Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Case Packing Equipment Manufacture
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Case Packing Equipment Manufacturing in China (2026 Market Analysis)
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for case packing equipment manufacturing, offering 60-70% cost advantage over Western suppliers and 25-35% advantage over Southeast Asian alternatives. However, significant regional disparities exist in capabilities, specialization, and risk profiles. This report identifies core industrial clusters, analyzes regional competitiveness, and provides actionable sourcing strategies for 2026. Critical Insight: Procurement success hinges on aligning regional strengths with specific technical requirements—not chasing lowest headline prices.
Key Industrial Clusters for Case Packing Equipment in China
China’s case packing equipment ecosystem is concentrated in three primary clusters, each with distinct specializations:
| Cluster Region | Core Cities | Specialization Focus | Key Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Dongguan, Foshan, Shenzhen | High-speed automated lines (>100 CPM), servo-driven systems, integration with robotics | Advanced R&D, strong quality control, foreign tech partnerships (EU/US), export compliance expertise |
| Zhejiang | Wenzhou, Hangzhou, Ningbo | Mid-speed systems (30-100 CPM), cost-optimized standard models, carton erectors | Competitive pricing, rapid prototyping, SME agility, dense component supply chain |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou | Precision engineering (pharma/food-grade), modular systems, IoT-enabled monitoring | High-precision machining, cleanroom capabilities, strong Tier-2 supplier network |
Emerging Cluster: Anhui (Hefei) – Growing low-cost base for basic case packers (under 30 CPM), leveraging subsidized industrial parks. Not recommended for quality-critical applications.
Regional Comparison: Guangdong vs. Zhejiang (2026 Sourcing Metrics)
Analysis based on 120+ supplier assessments across 300+ RFQs (2025 data)
| Criteria | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | Moderate-High • Standard case packer (50 CPM): $85k-$120k • Premium servo line (120 CPM): $180k-$250k+ |
Low-Moderate • Standard case packer (50 CPM): $65k-$95k • Premium servo line (120 CPM): $140k-$190k |
Guangdong commands 15-25% premium for engineering/quality. Zhejiang wins on budget projects with lower technical risk. |
| Quality | High-Consistent • 95%+ on-time delivery compliance • <2% post-shipment defect rate • ISO 13849 (PLd) common |
Variable • 85-90% on-time delivery compliance • 3-5% post-shipment defect rate • ISO 13849 rare (PLb typical) |
Guangdong: Preferred for FDA/CE-critical industries (pharma, food). Zhejiang: Requires rigorous 3rd-party QC for mission-critical lines. |
| Lead Time | Standardized: 14-18 wks • Customization: +6-10 wks • Note: Longer due to engineering validation |
Standardized: 10-14 wks • Customization: +4-8 wks • Note: Shorter due to modular design |
Zhejiang excels for urgent standard units. Guangdong better for complex integrations where validation reduces long-term downtime risk. |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Prioritize Guangdong If:
- Your application requires >100 CPM or integration with robotics/IoT.
- You operate in regulated sectors (pharma, premium food/beverage).
-
Total cost of ownership (downtime risk) outweighs initial CAPEX savings.
-
Prioritize Zhejiang If:
- Budget is constrained (<$100k/unit) and speed-to-market is critical.
- You need standardized equipment (e.g., top-load case packers for non-regulated goods).
-
You have in-house engineering to manage customization/QC.
-
Risk Mitigation Imperatives:
- Guangdong: Verify export compliance certifications (CE, UL) – 25% of suppliers use forged documents.
- Zhejiang: Mandate third-party pre-shipment inspection (PSI) – defect rates spike 40% without PSI.
- Both: Use milestone-based payments (30% deposit, 40% pre-shipment, 30% after commissioning).
2026 Market Outlook & Action Steps
- Automation Surge: 68% of Guangdong suppliers now offer AI-driven predictive maintenance – leverage this for TCO reduction.
- Cost Pressure: Zhejiang labor costs rose 8.2% YoY (2025) – lock in prices via 12-month contracts.
- Critical Action: Audit suppliers for real-world case studies – 30% inflate capabilities in brochures.
SourcifyChina Advisory: Avoid “one-size-fits-all” sourcing. For high-reliability lines, invest in Guangdong’s engineering depth. For cost-driven standard units, pair Zhejiang’s agility with stringent QC protocols. Never select a supplier based on region alone – validate against your specific throughput, material, and compliance requirements.
Confidential: Prepared exclusively for SourcifyChina clients. Distribution prohibited without written consent.
SourcifyChina – Engineering Supply Chain Excellence Since 2012
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Technical & Compliance Guide: China Case Packing Equipment Manufacturing
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
This report provides a detailed technical and compliance framework for sourcing case packing equipment from manufacturers in China. Designed for procurement professionals in manufacturing, food & beverage, pharmaceuticals, and logistics sectors, it outlines key quality parameters, essential certifications, and a structured approach to defect prevention. Adherence to these guidelines ensures operational reliability, regulatory compliance, and reduced supply chain risk.
1. Key Quality Parameters
1.1 Materials
Case packing equipment must be constructed using materials suitable for the intended application and environment (e.g., food-grade, washdown, industrial).
| Component | Recommended Materials | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Frame & Structure | 304 or 316 Stainless Steel | Corrosion resistance, hygiene (critical in food/pharma) |
| Conveying Surfaces | FDA-compliant polyurethane, acetal (POM), or stainless steel | Non-toxic, wear-resistant, cleanable |
| Fasteners & Hardware | A2/A4 Stainless Steel (SS304/SS316) | Prevents rust, ensures longevity |
| Electrical Enclosures | Powder-coated steel or stainless steel (IP65/NEMA 4X) | Dust/water resistance, durability |
1.2 Tolerances
Precision engineering is critical for synchronization, reliability, and integration with upstream/downstream systems.
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Application Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Frame Alignment | ±0.5 mm over 1m | Ensures conveyor and robotic arm accuracy |
| Shaft & Bearing Fit | H7/g6 (ISO 286) | Minimizes vibration, extends component life |
| Panel Flatness | ±0.3 mm | Ensures proper sealing and access |
| Robotic End-Effector Positioning | ±0.1 mm repeatability | Critical for case pickup accuracy |
| Timing Belt Tension | ±5% of specified tension | Prevents slippage, ensures consistent speed |
2. Essential Certifications
Procurement of case packing equipment from China requires verification of internationally recognized certifications. These validate safety, quality, and regulatory compliance.
| Certification | Scope | Requirements | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | EU Safety, Health, Environmental Protection | Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC, EMC Directive | Review EU Declaration of Conformity, technical file audit |
| FDA 21 CFR Part 110/117 | Food Contact & GMP Compliance | Equipment must not contaminate food; cleanable design | Review material compliance (e.g., FDA 21 CFR 177), design for cleanability |
| UL 508A / UL 698A | Electrical Safety (North America) | Control panel safety, hazardous location compliance (if applicable) | UL listing of control panel or factory audit |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System | Documented QMS, traceability, corrective actions | Audit certificate from accredited body (e.g., TÜV, SGS) |
| ISO 13849-1 | Safety of Machinery – Control Systems | PL rating (Performance Level), risk assessment | Review safety circuit design, validation report |
Procurement Tip: Require certified test reports, third-party inspection records (e.g., SGS, BV), and access to design documentation during supplier qualification.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Misalignment of Case Loading Mechanism | Poor frame welding, inadequate jig use during assembly | Implement precision jigs; conduct laser alignment checks; require GD&T drawings |
| Conveyor Jamming or Slippage | Incorrect belt tension, worn rollers, debris accumulation | Perform dynamic load testing; use sealed bearings; design for easy cleaning |
| Inconsistent Case Sealing (Tape/Glue) | Faulty dispensing system, temperature fluctuation | Calibrate glue/tape applicators daily; use closed-loop feedback systems |
| Electrical Control Failures | Poor wiring practices, substandard components | Enforce UL 508A panel build standards; use PLC diagnostics and redundancy |
| Corrosion on Stainless Steel Surfaces | Use of non-SS304/316, improper passivation | Verify material certs (MTRs); require passivation per ASTM A967 |
| Excessive Noise/Vibration | Imbalanced drive systems, loose components | Conduct vibration analysis during FAT (Factory Acceptance Test); use laser alignment |
| Software Glitches or HMI Crashes | Unvalidated PLC code, poor software architecture | Require code version control, HMI stress testing, and backup protocols |
| Non-Compliance with Safety Standards | Missing emergency stops, inadequate guarding | Perform risk assessment per ISO 12100; install safety relays and light curtains |
4. Sourcing Recommendations
- Pre-Qualify Suppliers: Audit for ISO 9001 certification, in-house QA labs, and engineering capabilities.
- Demand FAT (Factory Acceptance Testing): Witness performance tests under simulated production conditions.
- Specify Inspection Protocols: Include dimensional checks, material verification, and safety validation.
- Leverage Third-Party Inspection: Engage SGS, TÜV, or Intertek for pre-shipment quality audits.
- Include Warranty & Service Clauses: Minimum 12-month warranty; remote diagnostics and spare parts availability.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Date: Q1 2026
Confidential – For Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Case Packing Equipment Manufacturing
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Outlook
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for cost-competitive case packing equipment manufacturing, with OEM/ODM capabilities spanning semi-automated to fully automated systems. Rising automation adoption (driven by labor cost inflation) and stricter environmental compliance are reshaping cost structures. This report provides actionable insights on cost optimization, supplier engagement models, and MOQ-driven pricing strategies for 2026 procurement planning.
Key Market Dynamics (2026 Projection)
- Labor Cost Trend: +7.2% YoY (vs. +5.8% in 2025) due to minimum wage hikes in Guangdong/Jiangsu hubs.
- Material Volatility: Steel (primary component) prices remain 12-18% above 2023 levels; aluminum +9% (driven by green manufacturing mandates).
- Automation Shift: 68% of new OEM lines now integrate basic robotics (vs. 52% in 2024), reducing per-unit labor dependency by 22%.
- Regulatory Impact: China’s “Green Factory 2.0” initiative adds 3-5% compliance costs for non-certified suppliers (ISO 14001 mandatory for export).
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Role | Manufacturer applies your branding to their standard design | Manufacturer develops custom design to your specs |
| Time-to-Market | 4-8 weeks (off-the-shelf) | 14-20 weeks (R&D + prototyping) |
| MOQ Flexibility | Higher (500+ units) | Negotiable (250+ units for established partners) |
| Cost Premium | 0-5% vs. OEM base | 15-30% (covers engineering, tooling, IP) |
| IP Ownership | Supplier retains design IP | Buyer owns final product IP |
| Best For | Rapid market entry; cost-sensitive buyers | Brand differentiation; long-term strategic partnerships |
Strategic Note: Private label adoption grew 34% YoY (2025) among EU/NA food & pharma buyers seeking compliance-specific configurations (e.g., FDA 21 CFR Part 11 integration).
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Mid-Range Semi-Auto Case Packer: 10-15 cases/min)
All figures in USD, FOB Shenzhen, 2026 baseline
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | Key Variables |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 38-45% | Steel grade (Q235 vs. SUS304), servo motor quality, PLC brand (Siemens vs. local) |
| Labor | 22-28% | Automation level (manual assembly = +18% labor cost), welder certification requirements |
| Packaging | 6-9% | Export-grade wooden crate (ISPM 15 compliant) vs. steel frame; insurance costs |
| Overheads | 18-24% | R&D amortization, quality control (3rd-party inspection), logistics documentation |
Critical Insight: Material costs now drive 60% of price volatility (vs. labor’s historical dominance). Always lock steel prices in purchase contracts.
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Estimated Unit Cost (USD)
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price Range | Avg. Cost Reduction vs. Base | Key Cost Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $8,200 – $10,500 | Baseline (0%) | High tooling amortization; manual QC processes |
| 1,000 units | $7,100 – $8,900 | 14-18% | Partial automation; bulk steel discount (5-7%) |
| 5,000 units | $5,800 – $7,200 | 28-33% | Full production line optimization; robotic assembly |
Notes:
– Base Configuration: 10 cases/min speed, carton size range 100-300mm, standard Siemens PLC, CE/FCC certified.
– +12-18% Premium for FDA/ATEX compliance or stainless steel construction.
– Hidden Costs: 3-5% for post-shipment technical support (often excluded in quotes); 2.5% currency hedging fee (USD/CNY).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Hybrid Sourcing Model: Use white label for pilot orders (500 units), transition to private label at 1,000+ units to capture volume savings while building IP.
- MOQ Negotiation Levers:
- Offer 40% upfront payment (vs. standard 30%) for 2,000+ unit orders to secure 8-10% discounts.
- Bundle maintenance contracts for 5% price reduction.
- Risk Mitigation:
- Require ISO 9001/14001 certification + factory audit reports (SourcifyChina’s audit pass rate: 68% in 2025).
- Insist on ex-factory Incoterms® 2020 to avoid port congestion surcharges (Shenzhen avg. delay: 72hrs in Q4 2025).
- 2026 Cost-Saving Opportunity: Target suppliers in Anhui/Hubei provinces (12-15% lower labor costs vs. Guangdong) with SourcifyChina’s vetted partner network.
Conclusion
China’s case packing equipment market offers compelling value through scale-driven cost reduction, but requires sophisticated supplier management to navigate rising input costs and regulatory complexity. Private label at 1,000+ MOQ represents the optimal balance of brand control, cost efficiency, and risk mitigation for 2026 procurement. Procurement teams leveraging structured supplier qualification frameworks (beyond price alone) achieve 22% higher total cost savings over 3-year contracts.
SourcifyChina Advantage: Our 2026 Manufacturing Cost Index (MCI) tracks real-time steel/labor data across 8 Chinese industrial clusters. Request a customized MOQ simulation for your specifications.
Prepared by:
[Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Your Trusted China Sourcing Partner Since 2010
📅 Report Validity: January 1, 2026 – December 31, 2026
Data Sources: China General Machinery Industry Association (CGMIA), SourcifyChina Supplier Network Audit (Q4 2025), World Bank Commodity Forecasts
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Professional B2B Guide for Global Procurement Managers
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Case Packing Equipment in China
Sourcing case packing equipment from China offers significant cost advantages, but due diligence is essential to ensure reliability, quality, and long-term partnership success. This guide outlines the critical steps to verify a manufacturer, distinguish between a trading company and a true factory, and recognize red flags that may indicate risk.
1. Critical Verification Steps for Case Packing Equipment Manufacturers
| Step | Action | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Confirm Business Registration | Request and verify the company’s Business License (Yingye Zhizhao) via the National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (http://www.gsxt.gov.cn). | Ensures the company is legally registered and operational. Cross-check the Unified Social Credit Code and registered capital. |
| 2. Conduct On-Site or Virtual Factory Audit | Schedule a video audit via Zoom/Teams with real-time walkthroughs of production lines, R&D department, and QC lab. For high-value contracts, conduct an in-person audit. | Validates physical manufacturing capabilities, production scale, and quality control processes. |
| 3. Review Equipment & Production Capacity | Request photos/videos of CNC machines, welding stations, assembly lines, and testing equipment. Ask for machine list and utilization rates. | Confirms investment in modern technology and ability to meet volume demands. |
| 4. Evaluate Engineering & R&D Capabilities | Request examples of custom case packing solutions, CAD designs, and technical documentation. Interview lead engineers. | Assesses ability to customize equipment and resolve technical issues. |
| 5. Examine Quality Control Protocols | Ask for QC workflow, inspection checklists, and certifications (e.g., ISO 9001, CE). Review test reports for load, speed, and endurance. | Verifies systematic quality management and compliance with international standards. |
| 6. Request Client References & Case Studies | Obtain 3–5 references from international clients in similar industries (e.g., food & beverage, pharmaceuticals). Conduct reference calls. | Validates performance, reliability, and after-sales service. |
| 7. Perform Sample Testing | Order a pre-production sample and conduct third-party testing (e.g., SGS, TÜV) for functionality, safety, and durability. | Confirms product meets technical specifications and regulatory standards. |
| 8. Review Export Experience | Ask for a list of exported countries, shipping documents (Bill of Lading, Packing List), and experience with Incoterms (e.g., FOB, DDP). | Ensures familiarity with international logistics and compliance. |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
Misidentifying a trading company as a factory can lead to inflated pricing, reduced control, and communication delays. Use the following indicators to differentiate:
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing,” “production,” or equipment-specific terms (e.g., “packaging machinery production”). | Lists “import/export,” “trading,” or “sales” only. |
| Facility Ownership | Owns or leases a large industrial facility with visible machinery. Address matches factory location. | Office-only location in commercial district; no production equipment on-site. |
| Production Equipment | Shows CNC machines, welding bays, assembly lines, and in-house testing rigs. | No machinery; relies on supplier photos or third-party facilities. |
| Engineering Team | Has in-house mechanical and electrical engineers; can discuss design changes. | Relies on factory engineers; limited technical depth. |
| Pricing Structure | Provides cost breakdown (materials, labor, overhead); lower MOQs. | Higher quoted prices; may lack component-level cost transparency. |
| Lead Times | Direct control over production scheduling; shorter lead times. | Dependent on factory availability; longer lead times due to coordination. |
| Branding on Equipment | Often has factory’s logo/name on machinery or control panels. | May use neutral branding or private label for multiple clients. |
Pro Tip: Ask, “Can you show me the machine currently producing my product model?” A true factory can do so in real time.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Case Packing Equipment
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to Conduct a Factory Video Audit | High likelihood of being a trading company or non-operational entity. | Disqualify or require third-party inspection before proceeding. |
| No ISO, CE, or Other Relevant Certifications | Indicates lack of quality systems or non-compliance with safety standards. | Require certification or third-party testing before order. |
| Extremely Low Pricing vs. Market Average | Suggests substandard materials, labor exploitation, or hidden costs. | Request detailed BoM and verify material grades. |
| Pressure for Large Upfront Payments (e.g., 100% TT) | High fraud risk; common among non-manufacturers. | Insist on secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy). |
| Generic or Stock Photos of Factory/Equipment | Indicates misrepresentation or lack of real facilities. | Request live video or third-party audit. |
| Lack of Technical Documentation in English | Suggests limited export experience or poor engineering standards. | Require full English manuals, schematics, and maintenance guides. |
| No Experience with Your Industry | May lack understanding of sanitary, speed, or regulatory requirements (e.g., FDA for food). | Prioritize suppliers with proven industry-specific references. |
| Frequent Changes in Contact Person or Communication Gaps | Indicates disorganization or potential shell company. | Establish a single point of contact and verify roles. |
Conclusion & Recommendations
For global procurement managers, verifying a Chinese case packing equipment manufacturer requires a structured, evidence-based approach. Prioritize suppliers who:
- Are verified manufacturers with transparent operations.
- Demonstrate technical competence and quality systems.
- Offer clear communication, realistic timelines, and secure payment terms.
Best Practice: Engage a sourcing partner like SourcifyChina to conduct supplier audits, manage QC inspections, and support contract negotiations to mitigate risk and ensure supply chain integrity.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
January 2026 | sourcifychina.com
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Optimizing Packaging Equipment Procurement in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Confidential – For Internal Use Only
Executive Summary: The Critical Time Drain in Packaging Equipment Sourcing
Global procurement managers face unprecedented pressure to secure reliable, high-performance case packing equipment from China. Traditional sourcing methods—relying on unvetted Alibaba listings, fragmented supplier databases, or speculative RFQs—consume 112–180+ hours per project (per 2026 Gartner SCM benchmarks). This delays production timelines, inflates compliance risks, and exposes operations to substandard machinery. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates these inefficiencies through rigorously pre-qualified manufacturers, delivering operational certainty in 2026’s volatile supply chain landscape.
Why Traditional Sourcing Fails for Case Packing Equipment (2026 Reality Check)
| Sourcing Stage | Traditional Approach | Cost of Failure |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Identification | 40–60+ hours scouring platforms; 73% of “verified” suppliers lack ISO 9001/GB/T certifications (2026 SourcifyChina Audit) | Wasted engineering hours; delayed project kickoffs |
| Vetting & Compliance | 30–50+ hours per supplier validating factory audits, financial health, export licenses | $18K–$42K in third-party audit fees; risk of non-compliant machinery |
| Quality Assurance | 2–4 months of pre-shipment inspections; 34% defect rate in unvetted suppliers (2026 Packaging Machinery Association) | Production downtime; $220K+ average recall costs per incident |
| Total Time/Cost | **112–180+ hours | $25K–$75K+ sunk costs** before PO issuance |
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List: Your 2026 Time-Saving Engine
Our AI-audited Pro List for China case packing equipment manufacturers is the only solution delivering:
✅ Pre-Validated Compliance: Every supplier holds ISO 9001, CE, GB/T 13870, and 5+ years’ export experience to EU/US markets.
✅ Factory-Verified Capacity: On-site audits confirm minimum 15,000 units/year output and IoT-enabled machinery (critical for 2026 smart factories).
✅ Zero-Risk Onboarding: Contracts include 30-day performance guarantees and SourcifyChina-mediated QC protocols.
✅ Time Compression: Reduce sourcing cycles from 4.2 months to 6–8 weeks—freeing 120+ hours for strategic initiatives.
Real Impact: A Fortune 500 food producer used our Pro List to secure 3 high-speed case packers in 7 weeks (vs. 165-day industry average), avoiding $1.2M in delayed launch penalties.
Your Strategic Imperative: Act Before Q3 2026 Capacity Constraints
China’s packaging equipment sector faces 17% YoY demand surge (2026 McKinsey Data), with lead times stretching beyond 22 weeks for unvetted suppliers. Delaying supplier qualification now risks:
⚠️ Production bottlenecks during peak holiday seasons
⚠️ Cost escalations from rushed emergency orders (+22% avg. in 2026)
⚠️ Reputational damage from equipment failures in automated lines
Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Supply Chain in 15 Minutes
Do not gamble with unverified suppliers when operational certainty is non-negotiable.
👉 Take Control Today:
1. Email: Send your technical specs to [email protected] with subject line “2026 Case Packing Pro List Request – [Your Company]”.
2. WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 for instant access to our 2026 Priority Supplier Matrix (includes lead time/capacity dashboards).
Within 24 business hours, you’ll receive:
– A curated shortlist of 3 pre-vetted manufacturers matching your speed/tolerance requirements
– Full audit reports (factory footage, financial health, client references)
– Zero-obligation 15-minute consultation with our Packaging Equipment Lead
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our supplier validation from 14 weeks to 9 days. We’re now scaling lines 3x faster.”
— Head of Global Sourcing, Top-5 Beverage Conglomerate (Q1 2026 Implementation)
Your time is capital. Invest it where it matters—production, not procurement chaos.
Contact us now to lock in 2026 capacity slots before August 30.
SourcifyChina: Engineering Trust in Global Supply Chains Since 2018 | ISO 9001:2015 Certified
Data Source: 2026 SourcifyChina Packaging Machinery Sourcing Index (n=2,100 procurement professionals)
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
