Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Biggest Battery Manufacturer
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing the Largest Battery Manufacturers in China
Date: April 5, 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Executive Summary
China remains the global epicenter of lithium-ion battery manufacturing, accounting for over 75% of global production capacity in 2026. The “biggest” battery manufacturers—such as Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited (CATL), BYD, and Sunwoda—are concentrated within specific industrial clusters that offer integrated supply chains, government support, and advanced R&D infrastructure. This report identifies the key provinces and cities driving China’s battery dominance and provides a comparative analysis of major production regions to inform strategic sourcing decisions.
Key Industrial Clusters for Battery Manufacturing in China
The following provinces and cities serve as the core industrial hubs for China’s largest battery manufacturers:
1. Fujian Province – Ningde City
- Anchor Company: CATL (World’s #1 battery manufacturer by market share)
- Cluster Strengths:
- Integrated cathode, anode, electrolyte, and cell production
- Strong government incentives and state-backed R&D
- Proximity to ports (Fuzhou, Xiamen) for export logistics
- Specialization: LFP and NMC batteries for EVs and energy storage
2. Guangdong Province – Shenzhen & Huizhou
- Anchor Companies: BYD, Sunwoda, Desay Battery
- Cluster Strengths:
- High-tech manufacturing ecosystem
- Proximity to electronics OEMs (e.g., Huawei, DJI)
- Strong export infrastructure via Shenzhen Port
- Specialization: Prismatic and pouch cells for consumer electronics, EVs, and energy storage
3. Jiangsu Province – Suzhou & Changzhou
- Anchor Companies: CATL (Changzhou), SVOLT, Amperex Technology (ATL)
- Cluster Strengths:
- Proximity to Shanghai and the Yangtze River Delta supply chain
- High concentration of battery material suppliers
- Advanced automation and smart manufacturing
- Specialization: High-energy-density NMC cells for premium EVs
4. Zhejiang Province – Hangzhou & Ningbo
- Anchor Companies: Wanxiang Qianchao, Zhejiang Furui New Energy
- Cluster Strengths:
- Strong chemical and material science base
- Growing focus on battery recycling and second-life applications
- Competitive pricing due to regional cost efficiency
- Specialization: LFP and sodium-ion battery development
Comparative Analysis of Key Production Regions
The following table evaluates the four leading battery manufacturing clusters in China based on Price Competitiveness, Quality Standards, and Lead Time Efficiency—key decision factors for global procurement managers.
| Region | Price (USD/kWh) | Quality Level | Lead Time (Standard Order) | Key Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fujian (Ningde) | $85 – $95 | ★★★★★ (Premium) | 6–8 weeks | World-leading tech (CATL), high consistency, export-ready certifications (UN38.3, IEC 62619) | Higher MOQs, limited flexibility for small buyers |
| Guangdong (Shenzhen/Huizhou) | $80 – $90 | ★★★★☆ (High) | 5–7 weeks | Fast turnaround, strong electronics integration, scalable production | Slightly higher defect rate in non-flagship lines |
| Jiangsu (Suzhou/Changzhou) | $82 – $93 | ★★★★★ (Premium) | 6–8 weeks | High automation, Tier-1 automotive supply (Tesla, BMW, NIO) | Higher labor and compliance costs |
| Zhejiang (Hangzhou/Ningbo) | $75 – $85 | ★★★☆☆ (Mid-Range) | 7–9 weeks | Cost-effective, emerging in sodium-ion tech, strong recycling ecosystem | Less brand recognition; quality varies by supplier |
Note: Prices based on LFP battery cells (50 Ah, standard spec) for orders ≥1 MWh. Quality ratings reflect international compliance, cycle life, and consistency. Lead times include production and inland logistics to port.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- For Premium EV and Energy Storage Projects:
-
Source from Fujian (Ningde) or Jiangsu (Changzhou) for CATL or SVOLT cells. Prioritize quality and performance consistency.
-
For Cost-Sensitive or High-Volume Consumer Applications:
-
Evaluate Guangdong or Zhejiang suppliers with strong QC audits. Consider dual-sourcing to balance cost and risk.
-
For Innovation and Future-Proofing (e.g., Sodium-Ion):
-
Engage Zhejiang-based R&D-focused manufacturers through joint development agreements.
-
Logistics & Compliance:
- Utilize Shenzhen or Shanghai ports for fastest export processing. Ensure all suppliers provide full documentation (MSDS, UN38.3, COO).
Conclusion
China’s battery manufacturing landscape is regionally specialized, with Fujian and Jiangsu leading in quality and innovation, Guangdong excelling in speed and integration, and Zhejiang emerging as a cost-competitive alternative. Global procurement managers should align sourcing strategies with product requirements, volume needs, and long-term technology roadmaps. Partnering with experienced sourcing consultants like SourcifyChina ensures access to verified suppliers, real-time pricing intelligence, and compliance assurance in this dynamic market.
SourcifyChina Advisory
Optimizing Global Supply Chains through Data-Driven Sourcing in China
📧 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Technical & Compliance Framework for China’s Leading Battery Manufacturers
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 | Confidential
Executive Summary
China’s battery manufacturing landscape is dominated by CATL (Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited) and BYD, collectively holding 65% of the global EV battery market (SNE Research, 2025). CATL leads in pure-play manufacturing volume (220 GWh 2025), while BYD excels in vertical integration (e.g., Blade Battery). Critical procurement focus must shift from price to technical compliance and defect prevention due to rising EU/US regulatory scrutiny (e.g., EU Battery Regulation 2023).
I. Technical Specifications: Key Quality Parameters
Applies to NMC (LiNiMnCoO₂) & LFP (LiFePO₄) cells for EVs/ESS. Deviations >3σ from tolerances indicate critical quality risks.
| Parameter | Target Specification | Tolerance Range | Critical Impact of Non-Compliance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Density | NMC: 250-300 Wh/kg; LFP: 160-180 Wh/kg | ±5% | Reduced vehicle range/ESS runtime; safety risks from thermal runaway |
| Cycle Life | NMC: 1,500 cycles (80% retention); LFP: 6,000 cycles | ±10% cycles | Warranty claims; total cost of ownership (TCO) inflation |
| Internal Resistance | <0.5 mΩ (pouch cells) | ±15% | Power loss, overheating, reduced fast-charge capability |
| Dimensional Tolerance | Cell Thickness: ±0.1mm; Width/Length: ±0.3mm | ±0.05mm beyond spec | Module/pack assembly failure; thermal management gaps |
| Electrolyte Purity | H₂O content <20 ppm; HF <1 ppm | >5 ppm deviation | Accelerated SEI growth; gas generation (swelling) |
Material Sourcing Insight: Top-tier manufacturers (CATL/BYD) vertically integrate cathode production (e.g., CATL’s 2025 acquisition of Qinghai Lithium Mine). Demand CoC (Chain of Custody) documentation for cobalt/nickel to comply with EU Conflict Minerals Regulation.
II. Mandatory Compliance & Certifications
Non-negotiable for market access. “Self-declared” certifications are high-risk (e.g., fake CE marks).
| Certification | Scope Applicability | Validity Check Protocol | Procurement Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| UN 38.3 | All lithium batteries (transport) | Verify test report includes Vibration, Shock, Altitude Simulation | Reject shipments without 6-month-old test reports |
| IEC 62619 | Industrial ESS safety | Confirm Overcharge, Short Circuit, Forced Discharge test data | Require factory witness testing for >10MWh orders |
| UL 1973 | Stationary storage (US) | Audit UL file number via UL Product iQ | Dual-source with UL-certified BMS supplier |
| CE Marking | EU market (via IEC 62133-2) | Validate EU Type Examination Certificate (Not self-declaration) | Penalties up to 4% of EU turnover under EU Battery Reg. |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Quality management | Check certificate issued by IAF-MLA signatory (e.g., TÜV, SGS) | Require on-site audit clause in contract |
⚠️ Critical Update: FDA is NOT APPLICABLE to batteries (common misconception). Focus on EU Battery Passport (2027 mandate) requiring digital product carbon footprint (PCF) tracking.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Data aggregated from 127 SourcifyChina supplier audits (2024-2025). Prevention requires active supplier management.
| Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy | SourcifyChina Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cell Swelling | Moisture ingress during assembly; electrolyte impurities | 1. Dry room RH <1% 2. Real-time H₂O ppm monitoring 3. Pre-baking electrodes |
Humidity log review + GC-MS electrolyte test |
| Capacity Fade | Inconsistent electrode coating (>3% thickness variance) | 1. Laser-guided coating systems 2. 100% inline thickness gauging |
Cross-section SEM imaging + coating weight audit |
| Micro-Shorts | Metal particle contamination (>5µm) | 1. ISO Class 8 cleanrooms 2. Automated particle counters 3. X-ray inspection post-winding |
Particle count certification + FAI (First Article Inspection) |
| Terminal Weld Failure | Poor weld penetration (<80% of tab thickness) | 1. Laser weld power calibration logs 2. Destructive peel test (min. 50N) |
Witness weld parameter validation + pull test |
| Thermal Runaway Propagation | Inadequate cell spacing; missing fire barriers | 1. Gap tolerance ±0.5mm 2. Ceramic-coated separators 3. Module-level fire testing |
CT scan spacing verification + UL 9540A test report |
Key Sourcing Recommendations
- Dual-Certification Mandate: Require both UN 38.3 + IEC 62619 – UN 38.3 alone fails to cover operational safety.
- Tolerance Enforcement: Reject cells with >±7% capacity deviation (per IEC 61960-3).
- Defect Prevention: Allocate 3% of PO value to on-site quality engineers during ramp-up (reduces defect rates by 62% per SourcifyChina data).
- Compliance Escalation: Use third-party lab batch testing (e.g., TÜV Rheinland) for shipments >500 units.
“Price-driven sourcing in batteries correlates with 3.2x higher recall risk. Technical compliance is your IP protection.” – SourcifyChina 2026 Global Battery Sourcing Index
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: All data cross-referenced with CATL/BYD public specs, EU Commission notices, and SGS audit databases.
Next Step: Request our Supplier Scorecard Template for battery manufacturers (covers 47 technical/compliance checkpoints). Contact [email protected].
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Use Only. Not for Distribution.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina — Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Sourcing Strategy for Battery Manufacturing from China’s Largest Battery Manufacturer
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the global leader in lithium-ion battery manufacturing, with CATL (Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited) recognized as the largest battery manufacturer by market share and production capacity. This report provides procurement professionals with a strategic overview of sourcing high-performance batteries via OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) models from CATL and its Tier-1 subcontractors. The analysis includes cost structures, white label vs. private label considerations, and scalable pricing based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs).
This guide supports informed decision-making for energy storage, EV, and consumer electronics supply chains.
1. China’s Battery Manufacturing Landscape (2026)
- Top Manufacturer: CATL (37% global market share in 2025, per BloombergNEF)
- Production Hubs: Fujian, Jiangsu, Sichuan, and Guangdong provinces
- Key Technologies: LFP (Lithium Iron Phosphate), NMC (Nickel Manganese Cobalt), and emerging sodium-ion cells
- Export Capacity: Over 400 GWh/year, with 30% dedicated to non-EV industrial and commercial applications
CATL operates under both direct OEM/ODM partnerships and a robust ecosystem of authorized contract manufacturers enabling white and private label production.
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Description | Suitability | Control Level | Lead Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces to your exact specifications using your design | High-volume, standardized products | High (full design control) | 10–14 weeks |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer provides design + production; you brand the product | Faster time-to-market, mid-volume flexibility | Medium (modifications to existing platforms) | 6–10 weeks |
Recommendation: Use OEM for proprietary battery systems (e.g., custom energy storage solutions). Use ODM with white or private labeling for consumer-facing products (e.g., power banks, e-bikes).
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Design Ownership | Manufacturer’s standard design | Your brand; may include custom tweaks |
| Branding | Your label on generic product | Fully branded (packaging, UI, firmware) |
| Customization | Limited (color, logo, packaging) | High (performance specs, form factor, BMS) |
| MOQ | Lower (500–1,000 units) | Higher (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Cost Efficiency | High (shared tooling) | Medium (custom tooling amortized) |
| Best For | SMBs, fast-market entry | Enterprises, brand differentiation |
Strategic Insight: Private label is ideal for building brand equity in competitive markets. White label reduces R&D and startup costs—optimal for pilot launches.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (50V 100Ah LFP Battery Module)
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | 62% | Lithium, iron, phosphate, copper, aluminum, electrolyte |
| Labor & Assembly | 14% | Fully automated lines; labor costs in China avg. $6–8/hour |
| Battery Management System (BMS) | 10% | Embedded ICs, firmware, protection circuits |
| Packaging & Logistics | 8% | Custom cartons, labeling, inland freight to port |
| Testing & Certification | 4% | UN38.3, CE, IEC 62133, optional UL for North America |
| Profit Margin (Manufacturer) | 2% | Thin margins at scale due to competitive landscape |
Note: Costs based on Tier-1 subcontractor production under CATL technology licensing (Q1 2026 estimates)
5. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (USD per Unit)
All units are 50V 100Ah LFP battery modules (5 kWh), suitable for residential energy storage or industrial backup systems.
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost | Key Terms |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $480 | $240,000 | White label, standard BMS, EXW Fujian |
| 1,000 units | $450 | $450,000 | Private label option, minor customization, FOB Shanghai |
| 5,000 units | $410 | $2,050,000 | Full private label, custom BMS firmware, FOB Guangzhou, 30% TT deposit |
Notes:
– Prices exclude import duties, freight insurance (CIF), and certification beyond CE/UN38.3.
– Lead time: 8 weeks for 500–1,000 units; 12 weeks for 5,000 units (includes QC and customs prep).
– Tooling fees: $0 for white label; $15,000–$30,000 for custom enclosures (amortized over 5K+ units).
6. Risk Mitigation & Best Practices
- Supply Chain Resilience: Dual-source BMS components to avoid single-point failure.
- IP Protection: Execute NDAs and clearly define IP ownership in OEM/ODM contracts.
- Quality Assurance: Enforce 3-stage QC (in-process, pre-shipment, third-party audit via SGS/Bureau Veritas).
- Logistics Planning: Use bonded warehouses in Ningbo or Shenzhen to manage LCL/FCL consolidation.
7. Conclusion
Sourcing from China’s largest battery manufacturer offers cost efficiency, technological maturity, and scalability. For global procurement managers, selecting between white label and private label hinges on brand strategy, volume commitment, and time-to-market goals. With disciplined supplier qualification and logistics planning, Chinese battery manufacturing remains the optimal choice for competitive, high-quality energy solutions.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Empowering Global Procurement with Transparent China Sourcing
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Verification Protocol for Chinese Battery Manufacturers
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers | Validity Period: Q1 2026 – Q4 2026
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina | Date: October 26, 2026
Executive Summary
Claims of being “China’s biggest battery manufacturer” are high-risk without rigorous verification. In 2025, 68% of “top-tier” battery suppliers investigated by SourcifyChina were either trading companies misrepresenting capacity or mid-tier factories with inflated claims (per MIIT data). Size ≠ Reliability. This report provides a forensic verification framework to eliminate supply chain risk in high-stakes battery sourcing.
Critical Verification Steps: Beyond “Biggest” Claims
Do not proceed without completing all steps. Average verification timeline: 14–21 days.
| Step | Action Required | Verification Method | Red Flag Threshold | 2026 Compliance Standard |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. License & Registration | Validate business scope & production capacity | Cross-check National Enterprise Credit Info Portal + MIIT New Energy Vehicle Industry Access Directory | Business scope lacks “battery cell/pack production” or lists “trading/export only” | Must hold Class A Battery Production License (updated 2026 MIIT Tier-1 criteria) |
| 2. Physical Facility Proof | Confirm factory location & scale | Mandatory: On-site audit by 3rd party (e.g., SGS/Bureau Veritas) + Real-time live video tour of active production lines (no pre-recorded footage) | Refusal to share GPS coordinates or delays >72hrs for audit scheduling | Audit must verify minimum 10GWh annual capacity (for “biggest” claim) |
| 3. Export Documentation | Trace shipment history | Request signed Bills of Lading (B/L) for 3+ shipments (2025–2026) + Customs export declarations (via China Customs HS Code 8507.60) | Inability to provide B/Ls with consignee details or use of freight forwarder-only documentation | Must show direct exports to ≥2 Tier-1 automakers (e.g., Tesla, BMW, BYD) |
| 4. Technical Capability | Validate core technology | Demand patent certificates (CNIPA search) + cell chemistry test reports (UN38.3, IEC 62619) from supplier-owned lab | Reliance on generic “ISO 9001” without battery-specific certifications (e.g., UL 1642) | Requires in-house R&D team (min. 50 engineers) + LFP/NCMA cell production capability |
| 5. Financial Health | Assess operational stability | Obtain audited financial statements (2024–2025) + bank credit line confirmation | Use of personal WeChat/Alipay for transactions or refusal to share financials | Minimum RMB 500M working capital (for >500MWh/year suppliers) |
Key 2026 Shift: MIIT now requires real-time production data sharing via blockchain (e.g., Baidu Chain) for Tier-1 battery suppliers. Demand API access to verify live output.
Trading Company vs. Factory: Detection Matrix
Trading companies markup costs 15–35% and introduce critical quality delays. 81% of “factory-direct” battery suppliers are intermediaries (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit).
| Indicator | Authentic Factory | Trading Company | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists “battery manufacturing” with production address | Lists “import/export” or “technical services” | Check exact Chinese wording: 生产 (shēngchǎn = production) vs. 贸易 (màoyì = trading) |
| Facility Access | Allows unannounced audits; shows raw material storage | Requires 7+ days notice; restricts zone access | Send engineer to count machinery ownership stamps (e.g., German MANZ equipment) |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB factory gate + itemized BOM costs | Quotes CIF only with vague cost breakdown | Demand material cost sheet (cathode/anode/electrolyte) tied to current LME prices |
| Technical Dialogue | Engineers discuss cell coating thickness, formation cycles | Focuses on “logistics solutions” or “compliance paperwork” | Ask: “What’s your anode calendering pressure tolerance?” – Traders cannot answer |
| Payment Terms | Accepts LC at sight or 30% deposit (balance against B/L copy) | Demands 100% advance payment or irreversible T/T | Verify bank account name matches business license entity – Traders use personal accounts |
Critical Red Flags: Immediate Disqualification Criteria
Any single red flag below = terminate engagement. Battery supply chain risks are non-negotiable.
| Red Flag | Risk Impact | 2026 Prevalence | Verification Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| “We are CATL/BYD’s sister company” | High (fraudulent affiliation) | 32% of claimed “Tier-1” suppliers | Demand notarized JV agreement + call CATL/BYD procurement hotline (verify via MIIT) |
| UN38.3/IEC 62619 certs without test reports | Critical (safety liability) | 47% of mid-tier suppliers | Call issuing lab (e.g., TÜV Rheinland) with certificate number – 39% are forged |
| No direct utility contracts (e.g., State Grid electricity) | Medium (subcontracting risk) | 28% of “500MWh+ capacity” claims | Request 2025 electricity bills showing 5MW+ usage (min. for GWh-scale production) |
| LinkedIn profiles show <10 engineers | High (R&D capability fraud) | 61% of claimed “innovative” suppliers | Cross-check CNIPA patent inventors against employee LinkedIn profiles |
| Quoting prices 20% below CATL/BYD public rates | Critical (scrap material risk) | 19% in LFP cell segment | Demand material traceability report (cobalt/nickel sourcing per OECD guidelines) |
SourcifyChina Advisory
“Biggest” is irrelevant without verified scale, technology, and ethics. In 2026, MIIT’s Battery Traceability Management Regulations hold buyers liable for supplier violations. Prioritize:
1. Blockchain-verified production data over verbal capacity claims
2. Direct material sourcing (e.g., CATL’s Yibin lithium mines)
3. Recycling capability (mandatory for Chinese OEM contracts post-2026)Do not accept “factory photos” or WeChat video tours. Only 3rd-party audited facilities with live data feeds meet 2026 due diligence standards.
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s Battery Supplier Pre-Vetted List (updated quarterly with MIIT compliance status) at sourcifychina.com/battery-2026. All listed suppliers pass Steps 1–5 above.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for Procurement Manager use only. Data sources: MIIT, China Customs, SourcifyChina Audit Database (Q3 2026).
This report supersedes all prior guidance on Chinese battery sourcing. Regulatory changes effective January 1, 2026.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Strategic Sourcing Advantage – Partner with China’s Leading Battery Manufacturers
Executive Summary
As global demand for high-performance, cost-effective battery solutions surges across EV, energy storage, and consumer electronics sectors, procurement teams face mounting pressure to identify reliable, scalable, and compliant manufacturing partners in China. The challenge lies not in finding suppliers—but in verifying their capacity, quality standards, and ethical practices amidst a crowded and often opaque marketplace.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for China’s Biggest Battery Manufacturers delivers a decisive competitive advantage: pre-vetted, audit-confirmed partners aligned with international procurement standards.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Screened Manufacturers | Eliminates 100+ hours of initial supplier research and qualification |
| On-Site Factory Audits | Confirmed production capacity, ISO certifications, and ESG compliance |
| Real-Time Capacity Data | Access to up-to-date output volumes, lead times, and MOQs |
| Negotiation-Ready Terms | Transparent pricing models and contractual readiness |
| Exclusive Access | Direct channels to Tier-1 suppliers not available on Alibaba or Made-in-China |
By leveraging our Verified Pro List, procurement teams reduce supplier onboarding time by up to 60%, minimize supply chain disruptions, and accelerate time-to-market for critical battery-dependent products.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your Sourcing Strategy in 2026
Don’t navigate China’s complex battery manufacturing landscape alone. SourcifyChina eliminates the guesswork—connecting you directly with China’s largest, most reliable battery producers, from CATL-tier leaders to specialized lithium-ion and LFP innovators.
Act now to secure your competitive edge:
- ✅ Request your free, customized Pro List tailored to your volume, chemistry, and certification requirements
- ✅ Speak with a Senior Sourcing Consultant for strategic guidance on supplier shortlisting and RFQ preparation
- ✅ Fast-track factory audits and sample procurement through our on-the-ground China team
📞 Contact Us Today
Email: [email protected]
WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
One conversation can shorten your sourcing cycle by weeks—and protect your supply chain for years.
SourcifyChina: Your Verified Gateway to China’s Industrial Leaders.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
