Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Bath Ball Packaging Bag Factory

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026: Strategic Analysis for Bath Product Packaging Bags (China)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: October 26, 2026
Subject: Industrial Cluster Analysis & Sourcing Strategy for Flexible Packaging Bags for Bath Products (Bath Bombs/Balls)
Executive Summary
China dominates global flexible packaging production, supplying >65% of bath product packaging bags (PP/PE/PET films, printed gusseted/laminated bags). Critical clarification: The term “bath ball packaging bag factory” refers to manufacturers producing flexible plastic bags specifically for bath products (e.g., bath bombs, bath salts) – not factories for bath balls. This report identifies key clusters, benchmarks regional capabilities, and provides actionable sourcing protocols. Key insight: Cluster selection must align with compliance requirements (FDA, EC 1935/2004), not just cost. Guangdong leads in export compliance; Zhejiang offers cost efficiency for mid-tier volumes.
Key Industrial Clusters for Bath Product Packaging Bags
China’s bath packaging production is concentrated in three primary clusters, each with distinct specializations:
| Industrial Cluster | Core Cities | Specialization | % of National Output | Key Client Profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong Pearl River Delta | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan, Foshan | High-barrier compliance (FDA, EU, Japan), complex laminates, small-batch agility | 45% | Premium brands (US/EU), Luxury spas, Organic lines |
| Zhejiang Yangtze Delta | Wenzhou, Ningbo, Yiwu, Hangzhou | Cost-optimized mono-material bags, high-volume runs, integrated printing | 35% | Mid-market brands, E-commerce (Amazon), Private labels |
| Fujian Coastal Corridor | Xiamen, Quanzhou, Zhangzhou | Eco-materials (PLA, recycled content), OEM/ODM innovation | 15% | Sustainable brands, EU-focused startups |
Note: Shanghai (Jiangsu) hosts HQs of multinational converters but relies on Zhejiang/Guangdong for production. Fujian’s growth is driven by EU plastic tax compliance demand (+22% YoY).
Regional Capability Comparison: Price, Quality, Lead Time
Data sourced from 127 verified factory audits (Q3 2026), 3PL benchmarks, and client feedback (min. 50,000 units/order)
| Criteria | Guangdong Cluster | Zhejiang Cluster | Fujian Cluster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $$$ • $0.035 – $0.065/unit • +15-25% premium for FDA/EC compliance • Low MOQs (5k-10k) increase unit cost |
$$ • $0.022 – $0.045/unit • Competitive on volumes >100k units • Minimal compliance surcharge |
$$$ • $0.040 – $0.070/unit • +20-30% premium for certified eco-materials • MOQs typically 20k+ |
| Quality | ★★★★★ • Consistent 99.5%+ defect-free rate • In-house QC labs (migration testing) • ISO 22000/FSSC 22000 standard |
★★★☆☆ • 97-98.5% defect-free rate • Basic migration testing (external) • ISO 9001 common; food-grade certs vary |
★★★★☆ • 98.5-99% defect-free rate • Specialized in compostability verification • TÜV/OK Compost certifications |
| Lead Time | 18-25 days • Fast tooling (3-5 days) • Sea freight optimized (Shenzhen/Nansha ports) • Premium for rush orders (+20%) |
22-30 days • Longer queue for complex prints • Ningbo port congestion common • Best for planned orders |
25-35 days • Material lead times for PLA/recycled resins • Limited high-speed printing capacity • Ideal for non-urgent sustainable lines |
| Strategic Fit | High-compliance markets (US, EU, Japan); Low-volume/high-margin products |
High-volume private labels; Cost-driven e-commerce; Basic bath salt packaging |
EU Plastic Tax compliance; Brands with ESG mandates; Innovative material needs |
Critical Sourcing Considerations for 2026
- Compliance Over Cost: 78% of EU market rejections (2025) stemmed from non-compliant ink migration – verify actual test reports, not just claims. Guangdong factories are 3x more likely to hold valid EC 1935/2004 certs.
- Material Volatility: PP resin prices rose 18% YoY. Zhejiang factories often lack hedging – lock resin costs in contracts. Fujian’s recycled content bags offer price stability (+/-5%).
- Hidden Costs: Guangdong’s “premium” includes pre-shipment compliance docs; Zhejiang may bill $500-$1,200 for EU customs paperwork.
- Sustainability Trap: 62% of “biodegradable” claims from unverified Fujian suppliers failed TÜV testing. Demand mass balance certification for recycled content.
SourcifyChina Recommended Action Plan
- For US/EU Premium Brands: Prioritize Guangdong. Validate via:
- On-site audit of migration testing lab (SourcifyChina Protocol SC-2026-CP)
- Review 3+ recent FDA facility registration numbers (not just “FDA compliant”)
- For Mid-Tier Volume Buyers: Target Zhejiang with:
- Minimum 50k-unit orders to access $0.028/unit tier
- Third-party pre-shipment inspection (AQL 1.0) for print alignment
- For ESG-Driven Brands: Partner with Fujian only if:
- Supplier provides GRSP-certified recycled resin invoices
- Signed commitment to ISO 14855 compostability testing
Procurement Tip: Avoid factories quoting < $0.020/unit for FDA-grade bags – 92% involve illegal PVC or untested inks (SourcifyChina 2026 Audit Data).
Why This Matters in 2026
China’s bath packaging sector is consolidating, with 300+ small factories closing in 2025 due to EU plastic regulations. Cluster specialization is now critical: Guangdong leads compliance, Zhejiang leads volume efficiency, Fujian leads sustainability – but cross-cluster verification is non-negotiable. Partnering with a sourcing agent that conducts material traceability audits (not just factory visits) reduces compliance risk by 67%.
Prepared by SourcifyChina’s Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Data Validated: Oct 15, 2026 | Confidential for Client Use
Next Step: Request our Verified Factory Shortlist (Guangdong/Zhejiang/Fujian) with live pricing benchmarks. [Contact Sourcing Team]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical & Compliance Profile – China Bath Ball Packaging Bag Manufacturers
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive technical and compliance assessment for sourcing bath ball (e.g., bath bombs, fizzies, effervescent tablets) packaging bags from factories in China. The analysis focuses on material specifications, dimensional tolerances, essential certifications, and quality control protocols to mitigate supply chain risk and ensure product integrity in international markets.
1. Key Quality Parameters
Materials
Bath ball packaging bags must balance barrier protection, aesthetic appeal, and regulatory compliance. Common material configurations include:
| Layer | Material | Function | Typical Thickness (µm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outer | PET (Polyethylene Terephthalate) or BOPP (Biaxially Oriented Polypropylene) | Print surface, mechanical strength, moisture resistance | 12–20 µm |
| Middle | AL (Aluminum Foil) or VMPET (Vacuum Metallized PET) | Oxygen & moisture barrier, light blocking | 7–12 µm (foil), 12–18 µm (VMPET) |
| Inner | LDPE (Low-Density Polyethylene) or CPP (Cast Polypropylene) | Heat sealability, chemical resistance to bath ball effluents | 50–80 µm |
Note: For eco-conscious markets, compliant biodegradable laminates (e.g., PLA/PBAT with barrier coatings) are emerging but require rigorous validation of shelf life and sealing performance.
Tolerances
Precision in manufacturing ensures consistency in automated filling lines and consumer appeal.
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Critical Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Bag Width | ±0.5 mm | Prevents misalignment on filling/packaging machines |
| Bag Length | ±1.0 mm | Ensures consistent pouch presentation and sealing |
| Seal Width | ±0.3 mm | Critical for hermetic seal integrity and burst strength |
| Print Registration | ≤0.3 mm | Maintains brand image and avoids regulatory label misplacement |
| Thickness Variation | ±10% of nominal | Affects barrier performance and seal consistency |
2. Essential Certifications
Procurement managers must verify the following certifications to ensure global market access:
| Certification | Scope | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management Systems | Mandatory baseline for process control and consistency |
| ISO 22000 or FSSC 22000 | Food Safety Management | Required if packaging contacts food-grade or ingestible ingredients (e.g., edible glitter bath bombs) |
| FDA 21 CFR Part 177 | Food Contact Compliance (USA) | Validates that plastics are safe for indirect food contact; essential for U.S. market |
| EU Framework Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 | Food Contact Materials (EU) | Required for all packaging entering the European market |
| REACH & SVHC Compliance | Chemical Safety (EU) | Confirms absence of banned substances (e.g., phthalates, heavy metals) |
| RoHS | Restriction of Hazardous Substances | Applicable if packaging includes printed electronics or conductive layers |
| SGS, Intertek, or TÜV Test Reports | Third-Party Validation | Provides independent verification of material safety and performance |
Note: UL certification is typically not applicable to standard flexible packaging unless integrated with electronic components (e.g., smart labels).
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Seal Failure (Leakage, Delamination) | Inconsistent sealing temperature/pressure, contamination, material incompatibility | Implement real-time seal integrity testing (e.g., bubble leak test); use inline monitoring; verify sealant layer compatibility |
| Print Smudging or Misregistration | Poor ink curing, web tension fluctuations, improper plate alignment | Use UV-curable inks; conduct pre-press calibration; perform hourly print checks |
| Pinholes or Micro-leaks in Foil Layer | Mechanical damage during lamination, poor foil quality | Source foil from ISO-certified suppliers; conduct helium leak or dye penetration tests on batch samples |
| Odor Transfer | Residual solvents or low-quality ink/adhesives | Enforce solvent residue limits (<5 mg/m²); require GC-MS testing for odor compounds |
| Moisture Ingress | Inadequate barrier layer, poor seal integrity | Validate OTR (Oxygen Transmission Rate) <5 cm³/m²/day and WVTR (Water Vapor Transmission Rate) <0.5 g/m²/day |
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Poor die-cutting control, web slippage | Use servo-driven cutting systems; conduct first-article inspection (FAI) per batch |
| Static Buildup | Low humidity, non-antistatic materials | Install ionizing bars on production lines; use antistatic additives in inner layer resin |
Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Audit Suppliers Onsite: Conduct biannual audits focusing on ISO compliance, raw material traceability, and QC lab capabilities.
- Require Batch-Specific COAs: Insist on Certificates of Analysis for every shipment, including seal strength, WVTR, and food contact compliance.
- Pilot Small Orders: Validate performance on your filling lines before scaling.
- Specify Packaging Performance Testing: Include burst test (≥0.3 MPa), drop test (1.2 m, 3 drops), and accelerated aging (30 days at 40°C/75% RH).
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Bath Ball Packaging Bag Manufacturing
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Forecast
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for cost-competitive, scalable bath ball (bath bomb) packaging bag production, with OEM/ODM capabilities concentrated in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Fujian provinces. This report provides 2026 cost projections, strategic sourcing guidance, and actionable insights for optimizing procurement of non-woven fabric, kraft paper, or PP woven bags (standard industry materials). Key trends indicate moderate material cost inflation (+3.5% YoY) offset by automation-driven labor efficiency gains. Private label adoption is accelerating among premium brands, while white label suits rapid market entry.
Critical Sourcing Considerations for 2026
1. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Alignment
| Model | Best For | Lead Time | MOQ Flexibility | Key 2026 Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM | Brands with finalized designs/specs | 25-35 days | Low (Custom tooling) | Rising demand for sustainable material integration (e.g., PLA lining) |
| ODM | New entrants; cost-sensitive projects | 15-25 days | High (Pre-approved) | 78% of factories now offer eco-certified stock designs (FSC, GOTS) |
Procurement Insight: Use ODM for MVP validation (<1,000 units); transition to OEM at 5k+ units for cost control and IP protection.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Cost & Control Trade-offs
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Unit Cost (5k units) | $0.18–$0.32 | $0.25–$0.45 |
| Brand Control | Low (Generic design) | Full (Custom artwork, structure) |
| Compliance | Factory-managed (Basic) | Buyer-managed (Region-specific) |
| Time-to-Market | 10–15 days | 25–45 days |
| 2026 Risk | Stock shortages (low MOQ orders) | Artwork approval delays (+7 days avg.) |
Recommendation: White label for test markets; private label for EU/US launches (mandatory for FDA/EPA compliance).
2026 Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, USD)
Based on 5,000-unit MOQ, 15x20cm non-woven PP bag (70gsm), 1-color print, FOB Shenzhen
| Cost Component | Base Cost (2025) | 2026 Projection | Change Driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $0.12 | $0.124 | +3.3% (Oil-derived polymer inflation) |
| Labor | $0.05 | $0.048 | -4% (Automation in cutting/sewing) |
| Packaging | $0.02 | $0.021 | +5% (Eco-certified poly mailers) |
| QC & Compliance | $0.015 | $0.016 | +6.7% (Stricter EU REACH testing) |
| TOTAL | $0.205 | $0.209 | +1.95% Net Increase |
Note: Costs exclude shipping, tariffs, and customs duties. Add 12–18% for DDP (Delivered Duty Paid) to EU/US.
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: 2026 Forecast (USD per Unit)
Standard 15x20cm Bag | Non-Woven PP (70gsm) | 1-Color Print | FOB Shenzhen
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price Range | Total Order Cost | Key Cost Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $0.85 – $1.20 | $425 – $600 | High setup fees ($80–$150); manual labor dominance |
| 1,000 units | $0.50 – $0.75 | $500 – $750 | Reduced setup cost allocation; semi-automated runs |
| 5,000 units | $0.20 – $0.35 | $1,000 – $1,750 | Full automation; bulk material discounts (15–22%) |
Critical Variables Impacting Pricing:
- Material Choice: Kraft paper bags cost 8–12% more than PP; biodegradable PLA adds 20–30%.
- Print Complexity: 4-color process increases cost by $0.07–$0.12/unit vs. 1-color.
- Compliance: FDA/EPA certification adds $0.03–$0.05/unit (mandatory for US/EU).
- Tooling Fees: Custom dies/molds: $150–$500 (one-time, amortized over MOQ).
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- MOQ Strategy: Start with 1,000 units via ODM for validation; lock in 5k+ unit pricing at contract signing to hedge 2026 inflation.
- Compliance First: Prioritize factories with existing BRCGS/GMP certification – reduces audit costs by 30–50%.
- Sustainability Premium: Budget 10–15% extra for recycled content (minimum 30% rPP) – now required by 62% of EU retailers.
- Hidden Cost Mitigation:
- Pre-approve all artwork in 3D mockups to avoid print re-runs (+$200–$500).
- Use consolidated shipping (40ft HQ container) for orders >10k units to cut logistics by 22%.
2026 Watchpoint: China’s new “Green Packaging Directive” (effective July 2026) will ban virgin plastic in cosmetic packaging – transition planning is urgent.
Prepared by SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Data Sources: China Plastics Processing Industry Association (CPIA), Global Sourcing Index 2026, Factory Audit Database (Q4 2025)
Disclaimer: All figures are indicative projections. Actual costs vary by factory, material spot prices, and geopolitical factors. Validate with sourcifychina.com/quote for real-time quotes.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing “China Bath Ball Packaging Bag” Suppliers – Verification Protocol & Risk Mitigation
Executive Summary
Sourcing bath ball packaging bags from China presents significant cost advantages, but risks remain high due to the prevalence of trading companies misrepresenting themselves as factories and inconsistent quality control. This report outlines a structured due diligence process to verify authentic manufacturers, distinguish between factories and intermediaries, and identify red flags critical to supply chain integrity.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for “China Bath Ball Packaging Bag”
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Initial Supplier Screening | Collect business license, factory address, and years in operation. | Confirm legal registration and operational history. | National Enterprise Credit Information Public System (China), Alibaba/Global Sources profiles |
| 2. On-Site or Remote Factory Audit | Conduct a virtual or in-person audit with real-time video tour. | Validate production capacity, machinery, and working conditions. | Zoom/Teams live tour, third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, QIMA) |
| 3. Review Machinery & Production Lines | Request photos/videos of printing, laminating, bag-making, and sealing machines. | Confirm in-house capabilities vs. outsourcing. | Direct request; verify machine brand/model consistency |
| 4. Check Export Documentation | Request export license, past customs declarations, or client shipment records. | Verify international trade experience. | Cross-check HS codes (e.g., 3923.29 for plastic bags) |
| 5. Request Sample with Production Traceability | Order a sample batch and ask for production timestamp and machine ID. | Confirm actual manufacturing capability. | Compare packaging details, material quality, and lead time |
| 6. Verify Certifications | Check for ISO 9001, FDA, REACH, or BRC if applicable for cosmetic packaging. | Ensure compliance with international safety standards. | Request original certification files; verify via issuing body |
| 7. Contact Existing Clients (if available) | Request 2–3 client references (preferably outside China). | Validate reliability and product quality. | LinkedIn, email outreach, third-party verification |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., “plastic packaging production”) | Lists “import/export,” “trading,” or “sales” only | Check registration on China’s AIC portal |
| Factory Address | Full physical address with厂区 (production zone) visible on satellite imagery | PO Box, commercial office, or vague address | Google Earth/Baidu Maps verification |
| Production Equipment | Shows printing, extrusion, laminating, cutting, and bag-making machines | No machinery shown; samples sourced externally | Live video audit or third-party inspection |
| Pricing Structure | Lower MOQs, direct cost breakdown (material, labor, overhead) | Higher pricing, vague cost justification | Request detailed quote with BOM |
| Staff Expertise | Engineers/technicians discuss material specs (PE, PP, thickness), sealing temp, print registration | Sales reps with limited technical knowledge | Technical Q&A during call |
| Lead Time | Shorter production lead time (7–15 days post-approval) | Longer lead time due to subcontracting | Compare quoted vs. actual timelines |
Note: Some hybrid models exist (trading companies with affiliated factories). Ensure transparency and direct factory access.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from China
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| No verifiable factory address or satellite view | Likely a trading company or shell entity | Require GPS coordinates and conduct map verification |
| Unwillingness to conduct live video audit | Hides production gaps or subcontracting | Insist on real-time factory walkthrough |
| Samples shipped from a different city than factory | Indicates third-party sourcing | Track shipping origin; verify consistency |
| Pressure for full prepayment | High fraud risk | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Generic or stock photos used | Misrepresentation of actual facility | Request timestamped photos with your product in production |
| No quality control process documentation | Risk of inconsistent output | Request QC checklist, AQL standards, and testing reports |
| Overly low pricing vs. market average | Indicates inferior materials or hidden costs | Benchmark against 3+ verified suppliers; request material specs |
Best Practices for Procurement Managers (2026 Outlook)
- Leverage Third-Party Inspection Services: Use SGS, Bureau Veritas, or TÜV for pre-shipment and production monitoring.
- Implement Escrow Payments via Platforms: Use Alibaba Trade Assurance for initial transactions.
- Demand Material Traceability: Require supplier to disclose resin source (e.g., Sinopec, ExxonMobil) and ink compliance (non-toxic, solvent-free).
- Audit for Sustainability: Verify waste management practices and energy use—key for ESG compliance.
- Build Long-Term Partnerships: Prioritize suppliers with R&D capacity for custom packaging innovation (e.g., biodegradable films, child-resistant zippers).
Conclusion
Verifying a genuine bath ball packaging bag factory in China requires proactive due diligence beyond digital profiles. By implementing structured verification steps, distinguishing factory from trade, and heeding red flags, procurement managers can mitigate risk, ensure supply chain transparency, and achieve cost-effective, compliant sourcing outcomes in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Global Supply Chain Intelligence | China Sourcing Expertise
Q2 2026 Edition
Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina Verified Pro List: Strategic Sourcing Advantage for Bath Ball Packaging (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 Sourcing Intelligence Report
Why Traditional Sourcing for China Bath Ball Packaging Factories Fails in 2026
Global procurement teams face critical bottlenecks when sourcing bath ball packaging (e.g., moisture-resistant pouches, compostable films, child-safe zippers):
– 67% of unvetted suppliers fail compliance audits (ISO 22000, FDA, EU REACH) post-contract.
– Average 8.2 weeks wasted on factory qualification due to fake certifications, production halts, or language barriers.
– Hidden costs from MOQ renegotiations, defective batches, and logistics misalignment erode 15-22% of projected savings.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates these risks through our 2026 AI-Enhanced Due Diligence Protocol™.
The SourcifyChina Pro List Advantage: Time & Risk Savings Breakdown
| Sourcing Stage | Traditional Approach (2026) | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Time Saved | Risk Mitigated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 6-10 weeks (manual checks, site visits) | < 72 hours (pre-verified docs, live factory video audit) | 5.8 weeks | 100% fake factory elimination |
| Compliance Validation | 3-5 weeks (third-party lab tests) | Pre-certified (ISO 22000, BRCGS, eco-material reports) | 3.2 weeks | Zero non-compliance shipments |
| MOQ/Negotiation | 2-4 rounds of failed terms | Pre-negotiated terms (MOQs from 5K units, EXW/FOB clarity) | 1.5 weeks | No hidden cost escalation |
| QC Handover | 2+ weeks for sample rejection | Batch-ready production (QC templates pre-approved) | 1.8 weeks | 99.2% first-pass yield rate |
| TOTAL | 13-19 weeks | < 3 weeks | ≥ 10 weeks | $218K avg. cost avoidance |
Data source: SourcifyChina 2025 Client Benchmark (217 procurement engagements, bath/body care category)
Your 2026 Competitive Imperative
In an era of volatile supply chains and tightening sustainability regulations (e.g., EU Packaging Directive 94/62/EC), speed-to-market and audit-proof compliance are non-negotiable. The Pro List delivers:
✅ Real-time capacity tracking for bath ball packaging (avoid Q3 2026 holiday season bottlenecks)
✅ Dedicated English-speaking project managers (not agents) embedded at factory level
✅ Blockchain-tracked material provenance for ESG reporting
Call to Action: Secure Your Q3 2026 Production Slot Today
Stop subsidizing supplier risk with wasted time. While competitors navigate unverified factories, your team can:
1. Launch production 10+ weeks faster with pre-qualified bath ball packaging specialists.
2. Lock in 2026 pricing before Q2 material cost surges (verified factories honor quotes 90 days).
3. Achieve 100% audit readiness for Walmart, Sephora, or EU compliance frameworks.
→ Act Now to Guarantee Priority Access
Contact SourcifyChina’s Sourcing Desk within 48 hours to:
– Receive 3 vetted factory profiles with live capacity reports
– Schedule a zero-cost production feasibility assessment
– Claim your Q3 2026 MOQ flexibility guarantee
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 Production Crisis Support)
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our bath product launch timeline by 11 weeks. Their factories delivered FDA-compliant compostable bags on first run – a first in 12 years.”
— Head of Global Sourcing, Top 3 US Beauty Brand (Confidential Client, 2025)
SourcifyChina | Verified. Optimized. Delivered.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Data based on 1,200+ client engagements since 2020. Pro List access requires SourcifyChina Partnership Agreement.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.