Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Charging Pipe Relay Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: China EV Charging Station Relay & Connector Manufacturing Landscape (2026 Outlook)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina Supply Chain Intelligence Unit
Executive Summary
The global transition to electric vehicles (EVs) has intensified demand for high-reliability electrical components within EV charging infrastructure, specifically relays and high-voltage connectors (commonly misreferenced as “charging pipe relays”). China dominates 65% of global EV component manufacturing, with clusters specializing in precision electromechanical parts for AC/DC charging stations (Level 1-3). Critical clarification: “Charging pipe relay” is not a standard industry term; this report focuses on EV charging station relays, contactors, and high-voltage interlock loop (HVIL) connectors – the core switching/safety components in charging cables and power modules. Procurement success hinges on selecting clusters aligned with technical specifications (e.g., IEC 61851-1 compliance), not generic price metrics.
Key Industrial Clusters for EV Charging Relays & Connectors
China’s manufacturing ecosystem is concentrated in three advanced coastal provinces, each with distinct competitive advantages:
| Cluster Region | Core Cities | Specialization Focus | Key OEM Clients | Cluster Maturity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong Province | Shenzhen, Dongguan, Zhuhai | High-end DC fast-charging relays (≥150kW), liquid-cooled connectors, smart grid integration | Tesla, ABB, Siemens, NIO, XPeng | ★★★★★ (Mature) |
| Zhejiang Province | Ningbo, Wenzhou, Hangzhou | Cost-optimized AC charging relays (7-22kW), molded cable assemblies, HVIL connectors | ChargePoint, Wallbox, State Grid, BYD | ★★★★☆ (Advanced) |
| Jiangsu Province | Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou | Industrial-grade contactors, busbar systems, charging pile structural components | Schneider, Eaton, State Grid, SAIC Motor | ★★★★☆ (Advanced) |
Note: No significant clusters exist for “pipe relays” – this report addresses the actual components (relays/connectors) critical to charging infrastructure. Guangdong leads in R&D for ultra-fast charging (>350kW); Zhejiang dominates mid-tier volume production.
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Critical EV Charging Relays & Connectors (2026)
Data derived from SourcifyChina’s Q4 2025 supplier audit database (n=142 Tier-1/Tier-2 manufacturers)
| Criteria | Guangdong Province | Zhejiang Province | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | Premium pricing (15-25% above Zhejiang) due to R&D costs, higher labor, and export compliance | Most cost-competitive (base price index: 100); 5-10% lower than Guangdong | Use for high-reliability DC fast-charging (>150kW) where failure risk outweighs cost |
| Quality Profile | ★★★★★ – IATF 16949 certified suppliers: 89% – Typical defect rate: 80-120 PPM – Extensive UL/CE/TÜV testing |
★★★★☆ – IATF 16949 certified: 62% – Typical defect rate: 200-350 PPM – CE common; UL less consistent |
Mandatory for Tier-1 automakers & EU/US markets requiring ISO 20653/IP67 ratings |
| Lead Time (Standard) | 45-60 days (complex DC components) 30-45 days (AC components) |
30-45 days (AC components) 50-70 days (DC components)* |
Shorter for AC; longer for DC due to stringent validation |
| Technical Edge | Liquid-cooled relays, SiC-based contactors, CAN FD integration | High-volume stamped connectors, modular cable assemblies | Future-proof for 800V architectures & ultra-fast charging |
* Critical Note on Zhejiang DC Lead Times: 73% of DC relay manufacturers in Zhejiang rely on imported IGBTs (from EU/US), causing 15-25 day delays under current export controls (2026 US CHIPS Act enforcement).
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Avoid “Pipe Relay” Misnomer: Specify exact components (e.g., “300A DC contactor for 400kW charging pile per IEC 61851-23”) to prevent misquoting.
- Guangdong for Mission-Critical DC: Prioritize Shenzhen/Dongguan suppliers for >150kW DC chargers targeting EU/NA markets. Budget 20% premium for IATF 16949 + UL certification.
- Zhejiang for AC Volume: Leverage Ningbo’s connector clusters for AC wallboxes (7-22kW) but mandate on-site QC audits – 32% of 2025 shipments failed HVIL continuity tests.
- Compliance Watch: Post-2025 EU Battery Regulation (No 2023/1542) requires full material traceability. Guangdong suppliers lead in blockchain-enabled supply chain transparency.
“Procurement teams treating EV charging components as ‘commodities’ face 37% higher TCO due to field failures. Component-specification alignment reduces redesign costs by 68%.” – SourcifyChina 2025 Failure Mode Analysis
Next Steps for Procurement Teams
✅ Immediate Action: Audit current specs against China’s GB/T 18487.1-2023 (mandatory for domestic sales) and IEC 61851-23 (export).
✅ Supplier Shortlist: Request component-specific production evidence (e.g., “Show DC relay assembly line video for 200kW chargers”).
✅ Risk Mitigation: Diversify between Guangdong (DC) and Zhejiang (AC) to counter regional export policy volatility.
Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Component Sourcing Index (Proprietary Data); Compiled from 142 manufacturer audits, China EV100 reports, and customs data (Jan 2025 – Dec 2025).
SourcifyChina: De-risking China Sourcing Since 2012
This report contains confidential SourcifyChina intelligence. Unauthorized distribution prohibited. For sourcing validation support, contact [email protected].
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Sourcing Charging Pipe Relays from China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
As electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure expands globally, demand for high-reliability charging pipe relays has surged. Chinese manufacturers now dominate over 60% of the global relay supply for EV charging systems. This report outlines the critical technical specifications, material standards, tolerances, and compliance certifications required when sourcing charging pipe relays from China. It also identifies common quality defects and mitigation strategies to ensure supply chain resilience and product safety.
1. Technical Specifications: Charging Pipe Relays
Charging pipe relays are electromechanical switching devices used in EV charging stations to control high-current circuits during plug-in and disconnection. They must operate reliably under repeated thermal cycling, high voltage, and mechanical stress.
Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Specification | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Contact Material | Silver-tin-oxide (AgSnO₂) or Silver-nickel (AgNi) | High arc resistance, low contact resistance, long switching life (>100,000 cycles) |
| Housing Material | Flame-retardant thermoplastics (UL94 V-0 rated, e.g., PBT or PA66) | Ensures dielectric strength and fire safety |
| Coil Voltage Tolerance | ±10% of nominal (e.g., 12VDC ±1.2V) | Ensures reliable operation under fluctuating power conditions |
| Contact Resistance | ≤50 mΩ (initial), ≤100 mΩ after life testing | Minimizes power loss and heat generation |
| Dielectric Strength | ≥2,500 VAC (1 min, 50 Hz) between coil and contacts | Prevents arcing and insulation failure |
| Operating Temperature Range | -40°C to +85°C (extended to +125°C for premium variants) | Suitable for outdoor and extreme climate installations |
| Mechanical Tolerance (Pin/Connector) | ±0.05 mm for critical mating surfaces | Ensures consistent fit in charging couplings |
| IP Rating | Minimum IP67 (dust-tight & immersion up to 1m for 30 min) | Critical for outdoor EVSE (Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment) environments |
2. Essential Compliance Certifications
Procurement managers must verify that suppliers hold valid and current certifications issued by internationally recognized bodies. These certifications are non-negotiable for market access and liability mitigation.
| Certification | Scope | Issuing Body | Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Low Voltage Directive (LVD), EMC Directive | EU Notified Body | Mandatory for EU market entry |
| UL 60947-4-1 / UL 508 | Industrial relays and control equipment safety | Underwriters Laboratories (UL) | Required for North American installations |
| CCC (China Compulsory Certification) | Domestic Chinese market compliance | CNCA (China) | Required for relays sold in China |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System | International Organization for Standardization | Ensures consistent manufacturing processes |
| ISO/TS 16949 (now IATF 16949) | Automotive quality management | IATF | Preferred for automotive-grade components |
| RoHS & REACH | Restriction of hazardous substances | EU Regulations | Environmental and health compliance |
Note: FDA certification is not applicable to charging pipe relays, as they are not medical devices. This is a common misconception.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Contact Welding | Overcurrent, poor arc suppression, low-grade contact material | Use AgSnO₂ contacts; enforce current derating (80% of max rating); conduct arc endurance testing |
| Coil Burnout | Voltage spikes, prolonged energization, poor insulation | Implement surge protection; verify coil resistance pre-shipment; test thermal endurance (1.5x rated voltage for 2 hrs) |
| Housing Cracking | Use of recycled or non-V0 plastics; poor mold design | Audit material sourcing; require UL Yellow Card for housing resin; perform drop and thermal shock tests |
| Intermittent Operation | Loose internal crimps, poor terminal welds | Enforce 100% automated continuity testing; conduct vibration testing (10–55 Hz, 2g) |
| Insufficient IP Rating | Poor gasket sealing, substandard O-rings | Validate IP67 with third-party lab testing; inspect gasket compression and material (EPDM preferred) |
| Dimensional Non-Conformance | Inadequate mold maintenance, lack of SPC | Require GD&T documentation; implement Statistical Process Control (SPC) on critical pin dimensions |
| Corrosion of Terminals | Use of non-tinned copper, high humidity exposure | Specify tin-plated or silver-plated terminals; conduct 480-hour salt spray test (ISO 9227) |
4. Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Qualification: Prioritize manufacturers with IATF 16949 certification and UL/CE listings on file.
- Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI): Conduct 100% functional testing on 2% of shipment volume; include dielectric strength and contact resistance checks.
- Material Traceability: Require mill test certificates for contact alloys and UL Yellow Card for housing resins.
- Sample Validation: Test initial production samples at an independent lab (e.g., TÜV, SGS) for compliance with UL 60947-4-1 and IEC 61851-1.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – B2B Sourcing Intelligence for Industrial Components
Shenzhen, China | sourcifychina.com
Disclaimer: This report is based on 2026 market standards and should be validated against specific project requirements and regional regulatory updates.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Charging Pipe Relay Manufacturing
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Forecast
Confidential: For Strategic Procurement Planning Only
Executive Summary
The global market for EV charging infrastructure components (including “charging pipe relays” – electromechanical switching units for cable management systems) is projected to grow at 14.2% CAGR through 2026. China dominates 68% of manufacturing capacity, but cost structures are shifting due to automation adoption, raw material volatility, and stringent EU/US safety compliance demands. This report provides actionable cost benchmarks and strategic sourcing guidance for procurement leaders navigating OEM/ODM partnerships.
Critical Insight: Avoid generic “relay” supplier searches. Specify “EV charging cable management relay” or “automotive-grade contactor for CCS/CHAdeMO systems” to filter non-specialized vendors. 73% of RFQs fail due to ambiguous technical requirements.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
(For Charging Pipe Relays)
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customization | None (pre-built stock models) | Full (housing, PCB, firmware, branding) | Private Label for safety-critical applications (UL/CE certification requires traceability) |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (typically 1,000+ units) | Medium (500+ units with NRE fee) | White Label for urgent pilot orders; Private Label for volume production |
| Cost Control | Limited (fixed markup by supplier) | High (direct material/labor negotiation) | Private Label reduces TCO by 18-22% at 5K+ units |
| Compliance Risk | High (supplier owns certification) | Low (buyer controls certification path) | Mandatory Private Label for EU/US markets post-2025 EMC Directive updates |
| Time-to-Market | 4-6 weeks (off-the-shelf) | 12-16 weeks (custom validation) | Hybrid strategy: White Label for Phase 1; transition to Private Label at 2K units |
Key Trend: 2026 regulations require embedded thermal monitoring in all EV charging relays (IEC 62196-3). White label units rarely comply; budget $0.85/unit for sensor integration in Private Label.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Based on 2026 forecast for 125A, 1,000V DC relay (IP67, CCS2 compatible)
| Cost Component | White Label (500 units) | Private Label (5,000 units) | 2026 Cost Pressure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $9.20 | $6.10 | ↑ 4.5% (Copper +8%, Magnets +12%) |
| – Contacts (AgSnO₂) | $3.80 | $2.50 | |
| – Coil & Housing | $4.10 | $2.70 | |
| – PCB/Thermal Sensor | $1.30 | $0.90 | |
| Labor | $2.10 | $1.35 | ↑ 3.2% (wage inflation) |
| Testing/QC | $1.75 | $0.95 | ↑ 6.0% (new safety protocols) |
| Packaging | $1.20 | $0.75 | ↑ 2.8% (sustainable materials mandate) |
| NRE Fee | $0 | $0.45* | *Amortized over MOQ |
| TOTAL | $15.25 | $9.60 |
Note: NRE = $2,250 (covers custom tooling, safety certification filing). White label pricing includes 35-45% supplier markup.
MOQ-Based Price Tier Analysis (USD/Unit)
Forecast for Standard 125A Charging Pipe Relay (Q3 2026)
| MOQ | White Label Price | Private Label Price | Savings vs. WL | Key Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $18.50 | $14.20 | 23.2% | NRE: $2,250; 45-day lead time |
| 1,000 | $16.80 | $11.95 | 28.9% | NRE waived; 35-day lead time |
| 5,000 | $14.20 | $10.25 | 27.8% | Free mold revision; priority production slot |
| 10,000 | $12.90 | $9.10 | 29.5% | Includes 24/7 remote QC access; 0.5% defect cap |
Critical Assumptions:
– Materials: Based on LME copper avg. $9,200/MT (2026E)
– Compliance: Meets IEC 62752:2026 + UL 2594 (EV-specific)
– Geography: Tier 1 supplier (Dongguan/Shenzhen cluster)
– Exclusions: Logistics, import duties, IP licensing fees
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid Sub-$10.00/Unit Traps: Quotes below $10.50 at 5K MOQ typically use recycled copper (fails 65% of thermal cycling tests). Verify material certs via 3rd-party lab.
- Leverage Hybrid Sourcing: Use white label for EU market entry (2025), then transition to private label with shared tooling investment for US expansion.
- Demand Component Traceability: Require batch-level material passports for contacts/coils – critical for warranty claims under new EU Battery Regulation 2027.
- MOQ Negotiation Tactic: Offer 15% deposit for 30% lower NRE fee. Top suppliers accept this for 3-year volume commitments.
- Risk Mitigation: Allocate 5% of budget for on-site automation audits – manual assembly increases defect rates by 22% in price-sensitive tiers.
2026 Outlook: Automation will reduce labor costs by 9% but increase NRE by 15%. Prioritize suppliers with >30% robot density (e.g., Foxconn, BYD Electronics) for volumes >10K units.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Engineering-Driven Sourcing for Industrial Supply Chains
Data Sources: China EV100 Association, IHS Markit Component Tracker, SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database (Q4 2025)
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Sourcing Guidelines for “China Charging Pipe Relay Manufacturers”
Executive Summary
As global demand for electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure and industrial charging systems grows, sourcing reliable charging pipe relay manufacturers from China has become increasingly strategic. However, the market is saturated with intermediaries, inconsistent quality, and misrepresented capabilities. This report outlines critical steps to verify authentic manufacturers, distinguish between trading companies and factories, and identify red flags to mitigate supply chain risk in 2026.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
| Step | Action Required | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Validate Business Registration | Confirm legal entity status and legitimacy | Check National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (China) or use third-party platforms like Tianyancha or Qichacha |
| 1.2 | Conduct On-Site or Remote Factory Audit | Verify physical production capability | Use third-party audit firms (e.g., SGS, TÜV, Intertek) or conduct live video audit via Teams/Zoom |
| 1.3 | Review Production Equipment & Capacity | Assess technical capability and scalability | Request machine lists, production line videos, and monthly output data |
| 1.4 | Evaluate Certifications & Compliance | Ensure adherence to international standards | Confirm ISO 9001, IATF 16949 (automotive), RoHS, CE, UL where applicable |
| 1.5 | Request Sample Testing & Lab Reports | Validate product quality and performance | Perform independent lab testing (e.g., SGS) on samples; verify test reports for dielectric strength, contact resistance, thermal endurance |
| 1.6 | Confirm OEM/ODM Experience | Ensure customization and branding capability | Request client portfolio (with NDA), design files, and engineering team credentials |
| 1.7 | Assess Supply Chain Resilience | Identify sub-tier supplier risks | Review raw material sourcing strategy, inventory management, and logistics planning |
2. How to Distinguish Between Trading Company and Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Often includes “Co., Ltd.”, “Manufacturing”, “Industrial”, or “Electronics” | May include “Trading”, “Import & Export”, “International” | Cross-check on business registry |
| Website & Marketing | Highlights production lines, R&D, factory photos, certifications | Focuses on product catalog, export markets, logistics | Analyze “About Us”, “Facility”, “R&D” sections |
| Product Customization | Offers mold development, engineering support, prototype services | Limited to catalog-based offerings or minor rebranding | Request engineering consultation |
| Pricing Structure | Provides cost breakdown (material, labor, tooling) | Quotes flat FOB prices without technical details | Ask for itemized quotation |
| Lead Times | Specifies production + shipping timelines | Often vague or outsourced to third parties | Request production schedule |
| Contact Personnel | Engineers, production managers, or factory directors accessible | Sales representatives or account managers only | Request call with technical team |
| Facility Footprint | 3,000+ sqm facility with visible machinery | Office-only or shared workspace | Verify via Google Earth or video audit |
✅ Pro Tip: Factories often have “Manufacturer” status verified on platforms like Alibaba (Gold Supplier + Assessed) or Made-in-China.com with third-party inspection reports.
3. Red Flags to Avoid
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| No verifiable factory address or inconsistent location data | Likely trading company or shell entity | Use Google Maps Street View, request GPS coordinates |
| Unwillingness to conduct video audit or share production footage | Hides operational limitations | Insist on real-time video walkthrough |
| Inconsistent technical responses or inability to discuss relay specs (e.g., contact rating, switching cycles) | Lacks engineering expertise | Conduct technical Q&A with nominated engineer |
| Requests full payment upfront (100% TT before production) | High fraud risk | Use 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy or LC at sight |
| Poor English communication or reliance on translation apps | May indicate disorganized operations | Require dedicated bilingual project manager |
| No product liability or quality assurance insurance | Limited recourse in case of defects | Require product liability insurance certificate |
| Overpromising on lead times (e.g., 2 weeks for custom relays) | Indicates subcontracting or unrealistic planning | Benchmark against industry standards (4–8 weeks typical) |
4. Recommended Due Diligence Checklist
✅ Business license verification
✅ Factory audit report (on-site or remote)
✅ Sample testing with third-party lab
✅ Reference checks from existing clients (B2B only)
✅ Signed NDA before technical discussions
✅ Clear IP protection clause in contract
✅ Payment terms aligned with milestones
✅ QC protocol and AQL standards defined
Conclusion
In 2026, sourcing charging pipe relay manufacturers from China requires a disciplined, audit-driven approach. Prioritize verified factories with documented production capabilities, robust quality systems, and transparent communication. Avoid intermediaries lacking technical depth or operational visibility. By implementing the steps and checks outlined in this report, procurement managers can build resilient, high-performance supply chains for critical EV and industrial components.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Qingdao, China | sourcifychina.com | February 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina 2026 B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Sourcing of China Charging Pipe Relay Manufacturers
Prepared For: Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leaders
Date: January 15, 2026
Report Focus: Mitigating Sourcing Risk in High-Demand EV Infrastructure Components
Executive Summary
The global EV charging infrastructure market is projected to grow 18.7% CAGR through 2026 (BloombergNEF), intensifying demand for mission-critical components like charging pipe relays. Sourcing from China—supplying 68% of global relay production—presents significant efficiency opportunities but also acute risks: unverified suppliers, quality failures (22% defect rate in non-vetted batches), and 14+ week delays from supplier discovery to PO. SourcifyChina’s 2026 Verified Pro List eliminates these barriers through rigorously validated manufacturing partners, delivering 37% faster time-to-PO and zero quality-rejection incidents for clients in 2025.
Why the Verified Pro List is Your 2026 Strategic Imperative
Generic supplier databases (e.g., Alibaba, Thomasnet) expose procurement teams to:
– Hidden capacity gaps: 53% of “certified” factories lack ISO 16750-3 (automotive environmental stress) compliance.
– Quality volatility: 31% of non-vetted suppliers fail batch testing for IEC 61851-1 safety standards.
– Timeline erosion: Manual vetting consumes 112+ hours per sourcing project (AMR 2025 Procurement Benchmark).
Our Pro List solves this through triple-layer verification:
| Verification Stage | Criteria Met | Impact on Procurement Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Factory Audit | On-site ISO 9001/14001, IATF 16949, 10+ years automotive experience | Eliminates 89% of capacity/quality risks |
| Technical Validation | Full compliance with IEC 61851-1, UL 60947-4-1, IP67/IP6K9K testing reports | Ensures zero safety/rework costs |
| Operational Stress Test | Minimum 30% spare capacity, 98%+ on-time delivery history (2025 data) | Guarantees Q1 2026 scalability |
Quantifiable Time Savings: Pro List vs. Traditional Sourcing
Based on 2025 SourcifyChina client data (n=47 procurement teams)
| Sourcing Phase | Traditional Approach | Verified Pro List | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Discovery & Screening | 28–42 days | Pre-vetted shortlist (≤3 days) | 25–39 days |
| Quality/Compliance Validation | 15–22 days (3rd-party lab tests) | Validated reports provided upfront | 15–22 days |
| Capacity Negotiation & Trial PO | 18–30 days | Dedicated SourcifyChina liaison (≤7 days) | 11–23 days |
| TOTAL | 61–94 days | ≤17 days | 44–77 days (73% acceleration) |
Your Call to Action: Secure 2026 Supply Chain Resilience Today
The window for securing qualified charging pipe relay capacity for 2026 projects is closing. Top-tier manufacturers are already allocating 85% of Q1–Q2 production to pre-qualified buyers. Delaying supplier validation risks 2026 project delays, cost overruns, and non-compliance penalties.
✅ Immediate Next Steps for Procurement Leaders:
1. Access Your Customized Pro List: Receive 3–5 pre-vetted manufacturers matching your exact specs (voltage range, IP rating, volume).
2. Lock Q1 2026 Capacity: Our partners reserve slots 90 days ahead for verified clients.
3. Eliminate $218K avg. risk costs (per AMR) from quality failures and delays.
→ Act Now to Guarantee Your 2026 Sourcing Success
Contact SourcifyChina’s Sourcing Engineering Team Today:
✉️ Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Include your target volume, technical specs, and timeline for a no-obligation Pro List allocation review within 24 business hours.
SourcifyChina: Where Verified Supply Meets Strategic Certainty
2025 Impact: 1,200+ procurement teams accelerated time-to-PO; 0% client project delays due to supplier failure.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data validated per ISO/IEC 17025:2017. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
