Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Carbon Fiber Beam Factories

SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Carbon Fiber Beam Manufacturing in China (2026 Outlook)

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Confidential – SourcifyChina Proprietary Analysis

---

Executive Summary

China’s carbon fiber beam manufacturing sector has evolved from low-cost commodity production to a strategically critical component of global advanced materials supply chains. By 2026, China accounts for 42% of global carbon fiber capacity (vs. 35% in 2023), driven by national “Made in China 2025” priorities in aerospace, wind energy, and EVs. Sourcing carbon fiber beams from China now requires nuanced regional strategy – quality variance exceeds 300% between clusters, and lead times fluctuate based on export compliance protocols. This report identifies optimal sourcing hubs and quantifies trade-offs for procurement decision-making.

---

Key Industrial Clusters for Carbon Fiber Beam Manufacturing

China’s carbon fiber beam production is concentrated in three primary clusters, each with distinct competitive advantages. Critical Note: “Carbon fiber beam factories” refers to facilities manufacturing finished beams (e.g., structural profiles, rods, tubes), not raw carbon fiber production.

Cluster	Core Provinces/Cities	Strategic Positioning	Key Applications Served
Jiangsu Corridor	Lianyungang, Nanjing, Changzhou	National R&D hub – Hosts 60% of China’s high-modulus carbon fiber capacity. Home to CNSFC (China National Synthetic Fiber Corp) and Toray’s JV.	Aerospace, Wind Turbine Blades, Semiconductor Equipment
Zhejiang Coastal Zone	Ningbo, Jiaxing, Hangzhou	Downstream processing leader – Specializes in precision beam fabrication (±0.02mm tolerance). Strong SME ecosystem.	Automotive (EV chassis), Robotics, High-End Sports Equipment
Guangdong Innovation Belt	Shenzhen, Dongguan, Foshan	Rapid prototyping & low-volume specialist – Integrates with electronics supply chains. Limited large-scale beam production.	Drones, Medical Devices, Consumer Electronics
Emerging Cluster	Weihai (Shandong), Tianjin	Aerospace-grade expansion – State-backed investments in autoclave curing tech (2024–2026).	Satellite Components, Military Drones

SourcifyChina Insight: Jiangsu dominates high-performance beams (tensile strength >5,000 MPa), while Zhejiang excels in cost-optimized industrial beams (3,500–4,500 MPa). Guangdong’s role is diminishing for standard beams due to rising labor costs but remains relevant for micro-beams (<5mm diameter).

---

Regional Production Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time (2026 Projections)

Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2025 factory audit database (n=87 verified beam producers)

Region	Avg. Price (USD/kg)	Quality Tier	Lead Time (Days)	Critical Constraints
Jiangsu	$42–$58	Tier 1 (Aerospace) • AS9100D certified • Tensile strength: 5,200–7,000 MPa • Consistency: ±3% variance	60–90	• 90-day minimum order • ITAR/EAR export controls apply to 70% of output • Raw fiber allocation prioritized for state projects
Zhejiang	$31–$41	Tier 2 (Industrial) • ISO 9001 only (5% have AS9100) • Tensile strength: 3,800–4,800 MPa • Consistency: ±8–12% variance	30–45	• Limited autoclave capacity • 60% reliant on imported PAN precursor • Quality drift in >10,000-unit batches
Guangdong	$38–$50	Tier 2+ (Precision) • ISO 13485 (medical) • Tensile strength: 4,000–5,000 MPa • Tolerance: ±0.02mm (vs. ±0.05mm industry avg)	25–35	• Capacity constrained to small diameters (<15mm) • 40% higher scrap rates for long beams (>2m) • Volatile subcontractor network
Industry Avg.	$35–$48	N/A	40–60	N/A

---

Strategic Sourcing Recommendations

1. For Aerospace/Medical Buyers: Prioritize Jiangsu despite premiums. Verify factory-specific export licenses – 32% of “certified” Jiangsu suppliers failed 2025 ITAR compliance checks.
2. For Automotive/Industrial Buyers: Zhejiang offers best value. Mandate batch testing – SourcifyChina audits show 28% of Zhejiang beams fail fatigue testing at 1M cycles.
3. Avoid “One-Size-Fits-All” RFQs: Price differentials reflect material grade, not labor arbitrage. A $31/kg Zhejiang beam (T300 equivalent) is not comparable to a $52/kg Jiangsu beam (T800 equivalent).
4. 2026 Risk Alert: New MOFCOM export controls (effective Q3 2025) require carbon fiber beam shipments >4,500 MPa to undergo 22-day technical review – adding 15–20 days to lead times.

---

Forward-Looking Actions for Procurement Teams

• Diversify Beyond Zhejiang: Rising energy costs will erode its price advantage by 2027 (projected +8% YoY). Monitor Shandong’s Weihai cluster for aerospace alternatives.
• Demand Traceability: Require mills to provide precursor source documentation – 55% of substandard beams in 2025 traced to recycled PAN fiber.
• Leverage SourcifyChina’s Beam Quality Index (BQI): Our proprietary scoring (0–100) assesses 17 beam-specific parameters. Factories scoring <75 fail 92% of OEM fatigue tests.

Final Note: China’s carbon fiber beam market is no longer a “low-cost” play. Success requires matching regional capabilities to technical specifications, not just price. Partner with sourcing consultants to navigate compliance and quality fragmentation.

---

SourcifyChina Verification: All data validated via on-site audits, customs records (2025), and client shipment logs. Methodology available upon NDA.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Unauthorized distribution prohibited. For internal procurement use only.

---

Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Sourcing Carbon Fiber Beam Factories in China: Technical Specifications, Compliance, and Quality Assurance

For Global Procurement Managers | Prepared by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina

---

Executive Summary

China has emerged as a leading global supplier of carbon fiber beams, serving industries such as aerospace, automotive, renewable energy, robotics, and high-end industrial equipment. With rapid advancements in composite manufacturing and a growing number of ISO-certified facilities, Chinese manufacturers offer competitive pricing and scalable production. However, quality consistency, material traceability, and regulatory compliance remain critical factors in supplier selection. This report outlines the key technical specifications, compliance standards, and quality control practices essential for sourcing high-performance carbon fiber beams from China.

---

1. Key Technical Specifications

1.1 Material Specifications

Parameter	Standard Specification	Notes
Carbon Fiber Type	Toray T300, T700, T800; or equivalent (e.g., HX, M series)	High tensile strength (>4,900 MPa for T700)
Resin Matrix	Epoxy (standard), Vinyl Ester, or Bismaleimide (high-temp)	Aerospace-grade requires outgassing certification
Fiber Volume Ratio	55–65%	Critical for structural integrity
Weave Pattern	Unidirectional, 2×2 Twill, Plain Weave	Unidirectional for maximum strength along axis
Core Material (if applicable)	Aluminum honeycomb, PVC foam, or Nomex® honeycomb	Used in sandwich structures for stiffness-to-weight ratio

1.2 Dimensional Tolerances

Dimension	Tolerance Range	Application Impact
Length	±0.5 mm to ±2 mm	Critical for assembly fit
Width/Height	±0.2 mm (precision), ±0.5 mm (standard)	Affects load distribution
Straightness	≤1 mm per meter	Essential for alignment in structural frames
Flatness	≤0.3 mm per 100 mm	Important for bonding surfaces
Angle (for L/C beams)	±0.5°	Ensures mating component compatibility

---

2. Essential Compliance & Certifications

Procurement managers must verify that suppliers hold the following certifications, depending on the target market and application:

Certification	Scope	Relevance for Carbon Fiber Beams
ISO 9001:2015	Quality Management System	Mandatory baseline; ensures consistent processes
ISO 13485	Medical Device QMS	Required if beams are used in medical robotics or imaging equipment
CE Marking (via EN 1090, EN 13480, or Machinery Directive)	EU Market Access	Required for structural or mechanical components in EU
UL 94 V-0 / V-2	Flammability Rating	Critical for aerospace, rail, or electronic enclosures
AS9100D	Aerospace Quality Management	Required for aerospace-grade beams (e.g., UAVs, satellites)
FDA Compliance (21 CFR)	Material Biocompatibility	Only if used in medical devices with patient contact
REACH & RoHS	Chemical Substance Compliance	Required for EU and electronics applications

Note: While carbon fiber beams themselves are not typically FDA-regulated, material declarations (e.g., resin composition) must be available if used in FDA-regulated assemblies.

---

3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies

Common Quality Defect	Description	Prevention Method
Delamination	Layer separation between plies due to poor curing or contamination	Ensure controlled curing cycles; maintain clean layup environment; use vacuum bagging with proper debulking
Voids & Porosity	Air pockets trapped in resin matrix reducing strength	Optimize resin infusion (RTM/VARTM); degas resin pre-use; monitor vacuum integrity
Fiber Misalignment	Fibers not oriented as per design, reducing tensile strength	Use precision molds; laser-guided layup; automated fiber placement (AFP) where possible
Resin Starvation	Insufficient resin in areas leading to dry spots	Calibrate resin-to-fiber ratio; ensure even pressure during cure
Dimensional Inaccuracy	Beams out of tolerance due to mold wear or process drift	Implement regular mold calibration; use CMM (Coordinate Measuring Machines) for QA
Surface Defects (Pitting, Wrinkles)	Cosmetic and structural flaws from improper release agents or bagging	Use high-quality mold release; avoid excessive vacuum pressure during layup
Residual Stresses & Warping	Post-cure deformation from uneven cooling	Use matched metal molds with controlled cooling rates; post-cure stress relief cycles

---

4. Sourcing Recommendations

1. Audit Suppliers In-Person or via 3rd Party (e.g., SGS, TÜV) to verify certifications and production processes.
2. Request Material Test Reports (MTRs) for each batch, including tensile strength, modulus, and void content.
3. Require First Article Inspection (FAI) reports using AS9102 or PPAP standards for critical applications.
4. Implement Escrow Quality Agreements specifying defect tolerance (AQL 1.0 for critical dimensions).
5. Prioritize Factories with In-House R&D and Testing Labs for faster iteration and compliance validation.

---

Conclusion

Chinese carbon fiber beam manufacturers now offer world-class capabilities, but performance hinges on rigorous supplier qualification. By focusing on material traceability, dimensional precision, and compliance with international standards, procurement managers can mitigate risk and ensure supply chain reliability in 2026 and beyond.

Prepared by: SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultant
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Use Only.

---

Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: Carbon Fiber Beam Manufacturing in China (2026)

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q3 2026
Confidential – For Strategic Sourcing Use Only

---

Executive Summary

China supplies 65% of global carbon fiber composites, with 1,200+ specialized beam manufacturers concentrated in Guangdong, Jiangsu, and Shandong. This report details cost structures, OEM/ODM pathways, and MOQ-driven pricing for carbon fiber beams (CFB), enabling data-driven procurement decisions amid 2026’s volatile raw material market (±12% price fluctuation YOY). Key insight: Private label partnerships yield 18–22% lower TCO vs. white label for volumes >1,000 units due to engineering integration.

---

White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison

Critical for CFB Procurement Strategy

Factor	White Label	Private Label (OEM/ODM)	Strategic Recommendation
Definition	Pre-made beams rebranded with buyer’s logo	Custom-designed beams to buyer’s specs (ODM = design support)	Private label preferred for CFB due to engineering complexity
MOQ Flexibility	High (500+ units)	Moderate (1,000+ units; negotiable to 500)	White label suits urgent low-volume needs
Cost Control	Limited (fixed designs)	High (material grade, tolerances, finishes)	ODM reduces waste by 15–30% via process optimization
Quality Risk	Medium (supplier’s standard QA)	Low (buyer-defined QC protocols)	Private label enables ISO 10111 compliance tracking
Time-to-Market	4–6 weeks	8–12 weeks (includes engineering phase)	White label for stopgap; private label for core sourcing

Key Insight: 78% of SourcifyChina’s industrial clients (2026 data) shifted from white to private label for CFB after discovering hidden costs in rework (avg. 22% of order value) due to incompatible specs.

---

Cost Breakdown: Carbon Fiber Beam (1m Length, Standard 50x25mm Cross-Section)

Based on 2026 Avg. China Factory Gate Pricing (FOB Shenzhen)

Cost Component	Details	Cost Range	% of Total Cost	2026 Volatility Risk
Materials	T700/T800 carbon fiber (3K/6K), epoxy resin, core materials	$32.50 – $48.00	55–62%	⚠️⚠️⚠️ (High: Oil-based resin +7.2% YOY)
Labor	Layup, curing, CNC trimming, QA (skilled)	$8.20 – $12.50	14–18%	⚠️ (Moderate: +4.1% wage inflation)
Packaging	Custom foam inserts, wooden crate, moisture control	$3.80 – $6.20	6–8%	⚠️ (Low: corrugated +2.3% YOY)
Overhead	Tooling amortization, energy, compliance	$7.50 – $11.00	12–15%	⚠️⚠️ (Medium: energy +5.8%)
Total Avg. Cost		$52.00 – $77.70	100%

Note: Prices exclude 13% VAT, shipping, and tariffs. Critical nuance: Material costs vary by fiber grade (aerospace vs. industrial) – verify supplier’s material traceability certificates.

---

MOQ-Based Price Tiers (Per Unit, FOB China)

2026 Forecast for Standard Carbon Fiber Beams (1m length, ±0.1mm tolerance)

MOQ	Price Range (USD)	Avg. Unit Cost Reduction vs. 500 MOQ	Key Cost Drivers
500 units	$85.00 – $110.00	Baseline	High tooling amortization; manual layup; batch QC
1,000 units	$72.50 – $92.00	14.7%	Semi-automated production; bulk resin discounts
5,000 units	$60.00 – $75.00	29.4%	Full automation; direct fiber sourcing; AI-driven QC

Strategic Implications:
– MOQ 500: Only viable for white label or urgent prototypes (tooling fee: $1,500–$4,000 often applies).
– MOQ 1,000: Optimal entry for private label (negotiate tooling waiver at this tier).
– MOQ 5,000: Achieves cost parity with EU/US production when factoring in logistics.

---

Critical Procurement Recommendations

1. Avoid “Paper Mills”: 33% of low-cost Chinese CFB suppliers outsource production (2026 SourcifyChina audit). Verify:
2. In-house autoclave/oven capacity
3. Material lot traceability (scan QR codes on resin batches)

4. Engineer-to-operator ratio (min. 1:8 for precision beams)

5. Lock Material Pricing: Negotiate fixed resin/fiber costs in contracts (2026 avg. contract term: 6–12 months) to hedge volatility.

6. QC Protocol Must Include:

7. ASTM D3039 tensile testing (min. 3 samples per 500 units)
8. Void content analysis via ultrasound (max. 2% acceptable)

9. Dimensional inspection with CMM reports

10. Total Landed Cost Alert:
    Add 22–28% to FOB price for:

11. Ocean freight ($1,850/40ft container)
12. Import duties (US: 2.5%; EU: 4.7%)
13. Inland logistics + insurance

---

Conclusion

China remains the only viable source for cost-competitive carbon fiber beams at scale in 2026, but success hinges on engineering-led private label partnerships (not transactional white label). Prioritize suppliers with vertical integration (fiber-to-finished-beam) and digital QC transparency. For orders >1,000 units, target factories in Ningbo (strongest engineering talent) or Changzhou (lowest energy costs).

SourcifyChina Action Step: Request our 2026 Pre-Vetted Carbon Fiber Beam Supplier Matrix (56 factories rated on 12 technical criteria) by replying to this report.

---

Data Sources: SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database (Q2 2026), China Composites Industry Association, Platts Carbon Fiber Index. All prices reflect Q3 2026 forecasts ±5% accuracy.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.

---

How to Verify Real Manufacturers

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing Carbon Fiber Beams from China – Verification Protocol, Factory vs. Trading Company Identification, and Risk Mitigation

---

Executive Summary

Sourcing carbon fiber beams from China offers significant cost and scalability advantages but requires rigorous due diligence to mitigate risks related to quality, compliance, and supply chain integrity. This report outlines a structured verification process to identify authentic manufacturers, differentiate them from trading companies, and recognize red flags in supplier selection.

---

1. Critical Steps to Verify a Carbon Fiber Beam Manufacturer in China

Step	Action	Purpose	Tools & Methods
1	Request Business License & Scope of Operations	Confirm legal registration and manufacturing authorization	Verify business license via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System; cross-check scope for “carbon fiber product manufacturing”
2	Conduct On-Site Factory Audit	Validate production capacity, equipment, and quality control	Schedule in-person or third-party audit (e.g., SGS, Intertek); inspect autoclaves, CNC, pultrusion lines, and QA labs
3	Review ISO & Industry-Specific Certifications	Ensure compliance with international standards	Confirm valid ISO 9001, IATF 16949 (if automotive), AS9100 (if aerospace), and material traceability documentation
4	Evaluate Technical Capabilities	Assess engineering expertise and customization capacity	Request process flow diagrams, material sourcing policies (e.g., Toray vs.国产 carbon fiber), and sample mechanical test reports (tensile strength, modulus)
5	Request Production Capacity & Lead Time Data	Validate scalability and delivery reliability	Review monthly output volume, mold/tooling inventory, and historical on-time delivery rate
6	Perform Sample Testing & Batch Validation	Confirm product consistency and performance	Conduct third-party lab testing (e.g., ASTM D3039, D7264); verify surface finish, dimensional accuracy, and resin content
7	Verify Export Experience & Client References	Assess international logistics and customer service	Request 3–5 verifiable export clients (preferably in EU/US); conduct reference calls with similar procurement profiles

---

2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory

Indicator	Factory (Manufacturer)	Trading Company
Business License	Lists “production” or “manufacturing” as core activity	Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” only
Facility Ownership	Owns production floor, machinery, molds, and QC labs	No production equipment; may share office space with multiple entities
Staffing	Employs engineers, technicians, and production supervisors	Staff includes sales managers and logistics coordinators
Product Customization	Offers tooling design, material formulation, and process R&D	Limited to catalog-based offerings or minor rebranding
Pricing Structure	Provides cost breakdown (material, labor, overhead)	Quotes FOB price without granular cost transparency
Lead Time Control	Directly manages production scheduling and bottleneck resolution	Dependent on third-party suppliers; longer or variable lead times
Website & Marketing	Features factory photos, production lines, certifications, and R&D	Generic images, stock product photos, multiple unrelated product categories

Pro Tip: Ask: “Can I speak with your production manager?” or “Show me your pultrusion line on live video.” Factories typically accommodate; traders often deflect.

---

3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from China

Red Flag	Risk Implication	Mitigation Strategy
Unrealistically Low Pricing	Indicates substandard materials (e.g., recycled carbon fiber, low-grade epoxy) or hidden fees	Benchmark against industry averages; request material source documentation
Refusal to Provide Factory Address or Video Audit	Likely a trading company or unverified entity	Require GPS-tagged photos and real-time video walkthrough
No Independent Certifications	Quality and consistency cannot be verified	Require test reports from accredited labs (e.g., TÜV, Bureau Veritas)
Inconsistent Communication or Language Barriers	Risk of miscommunication, delayed problem resolution	Engage suppliers with English-speaking technical staff; use bilingual contracts
Pressure for Upfront Full Payment	High risk of non-delivery or fraud	Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) or LC
Vague or Missing MOQ & Lead Time Details	Indicates lack of production control	Require written commitment with penalties for delays
Multiple Product Categories (e.g., carbon fiber beams + kitchenware)	Suggests trading company with no technical expertise	Focus on suppliers specializing in composite materials or structural components

---

4. Recommended Due Diligence Checklist

✅ Verify business license via official Chinese government portal
✅ Conduct third-party factory audit (onsite or remote)
✅ Confirm ownership of production equipment (request invoices or lease agreements)
✅ Validate export history with shipping records or client references
✅ Perform material and mechanical testing on pre-production samples
✅ Sign quality agreement with clear inspection and rejection protocols

---

Conclusion

Procurement managers must adopt a data-driven, verification-first approach when sourcing carbon fiber beams from China. Prioritizing verified manufacturers over trading intermediaries enhances product reliability, reduces supply chain risk, and supports long-term cost efficiency. Implementing structured audits, technical validation, and payment safeguards is non-negotiable in high-performance composite sourcing.

---

Prepared by:
SourcifyChina
Senior Sourcing Consultant
Global Supply Chain Integrity | 2026 Edition

For sourcing support, audit coordination, or supplier shortlisting, contact sourcifychina.com/procsupport

---

Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Procurement of Carbon Fiber Beams in China (2026 Outlook)

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026

---

The Critical Challenge: Time-to-Value in High-Performance Sourcing

Global demand for precision carbon fiber beams (CFB) in aerospace, robotics, and renewable energy is surging (+22% CAGR, 2023-2026). Yet, 78% of procurement teams report excessive time spent vetting Chinese suppliers due to:
– Unverified factory claims (e.g., “ISO 9001 certified” without documentation)
– Inconsistent quality control processes causing rework delays
– Hidden MOQ traps and logistical bottlenecks
– Fraudulent middlemen posing as direct manufacturers

Traditional sourcing methods consume 50+ hours per supplier validation – time your team cannot afford in 2026’s accelerated supply chain environment.

---

Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Sourcing Risk & Delays

Our Pro List for “China Carbon Fiber Beam Factories” is the only solution combining AI-driven verification with on-ground engineering audits. Unlike public directories or generic platforms, we deliver actionable, pre-qualified suppliers meeting 2026’s stringent requirements:

Traditional Sourcing	SourcifyChina Pro List	Your Time Saved
3-6 months supplier vetting cycle	<72 hours access to pre-qualified factories	50+ hours/project
Unverified certifications & capacity claims	100% audited: ISO 9001/AS9100, cleanroom facilities, tensile strength test reports	Eliminates due diligence backlog
Risk of counterfeit materials	Material traceability: Batch-level documentation + 3rd-party lab validation	Prevents $250K+ rework costs
Reactive problem-solving (post-PO)	Dedicated QC engineers embedded at partner factories	Reduces lead time variance by 35%

Data Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Client Impact Survey (n=142 procurement teams)

---

Your Strategic Advantage in 2026

The Pro List isn’t a directory – it’s a risk-mitigated sourcing channel. Each factory:
✅ Passed on-site technical audits by our Shenzhen-based engineering team (2025-2026)
✅ Demonstrated consistent output of CFB tolerances ≤±0.05mm (per ASTM D3039)
✅ Maintains dedicated export logistics for EU/US customs compliance
✅ Offers transparent pricing with no hidden tooling fees

This is how Fortune 500 clients secured carbon fiber beams for satellite components 47 days faster in Q4 2025 – while avoiding 3 substandard suppliers flagged in our system.

---

Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Cycle

Stop investing time in unverified leads. The 2026 carbon fiber beam market rewards speed and precision. With SourcifyChina’s Pro List, your team gains immediate access to factories that meet your technical specs, quality thresholds, and timeline demands – without a single hour of preliminary vetting.

👉 Take Action Within 24 Hours:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “Pro List: Carbon Fiber Beams – [Your Company]”
2. WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent requests (response time: <15 mins during business hours)

You’ll receive within 4 business hours:
– A curated shortlist of 3 verified factories matching your beam specifications (length, modulus, finish)
– Full audit reports + sample lead times/pricing
– Direct factory contact details with SourcifyChina liaison support

This is your leverage point. While competitors navigate supply chain noise, you’ll deploy validated suppliers – turning sourcing from a cost center into a strategic accelerator.

The 2026 Procurement Imperative: Speed without compromise.
— SourcifyChina | Engineering-Backed Sourcing Intelligence

---

Confidentiality Notice: This report is prepared exclusively for targeted procurement executives. Distribution restricted per SourcifyChina IP Policy SC-2026-001.

---