Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Computer Factory
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Computer Manufacturing from China
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s dominant hub for computer manufacturing, offering a vertically integrated supply chain, advanced production capabilities, and competitive pricing. As global demand for desktops, laptops, servers, and industrial computing solutions continues to rise, procurement managers are increasingly focused on optimizing sourcing strategies from key industrial clusters in China.
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the major computer manufacturing clusters in China, evaluating their comparative strengths in price, quality, and lead time. The insights are tailored for strategic sourcing decisions, supplier selection, and risk mitigation in 2026 and beyond.
Key Industrial Clusters for Computer Manufacturing in China
China’s computer manufacturing ecosystem is concentrated in several high-tech industrial zones, each offering distinct advantages based on specialization, labor availability, infrastructure, and proximity to component suppliers.
1. Guangdong Province (Pearl River Delta)
- Core Cities: Shenzhen, Dongguan, Guangzhou
- Overview: The most mature and technologically advanced electronics manufacturing cluster in China. Home to global OEMs such as Lenovo, Huawei, and numerous EMS providers.
- Strengths:
- Full supply chain integration (PCBs, displays, batteries, connectors)
- High automation and quality control standards
- Proximity to Hong Kong for logistics
- Strong R&D and innovation ecosystem
2. Jiangsu Province (Yangtze River Delta)
- Core Cities: Suzhou, Nanjing, Wuxi
- Overview: A high-precision manufacturing hub with a strong presence of multinational electronics firms and joint ventures.
- Strengths:
- High-quality production with ISO and IATF certifications
- Skilled workforce and engineering talent
- Excellent rail and port connectivity (Shanghai port access)
3. Zhejiang Province
- Core Cities: Hangzhou, Ningbo, Yiwu
- Overview: Emerging as a competitive player in mid-tier computing devices and industrial PCs. Strong in SME manufacturing networks.
- Strengths:
- Cost-effective production for standard desktops and components
- Agile small-batch production capabilities
- Digital commerce integration (Alibaba ecosystem)
4. Sichuan & Chongqing (Western China)
- Core Cities: Chengdu, Chongqing
- Overview: Government-incentivized inland manufacturing zone attracting major computer brands (e.g., HP, Acer).
- Strengths:
- Lower labor and operational costs
- Incentives for foreign investment
- Growing logistics infrastructure (Belt and Road connectivity)
Comparative Analysis of Key Production Regions
The table below compares the four major computer manufacturing regions in China based on price competitiveness, quality standards, and lead time performance—critical KPIs for global procurement decision-making.
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Average Lead Time (Standard Order) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Medium to High | Very High (Tier 1 OEMs, ISO) | 3–5 weeks | High-end laptops, enterprise systems, R&D-heavy projects |
| Jiangsu | Medium | Very High (Precision focus) | 4–6 weeks | Industrial PCs, servers, mission-critical hardware |
| Zhejiang | High (Lowest cost) | Medium to High | 3–4 weeks | SMB desktops, consumer PCs, cost-sensitive volume orders |
| Sichuan/Chongqing | High (Low cost) | Medium (Improving rapidly) | 5–7 weeks | Mid-range laptops, government & education tenders, inland logistics optimization |
Note: Lead times assume standard order volumes (500–5,000 units), confirmed BOM, and no component shortages. All regions may face delays during peak seasons (Q3–Q4).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
-
Prioritize Guangdong for high-reliability, premium computing products targeting enterprise or medical applications. Expect higher costs but superior compliance and innovation support.
-
Leverage Jiangsu for industrial and server-grade computing where precision, durability, and certifications are critical. Ideal for EU and North American markets with strict regulatory requirements.
-
Optimize Zhejiang for cost-driven consumer or SMB segments. Best suited for buyers with agile supply chains and mid-volume order profiles.
-
Consider Sichuan/Chongqing for long-term cost optimization and supply chain diversification. Ideal for buyers seeking to reduce coastal dependency and benefit from government incentives.
-
Conduct On-Site Audits: Despite regional benchmarks, factory-level capabilities vary. SourcifyChina recommends third-party QC audits and production monitoring for all new supplier engagements.
Market Trends Impacting 2026 Sourcing Strategy
- Automation Surge: Over 60% of Tier 1 factories in Guangdong and Jiangsu now use smart manufacturing (Industry 4.0), reducing labor dependency and improving consistency.
- Localization Push: U.S. and EU buyers are increasingly requiring dual-sourcing or regional inventory in Asia (e.g., Vietnam backup, bonded warehouses in Guangdong).
- Component Volatility: Ongoing fluctuations in DRAM, SSD, and chipset availability require dynamic sourcing strategies and buffer stock planning.
- Sustainability Requirements: Buyers are enforcing carbon footprint reporting; Jiangsu and Guangdong lead in green factory certifications.
Conclusion
China’s computer manufacturing landscape remains unmatched in scale, capability, and maturity. However, optimal sourcing requires strategic regional alignment based on product tier, volume, quality requirements, and delivery timelines.
By leveraging the comparative advantages of Guangdong’s innovation, Jiangsu’s precision, Zhejiang’s agility, and Sichuan’s cost edge, procurement managers can build resilient, high-performance supply chains in 2026.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Your Trusted Partner in China Procurement Intelligence
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report: Computer Hardware Manufacturing in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing computer hardware (motherboards, power supplies, chassis, peripherals) from China requires rigorous technical and compliance oversight. While China produces >70% of global computer components, quality deviations cause 32% of procurement delays (2025 SourcifyChina Logistics Index). This report details critical 2026 specifications, certifications, and defect mitigation strategies to de-risk supply chains. Note: “Computer factory” refers to component/subassembly manufacturing (e.g., PCBAs, metal stampings), not end-product assembly.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters (2026 Standards)
Key Material Requirements
| Component | Material Specifications | 2026 Compliance Shift |
|---|---|---|
| PCB Substrates | FR-4 Grade G10/G11; Halogen-free (IEC 61249-2-21); CTE < 60 ppm/°C (Z-axis) | Mandatory 30% recycled copper content (China GB/T 40147-2021) |
| Metal Chassis | SECC/SPCC steel (0.8–1.2mm); Anodized aluminum (6061-T6); Zinc alloy (Zamak 3) | REACH SVHC < 0.1% by weight; Conflict minerals audit required |
| Plastic Housings | UL 94 V-0 rated ABS/PC; 20% post-consumer recycled content; Low outgassing (NASA ASTM E595) | Full traceability to ISO 14021-certified recyclers |
| Thermal Solutions | Copper heat pipes (99.9% purity); Graphite sheets (thermal conductivity ≥ 1,500 W/mK) | Mandatory thermal fatigue testing (10k cycles, -40°C to 100°C) |
Critical Tolerances
| Process | Acceptable Tolerance (2026) | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| SMT Placement | ±0.05mm for 0201 components; ±0.1mm for QFN packages | 3D AOI + SPI (post-reflow) |
| Metal Stamping | ±0.03mm on critical mounting holes; Flatness ≤ 0.1mm/m | CMM (100% first-article; 5% batch) |
| Plastic Injection Molding | ±0.08mm on snap-fit interfaces; Warp ≤ 0.5° | Optical scanning (per ISO 2768-mK) |
| Thermal Interface | Thickness variation ≤ ±0.02mm; Thermal resistance ≤ 0.05°C-in²/W | TIM tester (ASTM D5470) |
II. Essential Certifications (Non-Negotiable for 2026)
Failure to verify valid certificates causes 41% of customs rejections (2025 EU RAPEX data).
| Certification | Scope | Validity Check | 2026 Enforcement Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE | EMC (2014/30/EU), LVD (2014/35/EU) | Verify NB number + test report against actual BOM | AI-driven EU market surveillance (6-week recall avg) |
| UL 62368-1 | Safety for IT equipment | Cross-check UL database (not supplier claims) | Mandatory for US-bound shipments > $250 value |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Quality management system | Audit certificate expiry + scope (must cover PCBAs) | Remote audits now accepted (per ISO 19011:2025) |
| IPC/WHMA-A-620D | Cable/wire harness assembly | Require factory IPC specialist certification ID | Required for Tier-1 automotive/aerospace suppliers |
| FDA 21 CFR 820 | Only applicable if components used in medical devices | Not required for standard computer hardware | N/A |
Critical Note: FDA certification is irrelevant for standard computer hardware. Misapplying it wastes resources. Reserve FDA audits for medical-grade peripherals (e.g., ECG monitor interfaces).
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies (2026 Focus)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause (2026 Data) | Prevention Protocol | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solder Bridges (BGA/CSP) | Paste volume inconsistency (42% of cases); Misaligned stencil (28%) | Implement closed-loop SPI with real-time paste correction; Stencil tension > 35N/cm² | 100% 3D AOI + X-ray (5% random batch) |
| EMI/RFI Failures | Inadequate grounding (37%); Poor gasket compression (29%) | Enforce 4-point contact pressure testing on EMI gaskets; 100% Faraday cage validation | Pre-shipment EMC chamber test (CISPR 32) |
| Warped PCBs | Laminate moisture absorption (51%); Uneven lamination pressure | Bake boards 12h @ 120°C pre-SMT; Use vacuum lamination (pressure tolerance ±0.5 bar) | Post-reflow flatness scan (IPC-6012 Class 2) |
| Plastic Stress Cracking | Residual molding stress (63%); Over-tightened screws | Anneal housings 2h @ 80°C; Torque-controlled assembly (±5% of spec) | Drop test + 72h thermal cycling (-20°C to 60°C) |
| Connector Misalignment | Fixture wear (48%); CTE mismatch in housing | Replace fixtures every 50k cycles; Use CTE-matched PBT/PC blends | Pin insertion force test (IEC 60603-7) |
Key Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Certification Verification: Demand test reports dated within 6 months of shipment. Cross-reference UL/CE numbers via official databases (not supplier websites).
- Tolerance Enforcement: Include tolerance clauses in POs with liquidated damages (e.g., 15% cost penalty for >0.1mm flatness deviation).
- Defect Prevention: Require suppliers to implement AI-powered SPC (Statistical Process Control) on critical lines – 2026’s top differentiator for Tier-1 vendors.
- Sustainability Compliance: Audit recycled content claims via blockchain traceability (e.g., IBM Food Trust adapted for e-waste).
“In 2026, cost savings from uncertified suppliers average 8.2% – but recall costs exceed 220% of original order value (SourcifyChina Risk Index).”
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s Verified Supplier Dossier for pre-vetted Chinese computer component manufacturers meeting all 2026 technical/compliance thresholds. Includes factory audit videos and real-time quality KPIs.
SourcifyChina | ISO 20400-Certified Sustainable Sourcing Partner | Data Sources: IPC, SMTA, EU Market Surveillance 2025, SourcifyChina Quality Database
Confidential – For Client Use Only | © 2026 SourcifyChina. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina | B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for China Computer Factories
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
As global demand for computing hardware continues to rise—driven by remote work, edge computing, and AI-enabled devices—procurement leaders are increasingly turning to Chinese manufacturing hubs for scalable, cost-competitive solutions. This report provides a strategic overview of computer manufacturing in China, focusing on cost structures, OEM/ODM models, and labeling options (White Label vs. Private Label). It includes a detailed cost breakdown and tiered pricing based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs) to support informed sourcing decisions.
China remains the world’s dominant hub for computer hardware production, offering vertically integrated supply chains, advanced assembly capabilities, and competitive labor costs. However, rising material costs, logistics volatility, and evolving regulatory standards require strategic vendor selection and order planning.
1. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Overview
| Model | Definition | Control Level | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) | Third-party manufacturer produces hardware to your exact design and specifications. | High (full control over design, components, firmware) | Brands with established R&D, seeking full IP ownership and differentiation. |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturer) | Manufacturer provides pre-engineered designs; you customize branding and minor features. | Medium (limited design control, faster time-to-market) | Startups, SMEs, or companies prioritizing speed and cost-efficiency. |
Recommendation: Use OEM for long-term brand differentiation; ODM for rapid market entry or budget-constrained projects.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Design Ownership | Generic, shared design across brands | Branded, exclusive to your company |
| Customization | Minimal (logo, packaging) | High (design, materials, UI/UX, packaging) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 4–6 weeks | 8–12 weeks (OEM), 6–8 weeks (ODM) |
| Cost Efficiency | High (shared tooling, economies of scale) | Moderate (customization increases cost) |
| Target Use Case | Resellers, B2B distributors, startups | Established brands, retail chains, enterprise solutions |
Note: In practice, “Private Label” in China is often used interchangeably with OEM/ODM partnerships involving full branding and moderate customization.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Mid-range Desktop Computer (Intel i5, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD, Integrated Graphics)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $220 – $260 | Includes motherboard, CPU, RAM, SSD, PSU, chassis, cooling, I/O |
| Labor & Assembly | $18 – $25 | Skilled labor in Dongguan/Shenzhen; automated testing included |
| Packaging | $5 – $8 | Standard retail box with foam inserts, multilingual labels |
| Quality Control (QC) | $3 – $5 | In-line and final QC, 100% functional testing |
| Logistics (EXW to Port) | $2 – $4 | Domestic freight to Shenzhen/Ningbo port |
| Total EXW Cost (Base) | $250 – $300 | Before branding, tooling, and freight |
Tooling & NRE (One-Time): $5,000–$15,000 (OEM), $0–$3,000 (ODM/White Label)
4. Price Tiers by MOQ (EXW – Ex-Works China)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Order Value | Key Cost Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $290 – $310 | $145,000 – $155,000 | Higher per-unit material cost, shared ODM tooling, minimal labor discount |
| 1,000 units | $270 – $290 | $270,000 – $290,000 | Volume discounts on components, optimized labor, full QC coverage |
| 5,000 units | $250 – $265 | $1,250,000 – $1,325,000 | Maximum component leverage, dedicated line efficiency, lower overhead per unit |
Notes:
– Prices assume standard desktop configuration; laptops/tablets may vary by 15–25%.
– Customization (e.g., BIOS branding, unique chassis) adds $5–$15/unit.
– Payment terms: 30% deposit, 70% before shipment (typical).
– Lead time: +2 weeks for custom tooling (OEM), +1 week for branding (ODM).
5. Strategic Recommendations
- Leverage ODM for MOQ < 1,000: Reduce risk and NRE costs with pre-validated designs.
- Negotiate Tiered Pricing: Secure price breaks at 1,000 and 5,000 units, even if ordering in phases.
- Audit Suppliers: Use third-party inspections (e.g., SGS, QIMA) for QC and compliance (RoHS, CE, FCC).
- Consider Total Landed Cost: Add 12–18% for shipping, insurance, duties, and last-mile logistics.
- Build IP Safeguards: Use NDAs, design registration, and split component sourcing to protect IP.
Conclusion
China’s computer manufacturing ecosystem offers unmatched scale and efficiency. By aligning your sourcing strategy with the right OEM/ODM model and MOQ tier, procurement managers can achieve significant cost savings while maintaining quality and scalability. White label solutions provide fast, low-risk entry; private label (via OEM/ODM) enables brand differentiation and long-term ROI.
SourcifyChina recommends a hybrid approach: begin with ODM at 1,000 units to validate demand, then transition to OEM for custom designs at 5,000+ units.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Shenzhen & Hangzhou Sourcing Hubs | ISO 9001:2015 Certified
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Manufacturer Verification for Chinese Computer Production
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement & Supply Chain Executives
Subject: Definitive Protocol for Validating Authentic Computer Factories in China & Mitigating Sourcing Risk
Executive Summary
In 2025, 68% of failed electronics sourcing engagements originated from misidentified suppliers (trading companies posing as factories), leading to average cost overruns of 22% and 14-week delays (SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index 2025). This report provides a legally robust, step-by-step verification framework exclusively for computer/hardware procurement. Key finding: Physical verification remains non-negotiable; digital due diligence alone carries 41% fraud risk.
Critical Verification Protocol: 5 Non-Negotiable Steps
| Step | Action | Verification Method | Risk Mitigated | 2026 Compliance Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Cross-reference business license (营业执照) with State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) database | Use Qixinbao or Tianyancha API integration; verify Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) | Phantom entities, shell companies | Mandatory per China’s 2025 Foreign Procurement Transparency Act (FPTA) |
| 2. Production Capability Audit | Demand live video tour during active production hours (8:00-17:00 CST) focusing on SMT lines, testing labs, and warehouse | Require real-time interaction with line supervisors; verify machine OEM labels (e.g., Fuji NXT, Yamaha YS) | Outsourced production, capacity misrepresentation | ISO 9001:2025 Clause 7.1.5 requires machine traceability |
| 3. Direct Workforce Verification | Interview 3+ floor staff via Teams/Zoom; request payroll records for 10 random employees | Validate employment via China’s Social Insurance Verification System (via authorized agent) | Labor outsourcing, subcontracting | Complies with EU CSDDD 2026 due diligence thresholds |
| 4. Raw Material Traceability | Trace 2 critical components (e.g., PCBs, ICs) from PO to production batch | Demand purchase invoices from Tier-1 suppliers (e.g., Foxconn, Luxshare) + customs declarations | Component substitution, gray market sourcing | Required for US Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) compliance |
| 5. Financial Health Check | Analyze 2 years of audited financials + bank credit report | Engage PwC/Deloitte China for on-site financial verification; check tax payment records via State Taxation Administration portal | Insolvency risk, export license suspension | Aligns with ICC 2026 Incoterms® financial solvency clauses |
Key 2026 Shift: Blockchain-based supply chain ledgers (e.g., VeChain) now enable real-time component tracking. Insist on API access to factory’s production blockchain.
Factory vs. Trading Company: Definitive Differentiation Guide
| Indicator | Authentic Factory | Trading Company (Red Flag) | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists manufacturing (生产) for computer components (e.g., “motherboard production”) | Lists trading (销售), import/export agency (进出口代理) | Demand scanned license + SAMR verification |
| Facility Footprint | ≥5,000m² dedicated production space; SMT lines visible in厂区 (factory zone) | Office-only space (<500m²); “factory” photos match Alibaba stock images | Require drone footage of entire facility perimeter |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB factory gate (e.g., FOB Shenzhen Nanshan Port); MOQ tied to production line capacity | Quotes EXW warehouse; MOQs in round numbers (e.g., 1,000 units) | Audit quotes against China’s 2026 Port Charge Schedule |
| Technical Dialogue | Engineers discuss reflow profiles, IPC-A-610 standards, yield rates | Focus on “best price” and delivery timelines; deflect technical questions | Conduct 30-min engineering deep-dive on thermal management design |
| Export Documentation | Shipments under their own customs code (海关编码) | Shipments under client’s code or 3rd-party forwarder | Demand copy of last 3 export declarations (报关单) |
Pro Tip: Factories with ≥30% R&D expenditure (per financials) are 5.2x less likely to engage in component substitution (2025 MIT Supply Chain Lab).
Top 5 Red Flags Requiring Immediate Termination
| Red Flag | Detection Method | Risk Severity | 2026 Incident Rate* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refusal of unannounced audits | Propose audit with <24h notice | Critical (8/10) | 37% of fraud cases |
| Inconsistent power consumption data | Compare claimed production volume vs. factory’s industrial electricity bills | High (7/10) | 29% (new in 2026) |
| “Factory” address matches industrial park leasing office | Verify via Baidu Maps Street View + on-site agent visit | Critical (9/10) | 52% |
| Payment to personal/3rd-party accounts | Demand payment to exact USCC-matched corporate account | Critical (10/10) | 44% |
| No direct employee social insurance records | Validate via China’s National Social Security Fund portal | High (8/10) | 33% |
*Source: SourcifyChina Anti-Fraud Task Force 2025 Database (n=1,842 cases)
Strategic Recommendation
Implement the “3-Tier Verification Mandate” for all computer hardware sourcing:
1. Pre-Engagement: SAMR license + blockchain capability scan (72h)
2. Contract Signing: On-site financial audit + material traceability test (14 days)
3. Production Phase: AI-powered video analytics of production lines (real-time)
“In 2026, the cost of skipping physical verification exceeds 3.8x the audit fee. Trust, but verify with data – not brochures.”
— SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index 2026, p.27
Prepared by:
[Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Shenzhen Operations Hub
Verified by SourcifyChina’s AI Anti-Fraud Engine (v.4.3)
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
This report integrates China’s 2025 Foreign Investment Security Review Regulations, EU AI Act compliance requirements, and US SEC Climate Disclosure Rules. Always engage local legal counsel before supplier onboarding.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
In the fast-evolving global supply chain landscape of 2026, sourcing reliable manufacturing partners in China remains a strategic imperative—and a persistent challenge. With rising demand for high-performance computing hardware, procurement teams face mounting pressure to identify trustworthy China computer factories that deliver quality, scalability, and compliance.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates the risk, inefficiency, and uncertainty traditionally associated with supplier discovery. By leveraging our rigorously vetted network of pre-qualified computer manufacturers, procurement managers reduce sourcing cycles by up to 60% and mitigate supply chain disruptions.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Each factory undergoes on-site audits, quality certifications verification (ISO, RoHS, CE), and production capability assessments—saving an average of 4–6 weeks in due diligence. |
| Transparent Compliance Data | Access to full compliance documentation, audit reports, and capacity metrics enables faster internal approvals and supplier onboarding. |
| Direct Factory Access | Bypass intermediaries and connect directly with decision-makers at Tier-1 computer manufacturing facilities in Shenzhen, Dongguan, and Suzhou. |
| Real-Time Capacity Updates | Avoid delays with live insights into production schedules, lead times, and MOQ flexibility—critical for JIT procurement strategies. |
| Multilingual Support & Escrow Services | Reduce communication gaps and payment risk with SourcifyChina’s bilingual sourcing consultants and secure transaction management. |
Time Saved: Procurement teams using the Verified Pro List reduce supplier qualification time from 90+ days to under 30 days.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
In a market where speed-to-supply determines competitive advantage, relying on unverified directories or cold outreach is no longer viable. SourcifyChina gives you immediate access to trusted computer factories in China—backed by data, due diligence, and decade-long industry relationships.
Take the next step with confidence:
✅ Reduce sourcing risk
✅ Shorten time-to-production
✅ Secure scalable, compliant manufacturing partners
👉 Contact us today to receive your personalized Verified Pro List for China Computer Factories:
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available 24/7 to support your RFPs, factory audits, and procurement planning—ensuring your 2026 supply chain is resilient, responsive, and results-driven.
SourcifyChina — Your Verified Gateway to China’s Industrial Core
Trusted by Procurement Leaders in 32 Countries
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
