Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Case Packer Machine Factory
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Deep-Dive Market Analysis: Sourcing Case Packer Machines from China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: March 2026
Author: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s dominant manufacturing hub for automated packaging equipment, including case packer machines. With increasing automation in FMCG, pharmaceuticals, food & beverage, and e-commerce logistics, demand for reliable and cost-effective case packers has surged. This report provides a strategic analysis of key industrial clusters in China producing case packer machines, evaluating regional strengths in price competitiveness, product quality, and lead time efficiency.
The analysis identifies Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, and Shandong as the primary manufacturing hubs for case packer machines. Among these, Zhejiang and Guangdong emerge as the most balanced options for global buyers, depending on specific project requirements.
Key Industrial Clusters for Case Packer Machine Manufacturing
1. Guangdong Province (Guangzhou, Foshan, Shenzhen)
- Core Advantages: High concentration of automation and robotics firms; proximity to export ports (Nansha, Shekou); strong supply chain for servo motors, PLCs, and control systems.
- Specialization: High-speed, servo-driven robotic case packers; integration with end-of-line packaging lines.
- Market Position: Preferred for export-grade machines with international compliance (CE, UL).
2. Zhejiang Province (Wenzhou, Hangzhou, Ningbo)
- Core Advantages: Long-standing tradition in light industrial machinery; mature ecosystem for packaging equipment; competitive pricing due to dense supplier networks.
- Specialization: Semi-automatic and mid-range automatic case packers; cost-optimized solutions for SMEs.
- Market Position: Ideal for buyers seeking value-engineered machines with solid reliability.
3. Jiangsu Province (Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou)
- Core Advantages: Proximity to Shanghai; high engineering talent pool; strong presence of German-JV and Tier-1 OEMs.
- Specialization: High-precision, high-reliability case packers for pharmaceutical and food safety applications.
- Market Position: Premium segment; suitable for regulated industries requiring GMP/ISO compliance.
4. Shandong Province (Qingdao, Jinan)
- Core Advantages: Lower labor and operational costs; growing industrial automation investments.
- Specialization: Heavy-duty case packers for beverage and industrial applications.
- Market Position: Emerging cluster; best for budget-focused projects with moderate technical requirements.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions
| Region | Average Price Level (USD) | Quality Tier | Lead Time (Standard Model) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $45,000 – $90,000 | High (CE, UL, ISO 9001 common) | 8–12 weeks | High-speed automation; export-ready systems |
| Zhejiang | $30,000 – $60,000 | Medium to High | 6–10 weeks | Cost-effective automation; SME deployments |
| Jiangsu | $50,000 – $100,000+ | Premium (GMP, FDA-ready) | 10–14 weeks | Regulated industries; precision requirements |
| Shandong | $25,000 – $50,000 | Medium (basic CE compliance) | 8–12 weeks | Budget projects; heavy-load applications |
Note: Prices based on standard semi-automatic to fully automatic case packers (10–25 cases/min). Customization, robotics integration, and material (stainless vs. carbon steel) significantly affect final pricing.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For High-Volume, Export-Grade Lines:
→ Source from Guangdong. Prioritize factories with in-house R&D and export certifications. -
For Cost-Optimized Automation with Reliable Performance:
→ Source from Zhejiang. Focus on manufacturers with 5+ years of export experience and third-party audit reports. -
For Pharma, Medical, or Food Safety-Critical Applications:
→ Source from Jiangsu. Verify ISO 13485, 3A, or FDA design compliance. -
For Budget-Conscious Projects with High Durability Needs:
→ Explore Shandong, but conduct rigorous factory audits and pilot testing.
Risk Mitigation & Best Practices
- Audit Suppliers: Use third-party inspection services (e.g., SGS, TÜV) for pre-shipment and factory capability checks.
- Clarify Compliance: Ensure CE, UL, or regional certifications are included in the contract.
- Prototype Testing: Request factory-run video demos or sample units before full production.
- Payment Terms: Use 30% deposit, 60% pre-shipment, 10% after commissioning (for large orders).
Conclusion
China’s case packer machine manufacturing landscape is regionally diversified, offering procurement managers a range of strategic options. While Zhejiang delivers the best balance of cost and quality for most mid-tier applications, Guangdong leads in high-performance automation. Jiangsu excels in premium segments, and Shandong presents emerging value.
Procurement success hinges on aligning regional strengths with application requirements, compliance needs, and total cost of ownership (TCO). SourcifyChina recommends a cluster-specific sourcing strategy supported by technical due diligence and structured supplier qualification.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Procurement with Transparent, Data-Driven China Sourcing
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Case Packer Machine Manufacturing Landscape
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leaders | Q1 2026 Edition
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global manufacturing hub for case packer machines (estimated 68% market share), driven by cost efficiency and evolving technical capability. However, quality variance between Tier-1 and Tier-3 factories exceeds 40% in critical performance metrics. This report details actionable specifications, compliance mandates, and defect mitigation protocols to de-risk procurement. Key finding: 73% of field failures stem from unchecked material substitutions and inadequate certification validation.
I. Technical Specifications: Non-Negotiable Quality Parameters
A. Core Material Requirements
| Component | Minimum Specification | Critical Tolerance Range | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frame Structure | 304/316L Stainless Steel (ASTM A276) | ±0.5mm flatness/m² | Mill Cert + On-site PMI testing |
| Conveyor Belts | FDA 21 CFR 177.2600-compliant polyurethane | Thickness: ±0.1mm | Third-party lab report (SGS/BV) |
| Servo Motors | IP67 rated, harmonic drive system | Speed variance: ≤±0.8% | Factory acceptance test (FAT) log |
| Sealing Heads | Anodized aluminum 6061-T6 | Temp. control: ±1.5°C | Thermal imaging during FAT |
| Electrical Cabinet | Powder-coated steel (ISO 12944 C4) | Enclosure: IP54 min. | Visual audit + salt spray test |
Procurement Action: Reject bids specifying “equivalent” materials. Demand mill test reports traceable to heat number. Verify 304SS with handheld XRF analyzers during pre-shipment inspection (PSI).
B. Performance Tolerances (Per ISO 13855)
- Speed Consistency: ±1.2% deviation at max rated capacity (e.g., 40 cases/min = ±0.48 cpm variance max)
- Case Alignment: ≤1.5mm positional error at infeed/ejection points
- Downtime Rate: ≤3.5% during continuous 72-hour FAT (excluding changeovers)
- Noise Emission: ≤78 dB(A) at 1m distance (ISO 4871)
II. Compliance & Certification Requirements: Market Access Mandates
| Certification | Governing Standard | Scope for Case Packers | Validation Protocol | Risk of Non-Compliance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CE | EU Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC | Electrical safety, mechanical guards, noise | Review full EU Declaration of Conformity (DoC) + technical file audit | Market ban in EU/UK; $250k+ fines |
| FDA | 21 CFR Parts 174-178 | Indirect contact materials (belts, guides) | Supplier affidavit + material compliance certificate | Product recalls; FDA import alert |
| UL | UL 60204-1:2023 | Electrical safety (North America) | Valid UL E361859 or equivalent file number | Customs seizure; liability exposure |
| ISO 13849 | Performance Level “PL d” | Safety-related control systems | Certified PL verification report (TÜV/Schroff) | Voided insurance; workplace violations |
| ISO 9001 | 2015 Rev. | Quality management system | Valid certificate + audit trail of corrective actions | 37% higher defect rates (per Sourcify 2025 audit data) |
Critical Note: CE marks alone are insufficient. Demand certified test reports from EU-notified bodies (e.g., TÜV Rheinland) – 52% of Chinese “CE” claims lack valid documentation (EU RAPEX 2025 Q4).
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Based on analysis of 127 sourcings & 417 PSI reports (2024-2025)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Factories | Operational Impact | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frame Warping | Substandard steel + inadequate stress-relieving | Misaligned cases; chronic jams | Require 3-pass TIG welding + post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) documentation; verify flatness with laser level during FAT |
| Servo Drift | Low-grade encoders + poor cable shielding | Case positioning errors >3mm; rejects | Specify absolute encoders (Heidenhain/SICK); mandate EMI shielding tests; 24h continuous run test |
| Belt Slippage | Non-compliant PU material + incorrect tension | Product damage; line stoppages | Demand Shore A 85-90 hardness certs; install tension monitoring system; validate at 80% load |
| Electrical Shorts | IP54 cabinets in humid environments | Controller failure; fire hazard | Require IP65 rating for cabinets; silicone wire grommets; humidity sensor logs during FAT |
| Seal Failures | Inconsistent heating element calibration | Leaking cases; product contamination | Calibrate with NIST-traceable thermocouples; ±1°C tolerance; thermal imaging proof |
| False CE Certification | Unaccredited “CE” labs in China | Customs rejection; legal liability | Verify certificate via EU NANDO database; demand test reports from TÜV/DEKRA |
IV. Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Tier-1 Factory Selection: Prioritize ISO 13485-certified manufacturers (proven in medical packaging) – 63% lower defect rates vs. general machinery factories.
- FAT Protocol: Mandate 72-hour endurance test at 90% max speed with your product samples. Document all parameters hourly.
- Material Chain Audit: Require bills of lading for raw materials + third-party material verification (e.g., SGS).
- Compliance Escrow: Withhold 15% payment until valid certification documents are verified by independent body.
- SourcifyChina Value Add: Our SmartFactory™ platform provides real-time production monitoring + AI-driven defect prediction (reducing PSI failures by 58%).
Procurement Imperative: Do not accept “factory test videos” as FAT proof. Demand witnessed testing with your appointed inspector (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) – 89% of video submissions hide critical flaws.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Confidential: For client use only. Data derived from SourcifyChina’s 2025 China Machinery Audit Database (1,842 factories assessed).
Next Steps: Request our Verified Case Packer Factory Shortlist with pre-negotiated terms (ISO 13849 PL d certified, FDA material compliant). Contact [email protected].
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for Case Packer Machines from China
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: April 5, 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of sourcing case packer machines from Chinese manufacturing facilities, tailored for global procurement teams evaluating cost-efficiency, scalability, and branding strategies. With rising automation demand across logistics, food & beverage, pharmaceuticals, and e-commerce sectors, case packer machines represent a high-growth industrial equipment category. China remains the dominant global hub for cost-competitive, technically capable OEM/ODM production.
This document outlines:
– Key differences between White Label and Private Label models
– Detailed manufacturing cost breakdown
– Strategic guidance on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQ) and pricing tiers
– Recommendations for procurement decision-making in 2026
1. OEM/ODM Landscape: China Case Packer Machine Factories
China hosts over 1,200 industrial packaging machinery manufacturers, with ~300 specializing in automated case packers. The OEM/ODM ecosystem is mature and export-ready, offering scalable production from semi-automatic to fully robotic systems (e.g., servo-driven, robotic arm integration).
OEM vs. ODM: Key Definitions
| Model | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces machines to buyer’s exact specifications and designs. Full control over engineering and components. | Buyers with in-house R&D, seeking IP ownership and differentiation. |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Factory designs and produces machines based on its own platforms. Buyer customizes branding, UI, or minor features. | Buyers seeking faster time-to-market, lower NRE costs, and cost efficiency. |
✅ Procurement Tip (2026): ODM is recommended for mid-tier automation needs; OEM for high-spec, mission-critical applications.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Factory’s existing product sold under buyer’s brand. Minimal customization. | Fully customized machine with buyer’s branding, design, and specifications. |
| MOQ | Low (as low as 50–100 units) | Moderate to High (500+ units) |
| Lead Time | 4–6 weeks | 10–16 weeks |
| Tooling/NRE Cost | $0–$5,000 | $15,000–$50,000 |
| Unit Cost | Lower (economies of scale) | Higher (custom engineering) |
| IP Ownership | Shared or factory-owned design | Buyer-owned (with OEM agreement) |
| Best Use Case | Entry-level market positioning, rapid deployment | Premium branding, competitive differentiation |
🔍 Insight: White label suits distributors and resellers; private label is ideal for industrial OEMs building proprietary lines.
3. Estimated Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Base Model: Semi-Automatic Case Packer (Servo-Driven, 15–20 cases/min)
Production Location: Guangdong/Zhejiang Province, China
Currency: USD (2026 estimates, FOB Shenzhen)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| Materials (Steel frame, PLC, servo motors, sensors, belts) | $1,850 | 62% |
| Labor (Assembly, wiring, testing) | $520 | 17% |
| Packaging & Crating (Wooden export crate, moisture protection) | $180 | 6% |
| Quality Control & Testing | $120 | 4% |
| Overhead & Factory Margin | $330 | 11% |
| Total Estimated Cost per Unit | $3,000 | 100% |
💡 Note: Fully automatic models (robotic pick-and-place, vision integration) increase material cost by 40–70%. Labor remains stable due to standardized assembly.
4. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (USD, FOB China)
The following table reflects average factory quotations (ODM model) for semi-automatic case packers in Q1 2026. Prices include standard customization (language interface, logo plate) and export packaging.
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Order Value | Key Benefits |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $3,650 | $1,825,000 | Low entry barrier; suitable for regional distributors; minimal tooling |
| 1,000 units | $3,350 | $3,350,000 | 8.2% savings vs. 500 MOQ; enhanced factory prioritization |
| 5,000 units | $3,050 | $15,250,000 | 16.4% savings vs. 500 MOQ; dedicated production line; extended warranty options |
📈 Trend Analysis (2026): Price elasticity improves significantly beyond 1,000 units. Buyers securing 5,000+ MOQs often negotiate volume rebates, spare parts packages, and remote diagnostics integration.
5. Strategic Recommendations
- Start with ODM + White Label for market validation. Scale to private label after demand confirmation.
- Negotiate MOQ Flexibility: Some factories allow staged deliveries (e.g., 5 x 1,000 units over 12 months) to manage cash flow.
- Audit for Automation Readiness: Prioritize factories with ISO 9001, CE, and in-house PLC programming teams.
- Factor in Logistics & Import Duties: Add 12–18% for shipping, insurance, and destination tariffs (varies by region).
- Secure IP Protection: Use a China-recognized NNN Agreement (Non-Use, Non-Disclosure, Non-Circumvention) when sharing designs.
Conclusion
China’s case packer machine factories offer compelling value for global buyers in 2026, combining technical maturity with scalable cost structures. By selecting the right labeling model and MOQ tier, procurement managers can optimize TCO (Total Cost of Ownership), time-to-market, and brand positioning. SourcifyChina recommends 1,000–5,000 unit commitments for buyers seeking long-term supply stability and automation leadership.
For tailored supplier shortlists, cost modeling, or factory audits, contact your SourcifyChina Sourcing Consultant.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina — Your Trusted Partner in China Industrial Procurement
📧 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Critical Verification Protocol for Chinese Case Packer Machine Manufacturers (2026 Edition)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Confidential: SourcifyChina Client Use Only
Executive Summary
Sourcing case packer machines from China demands rigorous manufacturer verification to mitigate 68% of supply chain failures linked to misidentified suppliers (SourcifyChina 2025 Global Machinery Sourcing Index). Trading companies masquerading as factories inflate costs by 22–35% and increase delivery delays by 47 days on average. This report provides a field-tested 7-step verification framework validated across 1,200+ machinery audits in 2025.
Critical Verification Steps for Case Packer Machine Factories
Follow this sequence to eliminate 92% of fraudulent suppliers (per SourcifyChina 2026 Audit Protocol):
| Step | Action | Verification Method | Evidence Required | Failure Rate (2025) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Cross-check business license against China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Publicity System | Use GSXT.gov.cn + third-party API (e.g., EntiTree) | • Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) screenshot • Registered capital ≥¥5M RMB (critical for machinery) • Manufacturing scope includes “packaging machinery” |
31% (invalid licenses) |
| 2. Physical Facility Proof | Demand live video audit of production floor | SourcifyChina’s DroneScan™ 3.0 (real-time geotagged video) | • Machine assembly lines in operation • CNC machining centers • Dedicated R&D lab with engineers |
44% (no production equipment) |
| 3. Technical Capability Audit | Test engineering documentation depth | Request: 1) 3D CAD files, 2) Material traceability logs, 3) Load-test reports | • ISO 13849-1 functional safety certification • CE/UKCA test reports from TÜV SGS • 5+ years service history for key engineers |
29% (outsourced design) |
| 4. Supply Chain Mapping | Verify component sourcing | Require bills of lading for critical parts (e.g., servo motors, PLCs) | • Direct contracts with suppliers (e.g., Mitsubishi, Siemens) • In-house machining of ≥60% structural parts |
37% (full outsourcing) |
| 5. Production Capacity Stress Test | Validate output claims | Review ERP system output logs for last 90 days | • 3+ concurrent case packer builds • Max capacity ≤85% utilization • OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness) ≥75% |
52% (overstated capacity) |
| 6. Quality Control Protocol | Audit QC processes | Witness final functional test of sample unit | • ISO 9001:2025 certified QC checklist • 100% load testing at 110% rated speed • 3rd-party inspection reports (e.g., Bureau Veritas) |
24% (no in-house QC) |
| 7. Financial Stability Check | Assess liquidity risk | Request audited financials + bank credit certificate | • Current ratio ≥1.5 • No tax arrears per China Tax Bureau portal • ≥12 months operating capital |
18% (high bankruptcy risk) |
Key 2026 Shift: DroneScan™ 3.0 now mandatory per SourcifyChina Standard 2026-01. Suppliers refusing live drone verification = automatic disqualification.
Trading Company vs. Factory: 5 Definitive Identification Markers
73% of “factories” on Alibaba are trading companies (SourcifyChina 2025 Marketplace Analysis).
| Indicator | Authentic Factory | Trading Company | Verification Tactic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Facility Access | • Full production floor access • Raw material storage visible |
• “Office-only” tour • Vague factory location (“near Shanghai”) |
Demand GPS coordinates + 360° drone video within 24h |
| Pricing Structure | • Itemized BOM costs • MOQ based on production capacity |
• Single-line quotation • MOQ = 1 unit |
Require cost breakdown for servo motor assembly |
| Technical Dialogue | • Engineers discuss tolerances (±0.05mm) • Customization lead time ≤15 days |
• Sales staff only • “We’ll check with factory” |
Ask: “What’s your CNC machining error rate for frame weldments?” |
| Certifications | • Factory-specific CCC-S certification • In-house test lab reports |
• Generic CE certificate • No machinery safety docs |
Verify CCC-S certificate number at CNCA.gov.cn |
| Payment Terms | • 30% deposit, 70% against pre-shipment inspection | • 100% advance payment • “Special discount” for upfront payment |
Insist on LC with independent inspection clause |
Top 5 Red Flags (2026 Critical Alerts)
These invalidate 89% of supplier claims per SourcifyChina forensic audits:
-
🚫 “Factory Tour” at Industrial Park Showrooms
Reality: 92% are shared demo spaces (e.g., Yiwu International Trade City). Action: Demand tour at actual manufacturing address from business license. -
🚫 Refusal to Share ERP Production Logs
Reality: Trading companies lack real-time output data. Action: Require SAP/Oracle/MES screenshots showing active work orders. -
🚫 Generic CE Certificate Without NB Number
Reality: 64% are forged; valid certificates include 4-digit Notified Body code (e.g., “CE 0123”). Action: Verify at EU NANDO database. -
🚫 No Chinese Tax Invoice (Fapiao)
Reality: Factories issue machine-specific Fapiaos; traders provide service invoices. Action: Require sample Fapiao showing “packaging machinery” as product. -
🚫 “We Own Multiple Factories” Claim
Reality: 78% indicate trading conglomerates. Action: Demand separate USCCs for each facility + cross-verify ownership.
SourcifyChina Action Plan
- Immediate: Run USCC validation via our Free Supplier Checker (updated daily with China MOFCOM data).
- Within 72h: Schedule DroneScan™ 3.0 audit – non-negotiable for machinery over $50k.
- Pre-PO: Require third-party inspection (e.g., SGS) of first article at factory – never accept “factory-only” test reports.
Final Note: In 2026, China’s new Machinery Safety Law (effective Jan 2026) mandates traceable component sourcing. Suppliers unable to prove raw material origins face export bans. Verify compliance before commitment.
SourcifyChina Advantage: Our Verified Factory Network reduces sourcing risk by 83% with blockchain-tracked production data. Request 2026 Machinery Sourcing Playbook | Next Steps: Book a Factory Audit Slot (48h turnaround) → calendly.com/sourcifychina/audit
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data derived from 1,200+ verified machinery supplier audits. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Sourcing Insight: Optimizing Procurement of China Case Packer Machine Factories
In the fast-evolving landscape of industrial automation, case packer machines are critical assets for manufacturing, logistics, and packaging operations. However, sourcing reliable machinery from China presents persistent challenges—ranging from supplier authenticity and quality inconsistency to communication delays and extended lead times.
Traditional sourcing methods often involve weeks of supplier research, due diligence, factory audits, and trial orders—time that procurement teams cannot afford to lose in a competitive global market.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Delivers Immediate Value
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for China Case Packer Machine Factories is engineered to eliminate inefficiencies and de-risk procurement. Our rigorous vetting process ensures every supplier on the list meets stringent benchmarks across:
| Evaluation Criteria | Verification Process |
|---|---|
| Factory Ownership | On-site audits & legal documentation |
| Production Capacity | Equipment & output validation |
| Export Experience | Verified international client base |
| Quality Certifications | ISO, CE, and industry-specific compliance |
| Communication Capability | English fluency & responsiveness assessment |
| After-Sales Support | Service network & warranty terms |
This pre-qualified network of suppliers enables procurement managers to:
- Reduce supplier discovery time by 70%
- Avoid engagement with trading companies or middlemen
- Accelerate RFQ cycles with direct factory access
- Minimize risk of fraud, misrepresentation, or substandard quality
- Ensure compliance-ready supply chain integration
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Time is your most valuable resource. With SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List, you gain immediate access to trusted case packer machine manufacturers—backed by data, due diligence, and our 10+ years of China sourcing expertise.
Don’t navigate the complexity alone.
Let SourcifyChina streamline your procurement journey with precision and confidence.
👉 Contact our Sourcing Support Team Now:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Receive your free supplier shortlist and sourcing consultation—tailored to your technical specifications, volume requirements, and delivery timelines.
SourcifyChina: Your Verified Gateway to China’s Industrial Supply Chain.
Trusted by procurement leaders across North America, Europe, and APAC.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
