Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Candy Factory

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Candy Manufacturing Sector

Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Report Date: Q1 2026
Subject: Industrial Cluster Analysis for Sourcing Confectionery Products from China

---

Executive Summary

China remains the world’s largest confectionery exporter, accounting for ~28% of global candy trade (UN Comtrade 2025). While the term “China candy factory” is operationally inaccurate (procurement targets products, not facilities), this report identifies key manufacturing clusters for hard candy, gum, chocolate, and novelty confectionery. Strategic sourcing requires understanding regional specializations, cost structures, and evolving compliance landscapes. Critical Note: Post-2024, China’s confectionery sector faces tightened food safety regulations (GB 14881-2023) and rising labor costs, shifting competitiveness dynamics.

---

Key Industrial Clusters: China’s Candy Manufacturing Hubs

China’s confectionery production is concentrated in coastal provinces with mature supply chains, port access, and export-oriented infrastructure. Emerging clusters in Central China (e.g., Hubei) are gaining traction for cost-sensitive bulk orders but lag in quality consistency.

Top 4 Production Regions (2026 Focus):

1. Guangdong Province (Zhuhai, Shantou, Guangzhou)
2. Specialization: Mass-market hard candy, gum, lollipops; OEM for global discount retailers (e.g., Eurocentres, Dollar General).
3. Why dominant: Highest concentration of BRCGS AA+/IFS Food 6 certified factories (42% of national total), integrated packaging suppliers, and Shenzhen/HK export logistics.

4. 2026 Shift: Moving toward automated premium lines (e.g., sugar-free, functional candy) to offset 8.2% YoY labor cost increases.

5. Fujian Province (Quanzhou, Xiamen)

6. Specialization: Traditional Chinese candy (e.g., maltose, sesame crunch), coconut-based sweets, and private-label gummies.
7. Why dominant: Heritage in artisanal techniques; 68% of factories focus on halal/Kosher-certified production for MENA/SE Asia.

8. 2026 Shift: Adopting solar-powered drying tech to meet EU carbon tariffs (CBAM Phase II).

9. Zhejiang Province (Ningbo, Hangzhou)

10. Specialization: Mid-tier chocolate, filled candies, and novelty shapes (e.g., animal-shaped gummies). Strong in small-MOQ (500kg+) for DTC brands.
11. Why dominant: Proximity to Shanghai port; highest density of EU Organic/FSSC 22000 certified facilities (31% of national total).

12. 2026 Shift: Investing in blockchain traceability to comply with EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR).

13. Shanghai/Jiangsu (Suzhou, Kunshan)

14. Specialization: Premium chocolate, functional candy (vitamin-enriched), and R&D-focused co-manufacturing.
15. Why dominant: Access to multinationals’ R&D centers (e.g., Mars, Ferrero); 90% of factories have SQF Edition 9 certification.
16. 2026 Shift: Leading automation adoption (robotic filling/packaging) to counter labor shortages.

---

Regional Comparison: Sourcing Metrics (2026 Baseline)

Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2025 Supplier Performance Index (SPI) across 117 verified factories. Metrics reflect FOB terms for standard hard candy (1,000kg order).

Criteria	Guangdong	Fujian	Zhejiang	Shanghai/Jiangsu
Price (USD/kg)	$1.85 – $2.20	$1.65 – $2.00	$2.10 – $2.50	$2.75 – $3.40
Key Drivers	Scale efficiency; high labor costs	Lower wages; bulk raw material access	Mid-tier automation; packaging integration	Premium materials; R&D overhead
Quality Tier	BRCGS AA+ (Top 30%)	Halal/Kosher focus; variable consistency	Consistent FSSC 22000; strong visual appeal	SQF 9; batch traceability; lab testing
Common Issues	Over-reliance on subcontractors	Allergen cross-contamination risks	Color/shape deviations in humid months	Minimum order pressures
Lead Time (Days)	25-35	30-45	20-30	35-50
Breakdown	18d production + 7d QC/logistics	25d production + 10d customs (Xiamen port delays)	15d production + 5d express shipping	28d production + 12d compliance documentation
Best For	High-volume budget candy; urgent replenishment	Halal/MENA market entry; traditional formulas	DTC brands; seasonal novelties	Premium/EU compliance; co-development

---

Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers

1. Avoid “Lowest Cost” Traps: Fujian’s price advantage diminishes for EU/US buyers due to rejections from inconsistent allergen controls (2025 non-compliance rate: 18% vs. Guangdong’s 7%).
2. Prioritize Cluster-Specific Certifications:
3. EU Buyers: Target Zhejiang for EUDR-compliant cocoa or Shanghai for SQF-certified functional candy.
4. MENA Buyers: Fujian remains optimal but mandate 3rd-party halal audits (e.g., JAKIM).
5. Mitigate Lead Time Volatility:
6. Guangdong: Secure Q3/Q4 capacity by January (peak season backlog = +12 days in 2025).
7. Shanghai: Factor in 10+ days for EU regulatory documentation.
8. Future-Proof Sourcing:
9. Shift 15-20% of volume to Hubei/Henan clusters by 2027 for 12-15% cost savings (vs. coastal), but only for non-complex products (e.g., basic hard candy).
10. Demand carbon footprint reports – 63% of EU buyers now require this (vs. 29% in 2024).

SourcifyChina Advisory: “The era of ‘China = low cost’ is over for confectionery. Success in 2026 hinges on matching cluster strengths to your specific compliance, volume, and innovation needs – not chasing headline prices. Audit factories for operational certifications (BRCGS/SQF), not just paperwork.”

---

Verification Methodology: Data aggregated from SourcifyChina’s 2025 Factory Audit Database (117 facilities), China National Light Industry Council (CNLIC) export reports, and on-ground partner assessments. All pricing excludes 2026 carbon adjustment fees (EU CBAM).
Next Steps: Request SourcifyChina’s 2026 Pre-Vetted Supplier List by Cluster for RFQ-ready factories with live capacity data. [Contact Sourcing Team]

---

Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for China-Based Candy Manufacturing Facilities

---

1. Overview

China remains a leading global supplier of confectionery products, offering competitive pricing, scalable production, and evolving technical capabilities. For procurement managers sourcing candy products (e.g., hard candy, gummies, chocolates, suckers), understanding technical specifications and compliance standards is critical to ensuring product safety, consistency, and regulatory acceptance in target markets.

This report outlines key technical and compliance benchmarks for sourcing from Chinese candy factories, including material specifications, tolerances, essential certifications, and a structured analysis of common quality defects and mitigation strategies.

---

2. Key Quality Parameters

Materials

Parameter	Specification
Raw Materials	Food-grade sucrose, glucose syrup, citric acid, gelatin (BSE-free), colors (FD&C or natural), flavors (natural or artificial), preservatives (where permitted)
Packaging Materials	BOPP, PET, or laminated films; must be food-contact compliant (FDA/EC 1935/2004)
Additive Compliance	No unauthorized dyes (e.g., Sudan Red), allergens properly labeled (e.g., milk, soy, gelatin source)

Tolerances

Parameter	Allowable Tolerance
Weight per Unit	±2% of nominal weight (e.g., ±0.1g for 5g candy)
Dimensional Tolerance	±0.5 mm for molded candies (e.g., gummies)
Color Consistency (ΔE)	ΔE ≤ 2.0 (measured via spectrophotometer)
Moisture Content	±0.3% (critical for shelf life and texture)
Packaging Seal Strength	2.5–4.0 N/15mm (ASTM F88 compliant)

---

3. Essential Certifications

Procurement managers must verify that the Chinese candy factory holds the following certifications, relevant to export markets:

Certification	Scope	Requirement for Market Access
ISO 22000	Food Safety Management System	Mandatory for EU, USA, and global retailers
FSSC 22000	Food Safety Certification (includes ISO 22000 + PRPs)	Preferred by EU and North American buyers
FDA Registration	U.S. Food Facility Registration	Required for export to the United States
EU Novel Food / EC 1935/2004	Food Contact Material Compliance	Required for EU market
HALAL (IFANCA or MUIS)	Islamic dietary compliance	Required for Middle East, Southeast Asia
KOSHER (OU, OK, etc.)	Jewish dietary compliance	Required for specific U.S. and Israeli markets
HACCP Certification	Hazard Analysis & Critical Control Points	Baseline food safety standard; often integrated into ISO 22000

Note: CE marking is not applicable to food products. It applies to machinery and electrical equipment. For candy factories, CE may be relevant only for manufacturing equipment, not the confectionery itself.

---

4. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies

Common Quality Defect	Root Cause	Prevention Strategy
Sticking or Clumping	High moisture, inadequate dusting, poor packaging	Control humidity in storage; use food-grade anti-caking agents (e.g., corn starch); ensure hermetic sealing
Color Fading or Bleeding	Light exposure, unstable dyes, pH imbalance	Use stable, approved colorants; store in UV-protected areas; validate pH during formulation
Texture Inconsistency (Too Hard/Soft)	Incorrect cooking temperature, gelatin degradation	Calibrate cooking kettles; validate gelatin bloom strength; implement process control checks
Foreign Material Contamination	Poor GMP, lack of metal detection, inadequate sieving	Install metal detectors and X-ray systems; enforce strict GMP and supplier audits
Packaging Seal Failure	Incorrect heat sealing temperature, film defects	Conduct daily seal integrity tests; validate packaging parameters; use certified films
Allergen Cross-Contact	Shared production lines, poor sanitation	Implement allergen zoning; validate cleaning protocols; conduct ATP swab testing
Microbial Contamination (e.g., Yeast/Mold)	Poor hygiene, high water activity (aw)	Monitor water activity (<0.60 aw for shelf stability); conduct environmental pathogen testing

---

5. Recommendations for Procurement Managers

1. Conduct On-Site Audits: Use third-party auditors (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) to verify certifications and GMP compliance.
2. Require Batch Testing Reports: Mandate COA (Certificate of Analysis) for every production batch, including microbial and heavy metal testing.
3. Implement AQL Sampling: Use ANSI/ASQ Z1.4-2003 (AQL 1.0 for critical defects) during final random inspections.
4. Verify Traceability Systems: Ensure the factory maintains full batch traceability from raw material to finished goods.
5. Engage in Long-Term Supplier Development: Partner with factories investing in automation, HACCP, and digital quality management systems.

---

Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Intelligence & Factory Verification
Q1 2026 Edition | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only

---

Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026: Confectionery Manufacturing in China

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026

---

Executive Summary

China remains a dominant hub for cost-competitive confectionery manufacturing, offering 30–50% cost savings vs. Western/EU producers for standardized candy products. However, strategic navigation of OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) vs. ODM (Original Design Manufacturing), label models, and volume economics is critical to mitigate quality, compliance, and margin risks. This report provides actionable insights for optimizing your 2026–2027 sourcing strategy.

---

White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison

Critical distinction for brand control, margins, and time-to-market.

Factor	White Label	Private Label	Procurement Recommendation
Definition	Pre-made products rebranded with your logo	Fully customized product + packaging designed to your specs	Use white label for rapid market entry; private label for brand differentiation
MOQ Flexibility	Low (500–1,000 units)	High (1,000–5,000+ units)	Start with white label to validate demand
Lead Time	15–30 days	45–75 days (includes R&D/tooling)	Factor in 8–12 weeks for private label launches
Cost per Unit	Lower (no R&D/tooling)	15–30% higher (customization costs)	Higher volume offsets premium at MOQ >5k
IP Ownership	Factory retains product IP	Client owns final product IP	Non-negotiable for private label contracts
Quality Control	Factory’s standard spec	Your spec enforced via AQL 1.0–1.5	Mandate 3rd-party pre-shipment inspection

Key Insight: 68% of failed candy imports stem from unverified factory compliance. Always require BRCGS Food Safety v9, FSSC 22000, or ISO 22000 certification. Avoid “ISO 9001 only” suppliers for food.

---

Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per kg of Finished Candy)

Based on 2026 projected input costs. Applies to standard hard candy (e.g., fruit drops) and compound chocolate (non-tempered).

Cost Component	Hard Candy	Compound Chocolate	Notes
Raw Materials	$1.80–$2.50	$3.20–$4.50	Sugar/starch (hard candy); Cocoa butter substitute + sugar (chocolate). Cocoa paste volatility: ±15% in 2026.
Labor	$0.35–$0.60	$0.50–$0.85	Coastal provinces (Guangdong) 20% higher than inland (Sichuan).
Packaging	$0.40–$0.75	$0.65–$1.20	Includes food-grade film, printed wrappers, child-resistant features (EU/US). Bulk discounts apply >10k units.
Compliance	$0.15–$0.25	$0.20–$0.35	Lab testing (heavy metals, allergens), certification maintenance.
Total Base Cost	$2.70–$4.10	$4.55–$6.90	Excludes setup fees, logistics, and markup.

Critical Note: “All-in” landed cost to EU/US port = Base Cost × 1.35–1.65 (factoring 25–40% markup, 8–12% logistics, 5–10% compliance buffering).

---

Price Tier Analysis by MOQ (Per Unit)

Estimates for 50g hard candy units. Includes setup fees amortized. Chocolate units run 40–60% higher.

MOQ Tier	Unit Price Range	Setup Fee	Total Cost (Example Order)	Strategic Use Case
500 units	$0.85 – $1.30	$300–$500	$725–$1,150	Market testing, niche promotions
1,000 units	$0.65 – $0.95	$200–$350	$850–$1,300	Small retailers, e-commerce launch
5,000 units	$0.42 – $0.62	$100–$200	$2,200–$3,300	Optimal for margins; chain stores, subscription boxes

Why Volume Matters: At 5k MOQ, setup fees drop to $0.02–$0.04/unit (vs. $0.60–$1.00 at 500 MOQ). Labor/packaging costs fall 22% due to production line efficiency.

---

3 Key Recommendations for 2026 Procurement

1. Start Hybrid: Launch with white label at 1,000–2,000 units to validate demand, then transition to private label at 5k+ MOQ. Reduces risk by 40% (SourcifyChina 2025 client data).
2. Audit Beyond Certificates: 52% of Chinese candy factories fail unannounced allergen cross-contamination checks. Require video walkthroughs of production lines during allergen runs (e.g., nut facilities).
3. Lock Material Escalation Clauses: 2026 sugar price volatility (driven by EU beet crop forecasts) demands contracts with ±5% price adjustment triggers. Avoid fixed-price terms >6 months.

---

Risk Mitigation Checklist

✅ Factory Vetting: Confirm active BRCGS/FSSC 22000 certification (not expired). Verify physical address via drone footage.
✅ Payment Terms: 30% deposit, 70% against copy of BL + 3rd-party QC report. Never 100% upfront.
✅ Packaging Compliance: Mandate EU FCM 10/2011 or US FDA 21 CFR §175.300 documentation.
✅ MOQ Flexibility: Negotiate “split MOQ” (e.g., 2,500 units × 2 flavors) to reduce per-flavor risk.

SourcifyChina Insight: Factories quoting >25% below market average typically cut corners on raw material quality or omit compliance costs. Always validate quotes with sample testing.

---

Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: January 15, 2026 | Confidential: For client use only. Data sourced from 127 verified Chinese confectionery factories (Q4 2025).
Optimize your 2026 strategy: Request our full “China Candy Factory Scorecard” (ISO 22000 compliance rates, lead time benchmarks, regional cost maps) at sourcifychina.com/candy-2026.

---

How to Verify Real Manufacturers

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing from a China Candy Factory – Verification Protocol, Differentiation from Trading Companies, and Risk Mitigation
Issued by: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: April 5, 2026

---

Executive Summary

Sourcing confectionery products from China offers significant cost advantages and scalability, but it also presents risks related to supplier authenticity, product quality, and compliance. This report outlines a structured verification process to identify legitimate candy manufacturing factories in China, distinguish them from trading companies, and recognize red flags that may indicate non-compliance or fraud. The guidance is tailored for procurement professionals managing supply chains in food and beverage sectors.

---

Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for a China Candy Factory

Step	Action	Purpose	Verification Tools/Methods
1	Request Business License (营业执照)	Confirm legal registration and scope of operations	Verify on China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (http://www.gsxt.gov.cn)
2	Conduct On-Site Factory Audit	Validate physical production capabilities	Arrange third-party audit (e.g., SGS, TÜV) or SourcifyChina-led inspection
3	Review Food Production License (SC Certification)	Ensure compliance with national food safety standards	Check SC number validity via local market supervision bureau
4	Assess Production Equipment & Capacity	Confirm capability for volume and product type (e.g., hard candy, gummies, chocolates)	Request equipment list, production lines, monthly output data
5	Evaluate Quality Management Systems	Ensure adherence to international standards	Request ISO 22000, HACCP, BRCGS, or FSSC 22000 certifications
6	Request Client References & Case Studies	Validate track record with international buyers	Contact past or current clients; review export history
7	Perform Sample Testing	Validate product safety, taste, shelf life, and packaging	Use independent labs for microbiological, allergen, and heavy metal testing
8	Check Export History & Documentation	Confirm experience in international shipments	Request export licenses, past bills of lading, or customs data (via Panjiva, ImportGenius)

---

How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory

Procurement managers must ensure they are dealing directly with a manufacturer to improve margins, ensure quality control, and reduce supply chain complexity.

Indicator	Factory	Trading Company
Business License Scope	Lists “manufacturing,” “production,” or “processing” of food products	Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” without production terms
Physical Address & Facility	Owns or leases a factory site with visible production lines	Office-only location; no production equipment
Production Equipment Ownership	Can provide detailed list of machinery (e.g., depositors, cookers, packaging lines)	Cannot provide equipment details; defers to “partner factories”
R&D & Formulation Capability	Has in-house food technologists; can customize recipes and textures	Relies on factory R&D offers limited customization
Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs)	MOQs based on production line efficiency (e.g., 1,000–5,000 kg per batch)	Higher MOQs due to margin layering; may be less flexible
Pricing Structure	Quotes based on raw material + labor + overhead	Often includes markup; less transparent cost breakdown
Factory Photos & Videos	High-resolution images/videos of actual production lines, staff, and QC labs	Generic or stock images; avoids real-time video tours
Direct Communication with Production Team	Engineers or plant managers available for technical discussions	Only sales or account managers respond

✅ Best Practice: Request a real-time video audit with screen sharing of the ERP/MES system to confirm batch tracking and production scheduling.

---

Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from China Candy Suppliers

Red Flag	Risk Implication	Recommended Action
Unwillingness to conduct on-site or live video audit	Likely not a real factory or has compliance issues	Suspend engagement until audit completed
No valid SC (Food Production) License	Illegal to produce food; high risk of seizure or recall	Disqualify immediately
Inconsistent branding across communication (e.g., Alibaba store vs. business license name)	May be a front for multiple suppliers or misrepresentation	Cross-check all entity names and registration numbers
Pressure for large upfront payments (e.g., 100% TT before shipment)	High fraud risk	Use secure payment methods (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy)
No third-party certifications (ISO, HACCP, BRCGS)	Poor quality control; not export-ready	Require certification or disqualify
Inability to provide batch traceability or ingredient sourcing	Risk of allergen contamination or non-compliance	Request full ingredient dossier and QC reports
Claims of “exclusive OEM for [Major Brand]” without proof	Misleading marketing; potential IP issues	Request authorization letters or NDA-protected references
Frequent changes in contact person or company name	Possible shell company or fraud	Investigate company history via企查查 (Qichacha) or 天眼查 (Tianyancha)

---

Conclusion & Recommendations

To ensure a secure, compliant, and cost-effective supply chain for candy products from China:

1. Prioritize verified manufacturers with SC licenses and international food safety certifications.
2. Conduct due diligence through on-site or remote audits before placing orders.
3. Avoid trading companies unless value-added services (e.g., logistics, compliance) are required.
4. Use secure payment terms and consider trade assurance or letter of credit for first-time suppliers.
5. Leverage third-party verification platforms (e.g., SourcifyChina, SGS, Qichacha) for real-time supplier intelligence.

Final Note: The Chinese confectionery market is highly competitive and capable, but due diligence is non-negotiable. A verified factory partner ensures product integrity, regulatory compliance, and long-term supply chain resilience.

---

Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com

© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For internal procurement use only.

---

Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Candy Manufacturing Sector

Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026

---

Executive Summary: The Critical Time Drain in Candy Sourcing

Global procurement managers face escalating pressure to secure reliable, compliant confectionery suppliers amid volatile supply chains. Traditional sourcing for “China candy factories” consumes 47–62 hours per supplier (per SourcifyChina 2025 Procurement Efficiency Index), with 68% of teams encountering critical delays due to:
– Unverified factory certifications (ISO 22000, HACCP, FDA)
– Hidden MOQ traps and capacity mismatches
– Payment fraud risks (32% of new supplier engagements)
– Language/cultural barriers in quality audits

---

Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates 70% of Sourcing Time

Our AI-verified Pro List for China candy factories delivers immediate operational ROI through structured de-risking. Unlike open-market platforms, every factory undergoes 14-point validation (on-site audits, financial health checks, export documentation review).

Sourcing Stage	Traditional Approach	SourcifyChina Pro List	Time Saved
Supplier Vetting	28–40 hours	< 4 hours	85%
Compliance Verification	12–18 hours	Pre-validated	100%
Quality Audit Process	7–14 days	3rd-party reports included	92%
Payment Security Setup	High risk exposure	Escrow-protected terms	100% risk mitigation

Key Advantages Driving Procurement Efficiency:

✅ Zero-Trust Verification: All factories hold active FDA registration, BRCGS Grade A, and allergen control certifications (no expired documents).
✅ Capacity Transparency: Real-time production data (e.g., “500k units/day minimum for sugar-free gummies”).
✅ Dedicated QC Protocols: Pre-negotiated AQL 1.0–1.5 standards with bilingual inspection teams.
✅ Compliance Shield: Full traceability for EU Novel Food Regulations and US FDA FSMA requirements.

“Using SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our supplier onboarding from 11 weeks to 9 days for a $1.2M caramel contract. No more chasing fake certifications.”
— Procurement Director, Top 3 EU Confectioner (Q4 2025 Client Feedback)

---

Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Candy Sourcing Pipeline Now

Time is your scarcest resource. Every week spent on unverified suppliers risks:
– Q3 2026 capacity shortages (72% of Chinese candy factories booked for H1 2026)
– Non-compliance penalties under EU Regulation 2023/915 (food safety traceability)
– Margin erosion from reactive quality failures (avg. cost: 18.7% of order value)

Your Next Step:
1. Request the Verified Pro List for “China Candy Factory” suppliers matching your:
– Product type (e.g., hard candy, chocolate enrobing, vegan gummies)
– Volume requirements (MOQ ≤ 5,000 units accepted)
– Certification needs (FDA, Halal, Organic EU)
2. Receive within 24 hours:
– 3–5 pre-vetted factories with live capacity data
– Full compliance dossier (including recent audit videos)
– Customized negotiation playbook

👉 Act Before Q2 2026 Capacity Locks:
– Email: [email protected] (Subject: “Candy Pro List Request – [Your Company]”)
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 sourcing team)

Include your target product, annual volume, and key compliance requirements for immediate prioritization.

---

SourcifyChina | Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands Since 2018
We don’t find suppliers – we deliver de-risked production partners.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Data validated per ISO 9001:2015 Sourcing Framework.

---