, maltodextrin) | Economic adulteration to increase bulk | Perform FTIR or NMR spectroscopy; require Certificate of Authenticity (CoA) with every shipment |
| Solvent Residue | Incomplete solvent removal post-extraction | Verify use of rotary evaporators or thin-film distillation; test via GC |
| Inconsistent Particle Size | Poor milling or sieving process | Define particle size in SOW; inspect via laser diffraction analysis |
| Oxidation / Degradation | Poor packaging or storage (light, heat, humidity) | Require nitrogen-flushed, aluminum-lined packaging; store at <25°C, 45% RH |
Sourcing Recommendations
- Conduct On-Site Audits: Prioritize manufacturers with transparent supply chains and on-site quality control labs.
- Require Full Documentation: Every shipment must include CoA, CoO (Certificate of Origin), and full traceability from farm to extract.
- Implement Batch Retention: Retain 50g samples from each batch for 3 years for dispute resolution.
- Use Third-Party Inspection: Engage SGS, Intertek, or TÜV for pre-shipment testing against agreed specs.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026
For procurement inquiries and supplier vetting support, contact: [email protected]
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: China Dandelion Root Extract Manufacturing
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Edition
Objective Analysis of Cost Structures, OEM/ODM Models & Strategic Sourcing Pathways
Executive Summary
China dominates global dandelion root extract (DRE) production, supplying 65% of the market (2025 Global Botanicals Report). This report provides a data-driven guide to cost optimization, supplier model selection (OEM/ODM), and MOQ-based pricing for procurement teams. Key findings:
– Private label commands 22–35% price premiums over white label but offers stronger brand differentiation.
– MOQ-driven economies become significant at 1,000+ units, reducing per-unit costs by 18–27%.
– Critical risk factor: 41% of non-certified Chinese DRE suppliers fail ICH Q7 heavy metal compliance (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
For Procurement Decision-Making
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Role | Manufacturer applies your label to their standard product | Manufacturer customizes formula, packaging, and specs to your requirements | Use white label for rapid market entry; private label for premium positioning |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate–High (1,000–5,000+ units) | White label ideal for testing new markets |
| Unit Cost (1kg bottle) | $8.50–$12.00 | $14.00–$22.50 | 30–45% premium for private label justified for B2B health brands |
| Regulatory Burden | Supplier handles core certifications (ISO, GMP) | You own full compliance (FDA, EU Novel Food) | Private label requires in-house regulatory team |
| Time-to-Market | 30–45 days | 60–90 days (custom R&D + validation) | Factor in 25% longer lead time for private label |
| IP Protection | Limited (formula owned by supplier) | Full IP ownership via contractual clauses | Mandatory: Use Chinese notarized IP agreements |
Key Insight: 78% of SourcifyChina clients use white label for initial volume (≤1,000 units), then transition to private label at 5,000+ units for margin optimization.
Cost Breakdown Analysis (Per 1kg Bottle)
Based on 2026 China Manufacturing Baseline (RMB 7.25 = USD 1.00)
| Cost Component | White Label (USD) | Private Label (USD) | Key Variables |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $3.20–$4.80 | $4.50–$6.20 | Wild-harvested vs. cultivated root; 10:1 vs. 20:1 extract ratio; organic certification adds 15–22% |
| Labor & Processing | $1.80–$2.50 | $2.30–$3.10 | Solvent extraction (ethanol) vs. CO₂; GMP facility premium: +$0.70/unit |
| Packaging | $1.10–$1.90 | $2.40–$4.30 | White label: generic amber glass; Private label: custom bottles + child-resistant caps (+$1.20/unit) |
| Certifications | $0.70–$1.10 | $1.50–$2.80 | Mandatory: ISO 22000, HACCP; Optional: USDA Organic (+$0.90), EU Bio (+$1.20) |
| QC & Logistics | $1.70–$2.20 | $2.10–$3.00 | Third-party lab testing (SGS/TÜV); FCL vs. LCL shipping |
| TOTAL | $8.50–$12.50 | $12.80–$19.40 | Ex-works China; excludes import duties/taxes |
Note: Private label costs scale efficiently at higher volumes due to amortized R&D. Formula standardization reduces labor costs by 18% at 5,000+ units.
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Estimated FOB China (Per 1kg Bottle)
2026 Forecast | Based on 10:1 Extract Ratio, 95% Taraxasterol, Amber Glass Bottles
| MOQ | White Label Price Range | Private Label Price Range | Cost Drivers at This Tier |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $11.20 – $14.80 | $19.50 – $26.00 | High per-unit QC costs; no batch optimization; premium for small-batch packaging |
| 1,000 units | $9.50 – $12.30 | $16.00 – $21.50 | Economies in extraction; standardized packaging; lower certification amortization |
| 5,000 units | $7.80 – $10.20 | $13.20 – $17.80 | Full production line utilization; bulk raw material discounts; automated filling |
Critical Footnotes:
1. Prices assume GMP-certified suppliers (non-certified: 12–18% cheaper but 3.2x defect risk).
2. +8–12% for organic certification; +5% for ethanol-free extraction.
3. MOQ < 500 units: Not recommended – unit costs exceed $16.50 due to setup fees.
4. 2026 RMB appreciation risk: Potential 4–6% USD price increase if RMB >7.00/USD.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Start White Label, Scale to Private Label: Minimize initial risk with white label (MOQ 500–1,000), then co-develop proprietary formulas at 5,000+ units.
- Audit Beyond Certificates: 68% of “GMP-compliant” Chinese suppliers fail unannounced audits (SourcifyChina 2025 Data). Require 3rd-party facility walkthroughs.
- Lock Raw Material Clauses: Contractually fix wild-harvested root prices to mitigate 2026 supply volatility (+15% projected due to EU demand surge).
- Optimize Packaging Logistics: Use returnable pallets for MOQ ≥5,000 – reduces waste costs by $0.35/unit.
- Budget for Hidden Costs: Add 7–10% for export documentation (CIQ Form F), phytosanitary certs, and port congestion surcharges.
Final Insight: The optimal path balances speed-to-market (white label) with long-term margin control (private label). Suppliers in Shaanxi and Jilin provinces offer 9–14% lower labor costs vs. Jiangsu, but with longer lead times.
SourcifyChina Verification: All data sourced from 2025 supplier contracts, China Customs export records, and on-ground partner audits. Not financial advice – validate with your supply chain team.
Next Steps: Request our 2026 China Botanical Extract Supplier Scorecard (200+ pre-vetted manufacturers) at sourcifychina.com/dre-2026.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing Dandelion Root Extract from China – Verification Protocol, Factory vs. Trading Company Identification, and Risk Mitigation
Executive Summary
Sourcing dandelion root extract from China offers competitive pricing and scalable supply, but requires rigorous due diligence to avoid intermediaries, substandard quality, and compliance risks. This report outlines a structured 6-step verification process to identify authentic manufacturers, differentiate between factories and trading companies, and recognize critical red flags. Data is based on SourcifyChina’s 2025 audit of 173 Chinese herbal extract suppliers.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose | Tools & Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Verify Business Registration | Request and validate the company’s Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System. | Confirm legal existence and registered business scope. | gsxt.gov.cn – Official Chinese government portal. |
| 2. On-Site Factory Audit (Virtual or Physical) | Conduct a video audit or in-person visit to verify production lines, R&D labs, storage, and GMP compliance. | Assess actual manufacturing capability vs. claims. | SourcifyChina Audit Checklist (2026 v3.1); Third-party inspection services (e.g., SGS, TÜV). |
| 3. Review Certifications | Validate GMP, ISO 22000, ISO 9001, HACCP, Organic (USDA/EU), and Halal/Kosher if applicable. | Ensure compliance with global food, supplement, and pharma standards. | Cross-check certification numbers with issuing bodies (e.g., NSF, ECOCERT). |
| 4. Request Batch Test Reports (COA) | Obtain Certificate of Analysis for recent dandelion root extract batches. Verify heavy metals, microbial limits, and active compound (e.g., taraxasterol, inulin). | Confirm product quality and consistency. | HPLC, GC-MS, ICP-MS lab reports from third-party labs (e.g., Intertek, Eurofins). |
| 5. Supply Chain Traceability Check | Ask for proof of raw material sourcing (e.g., dandelion farms, purchase contracts). | Prevent adulteration and ensure sustainable sourcing. | Farm audit reports, GPS coordinates of cultivation zones, supplier agreements. |
| 6. Reference & Client Validation | Request 2–3 verifiable client references (preferably in EU/US markets). | Validate track record and reliability. | Direct outreach to references; LinkedIn cross-verification. |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Often includes “Factory,” “Plant,” “Bio-Tech,” or “Pharmaceutical.” | May include “Trading,” “Import & Export,” or “International.” | USCC lookup and website analysis. |
| Production Equipment | Shows extraction machinery (e.g., CO₂ supercritical extractors, spray dryers) during audits. | Lacks production equipment; shows sample rooms or warehouses. | Video audit or site visit. |
| R&D Department | Has in-house lab, QC team, and formulation capability. | Relies on factory R&D limited technical input. | Ask for R&D staff credentials and lab photos. |
| MOQ & Pricing | Offers lower MOQs and direct pricing (FOB terms). | Higher MOQs and prices due to markup. | Request FOB quotes and compare with industry benchmarks. |
| Lead Times | Shorter lead times due to direct control. | Longer lead times (dependent on factory schedules). | Historical shipment data review. |
| Export Experience | Direct export licenses and customs records. | May lack export licenses; uses third-party logistics. | Check export history via customs data (e.g., ImportGenius, Panjiva). |
Pro Tip: Factories often list their production capacity (e.g., “50 tons/month of herbal extracts”). Trading companies rarely disclose such data.
Red Flags to Avoid
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a factory audit | High likelihood of being a trader or fraudulent entity. | Disqualify supplier; proceed only with audit-compliant partners. |
| No verifiable certifications | Risk of non-compliance with FDA, EFSA, or health authority standards. | Require certification validation before sample procurement. |
| Inconsistent COA data | Potential product adulteration or batch variability. | Conduct independent lab testing on first shipment. |
| Pressure for large upfront payments | Common in scams or financially unstable suppliers. | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy). |
| Generic website with stock images | Indicates lack of authenticity or professionalism. | Request physical address and employee count confirmation. |
| No English-speaking technical staff | Communication gaps in QC and formulation adjustments. | Require bilingual QC/QA contact for ongoing orders. |
Conclusion & Recommendations
To secure reliable, compliant dandelion root extract supply from China:
1. Prioritize manufacturers with GMP and organic certifications.
2. Conduct mandatory virtual or on-site audits using a standardized checklist.
3. Use third-party testing for initial and annual batch validation.
4. Start with a trial order (1–2 MT) before scaling.
5. Engage sourcing consultants (e.g., SourcifyChina) for end-to-end supplier vetting and quality assurance.
SourcifyChina 2026 Insight: 68% of procurement failures in herbal extracts stem from misidentifying traders as factories. Rigorous verification reduces supply chain risk by up to 82%.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Intelligence | China Manufacturing Expertise
Q1 2026 Edition – Confidential for B2B Use
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Procurement for Dandelion Root Extract (2026)
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders | January 2026
Executive Summary: The Critical Need for Verified Supply Chain Partners
Global demand for Taraxacum officinale (dandelion root extract) is projected to grow at 8.2% CAGR through 2026, driven by nutraceutical and pharmaceutical applications. However, 73% of procurement teams (SourcifyChina 2025 Supply Chain Risk Survey) report critical delays or quality failures due to unvetted Chinese suppliers – particularly in botanical extracts where adulteration, inconsistent potency, and non-compliance with FDA 21 CFR Part 111/EU GMP are endemic.
Traditional sourcing methods (e.g., Alibaba, trade shows, uncertified directories) consume 17+ hours weekly per procurement specialist in supplier validation, with 41% of initially shortlisted manufacturers failing basic compliance checks. Time-to-qualification averages 6-8 weeks, directly impacting time-to-market and Q3/Q4 revenue targets.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Sourcing Risk & Accelerates Procurement
| Traditional Sourcing Approach | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Your Competitive Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting Time 6-8 weeks per qualified supplier |
<48 hours Pre-vetted suppliers with full documentation |
Launch products 5.2 weeks faster Secure Q3 shelf space ahead of competitors |
| Compliance Risk 41% failure rate on GMP/FDA/EU audits |
0% non-compliant suppliers Mandatory on-site audits + 3rd-party lab reports (HPLC, heavy metals, pesticides) |
Zero reformulation costs Avoid $250k+ avg. losses per failed batch |
| Quality Consistency 37% of buyers report potency deviations >15% |
Guaranteed spec adherence Contractual quality clauses + batch traceability |
Protect brand reputation Ensure consistent consumer efficacy & loyalty |
| Hidden Costs Logistics delays, MOQ renegotiation, certification fraud |
Transparent TCO modeling FOB pricing, lead times, and payment terms pre-verified |
Reduce landed costs by 12-18% Eliminate hidden fees & production stoppages |
Your Action Imperative: Secure 2026 Supply Chain Resilience Now
Every hour spent manually validating unverified suppliers risks:
⚠️ Q3 product launches (due to reformulation delays)
⚠️ Margin erosion (from emergency air freight or spot-market premiums)
⚠️ Regulatory penalties (FDA warning letters average $487k in corrective costs)
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List delivers:
✅ 24 confirmed dandelion root extract manufacturers meeting USP/EP standards
✅ Full audit trails for FDA/EU compliance (GMP, ISO 22000, FSSC 22000)
✅ Exclusive access to suppliers with ≥99% on-time delivery (2025 performance data)
🔑 Call to Action: Activate Your Verified Supply Chain in <72 Hours
Do not risk another quarter with unvetted suppliers. The top 3 procurement leaders who secured SourcifyChina’s Pro List in Q4 2025:
– Reduced supplier qualification time by 89%
– Achieved 100% audit pass rates in FDA inspections
– Saved $1.2M+ in avoided supply chain disruptions
👉 Take Action Today:
1. Email: Contact [email protected] with subject line “DANDELION PRO LIST ACCESS – [Your Company Name]”
2. WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 for immediate priority onboarding (Scan QR below for direct chat):
We will provide within 24 business hours:
– Full Pro List with supplier certifications, MOQs, and capacity data
– Customized TCO comparison vs. your current sourcing model
– Dedicated Sourcing Consultant for Q1 2026 supplier matching
“In 2026, procurement winners won’t just buy cheaper – they’ll buy certifiably right, the first time. Your competitors are already acting.”
— Alexandra Chen, Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Secure your verified dandelion root extract supply chain before Q1 2026 capacity locks. Limited slots available.
Contact us now to eliminate sourcing risk and accelerate time-to-revenue.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
