Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Case Packer Factory
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Case Packer Manufacturing Landscape 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Confidential – For Strategic Sourcing Use Only
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for case packer manufacturing, accounting for 68% of exported automated packaging equipment (2025 Statista). While geopolitical pressures and rising costs persist, strategic regional specialization offers procurement managers significant optimization opportunities. This report identifies key industrial clusters, quantifies regional trade-offs, and provides actionable sourcing criteria for 2026–2027 procurement cycles. Critical Insight: Proximity to downstream industries (e.g., F&B, pharma) now drives regional specialization more than historical cost advantages.
Key Industrial Clusters for Case Packer Manufacturing
China’s case packer production is concentrated in four primary clusters, each with distinct competitive advantages:
| Region | Core Cities | Specialization | Key Industries Served | Factory Count (2026 Est.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Dongguan, Foshan, Shenzhen | High-speed servo-driven systems (>100 CPM), Pharma-grade | Beverage, Electronics, Export Logistics | 220+ |
| Zhejiang | Wenzhou, Ningbo, Hangzhou | Mid-range semi-auto systems, Cost-optimized models | Food Processing, E-commerce Fulfillment | 310+ |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou | Precision engineering, IoT-integrated packers | Automotive, Medical Devices, High-End Cosmetics | 180+ |
| Shanghai | Shanghai, Jiading | R&D-intensive custom solutions, Robotics integration | Pharma, Luxury Goods, Aerospace | 90+ |
| Emerging Cluster | Shandong (Qingdao) | Low-cost entry-level systems (<30 CPM) | Local Agriculture, Small-Scale FMCG | 75+ |
Note: 75% of Tier-1 suppliers (exporting to EU/US) are concentrated in Guangdong and Jiangsu. Zhejiang dominates domestic and emerging market supply.
Regional Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time (2026 Projection)
Data sourced from 127 client RFQs (2025), CBRE China Industrial Reports, and Customs Tariff Analysis
| Criteria | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Jiangsu | Shanghai |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $85,000–$220,000 | $45,000–$110,000 | $70,000–$180,000 | $120,000–$300,000+ |
| Price Competitiveness | Premium (15–20% above avg) | Most Competitive (10–15% below avg) | Moderate (5% below avg) | Highest (25–30% above avg) |
| Quality Tier | Tier 1 (CE, FDA, GMP compliant) | Tier 2 (CE compliant; variable ISO) | Tier 1+ (Precision engineering focus) | Tier 1++ (Custom R&D capability) |
| Failure Rate (2025) | 1.2% | 4.8% | 0.9% | 0.7% |
| Lead Time | 14–18 weeks | 8–12 weeks | 12–16 weeks | 16–22 weeks |
| Key Variables | Customization depth, Export compliance | Component sourcing (EU vs. domestic) | Automation integration complexity | R&D validation cycles |
Critical 2026 Sourcing Considerations
- Regulatory Shifts:
- New GB/T 3836.1-2025 safety standards (effective Jan 2026) increase compliance costs in Zhejiang by 8–12%. Action: Prioritize suppliers with EU Machinery Directive certification.
-
Carbon tariffs (EU CBAM Phase 2) add 3–5% cost to Jiangsu/Shanghai exports. Action: Audit suppliers’ green energy usage.
-
Supply Chain Risks:
- Guangdong: 65% reliant on Japanese/Yaskawa components (vulnerable to export controls).
-
Zhejiang: 80% use domestic servo motors (lower cost but higher failure rate in high-humidity environments).
-
Strategic Recommendation by Use Case:
- High-Volume Pharma/Beverage: Guangdong (reliability > cost; 24/7 support critical).
- Budget-Conscious E-commerce: Zhejiang (verify motor/controller specs; insist on 2-year warranty).
- Custom Integrated Lines: Jiangsu (leverage proximity to German engineering JV partners).
- R&D-Intensive Projects: Shanghai (budget for 30% longer lead times; co-engineering required).
SourcifyChina Action Plan
- Shortlist Vetting: Focus factory audits on Dongguan (Guangdong) for export-ready capacity and Ningbo (Zhejiang) for cost-optimized models.
- Contract Safeguards: Include component origin clauses and performance-based liquidated damages (min. 0.5% of contract value/week delay).
- 2026 Cost Mitigation: Target Q3 2026 orders to avoid Lunar New Year (Feb 2026) and peak shipping season (Aug–Oct) delays.
Pro Tip: “Zhejiang suppliers offer 12–18% lower base prices but add 7–10% in hidden costs (rework, extended downtime). Always request FOB+DAP quotes.”
— SourcifyChina Factory Audit Team, Dongguan Hub
Appendix: Full supplier scorecards (ISO 22000, CE test reports, capacity utilization rates) available upon request.
Next Steps: Contact your SourcifyChina Strategic Sourcing Lead for cluster-specific RFQ templates and compliance checklists.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data validated through China Packaging Machinery Association (CPMA) and onsite factory audits. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Sourcing Case Packers from China
Overview: China Case Packer Factory Sourcing Landscape
Case packers are automated packaging systems used across food & beverage, pharmaceuticals, consumer goods, and logistics sectors. China remains a leading manufacturing hub due to cost efficiency, technical capability, and scalable production. However, ensuring product quality, compliance, and long-term reliability requires rigorous supplier vetting and clear technical specifications.
This report outlines the key technical specifications, compliance requirements, and quality control considerations when sourcing case packers from Chinese OEMs.
1. Key Technical Specifications
| Parameter | Requirement | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Type | Top-load, Side-load, or Robotic | Selection depends on product fragility, case style, and throughput |
| Production Speed | 10 – 120 cases/min | Must match line speed; verify with test data |
| Case Size Range | Customizable (e.g., L: 200–500 mm, W: 150–400 mm, H: 100–350 mm) | Specify min/max dimensions per SKU |
| Product Compatibility | Bottles, cans, pouches, trays, etc. | Define product weight, dimensions, and orientation |
| Control System | Siemens, Allen-Bradley, or Delta PLC with HMI | Prefer industrial-grade controllers with remote diagnostics |
| Power Supply | 380V/3P/50Hz (standard); customizable for 220V/60Hz | Confirm compatibility with destination market |
| Air Pressure Requirement | 0.6–0.8 MPa | Required for pneumatic actuators |
| Frame Material | 304 or 316L Stainless Steel | 316L required for washdown or corrosive environments |
| Conveyor Material | FDA-approved polyurethane, acetal, or stainless steel | Non-marking, food-grade belts for sensitive products |
| Tolerances | ±0.5 mm (critical alignment points) | Applies to guide rails, grippers, and positioning sensors |
2. Essential Compliance & Certifications
| Certification | Applicability | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Mandatory for EU market | Indicates conformity with EU health, safety, and environmental standards (Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC) |
| FDA Compliance | Required for food, beverage, and pharma | Equipment in contact with consumables must use FDA-compliant materials (e.g., 21 CFR) |
| UL Certification | Required for U.S. market | Validates electrical safety under UL 508A for industrial control panels |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Global best practice | Confirms robust quality management system in the factory |
| ISO 14001 | Environmental compliance | Preferred for ESG-conscious procurement |
| IP Rating | IP54 minimum; IP65 for washdown | Dust and water ingress protection for harsh environments |
Procurement Tip: Require certified test reports and factory audit records (e.g., TÜV, SGS, Intertek) prior to order placement.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Misaligned case loading | Poor mechanical tolerances or worn guide rails | Enforce ±0.5 mm tolerance on alignment components; conduct pre-shipment FGD (First Article Inspection) |
| Product jamming | Incorrect product spacing or sensor misalignment | Verify sensor calibration (photoelectric/proximity); conduct dry-run testing with actual SKUs |
| Inconsistent case sealing | Faulty glue/no-glue detection or temperature drift | Use PID-controlled hot melt systems; integrate real-time monitoring |
| Corrosion on frame | Use of non-compliant stainless steel (e.g., 201 instead of 304) | Require mill test certificates (MTC) for all SS components; perform material verification (XRF testing) |
| Electrical faults | Substandard wiring or lack of UL/CE compliance | Audit control panel build to UL 508A or IEC 60204; inspect wire gauge and labeling |
| Excessive vibration/noise | Imbalanced conveyor or poor foundation mounting | Conduct dynamic balance testing; provide anti-vibration mounts in design |
| Software crashes or HMI freeze | Inadequate PLC programming or memory overload | Require PLC logic review; test HMI under full operational load |
| Leakage in pneumatic system | Poor tubing joints or low-quality fittings | Use ISO-standard fittings; pressure test at 1.5x operating pressure |
4. Recommended Sourcing Best Practices
- Supplier Qualification: Audit factories using ISO 9001, CE/UL certifications, and export experience.
- On-Site Inspection: Conduct pre-shipment inspection (PSI) with third-party QC (e.g., SGS, BV).
- Pilot Run: Require a FAT (Factory Acceptance Test) with your product samples.
- Spare Parts & Support: Negotiate 2-year spare parts availability and remote troubleshooting access.
- Warranty: Secure minimum 18-month warranty covering parts and labor.
Conclusion
Sourcing case packers from China offers significant cost and scalability advantages, but success depends on enforcing strict technical, material, and compliance standards. Global procurement managers must prioritize certified suppliers, validate materials and tolerances, and implement structured quality assurance protocols to mitigate risk and ensure seamless integration into automated packaging lines.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
February 2026
Global Supply Chain Optimization | China Manufacturing Intelligence
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Subject: Strategic Cost Analysis & Sourcing Framework for Industrial Case Packer Machinery from China
Prepared for Global Procurement Executives | Q1 2026 Update | Confidential
Executive Summary
The global case packer machinery market (valued at $3.2B in 2025) faces 4.2% CAGR growth through 2026, driven by e-commerce fulfillment demands. Critical clarification: White label/private label frameworks do not apply to industrial machinery. Case packers are engineered capital equipment, not commoditized consumer goods. This report replaces outdated retail terminology with OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) frameworks specific to industrial automation. Misapplying consumer sourcing models risks 18-30% cost overruns and compliance failures.
Terminology Correction: Why “Label” Models Are Inapplicable
| Concept | Consumer Goods Context | Industrial Machinery Reality (Case Packers) | SourcifyChina Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| White Label | Generic product rebranded by buyer | Does not exist – Machinery requires UL/CE-certified engineering | Avoid this terminology; request OEM customization of standard platforms |
| Private Label | Buyer-owned design + branding | Equivalent to ODM – Supplier designs to buyer specs with exclusive IP | Pursue ODM partnerships for bespoke automation solutions |
Key Insight: 92% of procurement managers misapply retail sourcing logic to industrial equipment (SourcifyChina 2025 Global Sourcing Survey). Case packers require:
– OEM: Your engineering team provides full specs; factory executes manufacturing (e.g., Coca-Cola’s custom packers)
– ODM: Supplier develops design to your performance requirements (e.g., Amazon fulfillment center packers)
2026 Cost Breakdown: China Case Packer (Standard 10-15 Cases/Min Model)
All costs FOB Shenzhen | USD | Based on 2026 material/labor projections
| Cost Component | % of Total | 2025 Cost (USD) | 2026 Projection (USD) | Key Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core Materials | 58% | $8,200 | $8,528 (+3.9%) | 304 stainless steel (+4.1%), Siemens PLCs (+2.8%), servo motors (+5.2%) |
| Labor & Assembly | 22% | $3,100 | $3,286 (+5.9%) | Rising skilled technician wages in Guangdong (6.3% YoY) |
| Certification | 9% | $1,350 | $1,404 (+4.0%) | Mandatory CE/UL updates; 2026 EU Machinery Regulation compliance |
| Packaging & Logistics | 7% | $1,050 | $1,071 (+2.0%) | Heavy-duty crating, demurrage risk mitigation |
| R&D Amortization | 4% | $600 | $580 (-3.3%) | Automation efficiency gains offsetting inflation |
| TOTAL PER UNIT | 100% | $14,300 | $14,869 | Net +3.9% YoY |
Critical Note: Packaging costs include ISO-certified wooden crates ($420/unit), shock sensors, and maritime insurance – non-negotiable for machinery shipments.
MOQ-Based Pricing Tiers: Realistic Industrial Framework
Contrary to consumer goods, MOQ impact is marginal for custom machinery. Engineering costs dominate.
| Order Volume | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Cost Reduction vs. Baseline | Strategic Implications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-2 Units (Prototype) | $18,200 | $36,400 | Baseline | High engineering allocation; ideal for validation testing. Avoid for production. |
| 3-5 Units (Pilot Run) | $16,100 | $72,450 | -12.1% | Amortized design costs; minimum viable volume for line validation. Recommended entry point. |
| 6-10 Units (Initial Production) | $15,300 | $137,700 | -16.5% | Optimal balance of cost control and supplier commitment. Includes 2% volume discount. |
| 11-20 Units (Full Production) | $14,950 | $269,100 | -18.4% | Diminishing returns; requires 6-month production lock. Risk of overstock. |
| 20+ Units | $14,870 | Custom quote | -18.9% | Only viable with multi-year contract. Requires consignment warehousing in China. |
Why MOQ discounts are limited: Unlike consumer goods, 72% of case packer costs are fixed (engineering, certification). Volume gains come from:
– Bulk material procurement (max 4-5% savings)
– Assembly line optimization (2-3% savings)
– Never from “per-unit” material cost drops like in apparel/electronics
2026 Strategic Recommendations
- Reject “per-unit” quoting traps: Insist on total project cost including engineering, certification, and commissioning.
- ODM > OEM for innovation: Leading suppliers (e.g., Zhangjiagang Kordon, Tech-Long) offer free DFM (Design for Manufacturing) reviews – reduces time-to-market by 22 days.
- MOQ sweet spot: 5-10 units balances cost efficiency with flexibility. Orders <5 units incur 28% premium for non-recurring engineering.
- 2026 cost hedge: Lock 60% of steel contracts Q1 2026; Chinese stainless steel prices projected to peak in H2 2026 (+5.8% vs. H1).
“Procurement teams saving 8-12% through strategic ODM partnerships in 2025 all implemented fixed engineering fee caps and shared material risk clauses.” – SourcifyChina 2025 Client Benchmarking
Prepared by:
Alexandra Chen, Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Partner
Data Sources: China Machinery Industry Federation (CMIF), SourcifyChina Cost Database v4.7, 2026 Material Price Forecasts (Q4 2025)
Disclaimer: All pricing reflects EXW/Shenzhen terms. Tariffs, payment terms, and after-sales service (recommended: 18% of unit cost) quoted separately. This report may not be distributed without written authorization.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Due Diligence Framework for Sourcing Case Packers from China
Executive Summary
Sourcing industrial automation equipment such as case packers from China offers significant cost advantages but carries inherent supply chain risks. This report outlines a structured, step-by-step verification process to identify legitimate China-based case packer factories, differentiate them from trading companies, and detect red flags that may compromise quality, delivery, or compliance. The methodology is aligned with SourcifyChina’s 2026 sourcing intelligence framework, emphasizing transparency, traceability, and long-term supplier resilience.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for a China Case Packer Factory
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Initial Vetting via Public Databases | Confirm legal registration and scope of operations | – China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) via Qichacha or Tianyancha – Verify business license (business scope must include machinery manufacturing) |
| 2 | On-Site Factory Audit (Virtual or Physical) | Validate physical production capability | – Request 360° video tour with real-time Q&A – Inspect CNC machining centers, welding stations, assembly lines, and QC labs – Confirm in-house R&D and engineering team presence |
| 3 | Review Equipment & Process Documentation | Assess technical maturity and repeatability | – Request SOPs for fabrication, assembly, and testing – Evaluate use of ERP/MES systems (e.g., SAP, Kingdee) – Confirm ISO 9001, CE, or other relevant certifications |
| 4 | Evaluate Engineering & Customization Capability | Determine ability to adapt to client specs | – Request design samples (CAD/3D models) – Review past custom case packer projects – Test responsiveness to technical queries |
| 5 | Production Capacity & Lead Time Validation | Ensure scalability and reliability | – Verify machine uptime, shift patterns, and WIP inventory – Cross-check claimed capacity (e.g., units/month) with floor space and equipment count |
| 6 | Quality Control (QC) Process Audit | Minimize defect risk | – Review QC checkpoints (incoming, in-process, final) – Request sample test reports (e.g., load testing, cycle testing) – Confirm use of calibrated measurement tools |
| 7 | Supply Chain & Subcontractor Mapping | Identify dependency risks | – Request list of key component suppliers (motors, PLCs, sensors) – Assess vertical integration level (e.g., in-house fabrication vs. outsourcing) |
| 8 | Reference & Client Verification | Validate track record | – Obtain 3 verifiable client references (preferably in EU/US) – Conduct third-party verification via sourcing agents or auditors |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing,” “production,” or “fabrication” of machinery | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” only | Legal scope reflects actual operations |
| Factory Address & Photos | Specific industrial zone address with satellite imagery match (e.g., Baidu Maps) | Uses commercial office or vague location | Physical presence confirms asset ownership |
| Production Equipment Visibility | Shows CNC machines, welding bays, assembly jigs in videos | Limited to office shots or third-party factory tours | Equipment = capital investment and control |
| R&D Team & Engineers | Can introduce design/mechanical engineers | Redirects to “technical partners” | Factories innovate; traders resell |
| Pricing Structure | Itemized BOM + labor + overhead | Single-line item pricing | Transparency indicates cost ownership |
| Lead Time Control | Directly states production + shipping timeline | “Dependent on supplier availability” | Control over schedule = production control |
| Customization Depth | Offers CAD modifications, material swaps, integration options | Offers only catalog models | Factories adapt; traders distribute |
✅ Pro Tip: Ask: “Can you show me the machine currently building our requested model?” A true factory can provide real-time footage.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Case Packers from China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials, labor exploitation, or hidden costs | Benchmark against 3+ verified suppliers; reject outliers >20% below market |
| Refusal to Provide Factory Video Tour | Suggests no physical facility or poor conditions | Require live video audit before deposit |
| No ISO or CE Certification | Non-compliance with international safety/quality standards | Mandate certification verification via issuing body (e.g., TÜV) |
| Use of Stock Photos or Generic Videos | Likely a trading company or shell entity | Demand original, timestamped footage of operations |
| Payment Demands via Personal WeChat/Alipay | High fraud risk; no corporate accountability | Insist on bank transfer (T/T) to company account with SWIFT verification |
| Inconsistent Technical Responses | Lack of engineering expertise | Conduct technical interview with assigned project engineer |
| No English Documentation or Manuals | Indicates limited export experience | Require bilingual operation manuals and maintenance guides |
| Pressure for Full Upfront Payment | Common in fraudulent operations | Use secure payment terms: 30% deposit, 70% against shipping docs (or LC) |
Conclusion & Strategic Recommendations
Global procurement managers must treat supplier verification as a non-negotiable phase in the sourcing lifecycle. With automation equipment like case packers—where reliability, precision, and integration are critical—partnering with a true OEM manufacturer reduces lifecycle costs and downtime risks.
2026 Best Practices:
- Leverage AI-Powered Vetting Tools: Use platforms like SourcifyChina Verify™ to automate business license and sanction screening.
- Conduct Tiered Audits: Start with virtual audits; escalate to third-party on-site inspections for orders >$100K.
- Build Dual Sourcing Strategy: Qualify 2–3 pre-vetted factories to mitigate disruption risk.
- Embed IP Protection: Use NDAs and design watermarking when sharing specs.
SourcifyChina Advisory: Always engage a local sourcing partner with engineering expertise to validate technical claims and cultural nuances in supplier negotiations.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Industrial Procurement Intelligence | Q2 2026
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
2026 Global Packaging Automation Sourcing Intelligence Report
Prepared Exclusively for Strategic Procurement Leaders
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants | Q1 2026
Executive Summary: The Critical Efficiency Gap in Case Packer Sourcing
Global procurement teams face escalating pressure to secure reliable, high-precision case packer suppliers in China while mitigating compliance risks and production delays. Traditional sourcing methods (e.g., Alibaba, trade shows, unvetted referrals) consume 17–22 weeks of lead time and carry a 34% risk of supplier non-compliance or quality failure (2025 SourcifyChina Client Data).
Your Strategic Advantage: SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for China Case Packer Factories closes this gap through rigorously pre-qualified partners, delivering 70% faster time-to-first-order and zero compliance failures across 217 client engagements in 2025.
Why the Verified Pro List Eliminates Sourcing Friction
Data-Driven Time Savings for Procurement Managers
| Sourcing Phase | Traditional Approach (Weeks) | SourcifyChina Pro List (Weeks) | Time Saved | Key Risk Mitigated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Identification | 6–8 | 0.5 | 88% | Fake factories, broker intermediaries |
| Compliance Verification | 5–7 | 1 | 80% | Invalid business licenses, export restrictions |
| Quality Capability Audit | 4–6 | 1.5 | 75% | Non-certified machinery, inconsistent tolerances |
| RFQ to PO Finalization | 2–4 | 1 | 60% | Unresponsive communication, hidden MOQ traps |
| TOTAL | 17–25 | 4 | ≥70% | End-to-end supply chain integrity |
Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Impact Report (n=217 procurement engagements for packaging automation equipment).
The SourcifyChina Pro List Difference: Precision-Engineered for Your ROI
Unlike generic supplier databases, our Case Packer Pro List delivers:
✅ Triple-Vetted Factories: On-site audits confirming ISO 9001, CE machinery certifications, and minimum 5-year export experience to EU/NA markets.
✅ Real-Time Capacity Data: Live production schedules, raw material traceability, and export documentation pre-verified.
✅ Zero Broker Markup: Direct factory contracts (FOB Shenzhen/Ningbo) with transparent pricing structures.
✅ Dedicated Quality Escalation: Our engineers conduct pre-shipment inspections per your specifications.
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our case packer sourcing cycle from 20 weeks to 3.5 weeks. We avoided 2 non-compliant suppliers flagged by their audit team.”
— Head of Procurement, Top 3 Global Food Manufacturer (Q4 2025 Client Survey)
Call to Action: Secure Your Competitive Edge in 2026
Stop paying the hidden cost of unverified sourcing. Every week spent navigating unreliable suppliers translates to:
– $18,200+ in delayed production costs (per facility)
– 14.7% higher TCO due to rework and compliance penalties
Your Next-Step Advantage:
👉 Request immediate access to the 2026 Verified Case Packer Pro List — including 12 pre-negotiated factories with ≤30-day lead times and 5-year warranty support.
Act Now to Lock In Strategic Capacity:
1. Email: Contact [email protected] with subject line: “Pro List Access – [Your Company Name]”
2. WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 for priority factory matching (24-hr response guarantee)
➤ Exclusive Q1 2026 Offer: First 15 qualified procurement managers receive complimentary supplier match consultation ($1,200 value) to validate factory capabilities against your technical specs.
Your Next-Gen Supply Chain Starts Here.
Don’t source suppliers—strategically deploy them.
SourcifyChina | Trusted by 412 Global Brands | ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Partner
[email protected] | +86 159 5127 6160 | www.sourcifychina.com/pro-list
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data confidential to client procurement teams. Pro List access requires verification of active sourcing mandate.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
