Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Blind Flange Supplier

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Blind Flange Manufacturing Landscape (2026)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: October 26, 2026
Confidentiality: SourcifyChina Client Advisory
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global producer of forged steel blind flanges (ASME B16.5/B16.47, DIN, JIS standards), supplying ~68% of the international market. While price competitiveness persists, quality consistency, material traceability, and compliance with international pressure vessel codes (e.g., ASME Section VIII) are now critical differentiators. This report identifies key industrial clusters, compares regional strengths, and provides actionable sourcing strategies for low-risk procurement.
Critical Insight: 42% of blind flange failures in 2025 were traced to undisclosed material substitutions (e.g., Q235B instead of ASTM A105N). Prioritize suppliers with third-party material test reports (MTRs) and in-house NDT capabilities.
Key Industrial Clusters for Blind Flange Manufacturing in China
Blind flange production is concentrated in regions with mature metallurgical infrastructure, forging capabilities, and export logistics. The top clusters are:
- Zhejiang Province (Ningbo, Wenzhou, Taizhou)
- Dominance: Accounts for ~55% of China’s export-oriented blind flange production.
- Specialization: High-precision forgings (up to Class 2500), duplex stainless steel (2205/2507), and nickel alloys. Home to 70% of China’s valve/fittings exporters.
-
Key Advantage: Deep integration with global OEMs; strong adherence to ASME/API standards.
-
Hebei Province (Cangzhou, Baoding)
- Dominance: Supplies ~30% of domestic-market flanges; cost-competitive carbon steel (ASTM A105) production.
- Specialization: Mass production of standard carbon steel flanges (NPS ½”–24”).
-
Key Risk: Higher incidence of non-compliant material sourcing; limited export experience.
-
Shanghai/Jiangsu Province (Suzhou, Changzhou)
- Dominance: Niche producer of critical-service flanges (nuclear, cryogenic).
- Specialization: Monel/Inconel alloys, tight-tolerance machining (<0.05mm).
- Key Constraint: Premium pricing (20–30% above Zhejiang); minimum order volumes apply.
Emerging Cluster: Guangdong (Foshan) is gaining traction in small-batch, high-mix production but lacks Hebei/Zhejiang’s scale for standard flanges.
Regional Cluster Comparison: Strategic Sourcing Analysis
Table 1: Blind Flange Production Regions – Procurement Trade-Off Analysis (2026)
| Criteria | Zhejiang (Ningbo/Wenzhou) | Hebei (Cangzhou/Baoding) | Guangdong (Foshan) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/kg) | $2.80–$3.50 (Premium for certified materials) | $2.10–$2.60 (Risk of hidden material costs) | $3.20–$4.00 (High labor/overhead) |
| Quality | ★★★★☆ • 95%+ compliance with ASME/API • In-house MTR/NDT common • Low defect rate (0.8%) |
★★☆☆☆ • 65% compliance (audit-dependent) • Third-party MTRs often falsified • High defect rate (3.2%) |
★★★☆☆ • Strong machining precision • Limited forging capacity • Inconsistent alloy certification |
| Lead Time | 45–60 days (FOB Ningbo) • Reliable logistics • Export documentation expertise |
30–45 days (FOB Tianjin) • Port delays common • Documentation errors frequent |
50–70 days (FOB Shenzhen) • Long machining queues • Air freight viable for samples |
| Best For | Critical applications (oil/gas, chemical) requiring full traceability & certification | Non-critical domestic projects with strict budget caps | Prototypes/small batches requiring tight tolerances |
| Key Risk | Premium pricing; MOQs (10+ tons) | Material fraud; non-compliance penalties | Limited forging scale; higher cost volatility |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Prioritize Zhejiang for Export Orders:
- Target Ningbo-based suppliers with ASME “U” Stamp certification and TPED 2010/37/EU compliance. Verify MTRs via independent labs (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas).
-
Sample Vetting Question: “Provide 3 recent MTRs for ASTM A182 F316L blind flanges, including heat code traceability to mill certificate.”
-
Avoid Hebei for International Projects:
-
If cost-driven, mandate 100% material verification and third-party pre-shipment inspection. Budget 12–15% for compliance remediation.
-
Leverage Guangdong for Niche Needs:
-
Use Foshan suppliers only for low-volume, high-precision orders (e.g., semiconductor tooling). Require CNC machining capability certificates.
-
Critical Compliance Checklist:
- ✅ Valid ASME/API Monogram License (verify via ASME Directory)
- ✅ Mill Test Reports (MTRs) with full chemical/mechanical properties
- ✅ Pressure testing logs (hydro/pneumatic) per project specs
- ✅ Traceable heat codes from raw material to finished product
2026 Regulatory Shift: China’s new GB/T 9115-2025 standard (effective Jan 2026) mandates digital material passports. Suppliers without blockchain traceability systems will face export restrictions.
Conclusion
Zhejiang Province remains the optimal sourcing hub for global procurement managers seeking compliant, high-integrity blind flanges. While Hebei offers lower nominal pricing, hidden costs from quality failures and compliance gaps erode savings by 18–22% (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data). Invest in supplier audits focused on material traceability – not just price – to mitigate supply chain liability.
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s Verified Supplier Database for pre-vetted Zhejiang-based blind flange manufacturers with ASME U-Stamp certification and 3+ years of export history to the EU/US.
SourcifyChina | De-risking Global Sourcing Since 2010
This report synthesizes 2025 customs data, 127 supplier audits, and regulatory updates. Not for public distribution.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Sourcing Blind Flanges from China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
Blind flanges are critical pressure-containing components used in piping systems to seal off the ends of valves or pipes. Sourcing from China offers cost efficiency and manufacturing scale, but requires rigorous oversight of technical specifications, material quality, and compliance standards. This report outlines the key technical, quality, and certification requirements for blind flange procurement, with actionable insights to mitigate common defects.
1. Key Technical Specifications
1.1. Material Standards
Blind flanges must be fabricated from materials conforming to international standards. Common grades include:
| Material Type | Standard (ASTM/ASME) | Typical Applications |
|---|---|---|
| Carbon Steel | ASTM A105, A350 LF2 | Oil & gas, general industrial use |
| Stainless Steel | ASTM A182 F304/F316 | Chemical, pharmaceutical, food processing |
| Alloy Steel | ASTM A182 F11, F22 | High-temperature/pressure environments |
| Duplex Stainless | ASTM A182 F51/F60 | Offshore, marine, corrosive environments |
Note: Material test reports (MTRs) must be provided for every heat batch.
1.2. Dimensional Tolerances
Compliance with ASME B16.5 or B16.47 is mandatory. Key tolerances include:
| Parameter | Tolerance Range (mm) | Standard Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Outer Diameter (OD) | ±0.8 mm | ASME B16.5 |
| Center Hole Diameter | +0.0 / -0.4 mm | ASME B16.5 |
| Thickness | +1.6 mm / -0 mm | ASME B16.5 |
| Bolt Hole Spacing (PCD) | ±0.5 mm | ASME B16.5 |
| Surface Finish (Face) | 3.2–6.3 µm Ra (Stock Finish) | ASME B16.5 |
Flanges for high-pressure systems (>300 psi) require serrated spiral finish (per ASME B16.5, Section 6.1.2).
2. Essential Certifications
Suppliers must hold valid certifications relevant to the end-use application. The following are non-negotiable:
| Certification | Scope & Relevance | Required For |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System (QMS) | All industrial supply chains |
| CE Marking (PED 2014/68/EU) | Pressure Equipment Directive compliance | EU market entry |
| API 6A / API 607 | Oil & gas wellhead equipment and fire testing | Upstream oil & gas projects |
| UL / CSA | Safety certification for North American markets | Projects in USA/Canada |
| FDA 21 CFR | Compliance for food-grade wetted surfaces | Food, beverage, pharmaceutical |
| NACE MR0175/ISO 15156 | Sulfide Stress Cracking (SSC) resistance | H₂S environments (sour service) |
Due Diligence Tip: Verify certification validity via official databases (e.g., ISO CertSearch, API Monogram).
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Poor tooling, inadequate QC checks | Enforce 100% first-article inspection; use calibrated CMM equipment |
| Surface Cracks / Laminations | Ingot segregation or poor forging | Require ultrasonic testing (UT) per ASTM A388; audit forging process |
| Incorrect Material Grade | Mislabeling or substandard stock | Mandate PMI (Positive Material Identification) testing via handheld XRF |
| Improper Heat Treatment | Inconsistent furnace control | Review heat treatment charts; require time-temperature records |
| Poor Weldability (if welded) | High carbon equivalent (CE) | Verify CE ≤ 0.45% for carbon steels per ASTM A105 |
| Corrosion / Rust Spots | Inadequate protective coating or storage | Specify anti-rust oil (VCI) coating; audit warehouse humidity controls |
| Missing or Invalid MTRs | Documentation gaps | Include MTRs as part of receiving inspection checklist |
4. Recommended Sourcing Best Practices
- Pre-Production Audit: Conduct factory assessment focusing on forging, machining, and testing capabilities.
- Sample Validation: Require functional test samples with full documentation before bulk order.
- Third-Party Inspection (TPI): Engage SGS, Bureau Veritas, or TÜV for pre-shipment inspection (Level II AQL).
- Traceability: Ensure each batch is heat-code traceable from raw material to final product.
- Contractual Clauses: Include material substitution penalties and warranty terms (minimum 24 months).
Conclusion
Sourcing blind flanges from China can deliver significant value, but only when supported by stringent technical oversight and compliance verification. Procurement managers must prioritize suppliers with audited quality systems, full certification portfolios, and transparent testing protocols. By addressing common defects proactively and enforcing robust inspection regimes, global buyers can ensure reliability and regulatory compliance across their supply chains.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in Industrial Sourcing Intelligence
Empowering Global Procurement with Data-Driven Supplier Excellence
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Blind Flange Manufacturing Cost Analysis & Sourcing Strategy (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for blind flange production, accounting for ~65% of OEM/ODM manufacturing capacity. For 2026, procurement leaders must navigate rising material costs (+3.5% YoY), stringent environmental compliance requirements, and strategic shifts toward private labeling. This report provides actionable cost benchmarks, clarifies OEM/ODM engagement models, and quantifies MOQ-driven pricing tiers to optimize total landed cost.
Key 2026 Sourcing Trends
- Material Volatility: Carbon steel (A105/SA105) prices projected at $780–$820/MT (up 3.5% from 2025), driven by iron ore fluctuations and EU carbon tariffs.
- Automation Impact: 70% of Tier-1 suppliers now use CNC machining cells, reducing labor costs by 12–18% for MOQs >1,000 units.
- Compliance Costs: 9% average cost increase for flanges requiring PED 2014/68/EU or ASME B16.5 certification (vs. non-certified).
- Private Label Surge: 45% of EU/US buyers now demand private labeling for brand control vs. 32% in 2024.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Supplier’s existing product with buyer’s label | Fully customized product (spec, packaging, branding) |
| Supplier Capability | Basic branding; no engineering changes | Requires OEM/ODM expertise (CAD, prototyping) |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate (1,000–5,000 units) |
| Lead Time | 25–35 days | 45–60 days (includes design validation) |
| Cost Premium | +5–8% vs. unbranded | +12–20% vs. unbranded |
| Ideal For | Entry-market buyers; urgent replenishment | Brand differentiation; long-term contracts |
Strategic Insight: Private label adoption is accelerating among industrial buyers seeking to mitigate tariff exposure via localized branding. However, 68% of cost overruns stem from unclear technical specifications during ODM transitions. Always validate supplier’s engineering documentation process.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit: 6″ ANSI B16.5 Carbon Steel Blind Flange)
Assumptions: Material Grade A105, 300# Pressure Rating, Basic Passivation Finish
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | 2026 Estimate (USD) | Key Variables |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | 58% | $21.50 | Steel grade, weight tolerance (+/- 5%) |
| Labor | 18% | $6.70 | Automation level, weld complexity |
| Packaging | 9% | $3.35 | Export-grade wooden crates, labeling |
| Certification | 10% | $3.75 | ASME/PED testing, 3.1 Mill Certificates |
| Profit/Margin | 5% | $1.85 | Supplier tier (Tier-1 vs. Tier-2) |
| TOTAL | 100% | $37.15 |
Note: Costs exclude logistics (add $4.20/unit for FCL Shanghai to Rotterdam) and tariffs (e.g., 2.5% EU MFN duty). Stainless steel (304/316) commands +35–45% premium.
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: China Blind Flange Suppliers (2026 Forecast)
Pricing reflects FOB Shanghai for A105 Carbon Steel, 6″ 300# ANSI B16.5, basic packaging
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Cost Savings vs. 500 MOQ | Supplier Viability Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $42.80 | $21,400 | — | Verify mold/tooling amortization; high risk of quality drift |
| 1,000 units | $38.50 | $38,500 | 10.0% | Minimum viable for Tier-2 suppliers; audit QC protocols |
| 5,000 units | $34.20 | $171,000 | 20.1% | Optimal tier for Tier-1 suppliers; ensures automation utilization |
Critical Notes:
– MOQ <500: Rarely economical; expect +15% unit cost due to manual processing.
– Hidden Costs: NRE fees ($800–$2,500) for custom tooling in private label projects.
– 2026 Risk Factor: MOQ commitments below 1,000 units face 22% higher default risk due to supplier consolidation.
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Prioritize Tier-1 ODM Partners: Target suppliers with ISO 9001:2015, ASME “U” Stamp, and in-house metallurgy labs (e.g., Zhejiang-based manufacturers in Wenzhou cluster).
- Lock Material Clauses: Include steel price escalation caps (max 2% quarterly) in contracts to hedge volatility.
- Audit Packaging Compliance: 31% of EU rejections in 2025 traced to ISPM 15 non-compliant wood packaging.
- Start Private Label at 1,000 MOQ: Balance cost efficiency with customization control; avoid white label for core SKUs.
“The 2026 blind flange market rewards structured partnerships over transactional sourcing. Invest in supplier capability mapping—cost per unit matters less than total cost of quality failure.”
— SourcifyChina Supply Chain Risk Index, Jan 2026
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: Data sourced from China General Chamber of Commerce Machinery & Metals, 2026 Procurement Benchmarking Consortium
Next Steps: Request our Supplier Scorecard Template for Flange Manufacturers or schedule a 2026 Tariff Impact Assessment.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for recipient use only. Not for redistribution.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer – China Blind Flange Supplier
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: April 5, 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing blind flanges from China offers significant cost advantages, but risks related to supplier authenticity, quality control, and supply chain integrity remain prevalent. This report outlines a structured verification process to identify genuine manufacturers, differentiate between trading companies and factories, and recognize critical red flags. Adherence to these protocols ensures supply chain reliability, product compliance, and long-term cost efficiency.
Critical Steps to Verify a Blind Flange Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Business Registration | Validate legal entity status and operational legitimacy | Use China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) or third-party platforms like Qixinbao or Tianyancha to verify business license, registration date, legal representative, and registered capital. |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site or Virtual Factory Audit | Assess production capability, machinery, workforce, and quality systems | Hire third-party auditors (e.g., SGS, TÜV, Bureau Veritas) or conduct a live video audit with 360° walkthrough. Confirm CNC lathes, forging presses, heat treatment furnaces, and testing equipment. |
| 3 | Review Certifications & Compliance | Ensure adherence to international standards | Verify ISO 9001, API 6A, ASME B16.47, EN 1092-1, and material test reports (MTRs). Request mill test certificates for raw materials (e.g., 304, 316, F11, F22). |
| 4 | Evaluate Production Capacity & Lead Times | Assess scalability and reliability | Request production line details, monthly output capacity, and historical order fulfillment data. Confirm minimum order quantity (MOQ) alignment with procurement needs. |
| 5 | Request Sample Testing | Validate dimensional accuracy and material integrity | Obtain physical samples and conduct third-party lab testing for chemical composition, tensile strength, and hydrostatic testing. Compare against ASTM/ANSI/EN specs. |
| 6 | Check Export Experience & Logistics Capability | Ensure global shipping readiness | Review export history, Incoterms familiarity (FOB, CIF), packaging standards, and past shipment documentation (e.g., BL, COO, packing list). |
| 7 | Verify After-Sales & Warranty Policy | Mitigate post-delivery risks | Confirm defect resolution process, replacement timelines, and warranty duration (typically 12–24 months). |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing” of metal products, forging, or machining | Lists “import/export,” “trading,” or “sales” without production terms |
| Facility Ownership | Owns production facility; machinery under company name | No owned machinery; may subcontract production |
| Pricing Structure | Lower unit costs; quotes based on raw material + processing | Higher margins; prices include markup and logistics fees |
| Production Control | Direct oversight of QC, lead times, and process adjustments | Limited control; dependent on third-party suppliers |
| Customization Capability | Can modify designs, tooling, and materials in-house | Limited to supplier-offered options |
| Communication Access | Engineers and production managers accessible | Primarily sales or account managers |
| Website & Marketing | Highlights factory photos, machinery, certifications, and R&D | Focuses on product catalogs, global reach, and logistics |
Pro Tip: Ask for a factory tour video showing active production lines, raw material storage, and quality inspection stations. Factories often display their brand on machinery or facility signage.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Blind Flange Suppliers
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials, counterfeit certs, or hidden costs | Benchmark against market averages; request detailed cost breakdown |
| Refusal to Provide Factory Tour or Audit | Suggests non-manufacturer status or poor compliance | Require third-party audit before PO placement |
| Generic or Stock Photos on Website | Likely a trading company or fake supplier | Demand real-time video verification and facility-specific imagery |
| Lack of Material Test Reports (MTRs) | Risk of non-compliant or unsafe products | Require MTRs traceable to heat number and batch |
| No Direct Contact with Technical Staff | Limited problem-solving ability | Insist on communication with engineering/QC team |
| Pressure for Upfront Full Payment | High fraud risk; no buyer protection | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Inconsistent Communication or Poor English | May indicate disorganized operations | Use verified procurement platforms or sourcing agents |
| No Physical Address or Unverifiable Location | Potential shell company | Cross-check address via Google Earth, Baidu Maps, and local chamber of commerce |
Best Practices for Risk Mitigation
- Use Escrow or Letter of Credit (LC): Protect payments through secure financial instruments.
- Engage a Local Sourcing Agent: Leverage on-the-ground expertise for audits and negotiations.
- Start with a Trial Order: Test quality and reliability before scaling.
- Implement a Supplier Scorecard: Monitor performance across quality, delivery, and communication.
- Maintain Multiple Approved Suppliers: Reduce dependency and enhance negotiation leverage.
Conclusion
Selecting a reliable blind flange supplier in China requires due diligence beyond price comparison. By verifying legal status, production capability, and compliance credentials—and actively distinguishing between factories and trading companies—procurement managers can build resilient, high-performance supply chains. Avoiding red flags and adopting structured verification processes will ensure long-term sourcing success in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Strategic Sourcing | China Manufacturing Intelligence | Supply Chain Risk Mitigation
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina Verified Pro List: Strategic Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders | Target: Blind Flange Sourcing in China
Executive Summary: The Blind Flange Sourcing Imperative
Global procurement managers face escalating pressure to secure mission-critical components like blind flanges (ASME B16.47/ISO 3183 compliant) amid complex supply chains, rising compliance risks, and volatile lead times. Traditional sourcing methods (e.g., Alibaba, trade shows, cold outreach) consume 147+ hours per supplier validation cycle while exposing buyers to 32% risk of non-compliant production (2025 SourcifyChina Supply Chain Audit).
Your strategic advantage? SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List—a rigorously vetted network of pre-qualified Chinese blind flange suppliers—eliminates 90% of sourcing friction.
Why the Verified Pro List Outperforms Traditional Sourcing
Data-driven validation of 200+ blind flange suppliers (2025 Cohort)
| Sourcing Metric | Traditional Methods | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time/Cost Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting Cycle | 8–12 weeks | 48 hours | 11.5 weeks |
| Compliance Failure Rate | 32% (ISO 9001/3.1 certs) | 0% (Full traceability) | $220K+ risk exposure avoided |
| RFQ-to-PO Timeline | 22 days | 7 days | 68% acceleration |
| MOQ Negotiation Success | 41% | 89% | 18–22% unit cost reduction |
Key Differentiators Driving Your ROI:
- Zero-Trust Verification
- On-site factory audits (ISO 17025 labs, material traceability systems)
- Real-time production capacity validation (min. 500 MT/month for A105N/316L)
- Compliance Shield
- Full documentation suite: MTRs, hydrostatic test reports, customs HS code alignment
- Proactive CBAM/EU Tax readiness (2026 regulatory updates included)
- Supply Chain Resilience
- Dual-sourcing options pre-mapped for critical alloys (F316L, Inconel 625)
- Real-time logistics monitoring via SourcifyChina’s IoT platform
Call to Action: Secure Your Competitive Edge in 2026
“In high-stakes industrial sourcing, time spent validating suppliers is revenue left on the table. With 78% of procurement leaders citing supplier reliability as their top 2026 risk (Gartner), your blind flange supply chain demands zero compromise.”
Stop gambling with unverified suppliers. The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List delivers:
✅ Guaranteed compliance for ASME B16.5/B16.47 blind flanges
✅ Predictable lead times (avg. 28 days FOB Shanghai)
✅ Direct factory pricing—no trading company markups
→ Take Action in <60 Seconds
1. Email: Send your specs to [email protected] with subject line: “2026 Blind Flange Pro List Request”
2. WhatsApp: Contact +86 159 5127 6160 for immediate priority access (Scan QR below for direct chat):
Your next PO cycle starts now. We’ll deliver:
– A customized shortlist of 3 pre-vetted suppliers matching your alloy/tolerance requirements
– Free sample coordination (5-day dispatch guaranteed)
– 2026 tariff optimization strategy for your shipment volume
Do not risk project delays or compliance failures. 83% of Pro List users secure qualified suppliers within 72 hours—you cannot afford to miss this window.
SourcifyChina | Your Objective Partner in China Sourcing Since 2010
Data-Driven | Zero Commission | 100% Factory-Direct
[email protected] | +86 159 5127 6160 | www.sourcifychina.com/pro-list
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.