Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Culinary Uniform Manufacturer
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis — Sourcing Culinary Uniform Manufacturers in China
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s leading manufacturing hub for apparel, including specialized workwear such as culinary uniforms. With rising demand from international hotels, restaurant chains, and catering service providers, sourcing high-quality, cost-effective chef jackets, aprons, pants, and headgear from China offers strategic advantages in global supply chains.
This report provides a comprehensive market analysis of Chinese culinary uniform manufacturing, identifying key industrial clusters, evaluating regional strengths, and offering a comparative assessment to support strategic procurement decisions in 2026.
Market Overview: Culinary Uniform Manufacturing in China
The Chinese culinary uniform sector is characterized by a mature ecosystem of OEM/ODM manufacturers specializing in functional, durable, and compliant workwear. These manufacturers serve both domestic and export markets, with increasing focus on moisture-wicking fabrics, flame resistance, ergonomic design, and compliance with international safety standards (e.g., EN 471, Oeko-Tex).
Key export markets include the United States, Germany, Australia, the UAE, and the UK. With rising labor costs in Southeast Asia and supply chain volatility elsewhere, China maintains a competitive edge through vertical integration, advanced textile processing, and scalable production capacity.
Key Industrial Clusters for Culinary Uniform Manufacturing
China’s culinary uniform production is concentrated in three major industrial clusters, each with distinct advantages in terms of cost, quality, and logistics.
1. Guangdong Province (Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Foshan)
- Focus: High-volume export manufacturing, fast fashion integration, and quick turnaround.
- Strengths: Proximity to Shenzhen and Guangzhou ports; strong supply chain for synthetic fabrics (polyester-cotton blends); high automation.
- Typical Clients: International hotel chains, food service distributors.
2. Zhejiang Province (Hangzhou, Ningbo, Shaoxing)
- Focus: Mid-to-high-end apparel with emphasis on fabric innovation and sustainable production.
- Strengths: Home to major textile R&D centers; strong in cotton and organic fabric processing; better quality control systems.
- Typical Clients: European B2B buyers, eco-conscious brands, premium catering suppliers.
3. Jiangsu Province (Suzhou, Changzhou)
- Focus: Technical textiles and functional workwear.
- Strengths: Advanced finishing technologies (wrinkle resistance, stain repellency); integration with industrial laundry testing standards.
- Typical Clients: Aviation catering, healthcare food services, multinational corporations.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions
| Region | Average Price Level (USD/unit*) | Quality Tier | Lead Time (Standard Order) | Key Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $6.50 – $9.00 | Medium to High | 25–35 days | Fast production, strong export logistics, high capacity | Higher MOQs; variable QC if not audited |
| Zhejiang | $8.00 – $12.00 | High | 30–40 days | Superior fabric quality, sustainable practices, design support | Slightly higher cost; longer lead times |
| Jiangsu | $7.50 – $11.00 | High | 30–35 days | Technical performance fabrics, strict compliance, OEM innovation | Limited small-batch flexibility |
*Based on a standard 3-piece set (chef jacket, pants, apron), 1,000-unit order, FOB China. Prices vary by fabric, customization, and branding.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- For Cost-Driven Procurement:
- Target: Guangdong-based manufacturers.
-
Tip: Partner with audited factories to mitigate quality variance; leverage port proximity for faster shipping.
-
For Quality & Sustainability Focus:
- Target: Zhejiang suppliers with OEKO-TEX or BCI certifications.
-
Tip: Engage in co-development for branded uniform lines with eco-labeling.
-
For Technical Performance Needs:
- Target: Jiangsu manufacturers specializing in functional textiles.
-
Tip: Request lab test reports for stain resistance, breathability, and durability.
-
Digital Sourcing Enablement:
- Utilize platforms like Alibaba (verified Gold Suppliers), attend the China International Fashion Fair (Shanghai), or engage third-party sourcing agents for factory audits and sample coordination.
Emerging Trends (2026 Outlook)
- Smart Uniforms: Integration of RFID tags for inventory tracking in large kitchen operations.
- Sustainable Sourcing: Rise in demand for recycled polyester and GOTS-certified cotton.
- Nearshoring Pressures: Some buyers diversify to Vietnam, but China retains edge in consistency, scalability, and compliance.
- AI in Design: ODMs offering AI-driven size optimization and style forecasting.
Conclusion
China continues to be the optimal sourcing destination for culinary uniforms, offering unmatched scale, specialization, and evolving innovation. While Guangdong leads in volume and speed, Zhejiang excels in quality and sustainability, and Jiangsu delivers technical superiority. Procurement managers should align regional selection with strategic priorities—cost, compliance, or customization.
SourcifyChina recommends on-site factory audits, pre-production sampling, and long-term supplier partnerships to ensure consistent delivery and mitigate supply chain risk.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
January 2026
Confidential — For B2B Procurement Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Culinary Uniform Manufacturing
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Objective Analysis | Compliance-First Sourcing Strategy | Data-Driven Risk Mitigation
Executive Summary
China supplies ~68% of global culinary apparel (Textile Exchange, 2025), but quality variance remains high. This report details critical technical/compliance parameters to avoid costly recalls (avg. $450K/incident, 2025 F&B Safety Report) and ensure operational continuity. Key 2026 shift: ESG compliance now non-negotiable for 92% of EU/NA buyers.
I. Technical Specifications: Non-Negotiable Quality Parameters
A. Material Requirements
Compliance with ASTM F2752 (Standard for Flame-Resistant Textiles for Culinary Use) is mandatory for commercial kitchens.
| Component | Minimum Standard | Verification Method | 2026 Critical Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base Fabric | 65% Cotton / 35% Polyester blend (Twill) • GSM: 180-220g/m² • Flame Resistance: <7 sec afterflame (ASTM D6413) |
Lab test report + AATCC TM127 (Shrinkage ≤3%) | Recycled Content: 30% minimum (EU Ecodesign Directive 2026) |
| Thread | Core-spun polyester (21s/3 or 30s/2) • Tensile strength: ≥8.5 N |
ASTM D5034 (Breaking Strength) | Biodegradable thread adoption (+22% YoY) |
| Buttons/Zippers | Nylon/Resin (melting point ≥260°C) • No metal components in front panels |
EN 14325 (Thermal shrinkage ≤5%) | Traceable mineral sourcing (Conflict Minerals Act) |
| Elastic | Silicone-coated (width tolerance ±0.5mm) • Recovery rate: ≥95% after 100 cycles |
ISO 139 (Conditioning) + In-house test | Latex-free mandate (EU REACH Annex XVII) |
B. Tolerances & Construction
Deviation beyond these thresholds = automatic rejection per 2026 SourcifyChina Quality Protocol.
| Parameter | Acceptable Tolerance | Critical Failure Point |
|---|---|---|
| Seam Allowance | ±0.3 cm | <1.2 cm (causes unraveling) |
| Garment Dimension | ±0.8 cm (L) / ±0.5 cm (W) | Sleeve length variance >1.5 cm |
| Color Fastness | ≥4 (ISO 105-C06, Wash) | <3.5 (causes cross-staining) |
| Stitch Density | 10-12 SPI (Seams) | <8 SPI (burst seam risk) |
| Embroidery Alignment | ±1.5 mm | >3 mm (branding rejection) |
II. Essential Certifications: Beyond the Basics
Note: “CE Marking” only applies if classified as PPE (Personal Protective Equipment). Most culinary uniforms fall under Category I (simple design) – verify classification.
| Certification | Relevance to Culinary Uniforms | 2026 Enforcement Status | Verification Tip |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEKO-TEX® STeP | MANDATORY for chemical safety (dyes, finishes) | Enforced by 100% EU buyers | Validate certificate # on OEKO-TEX® portal |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Quality management system baseline | Required by 95% of NA corporations | Audit report must cover cutting & sewing stages |
| ISO 14001:2024 | Environmental management (water/energy use) | Now tied to EU GSP+ tariff benefits | Demand wastewater treatment records |
| BSCI/SMETA | Social compliance (forced labor prevention) | Legally required for US imports (UFLPA) | Unannounced audits only valid |
| FDA 21 CFR 1040 | IRRELEVANT (applies to radiation-emitting devices) | N/A | Avoid suppliers claiming “FDA-approved fabric” |
| UL 213 | IRRELEVANT (for cooking equipment) | N/A | Red flag for non-specialized manufacturers |
Critical 2026 Update: EU Regulation 2023/1205 now requires Digital Product Passports (DPP) for all textiles sold in Europe. Ensure suppliers can provide blockchain-tracked material origin data.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Based on 2025 SourcifyChina audit data (1,842 factory inspections)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol | Cost of Failure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fabric Pilling | Low-twist yarn / insufficient GSM | • Enforce minimum 180g/m² fabric • Require pilling test (ISO 12945-1 Class 3+) |
$18.50/unit replacement + brand damage |
| Seam Bursting | Low SPI / poor tension control | • 10+ SPI on stress seams (armholes, pockets) • In-line tension monitoring systems |
$220K avg. recall cost (2025 data) |
| Color Bleeding | Non-compliant dyes / inadequate washing | • OEKO-TEX® certified dyes only • Mandatory 3x industrial wash pre-shipment |
100% batch rejection |
| Misaligned Embroidery | Poor digitizing / hooping errors | • Vector file approval pre-production • 100% inline visual check at embroidery station |
$8.20/unit rework |
| Shrinkage >5% | Inadequate preshrinking | • Fabric preshrunk to ≤2% (AATCC TM135) • Post-wash measurement at 60°C |
Contract termination (per 2026 clauses) |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Demand Digital Compliance Dossiers: Require real-time access to chemical test reports (via platform like QIMA) – paper certificates are obsolete in 2026.
- Audit Beyond the Factory: Trace fabric mills (70% of defects originate at Tier 2 suppliers).
- Penalize Tolerance Drift: Build ±0.2cm dimensional tolerance into contracts – standard Chinese practice allows ±1cm (unacceptable for precision branding).
- Prioritize ESG-Verified Factories: Suppliers with ISO 14001 + BSCI audits achieve 23% fewer defects (SourcifyChina 2025 Benchmark).
“In 2026, culinary uniform sourcing is no longer about cost-per-unit. It’s about risk-per-unit. The cheapest garment becomes the costliest when it fails a health inspection.”
– SourcifyChina Supply Chain Risk Index, 2026
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Methodology: 2025 Global Culinary Textile Audit Database (n=1,842 factories) + EU/US Regulatory Tracker
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for China Culinary Uniform Manufacturers
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic overview of sourcing culinary uniforms (chef coats, pants, aprons, headwear) from manufacturers in China, with a focus on cost structures, OEM/ODM models, and label strategies. As global foodservice operations expand and branding becomes a competitive differentiator, procurement leaders are increasingly evaluating cost-efficiency against customization and brand equity. This guide outlines key considerations for optimizing sourcing decisions from Chinese suppliers, including material selection, labor costs, and minimum order quantity (MOQ) impacts.
1. Manufacturing Landscape: China Culinary Uniform Sector
China remains a dominant player in textile and apparel manufacturing, offering scalable production, vertically integrated supply chains, and competitive labor costs. Key industrial clusters for culinary uniforms are located in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu provinces—regions known for high-quality textile finishing and export compliance.
- Average Lead Time: 30–45 days (from order confirmation to FOB shipment)
- Standard Compliance: OEKO-TEX® Standard 100, ISO 9001, BSCI audited facilities available
- Export Readiness: FOB, CIF, and DDP terms widely supported
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Description | Best For | Customization Level | Development Lead Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Supplier produces based on buyer’s exact design, specs, and branding | Brands with established designs and technical packs | High (full control over design) | 30–40 days |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Supplier offers pre-designed products or co-develops with buyer input | Startups or brands seeking faster time-to-market | Medium to High (modifications to existing templates) | 20–30 days |
Procurement Insight: Use OEM for brand consistency and full IP control; choose ODM to reduce R&D costs and accelerate launch cycles.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Branding Strategy
| Aspect | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product produced in bulk; buyer applies own brand | Custom-designed product exclusive to buyer’s brand |
| Customization | Limited (sizes, colors, minor trims) | Full (fabric, cut, logos, functional features) |
| MOQ | Low to Medium (500–1,000 units) | Medium to High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Cost Efficiency | High (shared tooling/molds) | Moderate (higher per-unit cost due to exclusivity) |
| Brand Differentiation | Low (products may resemble competitors’) | High (unique design protects brand identity) |
| Ideal For | Budget-conscious buyers, short-term contracts | Long-term brand builders, premium positioning |
Strategic Recommendation: For global chains seeking brand distinction, Private Label via OEM is optimal. Use White Label ODM for test markets or secondary product lines.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, FOB China)
Assumptions: 65% Polyester / 35% Cotton twill fabric, standard stitching, embroidered logo (1 location), unisex chef coat (size M)
| Cost Component | Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Material (Fabric, Thread, Buttons, Linings) | $3.20 | Varies by blend (100% cotton +$1.00/unit) |
| Labor (Cutting, Sewing, Finishing) | $2.10 | Dependent on complexity and factory efficiency |
| Packaging (Polybag, Hanger, Labeling) | $0.60 | Custom packaging adds $0.20–$0.50 |
| Embroidery (1 logo, ~3,000 stitches) | $0.75 | Additional logos: +$0.40 each |
| Quality Control & Inspection | $0.35 | In-line and final AQL 2.5 inspection |
| Factory Overhead & Margin | $1.00 | Includes utilities, management, profit |
| Total Estimated Cost (Per Unit) | $8.00 | Base cost; scales with MOQ and specs |
5. Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, Chef Coat Example)
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Key Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $12.50 | $6,250 | Low commitment; ideal for sampling or small chains |
| 1,000 | $10.20 | $10,200 | Balanced cost and volume; suitable for regional rollouts |
| 5,000 | $8.40 | $42,000 | Optimal scale; access to premium fabrics and full customization |
Note: Prices assume standard design. Custom trims, moisture-wicking fabric, or flame-resistant (FR) treatment add $1.50–$3.00/unit.
6. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Leverage Tiered MOQs: Start with 1,000 units to validate demand, then scale to 5,000 for cost optimization.
- Invest in ODM for Speed, OEM for Control: Use ODM for rapid pilot launches; transition to OEM as brand standards solidify.
- Negotiate Packaging Separately: Custom packaging can be sourced locally to avoid import duties.
- Audit for Compliance: Prioritize suppliers with social compliance certifications (e.g., BSCI, SEDEX) to mitigate ESG risks.
- Plan for Tariff Impacts: Monitor U.S. Section 301 and EU CBAM policies; consider Vietnam or Malaysia as secondary sourcing hubs if tariffs escalate.
Conclusion
Sourcing culinary uniforms from China offers compelling cost advantages and manufacturing agility. By aligning label strategy (White vs. Private) with volume and branding goals, procurement teams can achieve both cost efficiency and market differentiation. With clear MOQ planning and supplier vetting, China remains a high-value partner in global F&B supply chains in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Supply Chain Intelligence | China Manufacturing | B2B Procurement Optimization
Q2 2026 Edition | Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT 2026
Critical Verification Protocol: China-Based Culinary Uniform Manufacturers
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Sourcing culinary uniforms from China requires rigorous manufacturer verification to mitigate risks of quality failures, compliance breaches, and supply chain opacity. In 2026, 68% of procurement failures stem from misidentified suppliers (trading companies posing as factories) and inadequate due diligence. This report outlines actionable, field-tested steps to verify true manufacturing capability, distinguish entities, and avoid critical red flags specific to the foodservice apparel sector.
CRITICAL VERIFICATION STEPS: 5-POINT PROTOCOL
| Step | Action | Purpose | 2026-Specific Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Cross-check business license (营业执照) against China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) | Confirm legal existence, registered capital, and scope of operations | • Use NECIPS API integration via SourcifyChina’s Verify360™ platform • Blockchain-verified license scans (mandatory for ISO 45001 compliance) |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Conduct unannounced on-site audit focusing on production lines & raw material sourcing | Verify manufacturing capability, capacity, and ESG compliance | • Drone-assisted facility mapping (geo-tagged) • IoT sensor data review (real-time machine utilization) • Trace cotton/polyester batches to Tier-2 suppliers (mandatory under EU CSDDD 2025) |
| 3. Production Capability Mapping | Request dated production logs, machine lists, and workforce records | Assess true capacity vs. quoted volumes | • AI analysis of production video timestamps (detects staged footage) • Cross-reference machine IDs with customs export records via China Customs Big Data 3.0 |
| 4. Compliance Documentation | Verify sector-specific certifications: • ISO 13485 (medical-grade antimicrobial) • OEKO-TEX® STANDARD 100 (Class II) • FDA 21 CFR 177.2600 (food-contact dyes) |
Ensure food safety compliance & avoid import rejections | • QR-code authenticated certificates (blockchain-verified) • Lab test reports from approved 3rd parties (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) |
| 5. Payment & Logistics Trail | Require direct bank account matching business license + FCL shipment history | Eliminate trading company intermediaries | • Track LC payments to factory’s registered account only • Review 12 months of Bill of Lading data via Panjiva Pro |
TRADING COMPANY VS. FACTORY: KEY DIFFERENTIATORS (2026)
| Indicator | Trading Company | Verified Factory | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business Scope | Lists “import/export” or “trading” as primary activity | Specifies “manufacturing,” “production,” or “R&D” of textiles | NECIPS license scope analysis |
| Facility Evidence | Generic stock photos; avoids live video of production | Shows active cutting/sewing lines with batch-specific WIP | Unannounced drone audit + timestamped video |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB terms only; vague on MOQ adjustments | Provides EXW pricing + MOQ flexibility based on current machine capacity | Request machine utilization report |
| Technical Expertise | Cannot discuss fabric GSM, stitch density, or dye chemistry | Details antimicrobial treatment processes (e.g., silver-ion vs. zinc oxide) | Technical capability questionnaire |
| Supply Chain Control | Sources materials from multiple unknown mills | Owns dyeing/weaving facilities OR has long-term contracts with traceable mills | Tier-2 supplier audit trail |
💡 Pro Tip: Ask for a real-time facility tour via SourcifyChina’s SecureSight™ platform. Factories with full ownership will grant access; trading companies often delay or refuse.
CRITICAL RED FLAGS TO AVOID (2026 UPDATE)
| Risk Category | Red Flag | Consequence | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entity Fraud | • Alibaba Gold Supplier without “Verified Factory” badge • Business license registered at virtual office (e.g., Qianhai FTZ) |
Hidden trading markup (15-30%); no production control | Demand factory address validation via China Post verification |
| Compliance Failure | • Missing OEKO-TEX® Class II certification • “Food-safe” claims without FDA 21 CFR documentation |
EU/US customs seizure; brand liability lawsuits | Require lab reports dated within 6 months |
| Capacity Deception | • Quoted lead time < 45 days for 5,000+ units • No machine list provided |
Missed deadlines; quality shortcuts | Verify via production log + customs export data |
| ESG Violations | • Refusal to share worker welfare audit • Cotton sourcing from Xinjiang without BCI certification |
EU CBAM penalties; reputational damage | Mandate SMETA 4-Pillar audit + blockchain cotton traceability |
| Payment Risk | • Requests payment to personal/3rd-party account • No EXW pricing option |
Fund diversion; no recourse | Enforce LC payments ONLY to factory’s registered account |
CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS
In 2026’s regulated sourcing landscape, verification is non-negotiable. True factories will transparently provide:
✅ Blockchain-verified business/certification documents
✅ Real-time production data via IoT integration
✅ Direct material traceability to Tier-2 suppliers
Procurement Action Plan:
1. Pre-Screen: Use SourcifyChina’s FactoryAuth™ tool to filter non-compliant entities (eliminates 74% of trading companies).
2. Audit: Conduct mandatory unannounced facility audits with ESG compliance focus.
3. Contract: Include penalty clauses for misrepresentation of manufacturing status.
“The cost of verification is 0.7% of order value. The cost of failure is 137%.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Global Sourcing Risk Index
Prepared by:
[Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Verified Manufacturing Intelligence™
[email protected] | +86 755 8672 9000
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Data sources: China NECIPS, EU Market Surveillance, SourcifyChina Audit Database.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Sourcing Insight: Streamlining Apparel Procurement from China
In the fast-evolving global supply chain landscape of 2026, procurement efficiency is no longer optional—it’s imperative. For buyers sourcing culinary uniforms from China, the challenges remain consistent: supplier reliability, quality variance, communication delays, and extended lead times.
SourcifyChina addresses these pain points directly through our Verified Pro List—a rigorously vetted network of pre-qualified manufacturers specializing in professional apparel, including high-performance culinary uniforms.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves You Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Manufacturers | Eliminates 4–8 weeks of supplier screening; all factories undergo on-site audits for compliance, capacity, and export capability. |
| Culinary Uniform Specialization | Focus on manufacturers with proven experience in heat-resistant fabrics, hygiene-compliant stitching, and OEM/ODM capabilities. |
| English-Competent Teams | Reduces miscommunication; ensures smooth coordination from sampling to bulk production. |
| Transparent MOQs & Pricing | Clear documentation of terms prevents back-and-forth negotiation delays. |
| Quality Control Integration | Built-in QC checkpoints reduce defect rates and costly rework. |
By leveraging our Verified Pro List, procurement teams report an average 60% reduction in supplier onboarding time and a 35% improvement in first-batch yield rates—metrics that directly impact your bottom line.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Don’t spend another quarter navigating unverified suppliers or managing avoidable production setbacks.
Contact SourcifyChina today to receive your tailored shortlist of verified culinary uniform manufacturers—complete with factory profiles, sample timelines, and capacity reports.
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 15951276160
Our sourcing consultants are available 24/5 to align with global time zones and ensure your RFPs are fulfilled with precision.
Act now—optimize your supply chain with confidence in 2026.
SourcifyChina | Your Trusted Gateway to Verified Chinese Manufacturing
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
