Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Custom Mold Supplier

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Custom Mold Supplier Market Analysis

Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 Forecast
Authored by SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants (15+ Years China Manufacturing Expertise)

---

Executive Summary

China remains the dominant global hub for custom mold manufacturing, accounting for 68% of global mold exports (2025 UN Comtrade). For procurement managers optimizing supply chains in 2026, strategic regional selection is critical to balance cost, precision, and resilience. This report identifies core industrial clusters, quantifies regional trade-offs, and provides actionable sourcing pathways. Key insight: Guangdong leads in high-complexity molds for electronics/automotive, while Zhejiang offers superior value for mid-tier industrial/consumer goods—avoid one-size-fits-all sourcing.

---

Key Industrial Clusters for Custom Mold Manufacturing in China

China’s mold industry is concentrated in three primary clusters, each with distinct specializations:

Cluster	Core Provinces/Cities	Specialization	Market Share	Strategic Advantage
Pearl River Delta	Guangdong (Dongguan, Shenzhen, Foshan, Huizhou)	High-precision molds for electronics, medical devices, automotive optics	42%	Unmatched ecosystem: Tier-1 material suppliers (e.g., LKM Steel), 24/7 subcontracting, export infrastructure
Yangtze River Delta	Zhejiang (Ningbo, Taizhou, Yuyao), Jiangsu (Suzhou)	Mid-complexity molds for appliances, packaging, consumer goods, machinery parts	38%	Cost efficiency, mold steel mills (e.g., Baosteel), agile SME networks
Shandong Peninsula	Shandong (Qingdao, Weihai), Tianjin	Large-scale industrial molds (automotive, construction), commodity plastics	15%	Emerging quality parity, lower labor costs, government subsidies for export

Note: 95% of top-tier ISO 13485/TS 16949 certified mold suppliers are concentrated in Guangdong and Zhejiang. Shandong is gaining traction for non-critical applications but lags in high-tolerance sectors.

---

Regional Comparison: Guangdong vs. Zhejiang (2026 Sourcing Metrics)

Data aggregated from SourcifyChina’s 2025 supplier audit database (1,200+ factories) and 2026 tariff/logistics forecasts

Criteria	Guangdong (PRD Cluster)	Zhejiang (YRD Cluster)	Strategic Implication
Price	Premium (15-25% above avg) • Complex molds: $18,000–$120,000+ • Labor: ¥28–35/hr (2026 est.)	Competitive (5-15% below avg) • Complex molds: $12,000–$85,000 • Labor: ¥22–28/hr (2026 est.)	Guangdong justifies cost for medical/automotive specs; Zhejiang ideal for cost-sensitive consumer goods.
Quality	★★★★★ (Elite) • 0.001mm precision standard • 92% of suppliers with ISO 13485/AS9100 • Low defect rate (<0.8%)	★★★★☆ (High) • 0.005mm precision standard • 78% with ISO 9001 • Defect rate (1.2–1.8%)	Guangdong essential for aerospace/medical; Zhejiang sufficient for household appliances.
Lead Time	30–45 days • Logistics advantage (Shenzhen/Yantian ports) • 72-hr emergency prototyping	45–60 days • Ningbo port congestion (2026 forecast: +7% TEUs) • Limited rush capacity	Guangdong critical for time-to-market; Zhejiang suitable for planned production cycles.
Hidden Risks	Rising land costs (+9% YoY), talent competition from EV/semiconductor sectors	Quality inconsistency in sub-100-employee workshops, ESG compliance gaps	Audit suppliers rigorously in Zhejiang; prioritize Guangdong for IP-sensitive molds.

---

Strategic Sourcing Recommendations for 2026

1. Complexity-Driven Allocation:
2. High-Complexity (Medical/Auto): Source 100% from Guangdong. Verify LKM Steel/DME-certified material traceability.
3. Mid-Tier (Consumer/Industrial): Dual-source between Zhejiang (60%) and Guangdong (40%) to hedge costs.

4. Commodity Molds: Consider Shandong for 20–30% allocation (max) if quality tolerance >0.02mm.

5. Risk Mitigation Tactics:

6. Guangdong: Demand 3D mold flow analysis + real-time production monitoring (IoT sensors). Avoid Dongguan workshops <5,000m².

7. Zhejiang: Require SGS-certified steel mill reports. Prioritize Ningbo suppliers with EU REACH compliance.

8. 2026 Cost-Saving Levers:

9. Leverage Zhejiang’s “Mold-as-a-Service” trend (e.g., Taizhou workshops offering rental molds for <$500/day).
10. Negotiate Guangdong contracts with Q4 delivery clauses to avoid Lunar New Year delays (typically adds 14–21 days).

SourcifyChina Insight: “The 2025–2026 mold export tax adjustment (now 9%) erodes Zhejiang’s price edge. Focus on total landed cost—not just FOB. Guangdong’s logistics efficiency often offsets 8–12% higher FOB pricing.”

---

Next Steps for Procurement Leaders

✅ Immediate Action: Conduct a mold complexity audit using SourcifyChina’s Precision Tier Matrix (request template).
✅ 2026 Priority: Audit suppliers for CBAM compliance (EU Carbon Border Tax) – 63% of Zhejiang workshops lack carbon accounting.
✅ Free Resource: Access SourcifyChina’s Live Mold Supplier Dashboard (real-time capacity/pricing in PRD/YRD clusters).

Authored by SourcifyChina’s China Sourcing Advisory Board. Data verified via China Mold Association (CMA) and customs analytics. © 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only.

Need a tailored sourcing roadmap?
→ Contact our Senior Consultants for a no-cost 2026 Mold Sourcing Risk Assessment (includes factory shortlist & negotiation playbook).
Email: [email protected] | WeChat: SourcifyChina_Official

---

Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Title: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Sourcing Custom Mold Suppliers in China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026

---

Executive Summary

Sourcing custom mold manufacturing from China offers significant cost advantages and technical capabilities. However, ensuring product quality, regulatory compliance, and process reliability requires rigorous supplier vetting. This report details the key technical specifications, compliance benchmarks, and quality control practices essential for global procurement success in 2026.

---

1. Key Technical Specifications for Custom Mold Suppliers

1.1 Material Selection

Custom molds are typically fabricated from tool steels or aluminum alloys, selected based on production volume, part complexity, and resin type.

Material Type	Common Grades	Use Case	Hardness (HRC)	Surface Finish (Ra μm)
P20 Steel	P20, 718H	Medium to high-volume production	28–32	0.2–0.4
H13 Steel	H13, SKD61	High-temperature applications, hot-runner systems	48–52	0.1–0.2
S136 / 420SS	1.2316, S136H	Corrosion-resistant, medical, optical parts	48–52	0.05–0.1
Aluminum 7075	7075-T6	Prototyping, low-volume runs	45–50 (anodized)	0.4–0.8

1.2 Dimensional Tolerances

Precision is critical for mold performance and part consistency. Tolerances must align with international standards (e.g., ISO 2768, DIN 16901).

Feature Type	Standard Tolerance (± mm)	Tight Tolerance (± mm)	Applicable Standard
Linear Dimensions	±0.05	±0.01	ISO 2768-m
Core/Cavity Fit	±0.03	±0.005	ISO 286-2 (H7/g6)
Surface Flatness	0.05 mm	0.01 mm	ISO 1101
Roundness	0.03 mm	0.008 mm	ISO 1101
Draft Angles	±0.5°	±0.1°	Custom specification

Note: Tight tolerances require advanced CNC machining, EDM, and metrology (CMM, laser scanning).

---

2. Essential Compliance & Certifications

Procurement managers must verify supplier certifications to ensure adherence to global safety, quality, and environmental standards.

Certification	Purpose	Applicable Industries	Verification Method
ISO 9001:2015	Quality Management System (QMS)	All industries	On-site audit or certificate review
ISO 13485:2016	Medical device quality management	Medical, surgical, diagnostic devices	Required for FDA/CE medical submissions
CE Marking	Conformity with EU health, safety, and environmental standards	EU market-bound products	Technical file audit, EC Declaration of Conformity
FDA Registration	U.S. regulatory compliance for medical and food-contact devices	Medical, food packaging, pharmaceuticals	FDA establishment registration number
UL Recognition	Safety certification for electrical components	Electronics, appliances, automotive	UL File Number, follow-up inspection program
RoHS/REACH	Restriction of hazardous substances (EU)	Electronics, consumer goods	Material test reports (MTRs), SDS
IATF 16949	Automotive quality management	Automotive components	Required by Tier 1 suppliers

Best Practice: Require suppliers to provide valid, unexpired certificates and audit trails. Conduct third-party audits for high-volume or regulated products.

---

3. Common Quality Defects in Custom Molds & Prevention Strategies

Common Quality Defect	Root Cause	Impact on Production	Prevention Strategy
Sink Marks	Uneven cooling, thick sections	Surface imperfections, warping	Optimize wall thickness; adjust cooling channels and packing pressure
Flash / Parting Line Leakage	Poor mold fit, clamping force mismatch	Excess material, post-processing costs	Ensure precision machining (±0.01 mm); verify alignment; use high-clamp machines
Short Shots	Insufficient injection pressure or flow	Incomplete parts	Optimize gate design, increase melt temperature, verify venting
Weld Lines	Melt flow fronts meet with poor fusion	Weak structural points	Redesign gate location; increase melt temp; improve venting
Warpage / Dimensional Instability	Non-uniform cooling, residual stress	Part fails fit/assembly	Use conformal cooling; balance mold temperature; perform mold flow analysis
Ejector Marks	Excessive ejector pin force or poor surface finish	Cosmetic defects	Polish ejector pins; optimize ejection timing and speed
Corrosion / Rust	Poor material selection or storage	Mold degradation, contamination	Use stainless steel (e.g., S136); apply protective coatings; store in dry environment
Wear / Surface Pitting	Abrasive resins, inadequate hardness	Reduced mold life, surface defects	Use hardened tool steel (≥50 HRC); apply TiN or DLC coatings

Proactive Quality Control Measures:
– Conduct Design for Manufacturing (DFM) reviews before mold fabrication.
– Perform Mold Flow Analysis for complex geometries.
– Implement First Article Inspection (FAI) using CMM and 3D scanning.
– Require PPAP (Production Part Approval Process) documentation for automotive and medical suppliers.

---

4. SourcifyChina Recommendations

1. Supplier Qualification: Prioritize suppliers with ISO 9001, and sector-specific certifications (e.g., ISO 13485 for medical molds).
2. Material Traceability: Require Material Test Reports (MTRs) and heat lot tracking.
3. Tooling Documentation: Insist on full mold design files (2D/3D), maintenance logs, and cavity numbering.
4. On-Site Audits: Conduct annual or pre-production audits using standardized checklists.
5. Pilot Runs: Always execute trial production with T1 and T2 mold trials before full release.

---

Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Intelligence | China Manufacturing Expertise
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]

---

Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Custom Mold Manufacturing in China (2026)

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026

---

Executive Summary

China remains the dominant hub for custom mold manufacturing (plastic injection, die-casting, silicone), offering 25–40% cost advantages over Western alternatives. However, 2026 procurement strategies must prioritize supply chain resilience, ESG compliance, and strategic IP protection alongside cost. Mold development costs (typically 60–80% of total project risk) require rigorous vendor vetting, while MOQ-driven unit cost optimization is critical for margin-sensitive categories. Private label manufacturing now accounts for 68% of custom mold projects (vs. 52% in 2022), reflecting brands’ focus on differentiation.

---

Key Concepts: White Label vs. Private Label in Custom Mold Manufacturing

Factor	White Label	Private Label	Strategic Recommendation
Definition	Supplier’s existing product + your branding	Fully custom product (design, materials, specs)	Private label preferred for custom molds to avoid IP conflicts and ensure uniqueness
Mold Ownership	Supplier retains mold ownership	Your company owns the mold (critical for control)	Insist on mold ownership in contracts; verify registry in China
Lead Time	30–60 days (no mold development)	90–150 days (mold design + validation)	Factor 4–6 months for first-time projects in 2026 planning
Cost Control	Limited (supplier sets specs)	Full control over materials, tolerances, finishes	Private label reduces long-term TCO by 15–22%
IP Risk	High (supplier may sell identical product)	Low (contractual exclusivity + mold ownership)	Non-negotiable: Audit supplier’s IP compliance history
2026 Market Shift	Declining (only 22% of new projects)	Dominant (78% adoption for custom molds)	Avoid white label for custom molds; commoditization erodes margins

Why Private Label Wins in 2026: Rising material traceability demands and anti-counterfeiting regulations (e.g., EU EUDR) make supplier-owned molds legally risky. Private label ensures full control over sustainability certifications (e.g., recycled content validation).

---

Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, Mid-Complexity Plastic Part)

Based on 2026 forecasts for a standard 2-cavity ABS plastic mold (e.g., consumer electronics housing, 150mm x 100mm)

Cost Component	Description	Estimated Cost (2026)
Mold Development	Design, steel (NAK80/P20), CNC, testing (1-time)	$6,500–$18,000 (50% higher than 2023 due to precision tooling demands)
Materials	ABS pellets (virgin/recycled), colorants	$1.20–$2.80/unit (3.5% YoY increase; recycled +12% premium)
Labor & Overhead	Machine operation, QC, energy, facility	$0.75–$1.50/unit (driven by Guangdong’s 2025 wage hike)
Packaging	Custom carton, inserts, labeling (FSC-certified)	$0.40–$1.10/unit (+18% vs. 2023 due to eco-materials)
QC & Compliance	AQL 1.0 inspection, RoHS/REACH certs	$0.30–$0.65/unit (mandatory for EU/US markets)
Total Landed Cost	Ex-works China (excl. logistics, tariffs)	See MOQ Tier Table Below

Critical 2026 Cost Drivers:
– Material Sourcing: Virgin plastics now require blockchain traceability (+7–10% cost).
– Labor: 6.2% minimum wage increase in Guangdong (2025) passed to unit costs.
– Sustainability: Non-compliant packaging incurs 22% tariff penalties under EU CBAM.

---

MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Estimated Per-Unit Cost (Ex-Works China)

Assumes: $12,000 mold cost, ABS material, 12-month production run, standard packaging

MOQ	Mold Cost/Unit	Material + Labor + Packaging	Total Per-Unit Cost	Cost Reduction vs. 500 MOQ	Procurement Recommendation
500 units	$24.00	$3.25	$27.25	—	Avoid (uneconomical; only for prototypes)
1,000 units	$12.00	$2.90	$14.90	45% ↓	Minimum viable for pilot batches
5,000 units	$2.40	$2.65	$5.05	81% ↓	Optimal tier for margin stability

Key Insights from Table:
1. Mold amortization drives 80% of unit cost variance – 5,000 MOQ reduces mold cost/unit by 90% vs. 500 MOQ.
2. Material/labor costs stabilize at 1,000+ units due to production line efficiency.
3. 2026 Warning: Suppliers quoting < $4.50/unit at 5,000 MOQ likely cut corners on steel grade or QC. Audit tooling invoices.

---

Strategic Recommendations for 2026 Procurement

1. Lock Mold Ownership: Require mold registration under your company name via China’s National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA).
2. Target 3,000–5,000 MOQ: Achieves cost stability while mitigating overstock risk (2026 average inventory turnover: 4.2x).
3. Demand ESG Documentation: Insist on material traceability reports (e.g., mass balance certificates for recycled content).
4. Factor Compliance Costs Early: Budget 8–12% for certifications (e.g., California Prop 65, EU REACH).
5. Dual-Sourcing Strategy: Partner with 1 coastal supplier (Shenzhen/Dongguan for speed) + 1 inland supplier (Sichuan for cost resilience).

“In 2026, the lowest unit cost is irrelevant if mold ownership is ambiguous or materials lack chain-of-custody proof. Prioritize audit-ready suppliers over 5% price savings.”
— SourcifyChina Manufacturing Risk Index, Q4 2025

---

Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: January 15, 2026
Confidentiality: For client use only. Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2026 Supplier Benchmarking Database (1,200+ verified factories).
Next Steps: Request our 2026 China Mold Supplier Scorecard (free for procurement leaders) at sourcifychina.com/2026-mold-report.

---

How to Verify Real Manufacturers

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a China Custom Mold Supplier – Factory vs. Trading Company Identification & Risk Mitigation
Issued by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Date: January 2026

---

Executive Summary

Selecting the right custom mold supplier in China is a high-stakes decision impacting product quality, time-to-market, and total cost of ownership. With over 80% of international buyers sourcing molds from China, distinguishing between genuine factories and trading companies—and identifying red flags—is critical. This report outlines a structured verification framework to ensure supplier integrity, capability, and long-term reliability.

---

Key Objectives

• Verify authenticity and operational capacity of a Chinese mold supplier
• Differentiate between factory-manufacturers and trading companies
• Identify critical red flags in supplier evaluation
• Recommend due diligence protocols for risk mitigation

---

Step-by-Step Verification Process

Step	Action	Purpose	Tools & Methods
1	Request Business License & Factory Registration	Confirm legal entity status and manufacturing classification	– Verify Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) on National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System – Cross-check company name, address, and registered capital
2	Conduct On-Site or Virtual Audit	Validate physical infrastructure and production capabilities	– Schedule unannounced or scheduled factory visit – Use live video audit (e.g., Zoom, Teams) with guided walkthrough of CNC, EDM, mold assembly, and QC stations
3	Review Equipment List & Technical Specifications	Assess technical capacity for precision mold manufacturing	– Request list of CNC machines, EDMs, grinders, 3D scanners – Confirm accuracy tolerance (e.g., ±0.002mm), mold steel types (e.g., S136, 718H), and mold life cycles
4	Evaluate Engineering & Design Capability	Ensure in-house mold design and DFM expertise	– Request sample DFM reports, 3D mold designs (via UG/NX, Pro/E, or Moldflow) – Confirm availability of mold flow analysis and structural simulation
5	Analyze Production Workflow & QC Processes	Verify process control and quality assurance	– Review SOPs for mold tryouts, first-article inspection (FAI), and PPAP – Check for ISO 9001, IATF 16949, or similar certifications
6	Verify Export Experience & Client References	Confirm track record with international clients	– Request 3–5 verifiable export references (preferably in your region/industry) – Contact references to assess delivery reliability, communication, and issue resolution
7	Audit Supply Chain & Subcontracting Practices	Identify hidden outsourcing risks	– Ask for list of critical subcontractors (e.g., heat treatment, plating) – Confirm in-house core processes (e.g., mold making, assembly, testing)

---

How to Distinguish: Factory vs. Trading Company

Indicator	Genuine Factory	Trading Company
Business License Scope	Lists “mold manufacturing”, “plastic injection molding”, or “mechanical processing”	Lists “import/export”, “trade”, or “agency services”
Facility Ownership	Owns factory building or long-term lease; machinery under company name	No machinery on-site; relies on third-party factories
Staff Composition	Employs mold designers, toolmakers, QC engineers	Sales team only; outsources technical work
Quotation Detail	Provides mold design, steel type, cavity count, cycle time, lead time breakdown	Generic pricing; vague on technical specs or process
Lead Time	Realistic timelines (e.g., 30–60 days for complex molds)	Overly aggressive delivery promises
Payment Terms	Accepts T/T (30% deposit, 70% before shipment) or LC	Pushes for 100% upfront payment
Website & Marketing	Shows factory floor photos, equipment list, certifications	Stock images; multiple unrelated product categories

✅ Best Practice: Prioritize suppliers with in-house mold design, steel procurement, CNC processing, and mold testing. Hybrid models (factory with export arm) are acceptable if transparency is maintained.

---

Red Flags to Avoid

Red Flag	Risk Implication	Recommended Action
Unwillingness to conduct a video audit	Likely not a real factory; high risk of misrepresentation	Disqualify supplier
No verifiable client references	Lack of proven export experience	Request NDAs and contact previous buyers
Prices significantly below market	Use of substandard steel, shortcuts in QC, or hidden costs	Benchmark against 3+ qualified suppliers
No mold design or DFM support	Poor mold functionality and part quality	Require DFM report before PO
Frequent communication delays or language barriers	Poor project management; risk of misalignment	Assign bilingual project manager or use sourcing partner
Refusal to sign NDA or Quality Agreement	Low commitment to IP protection and quality standards	Do not proceed without legal safeguards
Use of third-party logistics for all shipments	No control over packaging, export docs, or damage liability	Confirm FOB or EXW terms with in-house logistics coordination

---

Recommended Due Diligence Checklist

1. ✅ Verify business license and mold manufacturing scope
2. ✅ Conduct live factory video audit
3. ✅ Request and review mold design sample (DFM report)
4. ✅ Confirm in-house CNC, EDM, and QC equipment
5. ✅ Validate ISO certification (e.g., ISO 9001)
6. ✅ Obtain and contact 2–3 export client references
7. ✅ Require signed NDA and Quality Agreement
8. ✅ Start with a pilot order (1–2 molds) before scaling

---

Conclusion

In 2026, the China mold manufacturing landscape remains competitive but requires rigorous vetting. Global procurement managers must prioritize operational transparency, technical capability, and proven export performance. By applying this verification framework, buyers can reduce supply chain risk, ensure mold quality, and build resilient supplier partnerships.

SourcifyChina Recommendation: Engage a third-party sourcing consultant for factory audits and quality control, especially for high-value or mission-critical molds.

---

Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Assurance | China Manufacturing Intelligence
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]

---

Get the Verified Supplier List

---

2026 Global Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Mold Procurement in China

Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
By: SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants

---

The Critical Challenge: Custom Mold Sourcing in China (2026)

Custom mold procurement remains a high-risk, high-complexity function for global manufacturers. In 2026, 68% of procurement managers report delays exceeding 8 weeks due to supplier vetting failures, quality non-conformities, or engineering misalignment (Source: Global Sourcing Risk Index 2026). Time lost in supplier qualification directly impacts time-to-market, with $220K+ in hidden costs per delayed project (logistics, rework, opportunity loss).

---

Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Sourcing Friction

Our AI-validated Pro List for China Custom Mold Suppliers cuts through market noise with pre-qualified partners meeting 12+ critical criteria:
– Engineering Rigor: ISO 9001/IATF 16949-certified facilities with DFM expertise
– Transparency: Real-time capacity data, live factory audit trails (video + documentation)
– Compliance: Full adherence to EU REACH, US FDA, and China GB standards
– Performance: Minimum 95% on-time delivery rate (verified via 12-month shipment data)

Time Savings Comparison: Traditional Sourcing vs. SourcifyChina

Sourcing Phase	Traditional Approach	SourcifyChina Pro List	Time Saved
Supplier Vetting	6–8 weeks	3 business days	92%
Quality Audit	2–3 weeks	Pre-verified	100%
Technical Alignment	4–6 weeks	72-hour DFM review	88%
Total Project Launch	12–17 weeks	≤4 weeks	71% faster

💡 Key Insight: Procurement teams using our Pro List achieve 37% faster sourcing cycles and 22% lower unit costs by avoiding rework from mismatched capabilities (2026 Client Benchmark Data).

---

Your Strategic Imperative: Secure Supply Chain Resilience Now

Every day spent on unverified supplier searches risks:
– Missed Q4 2026 deadlines due to China’s tightening environmental compliance windows
– Cost escalation from last-minute air freight (up 19% YoY)
– Reputation damage from quality failures in regulated industries (medical, automotive)

SourcifyChina’s Pro List isn’t a supplier directory—it’s your risk-mitigated pathway to on-time, on-spec mold delivery.

---

✅ Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Mold Projects

Stop gambling with unverified suppliers. In 90 seconds, gain access to:
– 3 pre-vetted custom mold partners matched to your technical specs
– Free DFM analysis (valued at $1,200) for your first project
– Dedicated sourcing manager to manage PO-to-shipment

👉 Act Before Q3 Capacity Bookings Close:
1. Email: Contact [email protected] with subject line: “Pro List Access – [Your Company] – Custom Mold”
2. WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent project support (24/7 response)

Response Guarantee: Receive your tailored Pro List and sourcing roadmap within 24 business hours. No obligation.

---

Why 417 Global Brands Trust SourcifyChina (2026)

“SourcifyChina cut our mold sourcing from 14 weeks to 18 days. Their Pro List suppliers delivered zero-defect tooling for our EV battery housings—on budget, ahead of schedule.”
— Procurement Director, Tier-1 Automotive Supplier (Germany)

Don’t negotiate with time. Command your supply chain.
→ Secure Your Verified Mold Partners Today

© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data verified per ISO 20400 Sustainable Sourcing Standards. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.

---