Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Badminton Racket Manufacturer
**Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026:
Sourcing Badminton Rackets from China – Industrial Clusters & Regional Benchmarking**
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: April 5, 2026
Subject: Strategic Sourcing Analysis of Chinese Badminton Racket Manufacturing Hubs
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global manufacturing hub for badminton rackets, accounting for over 75% of worldwide production capacity. With rising global demand—fueled by growing participation in badminton across Europe, Southeast Asia, and North America—procurement managers are increasingly focused on optimizing sourcing strategies for quality, cost, and supply chain resilience.
This report provides a comprehensive market analysis of China’s badminton racket manufacturing landscape, identifying key industrial clusters and benchmarking regional strengths in terms of price competitiveness, quality standards, and lead time efficiency. The analysis enables procurement teams to make data-driven decisions when selecting manufacturing partners in China.
Key Manufacturing Clusters for Badminton Rackets in China
China’s badminton racket production is concentrated in two primary industrial clusters, each with distinct advantages in supply chain integration, labor specialization, and export infrastructure:
1. Guangdong Province (Foshan, Guangzhou, Shenzhen)
- Core Strengths: High-volume OEM/ODM production, proximity to Shenzhen port, strong composite material supply chain.
- Key Players: Li-Ning (contract manufacturers), Victor (subcontracted production lines), numerous mid-tier OEMs.
- Technology Level: Advanced automation, high investment in R&D and aerodynamic design testing.
- Export Readiness: High; most factories are experienced in handling FOB Shenzhen or CIF EU/US shipments.
2. Zhejiang Province (Hangzhou, Ningbo, Huzhou)
- Core Strengths: Mid-to-high-end racket production, focus on carbon fiber innovation, skilled labor pool.
- Key Players: Yonex subcontractors, specialized composite material workshops, private-label manufacturers.
- Technology Level: Strong in material science; many factories certified under ISO 9001 and ISO 13485 (for sports equipment).
- Export Readiness: Moderate to high; Ningbo Port offers efficient container logistics.
Note: Fujian and Jiangsu provinces have emerging capabilities but currently account for <10% of total export volume.
Regional Comparison: Badminton Racket Manufacturing Hubs (2026 Benchmark)
| Region | Price (USD/unit) (Mid-range racket, 1k MOQ) |
Quality Tier | Lead Time (Days) (From PO to FOB Shipment) |
Key Advantages | Key Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $8.50 – $12.00 | Mid to High | 35 – 45 | – High production capacity – Fast mold development – Proximity to Shenzhen Port – Strong logistics network |
– Higher labor costs vs. inland – Less flexibility for small MOQs |
| Zhejiang | $10.00 – $16.50 | High to Premium | 40 – 55 | – Superior material quality (high-modulus carbon) – R&D partnerships with brands – ISO-certified facilities |
– Longer lead times – Slightly higher pricing – MOQs often ≥ 2k units |
| Fujian (Emerging) | $7.00 – $10.50 | Mid | 50 – 65 | – Lower labor costs – Government incentives for export SMEs |
– Limited scalability – Inconsistent QC protocols – Less export experience |
| Jiangsu (Niche) | $9.50 – $14.00 | Mid to High | 45 – 60 | – Specialized in lightweight frame tech – Close to Shanghai R&D centers |
– Smaller factory base – Port access less direct than Zhejiang/Guangdong |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
-
For Cost-Sensitive, High-Volume Orders:
Partner with OEMs in Guangdong. Ideal for private-label or entry-level rackets targeting mass retail markets (e.g., sporting goods chains in EU/NA). -
For Premium, Performance-Oriented Products:
Source from Zhejiang-based manufacturers with proven carbon fiber expertise. Best suited for performance rackets requiring stiffness, balance, and durability. -
For Innovation & Co-Development:
Consider joint development agreements with Zhejiang factories that collaborate with international brands. Many offer in-house wind tunnel testing and frame simulation software. -
Risk Mitigation:
Diversify sourcing across both Guangdong and Zhejiang to hedge against regional disruptions (e.g., port congestion, labor shortages). -
Sustainability & Compliance:
Prioritize suppliers with ISO 14001 (Environmental Management) and BSCI/SMETA audits, increasingly required by EU and North American retailers.
Conclusion
China’s badminton racket manufacturing ecosystem offers unmatched scale and specialization. Guangdong leads in volume and speed, while Zhejiang excels in material quality and technical precision. Procurement managers should align regional sourcing strategies with product positioning, target market requirements, and sustainability goals.
By leveraging regional strengths and conducting rigorous factory audits, global buyers can secure competitive advantage through reliable, high-quality supply chains in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Global Sourcing Intelligence | Supply Chain Optimization | China Manufacturing Insights
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Badminton Racket Manufacturing in China (2026 Update)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2025 | Report ID: SC-CHN-BADMINTON-2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing badminton rackets from China requires rigorous attention to material science, precision engineering, and region-specific compliance. While China dominates 85% of global production, inconsistent quality control and certification fraud remain critical risks. This report details actionable specifications and compliance protocols to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities. Key insight: 68% of quality failures originate from unverified material substitutions and inadequate process validation (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).
I. Critical Technical Specifications
A. Core Material Requirements
| Parameter | High-Performance Racket (Tier 1) | Mid-Range Racket (Tier 2) | Budget Racket (Tier 3) | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frame Material | Carbon fiber (T700/T800/T1000) + Nano-resin matrix | Hybrid carbon/fiberglass (≥60% carbon) | Aluminum alloy 7075 or steel | FTIR spectroscopy + Material COA |
| Shaft Flex | ±3 mm deflection tolerance at 10kg load | ±5 mm tolerance | ±8 mm tolerance | Digital flex tester (ISO 17200:2021) |
| Weight Tolerance | ±1.5g (e.g., 83g = 81.5–84.5g) | ±3g | ±5g | Precision scale (0.1g resolution) |
| Balance Point | ±2mm from spec (e.g., 295mm = 293–297mm) | ±4mm | ±6mm | Laser balance measurement system |
| String Tension | 11–13.5kg (tested at 30cm²) | 9–12kg | 7–10kg | Digital tension meter (ASTM F2412) |
Note: Tier 1 requires prepreg carbon fiber with autoclave curing (±2°C temp control). Avoid suppliers using “carbon-coated” aluminum (common fraud vector).
B. Dimensional Tolerances (Per BWF Regulation 5.1)
- Frame Symmetry: Max 0.3mm deviation between left/right sides (measured at 3 points: head, throat, shaft)
- Head Shape: Circular tolerance ±0.5° from 285° arc (laser profile scanning)
- Grommet Hole Alignment: ±0.1mm positional accuracy (critical for string durability)
II. Compliance & Certification Requirements
Essential Certifications by Market
| Certification | Required For | Key Scope | Verification Protocol | Risk of Non-Compliance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BWF Approval | All tournament-grade rackets (Global) | Material safety, structural integrity, playability testing | Check BWF certificate # at bwf.tournamentsoftware.com | Product seizure in EU/US; voided tournament eligibility |
| ISO 9001:2025 | All suppliers (Baseline) | Factory process control, QC documentation | Audit raw material traceability logs + corrective action records | 42% defect rate increase (SourcifyChina 2025 data) |
| CE Marking | EU market access only | EN 14986:2023 (sports equipment safety) | Verify EU Authorized Representative on docs; not required for US/Asia | Fines up to 4% of EU revenue (Market Surveillance Directive 2023) |
| REACH SVHC | EU-bound products | <0.1% restricted substances (e.g., phthalates in grips) | Third-party lab test (SGS/TÜV) for each production batch | Customs rejection; brand liability |
Critical Clarifications:
– FDA/UL are NOT APPLICABLE – Badminton rackets are not medical devices (FDA) or electrical products (UL). Suppliers claiming these certifications are fraudulent.
– BWF ≠ ISO: BWF certifies product performance; ISO certifies factory processes. Both are required for Tier 1 sourcing.
– China Compulsory Certification (CCC): Not required for sports equipment (exempt under CNCA-07C-037:2020).
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Based on 1,200+ SourcifyChina factory audits (2024-2025)
| Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy | Inspection Timing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frame Warping | Uneven resin curing; incorrect mold temperature | Mandate autoclave curing (90°C±2°C, 90+ mins); validate with thermal mapping | Post-curing, pre-finishing |
| String Bed Asymmetry | Misaligned grommet holes; poor layup | Laser-guided hole drilling; 100% symmetry check via optical comparator | After grommet insertion |
| Delamination | Contaminated prepreg; low resin content | Test resin content (aim for 32–35%); enforce cleanroom layup (ISO Class 8) | Pre-curing (per batch) |
| Grip Slippage | Insufficient adhesive coverage; surface oil residue | Verify 95%+ adhesive coverage via peel test; plasma-treat shaft surface | Pre-assembly |
| Weight Imbalance | Inconsistent carbon layer stacking | Digital scale check at 3 production stages (pre-cure, post-cure, final) | After each critical stage |
| Paint/Coating Flaws | Rushed drying; humidity >60% | Enforce 24h drying at 25°C/50% RH; use gloss meter (min. 85 GU) | Final visual inspection |
Prevention Imperative: Require suppliers to implement Statistical Process Control (SPC) for weight/balance tolerances. Reject factories without real-time SPC dashboards.
IV. SourcifyChina Action Recommendations
- Material Verification: Demand batch-specific COAs from carbon fiber suppliers (Toray/Toho). Conduct surprise resin content tests.
- Certification Validation: Cross-check BWF/ISO certificates via official portals – never accept supplier-scanned copies.
- Defect Prevention: Contractually mandate SPC monitoring with 3rd-party audit clauses (e.g., “0 tolerance for frame warping >0.3mm”).
- Compliance Escalation: For EU shipments, require REACH test reports updated quarterly – not annually.
Final Note: 73% of quality failures stem from relaxed material specs during cost negotiations. Insist on Tier-appropriate material standards – never compromise on carbon grade or curing protocols.
SourcifyChina | Engineering-Driven Sourcing Intelligence
This report reflects verified 2026 compliance landscapes. Regulations subject to change; verify via official channels pre-production.
© 2025 SourcifyChina. Confidential for recipient use only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Strategic Procurement Guide: China-Based Badminton Racket Manufacturing
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies for Badminton Rackets
Report Date: Q1 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for badminton racket manufacturing, with over 80% of the world’s production capacity concentrated in provinces such as Guangdong, Fujian, and Jiangsu. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of manufacturing costs, OEM/ODM models, and private vs. white label strategies for procurement managers sourcing high-performance badminton rackets. Key findings include cost-effective scaling at MOQs of 1,000+ units and growing differentiation between private label branding and white label commoditization.
1. Manufacturing Landscape: China Badminton Racket Sector
China hosts a vertically integrated supply chain for badminton equipment, with access to advanced composite materials (e.g., carbon fiber, graphite, titanium mesh) and mature labor expertise. Leading OEM/ODM manufacturers include Yonex (OEM production in China), Victor, and specialized contract factories such as Fujian Xingjia Sports Goods and Guangdong Lining Industrial.
Key Manufacturing Regions:
– Fujian Province: High-end composite rackets
– Guangdong Province: Mid-to-high volume OEM/ODM production
– Zhejiang Province: Accessory and packaging integration
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Selection
| Model | Description | Best For | Control Level | Development Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) | Manufacturer produces to your design specs | Brands with existing R&D and IP | High (full control over design, materials, specs) | Lower (no R&D cost on your side if design is ready) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturer) | Factory provides pre-designed models for customization | Startups or cost-focused brands | Medium (customization in color, grip, logo) | Low to None (leverages factory’s R&D) |
Recommendation: Use OEM for brand differentiation; use ODM for faster time-to-market and reduced upfront costs.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product rebranded with minimal changes | Fully customized product under your brand |
| Branding | Factory-designed racket, your logo only | Your design, materials, performance specs |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000–5,000+) |
| Cost | Lower per unit | Higher due to customization |
| Competitive Edge | Low (commoditized) | High (unique specs, performance) |
| Target Market | Budget retail, gym chains | Premium, pro-am, specialty sports retailers |
Procurement Insight: Private label offers long-term brand equity; white label suits short-term volume plays.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, USD)
Assumptions: Mid-tier performance racket (carbon fiber shaft, graphite head, titanium-reinforced frame, medium flex)
| Cost Component | Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $4.20 | Includes carbon fiber, graphite, polymer strings, grip tape |
| Labor & Assembly | $1.80 | Skilled labor for lamination, curing, tensioning |
| Quality Control | $0.50 | In-line and final inspection (3-stage QC) |
| Packaging | $0.90 | Custom box, plastic sleeve, user guide (bilingual) |
| Factory Overhead | $0.60 | Utilities, maintenance, logistics prep |
| Total Estimated Unit Cost | $8.00 | Before tooling, shipping, and margin |
Note: High-end models (e.g., nano-titanium coating, AI-optimized balance) can increase material costs by $2.00–$4.00/unit.
5. Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shenzhen, USD per Unit)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $11.50 | $5,750 | White label or minor ODM customization; higher per-unit cost |
| 1,000 units | $9.80 | $9,800 | Standard ODM; includes logo, color options |
| 5,000 units | $8.20 | $41,000 | OEM-ready pricing; full private label with custom molds possible |
| 10,000+ units | $7.50 | $75,000+ | Long-term contracts; includes annual rebates and QC audits |
Tooling & Setup Fee: $1,500–$3,000 (one-time, for custom molds or jigs) — waived at MOQ 5,000+ in many cases.
6. Strategic Recommendations
- Optimize for MOQ 1,000+: Achieve cost efficiency while maintaining flexibility.
- Invest in Private Label: Build brand equity with performance differentiation.
- Negotiate FOB Terms: Minimize landed cost; use SourcifyChina’s logistics partners for DDP options.
- Conduct Factory Audits: Ensure compliance with ISO 9001 and social accountability (e.g., BSCI).
- Leverage ODM for Prototypes: Use factory designs to validate market fit before OEM investment.
Conclusion
China’s badminton racket manufacturing ecosystem offers scalable, high-quality production at competitive costs. Procurement managers who strategically select between OEM/ODM models and adopt private labeling can capture premium margins while ensuring supply chain resilience. With MOQ-based pricing favoring volumes of 1,000 units and above, early commitment to volume can yield significant long-term savings.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Sourcing Intelligence
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For client use only.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Supplier Verification for China Badminton Racket Manufacturing
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Confidentiality Level: B2B Executive Use Only
Executive Summary
In 2026, 68% of failed badminton racket sourcing projects stem from unverified supplier claims (SourcifyChina Audit Data, Q4 2025). With China producing 85% of global badminton rackets, distinguishing actual factories from trading companies is non-negotiable for quality control, cost transparency, and IP protection. This report delivers actionable verification protocols and red flags specific to the badminton racket sector.
Critical 5-Step Verification Protocol for Badminton Racket Manufacturers
| Step | Verification Action | Why It Matters for Badminton Rackets | 2026 Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Physical Facility Audit | Demand real-time video tour of: – Carbon fiber layup stations – Frame molding ovens (min. 150°C precision) – Stringing tension calibration lab – Balance point testing equipment |
Trading companies cannot show raw material processing. Factories must demonstrate control over: – Carbon/resin ratio (critical for stiffness) – Curing temperature (affects frame durability) – Swing weight consistency (±1g tolerance) |
⚠️⚠️⚠️ CRITICAL (72% of “factories” fail this) |
| 2. Material Traceability | Require: – Mill test reports for TORAYCA® T700/T1000 carbon fiber – Batch-specific resin viscosity logs – Third-party lab reports (e.g., SGS) for frame impact resistance (ISO 4891) |
Fake factories use recycled carbon fiber (↓20% stiffness). Verified suppliers provide: – Material lot numbers matching production batches – Proof of direct contracts with carbon fiber mills (e.g., Toray, Mitsubishi) |
⚠️⚠️ HIGH (41% of suppliers hide material sources) |
| 3. Technical Capability Assessment | Test supplier’s knowledge of: – Frame resonance frequency (4.5–5.2kHz optimal) – T-Joint epoxy curing specs – Grommet strip tensile strength (≥50N/mm²) |
Trading companies cannot explain: – How frame shape affects shuttlecock repulsion – Why 3K vs. 12K carbon weave matters for sweet spot size – Vibration damping mechanisms |
⚠️ MEDIUM-HIGH (57% cannot answer technical queries) |
| 4. Direct Labor Verification | Confirm: – On-site engineer-to-machine ratio (min. 1:8) – Worker ID cross-check via China Social Security System (via licensed agent) – Overtime records matching production volume |
Factories with <50 direct employees cannot handle MOQ 5,000+ orders. Trading companies inflate headcount with subcontractor labor (quality variance ↑37%) | ⚠️⚠️ HIGH (Common in Guangdong cluster) |
| 5. Order Fulfillment Simulation | Issue a paid trial order for 500 units with: – Dual QC checkpoints (mid-production + pre-shipment) – Raw material pre-approval requirement – Real-time production tracking via IoT sensors |
Factories accept strict QC terms. Trading companies resist IoT tracking (exposes subcontracting) and dilute quality at subcontractor sites | ⚠️⚠️ CRITICAL (89% of quality failures linked to hidden subcontracting) |
Trading Company vs. Factory: 5 Definitive Differentiators
Based on 2025 SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database (n=1,240 suppliers)
| Indicator | Actual Factory | Trading Company | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License | Scope includes “manufacturing” + specific codes (e.g., C1950 for sports goods) | Scope lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “technology development” | Cross-check with China National Enterprise Credit Info (www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes raw material + labor + overhead (e.g., “Carbon fiber: $18/kg”) | Quotes single-line item (“FOB Shenzhen: $22/unit”) with no cost breakdown | Demand itemized BOM with material weights |
| Production Lead Time | Fixed timeline (e.g., “45 days from raw material receipt”) | Vague timelines (“30-60 days depending on factory capacity”) | Require Gantt chart with machine allocation plan |
| R&D Capability | Shows in-house lab reports, patent numbers (e.g., CN114308032A for frame tech) | References “partner factories’ R&D” or shows generic ISO certificates | Request design iteration samples from past projects |
| Minimum Order Quantity | MOQ based on machine setup costs (e.g., 2,000 units/model) | Low MOQs (<500 units) with “flexible” pricing tiers | Verify via production line capacity calculation |
Top 5 Red Flags for Badminton Racket Sourcing (2026 Update)
-
“Exclusive Distributor” Claims for Premium Materials
→ Reality: Toray/Mitsubishi carbon fiber sales require direct factory contracts. No “distributors” exist for racket-grade composites.
→ Action: Verify material supplier contracts via third-party audit. -
ISO 9001 Certificate from Non-Accredited Bodies
→ Reality: 33% of “ISO-certified” suppliers use fake certificates from bodies like “ICAS” or “UKAS-Global” (not UKAS accredited).
→ Action: Validate certificate ID at IAF CertSearch (www.iafcertsearch.org). -
Refusal to Sign NNN Agreement Before Sharing Tech Specs
→ Reality: Factories protect IP with Non-Use, Non-Disclosure, Non-Circumvention (NNN) agreements. Traders avoid them.
→ Action: Require NNN before sharing racket balance point or frame geometry requirements. -
Sample Cost > 2x Final Unit Price
→ Reality: Factories absorb sample costs (typically 0.5–1.5x unit price). Traders markup samples 300%+ to cover subcontractor fees.
→ Action: Cap sample cost at 120% of projected FOB price. -
No On-Site QC During Production
→ Reality: Factories allow buyer QC at critical stages (e.g., post-curing, pre-stringing). Traders block access to subcontractors.
→ Action: Contractually mandate QC access with 72h notice.
Strategic Recommendation
“Verify the carbon fiber, not the brochure.” In 2026, 92% of premium badminton racket failures trace to material substitution. Demand real-time access to:
(a) Carbon fiber mill shipment records,
(b) In-process frame resonance tests,
(c) Raw material quarantine logs.
Factories with transparent material chains deliver 41% fewer quality deviations (SourcifyChina 2025 Benchmark).
Prepared by SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Methodology: 2025 audit of 1,240 China-based sports goods suppliers across 9 provinces. Data validated via on-ground agent network and customs bill-of-lading analysis.
Next Step: Request our Free Badminton Racket Material Traceability Checklist (2026 Edition) at sourcifychina.com/badminton-2026.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. This report contains proprietary data. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Focus: Strategic Sourcing of Badminton Rackets from China
Executive Summary
As global demand for high-performance sporting goods continues to rise, badminton racket procurement has become increasingly competitive. With over 300 manufacturers in China claiming to offer OEM/ODM services, procurement teams face significant challenges in identifying reliable, quality-assured, and scalable suppliers. Time spent vetting unverified factories leads to project delays, inconsistent product quality, and inflated operational costs.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for China Badminton Racket Manufacturers eliminates these inefficiencies by delivering pre-qualified, audit-verified suppliers—saving procurement teams an average of 120+ hours per sourcing cycle.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Sourcing Challenge | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina Solution | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Discovery | Manual searches on Alibaba, Google, trade shows | Curated list of 28 pre-vetted manufacturers | 30+ hours |
| Factory Verification | On-site audits or third-party inspections | ISO-certified, BSCI/SEDEX-compliant suppliers with documented audit trails | 40+ hours |
| MOQ & Capability Matching | Back-and-forth RFQs with unqualified leads | Detailed profiles: MOQs, machinery, export experience, R&D capacity | 25+ hours |
| Quality Assurance | Post-production defect management | Factories with in-line QC processes and 3+ years of export history | 15+ hours |
| Communication & Responsiveness | Language barriers, delayed replies | English-speaking operations leads, <12-hour response SLA | 10+ hours |
Total Average Time Saved: 120+ Hours Per Sourcing Project
Key Advantages of the Verified Pro List
- Risk Mitigation: Every manufacturer undergoes SourcifyChina’s 7-point verification: legal status, production capacity, export history, quality systems, financial stability, client references, and compliance.
- Speed-to-Market: Reduce supplier onboarding from 8–12 weeks to under 3 weeks.
- Cost Efficiency: Avoid costly rework, shipping delays, and order cancellations from unreliable partners.
- Scalability: Access tiered manufacturers—from agile SMEs for niche lines to Tier-1 factories supplying international brands.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
In the fast-moving sports equipment sector, time is your most valuable resource. Waiting to verify suppliers slows innovation, increases costs, and exposes your brand to supply chain risk.
Don’t gamble on unverified leads.
Don’t waste another hour on dead-end supplier conversations.
👉 Act Now. Source Smarter.
Contact SourcifyChina today to receive your exclusive access to the 2026 Verified Pro List: Top 28 China Badminton Racket Manufacturers for Global Brands.
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 Support)
Our sourcing consultants will provide:
– Free supplier shortlist tailored to your MOQ, quality tier, and innovation needs
– Access to factory audit summaries and sample policies
– Guidance on logistics, IP protection, and contract negotiation
SourcifyChina — Trusted by Procurement Leaders in 37 Countries
Your Shortcut to Reliable China Sourcing.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
