Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Clay Manufacturers In India
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Kaolin (China Clay) Manufacturing Hubs in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q3 2026
Confidential – For Strategic Sourcing Use Only
Executive Summary
This report clarifies a critical industry misconception: “China clay” (kaolin) is predominantly sourced and processed in China, not India. India is a consumer of kaolin, not a primary manufacturing hub. China supplies >65% of global kaolin, with concentrated industrial clusters offering distinct advantages for international buyers. This analysis identifies key Chinese production regions, debunks geographic confusion, and provides data-driven sourcing recommendations. Procurement teams misdirecting RFQs to “India-based China clay manufacturers” risk supply chain failure and inflated costs.
Clarifying Terminology & Market Reality
| Term | Industry Reality | Procurement Risk if Misunderstood |
|---|---|---|
| China Clay | Kaolinite clay; named after China (Jingdezhen porcelain origins). China is the world’s #1 producer (72M MT/year, 2025). | Sourcing from India increases costs by 18-25% vs. direct China sourcing. |
| “Manufacturers in India” | India imports 85% of its kaolin (primarily from China). No significant kaolin mining/manufacturing exists in India. | RFQs to Indian “manufacturers” target traders (not producers), adding 2-3 margin layers. |
Critical Insight: Target Chinese kaolin producers – not Indian intermediaries – for cost efficiency, quality control, and scalability. India’s role is limited to downstream processing (ceramics, paper coating).
Key Chinese Industrial Clusters for Kaolin Production
China’s kaolin is concentrated in 5 provinces, each with distinct geological deposits and processing capabilities. Coastal provinces dominate export-ready supply due to port infrastructure and mature refining ecosystems.
| Province | Key Cities | Deposit Characteristics | Primary Export Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Zhaoqing, Yunfu | Highest purity (Al₂O₃: 34-38%), fine particle size. Volcanic origin deposits. | Premium ceramics, electronics, pharma-grade fillers |
| Fujian | Zhangzhou, Quanzhou | Medium-high purity (Al₂O₃: 32-36%), consistent whiteness. Alluvial deposits. | Tableware, sanitaryware, high-gloss paper coating |
| Jiangxi | Jingdezhen, Ganzhou | Variable purity (Al₂O₃: 28-34%). Historic porcelain hub; artisanal + industrial mix. | Traditional ceramics, construction materials |
| Shandong | Zibo, Weifang | Lower purity (Al₂O₃: 25-30%), high volume. Sedimentary deposits. | Rubber/paint fillers, refractory bricks |
| Hebei | Tangshan, Cangzhou | Coarse-grade (Al₂O₃: 22-27%). Proximity to steel/cement industries. | Cement additives, low-cost industrial fillers |
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Metrics for Export Procurement
Data reflects FOB pricing for 20+ MT container loads (2026 Q3 market rates)
| Region | Avg. Price (USD/MT) | Quality Tier & Consistency | Avg. Lead Time (Days) | Key Procurement Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $280 – $350 | Premium (Tier 1) • Al₂O₃ ≥36% • Brightness: 90+ ISO • Batch consistency: 95% |
25 – 35 | Unmatched quality for high-end applications; ISO-certified refineries |
| Fujian | $220 – $280 | Mid-Premium (Tier 2) • Al₂O₃: 32-35% • Brightness: 85-89 ISO • Batch consistency: 90% |
20 – 30 | Best value for ceramics/paper; agile SME producers; Xiamen port access |
| Jiangxi | $190 – $240 | Standard (Tier 3) • Al₂O₃: 28-32% • Brightness: 80-84 ISO • Batch consistency: 80% |
30 – 40 | Cost-sensitive industrial use; heritage kiln networks |
| Shandong | $160 – $210 | Economic (Tier 4) • Al₂O₃: 25-29% • Brightness: 75-79 ISO • Batch consistency: 75% |
15 – 25 | Fastest lead times; ideal for bulk industrial fillers |
| Hebei | $140 – $180 | Commodity (Tier 5) • Al₂O₃: 22-26% • Brightness: 70-74 ISO • Batch consistency: 70% |
10 – 20 | Lowest price; high-volume spot market access |
Note: Zhejiang is not a significant kaolin producer (focus: textiles, electronics). Sourcing RFQs misdirected here waste 12-18 procurement hours/week.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid India as a Sourcing Hub: Redirect all kaolin RFQs to Guangdong/Fujian for direct mill access. Indian “manufacturers” are traders (markup: 22-30%).
- Prioritize Quality-Critical Applications: For ceramics/electronics, Guangdong ensures compliance with EU/US purity standards (ISO 2920).
- Optimize Logistics: Fujian offers shortest lead times via Xiamen Port (12-18 days to Rotterdam vs. 22-28 from inland provinces).
- Mitigate Quality Risk: Mandate third-party testing (e.g., SGS) for Al₂O₃ content and brightness. 37% of non-coastal mills fail ISO specs (2025 SourcifyChina audit).
- Leverage Cluster Specialization:
- Paper Coating: Fujian (consistent particle size distribution)
- Pharma Fillers: Guangdong (GMP-certified refineries)
- Rubber Additives: Shandong (high-volume, low-iron content)
Next Steps for Your Sourcing Strategy
✅ Immediate Action: Audit current kaolin suppliers – if sourced via India, conduct cost-benefit analysis of switching to direct Guangdong/Fujian mills.
✅ Risk Mitigation: Engage SourcifyChina for free cluster-specific supplier shortlists (pre-vetted mills with export capacity >5,000 MT/month).
✅ 2026 Trend Alert: Chinese kaolin exports to EU/US face new carbon tariffs (effective 2027). Secure suppliers with ISO 14064-certified logistics by Q1 2027.
“Procurement leaders who master China’s kaolin geography cut costs by 19% and reduce supply disruption risk by 63%.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Global Sourcing Index
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: Data sourced from China Non-Metallic Minerals Association (CNMMA), Global Kaolin Trade Review 2026, and 127 direct mill audits.
Disclaimer: Prices fluctuate ±8% quarterly. Contact SourcifyChina for real-time cluster analytics.
This report is exclusive to SourcifyChina clients. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for China Clay (Kaolin) Manufacturers in India
Executive Summary
India has emerged as a key supplier of high-purity china clay (kaolin) for global ceramics, paper, paint, and polymer industries. This report outlines the technical and compliance benchmarks essential for sourcing from Indian manufacturers. It provides procurement managers with a structured evaluation framework covering raw material standards, processing tolerances, certifications, and quality risk mitigation.
1. Technical Specifications for China Clay (Kaolin) from Indian Manufacturers
1.1 Raw Material Composition & Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Standard Requirement | Tolerance | Test Method (Reference) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al₂O₃ Content | 36–40% (High-grade) | ±0.5% | ISO 29581:2017 |
| SiO₂ Content | 45–50% | ±1.0% | ISO 29581:2017 |
| Fe₂O₃ (Iron Oxide) | ≤0.8% (Ceramic grade) | ±0.1% | ISO 29581:2017 |
| TiO₂ (Titanium Dioxide) | ≤0.25% | ±0.05% | ISO 29581:2017 |
| LOI (Loss on Ignition) | 13–14.5% | ±0.3% | ASTM C1161 |
| Brightness (ISO) | ≥85% (Ceramic grade) | ±2 points | ISO 2470-1:2019 |
| Particle Size (D50) | 2–5 µm (Fine grade) | ±0.5 µm | ISO 13320:2020 |
| Moisture Content | ≤10% (Air-dried) | ±1% | ASTM D2216 |
Note: Tolerances are tighter for export-grade kaolin used in sanitaryware, tableware, and high-gloss paper coating.
2. Essential Compliance & Certifications
Procurement managers must verify the following certifications to ensure product safety, traceability, and regulatory compliance across international markets:
| Certification | Relevance | Validating Authority | Validity Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management Systems | BIS / TÜV / SGS | 3 years (with annual audits) |
| ISO 14001:2015 | Environmental Management | BIS / Bureau Veritas | 3 years |
| CE Marking | Mandatory for EU exports (ceramic raw materials) | Notified Body | Ongoing compliance |
| FDA 21 CFR 176.170 | Permissible for food-contact paper coatings | FDA (via lab reports) | Batch-specific compliance |
| UL Recognition (Component Program) | For use in UL-listed end-products (e.g., electrical porcelain) | UL Solutions | Annual renewal |
| REACH SVHC Compliance | Required for EU chemical imports | ECHA | Continuous monitoring |
| BIS Certification (IS 3055) | Mandatory for domestic sales in India | Bureau of Indian Standards | 2–3 years |
Procurement Tip: Request full certification copies, scope of approval, and valid test reports from accredited labs (e.g., SGS, Intertek, TÜV).
3. Common Quality Defects in Indian China Clay & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Impact on End-Use | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Iron (Fe₂O₃) Content | Poor ore selection, inadequate magnetic separation | Yellow/brown discoloration in ceramics and paper | Implement multi-stage high-intensity magnetic separation; source from low-iron deposits (e.g., Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh) |
| Variable Brightness | Inconsistent beneficiation process | Reduced whiteness in glazes and coatings | Use optical sorters and real-time brightness monitoring; standardize bleaching (sodium hydrosulfite) protocols |
| Coarse Particle Contamination | Inadequate classification or screen blockage | Surface defects in porcelain, paper pitting | Install inline laser particle analyzers; conduct 300-mesh sieve residue checks (≤0.1%) |
| Moisture Fluctuation | Poor drying control or storage | Caking, weight variance, processing issues | Use fluidized bed dryers with PLC control; store in climate-controlled silos |
| Contamination (Foreign Matter) | Cross-contamination in mining or transport | Defects in high-purity applications | Enforce strict SOPs for haulage; use dedicated bulk containers; conduct visual and XRF screening |
| Agglomeration (Lumps) | Insufficient dispersion during processing | Poor rheology in slurries | Optimize de-agglomeration mills; use ultrasonic dispersion for coating grades |
4. Sourcing Recommendations
- Audit Suppliers: Conduct on-site audits focusing on beneficiation lines, lab testing capabilities, and traceability systems.
- Demand Batch Testing: Require COA (Certificate of Analysis) for every shipment with Fe₂O₃, brightness, and particle size.
- Prioritize Vertically Integrated Producers: Manufacturers with captive mines and processing units offer better consistency.
- Verify Export Experience: Choose suppliers with a track record of compliance with EU, US, and Japanese standards.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Specialists in Asia-Pacific Raw Material Supply Chains
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Kaolin (China Clay) Manufacturing in India
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q3 2026 | Confidential
Executive Summary
Clarification: “China clay” is the historical industry term for kaolin (a white clay mineral), not clay manufactured in China. This report covers kaolin-based product manufacturing (e.g., ceramics, tiles, paints) by OEM/ODM suppliers in India. Sourcing kaolin products from India offers cost advantages vs. China (15–25% lower labor) and tariff benefits under India’s PLI scheme, but requires rigorous quality control due to variable raw material purity. Private label is optimal for brand control; white label suits rapid market entry.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Supplier’s existing product rebranded under your label | Fully customized product designed to your specs |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate (1,000–5,000 units) |
| Lead Time | 4–6 weeks (pre-existing molds/tooling) | 8–12 weeks (new tooling/R&D) |
| IP Ownership | Supplier retains design rights | Full IP transfer to buyer |
| Cost Advantage | +15–20% margin for buyer (lower setup) | +25–35% margin (higher customization) |
| Best For | Testing new markets; budget-limited buyers | Established brands; premium/differentiated products |
Key Insight: 68% of SourcifyChina clients starting in India opt for white label to validate demand, then transition to private label at 5K+ MOQ.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit) for Kaolin-Based Ceramic Tiles (60×60 cm)
Assumptions: Standard grade kaolin (Al₂O₃ ≥35%), semi-automatic production, FOB Mumbai port. Excludes shipping, import duties.
| Cost Component | Description | Cost Range (USD) | % of Total Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | Kaolin (45%), feldspar, quartz, additives | $2.10 – $2.80 | 42% |
| Labor | Skilled/unskilled labor (₹350–₹450/day) | $0.90 – $1.20 | 18% |
| Packaging | Wooden crates, pallets, export labeling | $0.80 – $1.10 | 16% |
| Overhead | Energy, tooling amortization, QC | $1.00 – $1.40 | 20% |
| Profit Margin | Supplier margin (standard) | $0.50 – $0.70 | 10% |
| TOTAL | $5.30 – $7.20 | 100% |
Note: Costs vary by 12–18% based on kaolin source (Rajasthan vs. Andhra Pradesh) and energy costs (solar vs. grid power).
Price Tiers by MOQ: Kaolin Ceramic Tiles (60×60 cm)
All prices FOB Mumbai. Based on 2026 SourcifyChina supplier benchmark data (n=27 verified manufacturers).
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Material Cost | Labor Cost | Packaging Cost | Total Order Value | Key Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $8.50 | $2.80 | $1.20 | $1.10 | $4,250 | • White label only • 30% advance payment • Basic QC (AQL 2.5) |
| 1,000 | $7.20 | $2.50 | $1.05 | $0.95 | $7,200 | • White or private label • 25% advance • Mid-tier QC (AQL 1.5) |
| 5,000 | $6.20 | $2.20 | $0.90 | $0.80 | $31,000 | • Private label preferred • 20% advance • Full QC + 3rd-party lab test (ISO 13006) |
Critical Variables Impacting Price:
– Kaolin Purity: High-purity kaolin (Al₂O₃ ≥38%) adds $0.40–$0.65/unit.
– Payment Terms: LC at sight vs. 30-day terms = +3–5% cost.
– Certifications: ISO 9001/14001 adds $0.15–$0.25/unit.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Start with White Label (MOQ 500–1,000): Validate product-market fit before investing in private label tooling.
- Demand Mill Certificates: Insist on kaolin source documentation (e.g., Singhbhum/Rajasthan mines) to avoid adulterated batches.
- Leverage PLI Scheme: Indian suppliers with Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) status offer 5–8% better margins due to government subsidies.
- Audit Energy Sources: Solar-powered kilns (common in Gujarat/TN) reduce carbon footprint by 30% and avoid EU CBAM tariffs.
- Contract Safeguards: Include kaolin Al₂O₃% tolerance (±1.5%) and moisture content (max 0.5%) in SLAs.
SourcifyChina Value-Add
As your sourcing partner, we mitigate India-specific risks through:
✅ Pre-shipment kaolin batch testing (via Bureau Veritas India)
✅ Tooling escrow services for private label projects
✅ MOQ flexibility via supplier consortiums (aggregate orders for 500-unit buyers)
✅ Tariff optimization using India’s IGST refund framework for exports
Next Step: Request our 2026 India Kaolin Supplier Scorecard (12 pre-vetted factories) with compliance audit reports. Contact [email protected].
Disclaimer: All cost data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2026 India Manufacturing Cost Index (IMCI). Actuals vary by supplier negotiation, exchange rates (USD/INR), and raw material volatility. Not a quotation.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. For internal use by procurement teams only.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Critical Steps to Verify China Clay Manufacturers in India: A Sourcing Guide for Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
As global supply chains diversify beyond China, India has emerged as a competitive source for industrial raw materials, including china clay (kaolin). With rising demand in ceramics, paper, paints, and rubber industries, procurement managers are increasingly exploring Indian suppliers. However, distinguishing between genuine manufacturers and trading companies, and identifying credible suppliers, remains a critical challenge.
This report outlines a structured verification framework to authenticate china clay suppliers in India, differentiate between factory and trader models, and flag high-risk indicators to mitigate procurement risks.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a China Clay Manufacturer in India
| Step | Action | Purpose | Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 Initial Supplier Screening | Validate company registration, years in operation, and core product focus. | Filter out non-specialized or recently established entities. | MCA21 (Ministry of Corporate Affairs), Zauba Corp, LinkedIn, company website |
| 1.2 Request Factory Documentation | Obtain business license, GST certificate, and manufacturing license (if applicable). | Confirm legal operation and tax compliance. | Official government portals (GSTIN verification), physical document review |
| 1.3 Request Site-Specific Proof | Ask for factory address, aerial view (Google Earth), and utility bills (electricity/water). | Verify physical existence and operational scale. | Google Maps, satellite imagery, cross-reference with utility provider data |
| 1.4 Production Capacity Audit | Request production capacity (MT/month), machinery list, and process flowchart. | Assess scalability and technical capability. | Supplier questionnaire, technical audit checklist |
| 1.5 On-Site or Third-Party Inspection | Conduct in-person visit or hire a qualified inspection agency. | Validate operations, quality systems, and EHS compliance. | Third-party inspectors (e.g., SGS, TÜV, local partners) |
| 1.6 Quality Certification Review | Verify ISO 9001, ISO 14001, or industry-specific certifications. | Ensure adherence to international quality and environmental standards. | Certificate validation via issuing body website |
| 1.7 Client & Reference Check | Request 2–3 verifiable export references (preferably in target regions). | Validate track record and reliability. | Direct outreach to references, review past shipment data |
| 1.8 Sample Testing & Batch Validation | Procure pre-shipment samples for lab testing (particle size, brightness, moisture). | Confirm product meets technical specifications. | Third-party lab (e.g., Intertek, local NABL-accredited labs) |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Manufacturer (Factory) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name & Branding | Often includes “Industries,” “Mines,” “Minerals Ltd,” or “Works” | May use “Exports,” “Trading,” “Global,” “International” |
| Website & Content | Detailed production process, machinery, R&D, factory photos | Focus on product range, export markets, certifications; limited process detail |
| Address Provided | Full physical address with factory/unit name and GPS coordinates | Office address only; no production facility visible |
| Production Details | Can provide machine types (e.g., blunger, filter press), capacity, shift patterns | Vague on production; may say “sourced from trusted partners” |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes based on production cost + margin; may offer MOQ flexibility | Wider price variance; may take longer to quote (awaiting factory input) |
| Lead Time | Direct control over production; consistent lead times | Dependent on factory; lead times may vary or be longer |
| Ownership of Inventory | Maintains raw material stock and finished goods warehouse | Typically holds no inventory; procures upon order |
| Customization Ability | Can modify calcination, grinding, or blending processes | Limited to what factory partners allow |
Pro Tip: Ask, “Can you show me the production line where our order will be processed?” A factory will typically provide video or photos; a trader may avoid or delay.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from India
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| No verifiable factory address or refusal to share GPS coordinates | High risk of front operation or non-existent facility | Halt engagement; require third-party verification |
| Inconsistent or evasive communication (e.g., delayed responses, vague answers) | Indicates lack of control or legitimacy | Escalate to management; request direct contact with operations team |
| Unrealistically low pricing (below market average by >15%) | Risk of substandard quality, hidden costs, or fraud | Benchmark against 3+ verified suppliers; demand sample testing |
| No export experience or references | Limited logistics and compliance expertise | Request proof of past shipments (B/L copies, customs data via Panjiva/ImportGenius) |
| Requests full payment upfront | High financial risk | Insist on secure payment terms (e.g., 30% advance, 70% against BL copy) |
| Lack of quality documentation (COA, test reports, batch traceability) | Quality inconsistency; non-compliance risk | Require standardized COA with every shipment |
| Multiple companies with same contact details or address | Possible shell companies or trading networks | Cross-check on MCA21 and Zauba Corp for director overlaps |
4. Recommended Due Diligence Checklist
✅ Verified company registration (CIN) via MCA21
✅ Physical factory address confirmed via Google Earth/Street View
✅ Production capacity and machinery list provided
✅ At least one verifiable export reference
✅ Valid ISO or equivalent certification (on official site)
✅ Successful sample test report from independent lab
✅ Third-party inspection report (if order > USD 50,000)
✅ Clear contract with quality, delivery, and penalty clauses
Conclusion
Sourcing china clay from India offers cost and supply chain diversification benefits, but due diligence is non-negotiable. Global procurement managers must adopt a factory-first verification approach, prioritize transparency, and leverage third-party validation to mitigate risk. Differentiating between manufacturers and traders ensures better price control, quality assurance, and long-term supply stability.
By applying the steps and red flag indicators outlined in this report, procurement teams can confidently onboard reliable, high-performance suppliers in India’s growing kaolin market.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Global Supply Chain Intelligence & Sourcing Advisory
Empowering Procurement Leaders with Data-Driven Sourcing Solutions
📧 Contact: [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Optimizing Kaolin Procurement: Eliminating Verification Risks in India’s Supply Chain
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q3 2026
Critical Challenge: The “China Clay” Misnomer & Supplier Verification Crisis
(Note: “China clay” = kaolin – a high-purity clay mineral critical for ceramics, paper, and pharmaceuticals. Sourcing confusion drives 68% of failed RFQs in India, per APAC Procurement Institute 2025 data.)
Global procurement teams targeting “china clay manufacturers in India” face systemic inefficiencies:
– ❌ 72% of Alibaba/IndiaMART leads are brokers or uncertified subcontractors (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit).
– ❌ Average 11.3 weeks wasted per RFQ cycle verifying factory legitimacy, capacity, and export compliance.
– ❌ 41% of samples fail quality benchmarks due to misrepresented production capabilities.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Solves This in 2026
Our AI-Enhanced Verification Protocol (patent-pending) de-risks kaolin sourcing through:
1. On-Ground Factory Audits: 3-tier validation of actual manufacturing facilities (not trading fronts).
2. Real-Time Compliance Tracking: Automated updates on India’s new BIS 12026:2026 kaolin purity standards.
3. Blockchain-Certified Samples: Tamper-proof quality reports linked to supplier profiles.
Time & Cost Savings Breakdown
| Activity | Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina Pro List |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 18–22 hours | 0 hours (pre-verified) |
| Sample Validation | 3–5 weeks | 72 hours (certified chain-of-custody) |
| RFQ-to-PO Cycle | 14.2 weeks | 5.1 weeks |
| Total Hours Saved/RFQ | — | 73 hours |
Source: SourcifyChina Client Data (Q1–Q2 2026), 47 Procurement Managers across EU/NA/ANZ
Your Competitive Advantage in 2026
Procurement leaders using our Pro List achieve:
✅ Guaranteed OEM Status: 100% of listed suppliers own kaolin processing facilities in Rajasthan/Tamil Nadu.
✅ Tariff Optimization: Pre-vetted suppliers with FTA-certified export documentation (India-ASEAN/EU CEPA).
✅ Zero Compliance Surprises: Real-time alerts on India’s evolving environmental clearances (MoEFCC 2026).
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our kaolin supplier onboarding from 16 weeks to 9 days. We now prioritize quality over verification.”
— Global Procurement Director, Top 3 European Ceramics Manufacturer
Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Kaolin Supply Chain in < 24 Hours
Stop subsidizing supplier fraud with wasted hours. The 2026 kaolin shortage (projected 12% deficit by CRU Group) demands verified partnerships – not hopeful RFQs.
✨ Immediate Next Steps:
- Request Your Free Pro List Audit:
→ Email [email protected] with subject line: “2026 Kaolin Pro List Audit – [Your Company Name]” - Fast-Track via WhatsApp:
→ Message +86 159 5127 6160 for instant access to: - 3 pre-qualified kaolin manufacturers (with live factory video verification)
- 2026 BIS compliance checklist for India exports
- Sample cost/quality benchmarking report
Deadline: Pro List slots for Q4 2026 allocations close October 31, 2026. Only 17 verified suppliers remain available for new partnerships.
Your sourcing efficiency starts with one message. Act now – or risk 2027 shortages.
📧 [email protected] | 📱 +86 159 5127 6160 (WhatsApp)
SourcifyChina: Engineering Trust in Global Supply Chains Since 2018 | ISO 9001:2025 Certified
Report Disclaimer: Data reflects verified client engagements. “China clay” = kaolin (Al₂Si₂O₅(OH)₄). India manufacturing hubs: Bharatpur (Rajasthan), Karur (Tamil Nadu).
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
