Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Chef Clothes Factory
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report:
Professional Culinary Apparel Manufacturing in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Executives | Q1 2026 Forecast
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for chef uniform manufacturing, accounting for 68% of worldwide production capacity (SourcifyChina 2025 Industry Survey). This report identifies key industrial clusters, analyzes regional differentials in cost, quality, and lead time, and provides strategic sourcing recommendations for procurement managers navigating post-pandemic supply chain dynamics. Critical trends for 2026 include accelerated automation adoption, rising compliance demands (FDA/EU 10/2023), and strategic regional shifts toward Central China for cost optimization.
Key Industrial Clusters Analysis
Chef uniform manufacturing is concentrated in three primary coastal clusters, with emerging capacity in Central China. Production is driven by textile infrastructure, port access, and specialized OEM expertise.
| Province | Core Cities | Specialization | Key Advantages | Volume Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Dongguan, Foshan, Guangzhou | High-volume export OEMs, technical fabrics (flame-resistant, moisture-wicking) | Proximity to Shenzhen/HK ports; 92% of factories certified for EU/US compliance; Strong R&D in sustainable textiles | 45% |
| Zhejiang | Shaoxing, Ningbo, Hangzhou | Mid-to-high-end cotton/polyester blends; Custom embroidery | Integrated textile ecosystem (yarn → dyeing → cut-make-trim); 37% lower water usage vs. national avg.; Digital printing hubs | 32% |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou | Premium organic cotton, luxury chef jackets | Higher skilled labor pool; 41% of factories with ISO 14001; Proximity to Shanghai design studios | 15% |
| Emerging | Hubei (Wuhan), Anhui (Hefei) | Basic uniform lines, cost-driven production | 18-22% lower labor costs; Government subsidies for inland FDI; 2026 infrastructure upgrades (Yangtze River ports) | 8% |
Strategic Note: Guangdong dominates compliance-critical orders (e.g., US/EU food service), while Zhejiang leads in design flexibility. Jiangsu commands a 15-20% price premium for luxury segments. Central China clusters remain high-risk for complex orders due to limited compliance infrastructure.
Regional Comparison: Production Metrics (2026 Projection)
Based on 200+ factory audits (SourcifyChina Q4 2025); Benchmark: 5,000-unit order of standard 2-piece cotton/polyester chef uniform set
| Metric | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Jiangsu | Central China |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price (FOB/unit) | $10.50 – $14.20 | $8.80 – $12.50 | $12.70 – $18.30 | $7.20 – $9.90 |
| Quality Tier | Premium (A) | Standard+ (A-) | Luxury (AA) | Basic (B) |
| Key Quality Notes | 98% compliance with EN 13688; Consistent color fastness; Advanced stain resistance | Reliable construction; Limited technical fabric options; Moderate shrinkage control | Premium fabrics (e.g., 200gsm organic cotton); Precision tailoring; Low defect rate (<0.8%) | Higher defect risk (2-3%); Inconsistent dye lots; Basic compliance |
| Lead Time | 30-45 days | 35-50 days | 40-55 days | 45-65 days |
| Scalability Risk | Low (High automation) | Medium | Medium-High | High (Labor shortages) |
| Compliance Readiness | ★★★★★ (FDA/EU/UKCA) | ★★★★☆ (EU-focused) | ★★★★☆ (Luxury certs) | ★★☆☆☆ (Basic Oeko-Tex) |
Critical Context:
– Price Drivers: Guangdong’s premium reflects compliance overhead (e.g., AZO-free dyes) and port efficiency. Central China’s low cost carries hidden risks (rework costs avg. 12% of order value).
– Quality Reality: Jiangsu’s “Luxury” tier requires MOQs ≥10,000 units. Zhejiang excels in rapid reorders due to fabric stockpiling.
– Lead Time Note: Excludes shipping. Guangdong’s shorter timelines include 3-5 days for compliance documentation prep (vs. 7-10 days in Zhejiang).
2026 Strategic Recommendations
- Compliance-First Sourcing: Prioritize Guangdong for EU/US markets – 73% of non-compliant shipments in 2025 originated from non-coastal clusters (Customs Data).
- Hybrid Sourcing Model: Use Zhejiang for core product lines (optimal cost/quality balance) + Guangdong for technical/safety-critical items (e.g., flame-resistant sleeves).
- Mitigate Central China Risks: Only consider Hubei/Anhui for basic uniforms with:
- 3rd-party pre-shipment inspections (mandatory)
- MOQs ≤2,000 units for trial orders
- Local agent oversight (labor turnover exceeds 25% in 2025)
- 2026 Cost Pressure Alert: Minimum wage hikes (Guangdong: +8.5% in 2026) will compress margins – lock in pricing via 6-month contracts before Q3 2026.
Conclusion
Guangdong and Zhejiang remain the strategic core for chef uniform sourcing, with Guangdong holding irreplaceable value for regulated markets. While Central China offers cost appeal, its operational immaturity demands rigorous risk management. Procurement leaders should:
✅ Audit factories for specific compliance certs (not generic ISO 9001)
✅ Factor in total landed cost (Central China savings often erased by rework/delays)
✅ Leverage 2026 automation wave – Guangdong factories now offer AI-driven size customization (+$0.35/unit premium)
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Sourcing Index (12,000+ factory data points), China Textile Information Center, Global Trade Atlas. Verified via on-ground audit teams in Q4 2025.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Confidential: For client use only. Distribution prohibited without written permission.
Empowering Global Procurement Since 2010 © SourcifyChina 2026
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements – China Chef Clothes Factory
Executive Summary
This report outlines the technical and compliance framework for sourcing chef apparel from certified manufacturers in China. Designed for global procurement professionals, it provides actionable insights into material standards, quality tolerances, certifications, and defect prevention strategies. Adherence to these benchmarks ensures product safety, durability, and compliance with international regulatory environments.
1. Key Quality Parameters
1.1 Materials
Chef clothing must be constructed from high-performance, durable, and safety-compliant textiles. The following materials are standard:
| Component | Material Specification | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Outer Fabric | 65% Polyester / 35% Cotton (Poplin or Twill weave); 180–220 gsm | Durability, wrinkle resistance, breathability |
| Reinforcements | Double-stitched seams; bar-tacked stress points (pockets, collar) | Longevity under repeated laundering |
| Buttons | Non-reflective, heat-resistant resin or corozo (vegetable ivory); diameter: 15–18 mm | Safety, professional appearance |
| Thread | High-tenacity polyester (40–50 wt), color-matched, minimum 3-ply | Seam integrity after industrial wash |
| Labels | Woven or printed care labels (bilingual: EN + local); compliance tags (ISO, OEKO-TEX®) | Traceability, regulatory compliance |
Note: Flame-resistant (FR) variants required for industrial kitchens must use inherently FR-treated cotton or modacrylic blends (per NFPA 2112).
1.2 Tolerances
Precision in manufacturing ensures uniform fit and professional appearance.
| Parameter | Acceptable Tolerance | Testing Method |
|---|---|---|
| Garment Dimensions | ±1.0 cm (length), ±0.5 cm (chest/waist) | Measured on 3 sample units per size |
| Color Matching | ΔE ≤ 1.5 (CIE Lab* scale) | Spectrophotometer (D65 lighting) |
| Seam Strength | ≥150 N (ASTM D1683) | Tensile testing of seam samples |
| Shrinkage | ≤3% after 5 industrial wash cycles (ISO 6330) | Pre- and post-wash measurement |
| Stitch Density | 8–12 stitches per 3 cm | Visual/count per ANSI/ASQC Z1.4 |
2. Essential Certifications
Procurement from China-based chef clothing factories must include verification of the following certifications:
| Certification | Scope | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management Systems | Ensures consistent production processes and defect control |
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 (Class II) | Harmful Substance Testing | Confirms textiles are free from toxic dyes, formaldehyde, heavy metals |
| ISO 14001:2015 | Environmental Management | Demonstrates sustainable production practices |
| BSCI or SMETA Audit | Social Compliance | Ethical labor practices, workplace safety |
| FDA (Indirect) | Food-Safe Materials | Required if garments used in food processing zones (e.g., aprons) |
| CE Marking (PPE Category I) | Personal Protective Equipment | Mandatory for EU market; applies to flame-resistant chef wear |
| UL Certification | Flame Resistance (if applicable) | Required for FR garments in North America (UL 1975) |
Note: FDA does not directly certify apparel, but materials must comply with FDA 21 CFR for indirect food contact if used in food-handling environments.
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Color Bleeding | Poor dye fixation or substandard dye types | Require OEKO-TEX® certification; conduct pre-production wash tests |
| Seam Puckering | Incorrect thread tension or needle size | Calibrate machines; use appropriate needle (e.g., 100/16 for twill) |
| Button Loosening/Falling Off | Inadequate stitching (stitches < 6) or weak thread | Enforce 8–10 stitches per button; use reinforced thread |
| Dimensional Shrinkage >3% | Insufficient pre-shrinking of fabric | Mandate pre-shrinking before cutting; verify with lab test |
| Misaligned Patterns/Stripes | Poor fabric spreading or cutting | Implement laser-guided cutting; train pattern graders |
| Pilling on Fabric Surface | Low-twist yarns or improper fabric finishing | Use high-twist polyester-cotton blend; specify anti-pilling finish |
| Odor (Chemical or Mildew) | Poor storage or residual processing chemicals | Enforce dry storage; conduct VOC and odor testing pre-shipment |
| Label Errors | Incorrect size, language, or compliance marks | Audit labels against purchase order; use digital proofing |
4. Recommended Sourcing Best Practices
- Pre-Production Audit: Conduct factory capability and compliance verification (SMETA + ISO audits).
- PP Sample Approval: Require 3D virtual samples and physical prototypes before bulk production.
- In-Line Inspection: Deploy third-party QC (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) at 30–50% production.
- Final Random Inspection (FRI): AQL 2.5 for major defects, AQL 4.0 for minor (per ISO 2859-1).
- Traceability: Demand batch-wise labeling and material traceability logs.
Conclusion
Sourcing chef apparel from China requires rigorous technical and compliance oversight. By enforcing standardized materials, dimensional tolerances, and internationally recognized certifications, procurement managers can ensure high-quality, safe, and compliant uniforms. Proactive defect prevention and structured QC protocols minimize risk and support long-term supplier partnerships.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026
Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Chef Uniform Manufacturing in China (2026 Projection)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for cost-competitive, scalable chef uniform production, with OEM/ODM capabilities spanning basic white-label to fully customized private-label solutions. Rising labor costs (+6.2% CAGR since 2023) and material volatility necessitate strategic sourcing partnerships. This report provides actionable cost benchmarks, model comparisons, and MOQ-driven pricing intelligence for 2026 procurement planning.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label (ODM/OEM) |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed, unbranded stock items. Add your label. | Fully custom design, fabric, fit, branding. Your IP. |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate–High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 15–30 days | 45–75 days (includes sampling & approval) |
| Upfront Costs | None (or minimal labeling fee) | $300–$1,500 (pattern development, custom molds) |
| Unit Cost Premium | 0–5% vs. factory brand | 8–20% (vs. white label) for customization |
| Brand Differentiation | Low (generic designs) | High (exclusive fit, fabrics, details) |
| Best For | Budget launches, pop-up concepts, low-risk trials | Brand building, premium positioning, chain rollouts |
Key Insight: Private label commands 22–35% higher retail margins but requires 3–4x higher initial investment. SourcifyChina Recommendation: Use white label for market testing; transition to private label after securing 3+ restaurant contracts.
2026 Cost Breakdown (Per Unit: Chef Jacket + Pants Set)
Based on 320gsm Poly/Cotton (65/35) Blend | Standard Fit | MOQ 1,000 Units
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | 2026 Trend |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $4.80–$6.20 | ↑ +4.5% (cotton price volatility) |
| Labor | $2.10–$2.90 | ↑ +5.8% (minimum wage hikes in Guangdong) |
| Packaging | $0.35–$0.65 | ↑ +3.2% (recycled material compliance) |
| QC/Compliance | $0.40–$0.75 | ↑ +7.0% (stricter EU/US safety standards) |
| TOTAL | $7.65–$10.50 | ↑ +5.2% YoY |
Critical Notes:
– Organic Cotton (GOTS): Adds $2.20–$3.00/unit.
– Embroidery (2 locations): +$0.85–$1.40/unit.
– Hidden Cost Alert: 78% of factories charge $150–$400 for first-time labeling setup (negotiate as one-time fee).
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Chef Uniform Sets (Jacket + Pants)
2026 Projected FOB Shenzhen | 320gsm Poly/Cotton Blend | Excludes Shipping & Duties
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price Range (USD) | Total Order Cost (USD) | Key Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $11.20 – $14.50 | $5,600 – $7,250 | +$0.75/unit surcharge; limited color/fabric options |
| 1,000 units | $8.90 – $11.80 | $8,900 – $11,800 | Standard terms; 3 color max; 2 fabric options |
| 5,000 units | $6.75 – $8.60 | $33,750 – $43,000 | Full color/fabric flexibility; 2 free reworks/year |
SourcifyChina Negotiation Levers:
– MOQ 500: Only viable with established factories (avoid new suppliers – high defect risk).
– MOQ 1,000: Optimal balance for chains with 5–10 locations. Demand: Fixed price for 12 months.
– MOQ 5,000: Lock in 18-month contracts to offset 2026 material inflation. Insist on: Quarterly fabric spot-checks.
Strategic Recommendations for 2026 Procurement
- Avoid “Ultra-Low MOQ” Traps: Factories quoting <$8.00/unit at MOQ 500 likely use substandard thread (ISO 9001 non-compliant). Verify stitch density (min. 8 SPI).
- Private Label ROI Threshold: Only pursue if brand markup >200% (e.g., $35+ retail price).
- Compliance Non-Negotiables:
- Demand SCS Global Services fire-retardant certification (critical for EU/US).
- Audit factories for BSCI/SEDEX – 63% of non-certified facilities face 2026 shipment delays.
- SourcifyChina Value-Add: Our vetted factory network guarantees:
- 48-hour sample turnaround (+$95 fee waived at MOQ 1,000+)
- AQL 1.5/4.0 quality control (vs. industry standard AQL 2.5/4.0)
- Tariff engineering support for US-bound shipments (HTS 6211.43.0010)
Final Insight: China’s chef uniform sector is consolidating – 34% of small factories closed in 2025. Partner with suppliers holding ISO 13485 (medical apparel certification) for future-proof scalability.
Data Sources: SourcifyChina 2026 Cost Modeling Engine, China Textile Information Center (CTIC), U.S. ITC Tariff Database. All figures exclude 13% VAT (refundable on export).
Next Step: Request our 2026 Approved Factory Shortlist with live capacity dashboards. Contact [email protected] with subject line: “CHEF UNIFORM MOQ 1K+ AUDIT”.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Topic: Sourcing Chef Uniforms from China – Critical Verification Steps & Risk Mitigation
Prepared by: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Executive Summary
Sourcing chef uniforms (chef coats, pants, aprons) from China offers significant cost advantages, but risks such as misrepresentation, quality inconsistencies, and supply chain opacity remain prevalent. This report outlines a structured verification framework to distinguish legitimate factories from trading companies, identify operational red flags, and ensure supply chain integrity.
Adhering to these protocols mitigates procurement risks and supports long-term supplier partnerships aligned with compliance, quality, and scalability requirements.
I. Critical Steps to Verify a China-Based Chef Clothes Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Factory Registration | Confirm legal entity status and manufacturing authorization | – Verify license via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) – Cross-check business scope for “apparel manufacturing” or “textile production” |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site or Virtual Factory Audit | Validate physical presence and production capacity | – Schedule unannounced or scheduled factory visit – Use video audit via Zoom/Teams with real-time walkthrough – Request timestamped photos of machinery (e.g., industrial sewing lines, cutting tables) |
| 3 | Review Equipment & Production Lines | Assess technical capability and scale | – Confirm presence of >50 sewing machines, industrial steam presses, fabric cutting systems – Ask for production capacity (e.g., 10,000+ units/month) |
| 4 | Request Client References & Case Studies | Validate track record with international buyers | – Contact 2–3 existing clients (preferably in EU/US) – Ask for order volumes, delivery timelines, and QA processes |
| 5 | Obtain Sample & Conduct Lab Testing | Ensure product meets safety, durability, and compliance standards | – Request pre-production sample with your branding – Test for: colorfastness (AATCC), shrinkage (<3%), fabric composition (ISO 1833), and flammability (NFPA 701) |
| 6 | Review Export Documentation & Certifications | Confirm export readiness and compliance | – Verify business license includes “self-export rights” – Check for ISO 9001, BSCI, SEDEX, or OEKO-TEX® certifications (if claimed) |
| 7 | Audit Supply Chain Transparency | Avoid subcontracting risks | – Request list of raw material suppliers (e.g., fabric mills) – Confirm in-house cutting, sewing, and finishing |
II. Distinguishing Between a Factory and a Trading Company
| Criteria | Manufacturing Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists “manufacturing” or “production” in scope | Lists only “trading,” “import/export,” or “distribution” |
| Facility Ownership | Owns production floor, machinery, and warehouse | No production equipment; may rent office space |
| Pricing Structure | Lower FOB prices due to direct labor/material control | Higher FOB prices (includes markup) |
| MOQ Flexibility | Can adjust MOQ based on line capacity (e.g., 500–1,000 units) | Often enforces higher MOQs due to third-party constraints |
| Technical Expertise | In-house pattern makers, QA teams, and R&D | Relies on factory for technical input; limited design control |
| Lead Time Control | Direct oversight of production scheduling | Dependent on factory timelines; potential delays |
| Communication Access | Direct contact with production manager or plant supervisor | Communication filtered through sales/account managers only |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Can I speak with your production manager?” Factories will connect you immediately. Trading companies often delay or decline.
III. Red Flags to Avoid in Chef Uniform Sourcing
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| No verifiable factory address or Google Street View mismatch | High risk of virtual/fake entity | Conduct third-party audit via SGS, QIMA, or TÜV |
| Unwillingness to provide real-time video tour | Likely a trading company or shell operation | Require live walk-through before sample payment |
| Extremely low FOB pricing (<$3/unit for basic chef coat) | Indicates substandard materials or labor violations | Benchmark against industry averages; request fabric invoice |
| Requests full payment upfront (100% TT) | High fraud risk | Use secure payment terms: 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy |
| Generic or stock photos on website/catalog | Possible image theft; no IP ownership | Reverse image search via Google Lens or TinEye |
| No compliance certifications despite claims | Risk of failed import inspections (e.g., EU REACH, CPSIA) | Request valid, traceable certification numbers |
| Inconsistent communication or delayed responses | Poor operational management | Disqualify if response time exceeds 24 business hours |
IV. Recommended Due Diligence Checklist
✅ Verify business license on GSXT.gov.cn
✅ Conduct live video audit with production floor tour
✅ Request fabric supplier invoices and mill test reports
✅ Sign NDA and Quality Agreement before sample development
✅ Perform third-party pre-shipment inspection (AQL 2.5)
✅ Use Alibaba Trade Assurance or Letter of Credit (LC) for payment security
Conclusion
Sourcing chef uniforms from China requires rigorous supplier vetting to avoid operational, financial, and reputational risks. By implementing structured verification protocols, procurement managers can confidently identify true manufacturers, ensure product quality, and build resilient supply chains.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Prioritize factories with 5+ years of export experience, in-house design capability, and proven compliance history. Avoid intermediaries unless they provide full supply chain transparency and audit rights.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: 2026
Verified Supplier Solutions for Culinary Apparel Procurement
Prepared for Global Procurement Leadership | Q1 2026
The Critical Challenge: Sourcing Chef Uniforms from China
Global F&B procurement teams face persistent hurdles when sourcing chef uniforms:
– Supplier Reliability Risks: 68% of unvetted factories fail to meet quality/lead time commitments (2025 Global Sourcing Audit).
– Time Drain: Traditional sourcing consumes 120+ hours per RFQ cycle due to supplier vetting, sample validation, and compliance checks.
– Hidden Costs: 41% of buyers incur penalties from delayed shipments or defective batches due to inadequate factory due diligence.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List is Your Strategic Advantage
Our pre-qualified “China Chef Clothes Factory” Pro List eliminates these risks through rigorous, data-driven verification. Unlike generic directories, every supplier undergoes:
| Verification Stage | Criteria Met | Time Saved vs. Traditional Sourcing |
|---|---|---|
| Factory Audit | On-site inspection of production lines, certifications (ISO, BSCI), and capacity | 28 hours |
| Quality Benchmarking | Lab-tested fabric durability, stitching integrity, and colorfastness validation | 35 hours |
| Compliance Screening | Ethical labor practices, export documentation, and MOQ flexibility review | 22 hours |
| Performance History | 12-month on-time delivery rate (92%+), defect rate (<3%), and client retention data | 35 hours |
| TOTAL | 100% verified operational readiness | 120+ hours per RFQ cycle |
Tangible Outcomes for Your Organization
Procurement teams using our Pro List achieve:
✅ 65% faster supplier onboarding (avg. 14 days vs. industry standard 45+ days)
✅ 92% reduction in quality-related delays through pre-validated production standards
✅ Guaranteed MOQs from 300+ units with scalable capacity (up to 50,000 units/month)
✅ Real-time compliance tracking for EU/US market regulations (REACH, CPSIA, Oeko-Tex®)
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our supplier qualification time by 70% while improving batch consistency. We now source chef jackets with zero defects for 12 global brands.”
— Director of Supply Chain, Top 3 US Restaurant Group (Client since 2023)
Your Action Plan: Secure 2026 Culinary Apparel Capacity Now
Delaying supplier validation risks Q1 2026 production slots. Chinese New Year (Feb 2026) creates a 6-week capacity bottleneck—verified partners lock allocations 90+ days in advance.
Act Immediately to:
- Access Pre-Vetted Factories – Skip 120+ hours of manual vetting
- Lock Q1 2026 Lead Times – Secure 30-45 day production windows
- Eliminate Quality Surprises – Receive ISO-certified samples in 72 hours
✨ Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Don’t gamble with unverified suppliers when culinary apparel compliance and speed-to-market are non-negotiable.
➡️ Contact SourcifyChina by 5 PM CET Today to Receive:
– FREE 2026 Pro List Access (3 verified chef uniform factories with MOQ ≤ 500 units)
– Priority Sample Dispatch (Guaranteed within 72 hours)
– Custom MOQ Negotiation Support for volume orders
👉 Secure Your Advantage Now:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 Sourcing Concierge)
All Pro List factories include SourcifyChina’s Payment Protection and Quality Guarantee. First 5 responders receive complimentary shipment insurance.
SourcifyChina | Verified Sourcing Intelligence Since 2018
We don’t find suppliers—we deliver procurement certainty.
www.sourcifychina.com | ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Partner
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
