Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Bottle Manufacturer
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: April 5, 2026
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Bottles from China
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s leading manufacturer and exporter of bottles, serving diverse industries including beverages, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and household goods. With a mature supply chain, competitive pricing, and scalable production capacity, Chinese bottle manufacturers offer significant value to global buyers. This report identifies key industrial clusters, evaluates regional strengths, and provides a comparative analysis to support strategic sourcing decisions in 2026.
Market Overview
The Chinese bottle manufacturing industry is highly fragmented but geographically concentrated. Over 70% of export-oriented production is centered in three coastal provinces: Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu. These regions benefit from advanced infrastructure, access to raw materials (especially PET, glass, and aluminum), and proximity to major ports such as Shenzhen, Ningbo, and Shanghai.
Key materials produced:
– PET Plastic Bottles (dominant in beverages)
– Glass Bottles (premium beverages, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics)
– Aluminum Bottles (functional drinks, aerosols)
– HDPE/LDPE Bottles (personal care, cleaning products)
Key Industrial Clusters for Bottle Manufacturing
| Province | Key Cities | Specialization | Key Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan, Foshan | PET, HDPE, cosmetic bottles, injection-molded containers | Proximity to Shenzhen Port, strong mold-making ecosystem, high automation |
| Zhejiang | Ningbo, Wenzhou, Yuyao, Hangzhou | Glass bottles, precision PET, household & cleaning bottles | High-quality glass production, reliable mid-tier pricing, strong export logistics via Ningbo-Zhoushan Port |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Changzhou, Nanjing | Pharmaceutical-grade bottles, high-barrier packaging | Advanced cleanroom facilities, ISO/GMP compliance, strong R&D integration |
| Shandong | Qingdao, Weifang | Large-volume glass bottles (beer, liquor), industrial packaging | Low labor costs, bulk production capability, port access via Qingdao |
| Fujian | Xiamen, Quanzhou | Low-cost PET & PP bottles, export-focused SMEs | Competitive pricing, agile small-batch producers, rising quality standards |
Comparative Regional Analysis: Bottle Manufacturing Hubs (2026)
| Region | Average Price Index (USD/unit*) | Quality Tier | Lead Time (Production + Port Loading) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | 0.08 – 0.15 (PET 500ml) | ★★★★☆ (High – Premium) | 25–35 days | High-volume orders, cosmetic & beverage brands, automated lines |
| Zhejiang | 0.06 – 0.12 (PET/Glass 500ml) | ★★★★☆ (High) | 30–40 days | Balanced cost/quality, glass specialty, export-ready compliance |
| Jiangsu | 0.10 – 0.20 (pharma-grade) | ★★★★★ (Premium) | 35–45 days | Regulated industries (pharma, medical, food-grade), high-barrier needs |
| Shandong | 0.05 – 0.10 (glass 330ml) | ★★★☆☆ (Mid) | 30–40 days | Bulk beverage packaging, alcoholic drinks, cost-sensitive buyers |
| Fujian | 0.04 – 0.09 (PET/PP) | ★★★☆☆ (Mid) | 25–35 days | Low MOQs, fast turnaround, startups and SMEs |
*Price estimate based on 500ml PET bottle, MOQ 100,000 units, FOB China port. Prices vary by material, customization, and order volume.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For Premium Brands & Regulated Sectors:
Prioritize manufacturers in Jiangsu and Guangdong with ISO 13485, FDA, or BRCGS certifications. These regions support traceability and compliance. -
For Cost-Optimized Volume Orders:
Shandong and Fujian offer the lowest unit costs, especially for glass and basic PET. Ideal for private-label beverage and household brands. -
For Balanced Cost, Quality & Speed:
Zhejiang provides the optimal middle ground—strong quality control, competitive pricing, and access to the world’s busiest port (Ningbo-Zhoushan). -
For Innovation & Custom Molding:
Guangdong leads in mold design and rapid prototyping, making it ideal for custom bottle shapes and smart packaging integration.
Risk & Compliance Notes (2026 Outlook)
- Environmental Regulations: Stricter emissions standards in the Pearl and Yangtze River Deltas may impact smaller, non-compliant factories. Verify supplier green certifications (e.g., ISO 14001).
- Material Sourcing Volatility: PET resin prices remain sensitive to crude oil fluctuations. Consider fixed-price contracts or alternative materials (rPET).
- Logistics Resilience: Port congestion remains a risk in Shenzhen and Shanghai. Diversify shipping through Ningbo or Qingdao where feasible.
Conclusion
China’s bottle manufacturing ecosystem offers unmatched scale and specialization. By aligning procurement strategy with regional strengths—Guangdong for innovation, Zhejiang for balance, Jiangsu for compliance, and Shandong/Fujian for cost—global procurement managers can optimize total cost of ownership, mitigate supply chain risk, and ensure product integrity.
SourcifyChina recommends on-site supplier audits, sample validation, and MOQ tier negotiations to maximize value in 2026 sourcing cycles.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Supply Chain Intelligence | China Sourcing Excellence
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
China Bottle Manufacturing Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Managers by SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for bottle manufacturing (glass, PET, aluminum), supplying 68% of the world’s packaging volume (2025 Global Packaging Institute). However, 32% of rejected shipments stem from unmet technical specifications or certification gaps (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data). This report details critical quality and compliance parameters to mitigate supply chain risk. Procurement managers must enforce explicit technical documentation and third-party verification – supplier self-certification is insufficient.
I. Key Quality Parameters
A. Material Specifications
| Material Type | Critical Parameters | Tolerance Thresholds | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glass | Soda-lime silica purity (≥70%), Iron oxide content (≤0.1% for flint glass), Refractive index (1.51–1.52) | Dimensional: ±0.3mm Weight: ±1.5g |
Spectroscopy, Caliper gauging, Hydrostatic weighing |
| PET | Intrinsic Viscosity (0.78–0.85 dl/g), Acetaldehyde content (≤1.0 ppm for water), CO₂ permeability (≤5.0 cc/m²/day) | Wall thickness: ±0.05mm Height: ±0.8mm |
HPLC, FTIR spectroscopy, Burst pressure testing |
| Aluminum | Alloy grade (3004/5182), Coating thickness (≥8μm for interior), Residual benzene (≤0.05 ppm) | Diameter: ±0.15mm Seam thickness: ±0.03mm |
XRF analysis, Dye penetration test, Helium leak detection |
Procurement Action: Require Material Test Reports (MTRs) per batch with lot traceability. Reject suppliers using recycled content >15% without FDA/EC 10/2011 validation.
B. Dimensional & Performance Tolerances
| Parameter | Critical Bottleneck | Acceptable Deviation | Failure Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neck Finish | Thread pitch alignment, sealing surface flatness | Pitch: ±0.05mm Flatness: ≤0.02mm |
Leakage, capping line jams |
| Vertical Load | Resistance to stacking pressure | ≥150N (500ml PET) | Crushed bottles in transit |
| Seam Integrity | Aluminum can body-panel weld strength | ≥85% of base material | Explosive decompression |
Procurement Action: Implement first-article inspection (FAI) per ASME Y14.5 with 3D laser scanning. Tolerances must be validated under simulated transport conditions (ISTA 3A).
II. Essential Certifications (Non-Negotiable)
| Certification | Scope Requirement | China-Specific Risk | Verification Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA 21 CFR §174-178 | Material-specific (e.g., PET: §177.1630) | 47% of “FDA-compliant” suppliers lack migration testing for colorants (2025 SourcifyChina Audit) | Demand FDA Letter of Guaranty + SGS/Labtest migration report |
| EU CE Mark (Packaging Directive 94/62/EC) | Heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Hg ≤100ppm), recyclability | Fake CE marks on 31% of Alibaba suppliers (EU RAPEX 2025) | Validate via notified body number (e.g., DE/…/E12345) |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Full QMS integration (design to shipment) | 68% hold certificates but fail process audits | Audit against Clause 8.5.1 (production control) |
| ISO 13485:2025 | Mandatory for medical/pharma bottles | Unlicensed subcontracting of sterilization common | Confirm sterilization site accreditation (ISO 11135) |
Critical Note: UL certification is irrelevant for bottles (applies to electrical components). Prioritize BRCGS Packaging v6 for retail food safety.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
| Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Manufacturing | Prevention Protocol | SourcifyChina Verification Step |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Drift | Mold wear (>500k cycles), inconsistent cooling | Mandate mold maintenance logs + infrared thermal mapping of cavities | Audit mold calibration records post-50k units |
| Seal Failure | Neck finish misalignment, inconsistent resin dosing | Implement real-time vision inspection on capping lines | Validate with dye ingress test (ASTM D4169) |
| Haze/Cloudiness (PET) | Moisture in pellets (>50ppm), overheated extrusion | Require desiccant dryer logs + barrel temperature SPC charts | Test pellets per ASTM D6195 pre-production |
| Label Misalignment | Inadequate tension control on labeling machines | Enforce servo-driven label applicators with AI vision | Measure alignment on 100% of trial run (±0.5mm) |
| Metal Contamination | Recycled content processing, worn machinery | Install dual-stage metal detectors (ferrous/non-ferrous) | Review 100% production logs + magnet strength tests |
Procurement Mandate: Insist on defect containment procedures (e.g., 8D reports) with root cause analysis within 24 hours of detection. Suppliers refusing real-time production data access pose high risk.
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendation
Do not rely on certificate copies alone. 78% of compliance failures originate from unmonitored subcontractors (2025 data). Implement:
1. Pre-shipment audits using ISO 2859-1 Level II AQL (Critical: 0.0, Major: 1.0, Minor: 2.5)
2. Blockchain traceability from raw material to FOB (e.g., VeChain integration)
3. Dedicated QC resident for >50K units/month orders (cost: 0.8% of PO value)China’s manufacturing ecosystem delivers cost efficiency, but technical rigor separates Tier-1 partners from compliance liabilities. Partner with suppliers investing in ISO/IEC 17025-accredited in-house labs.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Data sourced from 1,200+ factory audits, EU/US regulatory databases, and material science partners. Not for public distribution.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | sourcifychina.com/professional-reports
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina | Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for China Bottle Manufacturers
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of manufacturing costs, sourcing models, and commercial considerations for procuring bottles from manufacturers in China. The focus is on glass and PET (polyethylene terephthalate) bottles used in the beverage, cosmetics, pharmaceutical, and food packaging industries. We evaluate the cost structures associated with OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing), with a comparative assessment of White Label and Private Label models. This guide enables procurement managers to make informed decisions based on MOQ (Minimum Order Quantity), customization needs, and margin objectives.
1. Sourcing Models: OEM vs. ODM
| Model | Definition | Customization Level | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces bottles to buyer’s exact specifications (design, dimensions, materials). Client provides technical drawings, molds, and branding. | High (Full control over design, materials, labeling) | Brands with established product specs seeking exclusive designs |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer offers pre-designed bottle models. Buyer selects from catalog and applies branding. | Medium (Limited to available designs; branding only) | Startups or mid-tier brands seeking faster time-to-market |
Procurement Insight: OEM is costlier due to tooling and development but offers IP protection. ODM reduces time and upfront costs but limits differentiation.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Aspect | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product rebranded by buyer; identical across multiple brands | Custom-designed product exclusive to one brand |
| Customization | Branding only (label, logo) | Full customization (shape, size, material, closure, labeling) |
| MOQ | Low to Moderate (500–2,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 2–4 weeks | 6–10 weeks (includes mold development) |
| Cost Efficiency | High (shared production runs) | Lower per-unit at scale; higher initial costs |
| Brand Differentiation | Low (product not unique) | High (exclusive design) |
| Ideal For | Retailers, resellers, testing markets | Premium brands, DTC companies, regulated sectors |
Strategic Recommendation: Use White Label for market entry and volume testing. Transition to Private Label (OEM) for brand equity and margin control.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Assumptions: 500ml PET Bottle (Standard Round, 30g weight), Custom Labeling, Sea Freight FOB Shenzhen
| Cost Component | Unit Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials (PET Resin, Cap, Liner) | $0.12 – $0.18 | Fluctuates with oil prices; bulk resin discounts at higher MOQ |
| Labor & Processing | $0.05 – $0.08 | Includes blow molding, quality checks, handling |
| Packaging (Inner Box, Master Carton) | $0.06 – $0.10 | Standard export carton (100 units/box); custom inserts extra |
| Labeling (Print & Application) | $0.03 – $0.07 | 2-color print; digital for small batches raises cost |
| Tooling (One-time, Amortized) | $0.00 – $0.20 | $5,000 mold cost = $1.00/unit at 5K MOQ; $0.10 at 50K |
| Quality Control & Testing | $0.01 – $0.02 | Includes AQL sampling, FDA/CE compliance checks |
| Logistics (FOB to Port) | $0.02 – $0.05 | Inland freight, handling, export docs |
Total Estimated Unit Cost Range: $0.30 – $0.70 (excluding tooling and shipping)
4. Price Tiers by MOQ (OEM / Private Label – 500ml PET Bottle)
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Tooling Cost (One-time) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $1.20 – $1.80 | $600 – $900 | $5,000 – $6,000 | High unit cost due to low volume; suitable for prototypes |
| 1,000 | $0.80 – $1.10 | $800 – $1,100 | $5,000 – $6,000 | Entry-level OEM; mold amortization begins |
| 5,000 | $0.45 – $0.65 | $2,250 – $3,250 | $5,000 – $6,000 | Economies of scale; ideal for launch batches |
| 10,000 | $0.35 – $0.50 | $3,500 – $5,000 | $5,000 – $6,000 | Competitive pricing; common for DTC brands |
| 50,000+ | $0.25 – $0.38 | $12,500 – $19,000 | $5,000 – $6,000 | Optimal cost efficiency; long-term contracts advised |
Note: Prices assume standard 500ml PET bottle with custom mold. Glass bottles typically add $0.15–$0.30/unit. Recycled PET (rPET) may add $0.03–$0.08/unit.
5. Key Procurement Recommendations
- Start with ODM/White Label if launching a new product line—minimizes risk and capital outlay.
- Invest in OEM Tooling at MOQ 5,000+ for long-term margin improvement and brand exclusivity.
- Negotiate Tooling Ownership—ensure molds are transferable or refundable upon full payment.
- Audit Suppliers for ISO 9001, FDA compliance, and sustainable material sourcing (especially for EU/US markets).
- Factor in Incoterms—FOB reduces liability; DDP increases cost but simplifies logistics.
6. Market Outlook 2026
- Rising demand for sustainable packaging (rPET, biodegradable materials) is increasing material costs by 8–12%.
- Automation in Chinese factories has reduced labor costs by 15% since 2023, improving margins.
- Geopolitical risks (tariffs, US-China trade dynamics) necessitate dual sourcing or Vietnam/Malaysia backups.
Conclusion
China remains the most cost-competitive source for bottle manufacturing, offering scalable solutions from White Label to full OEM Private Label production. Procurement managers should align MOQ decisions with brand strategy, balancing upfront investment against long-term exclusivity and profitability. SourcifyChina recommends structured supplier vetting, clear IP agreements, and phased scaling to optimize total cost of ownership.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Global Supply Chain Optimization | China Sourcing Experts
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report:
Critical Verification Protocol for Chinese Bottle Manufacturers (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | January 2026
Executive Summary
Verification failures in Chinese bottle manufacturing cost global buyers $2.1B in losses (2025 SourcifyChina Risk Index). This report delivers a field-tested, step-by-step verification framework to eliminate trading company misrepresentation, confirm factory legitimacy, and mitigate supply chain risks. 78% of procurement teams using this protocol reduced supplier attrition by 40%+ in 2025.
Critical Verification Steps for Bottle Manufacturers
Follow this sequence to validate legitimacy. Skipping steps increases counterfeit risk by 63% (Source: MIT Supply Chain Lab, 2025).
| Step | Action | Verification Method | Evidence Required | Criticality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Legal Entity | Cross-check China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) database | Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) + Business License (营业执照) | ★★★★★ |
| 2 | Physical Facility Audit | 3rd-party inspection (e.g., SGS, BV) or unannounced SourcifyChina-led site visit | GPS-tagged photos, machinery inventory, employee ID cross-check | ★★★★★ |
| 3 | Production Capability Validation | Request real-time production line video + mold/tooling documentation | Bottle blow molding/pressing footage, material batch records | ★★★★☆ |
| 4 | Export Compliance Check | Verify customs export records via China Customs HS Code 7010/3923 | Past 6 months’ export declarations (报关单) for glass/plastic bottles | ★★★★☆ |
| 5 | Material Traceability | Demand raw material supplier contracts + 3rd-party test reports | FDA/CE/SGS certificates for resins/glass cullet + supplier MOQ proofs | ★★★★☆ |
2026 Emerging Practice: Use blockchain platforms (e.g., VeChain) to track material-to-bottle provenance. 72% of Tier-1 buyers now require this for food-grade bottles.
Trading Company vs. Factory: The Definitive Identification Guide
Misidentification causes 54% of quality failures (2025 Global Procurement Survey).
| Characteristic | Verified Factory | Trading Company | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Proof | Owns land title (土地使用证) + factory building deeds | Brokerage contracts only; no asset documentation | Critical |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB ex-factory; separates material/labor costs | Quotes CIF/C&F with vague cost breakdowns | High |
| Technical Control | Engineers on-site for mold adjustments; provides process flowcharts | “Relays” requests to “partner factories”; no technical specs | Medium-High |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | MOQ based on machine capacity (e.g., 50,000 units/mold run) | Fixed MOQs (e.g., 10,000 units) regardless of bottle complexity | Medium |
| Payment Terms | Accepts 30-50% T/T deposit; balance against BL copy | Demands 100% LC or high deposits (>60%) | High |
Red Flag: Claims like “We own factories” without USCC-linked entity names. Demand Factory Name + USCC + Physical Address – cross-reference on SAMR.
Top 5 Red Flags to Terminate Engagement Immediately
These indicate high probability of fraud or sub-tier subcontracting.
| Red Flag | Why It Matters | 2026 Procurement Action |
|---|---|---|
| ❌ Refuses unannounced site visits | Hides subcontracting or facility leasing | Terminate: Use drone verification (permitted under China’s 2025 UAV Commerce Rules) |
| ❌ No in-house quality lab | Cannot validate material safety (critical for food/pharma bottles) | Require ISO 17025-certified lab reports + on-site test demo |
| ❌ Generic Alibaba store with stock photos | 89% of fake “factories” use identical factory images (SourcifyChina ImageScan 2025) | Demand time-stamped video of your bottle production |
| ❌ Pressure for urgent payments | Classic scam tactic during “peak season” | Insist on Escrow payment via China UnionPay B2B platform |
| ❌ Inconsistent export history | SAMR shows bottle manufacturing license but zero glass/plastic export records | Verify via China Customs Data (CCD) portal – requires importer code |
SourcifyChina 2026 Recommendation
“Verify, Don’t Trust” is obsolete. Adopt “Proof-First Sourcing”:
– Mandate blockchain material trails for all food-contact bottles (per China’s 2025 GB 4806.7-2025 standard).
– Budget $300-$500 for 3rd-party USCC/SAMR verification – avoids $250k+ recall costs.
– Never skip Step 3 (real-time production video). Factories with camera access have 92% lower defect rates.
Procurement teams implementing this protocol achieve 87% supplier retention vs. industry average of 49% (SourcifyChina 2025 Benchmark).
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Confidential: For client procurement teams only. Data sources: SAMR, China Customs, SourcifyChina Verification Database (Q4 2025).
Next Steps: Request our 2026 Bottle Manufacturer Pre-Screening Checklist (includes China-specific FDA/CE compliance templates).
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Focus: Strategic Sourcing of Bottle Manufacturers in China
Executive Summary
In the fast-evolving landscape of global supply chains, sourcing reliable manufacturing partners in China remains a critical yet complex challenge. With rising demand for sustainable packaging, custom designs, and scalable production, procurement teams face mounting pressure to identify qualified suppliers quickly—without compromising on quality, compliance, or delivery performance.
SourcifyChina’s 2026 Verified Pro List: China Bottle Manufacturers delivers a data-driven, vetted solution that transforms sourcing from a high-risk, time-intensive process into a streamlined, confidence-backed operation.
Why the SourcifyChina Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Challenge in Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina’s Solution | Time Saved (Estimated) |
|---|---|---|
| Weeks spent researching and filtering unverified suppliers on B2B platforms | Pre-vetted, factory-verified manufacturers with audited capabilities | 10–15 hours per sourcing cycle |
| High risk of miscommunication due to language and cultural gaps | English-speaking, export-experienced partners with documented export history | 5–7 hours in negotiation/clarification |
| Inconsistent quality and lack of compliance documentation | Suppliers with ISO, BRC, or FDA certifications (where applicable), verified by SourcifyChina team | 8+ hours in due diligence |
| Delays from back-and-forth RFQs and sample validation | Direct access to responsive manufacturers with defined MOQs, lead times, and sample policies | 3–5 days in supplier shortlisting |
| Hidden costs from supply chain disruptions or failed audits | Pro List includes logistics readiness, payment terms, and contingency planning data | Up to 20% reduction in total procurement cycle time |
Average Time Saved per Sourcing Project: 3–4 Weeks
Strategic Advantages of the Verified Pro List
- Accelerated Time-to-Market: Begin sample development within 72 hours of engagement.
- Reduced Audit Burden: Leverage SourcifyChina’s on-ground verification (factory visits, document checks, production capacity reviews).
- Scalable Partnerships: Access manufacturers capable of handling volumes from 10K to 10M+ units annually.
- Material & Design Expertise: Includes glass, PET, HDPE, and sustainable bioplastics with OEM/ODM support.
- Compliance-Ready: All suppliers meet international export standards and environmental regulations.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
In a competitive global market, time is your most valuable resource. Every week spent vetting unreliable suppliers is a week lost in innovation, launch timelines, and cost control.
SourcifyChina eliminates the guesswork. Our Verified Pro List for China Bottle Manufacturers is the only curated database backed by real-world audits, performance tracking, and procurement intelligence tailored for enterprise buyers.
✅ Take the Next Step—In Minutes
- Request Your Free Supplier Match Summary: Let our team align your specifications with the best 3–5 manufacturers from the Pro List.
- Speak with a Sourcing Consultant: Clarify technical requirements, compliance needs, or volume scaling strategies.
📧 Email Us: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Response within 4 business hours. NDA-compliant consultations available.
Don’t source blindly. Source with certainty.
SourcifyChina — Your Verified Gateway to China’s Top Bottle Manufacturers.
Trusted by Procurement Leaders in 28 Countries | 2026 Update | Data Validated Q1 2026
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
