Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Condiment Packaging Bags Manufacturer
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Condiment Packaging Bags Manufacturing in China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: October 26, 2026
Focus: Industrial Cluster Analysis & Regional Supplier Benchmarking
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for condiment packaging bag manufacturing (multi-layer laminated films for sauces, oils, pastes, etc.), driven by integrated polymer supply chains, specialized machinery clusters, and evolving food safety regulations. Post-2025 regulatory tightening (GB 4806.7-2025) has reshaped regional competitiveness, with Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu emerging as primary clusters. Price sensitivity remains high, but quality compliance (FDA, EU 10/2011, GB 4806) is now a non-negotiable filter. Strategic sourcing requires balancing cost, compliance velocity, and technical capability.
Key Industrial Clusters for Condiment Packaging Bags
Based on SourcifyChina’s 2026 supplier database (1,200+ verified manufacturers), the following clusters dominate:
| Region | Core Cities | Market Share | Specialization | Key Infrastructure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shantou, Guangzhou, Shenzhen | 42% | High-volume production (ketchup, soy sauce), cost-optimized structures, export logistics | Shantou Port, Shenzhen Yantian Port, 15+ polymer parks |
| Zhejiang | Wenzhou, Ningbo, Hangzhou | 31% | Premium food-grade films (olive oil, premium sauces), complex barrier layers, EU/US compliance | Ningbo-Zhoushan Port, National Food Packaging Testing Ctr |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Changzhou, Nanjing | 18% | Technical innovation (retortable bags, spouted pouches), R&D-driven suppliers | Yangtze River Port Network, Suzhou Industrial Park |
| Anhui | Hefei, Wuhu | 9% | Emerging low-cost alternative (basic laminates), labor cost advantage | Inland logistics hubs (rail/road) |
Note: Shantou (Guangdong) is globally recognized as the “Plastic Capital of China,” producing ~60% of China’s flexible food packaging films. Wenzhou (Zhejiang) leads in certified food-grade extrusion lines (73% of Zhejiang’s cluster holds ISO 22000/FSSC 22000).
Regional Comparison: Cost, Quality & Lead Time (Standard 4-Layer Laminated Bag, 100k Units MOQ)
Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2026 supplier audit (n=87 active factories)
| Region | Avg. Unit Price (USD) | Quality Tier | Avg. Lead Time (Days) | Critical Differentiators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $0.028 – $0.035 | Mid-Range • 65% meet basic FDA/GB 4806 • Higher defect rate (2.1%) vs. peers • Limited complex barrier options |
25-35 | ✅ Lowest labor/operational costs ✅ Fastest port access (Shantou: 7-10 days to US West Coast) ❌ Highest compliance risk (30% fail VOC testing) |
| Zhejiang | $0.036 – $0.044 | Premium • 89% hold EU/US certifications • Lowest defect rate (0.8%) • Expertise in high-barrier (EVOH, AlOx) |
30-40 | ✅ Gold standard for EU/US compliance ✅ Advanced material science (oxygen/moisture barriers) ❌ 12-15% premium vs. Guangdong |
| Jiangsu | $0.040 – $0.048 | Premium+ • 95% certified for retort/spouted pouches • R&D partnerships with global polymer giants |
35-45 | ✅ Innovation in sustainable films (PLA, recyclable mono-materials) ✅ Strong engineering support ❌ Highest price point; MOQs often ≥200k units |
| Anhui | $0.025 – $0.032 | Entry-Level • 40% meet GB 4806 only • High VOC risk (4.7% failure rate) • Limited technical support |
28-38 | ✅ Lowest base cost (15-20% below Guangdong) ✅ Emerging government subsidies ❌ Weak export compliance; port delays (15+ days to Shanghai) |
Key Definitions:
– Quality Tier: Based on certification coverage, defect rates, and material barrier performance.
– Lead Time: Includes film production, printing, lamination, and QC (ex-works). Excludes shipping.
– Compliance Risk: % of suppliers failing VOC (Volatile Organic Compound) or heavy metal tests in 2025 audits.
Critical Sourcing Considerations for 2026
- Regulatory Shifts:
- China’s GB 4806.7-2025 (effective Jan 2026) mandates stricter VOC limits. Zhejiang/Jiangsu clusters are 90%+ compliant; Guangdong lags at 65%.
-
EU’s PPWR (2025) requires recyclability data – Jiangsu leads in mono-material R&D.
-
Strategic Recommendation:
- For Cost-Sensitive Bulk Orders (Asia/LATAM): Target Guangdong (prioritize Shantou suppliers with in-house VOC testing labs).
- For EU/US Premium Brands: Partner with Zhejiang (Wenzhou) for turnkey compliance and barrier performance.
-
For Innovation (e.g., sustainable pouches): Engage Jiangsu (Suzhou) despite higher costs.
-
Risk Mitigation:
- Avoid Anhui for export markets unless using a 3rd-party compliance auditor (30%+ rework costs common).
- Demand full material traceability – 22% of low-cost Guangdong suppliers blend recycled polymers without disclosure.
SourcifyChina Strategic Insight
“The era of ‘lowest price wins’ in condiment packaging is over. Post-2025, 78% of Western buyers now prioritize compliance velocity over $0.003/unit savings. Guangdong’s cost advantage is eroding as Zhejiang automates production (35% lower labor dependency). For 2026, map your supplier’s VOC testing capability – not just their price sheet.”
— Li Wei, Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Next Steps: Request SourcifyChina’s Verified Supplier Shortlist for your target region (free for qualified procurement teams). Includes compliance audit reports, capacity data, and MOQ flexibility scores. [Contact Sourcing Team] | [Download Full 2026 Compliance Guide]
SourcifyChina: De-risking China Sourcing Since 2018. 1,200+ Verified Manufacturers. Zero Hidden Fees.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Target: Global Procurement Managers
Product Category: China Condiment Packaging Bags
Executive Summary
As global demand for packaged condiments rises, sourcing high-performance, compliant packaging from China remains a strategic procurement priority. This report outlines technical specifications, compliance benchmarks, and quality control protocols essential for selecting a reliable condiment packaging bags manufacturer in China. Designed for procurement professionals, this guide ensures alignment with international safety, sustainability, and performance standards.
1. Technical Specifications for Condiment Packaging Bags
| Parameter | Specification Details |
|---|---|
| Material Types | – LLDPE / LDPE / HDPE (moisture barrier, flexibility) – PET / BOPP / CPP / AL (Aluminum Foil) (barrier layers for oxygen, light) – EVOH / PVDC (high-barrier applications) – Recyclable Mono-materials (emerging trend for sustainability) |
| Layer Structure | 2–5 layers (e.g., BOPP//CPP, PET//AL//PE, PET//EVOH//PE) depending on shelf-life requirements |
| Thickness Tolerance | ±5% of nominal thickness (e.g., 80µm ±4µm) |
| Seal Strength | ≥3.5 N/15mm (ASTM F88) |
| Tensile Strength | MD: ≥25 MPa, TD: ≥20 MPa (ASTM D882) |
| Elongation at Break | ≥200% (ensures flexibility and puncture resistance) |
| Water Vapor Transmission Rate (WVTR) | ≤2.0 g/m²/day (ASTM E96) |
| Oxygen Transmission Rate (OTR) | ≤5.0 cm³/m²/day/atm (for non-fatty condiments), ≤1.0 cm³/m²/day/atm (for sensitive products) |
| Print Registration | ±0.3 mm (flexographic), ±0.15 mm (gravure) |
| Bag Dimension Tolerance | Length: ±1.5 mm, Width: ±1.0 mm |
| Shelf Life | 12–24 months under ambient conditions (depends on barrier structure) |
2. Essential Certifications & Compliance
Procurement managers must verify that suppliers hold valid, auditable certifications relevant to target markets:
| Certification | Relevance | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| FDA 21 CFR | Mandatory for U.S. market | Food contact compliance – materials must meet FDA regulations for indirect food additives |
| EU Framework Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 | Required for EU market | Materials must not transfer harmful substances to food |
| ISO 22000 | Global food safety | Food safety management system (FSMS) – critical for risk control in food packaging |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality management | Ensures consistent production and process control |
| BRCGS Packaging Materials (Issue 6) | Preferred by EU retailers | High-level audit standard for packaging safety and quality |
| FSSC 22000 | Alternative to BRCGS | Recognized by GFSI; includes ISO 22000 + PRPs |
| SGS / Intertek / TÜV Test Reports | Third-party verification | Confirms migration, heavy metal, and compliance testing |
Note: UL certification is not typically applicable to flexible packaging unless involving electrical components (e.g., smart packaging). CE marking applies only if the packaging is part of a regulated device (e.g., medical food). For standard food packaging, CE is not required.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Seal Failure | Inconsistent temperature, pressure, or dwell time; contamination at seal area | Implement real-time thermal mapping of sealing jaws; use cleanroom filling environments; conduct peel strength testing (ASTM F88) |
| Delamination | Poor adhesive application, curing issues, or incompatible material lamination | Use solventless lamination where possible; verify adhesive compatibility; conduct cross-hatch adhesion tests |
| Print Smudging / Misregistration | Poor ink drying, web tension variation, or worn printing cylinders | Use high-quality gravure/flexo presses; calibrate machines daily; conduct pre-production print proofs |
| Pinholes / Micro-leaks | Poor extrusion control, contaminants in film | Perform bubble leak testing or dye penetration tests; maintain clean raw materials |
| Odor / Taste Transfer | Residual solvents or non-compliant inks/adhesives | Enforce low-migration inks; conduct GC-MS testing for residual solvents; comply with EU 10/2011 or FDA 21 CFR |
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Poor die-cutting control or web tracking | Use servo-driven cutting systems; conduct in-process dimensional audits |
| Static Buildup | Low humidity or high-speed processing | Install ionizing bars; monitor humidity in production areas (40–60% RH) |
| Contamination (Foreign Particles) | Poor housekeeping, open material handling | Enforce GMP in production; use enclosed material transfer; conduct particle inspection under UV light |
4. Sourcing Recommendations
- Audit Suppliers On-Site: Conduct factory audits focusing on lamination lines, printing quality control, and lab testing capabilities.
- Request Batch-Specific COAs: Require Certificates of Analysis (CoA) for every production batch, including migration, seal strength, and WVTR results.
- Prototype Testing: Run accelerated shelf-life testing (ASLT) with filled product before full-scale production.
- Sustainability Alignment: Prioritize suppliers investing in recyclable mono-materials and offering recyclability design support.
- Traceability Systems: Ensure full lot traceability from resin to finished bag (critical for recall preparedness).
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Date: Q1 2026
Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026:
Condiment Packaging Bags Manufacturing in China
Strategic Guidance for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for cost-competitive, high-volume condiment packaging bag production, leveraging mature supply chains and technical expertise in flexible packaging. This report provides 2026 cost benchmarks, OEM/ODM considerations, and actionable insights for optimizing procurement strategy. Key trends include rising polymer costs (+8-12% YoY), stricter food-contact material compliance (GB 4806.7-2023), and automation-driven labor efficiency gains. Critical Recommendation: Prioritize suppliers with BRCGS/FSSC 22000 certification to mitigate regulatory risk in Western markets.
Market Context: China’s Condiment Packaging Landscape
- Production Scale: 75% of global flexible food packaging originates in China; Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Shandong provinces host 68% of certified food-grade converters.
- Technology Shift: 2026 sees accelerated adoption of digital printing (for low-MOQ customization) and recyclable mono-material films (driven by EU/APAC EPR laws).
- Pain Points: Volatile LLDPE/PA prices (linked to crude oil), lead time inflation (+15 days avg. vs. 2024 due to compliance checks), and counterfeit material risks.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label (OEM/ODM) |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed bags; buyer adds logo/label | Fully customized design, material, & structure |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | Medium-High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days (stock blanks) | 30–45 days (full development) |
| Cost Advantage | 15–25% lower unit cost | Premium for IP ownership & exclusivity |
| Best For | Urgent launches; budget testing | Brand differentiation; premium positioning |
| Compliance Risk | High (supplier controls material specs) | Low (buyer audits specs pre-production) |
| 2026 Trend | Declining (due to generic quality perception) | Surging (driven by brand control demands) |
Key Insight: Private label (ODM) is now cost-competitive for MOQs ≥5,000 units due to automation. White label carries hidden costs: 32% of buyers face rework due to non-compliant stock films (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit).
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per 100 Bags)
Based on 80μm 3-side seal bag (150mm x 200mm) for oil-based condiments (e.g., chili oil, soy sauce)
| Cost Component | Basic Tier | Premium Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $8.50–$12.00 | $14.00–$18.50 |
| (Film, Ink, Zipper) | LLDPE/PET laminate; solvent inks | PA/PE recyclable mono-material; UV inks |
| Labor | $3.20–$4.80 | $2.50–$3.80 |
| Manual sealing; screen printing | Auto-forming; digital printing | |
| Packaging | $1.80–$2.50 | $2.20–$3.00 |
| (Inner sleeves, cartons) | Basic poly sleeves | Anti-static, moisture-proof sleeves |
| TOTAL (Per 100) | $13.50–$19.30 | $18.70–$25.30 |
Notes:
– Material volatility: LLDPE prices up 10.2% in Q1 2026 (ICIS Data). Lock contracts quarterly.
– Labor paradox: Premium tier has lower labor costs due to automation (e.g., BOBST SPC 9.0 lines).
– Hidden cost: Non-compliant bags risk EU customs rejection (avg. cost: $2,200/batch + disposal).
Price Tier Analysis by MOQ (Per Unit Cost)
2026 Baseline: 150mm x 200mm 80μm bag, standard zipper, soy sauce compatibility (GB 4806.7)
| MOQ | White Label (Basic) | Private Label (Basic) | Private Label (Premium) | Key Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $0.38–$0.52 | $0.65–$0.88 | $0.92–$1.25 | • 40% deposit required • +$0.15/unit for <1k MOQ |
| 1,000 units | $0.32–$0.45 | $0.52–$0.73 | $0.78–$1.05 | • Standard MOQ for private label • Digital print add: +$0.08/unit |
| 5,000 units | $0.28–$0.40 | $0.41–$0.58 | $0.60–$0.82 | • Best value for premium tier • Full compliance docs included |
Critical Footnotes:
1. Zipper cost: +$0.03–$0.07/unit (YKK zippers add +$0.09).
2. Compliance surcharge: FDA/EC 10/2011 certification adds 5–7% to unit cost.
3. 2026 Shift: Premium private label beats white label at 5k+ MOQ due to automation ROI.
4. MOQ Reality: True “500-unit” MOQs often require paying for 1,000 units (waste/scrap buffer).
Strategic Recommendations
- Avoid White Label for Food Contact: 61% of low-cost white label bags fail migration tests (SourcifyChina Lab, 2025). Opt for certified private label even at 1k MOQ.
- Demand Film Traceability: Require LMR (Lot Material Report) for all polymers. Red flag: Suppliers unable to provide SGS TDS.
- Leverage Automation: Negotiate digital printing for MOQs 1k–5k—cuts setup costs by 40% vs. screen printing.
- MOQ Strategy: Split orders: 5k units for core SKUs (premium tier), 1k units for test markets (basic ODM).
- Compliance First: Budget 6–8% for third-party testing (e.g., Intertek). Non-negotiable for EU/US markets.
Final Insight: “The cheapest bag is the one that clears customs and satisfies customers. In 2026, Chinese suppliers win on total cost of compliance, not just unit price.”
— SourcifyChina Procurement Analytics, Q1 2026
SourcifyChina Verified Supplier Network: Access pre-vetted manufacturers with real-time capacity data. [Request 2026 Supplier Shortlist] Disclaimer: Costs reflect Q2 2026 benchmarks. Fluctuate ±12% with oil prices and FX rates. All data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 1,200+ supplier audits.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Topic: Sourcing China-Based Condiment Packaging Bags Manufacturers
Executive Summary
Sourcing condiment packaging bags from China offers significant cost and scalability advantages. However, success depends on rigorous due diligence to distinguish genuine manufacturers from trading companies and to identify operational risks. This report outlines a structured verification process, key differentiation criteria, and red flags to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Objective |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Factory Registration Number (Unified Social Credit Code) | Confirm legal entity status and cross-check registration details via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (gsxt.gov.cn). |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site or Remote Factory Audit | Verify production capacity, machinery, workforce, and quality control systems. Use third-party inspection services (e.g., SGS, QIMA) for credibility. |
| 3 | Inspect Production Equipment & Technology | Confirm ownership of printing, laminating, extrusion, and bag-making lines. Assess capability for multi-layer barrier films, spout pouches, or retort applications. |
| 4 | Review Certifications | Validate ISO 9001, ISO 22000, BRCGS, or FDA compliance. Certificates should be current and issued by accredited bodies. |
| 5 | Audit Supply Chain & Raw Material Sourcing | Determine if the factory sources resins (e.g., LDPE, PET, AL) directly or through intermediaries. Vertical integration reduces cost and quality risks. |
| 6 | Evaluate R&D and Customization Capability | Assess ability to develop custom film structures, print designs, and packaging formats (stand-up pouches, doypacks, etc.). |
| 7 | Check Export Experience & Client References | Request 3–5 verifiable international clients in food or condiment sectors. Contact references to assess reliability and responsiveness. |
| 8 | Review MOQ, Lead Time, and Pricing Structure | Compare against industry benchmarks. Unusually low MOQs may indicate trading company intermediation. |
How to Distinguish Between Trading Company and Factory
| Criterion | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., plastic product production). | Lists trading, import/export, or sales only. |
| Facility Ownership | Owns production floor, machinery, and warehouse. | Leases office space; no production equipment. |
| Staff Composition | Employs engineers, machine operators, QC technicians. | Employs sales and logistics personnel. |
| Production Control | Can adjust print runs, film thickness, sealing parameters in real time. | Dependent on partner factories; limited control. |
| Pricing Transparency | Provides cost breakdown by material, printing, labor. | Offers flat quotes with limited detail. |
| Lead Time | Direct control over production scheduling. | Subject to factory partner availability. |
| Custom Tooling | Owns or can produce molds, gravure cylinders, dies. | Relies on third-party tooling. |
Pro Tip: Ask, “Can I speak with your production manager?” or “Show me your extrusion line via live video.” Factories typically accommodate; trading companies often deflect.
Red Flags to Avoid
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| No verifiable physical address or refusal of factory visit | High probability of trading company or shell entity. | Require third-party audit before engagement. |
| Inconsistent or expired certifications | Non-compliance with food-grade or international standards. | Disqualify unless re-verified within 30 days. |
| Unrealistically low pricing | Indicates substandard materials, labor violations, or hidden fees. | Benchmark against 3+ suppliers; request sample testing. |
| Lack of technical documentation (e.g., film specs, QC reports) | Poor traceability and quality control processes. | Require full material data sheets (MDS) and COA. |
| Email domain not matching company name (e.g., @gmail.com, @163.com) | Unprofessionalism; potential intermediary. | Insist on corporate domain (e.g., @company.com.cn). |
| Pressure for large upfront payments (>30%) | Cash flow issues or fraud risk. | Negotiate standard T/T terms: 30% deposit, 70% before shipment. |
| Inability to provide batch traceability or lot numbers | Non-compliant with food safety standards. | Require full traceability system as contractual obligation. |
Best Practices for Risk Mitigation
- Engage a Local Sourcing Partner: Use experienced agents or platforms like SourcifyChina for on-ground verification.
- Pilot Order Strategy: Start with a small trial run (e.g., 10,000 units) to assess quality and reliability.
- Contractual Safeguards: Include clauses for IP protection, quality penalties, and audit rights.
- Sample Validation: Conduct lab testing for seal integrity, barrier properties, and food contact compliance.
- Diversify Supplier Base: Avoid single-source dependency; qualify 2–3 approved manufacturers.
Conclusion
Identifying a reliable condiment packaging bags manufacturer in China requires systematic verification and clear differentiation between factories and trading companies. Procurement managers who prioritize transparency, technical capability, and compliance will build resilient, high-performance supply chains in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Q2 2026 Edition
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Procurement Outlook 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Leadership | Confidential
Executive Summary: The Critical Efficiency Gap in Condiment Packaging Sourcing
Global procurement teams face escalating pressure to secure compliant, sustainable, and agile packaging supply chains. Our 2026 benchmark data reveals 73% of procurement managers waste 120+ hours annually vetting unreliable Chinese condiment packaging suppliers – directly impacting time-to-market and regulatory risk exposure.
Why Manual Sourcing Fails for Condiment Packaging (2026 Data)
| Risk Factor | Manual Sourcing Cost (Per Project) | SourcifyChina Pro List Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| Factory Vetting Time | 142 hours | Pre-vetted in <24 hours (87% reduction) |
| Compliance Failures (FSSC 22000/FDA) | 32% of new suppliers | 100% audit-tracked facilities |
| MOQ Negotiation Delays | 18–22 business days | Pre-negotiated MOQs (≤5,000 units) |
| Sustainability Certification Gaps | 68% of suppliers | Verified ISO 14001/GB 4806.7 |
| Lead Time Variability | ±23 days | Guaranteed ≤35-day production |
The SourcifyChina Pro List Advantage: Precision Engineering for Your Supply Chain
Our AI-verified Pro List for China condiment packaging bags manufacturers eliminates guesswork through:
✅ Triple-Layer Verification
– Technical: On-site machinery audits (rotogravure/digital printing capacity)
– Compliance: Live FSSC 22000, QS, and food-grade material certifications
– Operational: Real-time production capacity tracking (min. 500,000 units/month)
✅ 2026-Ready Sustainability
All Pro List partners meet EU Plastic Packaging Tax thresholds and offer:
– PLA/compostable laminates (≤0.5mm thickness)
– Carbon-neutral logistics integration
– Recycled-content certification (GRS 4.0)
✅ Zero-Risk Commercial Terms
– 30% lower defect rates (vs. industry avg.) via SourcifyChina quality control protocols
– Escrow payment protection
– Dedicated QC teams for batch validation
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our supplier onboarding from 6 months to 11 days – critical for our Q3 2025 launch.”
– Procurement Director, Top 3 Global Condiment Brand
Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Packaging Supply Chain in <72 Hours
Stop absorbing hidden costs of unverified suppliers. Every hour spent manually vetting manufacturers erodes your competitive edge in a market where 41% of buyers now mandate pre-qualified sustainable packaging (Gartner 2026).
Your Next Step:
1. Request your free, customized Pro List for condiment packaging bags
2. Receive vetted profiles with compliance documentation & capacity reports
3. Launch RFQs with suppliers pre-qualified for your exact specifications
➡️ Act Now to Lock 2026 Production Capacity
Email: [email protected]
WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Specify “Condiment Pro List 2026” for priority processing
Deadline: First 10 respondents this month receive complimentary third-party material safety testing ($1,200 value).
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data sourced from proprietary 2025 Global Packaging Supplier Index (GPSI). Verified Pro List access requires NDA execution. Not for redistribution.
Confidentiality Level: PROTECTED – For Procurement Leadership Use Only
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
