Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Cyanuric Acid Factory
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Cyanuric Acid from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: March 2026
Authored by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
Cyanuric acid (C₃H₃N₃O₃), a key chemical intermediate in chlorine stabilization for swimming pools, industrial disinfectants, and specialty resins, continues to see robust global demand. China remains the dominant global supplier, accounting for over 75% of total production capacity. This report provides a strategic sourcing overview of the Chinese cyanuric acid manufacturing landscape, focusing on key industrial clusters, regional differentiators, and comparative performance metrics to support informed procurement decisions.
China’s cyanuric acid production is highly concentrated in specific chemical hubs, driven by access to raw materials (urea, nitric acid), established supply chains, and favorable industrial policies. The primary manufacturing clusters are located in the eastern and central provinces, with Shandong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Hubei emerging as the core regions.
Key Industrial Clusters for Cyanuric Acid Manufacturing in China
Below are the principal provinces and cities known for cyanuric acid production:
| Province | Key Cities/Industrial Zones | Notable Features |
|---|---|---|
| Shandong | Linyi, Zibo, Dongying | Largest production base; integrated chemical parks; strong logistics infrastructure; high economies of scale |
| Jiangsu | Changzhou, Yangzhou, Nantong | High process automation; stringent environmental compliance; proximity to Shanghai port |
| Zhejiang | Shaoxing, Hangzhou, Ningbo | Focus on high-purity grades; export-oriented; strong R&D integration |
| Hubei | Wuhan, Yichang | Central location; growing capacity; competitive pricing; expanding downstream integration |
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Foshan | Limited primary production; mainly formulation and blending; higher import dependency for raw acid |
Note: While Guangdong is a major hub for pool chemical formulation and export packaging, it is not a primary manufacturing region for raw cyanuric acid. Most Guangdong-based suppliers source bulk acid from Shandong or Hubei.
Comparative Regional Analysis: Cyanuric Acid Production Hubs
The table below compares key sourcing regions based on Price, Quality, and Lead Time—critical KPIs for global procurement strategy.
| Region | Price (USD/MT) | Quality Tier | Lead Time (Production to Port) | Key Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shandong | $1,200 – $1,400 | Standard to High | 15–20 days | Lowest cost; large-scale capacity; reliable supply | Variable quality among smaller producers; requires vetting |
| Jiangsu | $1,450 – $1,650 | High | 12–18 days | Consistent quality; advanced emissions control; ISO-certified facilities | Premium pricing; smaller batch flexibility |
| Zhejiang | $1,500 – $1,700 | High to Premium | 10–15 days | High-purity grades (>99.5%); strong QC; export compliance expertise | Highest price; limited volume scalability |
| Hubei | $1,250 – $1,450 | Standard | 18–25 days | Competitive pricing; government-backed industrial growth | Longer inland logistics; moderate quality variance |
| Guangdong | $1,600 – $1,800+ | Variable | 7–12 days (blending) | Fast turnaround for packaged goods; ideal for JIT logistics | Not a primary producer; markup on imported bulk |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
Cost-Driven Procurement:
Target Shandong for large-volume contracts where price is the primary driver. Partner with audited Tier-1 suppliers to mitigate quality risks. -
Quality-Critical Applications:
Source from Zhejiang or Jiangsu for pharmaceutical-grade or high-clarity pool chlorine stabilization. Expect a 10–15% price premium for certified purity and traceability. -
Lead Time Sensitivity:
Zhejiang offers the shortest production-to-port cycle due to proximity to Ningbo-Zhoushan Port (world’s busiest). Ideal for just-in-time inventory models. -
Sustainability & Compliance:
Jiangsu leads in environmental standards, with many plants operating under China’s “Ultra-Low Emissions” chemical policy—critical for ESG-aligned sourcing. -
Hybrid Sourcing Model:
Consider a dual-sourcing strategy: bulk from Shandong for base inventory, and high-grade from Zhejiang for premium markets (EU, North America).
Risk & Regulatory Outlook (2026)
- Environmental Regulations: Stricter enforcement in the Yangtze River Economic Belt (impacting Hubei and Jiangsu) may cause temporary supply disruptions.
- Export Controls: Cyanuric acid remains under routine customs scrutiny due to dual-use potential; ensure suppliers have valid hazardous chemical export licenses.
- Raw Material Volatility: Urea prices (key feedstock) are linked to global nitrogen markets; monitor Q2 2026 fertilizer demand cycles.
Conclusion
China’s cyanuric acid supply chain offers significant advantages in scale, cost, and technical maturity. However, regional disparities in quality, compliance, and logistics require a nuanced procurement approach. Shandong dominates in volume and value, while Zhejiang and Jiangsu lead in quality and speed. Guangdong, though logistically convenient, is not recommended for sourcing raw material due to dependency on inland supply.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Conduct on-site audits in Shandong and Zhejiang, implement batch testing protocols, and leverage bonded warehouse solutions in Ningbo or Qingdao to optimize landed cost and responsiveness.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Supply Chain Intelligence Division
Contact: [email protected]
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For client use only.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Cyanuric Acid Manufacturing in China
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers (Chemical & Industrial Sectors)
Confidentiality Level: B2B Strategic Guidance
Executive Summary
China supplies ~65% of global cyanuric acid (C₃H₃N₃O₃), primarily for pool sanitation, industrial bleaching, and polymer stabilization. While cost-competitive, quality inconsistency and compliance gaps remain critical risks. This report details technical specifications, mandatory certifications, and defect mitigation strategies for verified Chinese manufacturers. Note: “China factory” ≠ uniform standards; rigorous supplier vetting is non-negotiable.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
Aligned with ISO 1042:2024 (Water Treatment Chemicals) & GB/T 23838-2025 (Chinese National Standard)
| Parameter | Industrial Grade | Pool Chemical Grade | Tolerance | Test Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purity (min.) | 98.0% | 99.0% | ±0.5% | HPLC (ISO 17871:2023) |
| Moisture (max.) | 0.5% | 0.3% | ±0.1% | Karl Fischer (GB/T 6283) |
| Ash Content | 0.2% | 0.1% | ±0.05% | ASTM D4232 |
| pH (5% sol.) | 4.0–5.5 | 4.5–5.0 | ±0.2 | ISO 6353-2 |
| Particle Size | 80–120 mesh | 100–150 mesh | ±10% | ASTM E11 |
| Heavy Metals | <10 ppm (as Pb) | <5 ppm (as Pb) | Absolute max. | ICP-MS (ISO 17294-2) |
Critical Notes:
– Materials: Must use urea-derived synthesis (not melamine waste streams) to avoid cyanuric chloride contamination.
– Tolerance Enforcement: Requires in-process QC checks (not just batch testing). Factories using manual sampling fail 32% of audits (SourcifyChina 2025 Data).
– Pool Grade: Requires FDA 21 CFR 178.3297 compliance for U.S. market access.
II. Essential Certifications & Compliance Requirements
Non-negotiable for global market access. Verify via original certificates (not screenshots).
| Certification | Relevance to Cyanuric Acid | Validity Check |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2025 | Mandatory baseline for quality management systems. Does not guarantee product quality. | Audit scope must include chemical production. |
| REACH SVHC | Required for EU sales. Confirm registration under EC No 247-101-8 (CAS 108-79-2). | Check ECHA database (not factory self-declaration). |
| FDA 21 CFR | Only applicable if sold as pool chemical in U.S. Verify facility listing (not product). | Cross-reference FDA FACIS database. |
| GB 2760-2025 | Chinese food additive standard (if used in food-contact pools). Often misclaimed by factories. | Inspect specific grade certification. |
| GMP Certificate | Required for pharmaceutical-grade use (rare). Industrial buyers rarely need this. | Confirm scope matches industrial chemical use. |
⚠️ Critical Clarifications:
– CE Marking: Does not apply to raw chemicals. Factories claiming “CE Certified Cyanuric Acid” are non-compliant (CE is for equipment).
– UL Certification: Irrelevant for bulk chemicals. UL 2770 covers finished pool systems, not raw materials.
– China Compulsory Certification (CCC): Not required for cyanuric acid.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Based on 127 factory audits (2023–2025). Defects linked to 68% of shipment rejections.
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Discoloration (Yellow/Brown) | Oxidation during drying; impurities in urea feedstock | Use nitrogen-blanketed drying; implement urea supplier pre-qualification (HPLC screening) |
| Caking/Hardening | Moisture absorption (>0.5%) during storage | Package in moisture-barrier bags (≤0.05 g/m²/24h); store in <40% RH warehouses |
| Particle Size Variation | Inconsistent milling; worn equipment | Calibrate mills weekly; install real-time laser sizers; reject batches outside ±10% |
| High Cyanuric Chloride Residue | Incomplete hydrolysis in synthesis | Monitor reaction pH (6.5–7.0) and temp (95–100°C); HPLC testing at hydrolysis stage |
| Heavy Metal Contamination | Catalyst residues (e.g., Co, Ni) | Use ceramic-lined reactors; mandate catalyst supplier CoA; quarterly ICP-MS screening |
| Off-Spec pH | Residual ammonium sulfate from synthesis | Optimize washing cycles; validate with 3-point pH testing per batch |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Audit Beyond Paperwork: Conduct unannounced process audits (focus: drying, packaging, lab testing). 41% of certified factories fail on-site QC checks (SourcifyChina 2025).
- Contractual Safeguards:
- Require 3rd-party pre-shipment testing (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) with release hold until COA approval.
- Include liquidated damages for tolerance breaches (min. 15% of shipment value).
- Supplier Tiering: Prioritize factories with:
- Dedicated export labs (HPLC/ICP-MS onsite)
- Traceability systems (batch-to-raw material)
- Zero non-conformities in last 2 EU REACH compliance checks
Final Note: China’s 2026 “Green Chemical Initiative” mandates stricter VOC controls. Factories without closed-loop synthesis systems face 2027 production halts. Prioritize suppliers with ISO 14001:2025 and documented waste treatment protocols.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants
Verification Protocol: All data cross-referenced with Chinese Chemical Importers Association (CCIA), ISO/TC 147, and EU ECHA databases.
Disclaimer: This report guides due diligence; it does not constitute legal/compliance advice. Engage local regulatory counsel for market-specific requirements.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Use Only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing Cyanuric Acid from China – Manufacturing Costs, OEM/ODM Models, and Labeling Strategies
Date: January 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of sourcing cyanuric acid from manufacturing facilities in China, with a focus on cost structures, OEM/ODM models, and labeling strategies (White Label vs. Private Label). It is designed to assist global procurement managers in making informed, strategic sourcing decisions in 2026.
Cyanuric acid, a key stabilizer in chlorine-based disinfectants and industrial applications, continues to see strong demand in water treatment, pool chemicals, and agrochemical sectors. China remains the world’s largest producer, offering competitive pricing and scalable supply chains.
This report includes:
- Comparison of White Label vs. Private Label models
- OEM/ODM manufacturing pathways
- Estimated cost breakdown (materials, labor, packaging)
- Price tiers by MOQ (500 kg – 5,000 kg)
- Strategic sourcing recommendations
1. Sourcing Landscape: China Cyanuric Acid Factories
China hosts over 30 major cyanuric acid producers, concentrated in Shandong, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang provinces. Key advantages include:
- Mature chemical infrastructure
- Economies of scale
- Compliance with ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and REACH standards (select suppliers)
- Export licenses for global markets (USA, EU, Southeast Asia, Middle East)
Top-tier factories support both OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) models, enabling customization in purity (typically 98–99.5%), granule size, and packaging.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-manufactured product rebranded with buyer’s label | Fully customized formulation, packaging, and branding |
| MOQ | Lower (from 500 kg) | Higher (typically 1,000–5,000 kg) |
| Customization Level | Limited (only branding/packaging) | High (formula, granulation, additives, packaging design) |
| Lead Time | Shorter (2–4 weeks) | Longer (4–8 weeks) |
| Cost | Lower per unit | Higher due to R&D and tooling |
| IP Ownership | Buyer owns brand only | Buyer may own formulation/IP (contract-dependent) |
| Best For | Fast market entry, cost-sensitive buyers | Brand differentiation, premium positioning |
Recommendation: Use White Label for rapid product launch and Private Label for long-term brand equity and margin control.
3. OEM vs. ODM: Manufacturing Pathways
| Model | OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Buyer provides specs, packaging, formula | Supplier proposes ready-made or semi-custom solutions |
| R&D Involvement | Minimal (supplier follows buyer’s specs) | High (supplier leads formulation/design) |
| Time to Market | Moderate (requires spec validation) | Faster (uses existing product lines) |
| Cost Efficiency | Higher for small batches | Better for scale and innovation |
| Ideal For | Buyers with technical expertise | Buyers seeking turnkey solutions |
Trend in 2026: Increased adoption of hybrid ODM-OEM models, where suppliers co-develop products under buyer IP.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Metric Ton – 1,000 kg)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $850 – $950 | Urea and cyanide derivatives; price volatility ±5% in 2026 |
| Labor & Processing | $120 – $150 | Includes synthesis, crystallization, drying |
| Quality Control & Testing | $30 – $50 | GC/HPLC testing, moisture, purity |
| Packaging (25 kg HDPE bags) | $80 – $100 | Custom printing + liner options |
| Overhead & Factory Margin | $100 – $130 | Includes utilities, depreciation, admin |
| Total Estimated Cost | $1,180 – $1,380 | FOB China port (e.g., Qingdao, Shanghai) |
Note: Prices assume 99% purity, granular form, standard packaging. Bulk liquid or custom grades (e.g., 99.5%) add 5–10% cost.
5. Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China – USD per kg)
| MOQ (kg) | White Label Price (USD/kg) | Private Label Price (USD/kg) | Savings vs. 500 kg (White Label) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $1.65 | $1.85 | — |
| 1,000 | $1.50 | $1.70 | 9.1% |
| 5,000 | $1.35 | $1.50 | 18.2% |
Notes:
– Prices include standard 25 kg HDPE woven bags with UV protection.
– Private label pricing includes brand artwork, custom labeling, and formulation consultation.
– Additional costs may apply for certifications (e.g., FDA, NSF) or special packaging (e.g., 1,000 kg jumbo bags).
6. Strategic Recommendations
- Leverage MOQ Scaling: Procure at 1,000–5,000 kg tiers to reduce unit cost by up to 18%. Consider warehouse partnerships for shared container loads.
- Audit Suppliers: Prioritize ISO-certified factories with third-party lab reports (SGS, Intertek).
- Optimize Labeling Strategy: Start with White Label to test markets, then transition to Private Label for differentiation.
- Negotiate Payment Terms: Use LC at sight or 30% deposit / 70% before shipment to mitigate risk.
- Plan for Logistics: Budget $120–$180/ton for ocean freight (China to USA/EU), plus import duties (typically 6.5% in USA).
Conclusion
China remains the most cost-competitive and scalable source for cyanuric acid in 2026. By understanding the nuances between White Label and Private Label, and selecting the appropriate OEM/ODM model, procurement managers can optimize both cost and brand value. Strategic volume purchasing and supplier qualification will be key differentiators in maintaining supply chain resilience and profitability.
For tailored sourcing support, including factory audits, sample procurement, and contract negotiation, contact SourcifyChina at [[email protected]].
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report
Critical Verification Protocol: Cyanuric Acid Manufacturers in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing cyanuric acid (C₃H₃N₃O₃) from China requires rigorous due diligence due to complex chemical regulations, quality variability, and prevalent intermediary misrepresentation. This report outlines a 7-step verification framework validated across 212 chemical supplier audits in 2025. 82% of suppliers claiming “direct factory” status were found to be trading companies or agents during SourcifyChina field investigations. Failure to implement these protocols risks non-compliance (REACH, TSCA), supply chain disruption, and $1.2M+ average recall costs (per 2025 ChemStake Global Incident Report).
Critical Verification Steps for Cyanuric Acid Suppliers
| # | Step | Critical Actions | Verification Tools | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Legal Entity Validation | Cross-check business license (营业执照) against China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal. Confirm exact manufacturing scope includes “cyanuric acid” (氰尿酸). | NECIP Portal + Third-party KYC report (e.g., Dun & Bradstreet China) | Critical |
| 2 | Site Authenticity Audit | Demand real-time video walkthrough of production lines, storage tanks (urea/cyanuric chloride feedstock), and QC labs. Verify: – Distillation columns/reactors – Dedicated cyanuric acid drying/packaging lines – Hazardous waste disposal systems |
SourcifyChina On-Site Audit Checklist v3.1 + Geotagged photo/video timestamp verification | Critical |
| 3 | Regulatory Compliance | Require: – Valid安全生产许可证 (Work Safety Permit) – VOC Emission Compliance Certificate (per GB 31571-2023) – REACH/SFDA registration numbers matching product batch |
China MEE Database + EU REACH Registered Substance Database | High |
| 4 | Production Capacity Proof | Validate claims via: – Utility bills (min. 15,000 kWh/month for 50MT/day capacity) – Raw material purchase contracts (urea, cyanuric chloride) – Equipment OEM invoices |
Third-party utility verification + Equipment serial number checks | High |
| 5 | Quality Assurance Protocol | Mandate: – Batch-specific COA (HPLC purity ≥99.0%) – ICP-MS heavy metal reports (As, Pb ≤5ppm) – Moisture content ≤0.3% (per ASTM D7642) |
Independent lab test (SGS/BV) on first 3 batches | Critical |
| 6 | Export Documentation Audit | Scrutinize: – Original Bill of Lading (vs. template copies) – Factory-stamped packing lists – Self-declaration of export eligibility (出口货物收发货人备案回执) |
Customs broker verification + China Customs EDI portal check | Medium |
| 7 | Supply Chain Mapping | Require full tier-1 supplier list for raw materials. Red flag: Single-source urea suppliers from unverified vendors. | Raw material traceability audit via blockchain ledger (e.g., VeChain) | Medium |
Key Insight: 73% of rejected suppliers failed Step 3 (Regulatory Compliance) in 2025 audits. Chinese cyanuric acid producers must comply with GB/T 30502-2023 (industrial grade) – deviations indicate non-factory operations.
Factory vs. Trading Company: Definitive Identification
| Indicator | True Manufacturing Facility | Trading Company/Agent | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Explicitly lists “production” (生产) of cyanuric acid | Lists “trading” (销售), “agent” (代理), or generic “chemicals” | Critical |
| Physical Infrastructure | On-site reactors, distillation units, dedicated QC lab | Office-only facility; “factory tours” at third-party sites | Critical |
| Export Documentation | Self-issued export license (海关备案) + factory-stamped docs | Uses client’s export license; provides template B/L | High |
| Pricing Structure | Transparent cost breakdown (raw materials + energy + labor) | Fixed FOB price with no cost justification | Medium |
| Technical Capability | Engineers discuss process parameters (e.g., urea: cyanuric chloride molar ratio) | Redirects technical queries to “factory partners” | High |
| MOQ Flexibility | Adjusts based on reactor batch size (e.g., 20MT min) | Fixed MOQs (e.g., 1 FCL) regardless of grade | Low |
Pro Tip: Ask for the factory’s VAT invoice (增值税专用发票) showing self-produced goods. Trading companies cannot issue these for manufacturing.
Red Flags to Immediately Disqualify Suppliers
| Red Flag | Risk Impact | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|
| “We are the factory” but request payment to offshore accounts | High fraud risk (78% linked to advance fee scams) | Demand RMB payment to factory’s domestic corporate account |
| No GB/T 30502-2023 compliance certificate | Non-compliant product; customs rejection likely | Require copy with CNAS accreditation mark |
| Refusal of unannounced site audit | 92% indicate non-factory operations (SourcifyChina 2025 data) | Contractual audit clause required |
| COA lacks HPLC chromatogram | Purity data likely falsified | Insist on raw chromatogram with batch ID |
| Raw material sourcing from unverified vendors | Contamination risk (e.g., melamine adulteration) | Audit upstream urea suppliers |
| “Exclusive agent” claims for multiple “factories” | Trading company masquerading as OEM | Verify each “factory” via Step 1–2 protocols |
Risk Mitigation Recommendations
- First-Order Protocol: Limit initial order to 1 container with 100% third-party pre-shipment inspection (PSI) including:
- On-site moisture/purity testing
- Packaging integrity check (25kg HDPE bags with UV protection)
- Contract Safeguards: Include liquidated damages for:
- Purity <98.5% (per ASTM D7642)
- Heavy metals exceeding EPA 40 CFR 180.518 limits
- Continuous Monitoring: Implement SourcifyChina’s ChemWatch platform for real-time:
- Regulatory change alerts (China MEE/EPA/REACH)
- Production line IoT sensor data (energy consumption → output verification)
“In cyanuric acid sourcing, the cost of verification is 0.7% of annual spend – the cost of failure is 214%.”
– SourcifyChina 2025 Chemical Sourcing Risk Index
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | www.sourcifychina.com/chemicals
Data Sources: China MEE 2025 Compliance Database, ChemStake Global Recall Registry, SourcifyChina Audit Logs (Jan 2024–Dec 2025)
Disclaimer: This report provides general guidance only. Engage SourcifyChina’s certified chemical auditors for supplier-specific due diligence. Regulatory requirements vary by destination market.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Sourcing Insight: Cyanuric Acid from China
Cyanuric acid is a critical chemical intermediate used in disinfectants, pool sanitizers, and industrial applications. With rising global demand, procurement managers are under increasing pressure to identify reliable, cost-efficient suppliers—without compromising on quality or compliance.
China remains the world’s largest producer of cyanuric acid, accounting for over 80% of global supply. However, navigating the fragmented supplier landscape poses significant challenges: inconsistent quality, lack of transparency, and extended vetting cycles.
This is where SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List delivers measurable value.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | All factories on the Pro List undergo rigorous due diligence: business license verification, production capacity audits, export history checks, and quality control assessments. |
| Time-to-Source Reduction | Eliminates 3–6 weeks of supplier research, email exchanges, and qualification calls. Start negotiations faster. |
| Quality Assurance | Factories meet international standards (ISO, REACH, FDA compliance where applicable), reducing risk of defective batches or shipment rejections. |
| Transparent Capabilities | Detailed profiles include MOQs, pricing benchmarks, lead times, and past client references—no more chasing incomplete data. |
| Exclusive Access | Pro List suppliers are pre-negotiated for competitive pricing and favorable terms, giving buyers a strategic advantage. |
Average Time Saved: 27 hours per sourcing cycle
Procurement Cycle Acceleration: Up to 40%
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Don’t waste another quarter navigating unverified suppliers or managing supply chain disruptions.
Leverage SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List to:
✅ Secure reliable cyanuric acid supply at competitive pricing
✅ Minimize compliance and quality risks
✅ Accelerate time-to-contract with pre-qualified Chinese manufacturers
Contact our sourcing specialists now to receive your customized Pro List:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Available Monday–Friday, 8:00 AM – 5:00 PM CST. Response within 2 business hours.
SourcifyChina — Your Trusted Partner in Transparent, Efficient China Sourcing.
Data-Driven. Verified. Global-Ready.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
