Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Blanket Factory

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Blanket Manufacturing Landscape 2026

Prepared For: Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leaders
Date: October 26, 2026
Confidentiality: SourcifyChina Client Advisory

---

Executive Summary

China remains the dominant global hub for blanket manufacturing, supplying ~68% of the world’s volume (China Textile Industry Association, 2026). Post-pandemic restructuring, automation adoption, and shifting labor dynamics have consolidated production into specialized industrial clusters. Zhejiang Province now leads in technical and premium blankets, while Guangdong excels in fast-fashion and blended-material production. Strategic sourcing requires precise cluster alignment with product tier, compliance needs, and lead time constraints. Critical Note: “China blanket factory” refers to manufacturing facilities in China producing blankets—not factories producing “China”-branded blankets.

---

Key Industrial Clusters: Blanket Manufacturing Hotspots

China’s blanket production is concentrated in four core clusters, each with distinct capabilities:

Province	Primary Cities	Specialization	Key Advantages	Market Position (2026)
Zhejiang	Shaoxing, Huzhou, Jiaxing	Premium & Technical Blankets (Wool, Cashmere, Organic Cotton, Flame-Retardant, Hotel-Grade)	Highest concentration of ISO 13485/GRS-certified mills; Advanced dyeing/finishing tech; Strong R&D in sustainable materials	#1 for Luxury/Compliance-Driven Orders (42% of export value)
Jiangsu	Nantong, Changzhou	Mid-to-High-End Home Textiles (Fleece, Microfiber, Quilted Throws)	Integrated supply chain (fiber-to-finished goods); High automation rates; Strong OEM/ODM capabilities	#2 for Volume & Consistency (31% of export volume)
Guangdong	Foshan, Zhongshan	Fast-Turnaround & Fashion Blankets (Polyester Blends, Novelty Prints, Promotional)	Proximity to Shenzhen/HK logistics; Agile small-batch production; Expertise in complex trims/embroidery	#1 for Speed & Low MOQs (22% of SME orders)
Shandong	Qingdao, Weifang	Value & Bulk Commodity Blankets (Acrylic, Basic Cotton, Military/Govt. Contracts)	Lower labor costs; Large-scale spinning/weaving facilities; Focus on cost efficiency	#1 for Budget & High-Volume (18% of volume, 9% of value)

---

Regional Comparison: Critical Sourcing Metrics (2026)

Data reflects FOB pricing for a standard 150x200cm microfiber blanket (220 GSM), 10K unit order.

Region	Price Competitiveness	Quality Tier	Lead Time (Days)	Key Constraints
Zhejiang	$$$$ (Highest)	★★★★★ Premium: AATCC-compliant, low pilling, consistent dye lots. Certifications (OEKO-TEX, GOTS) standard.	15-20	High MOQs (5K+ units); Capacity crunch for luxury fibers; Limited flexibility for rush orders
Jiangsu	$$$ (Mid-High)	★★★★☆ Consistent: Reliable for mid-tier retail. Fewer premium certifications; stronger in bulk consistency	12-18	Slower innovation cycle; Less agile for complex designs; Rising labor costs
Guangdong	$$$ (Mid)	★★★☆☆ Good: Fit for fast fashion. Variable dye consistency; higher defect rates in sub-$5 blankets	10-15	Compliance risks (BSCI audits critical); “Fast fashion” quality not suitable for premium brands
Shandong	$$ (Lowest)	★★☆☆☆ Basic: Functional but inconsistent. Higher shrinkage/pilling; minimal certifications	14-22	Limited design support; weak compliance infrastructure; quality variance between mills

Footnotes:
– Price Scale: $ = Lowest ($3.50-$4.20/unit), $$$$ = Highest ($6.80-$9.50/unit)
– Quality Drivers: Zhejiang leads in technical performance (e.g., thermal retention, durability); Guangdong excels in aesthetic customization.
– Lead Time Reality: 2026 averages include 3-5 days for customs clearance (Shanghai/Ningbo ports outperform Guangzhou).
– Critical Risk: Guangdong faces 12-15% higher compliance failure rates vs. Zhejiang (SourcifyChina Audit Data, Q3 2026).

---

Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers

1. Premium/Luxury Brands: Prioritize Zhejiang. Accept higher costs for guaranteed compliance, traceability, and technical quality. Avoid Shandong for this segment.
2. Fast-Fashion Retailers: Leverage Guangdong for speed but mandate 3rd-party pre-shipment inspections. Use Jiangsu as backup for larger volumes.
3. Budget/Home Value Lines: Shandong offers cost leadership, but require on-site quality control. Pair with Jiangsu mills for better consistency.
4. Sustainability Mandates: Only Zhejiang consistently delivers GOTS/OCS-certified production at scale. Verify mill-specific certifications—not all clusters are equal.
5. Risk Mitigation: Diversify across two clusters (e.g., Zhejiang + Jiangsu) to buffer against port congestion or policy shifts (e.g., Zhejiang’s 2026 “Green Textile” emission rules).

---

The SourcifyChina Advantage

“In 2026, blanket sourcing success hinges on matching cluster DNA to your product’s non-negotiables. We audit 200+ mills quarterly—filtering out non-compliant suppliers so you don’t waste RFQs. Our Zhejiang partner network delivers 30% faster lead times for certified orders via dedicated port lanes.”
— Michael Chen, Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina

Next Step: Request our 2026 Blanket Mill Scorecard (free for qualified procurement teams) with vetted supplier ratings by region, material, and compliance tier. [Contact Sourcing Intelligence Team]

---

Data Sources: China National Textile & Apparel Council (CNTAC), SourcifyChina 2026 Cluster Audit Database, UN Comtrade (HS Code 6301),第三方 Compliance Reports (QIMA, SGS). Methodology: 127 factory audits, 45 client shipments tracked Q1-Q3 2026.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Use Only. Not for Distribution.

---

Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026

Subject: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Sourcing Blankets from China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: January 2026

---

1. Overview

China remains the world’s leading manufacturer and exporter of textile-based home products, including blankets. With over 80% of global blanket production originating from Chinese facilities, understanding technical specifications, quality parameters, and compliance requirements is critical for risk mitigation and product integrity. This report outlines key technical, material, and regulatory considerations for sourcing blankets from Chinese factories.

---

2. Key Quality Parameters

2.1 Material Specifications

Parameter	Standard / Requirement
Fiber Content	Must match declared composition (e.g., 100% cotton, 80% polyester/20% acrylic). Verified via lab testing (e.g., ISO 1833).
Fabric Weight (GSM)	Typically 180–400 gsm depending on type (e.g., fleece: 220–300 gsm, wool-blend: 300–400 gsm). Tolerance: ±5%.
Thread Count	For woven cotton blankets: ≥150 TC (higher for premium grades).
Fill Weight (if applicable)	For filled blankets (e.g., duvets): ±3% tolerance from declared weight.
Color Fastness	≥ Grade 4 (ISO 105-C06) for wash and light exposure.
Pilling Resistance	≥ Grade 3 (ISO 12945-1) after 5,000–10,000 cycles.
Shrinkage	≤3% after 3 home launderings (AATCC Test Method 135).

2.2 Dimensional Tolerances

Product Type	Length/Width Tolerance	Edge Straightness	Seam Allowance
Throw Blanket (130x160cm)	±1.5 cm	≤0.5 cm deviation/m	1.0–1.5 cm
Twin Size (150x200cm)	±2.0 cm	≤0.8 cm deviation/m	1.5 cm
King Size (260x240cm)	±2.5 cm	≤1.0 cm deviation/m	1.5–2.0 cm

---

3. Essential Certifications

Procurement managers must verify that suppliers hold valid and up-to-date certifications relevant to the target market. Below are the key compliance requirements:

Certification	Scope	Applicable Regions	Verification Method
OEKO-TEX® Standard 100	Confirms absence of harmful substances in textiles (Class I for baby products).	EU, US, Canada, Australia	Request valid certificate (check OEKO-TEX® database)
ISO 9001:2015	Quality management system compliance.	Global	Audit certificate + scope validity
REACH (EC 1907/2006)	Restriction of hazardous chemicals (e.g., phthalates, azo dyes).	EU, UK, EEA	Supplier’s chemical compliance declaration
CPSC / ASTM F963	U.S. consumer product safety (especially for children’s blankets).	USA	Lab test report (ILAC-accredited lab)
CE Marking	Required for electric blankets (Low Voltage Directive, RoHS).	EU	Technical file + EU Authorized Representative
UL 1057 / UL 499	Safety standard for electric heating elements (electric blankets).	USA, Canada	UL certification number verification
FDA (if applicable)	For antimicrobial treatments (e.g., silver-ion finishes).	USA	FDA establishment registration + 510(k) if applicable
BSCI / SMETA	Social compliance (labor practices, working conditions).	EU, US (ethical sourcing)	Audit report (valid within 12 months)

Note: Electric blankets require additional compliance: EMI/EMC testing, thermal cut-off safety, and moisture resistance (IPX4 minimum).

---

4. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies

Common Quality Defect	Root Cause	Prevention Strategy
Color Bleeding	Poor dye fixation or incorrect dye type.	Conduct pre-production color fastness testing; use reactive dyes for cotton.
Shrinkage Beyond Tolerance	Inadequate pre-shrinking of fabric.	Require factory to perform pre-washing; verify with AATCC 135 testing.
Pilling & Fuzzing	Low fiber twist or low-quality polyester.	Specify high-tenacity fibers; conduct pilling resistance tests pre-bulk.
Seam Puckering	Incorrect tension or needle size during sewing.	Audit sewing parameters; use appropriate thread and stitch density (e.g., 8–10 SPI).
Dimensional Inaccuracy	Poor cutting alignment or fabric relaxation.	Implement laser cutting; allow fabric relaxation pre-cutting; inspect first article.
Foreign Matter (e.g., hair, lint)	Poor workshop hygiene or open handling.	Enforce cleanroom protocols; conduct final inspection under bright light.
Zipper or Closure Failure	Substandard hardware or poor attachment.	Source zippers from certified suppliers (e.g., YKK); test pull strength (≥5 lbs).
Odor (Chemical or Musty)	Residual processing chemicals or poor storage.	Require odor testing (ASTM E544); ensure proper ventilation in packaging and warehouse.
Labeling Errors	Incorrect fiber content or care symbols.	Audit labels against product specs; use standardized ISO 3758/GB/T 8685 symbols.
Electric Blanket Overheating	Faulty thermostat or wiring.	Require UL/CE-certified heating elements; conduct thermal mapping tests.

---

5. Recommendations for Procurement Managers

1. Factory Audit: Conduct pre-qualification audits focusing on ISO 9001 compliance, lab testing capabilities, and social compliance (BSCI/SMETA).
2. Pre-Production Sample Approval: Require PPS (Pre-Production Sample) with full material and compliance documentation.
3. Third-Party Inspection: Engage SGS, Bureau Veritas, or Intertek for AQL 2.5/4.0 Level II inspections (pre-shipment).
4. Testing Regime: Mandate lab tests for every new material batch (color fastness, pilling, shrinkage, chemical compliance).
5. Traceability: Require batch-level traceability and labeling (LOT numbers, production date).

---

6. Conclusion

Sourcing blankets from China offers cost efficiency and scalability, but quality and compliance risks require structured oversight. By enforcing strict technical specifications, verifying certifications, and mitigating common defects through proactive quality planning, procurement teams can ensure consistent product performance and market compliance in 2026 and beyond.

For sourcing support, compliance verification, or factory audits, contact your SourcifyChina representative.

---

© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For internal procurement use only.

---

Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Blanket Manufacturing

Date: Q1 2026 | Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Confidential: SourcifyChina Client Use Only

---

Executive Summary

China remains the dominant global hub for blanket manufacturing, offering 25-40% cost advantages over Southeast Asian alternatives. However, 2026 market dynamics—driven by rising labor costs (+4.8% YoY), sustainable material premiums, and stricter EU/US compliance requirements—demand strategic sourcing approaches. This report provides actionable data on cost structures, OEM/ODM models, and MOQ-based pricing to optimize your procurement strategy. Key Insight: Private label partnerships with certified factories yield 18-22% higher ROI than white label commoditization for mid-to-high volume buyers (MOQ ≥1,000 units).

---

White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications

Factor	White Label	Private Label	Procurement Recommendation
Definition	Factory’s pre-existing design/brand; you rebrand	Custom design, materials, packaging under your brand	Use for urgent/low-volume needs (<500 units)
MOQ Flexibility	Low (often 100-300 units)	Moderate-High (500-5,000+ units)	White label for test markets; Private for scale
Cost Control	Limited (fixed specs)	High (negotiate materials, trims, tech features)	Private label saves 12-18% at MOQ 1,000+
IP Ownership	None (factory retains design rights)	Full (your specs protected via NDA)	Critical for brand differentiation
Quality Consistency	Variable (shared production lines)	High (dedicated lines, your QC protocols)	Private label reduces defect rates by 30-45%
Best For	Budget startups, flash sales	Established brands, subscription boxes, retail chains	Prioritize Private Label for >$50K annual spend

2026 Trend: 68% of EU/US buyers now mandate private label to comply with new ESG regulations (e.g., EU Ecodesign Directive 2025). White label faces 22% higher rejection rates due to generic quality.

---

Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit: 150x200cm Poly-Cotton Blend Blanket)

FOB Shenzhen Pricing | Based on 2026 Avg. Factory Data (SourcifyChina Verified Network)

Cost Component	Description	Cost Range (USD)	2026 Pressure Points
Materials	80% Recycled Polyester / 20% Organic Cotton	$2.80 – $4.20	+5.2% YoY (sustainable materials premium)
Labor	Cutting, sewing, finishing, QC	$1.90 – $2.50	+4.8% YoY (minimum wage hikes in Guangdong/Jiangsu)
Packaging	Custom-branded poly mailer + hang tag	$0.65 – $1.10	+3.5% YoY (recycled content mandates)
Compliance	Pre-shipment testing (CPC, REACH, OEKO-TEX)	$0.40 – $0.75	+7% YoY (stricter chemical restrictions)
Logistics	Inland freight to port + documentation	$0.35 – $0.55	Stable (port congestion eased post-2025)
TOTAL BASE COST		$6.10 – $9.10	Excludes tooling, mold fees, or branding

Note: Add $0.85-$1.50 for embroidery/logo application or thermal tech fabrics (e.g., Outlast®). Hidden costs (e.g., 3-5% air freight surcharges, currency fluctuation) typically add 8-12% to landed cost.

---

MOQ-Based Price Tiers: FOB Shenzhen (USD per Unit)

Assumes: 150x200cm size, 280 GSM, basic double-stitched hem, standard colors

MOQ	White Label Price	Private Label Price	Savings vs. White Label	Key Conditions
500 units	$8.50 – $12.00	$9.20 – $13.50	N/A (Premium for customization)	+15% setup fee; 45-day lead time
1,000 units	$7.20 – $10.30	$7.80 – $10.90	12-15%	No setup fee; 35-day lead time
5,000 units	$6.00 – $8.70	$6.40 – $9.10	18-22%	Volume discount; 30-day lead time; 2% QC rebate

Critical Notes:
– White Label “Discounts” Trap: Factories often inflate base costs by 15-20% on low-MOQ white label orders to offset small-batch inefficiencies.
– Private Label Threshold: MOQ 1,000+ unlocks true cost efficiency. Below this, white label appears cheaper but lacks brand equity.
– 2026 Reality: Factories now charge $300-$600 for custom jacquard loom setup (vs. $150 in 2023). Budget this in initial quotes.

---

Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers

1. Avoid Sub-500 MOQs for Private Label: Setup fees destroy margins. Use white label only for market testing.
2. Demand Material Traceability: Require GRS (Global Recycled Standard) or OCS certificates. 92% of SourcifyChina’s 2026 client audits found unverified “eco-friendly” claims.
3. Negotiate Tiered Pricing: Lock in $0.30-$0.50/unit reductions at 2,500+ units. Top factories offer this to secure annual contracts.
4. Budget for Compliance Early: Factor in $0.50-$0.75/unit for mandatory 2026 tests (e.g., California TB 117-2013 flammability).
5. Partner with OEM/ODM Hybrids: Factories like Ningbo Textile Innovations (SourcifyChina Tier-1) offer R&D support for functional blankets (e.g., cooling, EMF-shielding) at MOQ 3,000+.

Final Insight: In 2026, blanket sourcing success hinges on strategic partnerships, not transactional buying. Factories with BSCI/SMETA certifications and in-house dyeing capabilities (to avoid third-party contamination) deliver 32% fewer delays.

---

Prepared by: SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultancy | www.sourcifychina.com
Data Sources: SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database (Q4 2025), China Textile Industry Association, EU Market Surveillance Reports
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.

---

How to Verify Real Manufacturers

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing Blankets from China – Verification Protocol, Factory vs. Trading Company Identification, and Risk Mitigation
Published by: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: January 2026

---

Executive Summary

Sourcing blankets from China offers significant cost advantages, but risks such as quality inconsistency, misrepresentation, and supply chain opacity remain prevalent. In 2026, procurement managers must implement a structured verification process to differentiate genuine manufacturers from trading companies and avoid high-risk partners. This report outlines a critical 5-step verification framework, key indicators to distinguish factory operations from trading entities, and red flags to monitor during supplier evaluation.

---

Critical Steps to Verify a Blanket Manufacturer in China

Step	Action	Purpose	Tools & Methods
1. Confirm Business Registration	Verify legal business license via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS)	Ensure legitimacy and registered scope of operations	NECIPS (www.gsxt.gov.cn), third-party verification platforms (e.g., Alibaba Business Check, Tofu Supplier)
2. Conduct Onsite Factory Audit	Schedule unannounced or third-party audit of production site	Validate physical infrastructure, machinery, and workforce	Hire independent inspection firm (e.g., SGS, Intertek, QIMA); use checklist for facilities, equipment, and workflow
3. Review Production Capacity & MOQ	Request production line details, output per shift, and historical batch data	Assess scalability and alignment with procurement volume	Request production schedules, machine count, and staffing data
4. Evaluate Quality Control Systems	Inspect in-process QC, final inspection protocols, and certifications	Ensure consistency and compliance with international standards	Audit QC documentation, test reports, ISO 9001, OEKO-TEX® certification
5. Sample Testing & Lab Validation	Order pre-production samples; conduct third-party lab tests	Confirm material quality, durability, and safety compliance	Test for pilling, shrinkage, colorfastness, flammability, and chemical safety (REACH, CPSIA, etc.)

✅ Best Practice: Use a Supplier Scorecard to rate performance across these steps (e.g., 1–5 scale) for objective comparison.

---

How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory

Misidentifying a trading company as a factory can lead to inflated pricing, communication delays, and reduced quality control. Use the following indicators:

Indicator	Factory	Trading Company
Facility Ownership	Owns production equipment, assembly lines, and warehouse	No machinery; may only have sample room or small office
Workforce	On-site technicians, machine operators, in-house QC staff	Sales representatives, sourcing agents, no technical staff
Production Control	Can adjust loom settings, dye lots, and cutting patterns	Relies on third-party factories; limited control over process
Pricing Transparency	Provides detailed cost breakdown (fabric, labor, overhead)	Quotes lump-sum pricing with limited visibility
Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ)	MOQ based on machine setup and fabric roll length (e.g., 500–1,000 units)	Higher MOQs due to markup layers; may offer flexible MOQs from multiple suppliers
Address & Location	Located in industrial zones (e.g., Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shandong)	Often in commercial districts or CBDs, not manufacturing hubs
Website & Marketing	Showcases machinery, factory floor, production videos	Features product catalogs, stock images, “global supplier” language

🔍 Tip: Ask: “Can I speak with your production manager?” or “Can you show me the weaving/knitting section live via video call?” Factories can comply; trading companies often cannot.

---

Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from a China Blanket Factory

Red Flag	Risk	Recommended Action
Unwillingness to conduct a live factory video tour	Likely not a real factory or hiding substandard conditions	Disqualify or require third-party audit before proceeding
No verifiable certifications (ISO, OEKO-TEX®, BSCI)	Risk of unsafe materials or unethical labor practices	Require certification copies and verify via issuing body
Extremely low pricing compared to market average	Indicates inferior materials, labor exploitation, or scam	Benchmark against industry pricing; conduct material verification
Requests full payment upfront	High fraud risk; no leverage for quality disputes	Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy)
Vague or inconsistent answers about production process	Lack of technical control or transparency	Require detailed SOPs and process documentation
No export experience or references	Risk of logistics delays and compliance failures	Request export licenses, past shipment records, and client testimonials
Use of stock photos or duplicated website content	Indicates a front operation or trading intermediary	Perform reverse image search; verify with onsite audit

---

Conclusion & Strategic Recommendations

In 2026, the Chinese blanket manufacturing sector remains competitive but increasingly complex due to rising compliance standards and supply chain consolidation. Global procurement managers must adopt a due diligence-first approach to mitigate risk and ensure supply chain integrity.

Key Recommendations:

• Prioritize factories with vertical integration (e.g., in-house dyeing, weaving, finishing) for better quality control.
• Leverage third-party inspection services for initial audits and shipment checks.
• Build long-term partnerships with verified suppliers to secure capacity and improve responsiveness.
• Use digital verification tools (e.g., SourcifyChina’s Supplier Trust Index) to pre-screen candidates.

Final Note: A genuine factory invests in transparency. If a supplier resists verification, there is likely something to hide.

---

Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Empowering Global Procurement with Trusted China Sourcing
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com

---

Get the Verified Supplier List

SOURCIFYCHINA PROFESSIONAL SOURCING REPORT 2026

Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Confidential – For Strategic Decision-Making

---

EXECUTIVE INSIGHT: ELIMINATING SUPPLIER VETTING FRICTION IN TEXTILE SOURCING

Global procurement teams face critical delays in identifying verified blanket manufacturers in China. Unvetted supplier directories lead to:
– 150+ wasted hours/year per category manager in fake supplier screening (2025 SourcifyChina Client Data)
– 28% production delays from factories lacking export compliance (ISO 9001/14001 gaps)
– $22K avg. loss per failed order due to quality disputes (post-shipment rework costs)

SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for China blanket factories transforms this risk into strategic advantage.

---

WHY OUR VERIFIED PRO LIST OUTPERFORMS GENERIC SOURCING CHANNELS

Time-to-qualified-supplier comparison for blanket manufacturing (200-500K units/year)

Sourcing Method	Avg. Vetting Time	Risk Exposure	Cost of Errors	SourcifyChina Advantage
Alibaba/General Directories	8-12 weeks	High (63% non-compliant factories)	$18K/order	—
Freelance Sourcing Agents	6-9 weeks	Medium (unverified claims)	$12K/order	—
SourcifyChina Pro List	< 2 weeks	Low (0% non-compliant)	$0 (QC-backed)	72% faster onboarding

KEY TIME-SAVING MECHANISMS

1. Pre-Validated Compliance
   All 37 Pro List blanket factories:
2. Passed on-site ISO 9001/14001 audits (2025)
3. Hold BSCI/SEDEX certifications (no child labor violations)

4. Maintain ≥30% export capacity for EU/US markets

5. Zero-Error Documentation
   Instant access to:

6. Real-time production capacity reports
7. Lab-tested material traceability (OEKO-TEX® 100, GOTS 7.0)

8. Pre-negotiated Incoterms® 2020 contracts

9. Dedicated Risk Mitigation

10. 100% payment security via SourcifyChina escrow
11. 48-hour dispute resolution (vs. industry avg. 21 days)
12. Factory performance dashboards updated weekly

“Using SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our blanket sourcing cycle from 11 weeks to 9 days. Zero quality rejections in 14 months.”
— CPO, Top 3 EU Home Textiles Brand (2025 Client Testimonial)

---

CALL TO ACTION: SECURE YOUR 2026 SUPPLY CHAIN IN <60 SECONDS

Stop losing revenue to unvetted suppliers. With blanket demand projected to grow 6.2% YoY (Textile Intelligence 2026), delays now risk Q1 2026 inventory gaps.

✅ Your next step is risk-free and immediate:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “2026 Blanket Pro List Request – [Your Company]”
→ Receive free access to 5 vetted factories + QC protocol samples within 4 business hours.

1. WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent needs:
   → Get same-day factory shortlists with live production floor videos.

Why act now?
– Pro List slots fill 30 days before peak sourcing season (Jan 15, 2026)
– First 10 requesters this week receive complimentary air freight audit ($1,200 value)

---

“In 2026, speed without verification is supply chain suicide. SourcifyChina delivers both.”
— Alexandra Chen, Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina

Your 2026 blanket sourcing cycle starts here.
📧 [email protected] | 📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
All factories undergo quarterly re-verification. Data current as of Q4 2025.

---