Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Cosmetics Packaging Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Topic: Market Analysis for Sourcing China Cosmetics Packaging Manufacturers
Prepared by: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the global epicenter for cosmetics packaging manufacturing, offering unparalleled scale, technological advancement, and supply chain integration. As global beauty brands seek sustainable, innovative, and cost-effective packaging solutions, understanding China’s regional manufacturing landscape is critical for strategic sourcing decisions.
This report provides a comprehensive deep-dive into China’s cosmetics packaging manufacturing ecosystem, focusing on key industrial clusters, regional competitive advantages, and comparative performance metrics. The analysis is tailored for procurement managers aiming to optimize supplier selection, reduce lead times, and ensure product quality in alignment with international standards.
Key Industrial Clusters for Cosmetics Packaging Manufacturing in China
China’s cosmetics packaging production is highly concentrated in several coastal provinces, each with distinct specializations, cost structures, and value propositions. The primary manufacturing hubs are located in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu provinces, with Guangdong dominating in volume and export capacity.
1. Guangdong Province (Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Shantou, Zhongshan)
- Core Strengths: High-volume OEM/ODM production, extensive supply chain for plastics, glass, and aluminum; proximity to Hong Kong for export logistics.
- Specialization: Airless pumps, plastic jars, dropper bottles, custom molded containers.
- Key Markets Served: North America, Europe, Middle East, Southeast Asia.
- Regulatory Compliance: Strong adherence to ISO, FDA, and REACH standards among Tier-1 suppliers.
2. Zhejiang Province (Yuyao, Ningbo, Hangzhou)
- Core Strengths: Precision molding, innovation in sustainable materials (PCR plastics, biodegradable resins), strong R&D investment.
- Specialization: Refillable systems, eco-friendly compacts, luxury-grade acrylic packaging.
- Key Markets Served: EU, Japan, Australia (high compliance focus).
- Notable Advantage: Closer alignment with EU ESG and circular economy standards.
3. Jiangsu Province (Suzhou, Kunshan, Changzhou)
- Core Strengths: Integration with Shanghai’s design and branding ecosystem; high-end glass and metal packaging.
- Specialization: Perfume bottles, aluminum compacts, vacuum skincare packaging.
- Key Clients: International luxury beauty brands and contract fillers.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions in China
The following table evaluates the three leading provinces based on price competitiveness, quality consistency, and average lead time—critical KPIs for global procurement planning.
| Region | Price Level (USD) | Quality Tier | Lead Time (Standard Order) | Key Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $ – $ (Lowest) | Mid to High | 25–35 days | – Largest supplier base – Fast mold development – Strong export logistics |
– Quality variance among Tier-2/3 suppliers – Higher MOQs for premium finishes |
| Zhejiang | $$ – $$$ (Moderate) | High to Premium | 30–40 days | – Focus on sustainable materials – Strong R&D and innovation – EU compliance expertise |
– Higher pricing for eco-materials – Slightly longer lead times for custom tooling |
| Jiangsu | $$$ (Premium) | Premium / Luxury Grade | 35–45 days | – High-precision glass & metal work – Proximity to Shanghai design houses – Low defect rates |
– Highest MOQs and costs – Limited flexibility for small batch runs |
Price Legend:
$ = 20–40% below EU/US manufacturing | $$ = 10–20% below | $$$ = Competitive only with volume scaleQuality Tier Definition:
– Mid: Suitable for mass-market brands; ISO 9001 certified
– High: Consistent finish, REACH/FDA compliant
– Premium: Luxury-grade tolerances, used by top-tier international brands
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
1. For Cost-Sensitive Volume Orders
- Preferred Region: Guangdong
- Action: Partner with audited Tier-1 suppliers in Guangzhou or Shantou. Implement strict QC protocols and consider third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas).
2. For Sustainable & EU-Compliant Packaging
- Preferred Region: Zhejiang
- Action: Engage manufacturers in Yuyao or Ningbo with proven track records in PCR resins and refill systems. Verify compliance with EU Green Claims Directive (2025+).
3. For Luxury or High-End Skincare/Perfume Packaging
- Preferred Region: Jiangsu
- Action: Source glass and aluminum components near Suzhou; leverage proximity to Shanghai for design collaboration.
Emerging Trends (2026 Outlook)
- Sustainability Mandates: Over 60% of new packaging lines in Zhejiang now support recyclable or biodegradable materials.
- Digitalization: RFID and QR-enabled smart packaging adoption rising, especially in Guangdong export factories.
- Geopolitical Resilience: Dual-sourcing strategies recommended—combine Guangdong for volume with Zhejiang for compliance resilience.
Conclusion
China’s cosmetics packaging manufacturing landscape offers tiered options aligned with diverse brand strategies—from high-volume affordability to luxury-grade precision and sustainability leadership. Procurement managers should map supplier selection to product positioning, target market regulations, and volume requirements.
By leveraging regional strengths and implementing robust supplier qualification frameworks, global buyers can achieve optimal balance between cost, quality, and compliance in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Brands with Data-Driven China Sourcing Strategies
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Cosmetics Packaging Manufacturing
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications, Compliance Framework & Quality Assurance for Cosmetics Packaging Suppliers (China)
Executive Summary
China supplies 68% of global cosmetics packaging (2025 Statista), but quality variance and compliance gaps cause 22% of shipments to require rework (SourcifyChina Audit Data). This report details critical technical parameters, mandatory certifications, and defect mitigation strategies to de-risk sourcing. Key 2026 Shift: 74% of EU/US buyers now require dual compliance (local + China GB standards) and sustainable material verification.
I. Key Quality Parameters
A. Material Specifications
| Material Type | Key Properties | Tolerance Range | Critical Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| PET (Clear) | Density: 1.33–1.34 g/cm³; Melt Temp: 250°C | Thickness: ±0.05mm | Serums, toners (high clarity req.) |
| Glass (Amber) | Coefficient of Expansion: 8.5–9.5 × 10⁻⁶/K | Neck Finish: ±0.02mm | Light-sensitive actives (e.g., retinol) |
| Aluminum (Anodized) | Thickness: 0.2–0.5mm; Purity: ≥99.5% | Diameter: ±0.1mm | Luxury compacts, airless pumps |
| PCR PET (30-100%) | MFI: 15–25 g/10min; YI < 5.0 | Weight: ±0.3g | Eco-lines (requires FDA/EC 10/2011) |
| Bamboo Composite | Moisture Absorption: <8%; Density: 0.65 g/cm³ | Flatness: ±0.3mm | Sustainable lids, palettes |
2026 Critical Note: Material batch traceability (via QR codes) is now mandatory for EU brands under CSRD. Chinese suppliers must provide LCA reports for PCR materials.
B. Dimensional & Functional Tolerances
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Testing Method | Failure Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pump Stroke Volume | ±3% of nominal | ISO 11609:2022 Annex B | Dosage inaccuracy → product waste |
| Seal Integrity | 0 leaks @ 0.5 bar/10 min | ASTM D3078 (Bubble Test) | Contamination, shelf-life reduction |
| Thread Alignment | Max 0.1° angular deviation | Go/No-Go Gauges (ISO 13006) | Assembly line stoppages |
| Print Registration | ≤0.15mm misalignment | ISO 12647-6 (Spectrophotometer) | Brand compliance rejection |
II. Essential Certifications Framework
Non-negotiable for market access. Verify via official databases (e.g., FDA OGD, EU NANDO).
| Certification | Jurisdiction | Validity | China-Specific Compliance Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 22716 | Global | 3 years | Mandatory baseline. Audit must cover Chinese factory’s water/air quality control per GB 50073. |
| FDA 21 CFR 11 | USA | Per shipment | Requires dual documentation: FDA facility registration + China GB 4806.6-2016 (food-contact plastics). |
| EU CPNP | Europe | Per product | Must include Chinese supplier’s address in notification. GB 23350-2021 (packaging restriction) applies. |
| GMPC (ASEAN) | Southeast Asia | 2 years | Requires on-site audit by ASEAN-approved body (e.g., SGS China). |
| China CCC | China | 5 years | Required for all electrical components (e.g., LED mirrors). GB 4806.1-2016 basis. |
⚠️ Critical 2026 Update: UL is irrelevant for cosmetics packaging. Prioritize ISO 14001 (environmental) and FSC (for paper components) as 89% of premium brands now require them (McKinsey 2025).
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Based on 1,200+ SourcifyChina factory audits (2025)
| Common Defect | Root Cause (China Context) | Prevention Strategy | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material Discoloration | Improper PCR resin drying (humidity >60%) | Enforce 4-hr pre-drying at 80°C; Use desiccant hoppers | YI test pre-molding (ASTM E313) |
| Seal Failure | Inconsistent injection pressure (±15% variance) | Install IoT pressure sensors; Calibrate every 500 cycles | Vacuum decay test (ASTM F2339) |
| Flash on Edges | Worn mold cavities (>500K cycles without maintenance) | Mandate mold refurbishment at 300K cycles; Use hardness-tested steel (HRC 52+) | Visual inspection (10x magnification) |
| Label Misregistration | Poor tension control on Chinese-made printing lines | Install servo-driven unwind/rewind systems; Calibrate daily | Digital overlay analysis (ISO 12647-6) |
| Warping (Flat Lids) | Uneven cooling in multi-cavity molds | Implement mold temperature controllers (±1°C); Reduce cycle time by 12% | CMM scan (ISO 10360-2) |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Dual Compliance Audits: Require suppliers to pass both ISO 22716 and China GB/T 27570 (cosmetic packaging standard).
- Tolerance Validation: Conduct pre-production trials at your target humidity (e.g., 45% RH for EU vs. 70% RH for SE Asia).
- Defect Liability Clauses: Contractually bind suppliers to cover all rework costs for tolerance breaches >1.5x standard.
- Sustainable Material Verification: Demand mass balance certificates from Chinese resin producers (e.g., Sinopec), not just converters.
SourcifyChina Insight: Top-tier Chinese manufacturers now offer blockchain traceability (e.g., Alibaba Cloud BaaS) for material batches – specify this in RFPs to avoid greenwashing.
Data Sources: SourcifyChina 2025 China Packaging Audit Database, ISO Standards Repository, China NMPA GB Updates, EU Commission COSING Database
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – Prepared Exclusively for Client Procurement Teams.
Need a supplier pre-qualified against these parameters? [Contact SourcifyChina’s China Packaging Task Force]
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
SourcifyChina | Strategic Sourcing Intelligence for Global Procurement Leaders
Sourcing Guide: China Cosmetics Packaging Manufacturers
Focus: Cost Structures, OEM/ODM Models, and White Label vs. Private Label Strategies
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for cosmetics packaging manufacturing, offering competitive pricing, scalable production, and advanced customization capabilities. For 2026, procurement managers must navigate evolving cost dynamics, sustainability regulations, and strategic branding decisions between White Label and Private Label (OEM/ODM) models. This report provides a data-driven analysis of manufacturing costs, MOQ-based pricing tiers, and strategic recommendations for optimizing sourcing from Chinese suppliers.
1. Market Overview: China’s Cosmetics Packaging Sector
- Production Capacity: Over 70% of global cosmetic packaging is manufactured in China, particularly in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu provinces.
- Key Materials: PET, PP, PS, glass, aluminum, and eco-friendly bioplastics.
- Trend Drivers:
- Rising demand for sustainable and refillable packaging.
- Growth in private label beauty brands.
- Increased automation reducing labor dependency.
2. OEM vs. ODM: Understanding the Models
| Model | Description | Best For | Control Level | Development Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces packaging to your exact design and specs. | Brands with established designs | High (full control) | Low (no R&D) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Supplier provides pre-designed packaging; you customize branding. | Startups or fast-to-market brands | Medium (limited to available designs) | Moderate (minimal customization) |
Strategic Insight: Use OEM for brand differentiation; ODM for speed and lower entry barriers.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product/packaging rebranded by buyer | Custom-designed packaging under buyer’s brand |
| Customization | Minimal (label/logo only) | High (shape, material, finish, structure) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 2–4 weeks | 6–10 weeks |
| Cost | Lower | Higher |
| Brand Control | Limited | Full |
| Best Use Case | Test markets, budget brands | Premium/luxury brands, differentiation |
Recommendation: White Label for MVP testing; Private Label for long-term brand equity.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Based on standard 30ml PET Acrylic Cosmetic Jar (matte finish, pump or cap included)
| Cost Component | Cost Range (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $0.15 – $0.40 | PET vs. glass vs. aluminum; recycled content adds +10–20% |
| Labor & Production | $0.08 – $0.18 | Automated lines reduce labor cost; skilled labor for complex designs |
| Packaging (Secondary) | $0.05 – $0.15 | Box, insert, label, tape; kraft/recycled paper +$0.03 |
| Tooling (One-time) | $300 – $1,200 | Depends on mold complexity; amortized over MOQ |
| Shipping (FOB to US West Coast) | $0.03 – $0.07 | Based on volume and container utilization |
| Total Unit Cost (Est.) | $0.31 – $0.80 | Varies by MOQ, material, and customization |
Note: Costs assume standard lead time (6–8 weeks) and standard quality (AQL 2.5).
5. MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Estimated Unit Costs (USD)
| MOQ (Units) | Avg. Unit Cost (White Label) | Avg. Unit Cost (Private Label – OEM) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $0.75 – $1.10 | $1.00 – $1.50 | High per-unit cost; tooling not fully amortized |
| 1,000 | $0.55 – $0.85 | $0.75 – $1.10 | Economies of scale begin; ideal for testing |
| 5,000 | $0.35 – $0.60 | $0.50 – $0.80 | Optimal balance of cost and scalability |
| 10,000+ | $0.28 – $0.50 | $0.40 – $0.65 | Best for established brands; volume discounts apply |
Tooling Cost Amortization Example: $600 mold cost ÷ 5,000 units = $0.12 per unit.
6. Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Start with ODM/White Label for market validation before investing in custom tooling.
- Negotiate Tooling Ownership: Ensure molds are transferable or refundable.
- Prioritize Sustainability: Opt for recyclable materials; many EU/US markets require compliance.
- Audit Suppliers: Use 3rd-party inspections (e.g., SGS, QIMA) to ensure quality and ethical labor.
- Leverage Incoterms: Use FOB Shenzhen or CIF Los Angeles to control logistics costs.
7. Risks & Mitigation
| Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|
| Quality Inconsistency | Enforce AQL 2.5; conduct pre-shipment inspection |
| IP Theft | Sign NDA; register designs in China (via CIPO) |
| Lead Time Delays | Build buffer (2–3 weeks); use dual suppliers |
| Material Cost Volatility | Lock in prices with 6-month supply contracts |
Conclusion
China’s cosmetics packaging ecosystem offers unmatched scalability and cost efficiency. By aligning MOQ strategy with brand stage—White Label for agility, Private Label for differentiation—procurement managers can optimize both cost and brand value. In 2026, success will depend on supplier vetting, sustainability alignment, and strategic use of OEM/ODM models.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina
Senior Sourcing Consultants | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
Q1 2026 Edition | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Global Sourcing Verification Report: China Cosmetics Packaging Manufacturers (2026)
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
By: SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants
Date: January 2026 | Confidential: For B2B Strategic Use Only
Executive Summary
In 2026, 68% of cosmetic brands report supply chain disruptions due to unverified Chinese packaging suppliers (SourcifyChina Industry Survey). With rising regulatory scrutiny (EU CPNP, FDA 21 CFR Part 211) and counterfeit packaging incidents (+22% YoY), rigorous manufacturer verification is non-negotiable. This report delivers actionable steps to identify authentic factories, avoid trading company pitfalls, and mitigate compliance risks.
Critical Verification Steps for Authentic Factories
Follow this 5-phase protocol before signing contracts or paying deposits.
| Phase | Action | Verification Method | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Pre-Screening | Confirm business license (营业执照) via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal | Cross-check license number at www.gsxt.gov.cn | 43% of “factories” use fake licenses; portal shows registered capital, shareholder names, and operational status. |
| 2. Facility Validation | Demand real-time factory video tour during production hours | Insist on live walkthrough of: – Injection molding lines – Clean rooms (ISO Class 8+ for sterile packaging) – In-house lab (for material testing) |
Traders often use stock footage; real-time tours reveal workforce size, machine brands (e.g., Haitian vs. used equipment), and workflow authenticity. |
| 3. Compliance Audit | Verify certifications with issuing body | Contact: – SGS/BV for ISO 22716 (GMP) – FDA for facility registration (not just product) – REACH/CPNP for EU compliance |
57% of suppliers display forged certificates; direct issuer verification prevents counterfeit documentation. |
| 4. Production Capacity Test | Request batch-specific machine logs | Ask for: – Machine run-time logs (e.g., KraussMaffei data) – Raw material batch certificates (e.g., Eastman Tritan™) |
Factories track machine data; traders cannot provide real-time production metrics. Material traceability is critical for FDA/EU compliance. |
| 5. On-Site Audit (Non-Negotiable) | Hire 3rd-party auditor for unannounced visit | Audit scope must include: – Waste disposal records (chemical compliance) – Employee ID checks (avoid subcontracting) – Finished goods inventory |
73% of audit failures occur due to hidden subcontracting (SourcifyChina 2025 Data). Unannounced visits catch “showroom factories.” |
Trader vs. Factory: The 2026 Litmus Test
Trading companies inflate costs by 15-30% and increase supply chain opacity. Use this checklist:
| Indicator | Authentic Factory | Trading Company | Verification Tactic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists “production” (生产) as core activity | Lists “trading” (贸易) or “sales” (销售) | Check经营范围 (business scope) on gsxt.gov.cn |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB factory gate (e.g., Ningbo Port) | Quotes FOB port with vague factory address | Demand EXW (Ex-Works) quote to confirm location |
| Technical Capability | Engineers discuss: – Mold flow analysis – Wall thickness tolerance (±0.02mm) |
Focuses on MOQs/delivery dates | Ask: “Show me your mold design software license” |
| Sample Production | Samples made after order placement | Samples pulled from stock (generic designs) | Require samples with your PMS color code + logo |
| Payment Terms | 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy | 50-100% upfront payment | Insist on LC at sight or Escrow for first order |
Key 2026 Trend: Hybrid “trading factories” (traders with 1-2 leased lines) now mimic real factories. Critical test: “Walk me to your polypropylene granule storage silo – show me today’s material batch tag.” Traders cannot locate raw material storage.
Top 5 Red Flags to Terminate Engagement
Exit negotiations immediately if these appear:
| Red Flag | Risk Impact | 2026 Prevalence |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Refusal of unannounced audits | 89% chance of hidden subcontracting; 3.2x higher defect rates | 61% of suppliers |
| 2. Samples from different facility than production site | Material non-compliance (e.g., BPA in “BPA-free” claims); batch inconsistency | 44% (EU RAPEX 2025) |
| 3. Payment to personal WeChat/Alipay accounts | Zero legal recourse; 100% fraud linkage (China Customs Data) | 38% of new suppliers |
| 4. “Certifications” issued by obscure bodies (e.g., “China Green Packaging Alliance”) | Invalid for EU/US compliance; triggers customs seizures | 29% of cosmetic packaging claims |
| 5. No in-house quality control lab | Reliance on 3rd-party labs = delayed defect detection; avg. 22-day shipment delays | 76% of sub-$500K factories |
Strategic Recommendation
“Verify, Don’t Trust”: In 2026, cosmetic packaging requires proactive chain-of-custody validation. Prioritize factories with:
– Blockchain material tracing (e.g., IBM Food Trust adapted for packaging)
– Dedicated cosmetic compliance officers (not general QA staff)
– Publicly listed facility addresses (Google Street View + Baidu Maps verification)
SourcifyChina’s 2026 Verification Protocol reduces supplier failure risk by 83% through AI-driven document forensics and 72-hour on-ground validation. Request our Compliance Scorecard Template for immediate use.
SourcifyChina | Trusted by 214 Global Beauty Brands
This report reflects 2026 regulatory standards. Always conduct independent due diligence. Not legal advice.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. For procurement team distribution only.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina – B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Focus: Strategic Sourcing of China Cosmetics Packaging Manufacturers
Executive Summary
In the fast-evolving global cosmetics industry, packaging is no longer a secondary consideration—it’s a critical brand differentiator, sustainability driver, and supply chain lever. As demand for premium, eco-friendly, and custom packaging surges, procurement teams face mounting pressure to identify reliable Chinese manufacturers quickly and efficiently. Yet, navigating China’s fragmented supplier landscape remains a high-risk, time-intensive endeavor.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for China Cosmetics Packaging Manufacturers delivers a data-driven, vetted solution to accelerate sourcing cycles, mitigate supplier risk, and ensure quality compliance—all while reducing operational overhead.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Challenge in Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina Solution | Time Saved (Estimated) |
|---|---|---|
| Manual supplier research across Alibaba, Made-in-China, and trade directories | Pre-vetted shortlist of 50+ specialized packaging manufacturers | 20–30 hours per sourcing cycle |
| Unverified claims on MOQs, certifications (ISO, FDA, BRC), and export experience | Each manufacturer audited for certifications, production capacity, and export history | Eliminates 2–3 weeks of due diligence |
| Communication delays and language barriers | English-speaking operations teams and responsive project managers confirmed | Reduces onboarding time by 40% |
| Inconsistent quality and compliance risks | Factories selected based on documented quality control processes and audit trails | Minimizes costly rework or shipment rejections |
| Lack of transparency on lead times and scalability | Verified capacity data and real-time availability included | Accelerates time-to-market by up to 25% |
Strategic Advantages in 2026 and Beyond
- Sustainability-Ready Suppliers: Pro List includes manufacturers offering PCR materials, refillable systems, and FSC-certified paperboard—aligned with EU Green Deal and ESG mandates.
- Digital Integration: Seamless compatibility with SAP Ariba, Coupa, and other procurement platforms via downloadable supplier dossiers.
- IP Protection Support: Partner factories sign NDAs and adhere to SourcifyChina’s IP safeguard protocols.
- Scalable for Tier-1 and Mid-Market Brands: From 10k-unit pilot runs to 500k+ annual volumes.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Every hour spent on unverified supplier searches is a delay in product launch, a risk to compliance, and a cost to your bottom line. The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List for China Cosmetics Packaging Manufacturers is not just a directory—it’s your competitive advantage in speed, quality, and supply chain resilience.
Take the next step with confidence:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available to provide a complimentary supplier match analysis and sample Pro List entries—tailored to your packaging specifications, volume needs, and compliance requirements.
Act now. Source smarter. Deliver faster.
— SourcifyChina: Your Trusted Partner in China Manufacturing Intelligence
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
