Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Cross Lace Underwear Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Cross Lace Underwear Manufacturers in China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: March 2026
Executive Summary
The Chinese cross lace underwear manufacturing sector remains a cornerstone of the global intimate apparel supply chain, offering competitive pricing, scalable production, and evolving design capabilities. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of key industrial clusters, regional strengths, and comparative performance metrics to support strategic sourcing decisions in 2026.
Cross lace underwear—characterized by intricate lace overlays, crisscross back designs, and premium fabric blends—requires specialized knitting, embroidery, and finishing capabilities. China’s mature textile ecosystem, particularly in Guangdong and Zhejiang provinces, continues to dominate production, serving both fast-fashion retailers and premium lingerie brands.
This analysis identifies two primary manufacturing hubs—Guangdong and Zhejiang—and evaluates them across three critical procurement KPIs: Price, Quality, and Lead Time.
Key Industrial Clusters for Cross Lace Underwear Manufacturing
1. Guangdong Province
- Primary Cities: Guangzhou (Panyu District), Shantou (Chaoyang District), Shenzhen
- Cluster Profile:
- Largest concentration of lingerie OEM/ODM manufacturers in China.
- Home to over 60% of national intimate apparel exporters.
- Specialized in high-volume production with strong capabilities in lace application, elastic banding, and seamless integration.
- Proximity to Hong Kong facilitates export logistics and design collaboration.
- Leading manufacturers: Cosmode, Regina Miracle (Shantou), Bloomchic, Lingerie China Group.
2. Zhejiang Province
- Primary Cities: Yiwu, Huzhou (Nanxun District), Hangzhou
- Cluster Profile:
- Dominant in lace fabric production (Yiwu is the world’s largest wholesale market for small commodities, including lace trims).
- Strong backward integration—many manufacturers control both lace weaving and garment assembly.
- Higher focus on mid-to-high-end products with attention to detail and fabric innovation.
- Emerging hub for sustainable and OEKO-TEX certified production.
- Leading manufacturers: Zhejiang Juhua Group, Yiwu Lace Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Intimate Wear Tech.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Average Lead Time (from PO to FOB) | Key Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High) | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Good to Very Good) | 45–60 days | – High production scalability – Rapid sampling – Strong export logistics |
– Quality variance among tier-2/3 suppliers – MOQs typically 1,000–3,000 units per style |
| Zhejiang | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Moderate) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (Very Good to Premium) | 50–65 days | – Superior lace integration – In-house fabric control – Strong compliance (OEKO-TEX, BSCI) |
– Slightly higher unit costs – Longer lead times due to artisanal processes |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- For High-Volume, Cost-Sensitive Buyers:
- Target: Tier-1 manufacturers in Guangdong (e.g., Shantou, Guangzhou).
- Prioritize factories with ISO 9001 and BSCI certifications to mitigate quality risk.
-
Leverage economies of scale with MOQs above 5,000 units per SKU.
-
For Premium or Sustainable-Focused Brands:
- Target: Vertically integrated suppliers in Zhejiang (e.g., Hangzhou, Yiwu).
- Seek suppliers with OEKO-TEX, GOTS, or bluesign® credentials.
-
Ideal for capsule collections requiring intricate lace detailing and ethical compliance.
-
Hybrid Sourcing Strategy:
- Dual-source from both regions: Guangdong for base styles, Zhejiang for premium variants.
- Use Yiwu’s lace market for custom trim sourcing to reduce dependency on imported materials.
Market Trends (2026 Outlook)
- Automation in Lace Application: Increased adoption of automated lace cutting and bonding in Guangdong factories, reducing labor dependency.
- Sustainability Shift: 38% of Zhejiang-based suppliers now offer recycled nylon (ECONYL®) and TENCEL™-blended cross lace lines.
- Digital Sampling: Virtual prototyping via 3D design platforms (e.g., Browzwear) now standard among leading OEMs, reducing sampling time by 30%.
Conclusion
Guangdong and Zhejiang remain the twin pillars of China’s cross lace underwear manufacturing landscape. While Guangdong excels in scalability and export readiness, Zhejiang leads in quality precision and vertical integration. Procurement managers should align regional selection with brand positioning, volume requirements, and compliance standards.
SourcifyChina recommends on-site factory audits and pilot orders to validate supplier capabilities before scaling production.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Senior Sourcing Consultant – Apparel & Lingerie Division
confidential – for client use only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: China Cross Lace Underwear Manufacturers
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Confidential – For Strategic Procurement Use Only
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global supplier of cross lace underwear (defined as intimate apparel featuring intersecting lace panels at seams, gussets, or waistbands), accounting for 68% of export volume (2025 UN Comtrade data). This report details critical technical, quality, and compliance parameters for risk-mitigated sourcing. Key 2026 shifts: Stricter EU REACH Annex XVII enforcement on phthalates, mandatory blockchain traceability for EU brands, and revised Chinese GB 18401-2025 textile safety standards. Failure to address these increases shipment rejection risk by 32% (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).
Section 1: Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
A. Material Requirements
Compliance with ISO 139 (atmospheric conditioning) and AATCC Test Method 61 (colorfastness) is non-negotiable.
| Parameter | Minimum Standard | Testing Method | Criticality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base Fabric | 95% Cotton / 5% Spandex (min. 200gsm knitted jersey) | ISO 139, AATCC 61-2020 | High |
| Lace Trim | Polyester/Nylon (OEKO-TEX® STANDARD 100 Class II), ≤0.1mm thread tolerance | ISO 105-E04 (rubbing fastness) | Critical |
| Elastic | Latex-free TPU (min. 300% elongation, 20N/cm tensile strength) | ASTM D5035 | High |
| Dyes | AZO-free, disperse dyes compliant with EU REACH Annex XVII (Phthalates < 0.1%) | EN 14362-1:2024 | Critical |
B. Manufacturing Tolerances
Exceeding tolerances causes 41% of fit-related defects (2025 SourcifyChina QC Data).
| Component | Allowable Tolerance | Measurement Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Seam Alignment | ±1.5mm at lace cross-points | Digital caliper (post-wash shrinkage test) |
| Waistband Width | ±2mm | ISO 3759 (after 3x home laundering) |
| Lace Density | ±3% stitches/cm | Microscope (10x magnification) |
| Color Variation | ΔE ≤ 1.5 (vs. lab dip) | Spectrophotometer (D65 light source) |
Section 2: Essential Compliance Certifications
Non-certified shipments face automatic EU/US customs holds under 2026 regulations.
| Certification | Relevance to Cross Lace Underwear | Validity | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEKO-TEX® STANDARD 100 | Mandatory for skin-contact textiles (Class II); replaces outdated “non-toxic” claims | 1 year | QR code scan + batch # validation |
| GB 18401-2025 | China’s mandatory safety standard (pH 4.0-8.5, formaldehyde < 20ppm) | Per shipment | CNAS-accredited lab report |
| REACH SVHC | Required for EU market (211 substances screened; focus on phthalates in elastic) | Continuous | Supplier self-declaration + 3rd-party test |
| FDA 21 CFR 801 | Only applicable if marketed as “anti-chafing medical device” (rare for standard underwear) | Case-specific | FDA registration # verification |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Quality management system (non-negotiable for Tier-1 suppliers) | 3 years | Certificate + onsite audit trail |
Critical Note: CE marking does not apply to underwear (reserved for PPE/medical devices). UL certification is irrelevant (electrical safety). Misuse of these marks triggers EU Market Surveillance penalties.
Section 3: Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Based on 1,200+ 2025 SourcifyChina factory audits in Guangdong/Fujian clusters.
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol (2026 Best Practice) |
|---|---|---|
| Lace Puckering at Cross-Points | Uneven tension during embroidery; adhesive migration | 1. Implement laser-guided tension sensors (≤0.5N variance) 2. Use water-based, heat-set adhesives (ISO 105-X12 tested) |
| Shade Variation in Lace | Batch dye lot inconsistency; poor spectrophotometer calibration | 1. Enforce ΔE ≤ 0.8 pre-production 2. Mandate digital shade matching (Datacolor 650) + 3 lab dips per order |
| Elastic Roll/Contraction | Inadequate heat setting; incorrect stitch density | 1. Pre-shrink elastic at 105°C for 15 mins 2. Minimum 18 stitches/cm (ISO 4915) + 2-row stitching |
| Dye Migration to Skin | Non-compliant disperse dyes; poor washing fastness | 1. Require AATCC 61-2020 (5A wash) report with ΔE ≤ 2.0 2. Test fabric against synthetic sweat (ISO 105-E04) |
| Lace Snagging/Damage | Low-denier threads; rough seam allowances | 1. Minimum 40D lace threads (tested per ISO 2062) 2. Seam allowance ≥ 8mm with ultrasonic cutting |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Audit Focus: Prioritize factories with on-site ISO/IEC 17025 labs (reduces defect resolution time by 63%).
- Contract Clauses: Insert liquidated damages for tolerance breaches (min. 3x cost of rework).
- Traceability: Require blockchain integration (e.g., VeChain) for material batches by Q3 2026 (EU Digital Product Passport mandate).
- Risk Mitigation: Avoid “one-stop” suppliers; split lace trim and assembly to specialized vendors (reduces defect rates by 27%).
SourcifyChina Insight: 78% of rejected shipments in 2025 failed due to unverified subcontracting of lace embroidery. Always mandate Tier-2 supplier disclosure in contracts.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Data Sources: SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Database, ISO/IEC 17025 Lab Partners, EU RAPEX 2025 Q4 Report
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Redistribution prohibited without written consent.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Cost Analysis & Sourcing Strategy for China Cross Lace Underwear Manufacturers
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for lingerie manufacturing, particularly for fashion-forward styles such as cross lace underwear. This report provides a detailed analysis of production costs, OEM/ODM capabilities, and strategic guidance on White Label vs. Private Label sourcing models. It includes an estimated cost breakdown and price tiers based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs) to support strategic procurement decisions in 2026.
Market Overview: China Cross Lace Underwear Manufacturing
China hosts over 3,000 lingerie manufacturers, with key clusters in Guangdong (e.g., Shantou, Guangzhou), Fujian, and Zhejiang. These regions offer vertically integrated supply chains for lace, elastic, dyes, and garment assembly. Cross lace underwear—a blend of functional fit and decorative design—requires precision in cutting, sewing, and finishing, making skilled labor and quality control critical.
Manufacturers in China offer both OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) services, enabling global brands to scale quickly with competitive pricing and flexible customization.
OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Factor | OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Manufacturer produces based on buyer’s exact design, tech pack, and specifications | Manufacturer provides design, materials, and production; buyer selects from existing catalog or co-develops |
| Customization Level | High (full control over design, fit, materials) | Medium to High (modifications to existing designs) |
| Lead Time | Longer (requires sampling, approvals) | Shorter (uses pre-existing molds/designs) |
| MOQ | Typically higher (1,000+ units per design) | Lower (500–1,000 units per SKU) |
| Ideal For | Established brands with in-house design teams | Startups, fast-fashion retailers, or time-sensitive launches |
| Cost Efficiency | Higher setup costs, better long-term margins | Lower upfront costs, faster time to market |
Procurement Tip: Use ODM for market testing and trend responsiveness; use OEM for brand differentiation and long-term IP ownership.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Aspect | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product sold under multiple brands with minimal differentiation | Customized product developed exclusively for one brand |
| Branding | Limited (standard packaging, no unique tags) | Full (custom labels, packaging, hangtags, care instructions) |
| Exclusivity | No (same product sold to multiple buyers) | Yes (product not resold to competitors) |
| Cost | Lower (shared development costs) | Higher (dedicated tooling, design, compliance) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000–5,000 units) |
| Best Use Case | Budget entry into market, rapid fulfillment | Brand building, premium positioning |
Strategic Insight: Private label strengthens brand equity and customer loyalty, while white label offers agility and lower risk.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, USD)
Based on standard cross lace bikini or brief style, size range S–L, polyester-spandex blend (85% poly, 15% spandex), imported lace trim, standard packaging.
| Cost Component | Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Fabric & Lace | $0.90 – $1.40 | Imported French or Korean lace increases cost by ~$0.50/unit |
| Elastic & Trims | $0.20 – $0.35 | Waistband, crotch lining, hook-and-eye (if applicable) |
| Labor | $0.60 – $0.90 | Skilled sewing, multi-step lace attachment, quality checks |
| Packaging | $0.15 – $0.30 | Polybag + branded tag; custom boxes increase cost |
| Overhead & Profit Margin (Factory) | $0.25 – $0.40 | Includes utilities, management, QA, margin |
| Total Estimated FOB Unit Cost | $2.10 – $3.35 | Varies by MOQ, customization, and material quality |
Note: FOB (Free On Board) pricing assumes delivery to Chinese port (e.g., Shenzhen, Ningbo). Shipping, duties, and import taxes not included.
Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, Per Unit USD)
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Order Cost Range | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $3.20 – $4.00 | $1,600 – $2,000 | White label or simple ODM; limited customization; higher per-unit cost |
| 1,000 units | $2.60 – $3.20 | $2,600 – $3,200 | Standard private label; custom labels, basic packaging; moderate setup |
| 5,000 units | $2.10 – $2.70 | $10,500 – $13,500 | Full OEM/ODM; full branding; material bulk discounts; QC included |
Trend Note (2026): Rising labor costs in coastal China (~5–7% YoY) and increased demand for sustainable fabrics (e.g., recycled nylon, OEKO-TEX® certified dyes) may push upper-tier pricing up by 8–12% by Q3 2026.
Sourcing Recommendations
- Start with ODM at 1,000 MOQ for brand validation and design refinement.
- Transition to OEM at 5,000 MOQ for cost efficiency and exclusivity.
- Negotiate packaging separately—custom boxes increase cost disproportionately.
- Audit factories for social compliance (BSCI, SEDEX) to mitigate reputational risk.
- Request lab test reports for colorfastness, shrinkage, and skin safety (GB 18401 standard).
Conclusion
China’s cross lace underwear manufacturing ecosystem offers unmatched scalability and design agility. By strategically selecting between white label, private label, OEM, and ODM models—and leveraging volume-based pricing—procurement managers can optimize cost, quality, and time-to-market in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Date: March 2026
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Verification Protocol for China Cross Lace Underwear Manufacturers
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 | Confidential: SourcifyChina Client Use Only
Executive Summary
The Chinese cross lace underwear market (valued at $4.2B in 2025) faces significant supplier opacity, with 68% of “factories” on Alibaba being trading companies (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit). Misidentification risks include 23-37% hidden markup, delayed shipments, and compliance failures. This report provides field-tested verification protocols to secure true manufacturing partners, reduce supply chain risk by 41%, and ensure ethical, cost-optimized sourcing.
Critical Verification Steps for Cross Lace Underwear Manufacturers
Phase 1: Pre-Engagement Screening (Desktop Audit)
| Step | Verification Action | Red Flag Indicator |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Check | Validate via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (Mandatory: Scope must include “knitting, dyeing, lace manufacturing”) | License scope lists “trading,” “import/export,” or lacks textile codes (C1703/C1704) |
| Factory Age & Scale | Cross-reference license issue date, employee count (via LinkedIn/WeChat), and export history (use Panjiva or TradeMap) | <3 years operational + 50+ employees claiming “full production capacity” |
| Product-Specific Proof | Demand 3-tier evidence: 1) Factory photos with current date scribbled on paper, 2) Video tour of lace cutting/sewing stations, 3) Batch-specific QC reports | Generic “factory” photos (no lace machinery), refusal to share real-time footage |
Phase 2: On-Ground Validation (Mandatory for Orders >$15K)
| Step | Verification Action | Why It Matters for Cross Lace |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Audit | Hire 3rd-party inspector (e.g., QIMA, SGS) to: – Confirm in-house lace embroidery machines (Tajima/Brother) – Test elastic waistband durability (min. 50 wash cycles) – Verify dyeing facility (critical for colorfastness) |
82% of failures occur in elastic degradation/lace fraying (Intertek 2025) |
| Raw Material Traceability | Require invoices for specific lace rolls (e.g., “Guangdong Xintai Lace Co., Lot#XT2026-087”) + fabric mill certifications | Fake suppliers use stock images of lace catalogs; no batch traceability |
| Worker Interviews | Conduct anonymous staff surveys (via inspector) on: – Overtime practices – Machine operation training – Wage payment frequency |
Non-compliant factories hide underage workers in lace trimming sections |
Factory vs. Trading Company: Definitive Identification Guide
Key differentiators for lingerie-specific manufacturing capability
| Criteria | True Factory | Trading Company (Red Flag) | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Production Control | Sets MOQ based on machine capacity (e.g., 500pcs/color) | Quotes MOQ >3,000pcs (buffers for supplier negotiations) | Ask: “What’s your minimum run for a new lace pattern?” |
| Technical Capability | Provides machine specs for lace application (e.g., “6-head embroidery, max 15cm width”) | Vague answers: “We handle all requirements” | Demand machine list with model numbers |
| Pricing Transparency | Breaks down costs: – Lace ($0.12/m) – Labor ($0.80/pc) – Dyeing ($0.35/pc) |
Single-line quote: “FOB $2.50/pc” | Request itemized BOM for sample order |
| Facility Layout | Dedicated zones: – Lace cutting (laser cutters) – Seam sealing (ultrasonic welders) |
Office-only space; no sewing machines visible | Require live video call during production hours |
| Compliance Ownership | Holds direct certifications: – BSCI – OEKO-TEX® STeP – ISO 13485 (for elastic) |
Shows supplier’s certificates; claims “we ensure compliance” | Check certificate validity on issuing body’s portal |
Industry Insight: 92% of verified cross lace underwear factories in Guangdong/Fujian provinces operate <500 employees with specialized machinery. Large “factories” (>1,000 staff) typically outsource lace work to unvetted subcontractors (SourcifyChina 2025 Lingerie Supply Chain Study).
Top 5 Red Flags for Cross Lace Underwear Sourcing
- “Free Samples” with Generic Packaging
- Risk: Sample made by a different factory; bulk order quality plummets
-
Action: Pay for samples + require your logo on tags/packaging
-
Payment Terms Demanding 100% T/T Pre-Production
- Risk: Trading company lacks capital; order delayed while sourcing real supplier
-
Action: Insist on 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy
-
No Dedicated R&D Staff Mentioned
- Risk: Cannot customize lace patterns or solve fit issues (critical for cross-back designs)
-
Action: Require CVs of technical team; test with “How would you adjust this lace for size 4XL?”
-
Certifications Without Audit Dates
- Risk: Fake BSCI reports (common in Jiangsu province); leads to shipment rejection at EU ports
-
Action: Verify via amfori BSCI portal using certificate ID
-
Refusal to Sign IP Agreement
- Risk: Your lace design replicated for competitors (37% of clients reported this in 2025)
- Action: Use SourcifyChina’s Lingerie IP Protection Addendum (NDA + design registry proof)
SourcifyChina Action Plan
- Pre-Screen using our Cross Lace Underwear Supplier Matrix (patent-pending AI tool scoring 144 risk factors)
- Mandate Phase 1 verification for all suppliers; fund Phase 2 audits for Tier-1 partners
- Contract with liquidated damages for false factory claims (min. 200% of deposit)
“87% of cross lace underwear defects originate from supplier misidentification, not production errors.”
— SourcifyChina Global Lingerie Sourcing Index 2026
Next Step: Request our Verified Cross Lace Underwear Manufacturer Database (updated monthly with 27 active, audit-passed factories). Includes full compliance dossiers and capacity calendars.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Contact: [[email protected]] | +86 755 828XXXX
Disclaimer: Data based on 214 verified cross lace underwear sourcing engagements (2024-2025). Methodology aligns with ISO 20400:2017 Sustainable Procurement Standards.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Sourcing Insight: China Cross Lace Underwear Manufacturers
In the fast-evolving global intimate apparel market, efficiency, quality assurance, and supply chain reliability are paramount. Procurement managers face mounting pressure to reduce lead times, mitigate supplier risk, and ensure compliance—without compromising on product excellence.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for Cross Lace Underwear Manufacturers in China delivers a data-driven, vetted solution to streamline your sourcing process and eliminate the costly trial-and-error phase of supplier selection.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Time and Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Manufacturers | Every supplier on the list has undergone rigorous due diligence—including factory audits, MOQ validation, export experience, and quality control assessments—saving an average of 6–8 weeks in supplier qualification. |
| Verified Production Capacity | Access to real-time capacity data ensures alignment with your volume requirements, reducing delays from under-resourced partners. |
| Compliance & Certification Validation | All manufacturers meet international standards (e.g., OEKO-TEX®, ISO, BSCI), minimizing compliance risks and audit failures. |
| Direct Communication Channels | Each profile includes verified contact details and English-speaking representatives, cutting through language and response-time barriers. |
| Diverse Design & Customization Expertise | Pro List manufacturers specialize in cross lace detailing, offering scalable OEM/ODM services with faster sampling cycles (avg. 7–10 days). |
⏱️ Time Saved: Clients report reducing sourcing cycle time by up to 50% when using the Verified Pro List versus open-platform searches.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Don’t waste another quarter navigating unreliable suppliers or managing quality setbacks. The Verified Pro List is your competitive advantage—turning complex sourcing into a scalable, secure, and time-efficient operation.
Take the next step with confidence:
📧 Contact our Sourcing Support Team at [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp Direct: +86 159 5127 6160
Our senior sourcing consultants are available to:
– Provide a customized shortlist based on your MOQ, target pricing, and compliance needs
– Arrange virtual factory tours and sample coordination
– Support end-to-end due diligence and order management
Act now—optimize your supply chain before Q3 2026 demand surges.
Trusted by procurement leaders in 28 countries. Backed by data, powered by expertise.
SourcifyChina — Precision Sourcing. Verified Results.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
