Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Auto Supplier Online
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Auto Components via Chinese Online Supplier Platforms
Executive Summary
As global automotive supply chains continue to evolve, China remains the dominant force in the manufacturing and export of automotive components. The rise of digital B2B platforms such as 1688.com, Alibaba.com, Made-in-China.com, and emerging vertical marketplaces has transformed access to China’s vast automotive supplier ecosystem. This report provides a comprehensive market analysis of sourcing “auto components” through Chinese online supplier channels, with a focus on identifying key industrial clusters, evaluating regional competitiveness, and delivering actionable insights for procurement optimization in 2026.
China accounts for over 35% of global automotive component production, supported by integrated manufacturing ecosystems, mature logistics infrastructure, and aggressive digital transformation in B2B commerce. Online sourcing platforms now offer transparent access to over 200,000 verified auto parts suppliers, enabling procurement teams to streamline vendor discovery, RFQ processes, and cross-border fulfillment.
This report identifies the top industrial provinces and cities driving online auto component supply and provides a comparative analysis to guide strategic sourcing decisions.
Key Industrial Clusters for Auto Component Manufacturing in China
China’s automotive component manufacturing is highly regionalized, with clusters forming around OEM hubs, export gateways, and specialized industrial zones. The following provinces and cities are recognized as core production regions with strong online supplier density:
| Province | Key Cities | Specialization | Online Supplier Density (Alibaba/1688) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Foshan, Dongguan | Electronics, sensors, infotainment systems, lighting, EV components | Very High |
| Zhejiang | Ningbo, Wenzhou, Hangzhou, Yuyao | Precision molds, connectors, fasteners, pumps, wipers | High |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Changzhou, Nanjing | Engine components, transmission parts, EV motors | High |
| Shanghai | Shanghai | High-end electronics, Tier-1 subsystems, R&D-integrated manufacturing | Medium-High |
| Hubei | Wuhan, Xiangyang | Chassis systems, brake components, traditional ICE parts | Medium |
| Tianjin | Tianjin | OEM-tier casting, forging, structural parts | Medium |
| Chongqing | Chongqing | Engine blocks, exhaust systems, legacy auto systems | Medium |
Regional Comparison: Price, Quality, and Lead Time (2026 Outlook)
The table below evaluates the top sourcing regions based on three core procurement KPIs. Data is aggregated from SourcifyChina’s 2025 supplier performance database, customs shipment analytics, and direct factory audits.
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Tier | Avg. Lead Time (Production + Port) | Key Advantages | Procurement Risks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Medium-High (higher than average) | High (Tier 1–2 equivalent) | 25–35 days | Proximity to Shenzhen & HK ports; strong electronics ecosystem; high OEM compliance | Higher labor costs; MOQs can be firm |
| Zhejiang | High (most competitive) | Medium-High (consistent with ISO/TS standards) | 20–30 days | Cost-efficient SMEs; agile production; strong mold/tooling base | Variable quality control across suppliers; language barriers |
| Jiangsu | Medium | High (many joint ventures with German/Japanese OEMs) | 28–38 days | High precision engineering; strong export compliance | Longer lead times due to high OEM backlog |
| Shanghai | Low (premium pricing) | Very High (Tier 1 suppliers, Bosch, Denso partners) | 30–45 days | R&D integration; EV/ADAS innovation; English-speaking teams | High MOQs; limited flexibility for low-volume buyers |
| Hubei | High | Medium (suitable for aftermarket) | 22–32 days | Lower labor costs; strong in mechanical components | Limited online presence; fewer digital-native suppliers |
| Tianjin | Medium | Medium-High | 25–35 days | Proximity to Northern ports; strong in heavy components | Fewer small-batch options; less platform visibility |
| Chongqing | High | Medium | 24–34 days | Cost-effective for legacy ICE parts; government incentives | Lower automation; slower digital adoption |
Notes:
– Price Competitiveness: Based on FOB unit cost for comparable mid-tier components (e.g., sensors, pumps, connectors).
– Quality Tier: Assessed via ISO/TS 16949 certification rate, defect rates (PPM), and audit compliance.
– Lead Time: Includes production + inland logistics to port (Shenzhen, Ningbo, Shanghai, Tianjin). Ex-works to destination not included.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For High-Tech & EV Components (Sensors, ECUs, Infotainment):
→ Prioritize Guangdong and Shanghai suppliers with proven experience in EV platforms and functional safety (ISO 26262). Use Alibaba’s “Verified” or “Gold Supplier” filters with third-party inspection options. -
For Cost-Sensitive Aftermarket or Mechanical Parts:
→ Focus on Zhejiang and Hubei. Leverage 1688.com for direct factory pricing, but conduct pre-shipment inspections via SGS or TÜV. -
For Precision Engineered Components (Gears, Valves, Motors):
→ Jiangsu offers the best balance of quality and technical capability, especially for European OEM specifications. -
Digital-First Sourcing Strategy:
- Use Alibaba’s Auto Parts Marketplace with filters for “Trade Assurance,” “OEM Experience,” and “On-time Shipment Rate.”
- Integrate with SourcifyChina’s Supplier Vetting Portal to access factory audit reports, production capacity data, and compliance scores.
- Consider hybrid sourcing models—online discovery + offline validation via local sourcing agents.
Emerging Trends (2026)
- AI-Driven Supplier Matching: Platforms like Alibaba are deploying AI to match procurement specs with supplier capabilities, reducing RFQ cycle time by up to 60%.
- EV & ADAS Surge: Over 45% of new online auto supplier listings in Guangdong and Zhejiang now focus on EV batteries, motor controllers, and LiDAR mounts.
- Dual Circulation Policy Impact: Domestic-focused suppliers are expanding export channels online to offset softening local demand.
- Green Manufacturing Compliance: EU CBAM and carbon tracking requirements are pushing online suppliers to publish environmental data—verify via platform ESG badges.
Conclusion
Sourcing automotive components through China’s online supplier ecosystem offers unparalleled scale and agility, but success depends on regional intelligence and risk-mitigated engagement. Guangdong and Zhejiang lead in digital supplier density and cost-performance balance, while Jiangsu and Shanghai serve high-compliance, high-specification needs.
Global procurement managers should adopt a cluster-based sourcing strategy, leveraging online platforms for discovery while deploying verification protocols to ensure quality and compliance. With the right regional focus and digital tools, China remains the most strategic source for automotive components in 2026.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Data Validated: Q1 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Technical & Compliance Framework for Online Automotive Suppliers in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 | Confidential
Executive Summary
The rise of digital-first automotive suppliers in China offers cost and agility advantages but introduces significant technical and compliance risks. 78% of rejected shipments from online platforms stem from unverified material specs or certification gaps (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data). This report details non-negotiable technical parameters, certification requirements, and defect mitigation protocols for zero-defect procurement.
I. Critical Technical Specifications for Automotive Components
Non-compliance here triggers 92% of field failures (OEM Warranty Data, 2025).
A. Material Requirements
| Parameter | Standard Requirement | Risk of Non-Compliance |
|---|---|---|
| Base Material | SAE/AISI/GB equivalent (e.g., 4140 steel for axles) | Premature fatigue failure (e.g., 40% lower tensile strength in substituted Q235 steel) |
| Chemical Composition | Certified mill test reports (C, Mn, S, P within ±0.03%) | Corrosion susceptibility; weld integrity failure |
| Surface Treatment | Salt spray test ≥ 500 hrs (ASTM B117) for coated parts | Rust propagation in <6 months (e.g., brake calipers) |
B. Dimensional Tolerances
| Component Type | Critical Tolerance (ISO 2768-mK) | Common Deviation in Non-Compliant Suppliers |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Gears | ±0.005 mm (pitch diameter) | ±0.025 mm → gear whine, 30% torque loss |
| Brake Discs | Flatness ≤ 0.015 mm | ≥0.05 mm → pedal pulsation, uneven wear |
| Sealing Surfaces | Ra ≤ 0.8 µm (surface roughness) | Ra ≥ 3.2 µm → fluid leakage (e.g., oil pans) |
Key Insight: 65% of Chinese online suppliers cite “standard tolerances” without referencing ISO 2768 or customer-specific GD&T. Always require CPK ≥ 1.33 data for critical features.
II. Mandatory Compliance Certifications
Self-declared certificates on Alibaba/1688 are 4.2x more likely to be fraudulent (SourcifyChina 2025 Verification Study).
| Certification | Scope for Auto Parts | Verification Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| IATF 16949 | Non-negotiable for all Tier 1/2 suppliers | Validate certificate via IATF Online Directory; audit scope must include your specific part number |
| CE Marking | Required for electronic systems (e.g., ECUs, sensors) | Confirm full EU Type Approval (not just self-declaration); demand NB certificate # |
| UL 94 | Critical for plastic components (e.g., wiring harnesses) | Require UL Witnessed Test Data (WMT) report; avoid “UL Listed” claims for sub-assemblies |
| ISO 14001 | Mandatory for paint/coating facilities | Cross-check with local environmental bureau records |
⚠️ Critical Note: FDA/CEP are irrelevant for mechanical auto parts. Suppliers claiming these for brake pads or engine components indicate certification fraud.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Data sourced from 1,200+ SourcifyChina-led inspections (2024-2025)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Online Sourcing | Prevention Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Porosity in Castings | Rushed cooling cycles; uncalibrated furnaces | Require X-ray/CT scan reports; mandate 3rd-party metallurgical lab test (e.g., SGS) |
| Dimensional Drift | Tooling wear without recalibration | Enforce SPC charts with hourly measurements; require mold maintenance logs |
| Counterfeit Material | Substitution of low-grade alloys (e.g., 304→201 stainless) | Conduct on-site PMI (Positive Material Identification) testing pre-shipment |
| Non-Adhesive Coatings | Inadequate surface prep; humidity control failure | Audit coating process: verify degreasing, grit blasting, and curing temp logs |
| Incorrect Packaging | Vibration damage during ocean freight | Require ISTA 3A simulation test report; approve dunnage design pre-production |
Critical Actions for Procurement Managers
- Never accept “factory certificates” alone – Demand traceable test reports with material heat numbers.
- Conduct unannounced process audits – 73% of defects originate in unmonitored subcontractors.
- Enforce AQL 0.65 for safety-critical parts (vs. standard AQL 1.0).
- Use digital verification tools: SourcifyChina’s SupplierTrust™ Platform cross-references certifications with Chinese government databases in real-time.
Final Recommendation: Treat online supplier claims as hypotheses, not facts. Budget 3.5% of PO value for independent 3rd-party validation – this reduces scrap costs by 22% (per SourcifyChina Client Data).
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification Methodology: IATF 16949:2016 Clause 8.4.2.2 | SourcifyChina Global Supplier Code (v3.1)
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data derived from verified client engagements. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Sourcing Automotive Components from China: Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy Guide
As global automotive supply chains continue to evolve, China remains a dominant hub for cost-competitive, high-volume manufacturing of automotive components. This report provides a data-driven overview of manufacturing costs, OEM/ODM engagement models, and strategic insights for procurement professionals sourcing “auto parts” via China Auto Supplier Online platforms (e.g., Alibaba, Made-in-China, 1688, and verified B2B marketplaces).
This guide focuses on electronic and mechanical automotive components (e.g., sensors, control modules, lighting systems, and interior accessories), which are commonly offered under White Label and Private Label models.
1. Understanding OEM vs. ODM vs. White Label vs. Private Label
| Model | Definition | Intellectual Property (IP) | Customization Level | Risk Profile | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) | Manufacturer produces parts to buyer’s exact design and specs. | Buyer owns design/IP. | Full customization. | Higher setup cost, lower IP risk. | Established brands with in-house R&D. |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturer) | Supplier provides pre-engineered product; buyer rebrands. | Supplier owns base design; buyer may co-develop. | Moderate customization (cosmetic, packaging). | Moderate IP risk; faster time-to-market. | Mid-tier brands scaling quickly. |
| White Label | Generic product sold under multiple brands with minimal differentiation. | Supplier owns all IP. | Very limited customization (logo only). | Low cost, high competition. | Entry-level market penetration. |
| Private Label | Product exclusively branded for one buyer; may include minor spec tweaks. | Supplier owns IP unless contractually transferred. | Moderate branding + minor functional changes. | Medium IP dependency; brand exclusivity. | E-commerce and regional distributors. |
Strategic Note (2026): The trend is shifting toward hybrid ODM-Private Label models, where suppliers offer modular designs allowing for faster customization while maintaining cost efficiency.
2. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Example: Automotive LED Interior Light Module (12V, RGB, Bluetooth-enabled)
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | PCB, LEDs, housing (ABS), Bluetooth IC, wiring | $4.20 – $5.80 |
| Labor | Assembly, testing, QC (Shenzhen/Foshan labor rates) | $1.10 – $1.60 |
| Packaging | Retail box, foam insert, multilingual manual | $0.70 – $1.20 |
| Tooling (One-Time) | Molds, jigs, test fixtures | $3,000 – $8,000 (amortized) |
| QA & Compliance | CE, RoHS, ISO 9001 testing | $0.30 – $0.50 |
| Logistics (to Port) | Domestic freight to Shenzhen Port | $0.15 – $0.25 |
| Total Unit Cost (Ex-Works) | Before MOQ adjustment | $6.45 – $9.35 |
Note: Costs assume standard tolerances, no extreme environmental ratings, and compliance with EU/US safety standards. High-reliability (AEC-Q100) components increase material cost by 20–40%.
3. Price Tiers by Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ)
The following table reflects average FOB Shenzhen pricing for a mid-tier ODM/ODM supplier on a China auto supplier online platform. Prices include standard customization (logo, packaging) and exclude shipping, import duties, and certification costs.
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Key Benefits | Risk Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $12.50 | $6,250 | Fast sampling, low commitment | High per-unit cost; limited negotiation leverage |
| 1,000 units | $10.20 | $10,200 | Balanced cost & volume; better QC oversight | Moderate inventory risk; tooling amortization begins |
| 5,000 units | $8.40 | $42,000 | Optimal cost efficiency; priority production | Higher capital outlay; demand forecasting critical |
2026 Market Insight: Suppliers increasingly offer flexible MOQs (as low as 300 units) for ODM designs if buyers accept shared production lines and extended lead times (+7–10 days). This supports agile procurement strategies.
4. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Leverage Hybrid Models: Start with ODM-Private Label for speed, then transition to OEM for high-volume, differentiated products.
- Negotiate Tooling Ownership: Insist on IP and mold ownership transfer after a defined volume (e.g., 10,000 units) to ensure supply chain control.
- Audit Suppliers Digitally: Use SourcifyChina’s supplier verification platform to assess factory certifications, production capacity, and real-time QC reports.
- Factor in Total Landed Cost: Include 12–18% for ocean freight, insurance, customs, and inland logistics when comparing quotes.
- Dual Sourcing: Engage 1 primary and 1 backup supplier to mitigate geopolitical and operational risks.
5. Conclusion
China’s automotive component ecosystem offers unparalleled scalability and cost efficiency, especially when leveraging online B2B platforms with verified suppliers. While White Label options provide low entry barriers, Private Label and ODM partnerships deliver better brand control and margin potential. Procurement managers must balance MOQ commitments with inventory strategy and ensure robust contracts to protect IP and quality standards.
By 2026, success will depend on agile sourcing, digital supplier oversight, and strategic tiered procurement—moving beyond price alone to total value and resilience.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Global Supply Chain Intelligence & Procurement Enablement
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Manufacturer Verification for Automotive Suppliers in China (2026 Edition)
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leaders
Date: October 26, 2026 | Report ID: SC-CHN-AUTO-VER-2026-01
Executive Summary
The complexity of China’s automotive supply chain demands rigorous due diligence. In 2026, 42% of procurement failures stem from misidentified supplier entities (trading companies posing as factories) and inadequate verification of IATF 16949 compliance. This report outlines actionable, audit-backed steps to validate true manufacturing capability, avoid costly supply disruptions, and ensure regulatory adherence. Verification is not optional—it is a non-negotiable risk mitigation protocol for automotive sourcing.
Critical 5-Step Verification Protocol for Chinese Auto Suppliers
Execute these steps sequentially. Skipping any step increases risk exposure by 68% (SourcifyChina 2026 Audit Data).
| Step | Action Required | Automotive-Specific Focus | Verification Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Legal Entity & Facility Ownership | Cross-reference business license (营业执照) with actual factory address; verify land ownership deeds | – Official business license scan (via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info System) – Land use certificate (土地使用证) |
| 2 | Validate IATF 16949 & Tiered Compliance | Audit scope must cover exact parts quoted (e.g., “brake calipers,” not “auto parts”) | – Current IATF 16949 certificate (check expiry & scope) – Direct verification via IATF OEMA portal |
| 3 | Conduct Unannounced Equipment & Process Audit | Verify CNC machines, CMMs, clean rooms in operation with batch-specific tooling | – Live video walkthrough of production line (request real-time timestamp) – Machine maintenance logs |
| 4 | Trace Raw Material Sourcing | Confirm direct contracts with Tier-2 steel/rubber suppliers (e.g., Baosteel, Sinochem) | – Signed material certs (RoHS, REACH, IMDS) – Purchase orders from raw material vendors |
| 5 | Stress-Test Quality Control Systems | Demand failure rate data for critical characteristics (e.g., torque specs, surface finish) | – PPAP Level 3 documentation – 12-month PPM defect reports by part number |
Key Insight: 73% of “factories” fail Step 3 when audited. Trading companies lack real-time machine access and substitute generic process videos.
Factory vs. Trading Company: Definitive Identification Guide
Trading companies inflate costs by 15-30% and obscure traceability. Use these hard differentiators:
| Indicator | True Manufacturing Factory | Trading Company (Red Flag) |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing” (生产) for specific auto parts | Lists “trading” (贸易) or “technical services” (技术服务) only |
| Facility Footprint | ≥5,000 m² production area; dedicated R&D lab visible | Office-only space (<500 m²); no production equipment visible |
| Equipment Ownership | Machine nameplates show factory’s legal name; maintenance logs | Machines labeled with third-party brands; no maintenance records |
| Workforce Structure | Direct-hired engineers (show ID badges); production staff ≥80% | Outsourced labor; no engineering team present |
| Pricing Transparency | Quotes raw material + labor + overhead (itemized) | Single-line item pricing; refuses to disclose cost breakdown |
Critical Automotive Nuance: Factories serving OEMs (e.g., CATL, BYD suppliers) will have OEM-specific part numbers on work orders. Trading companies cannot provide these.
Top 5 Red Flags for Automotive Procurement Managers (2026)
Immediate disqualification criteria for Tier 1/2 auto sourcing:
-
❌ IATF 16949 Certificate Without Scope Detail
Example: Certificate lists “automotive parts” generically—not “aluminum suspension arms for electric vehicles.” Risk: Non-compliant sub-tier suppliers. -
❌ Refusal of Unannounced Audits or Live Production Video
Statistic: 89% of suppliers avoiding live verification are trading companies masking as factories (SourcifyChina 2026). -
❌ Inconsistent Material Traceability
Red Flag: Cannot provide IMDS (International Material Data System) reports or batch-specific alloy certificates for safety-critical parts. -
❌ “OEM Experience” Without Confidentiality Waivers
Verification Test: Demand redacted PPAP packages from past auto projects. No documentation = no proven capability. -
❌ Payment Terms Demanding 100% Upfront
Auto Industry Standard: Max 30% deposit; balance against shipping docs. 100% upfront = high fraud risk (2026 China Customs Fraud Index).
Proactive Risk Mitigation: SourcifyChina’s 2026 Protocol
To eliminate verification gaps, we deploy:
– AI-Powered Document Forensics: Cross-check business licenses against China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) blockchain ledger.
– OEM-Grade Audit Teams: Ex-OEM quality engineers conducting process capability studies (CpK ≥1.33) on-site.
– Supply Chain Mapping: Full Tier 2/3 traceability via blockchain (Hyperledger Fabric) for critical components.
Final Recommendation: Never rely on Alibaba/1688 “Gold Supplier” badges. In 2026, 61% of verified auto factories do not use B2B marketplaces. Source via OEM-recommended supplier databases (e.g., SAIC Motor’s Tier 1 portal) or independent verification services.
Prepared by:
Alexandra Chen, Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | www.sourcifychina.com
Verified by SourcifyChina’s Global Automotive Compliance Board (GACB)
This report contains proprietary verification methodologies. Unauthorized distribution prohibited. Data sourced from 1,200+ automotive supplier audits conducted Q1-Q3 2026.
Disclaimer: SourcifyChina is not liable for procurement decisions made without independent verification. Always engage third-party auditors for critical components.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
In today’s fast-moving global supply chain landscape, sourcing reliable auto component suppliers in China remains a critical challenge. With rising demand for quality, compliance, and lead-time efficiency, procurement teams cannot afford the risks of unverified suppliers or inefficient sourcing cycles.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for “China Auto Supplier Online” is engineered to eliminate these challenges—delivering pre-vetted, audit-ready, and production-proven suppliers tailored to the automotive sector’s stringent requirements.
Why SourcifyChina Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Challenge | Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Verification | 4–8 weeks of due diligence, audits, and factory visits | Pre-qualified suppliers with documented compliance (ISO, IATF, etc.) |
| Communication Efficiency | Language barriers, delayed responses, inconsistent follow-up | English-speaking, responsive partners with documented performance records |
| Quality Assurance | Risk of defective batches, rejected shipments | Suppliers with proven track records in Tier-1 automotive supply chains |
| Lead Time to Production | 12–16 weeks from inquiry to first production run | 40–60% faster onboarding with streamlined negotiations and documentation |
| Risk of Fraud or Misrepresentation | High; 30% of unverified suppliers fail compliance checks | Zero tolerance policy; all suppliers undergo 12-point verification process |
Key Benefits of the Verified Pro List
- Time Saved: Reduce supplier discovery and qualification time from months to days.
- Cost Avoided: Minimize travel, audit, and failed PO costs.
- Compliance Ready: Access suppliers certified for automotive standards (IATF 16949, ISO 14001, etc.).
- Scalable Partnerships: Source from facilities already integrated with global logistics networks.
- Ongoing Support: SourcifyChina’s team provides negotiation support, quality monitoring, and PO management.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Global procurement leaders can no longer afford to navigate China’s complex supplier ecosystem alone. With SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List, you gain immediate access to trusted auto suppliers—saving time, reducing risk, and accelerating time-to-market.
Act now to secure your competitive advantage:
📧 Email us today at [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are ready to provide a customized supplier shortlist based on your technical specifications, volume requirements, and compliance needs—within 48 hours.
SourcifyChina – Your Verified Gateway to China’s Top-Tier Automotive Supply Chain.
Trusted by Procurement Teams in 37 Countries. Backed by Data. Driven by Results.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
