Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Artificial Flowers Factory
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Artificial Flowers Manufacturing Landscape (2026 Forecast)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: January 15, 2026
Confidentiality: SourcifyChina Client Advisory
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for artificial flower manufacturing, supplying ~85% of the world’s volume. While cost pressures and sustainability demands are reshaping the sector, strategic regional specialization offers significant advantages for discerning buyers. This report identifies core industrial clusters, analyzes regional trade-offs, and provides actionable sourcing protocols for 2026. Key trends include automation-driven quality consistency, rising material compliance costs, and consolidation among mid-tier factories. Procurement success now hinges on matching regional strengths to specific product requirements rather than seeking generic “low cost.”
Key Industrial Clusters: Mapping China’s Artificial Flowers Ecosystem
Artificial flower production is concentrated in four primary clusters, each with distinct capabilities:
-
Guangdong Province (Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Foshan)
- Focus: High-end silk/lycra flowers, complex arrangements, export-oriented OEM/ODM.
- Strengths: Proximity to Hong Kong logistics, advanced dyeing/finishing tech, strong design teams, ISO-certified factories. Dominates EU/US luxury & hospitality segments.
- 2026 Shift: Automation adoption (robotic petal assembly) reducing labor dependency; rising focus on eco-certifications (GOTS, OEKO-TEX®) to meet EU Green Deal mandates.
-
Zhejiang Province (Yiwu, Wenzhou, Jinhua)
- Focus: Mass-market plastic/polyester flowers, seasonal decor, wholesale/dropship volume.
- Strengths: Yiwu International Trade Market (world’s largest wholesale hub), ultra-low MOQs, rapid prototyping, vast component ecosystem (stems, wires, foliage). Ideal for e-commerce & discount retail.
- 2026 Shift: Intense price competition driving consolidation; increasing investment in recycled PET materials; stricter enforcement of REACH compliance.
-
Fujian Province (Quanzhou, Jinjiang)
- Focus: Mid-range fabric (polyester/satin) flowers, wedding/event decor, sustainable materials (bamboo fibers, recycled fabrics).
- Strengths: Textile industry synergy, lower labor costs than Guangdong, growing expertise in “eco-artificial” products. Strong in Asian & emerging market exports.
- 2026 Shift: Fastest growth in bio-based polymer R&D government subsidies for green manufacturing; improving quality control systems.
-
Hebei Province (Baoding, Shijiazhuang)
- Focus: Basic plastic flowers, foam arrangements, ultra-budget seasonal items.
- Strengths: Lowest labor/operational costs, high-volume capacity for simple designs. Serves value retail chains & domestic Chinese market.
- 2026 Shift: Significant factory closures due to environmental regulations; limited tech investment; becoming niche for highly price-sensitive, non-complex items.
Regional Comparison: Strategic Sourcing Matrix (2026)
| Criteria | Guangdong | Zhejiang (Yiwu Focus) | Fujian | Hebei |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/Unit) | Premium ($0.80 – $5.00+) | Competitive ($0.30 – $2.50) | Mid-Range ($0.50 – $3.00) | Lowest ($0.15 – $1.20) |
| Quality Tier | ★★★★★ (Consistent luxury; tight QC; <2% defect rate) | ★★★☆☆ (Variable; high volume = higher defect risk; 3-8% defect rate common) | ★★★★☆ (Improving; strong mid-tier; 2-5% defect rate) | ★★☆☆☆ (Basic; inconsistent; 5-15%+ defect rate) |
| Lead Time (w/ QC) | 45-60 days (Complex designs) | 25-40 days (Standard items; rapid market access) | 35-50 days | 30-45 days (But high rework risk) |
| Specialization | Silk, complex arrangements, custom design | Plastic/polyester volume, dropship, seasonal | Fabric flowers, sustainable materials, wedding | Basic plastic, foam bases, ultra-budget |
| Key 2026 Risks | Rising automation costs; stringent EU compliance burden | Market saturation; counterfeit components; REACH non-compliance | Greenwashing risks; inconsistent eco-certifications | Environmental shutdowns; labor shortages; quality unreliability |
| Best For | Luxury brands, hospitality, high-margin retail | E-commerce, discount retail, fast fashion decor | Mid-market retail, eco-conscious brands, Asian markets | Extreme value retail, disposable event decor |
Note: Prices based on 10k-unit MOQ for standard 3-bloom arrangement. Lead times exclude shipping. Quality ratings reflect verified factory capabilities (SourcifyChina audit data).
Critical Sourcing Insights for 2026
- Compliance is Non-Negotiable: EU EUDR (deforestation rules) and US Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) require full supply chain mapping. Action: Prioritize factories with blockchain traceability for plant-based materials (Guangdong/Fujian leaders).
- “Low Cost” ≠ “Low Risk”: Hebei’s price advantage is eroded by defect rates and compliance failures. Action: Factor in total landed cost (rework, returns, compliance penalties).
- Yiwu’s Double-Edged Sword: While ideal for speed/volume, market stalls often act as middlemen. Action: Source directly from Yiwu-adjacent factories with verified production lines (not trading companies).
- Automation = Quality Stability: Guangdong factories using robotic assembly show 40% fewer quality variances. Action: Request proof of automation investment during audits.
- Sustainability as Value Driver: 68% of EU buyers now pay 8-12% premiums for certified eco-materials (SourcifyChina 2025 Survey). Action: Target Fujian for bio-fabrics; Guangdong for recycled silk alternatives.
Strategic Recommendations
✅ For Premium/Luxury Buyers: Partner with Guangdong factories offering integrated design + automation. Demand full material traceability and OEKO-TEX® certification. Budget 15-25% above Zhejiang quotes.
✅ For E-commerce/Volume Buyers: Leverage Zhejiang’s Yiwu ecosystem only with direct factory partnerships. Implement mandatory 3rd-party pre-shipment inspections (AQL 1.0). Prioritize REACH-compliant material declarations.
✅ For Sustainable Brands: Target Fujian for bamboo/recycled fabric flowers. Verify certifications via independent labs (e.g., SGS). Accept slightly longer lead times for genuine eco-advantage.
❌ Avoid Hebei for export unless: (a) Defect rates are contractually capped, (b) Products are ultra-simple, (c) Price sensitivity outweighs all other risks.
SourcifyChina Verification Protocol (2026)
All recommended factories undergo:
1. Deep-Dive Audit: On-site assessment of production lines, QC processes, and raw material sourcing.
2. Compliance Vetting: UFLPA risk screening, EUDR documentation review, chemical testing reports.
3. Capacity Validation: Proof of automation investment (photos/video), utility bills, export records.
4. Sustainability Check: Material certificates verified against supplier invoices (no “paper-only” certs).
Procurement Action: Request our Verified Factory Database: Artificial Flowers (2026) with pre-vetted suppliers by region/specialization. [Contact SourcifyChina Sourcing Team]
Data Sources: SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database (Q4 2025), China National Light Industry Council, EU Market Surveillance Reports, McKinsey Supply Chain Analytics.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for Client Use Only. Unauthorized Distribution Prohibited.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications and Compliance Requirements for China Artificial Flowers Factories
1. Overview
Artificial flowers manufactured in China serve diverse global markets, including home décor, event planning, retail, and commercial staging. Ensuring consistent quality and regulatory compliance is critical for procurement success. This report outlines key technical specifications, quality parameters, essential certifications, and a structured approach to defect prevention when sourcing from Chinese artificial flower manufacturers.
2. Key Quality Parameters
2.1 Materials
| Component | Acceptable Materials | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Petals & Leaves | High-grade polyester (PET), silk, PE (polyethylene), PVC (limited use) | Avoid low-grade PVC due to environmental and health concerns |
| Stems | Wire core (22–28 AWG) with PE or fabric wrap | Wire must be corrosion-resistant; fabric wrap should be tightly wound |
| Adhesives | Non-toxic, solvent-free bonding agents (e.g., EVA-based) | Must comply with REACH and RoHS |
| Dyes & Pigments | AZO-free, non-migrating colorants | Lightfastness rating ≥6 on Blue Wool Scale |
2.2 Tolerances
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|
| Color Matching | ΔE ≤ 2.0 (vs. approved sample) | Spectrophotometer (D65 illuminant) |
| Dimensional Accuracy | ±3 mm (overall height/width) | Caliper & ruler measurement |
| Stem Flexibility | Minimum 180° bend without wire exposure | Manual bend test |
| Seam Alignment | No visible misalignment (>1 mm gap) | Visual inspection under 500 lux |
| Weight Variation | ±5% of sample average | Digital scale |
3. Essential Certifications
Procurement managers should verify that suppliers hold or can provide the following certifications based on target market and application:
| Certification | Purpose | Applicable Markets | Validity & Verification |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Conformity with EU safety, health, and environmental standards | European Union | Required for products sold in EU; verify via EU Authorized Representative |
| REACH & RoHS | Restriction of hazardous substances (e.g., phthalates, heavy metals) | EU, UK, Canada, Japan | Third-party lab test reports (SGS, TÜV) required |
| FDA Compliance | Non-toxic materials for incidental human contact | USA | Applicable if product is in proximity to food or children’s items |
| UL 94 V-2 (Flammability) | Flame resistance for decorative items | USA, Canada, commercial installations | Required for hospitality and public spaces |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System | Global | Audit certificate; verify via IAF database |
| BSCI or SMETA | Social compliance and ethical labor practices | EU, US Retailers | Audit report (valid within 12 months) |
Note: For export to the U.S., ensure compliance with the CPSIA if the artificial flower product is marketed for children.
4. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Measures
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Color Fading / Bleeding | Low-quality dyes, UV instability | Use UV-resistant pigments; conduct 48-hour xenon arc weathering test |
| Wire Exposure on Stem | Poor wrapping tension, thin wire gauge | Enforce minimum 26 AWG wire; inspect wrap density (≥8 wraps/cm) |
| Petals Detaching | Inadequate adhesive application or curing | Implement adhesive bond strength test (≥5 N); ensure 24-hour cure time |
| Dimensional Inconsistency | Manual cutting errors, mold wear | Use CNC dies or injection molds; conduct weekly tooling maintenance |
| Odor Emission | Residual solvents in adhesives or plastics | Require VOC testing (<50 mg/m³); mandate 72-hour off-gassing pre-shipment |
| Misaligned or Crimped Petals | Improper assembly or storage pressure | Train assembly staff; use form-fitting packaging with separators |
| Dust Accumulation on Surface | Static charge during production | Apply anti-static coating; store in humidity-controlled environment (40–60% RH) |
5. Sourcing Recommendations
- Audit Suppliers: Conduct on-site factory audits focusing on QC processes, raw material traceability, and certification validity.
- Sample Validation: Require pre-production samples with full compliance test reports.
- AQL Standards: Enforce AQL 1.5 (Major), 4.0 (Minor) for final random inspections (per ISO 2859-1).
- Packaging: Specify anti-dust polybags, barcoded labeling, and shock indicators for sea freight.
- Sustainability: Prioritize factories using recyclable materials and offering take-back programs.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Global Supply Chain Optimization for Decor & Lifestyle Products
February 2026 Edition – Confidential for B2B Use
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Artificial Flowers Manufacturing in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q3 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for artificial flower manufacturing, offering 30–40% cost savings versus Western/European alternatives. However, strategic supplier selection, MOQ optimization, and label strategy (White Label vs. Private Label) critically impact landed costs and time-to-market. This report provides actionable cost benchmarks, structural insights, and risk-mitigation guidance for 2026 procurement planning.
Key Strategic Considerations: White Label vs. Private Label
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed, generic products with removable tags. | Fully customized product + packaging under your brand. | White Label = Faster launch; Private Label = Brand control. |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate–High (1,000–5,000+ units) | White Label suits test markets; Private Label requires volume commitment. |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days | 30–45 days (design + production) | Private Label adds 2–3 weeks for sampling/approval. |
| Customization Depth | Limited (color/size tweaks only) | Full (materials, shapes, packaging, scents) | Private Label enables premium pricing but higher NRE costs. |
| Hidden Costs | None | $300–$1,500 (molds/dies, artwork setup) | Factor NRE into per-unit cost at low volumes. |
| Best For | Budget launches, seasonal testing, B2B bulk buyers. | Brand differentiation, retail exclusivity, DTC brands. | Recommendation: Start White Label → transition to Private Label at 3K+ units. |
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, USD)
Based on mid-tier polyester/silk blend flowers (25cm stem, 8–10 petals). Excludes shipping, tariffs, QC fees.
| Cost Component | White Label | Private Label | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $0.85–$1.20 | $1.10–$1.65 | Private Label uses premium fabrics (e.g., latex for realism); +25–35% cost. |
| Labor | $0.30–$0.45 | $0.40–$0.60 | Hand-assembly complexity increases with customization. |
| Packaging | $0.10–$0.15 | $0.25–$0.45 | Private Label: Custom boxes, inserts, branding = 2x White Label cost. |
| TOTAL (Ex-NRE) | $1.25–$1.80 | $1.75–$2.70 | NRE fees apply only to Private Label (one-time). |
Critical Note: Material costs are volatile. Silk prices rose 18% in 2025 due to EU sustainability regulations – lock in 6-month contracts with suppliers to mitigate risk.
MOQ-Based Price Tiers (White Label vs. Private Label)
All prices per unit (USD). Assumes FOB Shenzhen. Includes basic QC but excludes shipping/tariffs.
| MOQ | White Label | Private Label | Cost Savings vs. MOQ 500 | Procurement Advice |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $2.10–$2.60 | $2.90–$3.80 | – | Only for urgent trials; avoid for retail (margins collapse). |
| 1,000 units | $1.75–$2.10 | $2.35–$2.95 | 15–20% | Minimum viable for White Label e-commerce. |
| 5,000 units | $1.30–$1.65 | $1.80–$2.25 | 35–40% | Optimal tier: Balances cost, flexibility, and quality control. |
| 10,000+ units | $1.10–$1.40 | $1.55–$1.90 | 45–50% | Requires 90-day lead time; ideal for major retailers. |
Key Variables Impacting Tiers:
– +10–15% cost for latex/realistic-touch materials.
– +20% cost for eco-certified packaging (required for EU/CA markets).
– –5% cost for consolidated shipments (container load vs. LCL).
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Avoid “Too Good to Be True” Quotes: Sub-$1.00/unit bids typically use recycled plastics (high breakage) or skip QC. Verify material specs via lab reports.
- Leverage Hybrid Labeling: Order White Label for 70% of volume (fast turnover) + Private Label for hero SKUs (brand building).
- MOQ Negotiation Tip: Offer 50% upfront payment to reduce MOQs by 20–30% with Tier-1 factories (e.g., 800 units instead of 1,000).
- Tariff Mitigation: For US-bound goods, prioritize suppliers with Vietnam transshipment capabilities to bypass Section 301 tariffs (saves 7.5–25%).
- Quality Non-Negotiables: Mandate AQL 1.0 (critical defects) and 4.0 (minor defects) – 68% of cost-cutting failures stem from relaxed QC standards.
“In 2026, artificial flower margins hinge on strategic volume allocation – not chasing the lowest per-unit cost. Prioritize supplier agility over price.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Next Steps: Request our 2026 Approved Supplier List (ASL) for artificial flowers – pre-vetted for EU REACH, CPSIA compliance, and ethical labor. [Contact Sourcing Team] | [Download Full Cost Model] SourcifyChina: Data-Driven Sourcing for Global Brands Since 2010. Zero Commissions. Zero Margin Markup.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Due Diligence Protocol for Sourcing Artificial Flowers from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
As global demand for high-quality artificial flowers rises across home décor, events, and retail sectors, sourcing directly from Chinese manufacturers offers significant cost and quality advantages. However, the market is saturated with intermediaries and inconsistent suppliers. This report outlines a structured due diligence process to identify legitimate artificial flower factories in China, distinguish them from trading companies, and mitigate procurement risks.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer: 5-Step Verification Framework
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Factory Address | Confirm legal entity status and physical presence | – Verify business license (Business Scope must include manufacturing) – Cross-check with China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site or Remote Factory Audit | Validate production capabilities and infrastructure | – Schedule video audit via Zoom/Teams (request live walkthrough of injection molding, silk cutting, assembly lines) – Engage third-party inspection firms (e.g., SGS, QIMA) for in-person audits |
| 3 | Review Production Equipment & Capacity | Assess scalability and technology maturity | – Confirm ownership of key machinery (e.g., injection molding machines, CNC cutters, dyeing tanks) – Request monthly production capacity (e.g., 500K+ stems/month) and MOQs |
| 4 | Evaluate In-House Design & R&D Capabilities | Ensure customization and innovation capacity | – Request portfolio of proprietary molds or patented designs – Interview lead designer or R&D team |
| 5 | Obtain Client References & Sample Batch | Validate product quality and reliability | – Request 3 verifiable client references (preferably B2B) – Order a pre-production sample batch (assess material quality, colorfastness, durability) |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Criteria | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists “manufacturing” in scope; registered address matches factory site | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” only; address often in commercial district |
| Facility Access | Willing to show production floor, raw material storage, and quality control stations | Reluctant to provide factory access; may redirect to “partner” facilities |
| Pricing Structure | Provides cost breakdown (material, labor, overhead); lower FOB prices | Higher FOB prices; vague cost structure; may outsource quotes |
| Lead Times | Direct control over production schedule; precise timelines | Dependent on third-party factories; less predictable delivery |
| Customization Ability | Offers mold development, material sourcing, and in-house design | Limited to catalog items; may charge high fees for customization |
| Workforce | Employs engineers, machine operators, and QC staff | Staff focused on sales, logistics, and customer service |
✅ Pro Tip: Ask, “Can you show me the machine that produces the petal molds for your PE flowers?” A true factory can demonstrate; a trader cannot.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Artificial Flowers from China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials (e.g., thin PE, non-UV-resistant dyes) or hidden costs | Benchmark against industry averages; request material specs |
| No Physical Address or Refusal to Video Audit | High probability of being a front for multiple suppliers or scam operation | Disqualify supplier; only proceed with verified access |
| Inconsistent Communication or No English-Speaking Manager | Indicates disorganization or lack of international experience | Require dedicated account manager with technical fluency |
| Requests Full Payment Upfront | High fraud risk; no leverage for quality disputes | Insist on 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy or LC terms |
| Claims to Be a “Factory” but Only Shows Catalog Images | Likely a trading company misrepresenting capabilities | Demand real-time video tour of active production line |
| No Compliance Documentation | Risk of customs delays or bans (e.g., phthalates, lead content) | Require test reports (e.g., REACH, RoHS, CA Proposition 65) |
Best Practices for Risk Mitigation
-
Start with Small Trial Orders
Test quality, communication, and logistics before scaling. -
Use Escrow or LC Payments
Protect financial exposure until goods are verified. -
Specify Materials in Contract
Define PE, silk, or latex types; require colorfastness and UV resistance standards. -
Include IP Protection Clause
Prevent unauthorized replication of custom designs. -
Leverage Third-Party Inspections
Conduct pre-shipment inspections (PSI) for every order >$10K.
Conclusion
Identifying a legitimate artificial flower factory in China requires proactive verification beyond online profiles. By applying this 5-step framework, distinguishing operational traits between factories and traders, and heeding critical red flags, procurement managers can secure reliable, high-quality supply chains. Direct factory partnerships, when properly vetted, yield superior cost control, faster innovation, and long-term scalability.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Prioritize suppliers in Yiwu, Zhejiang, and Guangzhou, Guangdong—proven hubs for artificial floral manufacturing with transparent ecosystems.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Premium Artificial Flowers Sourcing in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leaders
Date: January 15, 2026 | Report ID: SC-CH-AF-2026-Q1
Executive Summary: The Critical Time Drain in Artificial Flowers Sourcing
Global procurement teams waste 227 hours annually vetting unverified Chinese artificial flower suppliers (SourcifyChina 2025 Sourcing Efficiency Index). Generic searches for “china artificial flowers factory” yield 1.2M+ results, 68% of which are trading companies, brokers, or non-compliant facilities – directly impacting lead times, quality control, and compliance risk.
Why Manual Sourcing Fails in 2026
| Sourcing Method | Avg. Time to Qualified Supplier | Risk of Non-Compliance | MOQ Flexibility | Quality Failure Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIY Search (Google/Alibaba) | 18.3 weeks | 41% | Limited | 33% |
| SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | 2.7 weeks | <5% | High | 8% |
Data Source: SourcifyChina Client Benchmark (Q4 2025), 87 enterprise procurement teams
How Our Verified Pro List Eliminates 85% of Sourcing Friction
Our AI-verified supplier database for artificial flowers undergoes 7-layer validation:
1. On-Site Factory Audits (ISO 9001, BSCI, OEKO-TEX® certified facilities only)
2. Trade License & Export History cross-verified via Chinese Customs
3. Specialized Capability Screening (silk/polyester/latex production, hand-finishing, custom dyeing)
4. Real-Time Capacity Checks (avoiding overbooked suppliers)
5. Compliance Documentation (REACH, CPSIA, Prop 65 pre-vetted)
6. Performance Tracking (97.4% on-time delivery rate across 2025)
7. Dedicated QC Protocols (3-stage inspection templates included)
Result: Procurement teams secure compliance-ready suppliers in 19 days – not months – with documented 22% cost reduction vs. non-verified sourcing.
Your Strategic Imperative: Secure Q1 2026 Allocation
Artificial flower demand grows at 9.2% CAGR (2024-2028), intensifying competition for certified, scalable suppliers. Top-tier factories now require 120-day lead times for new clients. Delaying supplier qualification risks:
– ❌ Q2 inventory gaps due to extended vetting cycles
– ❌ Margin erosion from emergency air freight
– ❌ Compliance penalties from unverified facilities
✅ Call to Action: Activate Your Verified Supplier Pipeline in 72 Hours
Stop paying the “time tax” on unverified sourcing. Our Pro List delivers:
– Pre-negotiated MOQs starting at 500 units (vs. industry avg. 2,500+)
– Plug-and-play supplier dossiers (factory videos, compliance certs, QC reports)
– Dedicated sourcing engineer for technical specifications
→ Action Required:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “AF PRO LIST 2026 ACCESS”
2. WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent allocation requests (priority response within 2 business hours)
Limited Availability: Only 12 Pro List slots remain for Q1 2026 onboarding. Secure your allocation by January 31, 2026 to guarantee supplier access for Spring 2026 collections.
SourcifyChina – Where Verified Supply Chains Drive Procurement Excellence
Trusted by 387 global brands | $2.1B+ in managed sourcing | 94% client retention rate
✉️ [email protected] | 📱 +86 159 5127 6160 | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com/pro-list-af-2026
This report contains proprietary SourcifyChina data. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
