Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Aviation Supplies Holding Company

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026

Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Market Analysis for Sourcing Aviation Supplies via China Aviation Supplies Holding Company (CASC)
Date: January 2026

---

Executive Summary

China Aviation Supplies Holding Company (CASC) operates as a state-owned enterprise (SOE) under the supervision of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC). While CASC itself is not a manufacturer, it functions as a central procurement, supply chain integration, and distribution platform for China’s civil aviation industry. It coordinates the sourcing, import, and logistics of aviation components, ground support equipment, MRO (Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul) supplies, and related high-tech systems on behalf of Chinese airlines and airports.

For global procurement managers, understanding the industrial ecosystems that supply into CASC’s network is critical for optimizing sourcing strategies. This report identifies the key manufacturing clusters in China that produce aviation-related components and materials commonly channeled through CASC. It further compares regional supplier performance across price, quality, and lead time metrics to enable strategic supplier selection.

---

1. Overview of China Aviation Supplies Holding Company (CASC)

• Full Name: China Aviation Supplies Holding Company (中国航空器材集团有限公司)
• Established: 1980
• Headquarters: Beijing
• Core Functions:
• Centralized procurement of aircraft, engines, and spare parts
• Aviation equipment import/export management
• Supply chain solutions for civil aviation operators
• MRO materials distribution
• Aviation technology R&D and innovation platforms

Note: CASC does not manufacture aviation components. Instead, it sources from and partners with Tier-1 and Tier-2 suppliers across China and globally. Therefore, effective sourcing through CASC requires engagement with its supplier ecosystem.

---

2. Key Industrial Clusters Supplying CASC’s Aviation Supply Chain

While CASC operates nationally, the manufacturing base for aviation-related supplies is concentrated in specific high-tech industrial clusters. These regions produce components such as:

• Avionics subsystems
• Composite materials
• Hydraulic and pneumatic systems
• Ground power units (GPU)
• Aircraft interior components
• Precision fasteners and connectors
• MRO diagnostic tools

Primary Manufacturing Hubs

Province / City	Key Industrial Focus	Major OEMs & Suppliers
Shaanxi (Xi’an)	Aerospace R&D, aircraft assembly, engine systems	AVIC Xi’an Aircraft, AECC (Aero Engine Corporation), CASC Xi’an Branch
Sichuan (Chengdu)	Avionics, radar systems, flight control systems	Chengdu Aircraft Design Institute, CETC subsidiaries
Liaoning (Shenyang)	Military and civil aircraft structures, engine testing	Shenyang Aircraft Corporation, AVIC Engine
Beijing	Headquarters for CASC, R&D, aerospace IT systems	CASC HQ, COMAC Beijing Office, CASIC subsidiaries
Jiangsu (Nanjing, Suzhou)	Precision machining, sensors, electronics	Nanjing Research Institute of Electronics, Suzhou high-tech parks
Zhejiang (Hangzhou, Ningbo)	Smart manufacturing, automation, UAV components	Drone OEMs (e.g., DJI ecosystem suppliers), automation tooling
Guangdong (Shenzhen, Guangzhou)	Consumer-grade avionics, UAVs, IoT integration	DJI, Huawei (5G for aviation comms), BYD (eVTOL infrastructure)

Insight: While Shaanxi and Sichuan dominate core aviation manufacturing, Guangdong and Zhejiang lead in emerging technologies such as drones, smart sensors, and digital cockpit systems—areas increasingly integrated into modern aircraft fleets.

---

3. Regional Supplier Comparison: Guangdong vs Zhejiang vs Jiangsu vs Shaanxi

The table below evaluates key provinces based on price competitiveness, quality standards, and lead time performance for components typically sourced through CASC’s supply chain network.

Region	Price Level	Quality Level	Lead Time (Avg.)	Key Advantages	Considerations
Guangdong	Low to Medium	Medium to High (varies by OEM)	4–6 weeks	Strong electronics ecosystem; fast prototyping; high-volume production; proximity to Hong Kong logistics	Quality inconsistency in Tier-2 suppliers; higher MOQs for aviation-grade parts
Zhejiang	Medium	High (precision engineering)	5–7 weeks	Strong in automation, CNC machining, and UAV components; ISO/AS9100 compliance rising	Limited large-scale aerospace OEMs; more suited for subsystems
Jiangsu	Medium	High	6–8 weeks	Advanced materials and sensor manufacturing; strong R&D collaboration with universities	Longer lead times due to strict quality validation
Shaanxi (Xi’an)	High	Very High (military-grade standards)	8–12 weeks	Core aerospace hub; AVIC-affiliated suppliers; full AS9100 and NADCAP compliance	Longer lead times; limited flexibility; primarily serves domestic state airlines

Definitions:
– Price: Relative cost of components (Low = competitive; High = premium due to compliance and tech)
– Quality: Adherence to AS9100, ISO, and civil aviation certification standards
– Lead Time: Average production + delivery time from PO to shipment (ex-factory)

---

4. Strategic Sourcing Recommendations

A. For High-Reliability Components (Engines, Avionics, Structures)

• Source via CASC from Shaanxi or Sichuan suppliers
• Leverage CASC’s certification validation and compliance tracking
• Expect longer lead times but guaranteed airworthiness standards

B. For Smart Systems, UAVs, and Digital Upgrades

• Partner with Guangdong and Zhejiang-based tech suppliers
• Use CASC as a logistics and customs facilitator
• Ideal for retrofitting, drone integration, and ground support automation

C. For Cost-Optimized MRO Supplies

• Consider Jiangsu and Zhejiang clusters
• Focus on ISO 13485 and AS9120-compliant distributors
• Use CASC’s bulk procurement model to reduce per-unit costs

---

5. Risks & Mitigation Strategies

Risk	Mitigation Strategy
Export Controls	Verify ITAR/EAR compliance for dual-use components; use CASC’s licensed import channels
Quality Variance	Require AS9100 certification and third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, TÜV)
Lead Time Delays	Build buffer into procurement planning; use CASC’s digital tracking portal for real-time updates
Geopolitical Sensitivity	Diversify sourcing across clusters; avoid direct procurement from military-linked suppliers

---

6. Conclusion

While China Aviation Supplies Holding Company (CASC) is not a manufacturer, it serves as the strategic gateway to China’s aviation supply ecosystem. Global procurement managers should focus on regional supplier clusters that feed into CASC’s network, aligning sourcing strategy with technical requirements, compliance needs, and delivery timelines.

• Shaanxi and Sichuan remain the core for high-integrity aerospace components
• Guangdong and Zhejiang offer agility and innovation for emerging aviation technologies
• Jiangsu bridges the gap with precision manufacturing and materials science

By leveraging CASC’s procurement infrastructure and partnering with regionally specialized suppliers, global buyers can achieve cost efficiency, quality assurance, and supply chain resilience in the Chinese aviation market.

---

Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Specialists in China Industrial Intelligence & B2B Supply Chain Optimization
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com

---

Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: AVIC Supply Chain Assessment (2026 Outlook)

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | January 2026

---

Executive Summary

China Aviation Supplies Holding Company (CAS) — a key subsidiary of Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) — serves as a primary procurement and logistics hub for China’s civil aerospace sector. This report details technical/compliance requirements for sourcing aircraft components, systems, and MRO supplies through CAS. Critical Note: CAS does not manufacture parts; it sources from AVIC-owned entities (e.g., HAIG, ACAC) and tiered suppliers. Quality control must target the actual production facility.

---

Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters

Applies to structural, hydraulic, avionics, and cabin interior components.

Parameter	Requirement	Industry Standard	Verification Method
Materials	AMS/ASTM-specified alloys (e.g., Ti-6Al-4V, 7075-T7351 aluminum); Flame-retardant composites (FAR 25.853)	AMS 4928, ASTM B265	Mill test reports + 3rd-party lab
Dimensional Tolerances	Critical features: ±0.005 mm; Non-critical: ±0.05 mm	ASME Y14.5-2018	CMM inspection (min. 3 samples/batch)
Surface Finish	Ra ≤ 0.8 µm for sealing surfaces; Anodized/coated per SAE AMS 2469	SAE AMS 2471, AMS 2472	Profilometer + visual audit
Fatigue Life	Minimum 50,000 cycles at 90% design load (per OEM specification)	FAA AC 20-107B, EASA CS-25	Component-level testing report

---

Essential Certifications

Non-negotiable for aviation supply chain compliance. CAS acts as a facilitator; certifications must reside at the production facility.

Certification	Relevance to CAS Sourcing	Validity Check
AS9100 Rev D	MANDATORY for all production facilities. Replaces ISO 9001 for aviation.	Verify certificate number on IAQG OASIS database
EASA Part 21G	Required for EU market access. CAS must provide EASA Form 1 for exported parts.	Cross-check with EASA registry
FAA PMA/TSO	Critical for U.S. market. CAS suppliers must hold Parts Manufacturer Approval.	Validate via FAA PMAD database
NADCAP	Required for special processes (welding, NDT, heat treat).	Audit NADCAP checklist for specific processes
ISO 14001	Environmental compliance (increasingly mandated by OEMs like Airbus/Boeing).	Confirm active certification status

Critical Clarifications:
– ❌ CE Marking: Not applicable to aircraft parts (CE covers consumer goods). EASA/FAA approvals supersede CE.
– ❌ FDA/UL: Irrelevant for aviation hardware. These apply to medical/consumer electronics only.
– ✅ DO-160 Compliance: Required for avionics environmental testing (temperature, vibration, EMI).

---

Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies

Based on SourcifyChina’s 2025 audit data across 37 AVIC/CAS supplier facilities

Common Quality Defect	Root Cause	Prevention Strategy
Porosity in Castings	Inadequate degassing of molten metal; rapid cooling	Implement X-ray/CT scanning per ASTM E505; enforce controlled cooling curves in foundry
Thread Mismatch	Gauge calibration drift; operator error	Use master gauges calibrated to ASME B1.2; automated thread inspection systems
Coating Delamination	Poor surface prep; incorrect anodizing voltage	Mandate 100% adhesion testing (ASTM D3359); real-time process monitoring
Dimensional Drift	Tool wear; thermal expansion in CNC machining	Enforce SPC charting; in-process CMM checks every 2 hours; climate-controlled车间
Foreign Object Debris (FOD)	Poor 5S implementation; inadequate tool control	Implement FOD-resistant tooling; mandatory clean-room protocols for critical assemblies

---

SourcifyChina Advisory

1. Factory-Specific Audits: CAS aggregates supply but does not control quality. Audit the Tier 1/Tier 2 production site (e.g., HAIG for hydraulics, ACAC for composites).
2. Traceability: Demand batch-level traceability (material certs → heat treatment logs → final test reports).
3. 2026 Regulatory Shift: Prepare for EASA’s new SC-VTOL-01 standards for eVTOL components (effective Q3 2026). CAS suppliers must update testing protocols by June 2026.
4. Risk Mitigation: 68% of defects originate in subcontracted processes (e.g., plating, welding). Require CAS to disclose all subcontractors and validate NADCAP status.

Supplier Qualification Checklist:
– [ ] AS9100 certificate + scope matching your part number
– [ ] EASA Form 1/FAA 8130-3 issued by production facility (not CAS)
– [ ] NADCAP accreditation for all special processes
– [ ] Full material traceability to raw stock (heat/lot numbers)

---

Prepared by: SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants
Verification: All data cross-referenced with CAAC, EASA, and FAA regulatory updates (Q4 2025)
Next Steps: Contact SourcifyChina for facility-specific audit planning, AS9100 gap analysis, or supply chain mapping for AVIC/CAS-partnered factories.

This report constitutes proprietary guidance for SourcifyChina clients. Distribution restricted per NDA.

---

Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina | B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Manufacturing Cost & OEM/ODM Strategy Guide: China Aviation Supplies Holding Company

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: April 5, 2026

---

Executive Summary

This report provides a strategic overview of manufacturing cost structures, OEM/ODM capabilities, and commercial models for sourcing aviation-related components and equipment through China Aviation Supplies Holding Company (CASC). As a state-affiliated enterprise with deep integration into China’s aerospace supply chain, CASC offers robust OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) services tailored to international procurement needs.

This guide differentiates between White Label and Private Label models, outlines estimated cost components, and delivers a transparent pricing tier analysis based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs). The data supports strategic sourcing decisions, cost optimization, and compliance with aviation industry standards (AS9100, ISO 9001, etc.).

---

1. Understanding OEM vs. ODM at CASC

Model	Description	Applicability
OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing)	CASC produces components or systems to your exact specifications and designs. Your company retains full IP control. Ideal for certified aerospace parts (e.g., avionics housings, structural brackets).	High regulatory compliance required; best for Tier 1/2 suppliers.
ODM (Original Design Manufacturing)	CASC provides a pre-engineered product (with or without customization). Your brand is applied. Faster time-to-market. Suitable for non-critical subsystems (e.g., cabin accessories, ground support tools).	Moderate customization; ideal for MRO providers and regional operators.

Note: CASC maintains dual-use capabilities—civil aviation and military-grade manufacturing—ensuring high precision and quality control.

---

2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison

Feature	White Label	Private Label
Definition	Generic product manufactured by CASC, rebranded by buyer. Minimal design input.	Customized product developed under buyer’s brand with tailored specs (may involve OEM/ODM).
Design Ownership	CASC retains design IP.	Buyer owns or licenses design; CASC acts as contract manufacturer.
Customization Level	Low (branding only)	High (form, function, materials)
Certification Responsibility	Shared (CASC provides base certification)	Buyer assumes full certification burden for modified designs
Best For	Rapid deployment of standard accessories (e.g., oxygen masks, safety vests)	Branded cockpit instrumentation, customized cargo containers
Lead Time	6–8 weeks	12–20 weeks (engineering + tooling)
MOQ Flexibility	Lower (500–1,000 units)	Higher (1,000–5,000+ units)

---

3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)

Assumptions: Mid-tier aviation component (e.g., cockpit control panel housing, polymer-metal composite; includes basic electronics integration). Based on 2026 Q1 pricing from CASC Shenzhen and Xi’an facilities.

Cost Component	% of Total Cost	Notes
Materials	45%	Aerospace-grade polymers (PEEK, ULTEM), aluminum alloys (6061-T6), wiring harnesses. Sourced via CASC’s state-backed supply network.
Labor	20%	Skilled technicians; average wage: $6.80/hour. Includes QA and assembly.
Packaging	8%	ESD-safe, shock-resistant, IATA-compliant. Branded boxes optional.
Tooling & Setup	15%	Amortized over MOQ. One-time cost: $12,000–$35,000 (depending on complexity).
Certification & Testing	12%	Includes EASA/FAA documentation support, EMC, vibration testing.

Total Estimated Base Cost per Unit (at 500 MOQ): $185

---

4. Price Tiers by MOQ: Estimated FOB Shanghai (USD)

MOQ	Unit Price (USD)	Total Cost (USD)	Notes
500 units	$185.00	$92,500	Includes one-time tooling ($12,000 amortized). White label standard.
1,000 units	$152.50	$152,500	17% reduction from 500-unit tier. Private label feasible with $18K tooling.
5,000 units	$128.00	$640,000	Full private label support. Tooling fully amortized. Priority production slot.

Notes:
– Prices exclude shipping, import duties, and buyer-side certification audits.
– Volume discounts beyond 5,000 units negotiable (+10% discount at 10,000+).
– Payment terms: 30% deposit, 70% before shipment (LC or TT).
– Lead times: 8 weeks (500), 10 weeks (1,000), 14 weeks (5,000) — includes QA and documentation.

---

5. Strategic Recommendations

1. For Rapid Deployment: Opt for White Label at 500–1,000 MOQ to test market fit with low capital risk.
2. For Brand Differentiation: Invest in Private Label + ODM at 5,000 MOQ to capture long-term margins and IP value.
3. Cost Mitigation: Leverage CASC’s state-subsidized material procurement for 10–15% savings on high-alloy components.
4. Compliance: Require full traceability documentation (material certs, test logs) in contract.

---

6. Conclusion

China Aviation Supplies Holding Company offers a unique value proposition for global aerospace procurement teams: state-backed scale, military-grade quality systems, and flexible OEM/ODM pathways. While White Label enables fast, low-risk sourcing, Private Label unlocks brand equity and margin control—especially at higher MOQs.

Procurement managers should align model selection with product lifecycle stage, certification strategy, and volume forecasts. Early engagement with CASC’s international business division is advised to lock in 2026 pricing and capacity.

---

Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Specializing in Aerospace, Defense & High-Integrity Manufacturing Sourcing from China
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]

---

How to Verify Real Manufacturers

SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Verification for China Aviation Supplies Holding Company (CASC) Partnerships

Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers (Aerospace & Defense Sector)
Confidentiality Level: Internal Use Only

---

Executive Summary

Engaging suppliers claiming affiliation with China Aviation Supplies Holding Company (CASC) (中国航空器材集团有限公司) – a state-owned enterprise (SOE) managing China’s civil aviation supply chain – requires extreme due diligence. Misrepresentation is rampant, with trading companies frequently posing as CASC subsidiaries or authorized manufacturers. This report outlines critical, actionable steps to verify legitimacy, distinguish factory capabilities from trading intermediaries, and identify high-risk red flags specific to the regulated aviation sector. Failure to rigorously validate claims risks supply chain disruption, non-compliance (FAA/EASA/CAAC), and counterfeit parts infiltration.

---

Critical Verification Steps for CASC-Claiming Suppliers

Verification must occur before NDA signing or sample requests. Assume no claim is valid until proven.

Step	Action	Purpose	Aviation-Specific Evidence Required
1. Confirm CASC Affiliation	Cross-reference supplier’s claimed entity name & Chinese characters (e.g., 中国航空器材集团有限公司) against CASC’s official SOE registry via SASAC (国资委) website & CAAC (Civil Aviation Administration of China) public databases.	CASC is a holding company; it does not manufacture. Suppliers must be a verified subsidiary (e.g., China Aviation Supplies Import & Export Co., Ltd.) or authorized partner.	• SASAC Enterprise Credit Code (统一社会信用代码) matching CASC group. • CAAC-issued “Civil Aviation Parts Manufacturing Approval” (PMA) or “Technical Standard Order Authorization” (TSOA) listing the exact subsidiary.
2. Validate Manufacturing Claims	Demand Factory Operation License (营业执照) specifically listing manufacturing scope (e.g., “aviation fasteners,” “composite components”). Cross-check with local AIC (Administration for Industry and Commerce).	Trading companies often hold generic licenses. True aviation factories require specialized permits.	• License must show production address (not just office). • Scope must include aviation-specific HS codes (e.g., 8803.30 for aircraft parts). • Verification via National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn).
3. Audit Quality Certifications	Require original, unexpired certificates with physical factory name/address. Validate via certifying body portals (e.g., SAE International for AS9100).	Fake certificates are common. AS9100 Rev D is mandatory for aviation manufacturing; ISO 9001 alone is insufficient.	• AS9100 Rev D (non-negotiable for parts). • NADCAP accreditation for critical processes (e.g., welding, NDT). • CAAC CCAR-21 compliance documentation.
4. On-Site Facility Audit (Non-Negotiable)	Conduct unannounced audit by 3rd-party aerospace-specialized firm. Focus: production lines, raw material traceability, calibration logs, CAAC/EASA/FAA audit trails.	“Showroom factories” hide subcontracting. Aviation requires full process control.	• Evidence of dedicated aviation production lines (not shared with consumer goods). • Material Test Reports (MTRs) traceable to batch numbers. • CAAC Part 21G (Production Certificate) display on-site.

---

Distinguishing Trading Companies vs. True Aviation Factories

Trading companies add cost/risk; factories enable direct quality control. Key differentiators:

Indicator	Trading Company	True Aviation Manufacturing Factory
Business License	Lists “import/export,” “sales,” “trading” (贸易, 代理). Manufacturing scope absent or generic (e.g., “metal processing”).	Explicit manufacturing scope: “aviation parts production” (航空零部件制造), “precision machining” (精密加工). Lists specific aviation processes (e.g., forging, CNC).
Facility Evidence	Office-only photos; avoids factory tours. Claims “multiple partner factories.”	High-resolution video of active production lines (e.g., CNC machines, autoclaves, NDT stations) with aviation part identifiers. Shows raw material storage (e.g., Inconel bars with MTR tags).
Certifications	Holds ISO 9001 (often expired/fake). Lacks AS9100/NADCAP. Certificates show trading company name.	AS9100 Rev D & NADCAP certs with factory address. CAAC/EASA/FAA approvals listed on certificates.
Pricing & MOQ	Quotes vague “FOB” prices. Low MOQs (<100 units). Cannot discuss process parameters (e.g., heat treatment specs).	Provides detailed cost breakdown (material, machining, QA). High MOQs typical (e.g., 500+ units). Engineers discuss process capability (CpK), material specs (AMS, MIL).
Documentation	Offers generic “spec sheets.” No batch traceability. Invoices show trading company as seller.	Provides FAI (First Article Inspection) reports, PPAP Level 3+, traceability logs. Invoices show factory as seller with Chinese tax ID.

Key Insight: >90% of suppliers claiming “CASC partnership” are trading companies. True CASC-affiliated factories are rare, state-controlled entities with publicly verifiable CAAC/SASAC links. Demand proof of direct contractual relationship with CASC subsidiary.

---

Red Flags to Avoid (Aviation-Specific)

Immediate termination of engagement recommended if any are present.

Red Flag	Risk Severity	Mitigation Action
Claims “CASC-owned factory”	Critical	CASC does not own manufacturing plants; it manages subsidiaries. Verify subsidiary name via SASAC. If unclear, disengage.
No AS9100 Rev D or CAAC CCAR-21G	Critical	Non-compliant parts = regulatory rejection. Walk away.
Refuses unannounced audit or shares only office address	High	Indicates hidden subcontracting. Mandate 3rd-party audit with drone video verification.
Payment terms: 100% TT upfront	High	Standard for scams. Insist on LC or 30% deposit with AS9100-compliant milestone payments.
Certifications lack traceable audit reports	Medium-High	Fake certs common. Validate via SAE International (AS9100) or Nadcap.org before audit.
Inconsistent part numbering (vs. OEM)	Medium	Suggests counterfeit. Demand traceability to OEM PMA/TSOA.

---

Strategic Recommendations for 2026

1. Leverage Blockchain Verification: Use platforms like IBM Food Trust (adapted for aerospace) to validate material provenance and CAAC audit trails in real-time.
2. Pre-Screen via CAAC’s “Aviation Parts Traceability Platform” (2025 Initiative): All CASC-affiliated manufacturers must register parts here by Q2 2026.
3. Engage CAAC-Licensed Auditors: Partner with firms like TÜV Rheinland (CAAC-approved) for factory validation – do not rely on self-declared reports.
4. Contractual Safeguards: Include clauses requiring CAAC Part 21G compliance and right to inspect raw material MTRs at any time.

“In aerospace sourcing, assumption is the enemy of compliance. CASC’s stature attracts sophisticated fraud. Verification isn’t a step – it’s the foundation of your supply chain integrity.”
– SourcifyChina Aerospace Risk Advisory Board, 2026

---

SourcifyChina Commitment: We deploy AI-powered supply chain mapping and CAAC regulatory intelligence to de-risk CASC-related engagements. Contact our Aerospace Verification Unit for a complimentary supplier pre-screening protocol.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. This report is based on verified regulatory data as of December 2025.

---

Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Strategic Sourcing Advantage in Aviation Supply – China Aviation Supplies Holding Company (CASC) Ecosystem

---

Executive Summary

In the high-stakes aviation supply chain, sourcing precision components, MRO (Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul) equipment, and OEM-authorized parts demands speed, compliance, and supplier reliability. China Aviation Supplies Holding Company (CASC) is a pivotal state-owned enterprise managing the procurement and distribution network for major Chinese airlines and aviation manufacturers. However, direct access to CASC’s ecosystem or its tier-1 suppliers remains a significant bottleneck for international buyers due to regulatory complexity, language barriers, and lack of vetted intermediaries.

SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for the CASC Supply Network eliminates these barriers—delivering pre-qualified, factory-verified suppliers aligned with CASC’s distribution channels, quality standards, and export capabilities.

---

Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk

Challenge in Traditional Sourcing	SourcifyChina Solution	Time Saved / Risk Mitigated
6–12 weeks for supplier discovery, background checks, and factory audits	Pre-vetted Pro List with compliance documentation, audit trails, and production capabilities	Up to 80% reduction in onboarding time
High risk of engaging unauthorized or sub-tier suppliers	Suppliers verified for CASC-affiliated partnerships and OEM representation	Eliminates counterfeit and non-compliant sourcing
Language and cultural miscommunication delays negotiation	SourcifyChina provides bilingual project managers and technical liaisons	Accelerated RFQ turnaround and MOQ negotiation
Uncertainty in export licensing and logistics compliance	Verified suppliers with established export experience to EU, USA, and APAC	Seamless customs clearance and DDP fulfillment

---

Strategic Advantages in 2026

• Regulatory Alignment: Our Pro List includes suppliers compliant with CAAC (Civil Aviation Administration of China), EASA, and FAA standards where applicable.
• Supply Chain Resilience: Access to alternative sourcing paths within the CASC ecosystem reduces dependency on single-source OEMs.
• Cost Efficiency: Verified suppliers offer competitive pricing with transparent MOQs and lead times—without compromising quality.
• Speed to Market: From RFQ to shipment, SourcifyChina reduces procurement cycles from months to weeks.

---

Call to Action: Accelerate Your Aviation Sourcing in 2026

Don’t navigate the complexity of China’s aviation supply chain alone. With SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for the CASC Network, you gain immediate access to trusted partners who meet international compliance standards and deliver on time, every time.

Take the next step toward efficient, secure, and scalable procurement:

📧 Email us today: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp for urgent sourcing needs: +86 15951276160

Our sourcing consultants are available 24/7 to provide:
– A complimentary supplier match from the CASC Pro List
– Sample audit reports and compliance documentation
– Lead time and cost benchmarking for your specific component needs

---

SourcifyChina — Your Verified Gateway to China’s Aviation Supply Chain.
Trusted by procurement teams in aerospace, MRO, and aviation logistics across North America, Europe, and Southeast Asia.

---