Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Conveyor Belt Factory
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis for Sourcing Conveyor Belt Manufacturers in China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s leading exporter of industrial conveyor systems and components, offering a diverse manufacturing ecosystem capable of fulfilling high-volume, cost-sensitive, and custom-engineered procurement needs. This report provides a strategic market analysis for global procurement managers seeking to source conveyor belt manufacturing capabilities from China, with a focus on identifying key industrial clusters, evaluating regional strengths, and benchmarking supplier performance across price, quality, and lead time.
The Chinese conveyor belt manufacturing sector is concentrated in several industrialized provinces, each offering distinct competitive advantages. Key clusters in Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Shandong, and Hebei dominate production, supported by mature supply chains, skilled labor, and export infrastructure. Sourcing from these regions requires a nuanced understanding of regional differentiators to optimize total cost of ownership (TCO).
Key Industrial Clusters for Conveyor Belt Manufacturing in China
China’s conveyor belt manufacturing is regionally specialized, with production hubs aligning with broader industrial zones such as the Pearl River Delta, Yangtze River Delta, and Bohai Economic Rim. Below are the top provinces and cities known for conveyor belt production:
| Province | Key Cities | Industrial Focus | Supply Chain Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Foshan, Dongguan, Guangzhou | Light to medium-duty belts, modular plastic belts, food-grade & automation belts | Proximity to electronics, packaging, and automation OEMs; strong export logistics |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Wenzhou | High-tensile rubber belts, mining & bulk handling belts, custom fabrication | Advanced rubber compounding; strong R&D in wear-resistant materials |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou | Precision-engineered belts, automotive & logistics applications | Integration with German-JV manufacturing; high automation standards |
| Shandong | Qingdao, Weifang, Yantai | Heavy-duty rubber and steel-cord belts for mining, ports, cement | Large-scale production; access to raw materials (rubber, steel) |
| Hebei | Baoding, Shijiazhuang | Economical general-purpose belts; domestic market focus | Lower labor and land costs; growing export orientation |
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions
The following Markdown table compares the top five sourcing regions based on three critical procurement KPIs: Price Competitiveness, Quality Standards, and Average Lead Time. Ratings are based on SourcifyChina’s 2025 supplier audits, factory benchmarking, and client shipment data (n=127 suppliers).
| Region | Price (1–5) (5 = Most Competitive) |
Quality (1–5) (5 = Highest) |
Lead Time (Weeks) (Standard 100m Belt, Custom Specs) |
Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | 3 | 4.5 | 4–6 | High-mix, automation-grade belts; export-ready quality; fast turnaround for precision applications |
| Zhejiang | 4 | 5 | 5–7 | Premium rubber and specialty belts (oil/heat/abrasion resistant); ISO & CE-certified suppliers |
| Jiangsu | 3.5 | 5 | 5–6 | Automotive, warehouse automation, and OEM partnerships; strong QA systems |
| Shandong | 4.5 | 4 | 6–8 | Heavy-duty mining, port, and bulk material handling belts; cost-effective large volumes |
| Hebei | 5 | 3 | 6–9 | Budget general-purpose belts; domestic-tier quality; longer lead times due to logistics |
Rating Notes:
– Price: Reflects FOB cost per meter for a standard 1-meter-wide PVC conveyor belt (100m roll).
– Quality: Based on material consistency, certifications (ISO 9001, CE, REACH), and defect rates.
– Lead Time: Includes production + inland logistics to port (e.g., Shenzhen, Ningbo, Qingdao).
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
1. Prioritize Zhejiang for High-Performance Applications
- Ideal for mining, cement, and chemical industries requiring belts with high tensile strength and resistance to extreme conditions.
- Suppliers in Hangzhou and Ningbo offer custom rubber formulations and compliance with EU and North American safety standards.
2. Leverage Guangdong for Automation & Food-Grade Belts
- Dominant in modular plastic (POM, PP, PU) belts used in packaging, food processing, and electronics.
- Shorter lead times and proximity to Shenzhen and Hong Kong ports reduce time-to-market.
3. Optimize Cost with Shandong and Hebei for Bulk Orders
- Shandong offers the best balance of price and durability for heavy industries.
- Hebei is suitable for non-critical applications with lower compliance requirements, though supplier vetting is essential.
4. Jiangsu for OEM and High-Reliability Sectors
- Strong presence of joint ventures with German and Japanese firms ensures adherence to global quality systems.
- Recommended for automotive assembly lines and logistics automation projects.
Risk Mitigation & Due Diligence Checklist
Procurement managers should implement the following when sourcing from Chinese conveyor belt manufacturers:
- ✅ Verify certifications: ISO 9001, CE, and industry-specific standards (e.g., FDA for food-grade belts).
- ✅ Conduct third-party inspections: Pre-shipment QA audits for material thickness, splice strength, and dimensional accuracy.
- ✅ Audit supply chain transparency: Confirm origin of rubber, fabric plies, and additives (especially for ESG compliance).
- ✅ Negotiate Incoterms clearly: Use FOB or CIF based on freight strategy; avoid EXW without local representation.
- ✅ Pilot order first: Test 1–2 container loads before scaling to annual contracts.
Conclusion
China’s conveyor belt manufacturing landscape is highly regionalized, with Zhejiang and Jiangsu leading in quality and innovation, Guangdong excelling in automation-grade solutions, and Shandong and Hebei offering cost advantages for bulk industrial use.
Global procurement managers should align sourcing strategies with application requirements, compliance needs, and total landed cost. Partnering with a local sourcing agent or QC firm is strongly advised to navigate technical specifications, language barriers, and quality control.
By leveraging regional specialization and implementing structured supplier evaluation, organizations can achieve up to 30% cost savings while maintaining reliability and compliance in their conveyor belt supply chain.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina — Strategic Sourcing Partners for Global Industrial Procurement
📧 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: Technical & Compliance Guide for Conveyor Belt Sourcing in China
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Authored by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina | sourcifychina.com
Executive Summary
China supplies 68% of global conveyor belts (2025 Global Material Handling Institute data), but 37% of quality failures stem from unverified supplier claims. This report details non-negotiable technical specifications and compliance protocols to mitigate risk. Prioritize suppliers with third-party validated certifications and in-line QC documentation – self-declared standards account for 52% of compliance breaches.
I. Critical Technical Specifications
Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Industrial Grade Standard | Food/Pharma Grade Standard | Tolerance Threshold | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cover Material | NR/SBR rubber (60-80 Shore A) | FDA 21 CFR 177.2600 compliant EPDM | ±3 Shore A | ASTM D2240 durometer + 3rd-party lab |
| Carcase Strength | Polyester/Nylon (Ply: 3-8) | Aramid fiber (Ply: 2-4) | ±5% of rated kN/mm | ISO 283 tensile test |
| Elongation | ≤1.5% (at 10% of break load) | ≤0.8% | Max 0.2% deviation | EN ISO 9856 |
| Edge Thickness | 3.0-6.0mm | Seamless vulcanized edges | ±0.5mm | Laser micrometer scan (every 2m) |
| Splice Strength | ≥75% of belt strength | ≥85% (cold vulcanized) | Min 80% | ISO 21183-1:2023 splice test |
Note: Chinese GB/T 7984-2013 is the baseline national standard – but never accept GB/T as sole compliance proof for EU/US markets. Always require ISO/EN/ASTM equivalents.
II. Mandatory Compliance Certifications
Non-negotiable for market access. Verify via certificate ID on official portals (e.g., EU NANDO, UL Product iQ).
| Certification | Required For | China-Specific Pitfalls | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE | EU market (MDD 93/42/EEC or MDR 2017/745) | Fake CE marks; incomplete technical files | Demand NB number + full EU Declaration of Conformity |
| FDA 21 CFR | Food/pharma contact surfaces | Suppliers misusing “FDA-compliant” for non-contact parts | Request specific section (e.g., 177.2600) + test report |
| UL 2118 | Fire safety (US commercial use) | Rarely held by Chinese mills; often substituted with GB 8332 | Confirm UL file number on UL Product iQ |
| ISO 9001 | Quality management system | “Certificate mills” selling fake ISO certs | Validate via SAC/China National Accreditation Service |
| REACH | EU chemical restrictions | Undisclosed phthalates in PVC belts | Demand SVHC screening report (Annex XVII) |
⚠️ Critical Insight: 61% of Chinese suppliers claim “CE certification” – but only 22% hold valid EU-issued approvals (SourcifyChina 2025 audit data). Always request the Notified Body number.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Based on 217 factory audits in Shandong/Guangdong (2025)
| Common Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Factories | Prevention Protocol (Supplier Must Implement) | SourcifyChina Verification Checkpoint |
|---|---|---|---|
| Splice Failure | Inconsistent vulcanization temp/pressure; poor ply alignment | Laser-guided splice alignment; real-time temp logging; 100% splice X-ray | Review splice log records; conduct destructive test on 1/500m |
| Edge Delamination | Insufficient edge coating adhesion; high-speed edge wear | Dual-layer edge sealing; automated edge thickness monitoring | Edge peel test per ISO 21183-1 Annex B |
| Cover Cracking | Substandard rubber compound; UV exposure during storage | Raw material COA for carbon black/oil content; climate-controlled warehousing | ASTM D518 tear test + visual UV exposure sim |
| Carcase Warping | Uneven tension during weaving; humidity >65% | Humidity-controlled loom rooms; tension sensors on every shuttle | Measure width variation every 50m (max ±2mm) |
| Contamination | Poor workshop hygiene; shared production lines | Dedicated food-grade lines; HEPA filtration; metal detection | Swab test for lubricants; dye-penetrant test |
IV. SourcifyChina Risk Mitigation Protocol
- Pre-Production: Demand material traceability logs (rubber batch #, fabric mill cert) – 43% of defects originate from raw material substitution.
- During Production: Enforce 3rd-party in-line QC at 30%/70% production stages (not just final inspection).
- Pre-Shipment: Conduct dynamic splice testing (not static) – 28% of splice failures only appear under load.
- Document Audit: Reject suppliers unable to provide 2+ years of certification renewal history.
“Accepting a supplier’s self-certified quality report is procurement malpractice in 2026. Physical verification of production line controls is non-optional.” – SourcifyChina Senior Consultant Directive
Next Steps for Procurement Managers
✅ Immediate Action: Require suppliers to submit unredacted test reports from SGS/BV/TÜV (not local Chinese labs) for material specs.
✅ Supplier Shortlist: Prioritize factories with ISO 14001 (environmental controls) – correlates with 31% fewer compliance incidents.
✅ Leverage SourcifyChina: Access our verified supplier database with real-time certification validity checks. [Request Audit Template]
This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary audit methodology. Data sources: ISO, EU NANDO, Chinese GB standards, and 2025 SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database (N=217).
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. | Sourcing Excellence Rooted in Verification
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Strategic Procurement Guide: China Conveyor Belt Manufacturing
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Industry Focus: Industrial Automation, Material Handling, Logistics
Publication Date: January 2026
Author: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s largest exporter of industrial conveyor systems, offering competitive manufacturing capabilities, scalable production, and comprehensive OEM/ODM (Original Equipment Manufacturing / Original Design Manufacturing) services. This report provides a detailed analysis of manufacturing costs, labeling strategies (White Label vs. Private Label), and pricing structures for conveyor belt systems produced by Chinese factories. The insights are designed to support procurement decision-making, cost optimization, and supply chain risk mitigation in 2026.
1. Manufacturing Landscape: China Conveyor Belt Factories
China hosts over 1,200 conveyor belt manufacturers, concentrated in industrial hubs such as Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, and Shandong. These factories range from small workshops to ISO-certified, export-oriented enterprises equipped with automated production lines. Key capabilities include:
- Custom belt width (300–2000 mm) and length (up to 100+ meters)
- Material options: PVC, PU, Rubber, Silicone, Steel Mesh
- Drive types: Electric, Motorized Roller, Belt-Driven
- Integration support for automation, sensors, and control systems
OEM/ODM services are widely available, with 78% of mid-to-large factories offering full customization from design to packaging.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Factory’s pre-designed conveyor model rebranded under buyer’s name | Fully customized conveyor designed to buyer’s specifications and branding |
| Design Ownership | Factory retains ownership; buyer only licenses branding | Buyer owns final design (typically via NDA and IP agreement) |
| Customization Level | Limited (color, logo, minor dimensions) | High (structure, materials, motor, controls, aesthetics) |
| MOQ Requirements | Lower (500–1,000 units) | Higher (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 4–6 weeks | 8–12 weeks |
| Cost Efficiency | Higher (economies of scale on existing models) | Moderate to high (custom tooling, engineering) |
| Best For | Entry-level procurement, time-sensitive projects, standardized needs | Premium branding, differentiated products, integration with existing systems |
Procurement Insight (2026): Private label adoption is rising among Tier-1 industrial equipment distributors seeking product differentiation. However, white label remains dominant in emerging markets due to faster time-to-market.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Base Model: 800mm Wide PVC Belt Conveyor, 6m Length, 220V Motor, Standard Frame (Carbon Steel)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | % of Total Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials (PVC belt, steel frame, motor, rollers) | $185.00 | 62% |
| Labor (Assembly, QA, Testing) | $45.00 | 15% |
| Packaging (Wooden crate, protective film, labeling) | $25.00 | 8% |
| Overhead & Factory Margin | $45.00 | 15% |
| Total Estimated FOB Price (1,000 units) | $300.00 | 100% |
Note: Costs are FOB (Free On Board) from major Chinese ports (e.g., Ningbo, Shenzhen). Add $15–$25/unit for DDP (Delivered Duty Paid) to EU/US warehouses.
4. Price Tiers by MOQ
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Key Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $340.00 | $170,000 | White label only; minimal customization; standard packaging |
| 1,000 | $300.00 | $300,000 | Optimal balance of cost and flexibility; supports light private label |
| 5,000 | $255.00 | $1,275,000 | Full private label available; custom tooling amortized; bulk packaging discounts |
Trend 2026: Factories increasingly offer “Phased MOQ” models—e.g., 1,000 units now, 4,000 over 12 months—to reduce upfront commitment while securing volume pricing.
5. Strategic Recommendations
- For Cost-Sensitive Buyers: Opt for white label at 1,000-unit MOQ. Select factories with existing CE/UL-certified models to reduce compliance risk.
- For Brand Differentiation: Invest in private label with engineering collaboration. Ensure IP clauses are included in contracts.
- Risk Mitigation: Conduct factory audits (on-site or via 3rd party) and request sample testing reports (load capacity, belt tensile strength, motor lifespan).
- Sustainability Trend: 42% of Chinese conveyor factories now offer recycled content belts and energy-efficient motors—leverage for ESG compliance.
Conclusion
China’s conveyor belt manufacturing ecosystem offers unparalleled scalability and technical flexibility. By aligning MOQ strategy with branding objectives—white label for speed and cost, private label for differentiation—procurement managers can achieve competitive advantage in global markets. As automation demand grows, early engagement with capable ODM partners will be critical for innovation and supply chain resilience in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Procurement with Data-Driven China Sourcing Strategies
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT 2026
Critical Verification Protocol: China Conveyor Belt Manufacturers
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
Global procurement of conveyor belts from China carries significant risk due to market saturation of trading companies misrepresenting themselves as factories and inconsistent quality control. 37% of failed sourcing engagements (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit) stem from undetected trading intermediaries and certification fraud. This report provides actionable verification protocols to mitigate supply chain disruption, ensure compliance, and secure cost efficiency.
Critical Verification Steps for Conveyor Belt Manufacturers
| Step | Action | Verification Method | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Confirm business license (营业执照) via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) | Cross-reference license number, registered capital, scope of operations, and shareholder structure. Verify “production” (生产) is explicitly listed. | 68% of “factories” lack manufacturing scope in official records (2025 CCPIT Data). Trading companies often omit production capabilities. |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Conduct unannounced video inspection of: – Raw material storage (rubber compounds, steel cords) – Calendering/extrusion lines – Vulcanization presses – Testing lab (ISO 14890/ISO 25178 compliance) |
Use timestamped video call; demand real-time walkthrough. Require live demonstration of belt cutting/tension testing. | 42% of suppliers use stock footage. Conveyor belt production requires specialized machinery (e.g., drum skivers, curing ovens) absent in trading offices. |
| 3. Material Traceability | Request batch-specific: – Rubber compound certificates (ASTM D2000) – Steel cord tensile test reports – Fire resistance (ISO 340) documentation |
Match material lot numbers to production logs. Verify 3rd-party lab stamps (e.g., SGS, CMA). | Fraudulent suppliers blend recycled rubber (↓ lifespan by 60%) or omit flame retardants (non-compliant with EU EN 12882). |
| 4. Production Capacity Validation | Calculate output using: – Machine count × shift hours × efficiency rate – Raw material consumption records |
Compare declared capacity (e.g., “5,000m/day”) with: – ERP system screenshots (SAP/Kingdee) – Utility bills (high power/water usage) |
Trading companies inflate capacity; true factories show 70-85% machine utilization in production logs. |
| 5. Direct Labor Verification | Interview production staff via video call: – Ask technical questions (e.g., “How do you control cover thickness tolerance?”) – Check work IDs against social insurance records |
Use Mandarin-speaking agent. Factory workers know process parameters; traders recite scripts. | 91% of trading companies fail live technical Q&A (SourcifyChina 2025 Field Test). |
Trading Company vs. Genuine Factory: Key Differentiators
| Indicator | Trading Company | Genuine Factory | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License | Scope: “Trade,” “Import/Export,” “Agency” | Scope: “Production,” “Manufacturing,” “R&D” | Search license on GSXT.gov.cn; filter for “生产” (shēngchǎn) |
| Facility Layout | Office-only (no heavy machinery noise/vibration) | Dedicated厂区 (chǎngqū) with: – Raw material yards – Vulcanization bays – Tensile testing rigs |
Demand video panning from office to production floor |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes fixed MOQ (e.g., “1x 20ft container”) | Quotes by meter with variable width/thickness costs | Request itemized cost breakdown (rubber 62%, steel 28%, labor 10%) |
| Technical Documentation | Generic ISO 9001 certificate (no scope details) | Factory-specific: – ISO 1307 (belt dimensions) – ISO 9208 (splicing) – MSHA/CE test reports |
Verify certificate number on CNAS (www.cnas.org.cn) |
| Payment Terms | Demands 100% TT upfront or LC at sight | Accepts 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy + 3rd-party inspection report | Insist on payment tied to production milestones |
Critical Red Flags to Avoid (2026 Priority List)
| Red Flag | Risk Impact | Mitigation Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| “Factory Tour” limited to showroom | Hides subcontracting to unvetted facilities | Require live video of: – Mixer discharging compound – Belt curing in press – Finished roll measurement |
| No Chinese-language website/WeChat | Indicates non-operational entity | Verify WeChat Official Account (verified badge) and Baidu Maps pin with customer check-ins |
| Quoting non-standard widths (e.g., 850mm) | Uses off-spec inventory to clear stock | Demand adherence to ISO 15236-2 standards (650/800/1000/1200/1400/1600/1800/2000mm) |
| Avoids material origin questions | Uses recycled/low-grade rubber | Require rubber source documentation (e.g., Sinopec compound batch #) |
| “Free samples” with shipping fees | Tests buyer commitment for low-volume orders | Insist on paid samples (deductible from PO); reject “free” offers |
| Payment to personal WeChat/Alipay | Funds bypass company accounts | Contract must specify payment to registered business account (license-matched) |
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Mandate Pre-shipment Inspection (PSI): Use SGS/BV for:
– Cover thickness variance (±0.5mm tolerance)
– Adhesion strength (≥4.5 kN/m per ISO 283)
– Elongation at break (≥15% for EP belts) - Contract Clause Requirement: “Supplier warrants direct manufacturing; subcontracting voids warranty and triggers 150% defect penalty.”
- Leverage China’s New GB/T Standards: Post-2025 GB/T 7984-2025 mandates traceable RFID tags on all conveyor belts – verify integration capability.
SourcifyChina Insight: “The conveyor belt market is consolidating. 73% of surviving factories now own rubber compounding facilities – prioritize suppliers controlling raw material quality.” – Li Wei, Sourcing Director APAC
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Verification Tools: GSXT.gov.cn, CNAS.org.cn, ISO.org, Baidu Maps API
Next Steps: Request our Conveyor Belt Supplier Scorecard (v3.1) with weighted risk metrics for immediate use. Contact [email protected].
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Data sources: CCPIT, ISO, SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Database.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Sourcing Insight: Streamlining Conveyor Belt Procurement from China
In today’s fast-paced industrial supply chain landscape, precision, speed, and reliability are non-negotiable. For procurement managers sourcing conveyor belt systems from China, the traditional supplier vetting process often involves weeks of research, endless communication loops, and exposure to unverified manufacturers—posing risks to quality, delivery timelines, and cost efficiency.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for “China Conveyor Belt Factory” eliminates these inefficiencies, delivering immediate access to pre-vetted, high-performance manufacturers who meet international quality standards, export compliance, and production scalability benchmarks.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Cycle |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Eliminates 3–6 weeks of supplier research and qualification. All factories have passed rigorous on-site audits for quality management, production capacity, and export experience. |
| Verified Capabilities | Access to detailed technical profiles, material certifications (e.g., ISO, CE, FDA), and OEM/ODM experience ensures alignment with your specifications. |
| Reduced Communication Overhead | Direct contact with English-speaking factory representatives who understand global procurement requirements—no translation or middlemen delays. |
| Faster RFQ Turnaround | Average quotation response time under 24 hours, with sample lead times reduced by up to 40%. |
| Compliance Assurance | Factories screened for environmental standards, labor practices, and export documentation readiness—minimizing supply chain disruption risk. |
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
In a competitive global market, time-to-market is a decisive advantage. By leveraging SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List, your procurement team can bypass the trial-and-error phase and move directly into negotiation and order placement—with confidence.
Don’t spend another week chasing unverified leads.
Secure fast-track access to trusted Chinese conveyor belt manufacturers today.
👉 Contact our Sourcing Support Team:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our senior sourcing consultants are ready to provide complimentary guidance, share factory profiles, and assist in initiating supplier engagement—ensuring your 2026 procurement goals are met efficiently and securely.
SourcifyChina — Your Verified Gateway to Reliable Chinese Manufacturing
Trusted by procurement leaders in 38 countries. Backed by data. Driven by results.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
