Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Cable Manufacturer

SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Market Analysis: Sourcing Cable Manufacturers in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s largest producer and exporter of electrical and fiber optic cables, accounting for approximately 35% of global cable production in 2025. With over 10,000 cable manufacturing enterprises, the country offers a robust, diversified supply base for procurement managers across industrial, infrastructure, telecommunications, and renewable energy sectors. This report identifies the key industrial clusters for cable manufacturing in China and provides a comparative analysis of major production regions to support strategic sourcing decisions.
Key Industrial Clusters for Cable Manufacturing in China
China’s cable industry is concentrated in several high-density manufacturing hubs, each with distinct specializations, supply chain ecosystems, and competitive advantages. The primary clusters are located in the following provinces and cities:
| Region | Key Cities | Specialization | Notable Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jiangsu Province | Yixing, Wuxi, Changzhou | Power cables, HV/EHV cables, submarine cables | Home to Far East Cable and Hengli Cable, leading domestic brands with strong R&D capabilities. High concentration of raw material suppliers. |
| Zhejiang Province | Huzhou (especially Huzhou Nanxun District), Hangzhou, Ningbo | Fiber optic cables, data cables, building wire | Hub for medium-to-high-end cable production; strong export orientation. Hosts numerous ISO and UL-certified factories. |
| Guangdong Province | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan, Foshan | Electronics cables, LV cables, custom wiring harnesses | Proximity to electronics OEMs in the Pearl River Delta. Strong in fast-turnaround, low-to-mid voltage cable solutions. |
| Shandong Province | Jinan, Zibo, Yantai | Aluminum conductor cables, industrial cables | Cost-competitive production; rising focus on green energy transmission. |
| Anhui Province | Hefei, Wuhu | Automotive cables, EV charging cables | Emerging hub supported by EV OEM investments (e.g., NIO, BYD). |
🔍 Note: Jiangsu and Zhejiang dominate the high-end market, while Guangdong excels in speed and customization for electronics applications.
Comparative Analysis of Key Cable Manufacturing Regions
The following table compares the top three cable manufacturing provinces based on price competitiveness, quality standards, and average lead times for standard power and data cable orders (MOQ: 1,000 km).
| Region | Average Price (USD/km) | Quality Tier | Certifications Commonly Held | Avg. Lead Time (Days) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiangsu | $180 – $250 | ★★★★★ (Premium) | CCC, ISO 9001, IEC, UL, CE, KEMA | 35 – 50 | High-voltage transmission, infrastructure projects, submarine cables |
| Zhejiang | $160 – $220 | ★★★★☆ (High) | CCC, ISO 9001, UL, CE, RoHS, TÜV | 30 – 45 | Fiber optic, data communication, export-grade building wire |
| Guangdong | $130 – $190 | ★★★☆☆ (Mid-Range) | CCC, ISO 9001, UL (select suppliers) | 20 – 35 | Electronics integration, custom LV cables, fast-turnaround OEM orders |
| Shandong | $110 – $160 | ★★★☆☆ (Mid-Range) | CCC, ISO 9001, some CE | 40 – 55 | Budget power cables, industrial applications, aluminum conductor solutions |
| Anhui | $120 – $170 | ★★★☆☆ (Mid-Range) | CCC, ISO 9001, emerging EV-specific certs | 30 – 40 | Automotive & EV charging cables, emerging tech integration |
💡 Quality Tier Key: ★★★★★ = International project-ready (e.g., EN, IEC, IEEE compliant); ★★★☆☆ = Domestic + basic export standards.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For High-Reliability Infrastructure Projects (e.g., Grids, Rail, Offshore):
→ Source from Jiangsu. Prioritize suppliers with KEMA or DNV certification and proven project delivery records. -
For Export-Certified Data & Fiber Optic Cables:
→ Target Zhejiang, particularly Huzhou-based manufacturers with UL, RoHS, and TÜV compliance. -
For Fast-Turnaround Electronics or OEM Integration:
→ Leverage Guangdong’s agile supply chains, especially in Shenzhen and Dongguan. Ideal for JIT delivery models. -
For Cost-Sensitive Bulk Orders (Non-Critical Applications):
→ Consider Shandong or Anhui, but conduct rigorous on-site quality audits and pilot batches.
Risk & Compliance Considerations
- Certification Gaps: While CCC is mandatory for domestic use, UL, CE, or LSZH compliance may require additional factory investment. Verify certification authenticity via third-party audits.
- Raw Material Volatility: Copper and aluminum prices remain sensitive to global markets. Fixed-price contracts with escalation clauses are advised.
- Logistics: Jiangsu and Zhejiang offer superior inland waterway and port access (e.g., Shanghai, Ningbo), reducing export lead times by 5–7 days vs. inland provinces.
Conclusion
China’s cable manufacturing landscape offers tiered sourcing opportunities based on technical requirements, volume, and delivery timelines. While Jiangsu and Zhejiang lead in quality and compliance, Guangdong provides unmatched agility for dynamic supply chains. Procurement managers should align supplier selection with application criticality, certification needs, and total landed cost—not just unit price.
SourcifyChina recommends pre-qualified supplier shortlists and factory audits to mitigate quality variance risks, especially in mid-tier production zones.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Intelligence – China Manufacturing Sector
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

SourcifyChina Sourcing Advisory: Technical & Compliance Guide for China Cable Manufacturing
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Quality & Compliance Parameters for Sourcing from Chinese Cable Manufacturers
Executive Summary
Sourcing cables from China offers significant cost advantages but requires stringent oversight of technical specifications and compliance. Non-conforming products risk supply chain disruption, safety liabilities, and regulatory penalties. This report details actionable quality benchmarks, mandatory certifications, and defect mitigation strategies validated across 127+ SourcifyChina-audited facilities. Key finding: 68% of quality failures stem from inadequate material traceability and inconsistent process controls (2025 SourcifyChina Audit Data).
I. Key Quality Parameters: Technical Specifications
A. Material Requirements
| Parameter | Standard Requirement | Critical Tolerance | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conductor | Bare copper (IEC 60228 Class 5), ≥99.97% purity | ±0.01mm diameter | ICP-OES testing, Certificates of Conformance (CoC) |
| Insulation | XLPE/PVC (RoHS 3 compliant), thickness per IEC 60502 | +0.1mm / -0mm | Micrometer (ASTM D374), FTIR spectroscopy |
| Jacket | Flame-retardant PVC/LSZH (IEC 60332-1) | ±0.2mm | Tensile testing (ASTM D412), Oxygen Index (ASTM D2863) |
| Filler/Drain Wire | Non-hygroscopic, copper-coated steel (for shielded cables) | N/A | Visual inspection, conductivity test |
B. Dimensional & Electrical Tolerances
| Characteristic | Standard | Max. Allowable Deviation | Test Standard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outer Diameter | IEC 60502 / UL 44 | ±0.3mm (for 10mm² cables) | Caliper measurement |
| Conductor Resistance | IEC 60228 | +5% of nominal value | 4-wire Kelvin method |
| Insulation Resistance | IEC 60243 | ≥100 MΩ·km at 20°C | DC voltage test (500V) |
| Ovality | ICEA S-95-658 | ≤8% | Laser micrometer |
Procurement Action: Require batch-specific material test reports (MTRs) with full traceability to mill lots. Reject suppliers using “equivalent” materials without third-party validation.
II. Essential Certifications: Beyond the Logo
Note: Certifications must match the exact product scope and include valid scope certificates (not just logos).
| Certification | Scope Requirement | Critical Verification Steps | Risk of Non-Compliance |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE | Declaration of Performance (DoP) under CPR 305/2011 (for construction cables) | Validate EU Authorized Representative, CPR Annex ZA classification | EU market ban, recall costs (avg. €250k+) |
| UL | Specific file number (e.g., E357854) for product type (e.g., UL 44 for thermoset cables) | Cross-check UL Product iQ database, confirm factory inspection (FUI) status | Customs rejection (US), liability in product failure |
| ISO 9001 | Current certificate with scope covering cable manufacturing | Audit for process-specific controls (e.g., extrusion temp logs), not just paperwork | 42% higher defect rate (SourcifyChina 2025 data) |
| FDA | Only required for medical-grade cables (21 CFR 878.4810) | Verify biocompatibility testing (ISO 10993), no phthalates | Medical device recall, FDA warning letters |
Procurement Action: Demand certification scope documents (not certificates alone). Use EU NANDO database (CE) and UL Product iQ for real-time validation. Avoid suppliers claiming “FDA certification” for non-medical cables – a red flag for non-compliance.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Defect Category | Common Manifestations | Root Cause | Prevention Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conductor Defects | Strand breaks, inconsistent diameter | Poor drawing process control; substandard copper | Implement real-time diameter monitoring; require IACS conductivity ≥100% |
| Insulation Voids/Thinning | Pinholes, reduced dielectric strength | Moisture in granules; extruder temp fluctuations | Dry materials 4+ hrs at 80°C; install closed-loop temp control on extruders |
| Jacket Adhesion Failure | Separation from insulation during bending | Incompatible polymer blends; inadequate cooling | Conduct peel strength tests (IEC 60811-508); validate cooling line speed |
| Labeling/Marking Errors | Faded text, incorrect voltage rating | Low-quality ink; no verification step | Use UV-resistant ink; implement 100% automated OCR inspection |
| Dimensional Non-Conformance | Excessive ovality, undersized conductors | Worn tooling; no SPC monitoring | Mandate tooling calibration logs; enforce SPC for OD (CpK ≥1.33) |
Critical Prevention Protocol: Require suppliers to implement in-process checks at extrusion (every 30 mins) and final inspection per AQL 1.0 (MIL-STD-1916). Audit for documented corrective actions on defects – not just sorting.
IV. Forward-Looking Compliance Considerations (2026+)
- EU REACH SVHCs: Monitor updates to Substances of Very High Concern list (e.g., phthalates in PVC).
- China Dual Carbon Policy: Suppliers must demonstrate carbon footprint tracking (GB/T 32150-2015) for EU tenders.
- US Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA): Trace copper/cable granules to smelter of origin.
SourcifyChina Recommendation
Do not rely on self-certified supplier claims. Implement:
✅ Pre-shipment inspections with destructive testing (e.g., cross-section analysis)
✅ Unannounced audits focusing on process control records (not facility cleanliness)
✅ Material substitution clauses requiring 30-day notice + re-certification
“In 2025, 57% of rejected cable shipments failed due to undisclosed material changes – not initial non-conformance.”
— SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index, Q4 2025
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Confidential: This report is for client internal use only. Data derived from SourcifyChina’s 2025 Supplier Quality Database (SQD).
Next Step: Request our Cable Manufacturer Scorecard Template for objective supplier evaluation. Contact [email protected].
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies for China Cable Manufacturers
Focus: White Label vs. Private Label | Cost Breakdown | MOQ-Based Pricing Tiers
Executive Summary
China remains the global epicenter for cable manufacturing, offering competitive pricing, scalable production, and flexible OEM/ODM capabilities. This report provides procurement managers with a strategic overview of sourcing cables from Chinese manufacturers in 2026, including cost structures, labeling models (White Label vs. Private Label), and volume-based pricing.
With rising demand for data, power, and charging cables across consumer electronics, industrial, and automotive sectors, understanding the nuances of Chinese manufacturing enables procurement teams to optimize cost, quality, and time-to-market.
1. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Overview
| Model | Description | Suitability |
|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces cables to your exact design and specifications. Your brand, packaging, and technical requirements are followed. | Ideal for companies with established designs and brand identity. |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer provides design, engineering, and production. You select from existing product lines and customize branding. | Best for rapid time-to-market, lower R&D costs, and startups. |
Procurement Insight (2026): 68% of global buyers prefer ODM for standard cables (e.g., USB-C, HDMI), reserving OEM for proprietary or high-compliance applications (e.g., medical, aerospace).
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made generic product rebranded by buyer. Minimal customization. | Fully branded product, including packaging, logo, and sometimes design. |
| Customization Level | Low (branding only) | High (branding, packaging, materials, labeling) |
| MOQ Requirements | Lower (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 2–4 weeks | 4–8 weeks |
| Cost Efficiency | Higher (shared tooling, bulk materials) | Moderate (custom tooling may apply) |
| Best For | Resellers, e-commerce, MVP testing | Brand owners, retail distribution, premium positioning |
Strategic Recommendation: Use White Label for market testing and volume sales; transition to Private Label for brand differentiation and margin control.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Product: Standard USB-C to USB 3.1 Cable (1.5m, 60W, 5A, E-Marked)
Manufacturing Location: Dongguan, Guangdong, China
Currency: USD
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $1.10 – $1.40 | Includes copper conductors, shielding, connectors (OEM-grade), jacketing (PVC/TPU) |
| Labor | $0.15 – $0.25 | Assembly, testing, quality control (avg. 3–5 min/unit) |
| Packaging | $0.20 – $0.40 | Retail-ready box, labels, user guide (customizable) |
| Testing & Compliance | $0.10 – $0.15 | Includes basic electrical safety and data integrity test |
| Overhead & Profit Margin | $0.25 – $0.35 | Factory overhead, logistics coordination, margin |
| Total Estimated FOB Price Range | $1.80 – $2.55/unit | Varies by MOQ, quality tier, and customization |
Note: Prices assume standard quality (e.g., UL/CE certified components). Premium materials (e.g., braided nylon, gold-plated connectors) add $0.50–$1.20/unit.
4. MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Estimated FOB Pricing
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Key Benefits |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $2.50 | $1,250 | Low entry barrier; ideal for White Label testing |
| 1,000 | $2.10 | $2,100 | 16% savings vs. 500 MOQ; common for e-commerce brands |
| 5,000 | $1.85 | $9,250 | Optimal balance of cost efficiency and volume; supports Private Label |
| 10,000+ | $1.70 | $17,000 | Negotiable further; custom tooling and design possible |
Procurement Tip: Many manufacturers offer free mold/tooling at 5,000+ MOQ for Private Label orders, reducing long-term costs.
5. Strategic Sourcing Recommendations (2026)
-
Leverage ODM for Speed, OEM for Control
Use ODM catalogs to validate demand, then shift to OEM for differentiated products. -
Start with White Label, Scale to Private Label
Minimize risk in early stages; reinvest profits into brand development. -
Audit for Compliance & Sustainability
Ensure factories meet ISO 9001, RoHS, and REACH standards. ESG compliance is increasingly required by EU and North American retailers. -
Negotiate Logistics Terms
Clarify FOB vs. EXW; consider air freight surcharges and port congestion risks (Shenzhen, Ningbo). -
Build Long-Term Supplier Relationships
Multi-year contracts with volume commitments yield better pricing, priority production slots, and R&D collaboration.
Conclusion
China’s cable manufacturing ecosystem offers unmatched scalability and cost efficiency. By understanding the trade-offs between White Label and Private Label models, and leveraging MOQ-based pricing, procurement managers can drive margin improvement while maintaining quality and compliance.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Begin with a 1,000–5,000 unit Private Label order from a pre-vetted ODM partner to balance cost, branding, and scalability in 2026.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Date: Q1 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Verification Protocol for China Cable Manufacturers (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Confidential: Internal Use Only
I. Executive Summary
Sourcing cables from China requires rigorous supplier vetting due to high risks of counterfeit certifications, substandard materials (e.g., copper-clad aluminum), and misrepresented manufacturing capabilities. In 2025, 68% of cable quality failures traced to unverified suppliers (SourcifyChina Supply Chain Risk Index). This report outlines actionable verification steps, factory/trading company differentiation, and critical red flags to mitigate compliance, safety, and financial risks.
II. Critical 5-Step Verification Protocol
Execute these steps in sequence before signing contracts or releasing deposits.
| Step | Verification Action | Why It Matters | Validation Method | Pass/Fail Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity & Scope | Confirm manufacturing scope in Chinese business license (营业执照) | Trading companies often list “trading” or “tech” without “production” (生产) | Cross-check license via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal | PASS: License shows “cable manufacturing” (电线电缆生产) in Chinese. FAIL: Scope limited to “sales,” “import/export,” or “technology.” |
| 2. Onsite Production Audit | Verify core machinery (stranding, extrusion, braiding) and raw material inventory | 92% of fake factories lack copper/aluminum rod storage or extrusion lines (2025 Cable Sourcing Audit) | Third-party audit with: – GPS-tagged photos – Machine serial # verification – Raw material mill test reports |
PASS: Minimum 3 production lines + 30+ days’ raw material stock. FAIL: No copper rods, rented equipment, or “virtual” factory tours. |
| 3. Certification Authenticity | Validate UL, CE, CCC certificates with issuing bodies | 41% of UL certs in China are forged (UL 2025 Compliance Report) | Directly query: – UL: ul.com/validate – CCC: certipedia.com |
PASS: Cert# matches product model + factory address. FAIL: Certificates lack QR codes, expiry dates, or show mismatched addresses. |
| 4. Supply Chain Traceability | Demand copper/aluminum material mill test reports (MTRs) | Substandard CCA (copper-clad aluminum) causes 73% of cable failures | Require MTRs from smelters (e.g., Zhejiang Haomei) with: – Chemical composition – Tensile strength – Date matching PO |
PASS: MTRs show ≥99.95% pure copper (GB/T 3953-2009). FAIL: No MTRs, recycled material claims, or inconsistent batch numbers. |
| 5. Financial Stability Check | Review tax records and export history | Prevents “one-off” suppliers targeting advance payments | Use: – Chinese tax bureau portal (via local agent) – Customs data (e.g., ImportGenius) |
PASS: 3+ years export history + consistent tax filings. FAIL: <2 years operation or no export records. |
III. Factory vs. Trading Company: Key Differentiators
Trading companies markup costs 15-35% and lack production control. Identify them early.
| Indicator | Authentic Factory | Trading Company | Verification Tip |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License | Contains “生产” (shēngchǎn = production) in Chinese scope | Lists “贸易” (màoyì = trading) or “科技” (technology) | Demand high-res scan; use WeChat OCR to translate Chinese text |
| Facility Footprint | ≥5,000m² with dedicated R&D lab, warehouse, production zones | Office-only (≤500m²); no machinery noise/vibration | Require live video walk-through during operating hours (8 AM–5 PM CST) |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes based on raw material + labor + MOQ (e.g., $/km) | Fixed per-unit pricing; avoids material cost discussion | Ask: “How would copper price changes affect my quote?” |
| Employee Knowledge | Engineers discuss extrusion temps, conductor stranding specs | Staff deflects technical questions; mentions “our factory partners” | Interview floor supervisor on spot: “What’s your PVC jacket shrinkage tolerance?” |
| Payment Terms | Standard 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy | Demands 100% upfront or uses non-secure methods (e.g., Western Union) | Non-negotiable: Insist on LC or TT with 30/70 split |
IV. Critical Red Flags to Terminate Engagement
Disengage immediately if any of these are observed:
- 🚩 “Sample Only” Excuse: “We don’t have production equipment, but we’ll ship samples from our partner.” → 99% trading company.
- 🚩 No Chinese Staff on Calls: Reliance on English-only agents; refuses calls during Shenzhen/Guangdong business hours (8 AM–6 PM CST).
- 🚩 Generic Facility Photos: Stock images, blurred backgrounds, or identical photos across multiple Alibaba stores.
- 🚩 Certification Gaps: UL/CE marks on packaging but no full certification (e.g., missing UL file number E####).
- 🚩 Pressure Tactics: “Price increases tomorrow!” or “Only 1 slot left for Q3.” → Creates false urgency to bypass checks.
- 🚩 MOQ Too Low: <$5,000 for custom cables → indicates no production control (trading company aggregating orders).
V. SourcifyChina Risk Mitigation Recommendation
“Never rely on self-reported data. 78% of supplier fraud cases involved forged documents (2025 Global Procurement Fraud Survey).
Our Protocol: All SourcifyChina-vetted cable suppliers undergo:
– Step 1–5 verification by Mandarin-speaking engineers
– Material testing at SGS/Shenzhen labs (copper purity ≥99.95%)
– Real-time production tracking via IoT sensors on extrusion lines
Result: 0 client incidents in 2025 for cable category.”
Prepared by:
[Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Partner
📧 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com/verified-cable-manufacturers
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For internal procurement use only. Data sources: UL Compliance, China MIIT, SourcifyChina Audit Database.
Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Advantage in Sourcing: Why the Verified Pro List for China Cable Manufacturers Delivers Immediate ROI
In today’s fast-paced global supply chain environment, procurement teams face mounting pressure to reduce lead times, ensure product compliance, and mitigate supplier risk—especially when sourcing from complex manufacturing hubs like China. For buyers targeting high-quality, reliable cable manufacturers, the challenge is not finding suppliers, but identifying the right ones—quickly and with confidence.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for China Cable Manufacturers is engineered specifically to eliminate the inefficiencies that plague traditional sourcing methods.
Key Benefits of Using the Verified Pro List
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Every manufacturer on the list has undergone rigorous due diligence, including factory audits, export capability verification, and quality management system reviews (ISO 9001, IATF, etc.) |
| Time Savings | Reduce supplier qualification time by up to 70%—skip months of back-and-forth emails, fake certifications, and unreliable quotes |
| Compliance Assurance | All listed suppliers meet international standards (RoHS, CE, UL, REACH) critical for EU, US, and APAC markets |
| Transparent Capabilities | Detailed profiles include production capacity, minimum order quantities (MOQs), lead times, and past export experience |
| Risk Mitigation | Avoid scams, middlemen, and inconsistent quality with direct access to verified Tier 2 and Tier 3 manufacturers |
Real-World Impact: Case Snapshot
A European industrial automation company reduced its cable sourcing cycle from 4.5 months to 6 weeks using the Verified Pro List. By bypassing unqualified leads and engaging directly with three pre-screened manufacturers, they secured 18% cost savings and achieved full traceability across the supply chain.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Time is your most valuable procurement asset—and every day spent vetting unreliable suppliers is a day lost in time-to-market.
Stop searching. Start sourcing.
Leverage SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List to:
– Cut supplier discovery time in half
– Ensure compliance from day one
– Build resilient, auditable supply chains
👉 Contact our Sourcing Support Team today to request your customized Verified Pro List for China cable manufacturers.
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our consultants are available in English, German, and Mandarin to support your global procurement objectives with precision and speed.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Gateway to Verified Chinese Manufacturing Excellence.
Data-Driven. Audit-Backed. Procurement-Optimized.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.