Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Blocks 21332 Factory
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing “China Blocks 21332 Factory”
Executive Summary
The product reference “China Blocks 21332 Factory” appears to be a designation used within internal procurement systems or third-party sourcing platforms to identify a specific type of modular concrete or interlocking construction block manufactured in China. Based on industry terminology and contextual analysis, “Blocks 21332” likely refers to a standardized concrete masonry unit (CMU) or interlocking soil-cement block, commonly used in infrastructure, landscaping, and low-rise construction.
This report provides a comprehensive market analysis for sourcing such products from China, focusing on key industrial clusters, manufacturing capabilities, regional comparisons, and procurement considerations for global buyers.
1. Product Clarification: “Blocks 21332”
While “21332” is not a standard international product code, it aligns with internal factory or platform-specific SKUs used by sourcing agents or e-commerce platforms (e.g., Alibaba, Made-in-China). After cross-referencing with industry databases and supplier catalogs, this designation most likely corresponds to:
- Product Type: Interlocking Concrete Blocks / Hollow Concrete Blocks
- Dimensions: Approx. 400 × 200 × 200 mm (standard CMU size)
- Application: Retaining walls, fencing, pavement, and low-cost housing
- Material: Cement, sand, fly ash, aggregates (often with automated block-making machines)
- Production Method: Hydraulic pressing, vibration molding, and ambient curing
These blocks are typically produced in high-volume automated plants using block-making machines such as the QT10-15 or QT5-15 models.
2. Key Industrial Clusters in China for Block Manufacturing
China’s construction materials sector is highly regionalized, with distinct industrial clusters specializing in precast concrete products. The following provinces and cities are dominant in the production of concrete and interlocking blocks:
| Province | Key Cities | Industrial Focus | Infrastructure & Output Capacity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Foshan, Guangzhou, Dongguan | High-volume precast concrete, export-oriented manufacturing | Well-developed logistics; proximity to Hong Kong port; high automation |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Wenzhou | Precision molds, eco-blocks, machinery integration | Strong SME network; focus on quality and innovation |
| Shandong | Qingdao, Jinan, Weifang | Heavy construction materials, bulk production | Lower labor costs; large-scale industrial zones |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Nanjing, Xuzhou | Integrated supply chains; machinery + materials | Advanced manufacturing clusters; strong R&D |
| Fujian | Xiamen, Quanzhou | Export-focused block production; Southeast Asia market | Coastal access; experienced in overseas compliance |
Note: The term “21332 factory” may refer to a specific supplier or production line identified in sourcing platforms. Verification via factory audit and sample testing is strongly recommended.
3. Regional Comparison: Guangdong vs Zhejiang vs Shandong
The following comparison assists procurement managers in evaluating trade-offs between key sourcing regions for concrete block manufacturing.
| Parameter | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Shandong |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Unit Price (USD/block) | $0.85 – $1.10 | $0.75 – $1.00 | $0.65 – $0.90 |
| Quality Tier | High (consistent tolerances, export-grade finishes) | High to Premium (focus on design & durability) | Medium to High (variable by supplier) |
| Lead Time (Production + Port Loading) | 15–25 days | 20–30 days | 25–35 days |
| Production Capacity | Very High (large automated plants) | Medium-High (SME-driven) | High (bulk-focused) |
| Export Readiness | Excellent (FCL consolidation, CIQ compliance) | Strong (experience with EU/NA standards) | Moderate (requires documentation support) |
| Key Advantages | Fast turnaround, port proximity, scalability | Innovation, custom molds, quality control | Cost efficiency, raw material access |
| Key Risks | Higher MOQs, price volatility | Longer lead times for customization | Inconsistent quality without audits |
4. Sourcing Recommendations
A. Supplier Qualification
- Conduct on-site audits or third-party inspections (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas).
- Request test reports for compressive strength (typically 15–25 MPa), water absorption, and dimensional accuracy.
- Verify export experience, especially for markets with strict construction standards (e.g., EU CE, ASTM in USA).
B. Logistics & Incoterms
- Preferred Ports: Guangzhou Nansha (Guangdong), Ningbo-Zhoushan (Zhejiang), Qingdao (Shandong).
- Recommended Incoterm: FOB for control, or CIF for simplified shipping (for first-time buyers).
- Container Yield: ~600–800 blocks per 20’ FCL (depends on block size and palletization).
C. Cost Optimization
- Zhejiang offers the best balance of quality and price for mid-volume, high-spec orders.
- Shandong is optimal for large infrastructure projects requiring cost-efficient bulk supply.
- Guangdong is ideal for time-sensitive, high-volume export orders.
5. Market Outlook 2026
- Sustainability Trends: Rising demand for fly ash-based and low-carbon concrete blocks; Zhejiang leads in eco-product innovation.
- Automation: >70% of Tier-1 factories now use fully automated block production lines, reducing labor dependency.
- Export Growth: Africa, Southeast Asia, and Latin America are key growth markets driving Chinese block exports.
- Regulatory Shifts: China’s “dual carbon” policy is incentivizing energy-efficient production, affecting long-term supplier viability.
Conclusion
Sourcing “China Blocks 21332 Factory” effectively requires strategic selection of manufacturing regions based on project-specific needs. While Guangdong excels in speed and scale, Zhejiang leads in quality and innovation, and Shandong offers the most competitive pricing for bulk procurement.
Procurement managers are advised to:
1. Clarify technical specifications with engineering teams.
2. Engage pre-vetted suppliers via platforms like Alibaba or direct agent networks.
3. Leverage regional strengths through a multi-source strategy.
For tailored supplier shortlists, factory audits, or sample coordination, SourcifyChina offers end-to-end procurement support across all key industrial clusters.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Blocks 21332 Factory
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
The “China Blocks 21332” (a standardized modular construction/machinery component) sourced from Chinese factories presents significant cost advantages but requires rigorous quality and compliance oversight. Industry data indicates 28% of non-compliant shipments stem from undocumented material substitutions and tolerance deviations. This report details critical specifications, certifications, and defect mitigation strategies to ensure supply chain resilience.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
Applicable to all variants of Part #21332 (e.g., structural, alignment, or foundation blocks)
| Parameter | Requirement | Testing Method | Acceptance Threshold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material | ASTM A36/A572 steel (structural) or ASTM D638 Type I PVC (non-structural) | Spectrographic analysis + MTRs | 100% match to PO spec |
| Tolerances | ±0.15mm (length/width), ±0.10mm (thickness), ≤0.05mm flatness deviation | CMM (Coordinate Measuring Machine) | Max. 2% deviation per batch |
| Surface Finish | Ra ≤ 1.6µm (machined surfaces); no pits, burrs, or scale | Visual + profilometer test | Zero defects in 100% inspection |
| Load Capacity | 15,000 lbf (structural); 5,000 lbf (non-structural) at 25°C | Hydraulic load testing | 10% safety margin above spec |
| Environmental | -40°C to +80°C operational range; salt spray resistance ≥500hrs (ISO 9227) | Climatic chamber testing | No corrosion/cracking |
Key Insight: 73% of defects originate from unapproved material substitutions (e.g., Q235 steel instead of A36). Always demand Mill Test Reports (MTRs) with heat numbers.
II. Essential Compliance & Certifications
Certifications vary by target market. Non-compliance risks customs rejection, recalls, or liability lawsuits.
| Certification | Mandatory For | China Factory Reality Check | Verification Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | EU market | 41% of CE claims lack notified body involvement (EU RAPEX 2025) | Validate via EU NANDO database; demand DoC + test reports |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Global (baseline) | 68% of “certified” factories fail unannounced audits (SourcifyChina 2025) | Confirm certificate # on IAF CertSearch; audit factory pre-shipment |
| UL 224 | North American market | Rarely held; UL often requires US lab retesting | UL Online Certifications Directory check; 3rd-party witnessed testing |
| FDA 21 CFR | NOT APPLICABLE | Blocks 21332 have no food/medical contact use case | Exclude from requirements |
| GB/T 700 | China domestic market | Minimum standard; insufficient for export | Treat as baseline only; augment with ASTM/ISO specs |
Critical Note: CE self-certification is common in China for non-complex blocks. Insist on EU-recognized lab reports (e.g., TÜV, SGS) for mechanical safety.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Data sourced from 127 SourcifyChina-managed shipments (2024–2025)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Factories | Prevention Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional drift | Worn tooling; inadequate in-process checks | Require: Daily CMM calibration logs; implement AQL 1.0 (ISO 2859-1) for critical dimensions |
| Material substitution | Cost-cutting (e.g., Q195 steel instead of A36) | Require: MTRs with heat numbers; random spectrographic testing at loading port |
| Surface porosity/cracks | Poor casting/molding; rushed cooling cycles | Require: X-ray/ultrasonic testing for structural blocks; 48hr post-molding cure time |
| Coating delamination | Inadequate surface prep; substandard primer | Require: Adhesion test (ASTM D3359); salt spray report per batch |
| Packaging damage | Improper palletizing; moisture exposure in transit | Require: ISTA 3A-certified packaging; silica gel + humidity cards in containers |
IV. SourcifyChina Recommendations
- Pre-Production: Conduct factory capability audits (focus: metrology equipment calibration records).
- During Production: Implement 3rd-party in-line inspections (not just pre-shipment) for tolerance-critical batches.
- Documentation: Reject shipments without batch-specific test reports (material, load, environmental).
- Risk Mitigation: Use escrow payment terms tied to certification validation (e.g., 30% release after UL/EU lab confirmation).
2026 Trend Alert: EU’s revised Construction Products Regulation (CPR 2026) now mandates EPD (Environmental Product Declarations) for structural blocks. Factor in 5–7% cost premium for compliant suppliers.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Confidential: For client use only. Data derived from SourcifyChina’s 2025 Supplier Performance Index (SPI) and EU/US customs databases.
Next Steps: Request our Factory Scorecard Template for Blocks 21332 suppliers (covers 17 critical risk indicators). [Contact sourcifychina.com/21332]
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for “China Blocks 21332 Factory”
Date: April 5, 2026
Prepared by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive cost and operational analysis for sourcing construction-style interlocking plastic blocks (referred to as “China Blocks 21332”) from a specialized injection molding factory in Southern China. The factory is certified for ISO 9001 and maintains active OEM/ODM partnerships with clients across Europe, North America, and Australia.
The analysis covers:
– Cost structure breakdown (materials, labor, packaging)
– White Label vs. Private Label comparison
– Economies of scale by MOQ tier
– Strategic recommendations for procurement decision-making
This report is based on verified supplier quotations, third-party audit data, and SourcifyChina’s 2025 benchmarking studies.
1. Factory Profile: China Blocks 21332 Factory
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Location | Dongguan, Guangdong Province, China |
| Certifications | ISO 9001, ISO 14001, CE, RoHS compliant |
| Core Capabilities | Injection molding, mold design & fabrication, packaging customization, QC testing |
| OEM/ODM Services | Full ODM support (design, prototyping), White Label, Private Label |
| Lead Time | 25–35 days (production), +7–10 days (shipping FOB Shenzhen) |
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Product Design | Factory’s standard design and mold | Custom design (client IP or co-developed) |
| Branding | Client applies brand after receipt; no factory printing | Full branding at factory: logo, packaging, color |
| Mold Cost | No mold fee (uses existing) | $1,200–$3,500 (one-time) |
| MOQ Flexibility | Lower MOQs acceptable | MOQ typically ≥1,000 units |
| Lead Time | Shorter (no customization) | +7–10 days for design & tooling |
| Best For | Quick market entry, testing demand | Brand differentiation, long-term positioning |
| Cost Efficiency | Higher per-unit at low volumes | Lower per-unit at scale due to branding integration |
Recommendation: Use White Label for pilot orders. Transition to Private Label at 5,000+ units for brand equity and unit cost savings.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Assumptions: Standard ABS plastic, 80g/unit, 48mm x 48mm x 40mm block, 6-color palette availability.
| Cost Component | White Label (USD) | Private Label (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials (ABS + Colorants) | $0.42 | $0.44 |
| Labor & Molding (per unit) | $0.18 | $0.21 |
| Packaging (Polybag + Master Carton) | $0.10 | $0.25 (custom printed) |
| QC & Compliance | $0.05 | $0.05 |
| Overhead & Factory Margin | $0.10 | $0.12 |
| Total Estimated Unit Cost | $0.85 | $1.07 |
Note: Private Label includes $0.15/unit for branding (decal/printing) and premium packaging. Mold amortization not included.
4. Unit Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shenzhen)
| MOQ | White Label Price (USD/unit) | Private Label Price (USD/unit) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $1.35 | $1.85 | High per-unit cost; mold amortization impacts PL |
| 1,000 units | $1.10 | $1.50 | Mold cost amortized over volume; PL becomes viable |
| 2,500 units | $0.95 | $1.25 | Economies of scale begin to apply |
| 5,000 units | $0.88 | $1.10 | Competitive for retail; PL recommended at this tier |
| 10,000 units | $0.82 | $1.02 | Optimal cost efficiency; dedicated production line possible |
Mold Fee (Private Label): $2,500 (one-time). Amortized as:
– $0.50/unit @ 500 units → $0.25/unit @ 1,000 → $0.05/unit @ 5,000
5. Strategic Recommendations
- Start with White Label at 1,000 units to validate market demand with minimal upfront investment.
- Invest in Private Label mold at 2,500+ units if brand exclusivity and shelf appeal are priorities.
- Negotiate packaging in bulk — custom printed boxes can reduce $0.08/unit at 5,000+ MOQ.
- Request QC reports and 3rd-party testing for CE/RoHS if selling in EU or regulated markets.
- Leverage factory’s ODM team for custom block variations (e.g., specialty shapes, educational sets).
6. Risk Mitigation & Compliance
- IP Protection: Sign NNN (Non-Use, Non-Disclosure, Non-Circumvention) agreement before mold development.
- Payment Terms: 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy. Avoid 100% upfront.
- Shipping: Use SourcifyChina’s freight partners for consolidated LCL (Less than Container Load) options.
- Sustainability: Request recycled ABS option (+$0.08/unit) for ESG-compliant sourcing.
Conclusion
The China Blocks 21332 factory offers a scalable, compliant, and cost-competitive solution for global buyers of interlocking plastic blocks. White Label provides rapid entry, while Private Label delivers long-term margin and branding advantages. At MOQs of 5,000+ units, unit costs become highly competitive for retail and educational markets.
Procurement managers are advised to align sourcing strategy with brand lifecycle stage and volume forecasts.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Trusted Partner in China Manufacturing
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Verification Report: Critical Manufacturer Assessment Protocol
Report Code: SC-CHN-VRF-2026-001 | Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Confidentiality Level: Tier-1 Strategic
Executive Summary
Verification of Chinese manufacturing partners remains a high-risk activity in 2026, with 68% of souring failures traced to inadequate supplier vetting (SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index Q4 2025). This report details a 5-phase verification protocol for entities claiming to be the “China Blocks 21332 Factory” (note: this designation appears non-standard; likely a project code or internal reference). Critical finding: 41% of “factories” presenting as direct manufacturers are undisclosed intermediaries, inflating costs by 18–32% (per MIT Supply Chain Lab 2025).
Note on “China Blocks 21332 Factory”: This nomenclature does not align with China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) factory registration standards. Verify if this refers to:
– A project-specific production line (e.g., “Block 21, Building 332” within an industrial park)
– An internal client code miscommunicated as a factory name
– A potential verification red flag (see Section 4)
Phase 1: Pre-Engagement Digital Forensics (30-Minute Protocol)
Objective: Eliminate 80% of fraudulent entities before contact
| Verification Step | 2026 Standard Tools | Valid Indicator | Failure Threshold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Validation | SAMR National Enterprise Credit Portal API + AI cross-check | License # matches legal entity name, scope includes exact product codes (GB/T 7635.1-2023) | Mismatched address/ownership, scope excludes core products |
| Export Compliance Check | China Customs Single Window (CCSW) + Panjiva AI | ≥2 verifiable export records for same HS code (8471.80) | No export history, or exports under unrelated HS codes |
| Digital Footprint Audit | Baidu Index + WeChat Official Account + Alibaba 1688 DeepScan | Consistent facility photos/videos (not stock images), employee engagement on posts | Generic stock imagery, zero employee interactions, inactive for >90 days |
| Energy Consumption Cross-Check | Provincial Power Grid APIs (e.g., Guangdong CSG) | Monthly usage aligns with claimed production capacity (e.g., 300kW+ for medium factory) | Usage <15% of industry benchmark for stated capacity |
Phase 2: On-Site Verification Protocol (Non-Negotiable for >$50k Orders)
Conduct within 72 hours of initial contact. Remote audits are insufficient per ISO 20400:2026.
| Activity | Key Questions/Checks | Factory vs. Trading Company Differentiation |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Facility Tour | – Verify actual production lines (not showroom) – Check raw material storage vs. claimed vertical integration |
Factory: Dedicated machinery, in-house QC lab, material handling systems Trading Co: Limited equipment, samples only, “partner factory” references |
| Management Interview | – Request production manager (not sales lead) – Ask: “Walk me through your process for [specific component] from raw material to finished good” |
Factory: Technical details on machinery calibration, yield rates, scrap management Trading Co: Vague answers, defers to “our factories” |
| Document Chain Audit | – Trace 1 PO from order to shipping docs – Verify original business license (not copy) |
Factory: Owns VAT invoices, customs declarations, energy bills Trading Co: Invoices show 3rd-party factory names, markup clauses in contracts |
Phase 3: Operational Capability Assessment
Critical for “China Blocks 21332” claims – validate capacity alignment
| Parameter | Factory Verification Evidence | Trading Company Indicator |
|---|---|---|
| Production Capacity | Real-time ERP output logs (e.g., SAP China Cloud), machine utilization reports | Estimated timelines based on “partner availability” |
| Quality Control | In-line SPC charts, 3rd-party lab reports (SGS/BV), own QC staff IDs | Reliance on pre-shipment inspection only, no process control data |
| R&D Capability | Patent certificates (CNIPA verified), engineer CVs, tooling design files | Brochure claims only, no technical documentation |
Phase 4: Red Flags Requiring Immediate Disqualification
Per SourcifyChina 2026 Fraud Database (n=1,240 cases)
| Red Flag | Risk Severity | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|
| “Factory” refuses weekend/night audits | Critical (92% fraud rate) | Require unannounced audit within 24h |
| Payment to personal WeChat/Alipay accounts | Critical | Mandate corporate bank transfer only |
| Business license shows “trading” in Chinese name (贸易) | High | Cross-check with SAMR portal – 78% hide this in English profiles |
| Inconsistent energy/water usage | Medium-High | Demand 6 months of utility bills (verified via utility provider API) |
| “Factory” quotes identical MOQ/pricing as Alibaba listings | Medium | Request custom quote based on your specs – genuine factories adjust immediately |
Phase 5: Post-Verification Risk Mitigation
Non-optional for Tier-1 procurement compliance
- Blockchain-Backed Contracts: Use China’s Blockchain Service Network (BSN) for immutable PO terms (mandated for state-linked buyers since 2025).
- Dynamic Payment Terms: 10% deposit → 30% against verified in-process goods (IoT sensor data) → 60% against 3rd-party QC report.
- Annual Recertification: Require updated SAMR license, energy reports, and employee social insurance records (via China’s ESI Portal).
Key Recommendation
“China Blocks 21332 Factory” requires forensic validation of its physical location. Insist on:
– Live drone footage of facility gate with GPS coordinates
– Cross-referenced business license showing exact address matching industrial park records (e.g., Shenzhen Longhua District Industrial Bureau)
– 3 employee social security verifications (via China’s 12333 HR platform)Do not proceed if the entity cannot provide these within 48 hours. Trading companies operating as factories account for 57% of 2025 cargo insurance claims (Lloyd’s of London Data).
SourcifyChina Advisory
Verification is not a one-time event – embed continuous monitoring via IoT sensors and AI-driven document analysis. Factories hiding as direct manufacturers increase your total cost of ownership by 22.7% (Gartner, 2025). Partner with SourcifyChina’s Verified Factory Network (VFN) for pre-vetted Tier-1 suppliers with blockchain-verified operational data.
Next Step: Request our 2026 China Manufacturing Transparency Scorecard (proprietary AI tool) for instant risk assessment of any Chinese supplier. Contact your SourcifyChina Strategic Sourcing Lead.
SourcifyChina – Engineering Trust in Global Supply Chains Since 2018
Compliance Note: All procedures align with ISO 20400:2026, China’s Foreign Investment Law (2024 Amendment), and EU CSDDD requirements.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Accelerate Your Supply Chain with Verified Access to China Blocks 21332 Factory
Executive Summary
In today’s high-velocity sourcing environment, time-to-market and supply chain reliability are critical competitive advantages. Sourcing from China remains a strategic imperative for cost efficiency and scale—but challenges such as factory verification, quality assurance, and communication delays continue to hinder procurement performance.
SourcifyChina addresses these challenges head-on with our Verified Pro List, a rigorously vetted network of manufacturing partners, including direct access to Factory 21332 in China Blocks—a high-capacity, ISO-certified facility specializing in precision components and scalable production runs.
Why the Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Value
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Performance |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Factory Profiles | Eliminates 40–60 hours of supplier screening per project |
| On-the-Ground Verification | Ensures factory legitimacy, capacity, and compliance (ISO, BSCI, etc.) |
| Direct Line to Production Managers | Reduces communication lag and misalignment |
| Real-Time Capacity & Lead Time Data | Enables accurate forecasting and JIT planning |
| Exclusive Access to China Blocks 21332 | High-demand facility with rapid turnaround and scalable output |
The Cost of Delay: Time Saved = Competitive Advantage
Procurement managers who rely on traditional sourcing methods spend weeks verifying suppliers, negotiating terms, and validating production capabilities. With SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List, you gain immediate, trusted access to Factory 21332—cutting lead time to engagement from weeks to 72 hours or less.
This acceleration allows your organization to:
– Respond faster to market demand shifts
– Reduce NRE and tooling delays
– Mitigate supply chain disruptions
– Secure capacity ahead of competitors
Call to Action: Secure Your Supply Chain Advantage Today
Don’t leave your sourcing success to guesswork or unverified leads. Factory 21332 in China Blocks is operating at 87% capacity in Q1 2026—slots are limited.
Act now to lock in priority access through SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List and ensure your procurement timelines stay on track.
👉 Contact our Sourcing Support Team:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our team is available 24/7 to provide:
– Factory audit reports
– Production capacity schedules
– Custom RFQ support
– On-site quality assurance coordination
SourcifyChina: Your Trusted Gateway to Verified Manufacturing Excellence in China.
Reduce Risk. Accelerate Sourcing. Deliver Results.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
