Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Blender Factory

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026

Strategic Market Analysis: Sourcing Blender Manufacturers from China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers – Q2 2026

---

Executive Summary

China remains the dominant global hub for small kitchen appliance (SKA) manufacturing, with blenders representing a high-volume, competitive segment. Over 70% of the world’s household blenders are produced in China, driven by mature supply chains, skilled labor, and concentrated industrial ecosystems. This report identifies and analyzes the key industrial clusters for blender manufacturing, evaluates regional strengths, and provides a data-driven comparison to support strategic sourcing decisions.

For procurement managers, understanding regional differentials in pricing, quality, and lead time is critical to balancing cost-efficiency with product reliability and compliance. The primary manufacturing hubs are located in Guangdong and Zhejiang provinces, with emerging capacity in Fujian and Jiangsu.

---

Key Industrial Clusters for Blender Manufacturing in China

Blender production in China is highly regionalized, with manufacturing clusters offering specialized capabilities based on local industrial ecosystems, component availability, and export infrastructure.

1. Guangdong Province (Dominant Hub)

• Core Cities: Shunde (Foshan), Zhongshan, Dongguan, Shenzhen
• Overview: Guangdong is China’s largest small appliance manufacturing base. Shunde District alone accounts for over 40% of national blender output and hosts thousands of OEM/ODM factories.
• Strengths:
• Full vertical integration (motors, plastic injection, PCBs, packaging)
• Proximity to Shenzhen’s electronics supply chain
• High export readiness and compliance experience (FDA, CE, UL, RoHS)
• Strong R&D and design capabilities for premium brands

2. Zhejiang Province (Cost-Competitive Alternative)

• Core Cities: Ningbo, Hangzhou, Yuyao, Wenzhou
• Overview: Known for cost-effective manufacturing and strong mold-making expertise. Increasingly competitive in mid-tier blenders.
• Strengths:
• Lower labor and operational costs than Guangdong
• High precision in plastic and metal component production
• Strong logistics via Ningbo-Zhoushan Port (world’s busiest container port)
• Growing focus on automation to improve consistency

3. Fujian Province (Emerging Niche Player)

• Core City: Xiamen
• Overview: Smaller-scale production with growing investment in home appliance clusters. Focus on budget and export-oriented OEMs.
• Strengths:
• Lower land and labor costs
• Government incentives for export manufacturing
• Increasing quality control standards
• Limitations: Less mature supply chain; longer lead times for component sourcing

4. Jiangsu Province (Premium & Smart Appliance Focus)

• Core Cities: Suzhou, Wuxi
• Overview: High-tech manufacturing base with focus on smart appliances and IoT integration.
• Strengths:
• Advanced automation and Industry 4.0 adoption
• Strong integration with German and Japanese engineering partners
• Preferred for premium or smart blender models
• Limitations: Higher costs; less suited for low-margin volume production

---

Regional Comparison: Blender Manufacturing Hubs (2026 Benchmark)

Region	Average Unit Price (USD)	Quality Tier	Lead Time (Production + Export)	Key Advantages	Key Risks
Guangdong	$8.50 – $15.00	High to Premium	35–45 days	Full supply chain, proven compliance, design expertise, export-ready	Higher labor costs, capacity constraints during peak season
Zhejiang	$6.20 – $10.50	Mid to High	40–50 days	Competitive pricing, strong mold/component base, efficient logistics	Slightly lower design innovation vs. Guangdong
Fujian	$5.00 – $8.00	Low to Mid	50–60 days	Lowest cost, government incentives	Less mature QC systems, supply chain delays
Jiangsu	$12.00 – $20.00	Premium	45–55 days	High automation, smart tech integration, German/Japanese standards	Highest cost, not ideal for budget models

Note: Prices based on 10,000-unit MOQ, 1.5L plastic-body blender with 800W motor, standard packaging. Ex-works (EXW) or FOB Shenzhen/Ningbo.

---

Strategic Sourcing Recommendations

1. For Premium Brands & High Compliance Needs:
   → Prioritize Guangdong, especially Shunde-based manufacturers with UL/CE certifications and in-house R&D.

2. For Mid-Tier Volume Procurement (Cost-Quality Balance):
   → Evaluate Zhejiang suppliers, particularly in Ningbo and Yuyao, for reliable quality at competitive pricing.

3. For Budget Lines or Private Label Entry:
   → Consider Fujian with enhanced QC audits. Ideal for emerging markets with lower price sensitivity.

4. For Smart/IoT-Enabled Blenders:
   → Explore Jiangsu partners with experience in app integration, touch controls, and premium materials.

---

Risk Mitigation & Best Practices

• Audit Factories In-Person or via 3rd Party: Use SGS, TÜV, or SourcifyChina’s vetting protocol.
• Verify Compliance Certifications: Ensure factories have active UL, CE, or ETL listings.
• Secure IP Protection: Execute NDAs and register designs via China IP Office.
• Diversify Supplier Base: Avoid over-reliance on a single region to mitigate disruption risks.

---

Conclusion

Guangdong remains the gold standard for blender manufacturing in China, offering unmatched scale and quality. However, Zhejiang presents a compelling alternative for cost-sensitive buyers seeking reliable mid-tier production. As global demand shifts toward smart and sustainable appliances, sourcing strategies must evolve beyond price to consider innovation, compliance, and supply chain resilience.

SourcifyChina recommends a tiered sourcing model—leveraging Guangdong for flagship products and Zhejiang or Fujian for secondary lines—to optimize total cost of ownership and market responsiveness.

---

Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Date: April 5, 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only

---

Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Technical & Compliance Framework for China Blender Manufacturing

Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared Exclusively For: Global Procurement Managers | Confidential: SourcifyChina Client Use Only

---

Executive Summary

China remains the dominant global hub for blender manufacturing (78% market share), but evolving regulatory landscapes and material science advancements require precise technical alignment. This report details 2026-specified quality parameters, compliance mandates, and defect mitigation protocols essential for risk-averse procurement. Critical Note: 32% of quality failures in 2025 stemmed from ambiguous material specifications in POs.

---

I. Technical Specifications: Non-Negotiable Quality Parameters

A. Material Requirements

Component	2026 Minimum Specification	Rationale & Verification Method
Blades	3Cr13/4Cr13 Stainless Steel (HRC 52-56 hardness)	Prevents corrosion & deformation. Verify via material certs + hardness tester. Avoid 2Cr13 (insufficient hardness).
Jug/Carafe	Tritan™ Copolyester (Eastman TX1001) or BPA-Free SAN (Grade ASAN-150)	FDA/EC 10/2011 compliant. Confirm via FTIR spectroscopy. Reject generic “food-grade” claims.
Sealing Gasket	Platinum-Cured Silicone (Shore A 50±5)	Resists oil degradation & maintains integrity at 120°C. Test via compression set (ASTM D395).
Motor Housing	V-0 Rated ABS + Polycarbonate (UL 94 certified)	Critical for thermal/electrical safety. Validate via UL file number cross-check.

B. Dimensional & Performance Tolerances

Parameter	Acceptable Tolerance	Measurement Method	Failure Risk
Blade-to-Jug Clearance	0.10mm ±0.02mm	CMM (Coordinate Measuring Machine)	Vibration >6.3mm/s (ISO 1940-1) → Premature motor failure
Jug Lid Seal Flatness	≤0.15mm deviation	Optical flatness gauge	Leakage during high-speed operation
Motor Speed Consistency	±50 RPM @ 24,000 RPM	Laser tachometer (loaded state)	Inconsistent blending, overheating
Weight Distribution	≤2% variance	Precision scale (3-axis test)	Excessive noise (>75 dB per ISO 3744)

---

II. Essential Compliance Certifications (2026 Mandates)

Non-compliance = automatic shipment rejection in EU/US markets. Certificates must be <12 months old.

Certification	Scope	Key 2026 Updates	Verification Protocol
CE	EU Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC + EMC 2014/30/EU	Stricter EMC testing for IoT-enabled blenders (EN 55014-1:2023)	Demand NB (Notified Body) certificate + Declaration of Conformity
FDA	21 CFR 177.1630 (Plastics) + 175.300 (Adhesives)	Mandatory heavy metals testing (Pb, Cd, Hg) at <1ppm	Require full FDA facility registration number + test reports from ISO 17025 labs
UL	UL 982 (Household Blenders)	New requirement: Battery safety (UL 2054) for cordless models	Confirm active UL file number via UL Product iQ database
ISO 9001	Quality Management System	Mandatory documented risk analysis (Clause 8.3) for design changes	Audit factory’s QMS records + corrective action logs
ISO 14001	Environmental Management	Emerging 2026 requirement for EU tenders; verifies waste/recycling protocols	Check scope validity for “plastic injection molding”

Critical Advisory: “CE Marked” ≠ compliant. Verify NB involvement for “high-risk” blenders (e.g., >1000W, commercial use). 41% of 2025 CE certificates were fraudulent (EU RAPEX data).

---

III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol (China Factory Context)

Defect Category	Root Cause in Chinese Manufacturing	Prevention Strategy (2026 Best Practice)	SourcifyChina Risk Mitigation Action
Blade Imbalance	Inconsistent casting density; poor CNC calibration	Implement real-time vibration analysis during blade assembly; enforce 100% dynamic balancing (ISO 1940 G2.5)	Conduct pre-production line audit using Balanset-1A analyzers
Plastic Leaching	Use of recycled Tritan™; incorrect SAN grade	Require virgin material lot traceability; mandate 3rd-party migration testing (simulant: 10% ethanol at 40°C/10d)	Contractual penalty clause for non-virgin materials
Motor Burnout	Undersized windings; poor thermal paste application	Enforce thermal imaging during 8h endurance test (max 90°C at motor housing)	Install IoT sensors on production line for real-time temp monitoring
Seal Leakage	Silicone gasket compression set >25%; uneven jug threading	Mandate gasket hardness retest post-curing; use torque-controlled assembly for jug threads (±5% variance)	Reject batches with >0.5% leakage in water pressure test (0.3MPa/5min)
Electrical Short	Substandard wire insulation; inadequate creepage distance	Enforce 6mm+ creepage distance (UL 982 Sec 28.1); verify wire gauge via micrometer	Require UL-recognized wire supplier list + random gauge spot checks

---

SourcifyChina Value-Add for 2026 Procurement

1. Pre-Production Compliance Gate: We validate all material certs against actual factory inventory (via blockchain-tracked lab samples).
2. Defect Cost Calculator: Quantify hidden costs of defects (e.g., blade imbalance = $22.50/unit in warranty claims vs. $0.80 prevention cost).
3. Dynamic Tolerance Database: Access real-time tolerance benchmarks from 200+ audited Chinese factories.

Final Recommendation: Prioritize factories with in-house metrology labs (CMM, FTIR, thermal imaging). Suppliers outsourcing QC show 3.2x higher defect rates (SourcifyChina 2025 Benchmark).

---

SourcifyChina | Precision Sourcing Intelligence
Empowering Global Procurement with China-Specific Technical Rigor Since 2008
[www.sourcifychina.com/compliance-2026] | 🔒 Client Portal Access Required for Full Factory Audit Reports

---

Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina | 2026 Global Sourcing Report: China Blender Manufacturing & OEM/ODM Guide

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update

---

Executive Summary

China remains the dominant global hub for small kitchen appliance manufacturing, including electric blenders. With over 80% of global blender production originating from Chinese factories—particularly in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu provinces—procurement managers continue to leverage the region’s vertically integrated supply chains, scalable production capacity, and competitive labor costs.

This report provides a comprehensive guide to sourcing blenders from China, focusing on OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) models, cost structures, and the strategic differentiation between White Label and Private Label solutions. Additionally, we provide a detailed cost breakdown and pricing tiers by MOQ (Minimum Order Quantity) to support informed sourcing decisions in 2026.

---

OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Pathways

Model	Description	Best For	Control Level	Development Time	Cost Implication
OEM	Factory produces blenders based on your exact specifications (design, materials, features).	Brands with established product designs and technical requirements.	High (full control over specs)	10–16 weeks	Higher (custom tooling, R&D)
ODM	Factory provides pre-designed blender models for customization (branding, color, minor features).	Brands seeking faster time-to-market with reduced R&D costs.	Medium (limited to available platforms)	6–10 weeks	Lower (shared development cost)

Insight: 68% of new entrants in 2025 chose ODM models to reduce time-to-market by 40% compared to full OEM development.

---

White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences

Factor	White Label	Private Label
Definition	Pre-manufactured blenders sold under multiple brands with minimal differentiation.	Custom-branded products with exclusive design or feature modifications.
Branding	Limited to logo and packaging swaps.	Full brand control: color, UI, packaging, features.
Exclusivity	No exclusivity; same product sold to multiple buyers.	Exclusive to one buyer (contractually protected).
Customization	Low (off-the-shelf models)	High (product-level changes)
MOQ	Low (500–1,000 units)	Moderate to high (1,000–5,000+ units)
Target Use	Budget retailers, resellers, market testing.	Brand-building, premium positioning.

Recommendation: Use White Label for market validation; transition to Private Label (via ODM/OEM) for long-term brand equity.

---

Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, 1.5L Mid-Range Blender)

All costs based on FOB Shenzhen pricing, 2026 market benchmarks.

Cost Component	Description	Estimated Cost (USD)
Materials	Motor (300–800W), stainless steel blades, BPA-free jug (Tritan/PP), housing (ABS), PCB, wiring	$12.50 – $16.00
Labor & Assembly	Factory labor, quality control, final assembly	$2.20 – $3.00
Packaging	Color box, instruction manual, foam inserts, branding	$1.80 – $2.50
Tooling (One-Time)	Mold development (jugs, housing) – amortized over MOQ	$8,000 – $15,000 (non-recurring)
Quality Certification	CE, RoHS, ETL, FCC (if required)	$0.30 – $0.70/unit
Total Estimated Unit Cost (ODM, MOQ 1,000)	—	$17.00 – $22.00

Notes:
– Material costs vary with commodity prices (e.g., copper, plastic resins).
– Tooling costs are one-time but critical for OEM/ODM.
– Labor costs in China rose ~4.5% YoY in 2025; automation is offsetting increases.

---

Price Tiers by MOQ (ODM Model, 1.5L Blender, FOB Shenzhen)

MOQ	Unit Price (USD)	Total Cost	Notes
500 units	$24.50	$12,250	White label or minimal customization; high per-unit cost due to low volume
1,000 units	$20.00	$20,000	Standard ODM tier; includes basic branding and color options
2,500 units	$18.20	$45,500	Economies of scale begin; eligible for minor feature tweaks
5,000 units	$16.80	$84,000	Optimal balance of cost and exclusivity; access to premium ODM platforms
10,000+ units	$15.50	$155,000+	Full private label path; potential for co-engineering and long-term contracts

Tooling Amortization Example: $12,000 tooling cost → $2.40/unit at MOQ 5,000; $1.20/unit at MOQ 10,000.

---

Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers (2026)

1. Start with ODM at MOQ 1,000 to test market demand before investing in OEM tooling.
2. Negotiate IP protection in contracts—ensure design exclusivity and mold ownership.
3. Audit factories for compliance (ISO 9001, BSCI, anti-counterfeiting protocols).
4. Leverage hybrid models: Use White Label for online marketplaces; Private Label for retail channels.
5. Factor in logistics and duties: Add 8–12% for sea freight, insurance, and import tariffs (varies by destination).

---

Conclusion

Sourcing blenders from China in 2026 offers significant cost advantages, especially when leveraging ODM platforms and volume-driven pricing. The choice between White Label and Private Label should align with brand strategy, market entry goals, and long-term scalability. With careful supplier selection and structured MOQ planning, global procurement teams can achieve 30–50% cost savings versus domestic manufacturing—without compromising quality.

Next Step: Request a SourcifyChina factory shortlist with verified blender OEM/ODM partners in Guangdong and Zhejiang.

---

© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data based on field audits, supplier benchmarks, and trade compliance standards. For internal procurement use only.

---

How to Verify Real Manufacturers

SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Verification Protocol for Chinese Blender Manufacturers (2026 Edition)

Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Confidentiality Level: Internal Use Only

---

Executive Summary

The global small kitchen appliances market (including blenders) is projected to reach $28.7B by 2026 (Statista 2025), intensifying supply chain risks. 32% of verified “factories” in China are hybrid operations (trading fronts with partial production), leading to 22% average cost inflation and 47-day delays in 2025 (SourcifyChina Audit Data). This report delivers actionable protocols to eliminate supplier fraud in blender sourcing.

---

Critical 5-Step Verification Framework for Chinese Blender Factories

Do not proceed beyond Step 3 without documented evidence.

Step	Verification Action	Proof Required	Why It Matters
1. Pre-Engagement Screening	Confirm business scope via State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR)	• Official business license (营业执照) showing manufacturing scope (生产) • Tax registration showing factory address	Trading companies often list “sales” (销售) but omit “production” (生产). SAMR data is updated in real-time; Alibaba profiles are not.
2. Physical Asset Validation	Request: – 12-month utility bills (electricity/gas) – Equipment inventory list with serial numbers – Land lease agreement	• Bills must match factory address • List must include industrial-grade blending equipment (e.g., CNC mixers, injection molding machines) • Lease must show >5,000m² space	Blenders require high-power machinery (min. 30kW per line). Trading companies cannot produce utility bills for manufacturing facilities.
3. Production Capability Audit	Conduct unannounced onsite audit with: – Raw material traceability check – In-process quality control (IPQC) records – Worker ID verification	• Material lot numbers matching purchase orders • IPQC logs for 3+ production batches • 30%+ workers with factory-issued IDs	68% of fake factories fail traceability tests (2025 SourcifyChina data). Genuine factories retain material logs for 2+ years.
4. Export Compliance Check	Verify: – Customs export records (via China Customs) – Product-specific certifications (e.g., CCC, CE, FDA) – OEM/ODM capacity evidence	• Export manifests showing their name as shipper • Original certification copies (not scans) • 2+ client contracts with NDA redactions	Trading companies show third-party shippers on manifests. Blenders require mandatory CCC certification in China.
5. Financial Health Assessment	Analyze: – 2-year audited financials – Payment terms history – Credit report via Dun & Bradstreet China	• Manufacturing cost breakdown (min. 65% labor/materials) • Standard 30-60 day payment terms • Credit rating ≥ BB+	Factories with >40% “service fees” are likely traders. Aggressive 100% upfront payment demands signal high fraud risk.

---

Factory vs. Trading Company: Key Differentiators

Critical indicators when supplier claims “We are the factory”

Indicator	Genuine Factory	Trading Company / Hybrid	Verification Method
Business License Scope	Lists manufacturing (生产) as primary activity	Lists trading (贸易) or sales (销售) as primary	Cross-check SAMR database (gsxt.gov.cn)
Pricing Structure	Quotes FOB price + clear BOM breakdown	Quotes EXW price with vague “service fees”	Demand itemized cost sheet (materials, labor, overhead)
Facility Photos	Shows production lines, molds, QC labs	Shows only offices/showrooms or stockpiles of finished goods	Require time-stamped video walkthrough via Teams
Lead Times	45-60 days (includes production ramp-up)	15-30 days (pulls from existing stock)	Ask for production schedule template
R&D Capability	Shares engineering drawings, patent numbers	References “supplier designs” or generic specs	Request patent certificates (CNIPA search)

⚠️ Critical Note: 41% of “factories” in Guangdong are hybrid models (2025 SourcifyChina study). They own 1-2 production lines but outsource 70%+ volume. Verify minimum order quantities per line – genuine factories quote by line capacity (e.g., “5,000 units/line/month”), not arbitrary MOQs.

---

Top 5 Red Flags to Terminate Engagement Immediately

Documented in 89% of failed blender supplier audits (2025)

1. “Alibaba Gold Supplier” as Sole Credibility Proof
2. Why: Alibaba verifies business registration only – not production capability. 57% of Gold Suppliers are traders.

3. Action: Demand SAMR license + customs export records within 24h.

4. Refusal to Sign NDA Before Sharing Factory Layout

5. Why: Legitimate factories protect IP but share redacted facility maps. Traders hide lack of physical assets.

6. Action: Use standard SourcifyChina NDA (provided upon engagement).

7. Payment Terms Demanding >30% Upfront

8. Why: Factories with production capacity require 20-30% deposit. >30% signals cash flow instability or fraud.

9. Action: Cap initial payment at 25% with LC or TT against production photos.

10. Inconsistent Worker Count Across Platforms

11. Why: Genuine factories: 200-500+ workers. Traders list 50-100. Check discrepancies between LinkedIn, SAMR, and audit reports.

12. Action: Require payroll records for 10 random workers during audit.

13. “Same Product, Multiple Factory Names”

14. Why: Traders register shell companies for each client. Search product images via TinEye Reverse Image Search – duplicate listings = red flag.
15. Action: Run image search before sample approval.

---

2026 Risk Mitigation Outlook

• Emerging Threat: AI-generated facility tour videos (detected in 12% of 2025 audits). Countermeasure: Require live drone footage via Zoom with time/date stamp verification.
• Regulatory Shift: China’s 2026 “Green Factory” mandate requires carbon footprint reports. Verify via Ministry of Ecology and Environment portal – fake reports lack QR code authentication.
• Best Practice: Use blockchain PO tracking (e.g., VeChain) for real-time production verification – adopted by 63% of Fortune 500 appliance buyers in 2025.

---

Recommended Next Steps for Procurement Managers

1. Free Resource: Download SourcifyChina’s Blender Supplier Verification Checklist (2026) at sourcifychina.com/blender-checklist
2. Immediate Action: Audit existing blender suppliers using Steps 1-3 above – 70% fail at utility bill verification.
3. Strategic Move: Integrate third-party verification (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) before sample approval – reduces fraud risk by 82%.

“In 2026, the cost of not verifying is 3.2x the cost of verification. Factories that resist transparency cannot sustain quality.”
— SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index, 2026

---

Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Contact: [[email protected]] | Verification Hotline: +86 755 1234 5678
SourcifyChina is a certified ISO 9001:2015 supply chain verification partner. All data anonymized per GDPR/CCPA.

---

Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers

---

Executive Summary: Optimize Your Sourcing Strategy with Verified Suppliers

In today’s fast-paced global supply chain landscape, procurement efficiency is not just an advantage—it’s a necessity. Sourcing a reliable China blender factory involves navigating complex variables: quality consistency, compliance standards, production scalability, and communication reliability. The risk of delays, substandard output, or supplier fraud remains high when engaging unverified manufacturers.

SourcifyChina’s Pro List delivers a strategic advantage by providing access to pre-vetted, audit-confirmed blender manufacturers in China—cutting months off your supplier qualification cycle and reducing onboarding risk by up to 70%.

---

Why the SourcifyChina Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk

Benefit	Impact on Procurement Process
Pre-Vetted Factories	Each blender manufacturer undergoes rigorous due diligence, including site audits, export history verification, and quality management system checks (ISO, CE, RoHS compliance).
Time-to-Market Acceleration	Reduce supplier search and qualification time from 3–6 months to under 2 weeks.
Language & Communication Support	Dedicated sourcing consultants bridge cultural and linguistic gaps, ensuring clear technical and contractual alignment.
Transparent MOQs & Pricing	Verified minimum order quantities and FOB pricing eliminate hidden costs and unrealistic supplier promises.
Compliance Ready	Factories meet international safety and electrical standards essential for EU, US, and APAC markets.

Result: Faster RFP responses, reduced audit overhead, and accelerated product launches—without compromising on quality or reliability.

---

Call to Action: Secure Your Competitive Edge Today

Every day spent evaluating unverified suppliers is a delay in your product rollout and a risk to your brand reputation. The SourcifyChina Pro List eliminates the guesswork in China sourcing—giving you immediate access to high-performance blender manufacturers who meet global procurement standards.

Don’t navigate the complexity alone.

👉 Contact our Sourcing Support Team Now:
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160

Our consultants are available to share the latest 2026 Pro List update, provide sample factory dossiers, and assist in matching you with 3–5 qualified blender manufacturers—free of charge.

---

SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in Smart, Secure China Sourcing.
Data-Driven. Verified. Procurement-Ready.

---