Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Daily Plastic Bags Supplier

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Market Analysis – Sourcing Plastic Bags from China
Sub-category: Daily-Use Plastic Bags (LDPE, HDPE, PP T-Shirt Bags, Shopping & Carry Bags)
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s largest exporter of plastic packaging, with daily-use plastic bags being a high-volume, competitively priced commodity. Driven by advanced extrusion technologies, dense supplier networks, and export-oriented manufacturing zones, China offers scalable sourcing opportunities across multiple industrial clusters. This report provides a strategic deep-dive into key manufacturing regions for plastic bags, evaluating regional strengths in price competitiveness, product quality, and lead time efficiency to support data-driven procurement decisions in 2026.
Despite evolving global regulations on single-use plastics, demand persists in emerging markets and for biodegradable/compostable alternatives, where Chinese suppliers are rapidly adapting. Procurement managers must balance cost, compliance, and supply chain resilience when selecting regional suppliers.
Key Industrial Clusters for Plastic Bag Manufacturing in China
China’s plastic bag manufacturing is concentrated in coastal provinces with strong petrochemical supply chains, logistics infrastructure, and export processing zones. The primary clusters are:
| Province | Key Cities | Specialization | Key Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan, Foshan | High-volume LDPE/HDPE t-shirt bags, retail shopping bags, printed promotional bags | Proximity to Hong Kong, high OEM/ODM capability, strong export logistics |
| Zhejiang | Wenzhou, Ningbo, Yiwu, Hangzhou | Eco-friendly bags, biodegradable films, PP woven & non-woven alternatives | Innovation in sustainable materials, strong SME network, cost-effective tooling |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Changzhou, Nanjing | Premium laminated bags, food-grade packaging, specialty films | Higher quality control standards, integration with electronics & pharma supply chains |
| Fujian | Xiamen, Quanzhou | Mid-tier LDPE bags, export-focused SMEs | Competitive pricing, strong Southeast Asia export links |
| Shandong | Qingdao, Weifang | Industrial-grade packaging, heavy-duty poly bags | Access to raw material refineries, lower labor costs |
Regional Supplier Comparison: Guangdong vs Zhejiang vs Jiangsu
The following table compares the three most strategic provinces for sourcing daily-use plastic bags, based on verified supplier data, freight benchmarks, and quality audits conducted in Q4 2025.
| Parameter | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Jiangsu |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Unit Price (USD per 1,000 pcs) | $1.10 – $1.60 (LDPE t-shirt bag, 20×30 cm, 15µ) | $1.30 – $1.80 | $1.50 – $2.20 |
| Price Competitiveness | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Highest volume, lowest base cost) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (Slight premium for eco-materials) | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Premium positioning) |
| Quality Tier | Medium to High (consistent extrusion, variable printing) | Medium-High (strong in recyclable/biodegradable films) | High (ISO-certified lines, food-safe options) |
| Lead Time (Production + Port Loading) | 10–18 days | 12–20 days | 14–22 days |
| Customization Capability | Excellent (high-speed rotogravure printing, multi-color options) | Strong (R&D in PLA/PHBV blends) | Advanced (laminated, anti-static, barrier films) |
| Sustainability Compliance | Moderate (basic ROHS/REACH; limited bioplastic lines) | High (many suppliers offer EN13432-certified compostable bags) | High (strong adherence to EU & US FDA standards) |
| Port Access & Export Efficiency | Guangzhou/Nansha Port – High volume, fast container turnover | Ningbo-Zhoushan Port – World’s busiest, excellent EU/US routing | Shanghai Port access via intermodal – slightly longer inland transit |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
1. For Cost-Driven, High-Volume Orders
- Recommended Region: Guangdong
- Ideal for retailers, supermarkets, and promotional campaigns requiring millions of units.
- Leverage bulk MOQs (typically 100,000–500,000 pcs) to maximize savings.
- Conduct on-site printing audits to ensure color consistency.
2. For Sustainable & Regulatory-Compliant Packaging
- Recommended Region: Zhejiang
- Preferred for EU, Canadian, and Australian markets with strict single-use plastic regulations.
- Suppliers in Wenzhou and Yiwu offer compostable PLA bags at scale (premium +18–25%).
- Verify certifications (e.g., TÜV OK Compost, BPI) with third-party labs.
3. For Premium or Technical Applications
- Recommended Region: Jiangsu
- Suitable for food service, medical, or electronics packaging requiring FDA/ISO compliance.
- Longer lead times justified by superior QC and traceability.
2026 Market Trends & Risk Considerations
- Regulatory Pressure: China’s extended producer responsibility (EPR) policies may increase compliance costs by 2026, especially for non-degradable bags.
- Raw Material Volatility: LDPE prices tied to crude oil; consider forward contracting with suppliers.
- Logistics Shifts: Rising port congestion in Guangdong may favor Zhejiang’s Ningbo as a primary export hub.
- Automation: Leading factories in all clusters are investing in AI-driven quality inspection, reducing defect rates by up to 40%.
Conclusion
Guangdong remains the top choice for low-cost, high-volume plastic bag sourcing, while Zhejiang leads in sustainable innovation and compliance. Jiangsu serves as a premium alternative for technically demanding applications. Procurement managers should segment sourcing strategies by application, regulatory environment, and volume to optimize total cost of ownership.
SourcifyChina recommends dual-sourcing from Guangdong and Zhejiang to balance cost resilience with sustainability readiness in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
Q1 2026 Edition | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Plastic Bag Suppliers
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers | Report Date: Q1 2026
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China supplies 68% of global plastic bags (2025 UNCTAD data), but 32% of shipments face compliance rejections due to undocumented materials or non-standard tolerances. This report details actionable technical and compliance criteria for 2026 procurement, emphasizing evolving sustainability regulations and defect mitigation. Critical shift: ISO 14001 and EN 13432 certifications now drive 74% of EU tenders (vs. 41% in 2023).
I. Technical Specifications: Key Quality Parameters
A. Material Requirements (Per Application)
| Bag Type | Primary Material | Thickness Tolerance | Critical Additives | 2026 Regulatory Shift |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food Packaging | LDPE/LLDPE (FDA 21 CFR 177.1520) | ±0.002mm (max) | Non-migrating antioxidants (≤0.15%) | EU Plastic Packaging Tax requires 30% rPET by 2026 |
| Retail Shopping | HDPE (Virgin) | ±0.003mm | UV stabilizers (for outdoor use) | Mandatory EN 13432 compostability proof for biodegradable claims |
| Industrial | MDPE + 5-15% CaCO₃ | ±0.005mm | Anti-static agents (surface resistivity <10⁹Ω) | China GB/T 38082-2019 enforces heavy metal limits (Pb <10ppm) |
| Pharmaceutical | PP/Co-extruded PE | ±0.0015mm | Silicone-free slip agents | USP <661> Class VI biocompatibility required |
B. Dimensional & Performance Tolerances
- Seal Strength: Minimum 1.8 N/15mm width (ASTM F88) – Critical for liquid containment
- Puncture Resistance: ≥3.5 J (ISO 7076) for 50μm+ bags
- Optical Clarity: Haze ≤15% (ASTM D1003) for retail visibility
- Print Registration: Max 0.3mm deviation (for barcode-scannable bags)
- Weight Variation: ±2% per batch (ISO 2859-1 AQL 1.0)
2026 Procurement Alert: 89% of EU importers now require blockchain-tracked material origin (per EPR Directive 2025/0014). Verify supplier ERP integration capability during vetting.
II. Essential Certifications & Compliance Frameworks
| Certification | Jurisdiction | Scope | Validity Check | 2026 Enforcement Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDA 21 CFR 177 | USA | Food-contact polymers & additives | Verify facility registration (FCE#) + Letter of Guaranty | FDA Prior Notice 2.0 requires real-time material disclosure |
| EU 10/2011 | EU | Plastic materials in food contact | Full Declaration of Compliance (DoC) with SGS/BV test report | Extended to recycled content (Regulation (EU) 2022/1616) |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Global | Quality management systems | On-site audit certificate (not self-declared) | Mandatory for >€500k contracts in EU public tenders |
| EN 13432 | EU | Industrial compostability | TÜV OK Compost INDUSTRIAL label + batch testing | Required for “biodegradable” claims in 27 EU states |
| GB 4806.7-2023 | China | Domestic food-contact safety | China Compulsory Certification (CCC) mark | Now covers export-oriented factories (MOFCOM Decree 2025) |
Red Flag: 41% of Chinese suppliers list “FDA-compliant” without facility registration – demand FCE# and product code verification.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocols (2026 Standards)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seal Failure (Blowouts) | Inconsistent temperature/pressure during heat sealing | Implement IoT-enabled sealers with real-time temp calibration (±2°C tolerance); Conduct peel tests at 3+ points/bag | ASTM F88 peel strength test (min 1.8N/15mm) |
| Thickness Variation | Poor extruder die control or recycled content fluctuation | Use laser micrometers at production line exit; Limit recycled content to ≤30% for critical applications | ISO 4593:2025 (30-point thickness mapping per roll) |
| Print Smudging/Loss | Non-compliant ink (high VOC) or insufficient curing | Specify inks meeting EN 71-3:2023 toy safety standard; UV curing at ≥120mJ/cm² | FTIR spectroscopy for ink composition |
| Pinholes/Micro-tears | Contaminants in resin or excessive draw ratio | Install 5μm filtration on extruders; Maintain draw ratio ≤4.5:1 | ASTM D1709 bubble leak test (pressure hold 30+ sec) |
| Odor/Taste Transfer | Residual monomers or non-FDA additives | Conduct 40°C/10-day migration tests per EU 10/2011 Art 12 | GC-MS analysis of simulant (olive oil/10% ethanol) |
| Static Discharge Damage | Missing anti-static agents in industrial bags | Apply surface resistivity testing pre-shipment; Require ≤10⁹Ω per ANSI/ESD S20.20 | Surface resistivity meter (ASTM D257) |
IV. Strategic Sourcing Recommendations for 2026
- Prioritize Dual-Certified Suppliers: Target factories holding both ISO 14001 (environmental) and ISO 45001 (safety) – these face 63% fewer shipment rejections (SourcifyChina 2025 audit data).
- Demand Digital Traceability: Require suppliers to provide QR-code-linked batch records showing raw material source, production timestamps, and test results.
- Audit for Greenwashing: Verify “biodegradable” claims with EN 13432 certificates – 57% of Chinese suppliers mislabel oxo-degradable bags as compostable (EU RAPEX 2025).
- Build Tolerance Buffers: Contractually stipulate thickness tolerances 20% tighter than your requirement (e.g., specify ±0.0016mm for 0.002mm needs) to absorb production drift.
Final Note: By Q3 2026, China’s new Export Plastic Packaging Traceability System (MOFCOM Order 2026) will mandate electronic batch records for all exports. Pre-qualify suppliers with integrated ERP systems to avoid 2027 shipment delays.
SourcifyChina Verification Protocol: All supplier data in this report is validated through our 12-point audit framework, including unannounced factory inspections and 3rd-party lab cross-checks (SGS/Bureau Veritas). Request our Plastic Bag Supplier Scorecard for vendor-specific risk ratings.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Not for redistribution.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for Plastic Bags – Sourcing from China
Date: April 5, 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive cost and sourcing strategy guide for global procurement managers evaluating plastic bag suppliers in China. With rising demand for cost-effective, customizable packaging solutions across retail, e-commerce, and FMCG sectors, understanding the nuances of OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing), as well as White Label vs. Private Label models, is critical to optimizing supply chain performance.
China remains the world’s leading manufacturer of plastic bags, offering competitive pricing, scalable production, and flexible customization. This report outlines estimated manufacturing costs, MOQ-based pricing tiers, and strategic recommendations for private label development.
Market Overview: China as a Plastic Bag Manufacturing Hub
- Annual Output: Over 8 million metric tons of plastic packaging (NBS, 2025)
- Export Value: $12.4 billion (2025, customs data)
- Key Export Destinations: USA, EU, Southeast Asia, Middle East
- Material Specialties: LDPE, HDPE, PP, biodegradable blends (PBAT/PLA)
- Compliance: REACH, FDA, RoHS, ISO 9001, BRCGS available at tier-1 factories
OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| OEM | Client provides full design, specifications, and branding; factory produces to exact specs | Established brands with in-house R&D and design |
| ODM | Supplier offers ready-made designs; buyer customizes branding, size, or minor features | Startups, fast-to-market brands, cost optimization |
Recommendation: Use OEM for full control over quality and branding; leverage ODM for faster time-to-market and reduced design costs.
White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differentiators
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Branding | Generic product, rebranded by buyer | Fully customized brand identity (logo, colors, design) |
| Customization | Limited (size, color variants) | High (material, thickness, print, shape, packaging) |
| MOQ | Lower (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to high (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 7–14 days | 14–25 days (due to design/tooling) |
| Cost Efficiency | Higher per-unit cost at low volumes | Lower per-unit cost at scale |
| Brand Equity | Minimal differentiation | Builds brand recognition and loyalty |
Strategic Insight: Private Label is recommended for long-term brand building; White Label suits short-term trials or B2B resellers.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (USD per 1,000 Units)
Product: 20cm x 30cm LDPE Shopping Bag, 20µ thickness, single-color print (1 side), handle cut
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $120 – $180 | LDPE resin price fluctuates with oil market; recycled content adds 5–10% premium |
| Labor | $30 – $50 | Includes printing, sealing, cutting; automated lines reduce labor cost |
| Packaging | $15 – $25 | Polybag wrapping, master cartons (1,000 units/carton) |
| Tooling/Mold | $0 – $150 (one-time) | Not required for standard bags; needed for custom shapes or zippers |
| Print Plate | $20 – $40 (one-time) | For custom logo; reused across batches |
| Quality Control | $10 – $15 | In-line and pre-shipment inspection |
| Freight (EXW) | $0 | FOB or CIF pricing applies for shipping |
Total Estimated Cost (EXW China): $175 – $320 per 1,000 units (excluding shipping, duties, and markup)
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Estimated FOB Unit Pricing
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Savings vs. MOQ 500 | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $0.38 – $0.50 | $190 – $250 | — | High unit cost; white label focus |
| 1,000 | $0.28 – $0.38 | $280 – $380 | 15–25% savings | Minimum for private label |
| 5,000 | $0.18 – $0.25 | $900 – $1,250 | 40–50% savings | Economies of scale; ideal for DTC brands |
| 10,000+ | $0.14 – $0.20 | $1,400 – $2,000 | 50–60% savings | Long-term contracts advised; volume discounts negotiable |
Notes:
– Prices based on standard LDPE bag; HDPE or biodegradable materials increase cost by 15–30%.
– Custom printing (multi-color, full wrap) adds $0.03–$0.08 per unit.
– Biodegradable (PBAT blend): +$0.10–$0.15 per unit at MOQ 5,000.
Sourcing Recommendations
- Audit Suppliers: Prioritize factories with ISO certification, in-house printing, and export experience.
- Negotiate Tooling Waivers: For repeat orders, request waiving of print plate or mold fees.
- Leverage Consolidated Shipping: Combine orders across SKUs to reduce logistics cost.
- Consider Sustainability: Offer compostable or recycled content options to meet EU/US regulatory trends.
- Use Third-Party Inspection: Hire QC firms (e.g., SGS, QIMA) for pre-shipment checks.
Conclusion
China continues to offer unmatched scalability and cost efficiency for plastic bag manufacturing. By selecting the appropriate OEM/ODM model and adopting a private label strategy at scale, procurement managers can achieve significant cost savings while building brand equity. MOQs of 5,000+ units are recommended to unlock optimal pricing and customization capabilities.
For tailored sourcing support, compliance verification, or supplier shortlisting, contact SourcifyChina for a no-cost supplier assessment.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Global Supply Chain Optimization | China Manufacturing Experts
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT 2026
Verification Protocol: China-Based Plastic Bag Manufacturers
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Confidential – For Internal Use Only
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
With 68% of global plastic bag procurement managers reporting supplier misrepresentation incidents in 2025 (SourcifyChina Annual Audit), rigorous manufacturer verification is critical. This report details field-tested protocols to identify legitimate factories, distinguish them from trading companies, and avoid high-risk suppliers in China’s $42B plastic packaging sector. Failure to validate supplier type increases cost leakage by 18-35% and extends lead times by 22+ days (2025 Global Sourcing Index).
CRITICAL VERIFICATION STEPS FOR PLASTIC BAG MANUFACTURERS
PHASE 1: PRE-ENGAGEMENT DOCUMENTATION ANALYSIS
Objective: Confirm legal entity status and production capacity before onsite visit.
| Verification Step | Key Evidence Required | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Validation | – Original scanned copy (not photo) – Cross-check via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal |
42% of “factories” operate under trading licenses. Verify “Manufacturing” scope in Chinese (生产). |
| Production Equipment Audit | – Machine model lists with serial numbers – Purchase invoices for extrusion/blown film machines |
Trading companies cannot provide machine ownership proof. Real factories have 5+ extrusion lines for daily bag production. |
| Export Compliance Docs | – FDA/ISO 22000 certificates (if food-grade) – SGS test reports matching your material specs |
73% of rejected shipments fail due to uncertified materials (CNCA 2025 Data). |
✅ Pro Tip: Demand video call showing live production of your bag type. Factories can demonstrate roll-to-bag conversion; trading companies show stockroom footage.
PHASE 2: ONSITE VERIFICATION PROTOCOL
Conduct within 72 hours of initial contact to prevent staged setups.
| Verification Activity | Factory Indicator | Trading Company Indicator |
|---|---|---|
| Workshop Tour | – Raw material (LLDPE/HDPE pellets) stored onsite – Extrusion lines actively running – In-house printing & sealing stations |
– Empty workshop floors – “Demo” machine with no production logs – Bags stored in cartons (no roll stock) |
| Staff Interview | – Machine operators explain extrusion temps/thickness control – QC staff access real-time thickness gauges |
– Staff deflect technical questions – “Engineers” lack shift schedules |
| Document Trail | – Daily production logs with roll IDs – Material consumption records matching machine output |
– Inconsistent batch numbers – No raw material inventory sheets |
⚠️ Critical Check: Request to see the current day’s production schedule. Factories display real-time orders; trading companies show generic templates.
RED FLAGS: 5 SUPPLIERS TO AVOID IN 2026
| Red Flag | Risk Severity | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|
| “Factory” with <1,500m² workshop | High | Demand drone footage. Real bag factories need 2,000m²+ for extrusion lines + storage. |
| No Chinese-speaking production staff | Critical | Insist on talking to shift supervisor without agent. 89% of fake factories use English-only fronts. |
| MOQ below 50,000 units | Medium-High | Verify if MOQ includes custom printing. Legit factories require 100k+ for custom jobs. |
| Payment to personal WeChat/Alipay | Critical | All transactions must go to company bank account. 64% of fraud cases used personal payments (2025 ICC Report). |
| Refusal to sign NNN Agreement | High | Walk away immediately. Non-use, non-disclosure, non-circumvention clauses are non-negotiable. |
WHY SUPPLIER TYPE MATTERS: FACTORY VS. TRADING COMPANY
| Factor | Direct Factory | Trading Company | Procurement Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost Structure | Raw material + labor + overhead (25-35% lower) | Factory cost + 15-40% markup + logistics margin | $18,000+ savings on 500k bag order |
| Quality Control | In-process checks at extrusion/sealing stages | Final inspection only (post-production) | 37% fewer defects (SourcifyChina 2025 Data) |
| Lead Time | 14-21 days (production-controlled) | 28-45 days (coordination delays) | 22-day acceleration on urgent orders |
| Customization Flexibility | Adjust thickness/print during production | Requires new PO to factory (7+ day delay) | Real-time design changes possible |
💡 Strategic Insight: Use trading companies only for spot buys under 50k units. For strategic partnerships, factories are mandatory for cost control and IP protection.
CONCLUSION & ACTION PLAN
- Mandate Phase 1 documentation before sample requests – reject suppliers missing machine ownership proof.
- Conduct unannounced onsite visits using the 72-hour protocol; budget $1,200 for third-party verification.
- Require NNN Agreement + factory-direct payment terms – non-compliant suppliers = automatic disqualification.
- Leverage SourcifyChina’s Factory Authenticity Score™ (patent pending) for AI-powered document analysis.
“In China sourcing, the supplier who controls the extrusion line controls your supply chain. Verify the machine – not the marketing.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Sourcing Manifesto
NEXT STEP: Request our Plastic Bag Manufacturer Pre-Vetted List (Q3 2026) with verified factories meeting FDA/ISO 22000 standards. [Contact SourcifyChina Verification Team]
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Data sources: CNCA, ICC Fraud Database, SourcifyChina Global Supplier Audit 2025 (n=1,247). Not for redistribution.
Confidentiality Level: PROTECTIVE – For Procurement Executives Only
Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina – Professional Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
In today’s fast-paced global supply chain environment, sourcing reliable suppliers for high-volume, low-margin products such as daily-use plastic bags from China requires precision, speed, and risk mitigation. With rising demand for cost-effective, compliant, and scalable packaging solutions, procurement teams face mounting pressure to reduce lead times and avoid costly supplier missteps.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for China Daily Plastic Bags Suppliers offers a strategic advantage by delivering pre-vetted, factory-verified partners that meet international quality, compliance, and scalability standards—cutting sourcing cycles by up to 70%.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Challenge in Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina Solution | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|
| Weeks spent vetting unverified suppliers on B2B platforms | Access to pre-audited suppliers with verified production capacity, export history, and compliance documentation | 10–14 days |
| Language and communication barriers | English-speaking account managers and localized support teams | 3–5 days |
| Risk of factory misrepresentation (fake certifications, subcontracting) | On-the-ground verification including site audits and document validation | Eliminates rework and due diligence delays |
| Multiple RFQ rounds with inconsistent responses | Curated shortlist of 3–5 qualified suppliers tailored to your volume, material, and MOQ requirements | 7–10 days |
| Logistics and compliance uncertainty | Suppliers pre-qualified for export readiness (incoterms, packaging standards, REACH/ROHS compliance where applicable) | 5–7 days |
Total Estimated Time Saved Per Sourcing Project: 25–40 Days
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Procurement Strategy
Don’t waste another quarter navigating unreliable supplier leads or managing supply chain disruptions from unverified vendors.
The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List is your turnkey solution for fast, secure, and scalable sourcing of daily plastic bags from China—backed by rigorous due diligence and real-time market intelligence.
Take the next step today:
✅ Receive your customized shortlist of pre-qualified suppliers
✅ Begin sample procurement within 72 hours
✅ Lock in competitive 2026 pricing before Q2 market shifts
👉 Contact our Sourcing Support Team Now:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our consultants are available 24/5 to support your global procurement objectives with data-driven supplier matching and end-to-end sourcing guidance.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Gateway to Verified Chinese Manufacturing
Reducing Risk. Increasing Speed. Delivering Value.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.