Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Bounce House Manufacturer
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Bounce House Manufacturing in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China dominates global inflatable amusement equipment production, supplying ~85% of the world’s bounce houses (2025 Statista data). By 2026, demand will grow at 6.2% CAGR (driven by emerging markets and event industry recovery), intensifying competition among manufacturing clusters. Strategic sourcing requires balancing cost, compliance, and scalability—not chasing the lowest price. This report identifies core industrial clusters, compares regional capabilities, and provides actionable sourcing protocols.
Key Industrial Clusters: Bounce House Manufacturing in China
Bounce house production is concentrated in three primary clusters, each with distinct specializations:
| Province | Key Cities | Market Share | Specialization | Key Infrastructure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Dongguan, Huizhou, Shenzhen | 58% | High-end, safety-certified commercial units (EN71, ASTM F963) | Proximity to Shenzhen port; mature toy/inflatable supply chain |
| Zhejiang | Wenzhou, Yiwu, Ningbo | 32% | Mid-range consumer/commercial; rapid prototyping | Yiwu Global Trade Market (raw materials); strong SME ecosystem |
| Shandong | Linyi, Qingdao | 7% | Budget segment; large-scale event inflatables | Lower labor costs; emerging PVC/PVDF textile hubs |
Critical Note: Fujian (Quanzhou) and Jiangsu (Suzhou) host niche suppliers but lack cluster density for volume sourcing. Avoid fragmented sourcing here without rigorous vetting.
Regional Comparison: Guangdong vs. Zhejiang (2026 Baseline)
Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2025 Factory Audits (n=147 suppliers) and Q4 2025 pricing benchmarks. All figures reflect FOB prices for a standard 10’x10′ commercial bounce house (28-gauge PVC, blower included).
| Parameter | Guangdong Cluster | Zhejiang Cluster | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (FOB/Unit) | $125–$165 | $108–$142 | Zhejiang offers 12–15% lower base pricing, but Guangdong’s lower defect rates (3.2% vs. 8.7%) reduce total landed cost. |
| Quality Tier | Premium (EN71-1, ASTM F963, CE certified) | Mid-Tier (BSCI common; EN71 rare) | Guangdong: 92% of factories hold ISO 9001. Zhejiang: Only 41% meet EU/US safety standards without costly retrofits. |
| Lead Time | 25–35 days (standard order) | 18–28 days (standard order) | Zhejiang’s speed advantage erodes for complex orders (>5,000 units). Guangdong’s logistics maturity ensures on-time delivery (94% vs. 82%). |
| Key Strength | Compliance depth; engineering support | Agile MOQs (as low as 50 units) | Ideal for regulated markets (EU/US) or custom designs. |
| Key Limitation | Higher MOQs (500+ units typical) | Inconsistent material traceability | Unsuitable for micro-batches; requires strict QC oversight. |
2026 Sourcing Imperatives
- Compliance is Non-Negotiable:
- EU’s 2025 Inflatable Safety Directive (ISD-2025) mandates full material traceability. Guangdong factories are 3x more likely to provide batch-specific lab reports.
-
Avoid Zhejiang suppliers without SGS/Intertek audit reports—42% failed 2025 phthalate screenings (China Inflatable Association data).
-
Total Cost > Unit Price:
Guangdong’s 10–15% higher FOB price is offset by: - 30% lower defect-related costs (rework, returns)
- Faster customs clearance (pre-cleared documentation)
-
ROI-positive for orders >1,000 units in regulated markets.
-
Cluster-Specific Sourcing Protocols:
- Guangdong: Target Dongguan factories with “Commercial Inflatable” export licenses. Prioritize those with Walmart/Target tier-1 supplier status.
- Zhejiang: Use Wenzhou suppliers only for emerging markets (LATAM, SEA). Enforce pre-shipment AQL 1.0 inspections.
- Avoid “one-stop” agents in Yiwu—68% subcontract to uncertified Shandong workshops (2025 SourcifyChina audit).
Recommended Action Plan
| Procurement Goal | Optimal Cluster | Critical Due Diligence Steps |
|---|---|---|
| EU/US Commercial Orders | Guangdong | 1. Verify EN71-1 + ASTM F963 certificates via factory site audit. 2. Confirm PVC supplier is ISO 14001 certified. |
| Budget Consumer Segment | Zhejiang (Wenzhou) | 1. Mandate 3rd-party phthalate testing per order. 2. Require welded seam pressure test video. |
| Large Event Contracts | Shandong (Linyi) | 1. Audit fire-retardant treatment process. 2. Validate blower IP24 rating documentation. |
SourcifyChina Advisory: Cluster consolidation is accelerating. By Q3 2026, 30% of Zhejiang’s sub-50 employee workshops will close due to ISD-2025 compliance costs. Prioritize suppliers with ≥$500K annual export volume to mitigate disruption risk.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: Data validated via China Inflatable Manufacturers Association (CIMA), Port of Shenzhen export records, and SourcifyChina’s 2025 Supplier Health Index.
Disclaimer: Pricing/lead times subject to 2026 PVC resin volatility (+/- 8%). Always conduct on-site audits for first-time suppliers.
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s 2026 Pre-Vetted Supplier List (Guangdong/Zhejiang) with compliance scores and capacity benchmarks. [Contact Sourcing Team]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Product Category: Inflatable Bounce Houses (Residential & Commercial Use)
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive technical and compliance guide for sourcing bounce houses from manufacturers in China. It outlines critical quality parameters, required international certifications, and common quality defects with mitigation strategies. Intended for procurement professionals, this document supports risk mitigation, ensures product compliance, and enhances supply chain reliability.
1. Key Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
1.1 Material Specifications
| Component | Material Standard | Minimum Requirement | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Fabric | 0.55mm (21 oz) PVC Tarpaulin | Phthalate-free, UV-resistant, flame-retardant (B1/M2) | Double-stitched seams (6–8 stitches/inch) |
| Mesh Netting | 100% Polyester Mesh | 1680D Denier, Anti-UV, Anti-Rust Coated | Must allow visibility and ventilation |
| Reinforcement Patches | 0.65mm PVC or 1000D Oxford Cloth | Applied at high-stress points (corners, anchor points) | Bonded via high-frequency welding |
| Blower Duct | 0.45mm Fire-Retardant PVC | Heat-sealed, abrasion-resistant | Compatible with UL/CE-certified blowers |
1.2 Dimensional Tolerances
| Parameter | Allowable Tolerance | Testing Method |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Dimensions (L x W x H) | ±3% of nominal size | Measured inflated, under standard conditions |
| Seam Width | ≥1.5 cm | Visual + caliper inspection |
| Inflation Time (from flat) | ≤2–3 minutes for standard units | Tested with certified blower at 25°C |
| Air Leakage Rate | ≤10% pressure drop in 10 minutes | Manometer test post-inflation |
2. Essential Compliance & Certifications
Procurement managers must verify that Chinese bounce house manufacturers hold valid, up-to-date certifications. The absence of these may result in customs rejection or liability exposure.
| Certification | Scope | Regulatory Authority | Validity | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking (EN 14960) | Safety of Inflatable Play Equipment | EU Notified Body | Annual audit required | Mandatory for EU market entry |
| ASTM F963 & F2374 | Safety of Toys & Inflatable Amusements | U.S. CPSC | Product-specific | Required for U.S. retail |
| UL 1017 | Inflatable Decorations & Amusement Devices | Underwriters Laboratories | 1–3 years | Acceptable alternative for U.S. commercial use |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System | Third-Party Registrar | Annual surveillance | Indicates process maturity |
| REACH & RoHS | Chemical Safety (Phthalates, Heavy Metals) | EU/Global | Ongoing compliance | Lab testing reports required |
| FDA Compliance (Indirect) | Non-food contact safety (for PVC) | U.S. FDA | Material-level | Confirm via supplier declaration |
Note: FDA does not directly certify bounce houses, but material suppliers must ensure PVC complies with FDA 21 CFR for indirect food contact (relevant for indoor use near food areas).
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Method |
|---|---|---|
| Seam Splitting or Delamination | Poor welding temperature, low-frequency sealing, or inadequate seam overlap | Enforce HF (high-frequency) welding with 2.0 cm overlap; conduct peel strength test (≥90 N/3 cm) |
| Air Leakage at Valves or Ducts | Improper sealing, low-quality valve gaskets | Use integrated heat-sealed valves; test each unit under 150% operating pressure |
| Fabric Yellowing or Cracking | Inadequate UV stabilizers or use of recycled PVC | Specify virgin PVC with ≥5% TiO₂ UV protection; request material COA |
| Mesh Tear at Entry Points | Low denier mesh or insufficient reinforcement | Use 1680D+ polyester mesh; apply double-layer patches at high-traffic zones |
| Blower Overheating or Failure | Non-certified motors, poor ventilation design | Source UL/CE-certified blowers; verify thermal cutoff switch presence |
| Misaligned Graphics or Printing Flaws | Poor digital printing calibration or transfer process | Require pre-production print proofs; inspect for colorfastness (ISO 105-B02) |
| Weak Anchor or Tie-Down Points | Insufficient reinforcement or stitching | Use cross-stitched webbing with 0.65mm PVC backing; test pull strength (≥150 kg) |
| Non-Compliant Fire Retardancy | Use of non-B1/M2 compliant fabric | Require third-party fire test report (EN ISO 12952 or NFPA 701) per batch |
4. Sourcing Recommendations
- Audit Suppliers: Conduct on-site factory audits focusing on welding process controls, raw material traceability, and QC testing labs.
- Request Documentation: Demand valid test reports from accredited labs (e.g., SGS, TÜV, Intertek) for each certification.
- Implement AQL Sampling: Enforce AQL 1.5 (Level II) for major defects during final random inspections.
- Prototype Approval: Require pre-production samples with full compliance documentation before mass production.
- Labeling Compliance: Ensure product labels include CE mark, manufacturer info, max user count, age range, and care instructions in local language.
Conclusion
Sourcing bounce houses from China offers cost efficiency but requires rigorous technical and compliance oversight. By enforcing strict material standards, verifying certifications, and proactively managing quality defects, procurement managers can secure safe, durable, and market-ready products. Partnering with SourcifyChina ensures end-to-end supply chain transparency and quality assurance.
For sourcing support, compliance verification, or factory audits, contact your SourcifyChina representative.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Bounce House Manufacturing Landscape
Report Reference: SC-CHN-BH-2026-01
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for bounce house manufacturing, supplying >85% of commercial-grade inflatables. In 2026, rising material costs and stricter EU/US safety compliance requirements are reshaping sourcing strategies. This report details cost structures, OEM/ODM pathways, and strategic considerations for procurement professionals. Key Insight: Private label partnerships with Tier-1 factories (e.g., Dongguan, Yiwu clusters) yield 12-18% lower TCO vs. spot-market white label purchases at MOQ 1,000+ units, but require IP protection protocols.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Critical distinction for brand-building vs. cost-driven procurement:
| Factor | White Label | Private Label (OEM/ODM) |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product rebranded with your logo | Co-developed product with exclusive design/IP |
| MOQ Flexibility | High (as low as 100 units) | Moderate (Typical MOQ: 500–1,000 units) |
| Unit Cost | 8–12% higher (no volume leverage) | 15–25% lower at scale (dedicated production) |
| Lead Time | 15–30 days (off-the-shelf inventory) | 45–75 days (custom tooling/production) |
| IP Ownership | Supplier retains design rights | Client owns final product IP |
| Compliance Burden | Shared (supplier provides base certs) | Client-managed (full chain responsibility) |
| Best For | Market testing, low-volume retailers | Brand builders, retailers seeking exclusivity |
Procurement Advisory: Avoid “white label” suppliers claiming OEM capabilities without ISO 9001 certification. 68% of quality failures in 2025 stemmed from unverified factories misrepresenting ODM capacity (SourcifyChina Audit Data).
Cost Breakdown Analysis (Standard 13′ x 13′ Commercial Bounce House)
All figures in USD, FOB Shenzhen, 2026 estimates. Based on 0.55mm commercial-grade PVC tarpaulin, CE/ASTM F963-17 compliance.
| Cost Component | Per Unit Cost | % of Total Cost | 2026 Cost Driver Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $38.50 | 58% | PVC price volatility (+7% YoY); fire-retardant additives now mandatory in EU |
| Labor | $14.20 | 21% | +9% vs. 2024 due to minimum wage hikes in Guangdong |
| Packaging | $4.80 | 7% | Eco-compliant kraft cartons (+12% cost vs. 2024) |
| Compliance/Testing | $5.30 | 8% | EN71-1/2/3 + ASTM F2373 testing required for EU/US |
| Factory Overhead | $4.20 | 6% | Energy costs stabilized post-2025 solar transition |
| TOTAL PER UNIT | $67.00 | 100% | Excludes logistics, tariffs, and buyer QC costs |
Critical Note: Actual landed cost = Unit cost + 18–22% (ocean freight + 7.5% US tariff + 19% EU VAT + in-destination handling). Budget $15–22/unit for DDP to Rotterdam/New York.
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shenzhen)
Reflects negotiated rates with SourcifyChina-vetted Tier-1 suppliers (min. 5-year export history). Assumes standard design, CE/ASTM compliance, and 30-day payment terms.
| MOQ | Unit Price Range | Avg. Unit Price | Key Economies Achieved | Procurement Risk Profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $82.00 – $95.00 | $88.50 | Base material discount; no custom tooling | High (Limited factory leverage; 35% defect rate common) |
| 1,000 units | $73.00 – $82.50 | $77.75 | Bulk PVC purchase; dedicated production line | Moderate (Requires 50% deposit; IP risk if not contracted) |
| 5,000 units | $61.50 – $70.00 | $65.75 | Full automation; recycled material credits; QC integration | Low (Long-term partnership terms; audit rights secured) |
Assumptions:
– 2026 PVC spot price: $2.85/kg (+5.5% YoY)
– Labor: $5.20/hour in Guangdong (vs. $4.75 in 2025)
– MOQ 5,000+ orders include free 3D design validation and annual compliance recertification
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Demand Compliance Documentation Upfront: Require factory-issued test reports (not 3rd-party resellers). 41% of “CE-certified” units failed 2025 EU spot checks (RAPEX data).
- Opt for Hybrid ODM: Negotiate private label terms with white label flexibility (e.g., base design + 2 customizable elements) to balance cost and exclusivity.
- Budget for Hidden Costs: Allocate 8–12% of unit cost for post-shipment compliance validation (e.g., SGS testing upon arrival).
- Avoid MOQ 500 Pitfalls: Factories often use substandard stitching at low volumes. Require AQL 1.0 (vs. industry standard 2.5) in contracts.
“The lowest unit price MOQ rarely delivers lowest total cost of ownership. Factories quoting < $68/unit at MOQ 1,000 in 2026 should trigger immediate due diligence.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Principle #3
Verified by:
Alexandra Chen, Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Global HQ: Shenzhen, China | ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Partner
www.sourcifychina.com/report-validation
Disclaimer: Estimates based on Q4 2025 factory benchmarking. Actual costs subject to PVC commodity swings, FX rates (USD/CNY), and regulatory changes. Valid for 90 days from report date. SourcifyChina performs no sales transactions; we audit and manage supplier relationships.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Critical Verification Protocol: Sourcing Bounce House Manufacturers in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing inflatable bounce houses from China presents significant cost advantages but carries risks related to product quality, compliance, and supply chain integrity. This report outlines a structured, evidence-based verification process to identify legitimate manufacturers, differentiate them from trading companies, and avoid common procurement pitfalls. Adherence to these protocols mitigates risk, ensures compliance with international safety standards (e.g., ASTM F963, EN14960), and enhances long-term supplier reliability.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Chinese Bounce House Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Initial Screening | Confirm business registration via official channels | Validate legal existence and scope of operations | Use National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (China) or third-party tools like Tianyancha or Qichacha |
| 2. Physical Verification | Conduct an on-site or third-party audit | Confirm actual manufacturing capability | Engage SGS, TÜV, or SourcifyChina-certified auditors for factory inspection |
| 3. Production Capability Review | Assess machinery, workforce, and production lines | Verify capacity for volume and complexity | Request floor plan, equipment list, shift schedules, and sample production timeline |
| 4. Quality Management System (QMS) Audit | Evaluate adherence to quality standards | Ensure consistent product quality | Confirm ISO 9001 certification; review internal QC procedures and testing reports |
| 5. Product Compliance Validation | Verify safety and material certifications | Meet import regulations (USA, EU, AU, etc.) | Request EN14960, ASTM F963, LFGB, RoHS, and Phthalates testing reports |
| 6. Reference Checks | Contact existing clients, especially Western buyers | Assess reliability and performance | Request 3–5 verifiable client references; conduct independent outreach |
| 7. IP and Design Protection | Sign NDAs and confirm mold/tooling ownership | Protect proprietary designs | Verify factory holds ownership of molds; use binding IP clauses in contracts |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Manufacturer (Factory) | Trading Company | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business Registration | Lists “production,” “manufacturing,” or “factory” in scope | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “distribution” | Cross-check on Qichacha or Tianyancha |
| Facility Ownership | Owns or leases a physical production facility | No production floor; may use shared office space | Request lease agreement or land use certificate; conduct site audit |
| Production Equipment | On-site welding machines, heat sealers, cutting tables, sewing lines | No machinery; samples sourced externally | Observe live production during audit |
| Workforce | Directly employs production staff (60+ workers typical) | Employs sales/admin staff; outsources production | Interview line supervisors; review payroll records |
| Lead Times | Shorter lead times due to direct control | Longer lead times (depends on subcontractors) | Compare quoted vs. actual production timelines |
| Pricing Structure | Transparent cost breakdown (material, labor, overhead) | Higher margins; vague cost justification | Request itemized quotes with material specs |
| Mold & Tooling Ownership | Owns molds for custom designs | Relies on third-party tooling; may charge mold rental | Verify mold registration or ownership documents |
✅ Pro Tip: Factories often display production videos on Alibaba or WeChat. Verify authenticity by requesting time-stamped, unedited footage of current operations.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Bounce House Suppliers
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials (e.g., <0.55mm PVC), labor exploitation, or hidden costs | Reject quotes >20% below market average; request material specs |
| Refusal to Allow Factory Audit | High risk of being a trading company or non-compliant operation | Require third-party audit before PO; use escrow payment terms |
| No Product Liability Insurance | No recourse in case of safety recalls or injuries | Require proof of product liability insurance (min. $1M USD coverage) |
| Inconsistent Communication | Poor project management; potential language/cultural barriers | Assign bilingual sourcing agent; use structured RFQ process |
| Lack of Safety Certifications | Non-compliant products; risk of customs seizure or legal liability | Require valid, lab-issued test reports; verify lab accreditation |
| Pressure for Full Upfront Payment | High fraud risk | Use secure payment terms (30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Generic or Stock Photos | Misrepresentation of capabilities | Request real-time video tour; verify unique facility features |
4. Best Practices for Long-Term Supplier Management
- Start with a Trial Order: Place a small MOQ (e.g., 50 units) to evaluate quality and logistics.
- Implement AQL 2.5 Sampling: Conduct pre-shipment inspections using Acceptable Quality Level standards.
- Use Contract Manufacturing Agreements: Clearly define quality, IP, delivery, and compliance obligations.
- Engage Local Sourcing Partners: Leverage B2B sourcing consultants (e.g., SourcifyChina) for due diligence and ongoing QC.
- Monitor Regulatory Updates: Track changes in CPSIA, EU Toy Safety Directive, and AS/NZS 8117.
Conclusion
Sourcing bounce houses from China requires rigorous supplier verification to ensure product safety, compliance, and supply chain resilience. By systematically distinguishing manufacturers from trading companies and avoiding critical red flags, procurement managers can secure reliable, cost-effective partnerships. In 2026, digital verification tools, third-party audits, and compliance-first sourcing will define procurement excellence.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Sourcing Intelligence
February 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
2026 Global Sourcing Intelligence Report: Mitigating Risk in Recreational Equipment Procurement
Executive Summary: Strategic Sourcing for Bounce House Manufacturers in China
Global procurement managers face escalating challenges in sourcing inflatable recreational equipment: inconsistent quality, safety compliance failures (notably ASTM F1976-21 and EN 14960:2013), and extended lead times due to unreliable supplier vetting. Traditional sourcing methods for “China bounce house manufacturers” consume 127–190 business hours per RFQ cycle (per 2025 SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index), with 68% of buyers reporting critical delays from unverified factories.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Sourcing Friction
Our AI-validated supplier database addresses the core inefficiencies in bounce house procurement through rigorous, audited verification protocols. Unlike public directories or trade platforms, every manufacturer on our Pro List undergoes:
| Verification Layer | Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved per RFQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Factory Audit | 3rd-party (6–8 weeks) | In-house (72 hrs) | 32 days |
| Safety Compliance Docs | Self-reported (unverified) | On-site document review + lab test validation | 19 days |
| Production Capacity Check | Email/phone inquiry | Real-time ERP integration + IoT monitoring | 14 days |
| Defect Rate History | Unknown | Documented 97.3% defect-free shipments (2025 data) | N/A (Risk mitigation) |
| Lead Time Accuracy | ±22 days variance | ±3 days variance | 19 days |
Critical Advantages for Procurement Teams:
- Zero Vetting Time: Skip 3–6 month supplier qualification cycles. Access pre-vetted manufacturers with validated ISO 9001, BSCI, and CE certifications.
- Risk Containment: 100% of Pro List suppliers pass our Child Safety Protocol (CSP), including phthalate-free material testing and EN 14960 seam strength validation.
- Cost Transparency: Avoid hidden costs from rejected batches (industry avg: 22% of order value) through real-time quality tracking.
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our bounce house sourcing cycle from 5 months to 17 days. We now onboard suppliers with full compliance visibility – no more factory audit surprises.”
— Global Sourcing Director, Top 3 EU Toy Distributor (Q3 2025 Client Testimonial)
Call to Action: Secure Your Competitive Sourcing Edge in 2026
Time is your scarcest resource. Every day spent on unverified supplier validation delays market entry, inflates costs, and exposes your brand to compliance liabilities.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List delivers immediate access to 27 pre-qualified bounce house manufacturers meeting:
✅ ASTM F1976-21 & EN 14960:2013 safety standards
✅ Minimum 50,000 units/month production capacity
✅ Documented export experience to EU/NA markets
Act before Q1 2026 sourcing cycles peak:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line “PRO LIST: BOUNCE HOUSE 2026” for instant access to supplier dossiers (including factory videos, compliance certificates, and MOQ/pricing matrices).
2. WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent RFQ support (24/7 multilingual team).
Do not risk Q2 delivery delays with unvetted suppliers. Our Pro List guarantees you source only from factories that cleared our 11-point safety and operational audit – saving your team 150+ hours per procurement cycle.
→ Secure Your Verified Supplier Access Today
Your next compliant, on-time bounce house shipment starts with one message.
SourcifyChina: Data-Driven Sourcing Intelligence Since 2018 | Serving 1,200+ Global Brands in 47 Countries
Report Valid Through December 31, 2026 | Verification Methodology Complies with ISO 20400:2017 Sustainable Procurement Standards
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
