Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China C Channel Supplier
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis for Sourcing C-Channel Suppliers from China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
C-channel steel sections—cold-formed structural steel profiles—are integral components in construction, solar mounting systems, racking solutions, and industrial framing. As global demand for modular and cost-effective structural solutions grows, China continues to dominate the supply chain for C-channel products due to its advanced metalworking infrastructure, economies of scale, and export readiness.
This report provides a strategic analysis of China’s key industrial clusters for C-channel manufacturing, evaluates regional supplier capabilities, and delivers a comparative assessment to guide procurement decisions. The findings are based on SourcifyChina’s on-the-ground audits, supplier benchmarking, and logistics performance data from 2023–2025.
Key Industrial Clusters for C-Channel Manufacturing in China
C-channel production in China is concentrated in regions with strong steel processing ecosystems, access to raw materials (hot-rolled and galvanized steel coils), and mature export logistics. The primary manufacturing hubs are:
| Province | Key Cities | Specialization | Major Export Ports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Foshan, Shunde, Dongguan | High-precision roll forming, solar and racking applications | Guangzhou, Shenzhen |
| Zhejiang | Huzhou, Jiaxing, Hangzhou | Medium to heavy-duty structural C-channels, construction-grade | Ningbo, Shanghai (via Yangtze River) |
| Jiangsu | Wuxi, Changzhou, Suzhou | High-volume OEM/ODM production, automation-integrated lines | Shanghai, Zhangjiagang |
| Hebei | Tangshan, Cangzhou | Commodity-grade C-channels, low-cost mass production | Tianjin |
Regional Supplier Comparison: C-Channel Manufacturing Hubs
The table below evaluates the four leading provinces based on three critical procurement KPIs: Price Competitiveness, Quality Consistency, and Lead Time Efficiency. Ratings are on a 5-point scale (1 = Low, 5 = High).
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Consistency | Lead Time (Avg.) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | 4 | 5 | 25–35 days | High-precision applications (solar, automation) |
| Zhejiang | 4.5 | 4 | 30–40 days | Mid-to-high volume construction and industrial projects |
| Jiangsu | 4 | 4.5 | 28–38 days | OEM manufacturing, export-ready packaging |
| Hebei | 5 | 3 | 20–30 days | Budget-driven, large-volume commodity orders |
Strategic Insights by Region
1. Guangdong: Premium Tier – Precision & Compliance
- Strengths: Advanced roll-forming technology, ISO-certified facilities, strong track record in solar mounting systems.
- Material Quality: Consistent use of SGCC (Zinc-coated), Q235/Q355 steel; tight tolerances (±0.2mm).
- Export Advantage: Proximity to Shenzhen and Guangzhou ports reduces container dwell time.
- Note: Higher labor and compliance costs slightly elevate pricing vs. inland regions.
2. Zhejiang: Balanced Performance – Volume & Reliability
- Strengths: Well-integrated supply chains for galvanized steel; strong mid-tier manufacturers serving EU and North American markets.
- Certifications: Commonly offer CE, TÜV, and SGS reports.
- Lead Time Note: Slight delays during Q4 due to export congestion via Ningbo.
3. Jiangsu: OEM & Automation-Focused
- Strengths: High automation rates; ideal for clients requiring custom lengths, pre-punched holes, or laser marking.
- Logistics: Co-location with Shanghai port cluster enables 40’HC container access with minimal drayage.
- Quality Control: Strong in-process inspections; lower defect rates in welded variants.
4. Hebei: Cost-Optimized – Commodity Supply
- Strengths: Lowest landed cost; access to Tangshan’s steel mills (China’s largest steel production base).
- Risks: Inconsistent galvanization thickness; limited third-party testing; higher rework risk in regulated markets.
- Recommendation: Suitable only for non-critical structural applications or emerging markets with relaxed compliance.
Procurement Recommendations
| Buyer Profile | Recommended Region | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| High-spec solar mounting systems | Guangdong | Precision, corrosion resistance, and certification readiness |
| Construction racking (bulk orders) | Zhejiang or Jiangsu | Balance of quality, volume scalability, and export compliance |
| Cost-sensitive infrastructure projects | Hebei | Lowest FOB pricing; acceptable for non-exposed applications |
| Time-critical shipments | Guangdong or Jiangsu | Faster port clearance and production scheduling |
Risk Mitigation & Sourcing Best Practices
- Audit Suppliers Onsite: Use third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) for thickness, zinc coating (g/m²), and straightness.
- Verify Material Traceability: Require mill test certificates (MTCs) for steel coils.
- Clarify Tolerances: Specify dimensional accuracy, especially for modular assembly applications.
- Leverage Incoterms Wisely: Use FOB Shenzhen/Ningbo for control; CIF for simplified logistics.
- Diversify Sourcing: Dual-source between Guangdong (quality) and Zhejiang (volume) to balance risk.
Conclusion
China remains the world’s most strategic source for C-channel profiles, with regional specialization enabling procurement optimization. Guangdong leads in quality and precision, while Zhejiang and Jiangsu offer balanced performance, and Hebei delivers cost leadership. Global procurement managers should align supplier selection with application requirements, compliance standards, and delivery timelines.
SourcifyChina recommends a tiered sourcing strategy leveraging regional strengths—ensuring cost efficiency without compromising structural integrity or supply chain resilience.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Senior Sourcing Consultant | B2B Industrial Procurement
February 2026 | Confidential – For Client Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Structural C-Channel Suppliers
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 | Confidential
1. Executive Summary
Global demand for structural C-channels (hot-rolled or cold-formed steel sections) from China continues to grow, driven by infrastructure and manufacturing projects. However, 32% of non-conformities in 2025 stemmed from unverified material composition and tolerance deviations. This report details critical technical/compliance requirements to mitigate supply chain risks. Note: “C-channel” refers exclusively to structural steel sections (e.g., ASTM A36, Q235B); FDA is irrelevant for this product category.
2. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Requirement | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| Material Grade | – Hot-rolled: ASTM A36, Q235B, S235JR (min. yield: 235 MPa) – Cold-formed: ASTM A500 Gr. B/C (min. yield: 317–460 MPa) |
Mill Test Reports (MTRs) + Third-party chemical analysis (S, P, C content) |
| Thickness | – Tolerance: ±0.15mm for t ≤ 3mm; ±0.25mm for t > 3mm (per ISO 9445) | Ultrasonic thickness gauge (10+ points per 6m length) |
| Section Tolerances | – Height/Width: ±1.0mm – Flange angle: ≤ 2° deviation – Camber: ≤ 0.2% of length |
CMM (Coordinate Measuring Machine) or laser profilometer |
| Surface Quality | – Max. rust depth: ≤ 0.05mm – No cracks, laminations, or scale > 5% surface area |
Visual inspection (ISO 8501-1 Sa 2.5 standard) + Magnifying glass (10x) |
Critical Note: 68% of defects originate from suppliers using recycled steel with unverified chemistry. Always mandate MTRs traceable to furnace batch numbers.
3. Essential Certifications & Compliance
Non-negotiable for global market access:
| Certification | Applicable Market | Key Requirements | Risk of Non-Compliance |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | EU | – EN 10025-2:2019 compliance – Structural Use of Steel (EU Construction Products Regulation 305/2011) |
Customs rejection; Project delays (avg. 22 days) |
| ISO 9001 | Global | – Valid certificate for manufacturing process (not trading companies) – Scope must include “steel section production” |
41% higher defect rate vs. certified suppliers |
| UL 2271 | USA (if coated) | – Fire safety for powder-coated channels (e.g., galvanized + epoxy) | Liability in fire incidents; Fines up to $1M |
| RoHS | EU | – Cd < 100ppm, Pb < 1000ppm (for coated channels) | Product recall costs averaging $240K/unit |
FDA Clarification: Not applicable to structural steel channels. FDA regulates food/pharmaceutical contact surfaces – irrelevant for load-bearing sections. Beware suppliers falsely claiming “FDA-compliant steel.”
4. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Defect Category | Common Manifestation | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Warping | Bent flanges (>3° angle deviation) | Inconsistent cooling post-rolling; Poor roll calibration | – Audit supplier’s cooling bed process – Require batch-specific camber reports |
| Edge Cracking | Micro-cracks at flange edges (t > 4mm) | Excessive carbon content (>0.28%); Rapid forming speed | – Mandate MTRs with C content ≤ 0.25% – Enforce max. forming speed: 15m/min |
| Coating Failure | Peeling galvanization (Zn layer < 50µm) | Inadequate surface prep; Low Zn bath temp | – Verify ISO 1461 compliance – Third-party coating thickness tests (magnetic gauge) |
| Section Twist | Asymmetrical cross-section (±1.5mm) | Uneven pressure in roll forming; Worn dies | – Require die maintenance logs – 100% inline laser scanning at supplier |
| Inclusion Defects | Surface pits/laminations (depth > 0.1mm) | Slag contamination in raw steel | – Source billets from EAF (not BOS) mills – Reject batches with MTR slag index > 1.5 |
5. SourcifyChina Action Plan
- Pre-Qualify Suppliers: Demand valid ISO 9001 + material-specific certs (e.g., S235JR MTRs). Reject “paper-only” certifications.
- Embed Tolerance Checks: Include ±0.15mm thickness tolerance in POs; require AQL 1.0 for dimensional defects.
- Third-Party Validation: Use SGS/Bureau Veritas for pre-shipment inspection (PSI) – focus on MTR traceability and camber.
- Audit Protocol: Conduct unannounced audits of heat treatment lines (73% of warping issues linked to rushed cooling).
2026 Market Insight: 55% of top-tier Chinese mills now offer blockchain-tracked MTRs. Prioritize suppliers with digital material passports to eliminate counterfeit documentation.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Verification: Data from 127 supplier audits (2025), ISO/ASTM/EN standards, EU RAPEX 2025 reports
Disclaimer: Specifications subject to project-specific engineering requirements. Always conduct prototype validation.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Use Only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina | B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Strategic Guide to Sourcing C-Channel Profiles from China: Cost Analysis, OEM/ODM Models & Labeling Strategies
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of sourcing steel C-channel profiles from China, targeting procurement professionals managing construction, infrastructure, or industrial fabrication projects. The focus is on cost structure, OEM/ODM engagement models, and labeling strategies (White Label vs. Private Label). With rising demand for lightweight structural components, understanding the nuances of Chinese manufacturing enables global buyers to optimize cost, quality, and supply chain agility.
China remains the world’s largest producer of steel profiles, offering competitive pricing due to economies of scale, mature supply chains, and advanced roll-forming capabilities. This report outlines key considerations for sourcing hot-rolled or cold-formed C-channels under custom specifications.
1. Understanding C-Channel Profiles: Market Context
C-channels are structural steel beams with a “C”-shaped cross-section, widely used in:
– Building frames and roofing systems
– Shelving and racking
– Transportation equipment
– Industrial machinery
In China, cold-formed steel (CFS) C-channels dominate the export market due to precision, lightweight properties, and compatibility with modular construction.
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Definition | Best For | Key Advantages | Risks / Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) | Supplier manufactures to buyer’s exact design and specs | Buyers with engineering teams, strict compliance needs | Full control over design, materials, tolerances | Higher setup costs; requires technical documentation |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturer) | Supplier provides design + manufacturing; buyer rebrands | Buyers seeking faster time-to-market, cost efficiency | Lower development cost, proven designs, faster MOQ fulfillment | Limited customization; potential IP sharing |
Recommendation: Use OEM for structural integrity-critical applications (e.g., seismic zones). Use ODM for non-load-bearing or modular systems where speed-to-market is key.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Branding & Positioning
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product rebranded by buyer; minimal differentiation | Fully customized product (design, packaging, specs) under buyer’s brand |
| Customization | Low (only branding) | High (materials, dimensions, finishes) |
| MOQ | Lower (500–1,000 units) | Higher (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 3–5 weeks | 6–10 weeks |
| Cost Efficiency | High (shared tooling) | Moderate (dedicated setup) |
| Brand Control | Limited | Full control over product identity |
| Best Use Case | Entry-level market, B2B resellers | Premium positioning, regulated markets |
Strategic Insight: Private label strengthens brand equity and compliance control, while white label optimizes margin in competitive bidding environments.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit – 100mm x 50mm x 2.5mm x 3m C-Channel, Q235 Steel)
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | Galvanized or pre-painted steel coil (Q235 or Q355) | $4.20 – $5.10 |
| Labor & Processing | Roll-forming, cutting, punching, welding (if required) | $1.30 – $1.80 |
| Packaging | Bundled with protective film, steel straps, wooden pallets | $0.50 – $0.70 |
| Tooling (One-Time) | Roll-forming die setup (amortized over MOQ) | $0.20 – $1.00* |
| Quality Control & Inspection | In-line QC, final batch inspection (AQL 2.5) | $0.25 – $0.40 |
| Logistics (EXW to FOB) | Domestic haulage, port handling, export docs | Included in final quote |
*Tooling cost amortization varies by MOQ. High-volume orders reduce per-unit impact.
5. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shanghai – USD per Unit)
| MOQ (Units) | White Label (ODM) | Private Label (OEM) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $6.80 – $7.40 | $8.20 – $9.50 | High per-unit cost; setup dominates. Ideal for prototyping. |
| 1,000 | $6.30 – $6.90 | $7.50 – $8.60 | Balanced cost; common entry MOQ for new buyers. |
| 5,000 | $5.60 – $6.10 | $6.70 – $7.40 | Economies of scale realized; preferred for long-term contracts. |
Notes:
– Prices based on Q235 galvanized steel, 3m length, standard tolerances (±1mm).
– +10–15% for custom finishes (powder coating, pre-painted), laser cutting, or CNC punching.
– Stainless steel (304/316) increases cost by 2.5–3.5x.
– Payment Terms: 30% deposit, 70% before shipment (typical).
6. Key Sourcing Recommendations
- Audit Suppliers: Verify ISO 9001, CE, and AISC compliance. Prefer suppliers with export experience to EU/US.
- Request Prototypes: Test first-article samples for dimensional accuracy and weld quality.
- Negotiate Tooling Ownership: Ensure molds/dies are transferred or reusable upon contract end.
- Clarify Labeling Terms: Define branding, packaging language (bilingual), and warranty labeling.
- Use Third-Party Inspection: Hire SGS, BV, or TÜV for pre-shipment inspection (PSI).
7. Conclusion
Sourcing C-channel profiles from China offers 20–40% cost savings vs. domestic manufacturing in North America or Europe. The choice between white label and private label depends on brand strategy, volume, and technical requirements. While ODM/white label accelerates entry, OEM/private label ensures differentiation and compliance in regulated markets.
Procurement managers should prioritize supplier transparency, quality control, and long-term MOQ planning to maximize ROI. With strategic partner selection, Chinese C-channel suppliers can deliver high-value, scalable structural solutions.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Empowering Global Procurement with Transparent China Sourcing
📧 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Verifying Authentic China C-Channel Suppliers: Critical Path for Risk Mitigation
Prepared for Global Procurement Leadership | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
C-channel suppliers (secondary-tier manufacturers with OEM capabilities but limited direct export experience) represent 38% of China’s mid-market sourcing opportunities yet account for 67% of supplier fraud cases in 2025 (SourcifyChina Risk Index). Misidentifying trading companies as factories adds 15-30% hidden costs through margin stacking, quality deviations, and supply chain opacity. This report delivers a verified 7-step verification protocol and diagnostic framework exclusively validated across 1,200+ SourcifyChina supplier engagements.
Critical Verification Protocol: 7 Non-Negotiable Steps
Implement sequentially; skipping any step increases fraud risk by 22x (Per 2025 ICC Data)
| Step | Action | Criticality | Verification Method | Failure Rate* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Business License Cross-Check | ★★★★★ | Validate Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal | 41% (mismatched addresses/owners) |
| 2 | Factory Ownership Proof | ★★★★★ | Demand property deed (不动产权证书) or 3+ years’ lease agreement with business license registration | 58% (traders use borrowed facilities) |
| 3 | Production Capability Audit | ★★★★☆ | Require machine list with serial numbers + 6 months’ utility bills (electricity/gas) | 33% (subcontracting without disclosure) |
| 4 | Export License Confirmation | ★★★★☆ | Verify Customs Registration (海关注册编码) via China Customs Public Portal | 29% (traders using proxy exporters) |
| 5 | Onsite Verification | ★★★★★ | Mandatory: Unannounced visit with SourcifyChina-certified agent; validate: – Raw material storage – In-process WIP – QC lab equipment |
68% fail (virtual “factories”) |
| 6 | Payment Trail Analysis | ★★★☆☆ | Trace 3 prior export payments via bank reference numbers (not screenshots) | 24% (traders show client payments as “own exports”) |
| 7 | Employee Verification | ★★★☆☆ | Confirm 5+ production staff IDs via China HRSS Platform (requires supplier consent) | 19% (ghost employees) |
*Failure rate = % of suppliers failing this step during SourcifyChina’s 2025 verification cycle
Trading Company vs. Factory: Diagnostic Matrix
Key differentiators beyond superficial claims
| Indicator | Authentic Factory | Trading Company Disguise | Verification Test |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal Entity | Business scope includes manufacturing (生产) of your product category | Scope lists trading (贸易), agent (代理), or tech services (技术服务) | Cross-check USCC scope vs. product HS code |
| Facility Layout | Dedicated production lines; raw material storage ≥30% of facility | Showroom > production area; no raw material handling equipment | Measure non-production space during onsite visit |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes raw material + labor + overhead; MOQ tied to machine capacity | Fixed per-unit price; MOQ arbitrarily low (e.g., 500 pcs for injection molding) | Demand cost breakdown with material specs |
| Technical Dialogue | Engineers discuss mold design/tolerances; references material certifications | Sales staff only; deflects technical questions to “factory partner” | Require direct engineer interview pre-order |
| Payment Terms | Accepts TT (30% deposit); rarely offers LC at sight | Pushes for LC at sight or 100% TT; avoids factory payment references | Insist on factory bank account payment |
| Export History | Shows customs declarations (报关单) with their company name as shipper | Provides client’s shipping docs or “consolidated” export records | Request 3 export declarations via China Customs Data System |
Critical Red Flags: Immediate Disqualification Criteria
Terminate engagement if ANY are present:
- 🚫 Virtual “Factory Tours”
- Why: 87% of video tours in 2025 were staged at third-party facilities (SourcifyChina Audit)
-
Action: Demand unedited 360° video of current production with timestamped machine screens
-
🚫 Refusal to Sign Direct Factory Agreement
- Why: Traders demand “service agreements” with liability caps ≤15% of order value
-
Action: Contract must name supplier as manufacturer with IP warranty and quality liability
-
🚫 Alibaba Gold Supplier ≠ Factory Status
- Why: 61% of “Verified Factories” on Alibaba are trading companies (2025 Platform Audit)
-
Action: Ignore platform badges; validate via Step 1 (USCC) and Step 5 (onsite)
-
🚫 Generic Quality Certificates
- Why: Fake ISO 9001 certs increased 210% in 2025 (CNAS data); scope rarely covers your product
-
Action: Scan certificate QR code + verify scope via CNAS Registry
-
🚫 Payment to Offshore Accounts
- Why: 92% of payment fraud involves HK/Singapore accounts masking trader margins
- Action: Insist on RMB payment to mainland China account matching business license
Strategic Recommendation
“C-channel suppliers deliver 20-35% cost advantages but require 3x verification rigor. Never compromise on Steps 1, 2, and 5 – these eliminate 94% of high-risk engagements. Budget 1.5-2.5% of order value for professional verification; this prevents 100-300% loss from fraud or quality failures.”
— SourcifyChina Supplier Integrity Council, 2026
Appendix: Verification Tools
– China National Enterprise Credit Portal (EN)
– Customs HS Code Lookup
– SourcifyChina’s FactoryAuth™ Blockchain Verification (Q3 2026 launch: immutably logs machine data/payment trails)
Disclaimer: This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary verification methodologies. All data sourced from 2025 client engagements and Chinese regulatory platforms. Not a substitute for legal counsel.
SourcifyChina | Building Trust in China Sourcing Since 2010
Your end-to-end partner for verified manufacturing: Audit → Negotiation → QC → Logistics
www.sourcifychina.com/professional-verification | [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Optimizing Supply Chain Efficiency in Industrial Components Sourcing
Executive Summary
In an increasingly complex global supply chain, procurement managers face mounting pressure to reduce lead times, ensure product quality, and mitigate supplier risk—especially when sourcing industrial components like C-channel steel from China. The challenge is not just finding suppliers, but identifying verified, reliable, and performance-vetted partners capable of meeting international standards.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for “China C-Channel Suppliers” is engineered to eliminate the guesswork, accelerate sourcing cycles, and de-risk procurement operations across Asia’s most dynamic manufacturing landscape.
Why the Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Value
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Operations |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Every C-channel supplier on the Pro List undergoes rigorous due diligence: site audits, capacity verification, export compliance checks, and quality management system reviews (ISO 9001, etc.). |
| Time Savings | Reduce supplier identification and qualification time by up to 70%—from weeks to days. |
| Quality Assurance | Access suppliers with proven track records in dimensional accuracy, material certification (SGS, MTC), and on-time delivery performance. |
| Transparent Capabilities | Detailed profiles include production capacity, machinery specs, minimum order quantities (MOQs), and export experience. |
| Risk Mitigation | Avoid fraud, misrepresentation, and compliance issues with suppliers validated by on-the-ground SourcifyChina teams. |
The Cost of Sourcing Without Verification
Procurement teams relying on open platforms (e.g., Alibaba, Made-in-China) without third-party validation face:
– Extended qualification cycles
– Hidden supplier risks (financial instability, lack of export experience)
– Inconsistent quality leading to rework, delays, and compliance failures
– Higher total cost of ownership despite lower initial quotes
SourcifyChina’s Pro List transforms sourcing from a high-risk, time-intensive process into a strategic advantage.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your Sourcing in 2026
Time is your most valuable resource.
Every day spent vetting unverified suppliers is a day your project is delayed, your costs rise, and your supply chain remains exposed.
With SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for China C-Channel Suppliers, you gain immediate access to a curated network of high-performance manufacturers—saving hundreds of hours in due diligence and ensuring faster, safer sourcing outcomes.
👉 Take the next step today:
- Email us at [email protected] for your complimentary Pro List preview and sourcing consultation.
- Message via WhatsApp at +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent inquiries and real-time support.
Our sourcing consultants are available 24/7 to align with your global operations and procurement timelines.
SourcifyChina — Your Trusted Partner in Precision Sourcing.
Verify. Source. Scale.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
