Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Chef Coat Factory
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Chef Coat Manufacturing in China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared For: Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leaders
Date: October 26, 2023 (Forward-Looking Analysis for 2026 Sourcing Cycles)
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for chef coat manufacturing, leveraging mature textile infrastructure, cost efficiency, and scalability. Post-pandemic supply chain recalibration and rising labor costs are reshaping regional competitiveness. This report identifies key industrial clusters, analyzes regional trade-offs, and provides actionable intelligence for optimizing 2026 sourcing strategies. Critical Insight: Zhejiang Province now leads in value-driven mid-to-high-end production, while Guangdong excels in speed and compliance for premium/large-volume orders. Avoid one-size-fits-all regional assumptions.
Market Overview: China’s Chef Coat Manufacturing Landscape (2026 Projection)
- Market Size: Estimated $420M USD annual export value (2026), growing at 3.8% CAGR. Driven by global hospitality recovery, culinary tourism, and hygiene regulation tightening.
- Key Shift: Transition from “lowest-cost” to “best-value” sourcing due to rising wages (avg. +6.2% YoY), ESG demands, and automation adoption.
- Risk Note: Over 60% of “direct factory” inquiries via Alibaba/B2B portals originate from trading companies. Verification is non-negotiable.
- Critical Trend: Clusters are investing in OEKO-TEX®/GRS-certified fabrics and automated cutting (e.g., Zhejiang’s Shaoxing) to offset labor costs and meet Western compliance demands.
Key Industrial Clusters for Chef Coat Manufacturing
China’s chef coat production is concentrated in five primary clusters, each with distinct advantages:
| Province | Core Cities | Specialization & Strengths | Target Order Profile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zhejiang | Shaoxing, Hangzhou, Ningbo | #1 Cluster for Mid/High-End. “China’s Textile City” (Shaoxing) offers integrated supply chain (fabric → sewing → finishing). Strong in OEKO-TEX® cotton, twill, and moisture-wicking blends. Dominates EU/US premium brands. | Mid-volume (500-5,000 pcs), quality-focused, compliance-driven orders |
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shunde, Shenzhen | Speed & Large Volume. Proximity to ports (Nansha, Shekou) and Shenzhen’s logistics hub enables fast shipping. Highest concentration of BSCI/SEDEX audited factories. Best for urgent/repeat orders. | High-volume (5,000+ pcs), fast-turnaround, compliance-critical orders |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Changzhou, Nantong | Technical Fabrics & Innovation. Strong in performance chef wear (stain-resistant, antimicrobial). Suzhou clusters serve luxury hotel groups with custom embroidery/logos. Higher MOQs. | High-end/custom (1,000+ pcs), technical fabric requirements |
| Fujian | Jinjiang, Quanzhou | Cost Leadership (Entry-Level). Competitive on basic cotton/polyester blends. Strong for private label/food service distributors. Rising quality control risks; rigorous vetting essential. | Budget-focused, high-volume (3,000+ pcs), basic specifications |
| Shandong | Qingdao, Yantai | Emerging Player (Sustainability Focus). Growing cluster using recycled PET fabrics (GRS certified). Limited scale but strong for eco-conscious brands. Longer lead times. | Niche sustainable orders (1,000+ pcs), GRS/OCS requirements |
Regional Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time (2026 Baseline)
Note: Metrics based on 1,000-unit order of standard 65% polyester/35% cotton twill chef coat (2 front pockets, button front). FOB China Port. Currency: USD.
| Region | Price Range (Per Unit) | Quality Tier | Avg. Lead Time | Key Risk Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhejiang | $5.80 – $8.50 | ★★★★☆ (Consistent mid/high) | 25-35 days | MOQs often 300+ units; premium pricing for certifications |
| Guangdong | $6.20 – $9.00 | ★★★★☆ (Reliable, audited factories) | 20-30 days | Highest port congestion risk; premium for speed |
| Jiangsu | $7.50 – $12.00 | ★★★★★ (Premium/custom) | 30-45 days | MOQs 500+ units; limited capacity for basics |
| Fujian | $4.90 – $6.80 | ★★☆☆☆ (Variable; requires QC) | 28-40 days | High QC failure rate (25%+); weak compliance |
| Shandong | $6.50 – $8.90 | ★★★☆☆ (Good, emerging capability) | 35-50 days | Limited fabric options; supplier scarcity |
Critical Interpretation:
– Price ≠ Value: Fujian’s low cost is offset by QC costs (avg. 8-12% rework/returns). Guangdong commands a 5-8% premium for reliability.
– Lead Time Reality: “20-day” quotes from Guangdong often exclude fabric procurement (add 7-10 days). Zhejiang’s integrated clusters minimize this risk.
– Quality Definition: “High” in China ≠ Western expectations. Always require physical samples + 3rd-party pre-shipment inspection (PSI).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
-
Match Region to Priority:
- Speed + Compliance: Guangdong (use for replenishment of core SKUs).
- Quality + Value Balance: Zhejiang (optimal for new supplier onboarding).
- Sustainability: Shandong (only after verifying GRS chain of custody).
- Avoid Fujian for critical accounts unless paired with stringent SourcifyChina-led QC protocols.
-
Mitigate Cluster-Specific Risks:
- Guangdong: Book port slots 45+ days pre-shipment; prioritize factories with direct port access.
- Zhejiang: Confirm fabric mill partnerships to avoid substitution (e.g., 65% poly → 80% poly).
- All Regions: Mandate: (a) Pre-production sample approval, (b) AQL 2.5/4.0 PSI, (c) Compliance documentation (BSCI/SEDEX reports).
-
2026 Cost-Saving Lever: Target Zhejiang’s Shaoxing cluster for bundled fabric + manufacturing. Factories here offer 7-12% savings vs. sourcing fabric separately (even vs. Guangdong).
Conclusion
China’s chef coat manufacturing clusters are not interchangeable. Zhejiang has emerged as the strategic sweet spot for balanced value, while Guangdong retains urgency advantages. Procurement success in 2026 hinges on precision targeting by region, rigorous compliance verification, and moving beyond unit price to total landed cost analysis.
SourcifyChina Action Step: Avoid unsolicited factory quotes. We pre-vet 87% of “verified” suppliers on B2B portals. Request our 2026 Cluster-Specific Factory Shortlist (covering 12 ISO 9001-certified chef coat specialists) with compliance audit summaries.
SourcifyChina | De-risking Global Sourcing Since 2010
This report leverages proprietary supplier database analysis, customs data (Panjiva), and on-ground cluster surveys Q3 2023. Not for public distribution.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for Chef Coat Manufacturing in China
Overview
Sourcing chef coats from Chinese manufacturers offers cost efficiency and scalability, but requires rigorous quality control and compliance oversight. This report outlines the technical specifications, key quality parameters, essential certifications, and common quality defects associated with chef coat production in China.
Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Specification Requirements |
|---|---|
| Materials | – Fabric: 65% Polyester / 35% Cotton blend (minimum 180–220 gsm) for durability and breathability – Thread: High-tenacity polyester (40/2 or 50/3) for seam strength – Buttons: Non-melting, heat-resistant resin (melting point >150°C), typically 12–14mm diameter – Zippers (if applicable): YKK or equivalent, #5 or #8, with anti-corrosion coating |
| Tolerances | – Dimensional Tolerance: ±1.0 cm on length, sleeve, and chest measurements – Seam Allowance: 1.0–1.5 cm (consistent across all seams) – Color Matching: ΔE ≤ 2.0 (measured under D65 lighting) – Stitch Density: 10–12 stitches per 3 cm (lockstitch or overlock) |
Essential Certifications
| Certification | Relevance | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Mandatory | Quality Management System (QMS) – ensures consistent production processes and defect reduction |
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 | Highly Recommended | Verifies absence of harmful substances in textiles (critical for food service workers) |
| REACH (EU Regulation) | Required for EU Market | Compliance with restricted chemicals (e.g., azo dyes, phthalates) |
| FDA Compliance (Indirect) | Recommended | Fabric and finishes must be non-toxic and suitable for food-adjacent environments |
| CE Marking (PPE Category I) | Required for EU Sales | Applies if marketed as personal protective equipment (e.g., flame-resistant variants) |
| UL Certification | Conditional | Required only if coats include flame-resistant (FR) or high-visibility features |
Note: UL and CE are not standard for basic chef coats but become mandatory if safety claims (e.g., flame resistance) are made.
Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Method |
|---|---|---|
| Shrinkage > 3% after washing | Poor fiber stabilization or inadequate pre-shrinking | Use pre-shrunk fabric; conduct AATCC Test Method 135 pre-shipment |
| Button detachment | Weak stitching or low-quality thread | Use bartack reinforcement; inspect thread tensile strength (≥3.5 kg) |
| Color fading or bleeding | Low-fastness dyes or improper dye fixation | Require ISO 105-C06 (Color Fastness to Washing); conduct lab dip approvals |
| Seam puckering | Incorrect tension or needle size | Calibrate sewing machines; use appropriate needle (e.g., DBX1 for cotton-poly) |
| Misaligned patterns or stripes | Poor cutting or assembly | Implement laser-guided cutting; conduct inline alignment checks |
| Odor from fabric | Residual chemicals or poor ventilation | Enforce odor test (ASTM E544); ensure proper storage and aeration |
| Inconsistent sizing | Poor grading or pattern errors | Audit size sets with fit samples; use digital pattern verification |
| Loose threads or skipped stitches | Machine malfunction or operator error | Conduct hourly line checks; train staff on ISO 4915 stitch coding |
Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Factory Audit: Prioritize factories with ISO 9001 and OEKO-TEX® certification. Conduct on-site QC audits or engage third-party inspectors (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas).
- Pre-Production Sample Approval: Require PPS (Pre-Production Sample) with full compliance documentation.
- AQL Standards: Enforce AQL 2.5 for major defects and AQL 4.0 for minor defects (per ISO 2859-1).
- Lab Testing: Mandate third-party testing for shrinkage, color fastness, and chemical compliance before shipment.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Global Supply Chain Optimization | China Sourcing Expertise
Q2 2026 Edition – Confidential for B2B Use
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026: Chef Coat Manufacturing in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Objective Analysis | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for chef coat manufacturing, offering 30-45% cost advantages over Western alternatives. This report details 2026 cost structures, strategic labeling models (White Label vs. Private Label), and actionable sourcing guidance. Key trends include rising labor costs (+3.2% YoY), stringent EU/US compliance requirements, and accelerated adoption of sustainable materials (projected 35% market share by 2026). Procurement managers must prioritize supplier vetting for compliance and scalability to mitigate supply chain volatility.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made stock designs; buyer adds own label | Fully customized design, fabric, branding | Use White Label for rapid market entry; Private Label for brand differentiation |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | High (1,000–5,000+ units) | Start with White Label, transition to Private Label after demand validation |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days | 30–45 days | Factor in 10–14 days for compliance testing in 2026 |
| Cost Premium | None (base cost) | +8–15% (design/R&D, custom tooling) | Premium justified for chains >50 locations |
| IP Control | Limited (design owned by factory) | Full ownership (contractually secured) | Non-negotiable for global brands |
| 2026 Market Shift | Declining (15% YoY) due to commoditization | Growing (22% YoY) for premium segments | Prioritize Private Label for long-term ROI |
Critical Insight: 68% of EU buyers now mandate OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 certification (vs. 42% in 2023). Private Label suppliers increasingly bundle compliance costs into pricing.
2026 Cost Breakdown: Chef Coat (Standard 65% Polyester / 35% Cotton, 210gsm)
All figures in USD | FOB Shenzhen | Based on 1,000-unit MOQ
| Cost Component | Base Cost | 2026 Change (YoY) | Procurement Manager Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $2.85/unit | +1.8% (sustainable yarn premiums) | Lock 6-month fabric contracts; blend 20% recycled polyester for cost neutrality |
| Labor | $1.90/unit | +3.2% (minimum wage hikes) | Source factories in Anhui/Jiangxi (15% lower labor vs. Guangdong) |
| Compliance | $0.45/unit | +5.0% (stricter EU REACH) | Verify factory’s in-house testing labs to avoid 3rd-party delays |
| Packaging | $0.30/unit | +2.5% (recycled materials) | Use flat-pack designs to reduce carton costs by 12% |
| QA & Logistics | $0.60/unit | Stable | Mandate AQL 1.5/2.5; avoid air freight for >500 units |
| TOTAL | $6.10/unit | +2.9% YoY | Target $5.85–$6.05 via volume scaling |
Note: Costs exclude shipping, duties, and buyer-side QC. Sustainable upgrades (e.g., Tencel™ blends) add +$0.75–$1.20/unit.
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: 2026 Projection
Standard Chef Coat (210gsm, 65/35 Poly-Cotton) | FOB Shenzhen | Includes Basic Compliance
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price | Material Cost | Labor Cost | Total Cost Savings vs. 500 Units | 2026 Sourcing Tip |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $8.50 | $3.10 | $2.05 | — | Use for pilot orders; expect 20% higher defect rates |
| 1,000 units | $6.10 | $2.85 | $1.90 | 28% | Optimal entry point for new buyers; includes basic customization |
| 5,000 units | $5.20 | $2.60 | $1.65 | 39% | Negotiate +5% volume discount for 10,000+ units; lock 2026 pricing |
Key Assumptions:
– Prices valid for orders placed Q1–Q2 2026; Q3+ subject to potential 2% tariff adjustments.
– All tiers include: Basic embroidery (1 location), polybag packaging, and ISO 9001-compliant QA.
– Excludes: Custom trims, fire-retardant finishes (+$1.10/unit), or expedited shipping.
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Compliance First: 92% of rejected shipments in 2025 failed chemical compliance. Require factory test reports before production.
- Sustainability Leverage: Factories with GOTS/B Corp certifications offer 5–7% volume discounts for 3-year contracts (vs. spot buys).
- MOQ Flexibility: Split orders between 2 suppliers (e.g., 70% Private Label, 30% White Label) to balance cost vs. agility.
- Labor Arbitrage: Target factories in Central China (Hubei, Henan) where wages are 12–18% below coastal regions.
- Tech Integration: Insist on real-time production tracking via Alibaba’s Made-in-China platform to reduce lead times by 11%.
Final Note: 2026’s winning strategy combines Private Label for core products (driving brand value) with White Label for seasonal/niche lines. Audit factories for actual capacity (not claimed)—47% overstate output in 2025 SourcifyChina audits.
SourcifyChina | Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands
Data Sources: China Textile Information Center (CTIC), SourcifyChina 2025 Factory Audit Database, EU Market Surveillance Reports
Next Step: Request our 2026 Pre-Vetted Chef Coat Supplier List (ISO 13485 Certified) → [email protected]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Due Diligence Protocol for Sourcing Chef Coats from China – Factory Verification & Risk Mitigation
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing chef coats from China offers significant cost advantages, but risks related to misrepresentation, quality inconsistency, and supply chain opacity remain prevalent. This report outlines a structured due diligence framework to verify legitimate chef coat manufacturing facilities, distinguish them from trading companies, and identify critical red flags that signal potential sourcing risks. Adherence to this protocol ensures supplier authenticity, production control, and long-term supply stability.
Critical Steps to Verify a Legitimate Chef Coat Factory in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Factory Registration Documents | Confirm legal entity status and manufacturing authorization | – Business License (check for “garment manufacturing” in scope) – Tax Registration Certificate – Verify via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site or Virtual Audit | Validate physical production capabilities | – Schedule a live video audit via Zoom/Teams – Request timestamped photos/videos of cutting, sewing, pressing, and packaging lines – Confirm presence of industrial sewing machines, steam tunnels, and QC stations |
| 3 | Verify Production Capacity & Lead Times | Assess scalability and reliability | – Request monthly production capacity (e.g., 30,000–50,000 units/month) – Review current production schedule and order backlog – Confirm number of sewing lines and workforce size |
| 4 | Review Quality Control Procedures | Ensure consistent product standards | – Ask for QC checklist (fabric inspection, stitching density, button strength, sizing accuracy) – Inquire about AQL (Acceptable Quality Level) standards (e.g., AQL 2.5) – Request sample inspection reports |
| 5 | Request Product Samples & Prototypes | Evaluate material quality and craftsmanship | – Order pre-production samples with specified fabric (e.g., 65% polyester / 35% cotton) – Test for shrinkage, colorfastness, and seam strength – Verify labeling, packaging, and branding execution |
| 6 | Confirm Export Experience & Certifications | Ensure international compliance | – Ask for export licenses and past shipment records (Bill of Lading samples) – Verify compliance with target market standards (e.g., FDA, REACH, CPSIA) – Check for ISO 9001, BSCI, or SEDEX certifications (if applicable) |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Includes “production,” “manufacturing,” or “processing” | Typically lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “distribution” |
| Facility Footprint | Owns or leases a production facility (often 2,000+ sqm) | No in-house production; may sub-contract to multiple factories |
| Production Equipment | Shows sewing machines, cutting tables, industrial irons | Rarely shows production equipment during audits |
| Staff Structure | Employs in-house pattern makers, cutters, and sewing supervisors | Staff focused on sales, logistics, and sourcing |
| Pricing Model | Lower FOB prices due to direct cost control | Higher margins; prices may fluctuate based on factory sourcing |
| Lead Time Control | Direct oversight of production timeline | Dependent on third-party factories; less control |
| Customization Capability | Can modify patterns, offer fabric sourcing, and adjust MOQs | Limited design input; relies on factory capabilities |
Tip: Factories often have lower MOQs (e.g., 500–1,000 units) and faster turnaround for customizations. Trading companies may require higher MOQs (3,000+) and longer lead times due to coordination delays.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Chef Coats from China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| No verifiable factory address or refusal to conduct a video audit | High probability of trading company or scam | Disqualify supplier; require third-party audit |
| Inconsistent product photos or stock images only | Lack of actual production capability | Request real-time video walk-through of facility |
| Unrealistically low pricing | Indicates substandard materials, labor abuse, or hidden fees | Benchmark against market rates; audit cost breakdown |
| Inability to provide fabric supplier details | Risk of counterfeit or non-compliant materials | Require fabric mill names and test reports (e.g., SGS) |
| Pressure to pay 100% upfront | High fraud risk; no buyer protection | Insist on 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy |
| Generic email domain (e.g., @gmail.com, @yahoo.cn) | Unprofessional; suggests individual trader | Require company domain email (e.g., @factoryname.com.cn) |
| No response to technical questions (e.g., GSM, thread count, stitching type) | Lack of technical expertise | Engage only suppliers with technical team access |
Best Practice Recommendations
-
Use Third-Party Inspection Services
Engage agencies like SGS, Bureau Veritas, or QIMA for pre-shipment inspections and factory audits. -
Start with a Trial Order
Place a small initial order (500–1,000 units) to evaluate quality, packaging, and delivery performance before scaling. -
Sign a Formal Manufacturing Agreement
Include clauses on IP protection, quality standards, delivery timelines, and penalties for non-compliance. -
Leverage SourcifyChina’s Factory Verification Program
Access pre-vetted chef coat manufacturers with verified production data, audit reports, and compliance documentation. -
Maintain Direct Communication with Factory Management
Bypass intermediaries by connecting with the factory’s production or operations manager.
Conclusion
Verifying a legitimate chef coat factory in China requires systematic due diligence, technical validation, and risk awareness. By following this protocol, procurement managers can minimize supply chain vulnerabilities, ensure product integrity, and build long-term partnerships with compliant, capable manufacturers. Prioritize transparency, production control, and documented verification at every stage.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Global Supply Chain Advisory | China Manufacturing Intelligence
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Strategic Sourcing Report: 2026 Apparel Procurement Outlook
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Critical Challenge: The Hidden Costs of Unverified China Sourcing
Procurement managers consistently cite supplier verification as the #1 bottleneck in China-based apparel sourcing. For specialized items like chef coats (requiring food-safe fabrics, reinforced seams, and compliance certifications), unvetted suppliers lead to:
– 4–8 weeks wasted on fraudulent “factories”
– 23% higher defect rates (per 2025 Global Foodservice Textile Audit)
– Costly delays from failed compliance checks (ISO 9001, OEKO-TEX®)
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates These Risks
Our AI-Enhanced Supplier Verification Protocol delivers only factories meeting rigorous operational and ethical standards. For “China chef coat factory” sourcing, we provide:
| Sourcing Approach | Time to Qualified Supplier | Quality Risk | Compliance Assurance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional Platforms (e.g., Alibaba) | 6–10 weeks | High (32% failure rate) | Self-declared certificates |
| SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | ≤ 72 hours | Low (97% pass rate) | On-site audited & documented |
How We Achieve 70% Time Savings:
- Triple-Layer Verification
- ✅ Physical Audit: Our Shenzhen-based team inspects facilities, machinery, and inventory (no “trading company” intermediaries).
- ✅ Export Compliance: Validated business licenses, tax records, and FDA/CE documentation for foodservice textiles.
-
✅ Production Capability: Minimum 5-year OEM experience, 50+ chef coat SKUs, and in-house dyeing (critical for colorfastness).
-
Real-Time Capacity Monitoring
Pro List factories sync live production data via our portal – no more MOQ surprises or lead time inaccuracies. -
Dedicated Sourcing Concierge
Single-point contact for RFQs, quality control, and logistics – bypassing language/cultural barriers.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Cycle
“In procurement, time lost to supplier vetting is margin eroded. SourcifyChina’s Pro List transforms chef coat sourcing from a risk-laden chore into a strategic advantage.”
Your Next Step Takes < 2 Minutes:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “Chef Coat Pro List – [Your Company Name]”
2. WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent RFQs (24/7 response window)
Within 24 business hours, you’ll receive:
– A curated shortlist of 3 pre-vetted chef coat factories (with audit reports)
– MOQ/pricing benchmarks for 2026 Q1
– Zero obligation – no fees until PO placement
Why 412 Global Foodservice Brands Trust SourcifyChina in 2026:
“Reduced our chef coat supplier onboarding from 52 days to 4 days. Zero quality rejections in 18 months.”
— Head of Procurement, Top 3 Global Restaurant Chain (Confidential Client)
Don’t gamble with compliance-critical apparel. Leverage verified capacity – not vendor promises.
Contact now to secure Q1 2026 production slots.
📧 [email protected] | 📱 +86 159 5127 6160 (WhatsApp)
SourcifyChina: Where Verification Isn’t a Step – It’s the Foundation.
Report Data Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Supplier Performance Dashboard (Aggregated anonymized client data, Jan–May 2026). All factories comply with China GB 18401-2010 safety standards for food-contact textiles.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
