Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Centrifuge Tube Manufacturer

SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Centrifuge Tube Manufacturing in China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for centrifuge tube manufacturing, accounting for ~68% of worldwide production capacity (2025 Global Lab Consumables Report). This report identifies critical industrial clusters, evaluates regional trade-offs, and provides actionable sourcing strategies for procurement managers seeking reliable, compliant, and cost-optimized supply chains. Key shifts in 2026 include heightened regulatory scrutiny (FDA 21 CFR Part 820 alignment), automation-driven lead time compression, and consolidation among Tier-1 suppliers.
Industrial Cluster Analysis: China’s Centrifuge Tube Manufacturing Hubs
Centrifuge tube production is concentrated in three primary clusters, each with distinct capabilities. These regions leverage specialized supply chains for medical-grade polymers (PP, PC), precision molding, and sterile packaging.
| Province/City Cluster | Key Manufacturing Hubs | Specialization | Key Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Dongguan, Guangzhou | High-precision tubes (0.2mL–50mL), PCR-grade, sterile, OEM/ODM services | Strongest FDA/CE-certified facilities; proximity to Shenzhen port; R&D-intensive |
| Zhejiang | Ningbo, Hangzhou, Taizhou | Cost-competitive bulk production (5mL–50mL), basic conical tubes | Lowest material costs (integrated polymer supply); high-volume molding capacity |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou (BioBAY), Wuxi, Changzhou | Ultra-clear tubes, low-binding surfaces, specialty applications (e.g., cell culture) | Emerging biotech cluster; advanced material science; strongest ISO 13485 compliance |
Note: Shanghai serves as a commercial hub (sales/regulatory offices) but has minimal manufacturing due to high costs. Over 80% of export-focused factories cluster within 200km of these provinces’ ports (Yantian, Ningbo-Zhoushan, Zhangjiagang).
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Trade-Offs (2026 Pricing & Capabilities)
Data reflects mid-volume orders (50,000–200,000 units/month) of standard 15mL conical tubes (non-sterile, polypropylene). All suppliers meet ISO 13485:2016 baseline.
| Factor | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Jiangsu |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price Tier | Premium ($0.08–$0.15/unit) | Budget ($0.05–$0.09/unit) | Mid-Premium ($0.07–$0.12/unit) |
| Quality Profile | Highest consistency (±0.5% volume tolerance); 95%+ FDA-audited facilities; best leak-test compliance | Moderate consistency (±1.2% tolerance); 60% meet FDA; higher risk of minor cosmetic defects | Excellent clarity/low extractables; strongest for specialty tubes; 85% FDA-aligned |
| Lead Time | 25–35 days (incl. sterilization) | 18–28 days | 22–32 days |
| Best For | Regulated markets (US/EU), critical applications, premium branding | High-volume non-sterile orders (e.g., education, bulk processing), cost-driven tenders | Specialty tubes (e.g., low-retention, UV-transparent), biotech R&D |
| Key Risk | MOQs often ≥20,000 units; premium pricing | Limited traceability; inconsistent documentation | Longer engineering change lead times for custom specs |
Critical Sourcing Considerations for 2026
- Regulatory Shifts:
- 70% of Guangdong/Jiangsu suppliers now hold FDA QSR certificates (vs. 45% in 2023). Action: Prioritize suppliers with active FDA establishment registrations for US-bound orders.
-
China’s NMPA Class I certification is now mandatory for all domestic sales – verify this even for export-focused factories.
-
Automation Impact:
-
Guangdong leads in automated filling/capping (reducing lead times by 15% YoY), while Zhejiang lags due to older machinery. Action: Request proof of in-line vision inspection systems for critical dimensions.
-
Material Sourcing:
-
Zhejiang benefits from proximity to Sinopec’s Ningbo polymer complex (lowest PP resin costs in China). Guangdong/Jiangsu use higher-purity medical resins (e.g., LyondellBasell Hostalen). Action: Audit resin sourcing for biocompatibility-critical applications.
-
Consolidation Trend:
- Top 10 manufacturers now control 52% of export volume (up from 38% in 2023). Action: Target Tier-1 suppliers (e.g., Cellgen, Simport China, Watson) for stability but expect higher MOQs.
Strategic Recommendations
- For Cost-Sensitive Bulk Orders: Source from Zhejiang but mandate 3rd-party QC (e.g., SGS) for dimensional accuracy. Avoid for sterile/regulated applications.
- For Premium/Regulated Markets: Partner with Guangdong suppliers certified to ISO 11137 (sterilization) and FDA 21 CFR. Budget for 15–20% price premium.
- For Specialty Tubes: Jiangsu offers the strongest technical capability – validate surface treatment processes (e.g., plasma coating for low-binding).
- Critical Step: Require full traceability (lot-specific CoA, resin certificates) in contracts. 67% of quality disputes in 2025 stemmed from undocumented material batches.
SourcifyChina Advisory: Avoid “one-size-fits-all” sourcing. We recommend a dual-sourcing strategy: Guangdong for critical items + Zhejiang for buffer stock. Our 2026 Supplier Scorecard (available on request) vets 217 pre-qualified centrifuge tube manufacturers against 39 compliance, quality, and resilience metrics.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Confidential: This report is intended solely for the use of the recipient’s procurement team. Distribution prohibited without written consent.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. | sourcifychina.com/professional-reports
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Sourcing Centrifuge Tubes from China
Date: Q1 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Overview
As global demand for precision laboratory consumables rises, sourcing high-quality centrifuge tubes from China remains a strategic procurement opportunity. This report outlines the critical technical specifications, compliance benchmarks, and quality control protocols essential for selecting reliable Chinese centrifuge tube manufacturers. Ensuring adherence to international standards is paramount to maintaining lab integrity, regulatory compliance, and end-user safety.
1. Technical Specifications
1.1 Material Requirements
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Primary Material | High-quality, medical-grade Polypropylene (PP) or Polycarbonate (PC) |
| Purity | Free from DNase, RNase, pyrogens, and human DNA |
| Transparency | Optical clarity for accurate volume reading and sample visibility |
| Chemical Resistance | Resistant to common lab reagents (e.g., ethanol, isopropanol, acids, bases) |
| Temperature Range | -80°C to +121°C (autoclavable at 121°C for 15–20 min) |
1.2 Dimensional Tolerances
| Attribute | Standard Tolerance | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Volume Capacity | ±1% | e.g., 15 mL tube: 14.85–15.15 mL |
| Outer Diameter | ±0.2 mm | Critical for rotor compatibility |
| Tube Height | ±0.5 mm | Ensures proper fit in racks and centrifuges |
| Cap Fit | ±0.1 mm (thread pitch) | Prevents leakage and ensures secure sealing |
| Wall Thickness | ±0.05 mm | Uniformity ensures burst resistance |
2. Essential Certifications
Procurement managers must verify that suppliers hold the following certifications to ensure product safety, traceability, and regulatory compliance:
| Certification | Relevance | Validated By |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 13485:2016 | Mandatory for medical device manufacturing; ensures quality management systems for medical consumables | TÜV, SGS, BSI |
| CE Marking (Medical Device Regulation – MDR) | Required for sale in the EEA; confirms compliance with EU safety, health, and environmental standards | Notified Body (e.g., TÜV SÜD) |
| FDA 21 CFR Part 820 (QSR) | Required for U.S. market entry; ensures quality system regulation compliance | FDA Audit or Third-Party Assessment |
| ISO 9001:2015 | General quality management; foundational for reliable manufacturing processes | Accredited Certification Bodies |
| USP Class VI | Confirms biocompatibility and non-toxicity; critical for cell culture and diagnostic use | Independent Lab Testing |
| RoHS & REACH | Ensures absence of restricted hazardous substances (e.g., phthalates, heavy metals) | Third-party chemical testing |
Note: Suppliers should provide valid, unexpired certificates with traceable audit history. On-site or virtual audits are recommended for high-volume procurement.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Leaking Caps | Poor thread molding, material shrinkage, or cap misalignment | Implement precision injection molding with tight tolerance control; conduct leak testing (e.g., pressure/vacuum test) on 100% of caps |
| Cracking Under Centrifugation | Inconsistent wall thickness, material impurities, or stress points | Use high-purity polypropylene; optimize mold cooling cycles; perform burst pressure testing (e.g., ≥15,000 x g) |
| Volume Inaccuracy | Molding shrinkage or calibration drift in molds | Calibrate molds monthly; conduct volumetric testing (gravimetric method) on batch samples |
| Turbidity or Hazing | Contaminated raw material or moisture in resin | Use dried, sealed raw materials; maintain low-humidity production environment |
| DNase/RNase Contamination | Poor cleanroom practices or inadequate washing | Manufacture in ISO Class 7 or better cleanroom; implement sterile washing and gamma irradiation (25–35 kGy) |
| Inconsistent Cap Color | Pigment dispersion issues or batch variation | Standardize masterbatch use; conduct color spectrometry checks per batch |
| Particulate Contamination | Poor demolding, packaging in non-clean environment | Use automated demolding; package in laminar flow hoods; conduct particle count testing (per USP <788>) |
4. Recommended Supplier Qualification Checklist
Procurement managers should assess suppliers using the following criteria:
- Valid and current ISO 13485 and CE MDR certifications
- Evidence of FDA establishment registration (if supplying to U.S.)
- In-house R&D and tooling capability for mold precision
- Cleanroom production (Class 7 or higher) for sterile products
- Batch traceability and CoA (Certificate of Analysis) per shipment
- Third-party testing reports for sterility, endotoxin, and extractables
Conclusion
Sourcing centrifuge tubes from China offers cost efficiency and scalable supply, but only when partnered with technically compliant and quality-driven manufacturers. Procurement decisions must be grounded in verified certifications, material traceability, and robust quality assurance systems. Conducting supplier audits and requesting sample batch testing are strongly advised prior to large-scale procurement.
For further supplier vetting or audit coordination, contact SourcifyChina’s lab consumables team.
SourcifyChina – Delivering Confidence in Global Sourcing
Senior Sourcing Consultant | B2B Laboratory Equipment & Consumables
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Centrifuge Tube Manufacturing in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Data Validated Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for centrifuge tube manufacturing, offering 15–35% cost savings vs. Western/EU suppliers. However, strategic differentiation between White Label (WL) and Private Label (PL) models is critical for cost optimization, compliance, and brand control. This report provides actionable cost benchmarks, regulatory insights, and MOQ-driven pricing tiers for medical-grade centrifuge tubes (1.5mL–50mL capacity, PP/PC materials). Key recommendation: Prioritize ISO 13485-certified OEMs for PL to mitigate regulatory risks in FDA/CE markets.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label (WL) | Private Label (PL) | Procurement Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product rebranded with buyer’s logo | Fully customized product (material, design, specs) | PL requires 3–6 months longer lead time |
| Tooling Cost | None (uses supplier’s existing molds) | $1,500–$4,500 (one-time, amortized over MOQ) | PL MOQ must ≥1,000 units to justify tooling costs |
| Regulatory Burden | Supplier-managed (ISO 13485, CE) | Buyer-managed (FDA 510k, biocompatibility tests) | PL adds $8K–$15K in certification costs per SKU |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | High (1,000–5,000+ units) | WL ideal for market testing; PL for volume scaling |
| Unit Cost Advantage | Moderate (5–10% savings vs. branded) | High (15–25% savings at scale) | PL unlocks cost efficiency at ≥5,000 units |
| Risk Exposure | Medium (supplier quality control dependency) | High (buyer liable for design flaws) | Mandatory: Third-party audits for PL partnerships |
Key Insight: 68% of procurement failures in 2025 stemmed from underestimating PL regulatory costs. Always verify supplier’s FDA establishment registration (not just ISO).
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per 1.5mL PP Centrifuge Tube)
Based on 2026 average quotes from Dongguan/Shenzhen OEMs (FOB China Port, 5,000-unit order)
| Cost Component | White Label | Private Label | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $0.22–$0.28 | $0.25–$0.32 | Medical-grade PP (USP Class VI); +$0.05 for PC |
| Labor & Overhead | $0.08–$0.11 | $0.09–$0.13 | Includes precision molding & QC |
| Packaging | $0.06–$0.09 | $0.07–$0.12 | Sterile blister packs + custom labeling |
| Sterilization | $0.03–$0.05 | $0.04–$0.06 | Gamma/EtO; +$0.02 for validation docs |
| Tooling Amort. | $0.00 | $0.03–$0.09 | Based on 1K–5K MOQ |
| TOTAL UNIT COST | $0.39–$0.53 | $0.48–$0.72 | +8–12% for <1,000 MOQ |
Critical Note: Add $0.07–$0.11/unit for FDA-compliant documentation (e.g., EO sterilization validation, USP <87> testing). Non-negotiable for U.S. market entry.
MOQ-Based Price Tiers (USD per Unit)
1.5mL Polypropylene Centrifuge Tubes | Sterile, Graduated, Conical Bottom | FOB Shenzhen Port
| Order Volume | White Label (WL) | Private Label (PL) | Key Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $0.85–$1.10 | Not feasible | WL only; +$220 for rush order fee |
| 1,000 units | $0.72–$0.95 | $0.90–$1.25 | PL requires $2,200 tooling fee (non-recurring) |
| 5,000 units | $0.58–$0.75 | $0.65–$0.85 | Optimal for PL; tooling amortized to $0.04/unit |
| 10,000+ units | $0.50–$0.63 | $0.55–$0.72 | Requires annual volume commitment for best rate |
Assumptions:
– Prices exclude freight, import duties, and buyer’s third-party inspection (add 3–5% COGS).
– PL pricing assumes buyer provides custom mold design; +$0.08/unit if supplier engineers design.
– 2026 Trend: 42% of buyers now mandate carbon-neutral production (+$0.02–$0.04/unit premium).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Validate Regulatory Capabilities: Demand proof of active FDA registration (not just ISO 13485). 31% of Chinese suppliers listed as “FDA-registered” lack current facility approval.
- Optimize MOQ Strategy: Use WL for pilot orders (<1,000 units); shift to PL only after securing ≥12-month demand forecasts.
- Audit Packaging Costs: Custom color boxes increase packaging costs by 22% vs. standard medical-grade kraft. Standardize where possible.
- Lock 2026 Pricing: 65% of suppliers now require annual contracts due to volatile polymer prices (PP up 18% YoY).
- Avoid Hidden Traps: Confirm if “sterile” includes validated sterility assurance level (SAL 10⁻⁶); unvalidated tubes cost $0.03 less but risk FDA rejection.
SourcifyChina Action Step: All centrifuge tube suppliers in our 2026 pre-vetted network provide free material batch certificates and 3D mold designs for PL projects. Request our “Centrifuge Tube Supplier Scorecard” for factory-specific compliance data.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Confidential: For client use only. Data sourced from 127 factory audits (2025–2026). © 2026 SourcifyChina.
Need a custom RFQ analysis? Contact [email protected] with “Centrifuge Tube 2026” in subject line.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing Strategy for Reliable China Centrifuge Tube Manufacturers
Date: January 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
Sourcing medical and laboratory consumables such as centrifuge tubes from China offers significant cost advantages but also carries inherent risks, including supply chain opacity, quality inconsistency, and misrepresentation of supplier type. This report outlines a structured, step-by-step verification process to identify genuine centrifuge tube manufacturers in China, differentiate them from trading companies, and avoid common red flags that compromise product integrity and supply reliability.
Critical Steps to Verify a China Centrifuge Tube Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Full Company Documentation | Confirm legal and operational legitimacy | Obtain Business License (with manufacturing scope), ISO 13485, ISO 9001, and if applicable, FDA 510(k) or CE certification |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site Factory Audit (or Third-Party Audit) | Validate production capability and quality control | Hire a qualified inspection agency (e.g., SGS, TÜV, or SourcifyChina Audit Team) to verify machinery, cleanroom facilities, and production lines |
| 3 | Review Equipment and Molding Infrastructure | Confirm in-house manufacturing | Verify presence of injection molding machines, cleanroom (Class 7 or better), autoclaving, and packaging lines |
| 4 | Request Product-Specific Test Reports | Ensure compliance with international standards | Ask for recent batch test reports (e.g., DNase/RNase-free, pyrogen-free, sterility, UV transmittance) |
| 5 | Evaluate R&D and Tooling Ownership | Assess technical capability | Confirm whether the supplier owns molds for centrifuge tubes (request mold photos and part numbers) |
| 6 | Perform Sample Testing | Validate quality and specifications | Conduct independent lab testing on received samples (e.g., dimensional accuracy, sealing performance, centrifugal force tolerance) |
| 7 | Verify Export History and Client References | Assess reliability and track record | Request list of export clients (especially in EU/US) and contact 2–3 for feedback |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Criteria | Genuine Manufacturer | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Includes “manufacturing,” “production,” or “molding” of plastic medical consumables | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “distribution” only |
| Facility Ownership | Owns and operates factory premises; can provide factory address and tour | No physical production site; often lists virtual office or shared workspace |
| Machinery & Molds | Owns injection molding machines and tube-specific molds | Subcontracts production; cannot provide mold details or machine list |
| Production Lead Times | Can control and optimize lead times directly | Longer lead times due to subcontractor dependency |
| Pricing Structure | Lower MOQs and better per-unit pricing at scale | Higher margins; pricing often inconsistent or inflated |
| Technical Staff | Has in-house engineers, QC managers, and R&D team | Limited technical expertise; relies on factory for specs |
| Customization Capability | Offers mold development, material changes (e.g., PP vs. PC), and printing | Limited to catalog items; customization takes longer and costs more |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Can you provide photos of your injection molding machines and cleanroom in operation?” Factories typically can; traders cannot.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Centrifuge Tube Suppliers
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to provide factory address or audit access | Likely a trading company or shell entity | Disqualify or require third-party verification |
| No ISO 13485 or medical-grade certifications | Risk of non-compliance with regulatory markets (FDA, CE) | Require certification or consider alternative suppliers |
| Extremely low pricing with no MOQ justification | Indicates substandard materials or middlemen padding costs | Request cost breakdown and verify material grade (e.g., virgin polypropylene) |
| Generic product photos or stock images | Lack of transparency; possible misrepresentation | Require real-time video tour or on-site inspection |
| Inconsistent communication or lack of technical detail | Poor quality control and limited customization | Engage only with technically fluent teams |
| No experience exporting to regulated markets (US/EU) | Risk of non-compliance with labeling, sterility, or documentation requirements | Prioritize suppliers with proven export history |
| Pressure for large upfront payments (e.g., 100% TT) | High financial risk; potential scam indicator | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) or LC |
Best Practices for Secure Sourcing
- Use Escrow or Letter of Credit (LC): Minimize financial risk on initial orders.
- Start with a Trial Order: Validate quality and logistics before scaling.
- Conduct Annual Audits: Ensure continued compliance and performance.
- Include Quality Clauses in Contracts: Define acceptable defect rates, testing protocols, and remedies for non-conformance.
- Leverage Third-Party Inspections: Pre-shipment inspections (PSI) for every batch.
Conclusion
Identifying a genuine centrifuge tube manufacturer in China requires due diligence beyond online profiles and supplier claims. By following the verification steps above, procurement managers can mitigate risk, ensure regulatory compliance, and establish long-term partnerships with capable, transparent manufacturers. Trading companies are not inherently problematic—many add value—but should be disclosed and vetted accordingly.
SourcifyChina recommends that all high-volume or regulated-market buyers prioritize factory-direct partnerships supported by on-site audits and independent testing.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Supply Chain Integrity | China Sourcing Experts
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Optimizing Lab Consumables Procurement
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026
The Critical Challenge: Mitigating Risk in Precision Lab Supply Chains
Global procurement of regulated medical consumables (e.g., centrifuge tubes) faces acute challenges:
– 74% of sourcing delays stem from supplier validation failures (Gartner, 2025)
– Unverified manufacturers cause 58% of non-compliance incidents in diagnostic supply chains (MD+DI)
– Average 90+ hours wasted per procurement cycle vetting Chinese suppliers internally
Traditional sourcing methods expose organizations to:
⚠️ Counterfeit certifications | ⚠️ Production halts due to quality deviations | ⚠️ 3-6 month timeline overruns
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates 82% of Sourcing Risk for Centrifuge Tube Procurement
Our AI-validated supplier network delivers time-to-market acceleration through rigorous, ongoing due diligence:
| Procurement Phase | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 8-12 weeks | < 72 hours | 87% |
| Compliance Verification (ISO 13485, USP Class VI) | Manual document chase | Pre-validated digital dossier | 100% |
| Production Audit | $8,500+ per trip | Live factory cam + 3rd-party reports | $12,200 avg. |
| Sample Qualification | 3-5 iterations | Pre-tested batch samples | 63% |
Key Differentiators for Centrifuge Tube Sourcing:
✅ Sterility Assurance: All Pro List partners undergo annual microbial contamination audits (ISO 11737)
✅ Material Traceability: Full polycarbonate/PP resin batch tracking from Sinopec/LG Chem
✅ Regulatory Shield: FDA 21 CFR Part 820 & CE MDR documentation pre-loaded in SourcifyHub™
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our centrifuge tube supplier onboarding from 14 weeks to 11 days – critical for our pandemic-response diagnostics rollout.”
— Senior Procurement Director, Top 5 IVD Manufacturer (2025 Client Case Study)
Your Action Imperative: Secure Uninterrupted Lab Supply Chains in 2026
With global lab consumable demand growing at 9.3% CAGR (Grand View Research), delaying supplier optimization risks:
– Lost revenue from delayed clinical trials
– Regulatory penalties from non-compliant materials
– Reputational damage from inconsistent product performance
SourcifyChina guarantees:
🔹 72-hour supplier shortlist for centrifuge tubes (0.5mL – 50mL, conical/round bottom)
🔹 Zero-cost validation – Pay only after sample approval
🔹 Dedicated sourcing engineer managing QC, logistics, and compliance
Next Steps: Activate Your Verified Supply Chain in < 48 Hours
Do not risk another procurement cycle with unvetted suppliers. Our team is ready to deploy:
- Immediate Access: Receive your custom Pro List report (including 3 pre-qualified centrifuge tube manufacturers)
- Risk-Free Validation: Request free sample kits with full CoA/CoC documentation
- Timeline Lock: Secure Q2 2026 capacity before March 31
Contact our Sourcing Engineering Team Today:
📧 [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 support in EN/DE/JP)
“The cost of not using SourcifyChina’s Pro List isn’t the procurement budget – it’s the $2.1M in delayed trial revenue we avoided last quarter.”
— VP Supply Chain, Global Biotech Leader
Act now to lock Q2 production slots. 87% of our Pro List capacity is reserved 90+ days in advance.
SourcifyChina is the only ISO 9001:2015-certified sourcing platform exclusively serving regulated medical device procurement. All supplier data refreshed quarterly via blockchain-verified factory audits.
© 2026 SourcifyChina | Data-Driven Sourcing for Regulated Industries
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.