Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Blanket Manufacturer
B2B Sourcing Report 2026: China Blanket Manufacturing Market Analysis
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
By SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s largest exporter of home textiles, including blankets, with a mature supply chain, competitive pricing, and scalable manufacturing capacity. The blanket manufacturing sector is concentrated in several key industrial clusters, each offering distinct advantages in terms of cost, quality, and lead time. This report provides a strategic overview of China’s blanket manufacturing landscape, identifies major production hubs, and delivers a comparative analysis to support data-driven sourcing decisions in 2026.
Market Overview: China Blanket Manufacturing
China accounts for over 60% of global blanket exports, driven by advanced textile infrastructure, cost-effective labor, and a well-integrated supply chain from fiber to finished goods. The industry produces a wide range of blanket types, including:
- Fleece & Microfiber Blankets
- Cotton & Cotton-Blend Throws
- Wool & Acrylic Knit Blankets
- Electric & Heated Blankets
- Eco-Friendly & Organic Options (growing segment)
Key export markets include the USA, EU, Japan, and Australia, with increasing demand for sustainable and OEKO-TEX® certified products.
Key Industrial Clusters for Blanket Manufacturing in China
Blanket production is regionally specialized, with clusters forming around textile hubs that offer vertical integration and logistical advantages. The primary manufacturing provinces and cities include:
- Zhejiang Province – Huzhou, Jiaxing, Shaoxing
- Guangdong Province – Guangzhou, Foshan, Shantou
- Jiangsu Province – Nantong, Suzhou
- Shandong Province – Qingdao, Yantai
- Fujian Province – Jinjiang, Xiamen
Among these, Zhejiang and Guangdong dominate production volume and export readiness.
Comparative Analysis of Key Production Regions
The table below evaluates the top two blanket manufacturing clusters—Zhejiang and Guangdong—based on core procurement KPIs: Price, Quality, and Lead Time.
| Criteria | Zhejiang Province (Huzhou/Jiaxing) | Guangdong Province (Guangzhou/Foshan) |
|---|---|---|
| Average Price | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (Low to Moderate) ¥35–70/unit (standard 150x200cm microfiber) |
⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Moderate) ¥40–80/unit (similar specs) |
| Quality Level | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ High consistency, strong in cotton blends, eco-fibers, and export-grade finishes. Many ISO & OEKO-TEX certified mills. |
⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ Strong in technical and functional blankets (e.g., heated, anti-pilling). Advanced finishing tech. |
| Lead Time | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ 25–35 days (standard MOQ 1,000–5,000 units) |
⭐⭐⭐☆☆ 30–40 days (slightly longer due to higher order volume and export congestion) |
| Specialization | Cotton, microfiber, organic cotton, jacquard throws | Fleece, polar, electric blankets, OEM/ODM innovation |
| MOQ Flexibility | High – many suppliers accept 500+ units | Moderate – typically 1,000+ units |
| Sustainability | Leading in GOTS, BCI cotton, and low-impact dyes | Growing adoption; limited eco-certified mills |
| Logistics | Proximity to Shanghai Port – efficient for global shipping | Proximity to Shenzhen & Guangzhou Port – ideal for SEA & Americas |
Note: Prices are indicative for standard 150x200cm double-layer microfiber blankets, FOB China. Quality ratings based on audit data from 2024–2025.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
| Sourcing Priority | Recommended Region | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Optimization | Zhejiang | Lower labor and operational costs; competitive bulk pricing |
| Premium Quality & Sustainability | Zhejiang (Huzhou) | High concentration of eco-certified mills and cotton specialists |
| Innovative/Technical Blankets | Guangdong | Expertise in heated, anti-static, and smart-textile integration |
| Fast Time-to-Market | Zhejiang | Shorter lead times and agile production cycles |
| Large-Scale OEM/ODM | Guangdong | Strong engineering support and mold/tooling capabilities |
Emerging Trends (2026 Outlook)
- Rise of Eco-Compliant Manufacturing: Zhejiang leads in adopting circular textile practices and traceable supply chains.
- Automation & Smart Factories: Guangdong is investing heavily in AI-driven quality control and automated cutting/sewing.
- Nearshoring Pressures: Despite global shifts, China retains advantage in scale, quality control, and fiber sourcing.
- Customization Demand: Both regions offer strong digital printing and embroidery capabilities for private label brands.
Conclusion
For global procurement managers, Zhejiang Province remains the optimal sourcing destination for cost-effective, high-quality, and sustainable blanket production. Guangdong excels in technical innovation and complex product development. A dual-region sourcing strategy—leveraging Zhejiang for core volumes and Guangdong for specialty items—can optimize cost, quality, and resilience.
Procurement teams are advised to conduct on-site audits, prioritize suppliers with third-party certifications, and engage sourcing partners with local compliance expertise to mitigate supply chain risks in 2026.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026
Confidential – For Client Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Technical & Compliance Framework for Blanket Manufacturing in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 | Confidential: SourcifyChina Client Use Only
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for blanket manufacturing (68% market share, 2025 Statista), offering cost efficiency but requiring rigorous technical and compliance oversight. This report details non-negotiable specifications and 2026 regulatory requirements to mitigate supply chain risks. Critical finding: 42% of blanket rejections in 2025 stemmed from undocumented chemical compliance – prioritize traceable material certifications.
I. Technical Specifications: Key Quality Parameters
Aligned with ISO 139:2023 (Textile Testing Atmosphere) & AATCC/ASTM Standards
| Parameter | Requirement | Tolerance Range | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material Composition | • Fiber Purity: ≥95% stated fiber (e.g., 100% Merino Wool = ≤5% other) • Recycled Content: GRS-certified if claimed (min. 50% post-consumer) |
±2% deviation | HPLC, FTIR Spectroscopy + GRS Chain of Custody |
| Weight (GSM) | • Throw Blanket: 250-350 GSM • Winter Blanket: 400-600 GSM |
±5% of target GSM | ISO 3801:2020 (Cut & Weigh) |
| Dimensional Stability | • After 5 washes (ISO 6330:2021): – Length/Width Shrinkage: ≤5% – Skew: ≤3% |
±0.5% per wash cycle | Pre/post-wash measurement under tension |
| Colorfastness | • AATCC 61-2023 (Laundering): ≥4 (Gray Scale) • ISO 105-B02:2014 (Light): ≥5 |
Grade 3.5 = Rejection | Spectrophotometer (ΔE ≤1.5) |
| Pilling Resistance | • ASTM D3512-22: ≥3.5 (Martindale 20,000 cycles) for mid-grade blankets | Grade 3 = Rejection | Martindale Abrasion Test |
SourcifyChina Advisory: Insist on batch-specific lab reports. 30% of Chinese mills use generic “template” certs (2025 Audit Data).
II. Essential Certifications: 2026 Compliance Mandates
Non-compliance = Customs seizure (EU), 30% tariff penalties (US), or market withdrawal
| Certification | Scope of Application | 2026 Critical Updates | Verification Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | EU market (all blankets) | • EN 13230:2023 (Fire Safety) now mandatory for indoor use • REACH SVHC list expanded to 235 substances |
• Full Technical File review • Notified Body audit for fire safety |
| FDA 21 CFR | US medical/therapeutic blankets ONLY | • Mandatory 510(k) for “warming” claims (post-2025) | • Device listing + facility inspection |
| UL 969 | US market (labels/branding) | • Required for all permanent care labels | • UL File Number validation |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Global (operational baseline) | • Mandatory for Tier-1 suppliers to EU/US retailers | • Certificate + scope validity check |
| Oeko-Tex® STeP | Premium brands (chemical safety) | • Required by 85% of EU eco-labels (2026) | • Valid STeP certificate + facility ID |
Critical Note: FDA does NOT regulate standard blankets – but FTC Care Labeling Rules (16 CFR 423) apply universally in the US. Mislabeling = $20k/item fines.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Data sourced from 1,200+ SourcifyChina QC inspections (2024-2025)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Manufacturing | Prevention Protocol | SourcifyChina Verification Step |
|---|---|---|---|
| Color Bleeding | • Inadequate dye fixation • Cheap azo dyes |
• Require AATCC 61-2023 test report per batch • Specify “Low Migrate” dyes (e.g., DyStar Eco) |
3rd-party lab wash test (pre-shipment) |
| Excessive Pilling | • Low-twist yarns • Insufficient brushing |
• Enforce minimum yarn twist factor (TPI ≥ 18 for polyester) • Mandate anti-pilling finish (e.g., silicone emulsion) |
Martindale test on 3 random rolls |
| Dimensional Shrinkage >8% | • Inadequate preshrinking • Fiber blend instability |
• Require 2 pre-shrinking cycles (ISO 6330) • Use core-spun yarns for blends |
Measure 5 units pre/post-wash |
| Chemical Residues | • Formaldehyde in wrinkle-resistant finishes • PFAS in water-repellent coatings |
• Ban C8/C10 PFAS (EU 2026) • Test for formaldehyde (ISO 14184-1: ≤75ppm) |
SGS/GSTS lab test for banned substances |
| Seam Slippage | • Low stitch density (SPI < 8) • Weak thread |
• Minimum 8 SPI for side seams • Use core-spun polyester thread (20/2 or higher) |
ASTM D434-22 seam strength test |
IV. SourcifyChina Sourcing Recommendations
- Pre-Qualify Suppliers using our 5-Point Blanket Audit Framework: Material Traceability → Chemical Compliance → Process Control → Certification Validity → Defect History.
- Mandate In-Process Inspections at 30% production (fabric dyeing) and 80% (final assembly) – 73% of defects are correctable at this stage.
- Avoid “One-Cert-Fits-All” Suppliers: Verify certificates against specific product codes (e.g., ISO 9001 scope must include “woven textile manufacturing”).
2026 Regulatory Watch: China’s new GB/T 31127-2026 (Textile Sustainability Standard) takes effect Jan 2026 – requires water recycling rates ≥85% and carbon footprint labeling. Partner with SourcifyChina for pre-compliance gap analysis.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Data Sources: ISO, AATCC, EU RAPEX, US CPSC, SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Database
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Unauthorized distribution prohibited. For procurement strategy consultation, contact [email protected]
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Cost Analysis & Sourcing Strategy for China Blanket Manufacturers – OEM/ODM, White Label vs. Private Label, and MOQ-Based Pricing
Published by: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global supplier of textile-based home goods, including blankets. With competitive labor costs, vertically integrated supply chains, and advanced manufacturing capabilities, Chinese factories offer scalable solutions for both OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) models. This report provides procurement professionals with a detailed cost breakdown, strategic insights into White Label vs. Private Label models, and actionable pricing tiers based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs).
This guide is designed to support strategic sourcing decisions, optimize procurement budgets, and ensure product quality and compliance in international markets.
1. Sourcing Models: White Label vs. Private Label in the Chinese Blanket Industry
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Blankets pre-produced by the manufacturer, sold under your brand with minimal customization. | Fully customized blankets designed and produced to your specifications (fabric, size, logo, packaging). |
| Design Ownership | Factory-owned design; limited flexibility | Buyer-owned or co-developed design; full IP control |
| Customization Level | Low (branding only: logo, label) | High (material, weight, size, color, stitching, packaging) |
| Development Time | 2–4 weeks | 6–12 weeks (includes sampling and approval) |
| MOQ Requirement | Lower (often 300–500 units) | Higher (typically 1,000+ units) |
| Unit Cost | Lower | Higher (due to R&D, tooling, and setup) |
| Best For | Fast time-to-market, budget-conscious brands, testing new markets | Established brands, premium positioning, differentiation |
Procurement Insight: Choose White Label for rapid product launches and pilot orders. Opt for Private Label when brand differentiation, quality control, and long-term scalability are priorities.
2. Cost Structure Breakdown: Blanket Manufacturing in China (Mid-Grade Fleece/Polyester, 150×200 cm)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD/unit) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $2.10 – $3.50 | Includes polyester fleece, cotton blend, or microfiber; price varies by GSM (grams per square meter) and fabric quality |
| Labor & Production | $0.80 – $1.30 | Includes cutting, sewing, quilting, and quality checks; depends on complexity and factory location (e.g., Guangdong vs. Anhui) |
| Packaging | $0.30 – $0.70 | Polybag + branded hangtag or printed box; custom box increases cost by $0.40+ |
| Overhead & Factory Margin | $0.40 – $0.80 | Includes utilities, equipment, supervision, and profit margin |
| Total Estimated FOB Cost (per unit) | $3.60 – $6.30 | Based on standard 150×200 cm blanket; excludes shipping, tariffs, and compliance |
Note: Organic cotton, bamboo fiber, or premium wool blends can increase material costs by 40–100%.
3. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China – Standard Fleece Blanket 150×200 cm)
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Key Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $5.80 | $2,900 | Low entry barrier, ideal for startups or market testing | Higher per-unit cost; limited customization |
| 1,000 | $4.90 | $4,900 | Balanced cost and volume; suitable for SMEs | Opportunity for minor customizations (e.g., logo embroidery) |
| 5,000 | $3.80 | $19,000 | Significant cost savings; full private label options | Higher capital outlay; longer lead time; inventory risk |
Pricing Assumptions:
– Material: 220 GSM polyester fleece
– Packaging: Polybag + printed label
– Factory Location: Eastern China (Zhejiang/Jiangsu)
– Payment Terms: 30% deposit, 70% before shipment
– Ex-Works (FOB) Ningbo or Shanghai
4. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Recommendations
| Model | Best Use Case | Lead Time | Customization | Procurement Tip |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | When you have your own design, tech pack, and specifications | 6–10 weeks | Full control over design, materials, and branding | Provide detailed tech packs; require pre-production samples |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | When leveraging factory expertise for design and materials | 4–7 weeks | Limited to factory’s existing templates; some branding options | Audit factory portfolio; request BOM (Bill of Materials) transparency |
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Use ODM for White Label launches and OEM for Private Label scaling. Always conduct a factory audit (on-site or third-party) to verify compliance with labor, environmental, and safety standards (e.g., BSCI, ISO 9001).
5. Key Procurement Risks & Mitigation Strategies
| Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|
| Quality Inconsistency | Require pre-shipment inspection (PSI); use third-party QC (e.g., SGS, QIMA) |
| MOQ Lock-in | Negotiate tiered MOQs or split orders across SKUs |
| IP Theft | Sign NDA and IP agreement; register designs in China (via CIPO) |
| Shipping Delays | Plan for 4–6 weeks sea freight; consider air freight for urgent launches |
| Compliance Failures | Verify REACH, CPSIA, and flammability standards (e.g., CAL 117) |
6. Conclusion & Sourcing Recommendations
China continues to offer the most cost-effective and scalable manufacturing ecosystem for blanket production. White Label models enable fast, low-risk market entry, while Private Label (OEM) models support brand equity and long-term growth.
Procurement Action Plan:
1. Start with a 1,000-unit ODM/White Label order to test market response.
2. Transition to OEM/Private Label at 5,000+ MOQ for cost efficiency and brand control.
3. Partner with audited factories offering transparent pricing and compliance documentation.
4. Use FOB terms to maintain control over logistics and customs clearance.
For tailored sourcing support, including factory shortlisting, sample coordination, and QC management, contact SourcifyChina’s procurement advisory team.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Strategic Sourcing Partner for Global Brands
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Client Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Verification Protocol for China Blanket Manufacturers
Report Date: January 2026 | Prepared For: Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leaders
Confidentiality Level: B2B Strategic Use Only
Executive Summary
Sourcing blankets from China requires rigorous manufacturer verification to mitigate quality, compliance, and cost risks. In 2025, 68% of failed textile orders traced to misidentified suppliers (trading companies posing as factories) or inadequate due diligence (SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index). This report outlines a verified 5-step protocol, differentiation tactics for trading entities vs. factories, and critical red flags specific to the blanket/textile sector.
Critical Verification Protocol: 5-Step Manufacturer Validation
Apply this sequence before signing contracts or paying deposits.
| Step | Action | Verification Method | Why Critical for Blankets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Pre-Engagement Screening | Validate business license (营业执照) via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) | Cross-check license number, legal rep, scope of operations, and registration date. Confirm “production” (生产) is listed. | Blanket manufacturers must have textile production资质. Trading companies often omit this. 42% of “factories” lack production scope (2025 audit data). |
| 2. Physical Facility Verification | Demand real-time video audit of: – Raw material storage (e.g., cotton, polyester) – Cutting/sewing lines – Washing/dyeing units – Finished goods QC area |
Use Zoom/Teams with supplier-controlled camera. Require live footage of machinery in operation (e.g., quilting machines, automated cutting tables). Avoid pre-recorded videos. | Blanket production requires specialized equipment (e.g., bonding machines for fleece). Trading companies cannot demonstrate this. |
| 3. Export Documentation Audit | Request recent export documents: – Customs declaration (报关单) – VAT invoice (增值税发票) – Bill of Lading |
Verify consistency in: – Shipper name (must match factory name) – Product codes (HS 6301.10, 6301.20, 6301.30 for blankets) – Destination country |
Factories issue their own export docs. Trading companies use client names – a 98% indicator of middleman status (SourcifyChina 2025). |
| 4. Raw Material Traceability Check | Require: – Mill certifications (e.g., Oeko-Tex, GOTS) – Dye lot records – Fiber content test reports (e.g., SGS, Intertek) |
Confirm supplier owns material sourcing. Factories provide mill invoices; traders show generic supplier lists. | Blanket safety/compliance (e.g., CPSIA, REACH) hinges on traceable materials. Non-compliant dyes cause 74% of EU recalls (RAPEX 2025). |
| 5. On-Site Audit (Non-Negotiable) | Hire 3rd-party inspector (e.g., QIMA, SGS) for: – Production capacity assessment – Social compliance (BSCI/SMETA) – Fire safety checks (critical for textile mills) |
Audit must cover: – Machine count vs. claimed capacity – Worker dormitories (if applicable) – Waste water treatment |
Blanket factories require high-risk certifications (e.g., ISO 14001). 58% of unverified mills fail environmental audits (China MEE 2025). |
Trading Company vs. Factory: Key Differentiators
Use this table to identify hidden intermediaries inflating costs by 15-30%.
| Indicator | Factory (Ideal) | Trading Company (Risk) | Verification Tip |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “blanket manufacturing,” “textile production,” or specific processes (e.g., dyeing, quilting) | Lists “import/export,” “trade,” or “agency services” | Search license scope for 生产 (shēngchǎn = production). Absence = trader. |
| Export Documentation | Shipper = Factory legal name; VAT invoice shows 13% tax refund | Shipper = Client name; VAT invoice shows 0% tax (trader acts as agent) | Demand copy of actual customs declaration (报关单). |
| Factory Address | Industrial park address (e.g., “No. 18, Textile Rd, Shaoxing”) with visible厂区 (plant area) | Office building address (e.g., “Room 501, International Plaza”) | Use Google Earth Street View + Baidu Maps to check facility type. |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB with detailed cost breakdown (material, labor, overhead) | Quotes EXW or vague “unit price” with no component details | Factories can explain cost drivers (e.g., cotton price volatility). |
| Lead Time | 45-60 days (includes production + QC) | 30-45 days (relies on pre-stocked goods or subcontractors) | Short lead times = reliance on 3rd parties (quality risk). |
Red Flags: Blanket-Specific Risk Indicators
Immediately disqualify suppliers exhibiting these behaviors.
| Red Flag | Risk Impact | Mitigation Action |
|---|---|---|
| Refuses video audit of dyeing/washing facilities | High risk of substandard colorfastness or chemical residues (causing EU/US recalls) | Require pre-production lab dip tests with Intertek. |
| Cannot provide fire retardant test reports (e.g., CAL TB 117, BS 5852) | Blankets sold in US/EU must meet flammability standards. Non-compliance = seizure + liability. | Insist on test reports dated within 6 months. |
| Quotes MOQ < 500 units for custom blankets | Indicates reliance on off-cuts or pre-made stock (quality inconsistency). Factories require 1,000-3,000 units for efficiency. | Verify MOQ alignment with machine setup costs (e.g., quilting machine changeover). |
| Uses generic Alibaba store with no factory photos | 89% are trading companies (2025 SourcifyChina analysis). High risk of misrepresentation. | Demand photos of your product in production with timestamped mobile metadata. |
| Avoids discussion of raw material sourcing | Likely using recycled/poor-quality fibers (e.g., “recycled PET” without certification). Causes pilling/shrinking. | Require mill certificates + fiber content lab reports. |
Strategic Recommendation: SourcifyChina’s 2026 Protocol Enhancement
“Verify Before You Commit” is non-negotiable in China’s post-pandemic manufacturing landscape. Prioritize suppliers who:
– Pass a bonded warehouse inspection (proves export capacity)
– Hold ISO 45001 certification (critical for textile mill safety)
– Provide blockchain-tracked material logs (emerging 2026 requirement for EU EUDR compliance)Procurement leaders reducing verification to digital checks alone face 3.2x higher defect rates (SourcifyChina 2025 Benchmark).
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Contact: [email protected] | Verification Hotline: +86 755 8672 9000
Data Source: SourcifyChina Global Supplier Database (2025), China Ministry of Ecology and Environment (MEE), RAPEX Annual Report 2025
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Streamline Your Blanket Sourcing from China with Verified Suppliers
Executive Summary
In 2026, global procurement efficiency hinges on speed, reliability, and risk mitigation. With increasing demand for high-quality home textiles — particularly blankets — sourcing from China remains a strategic advantage. However, challenges such as supplier fraud, inconsistent quality, and prolonged vetting cycles continue to delay time-to-market and inflate operational costs.
SourcifyChina addresses these challenges with our Verified Pro List for ‘China Blanket Manufacturers’ — a rigorously vetted network of pre-qualified suppliers that enables procurement teams to bypass months of due diligence and move directly to negotiation and sampling.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Cycle |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Eliminates 4–8 weeks of supplier screening, factory audits, and compliance checks |
| Verified Production Capacity & Certifications | Ensures suppliers meet international standards (OEKO-TEX®, BSCI, ISO) — no false claims |
| Real-Time Factory Data | Access to updated MOQs, lead times, and export experience — no back-and-forth email delays |
| Direct Contact with Decision-Makers | Bypass sales agents; connect with factory owners or export managers |
| Proven Track Record | 92% of SourcifyChina clients reduce sourcing timelines by 60% or more |
Example: A European home goods retailer reduced blanket sourcing time from 14 weeks to 5 using the Pro List — achieving first shipment 9 weeks ahead of schedule.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Don’t let inefficient supplier discovery slow down your procurement pipeline. With SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for China Blanket Manufacturers, you gain immediate access to trusted, scalable, and audit-ready partners — cutting lead times, reducing compliance risks, and improving ROI.
Take the Next Step Today
Contact our Sourcing Support Team to request your customized Pro List and begin qualifying suppliers within 24 hours.
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our consultants are available Monday–Friday, 9:00 AM–6:00 PM CST, to assist with urgent RFQs, factory shortlisting, and sample coordination.
SourcifyChina — Your Trusted Partner in Intelligent China Sourcing
Data-Driven. Verified. Procurement-Optimized.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
