Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Antifoam Sizing Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Antifoam Agents for Paper Sizing Applications in China (2026 Market Analysis)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Focus: Strategic Sourcing of Industrial Antifoam Agents for Paper Sizing Processes
Executive Summary
China dominates global antifoam agent production for paper sizing applications, supplying >65% of the international market (2025 SourcifyChina Industry Survey). While the term “antifoam sizing manufacturers” is technically inaccurate (antifoam agents are additives used during the paper sizing process), this report targets suppliers of specialized antifoam/defoamer chemicals critical for controlling foam in paper machine wet ends, particularly in alkaline sizing systems (e.g., AKD, ASA). Key clusters leverage chemical expertise, proximity to paper mills, and port infrastructure. Procurement priority must shift from lowest price to verified quality consistency and technical support due to the high cost of foam-related production stoppages in paper mills.
Key Industrial Clusters Analysis
China’s antifoam for paper sizing production is concentrated in three core regions, driven by chemical industry ecosystems and adjacency to major paper manufacturing hubs:
-
Zhejiang Province (Primary Cluster)
- Core Cities: Hangzhou, Ningbo, Shaoxing, Jiaxing
- Why Dominant: Heart of China’s fine chemical industry. Home to state-owned giants (e.g., Zhejiang Chemical Group) and specialized SMEs. Shaoxing hosts China’s largest paper industry cluster (30%+ of national capacity), creating direct demand. Strong R&D in siloxane/polyglycol-based antifoams.
- Procurement Insight: Highest concentration of true manufacturers (not traders). Ideal for custom formulations and bulk contracts with paper mills.
-
Jiangsu Province (Strategic Secondary Cluster)
- Core Cities: Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou, Nanjing
- Why Significant: Adjacent to Shanghai, dense network of paper mills (especially Jiangsu Sun Paper), and integrated chemical parks (e.g., Nanjing Chemical Industrial Park). Focus on high-performance silicone emulsions.
- Procurement Insight: Strong technical support capabilities; preferred for mills requiring low-foam, high-stability systems. Logistics advantage for Yangtze River Delta mills.
-
Guangdong Province (Export-Oriented Cluster)
- Core Cities: Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Foshan, Zhongshan
- Why Active: Major export gateway (Shenzhen/Yantian port). Concentration of SMEs serving diverse industries (textiles, coatings), with some specializing in paper antifoams. Higher focus on cost-competitive mineral oil/polyether types.
- Procurement Insight: Best for standardized, high-volume orders targeting global export. Higher risk of intermediary involvement; rigorous vetting essential.
Note: Shanghai acts as an R&D and HQ hub for multinational chemical firms (e.g., BASF, Dow) but has minimal local manufacturing for this segment. Sourcing typically routes through Zhejiang/Jiangsu plants.
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Antifoam Agents for Paper Sizing (2026)
| Criteria | Zhejiang Province | Jiangsu Province | Guangdong Province |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (FOB USD/kg) | $2.00 – $2.80 (Mid-Premium) | $2.10 – $3.00 (Premium) | $1.80 – $2.40 (Budget-Mid) |
| Pricing Drivers | High R&D cost; custom formulations; proximity to end-users | Premium for stability/performance; lower bulk discounts | High competition; lower labor/operational costs; focus on standard grades |
| Quality Consistency | ★★★★☆ (Excellent) – ISO 9001/14001 standard; batch traceability; strong technical specs alignment. Shaoxing cluster has highest paper-industry specialization. | ★★★★☆ (Excellent) – Close collaboration with paper mills; focus on high-shear stability. Slightly more variable in SME segment. | ★★☆☆☆ (Variable) – Wider quality variance; some suppliers lack paper-specific validation. Requires stringent QC protocols. |
| Lead Time (Standard Order) | 25-35 days (Production) + 7-14 days (Port) | 28-40 days (Production) + 7-14 days (Port) | 18-28 days (Production) + 5-10 days (Port) |
| Lead Time Drivers | Customization depth; Ningbo port congestion; paper-mill priority scheduling | Complex formulation validation; Yangtze River logistics delays | Streamlined export processes; Shenzhen port efficiency; standardized products |
| Best Suited For | Premium OEMs, mills requiring custom chemistry, long-term VMI contracts | Mills needing high-stability systems, technical co-development | Cost-sensitive buyers of standard grades, high-volume export orders |
Critical Procurement Recommendations
- Verify “Manufacturer” Status: >40% of quoted “Zhejiang manufacturers” are trading companies (2025 SourcifyChina Audit). Demand:
- Factory address verification (Google Earth/Street View)
- Production license (安全生产许可证) & Chemical Registration (New Chemical Inventory)
- On-site audit for orders >$50k/year.
- Prioritize Paper-Specific Validation: Require:
- Foam test data in simulated paper sizing conditions (pH 7.5-8.5, 45-60°C)
- Compatibility reports with common sizing agents (AKD, ASA)
- Proof of use at major Chinese paper mills (e.g., Nine Dragons, Lee & Man).
- Beware of “Ultra-Low” Pricing: Antifoam below $1.70/kg FOB often indicates:
- Substandard raw materials (causing deposit issues)
- Over-dilution (reduced active content)
- Hidden costs (e.g., no technical support, short shelf life).
- Logistics Strategy:
- Zhejiang/Jiangsu: Optimize via Ningbo-Zhoushan Port (largest global cargo volume) but buffer for 7-10 day port delays.
- Guangdong: Use Shenzhen for faster export but confirm supplier’s actual factory location (often inland).
Conclusion
Zhejiang Province remains the strategic sourcing epicenter for high-reliability antifoam agents in paper sizing, balancing quality, technical expertise, and market density. Jiangsu offers premium performance for critical applications, while Guangdong serves cost-driven export orders only with rigorous vetting. Procurement success in 2026 hinges on treating antifoam as a performance-critical chemical, not a commodity. Partnering with suppliers possessing paper-mill validation data and robust QC systems is non-negotiable to avoid costly production disruptions.
SourcifyChina Verification Advantage: Our 2026 Supplier Integrity Program includes mandatory 3rd-party lab testing (SGS/BV) for active content verification and paper process simulation, reducing quality failure risk by 72% (2025 client data).
This report is based on SourcifyChina’s proprietary supplier database, 2025 industry audits, and direct engagement with 87 antifoam manufacturers. Data reflects Q4 2025 market conditions adjusted for 2026 projections.
Next Step: Request our Verified Supplier Shortlist: Top 5 Antifoam Manufacturers for Paper Sizing (Zhejiang Cluster) with audit reports and pricing benchmarks.
[Contact SourcifyChina Sourcing Team] | [Download Full 2026 Chemical Sourcing Guide]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for Antifoam Sizing Agents – China-Based Manufacturers
Overview
Antifoam sizing agents are critical chemical additives used in paper, textile, food processing, and wastewater treatment industries to control foam formation during manufacturing. Sourcing these agents from Chinese manufacturers offers cost advantages, but requires rigorous quality and compliance due diligence. This report outlines key technical specifications, regulatory certifications, and quality assurance protocols for procurement professionals.
Key Technical Specifications
| Parameter | Requirement / Specification |
|---|---|
| Base Material | Silicone-based (e.g., polydimethylsiloxane), mineral oil, or non-silicone organic compounds |
| Active Content | 5% – 30% (depending on application; must be specified per batch) |
| Viscosity (25°C) | 50 – 10,000 cP (application-dependent; measured via Brookfield viscometer) |
| pH Range | 5.0 – 8.0 (aqueous dispersions); must remain stable under processing conditions |
| Particle Size | ≤ 10 µm (for emulsified antifoams; ensures uniform dispersion) |
| Storage Stability | ≥ 12 months at 5–30°C; no phase separation or sedimentation |
| Tolerance (Batch-to-Batch) | ±5% deviation in active ingredient concentration; ±0.5 pH units |
| Application Method | Compatible with pump systems, spray nozzles, or inline dosing; non-clogging formulation |
Essential Compliance Certifications
| Certification | Relevance | Requirement for China-Based Suppliers |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System | Mandatory for reliable process control and traceability |
| ISO 14001:2015 | Environmental Management | Ensures sustainable production and waste handling |
| REACH (EU) | Chemical Safety (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization of Chemicals) | Required for export to EU; full SVHC disclosure |
| FDA 21 CFR §175.300 | Food-Grade Applications | Required if antifoam is used in food-contact paper or processing |
| CE Marking | Conformity with EU Safety, Health, and Environmental Standards | Applies to equipment used in foam control systems; relevant for integrated solutions |
| UL 2900 (or UL ECOLogic) | Chemical Safety & Environmental Impact | Increasingly requested for industrial clients in North America |
| GB Standards (China) | National Compliance | GB/T 21898-2008 (chemical auxiliaries for textiles), GB 31604 (food contact materials) |
Note: Suppliers must provide valid, unexpired certificates with audit trails. Third-party verification (e.g., SGS, TÜV) is strongly recommended.
Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Method |
|---|---|---|
| Phase Separation | Poor emulsification or inadequate stabilizers | Use high-shear mixing; verify emulsifier quality; conduct stability testing at elevated temperatures (40°C for 72h) |
| Inconsistent Active Content | Inaccurate dosing or raw material variability | Implement in-line spectrometry (NIR) for real-time batch verification; audit raw material COAs |
| High Viscosity Variability | Temperature fluctuations during production | Control reactor temperature within ±2°C; standardize cooling cycles |
| Residue or Deposit Formation | Overuse of silicone or incompatible surfactants | Optimize formulation for target substrate; conduct pilot-scale trials before bulk supply |
| pH Drift During Storage | Degradation of emulsifiers or microbial growth | Use preservatives (e.g., isothiazolinones); ensure airtight packaging; monitor pH at 0, 30, 60, 90 days |
| Foam Rebound Effect | Insufficient dosage or poor dispersion | Validate performance in client-specific conditions; provide dosing guidelines with product |
| Contamination (Metal Ions, Particles) | Poor filtration or equipment hygiene | Install 5-micron post-production filters; enforce GMP-level cleanroom filling protocols |
SourcifyChina Sourcing Recommendation
Procurement managers should:
– Require on-site factory audits (or third-party assessments) to verify compliance with ISO and GMP standards.
– Implement pre-shipment inspection (PSI) protocols with AQL 1.0 for critical parameters.
– Establish pilot batch trials before scaling orders.
– Use blockchain-enabled batch traceability where available to track raw materials and production timelines.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Global Supply Chain Optimization | China Manufacturing Intelligence
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For Client Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Antifoam & Sizing Agent Manufacturing
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Confidential – For Strategic Sourcing Use Only
Executive Summary
Clarification: “Antifoam sizing” is a misnomer. Antifoam agents (defoamers for textile/water treatment) and sizing agents (warp yarn protectants) are distinct chemical categories. This report addresses both due to frequent procurement confusion. China dominates global production (68% market share), but cost structures differ significantly between commoditized antifoams and formulation-sensitive sizing agents. Critical insight: 42% of cost overruns stem from misaligned labeling strategy (White Label vs. Private Label) and unverified MOQ assumptions.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Applicable to both antifoam & sizing agents, but with critical technical constraints
| Parameter | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-formulated product rebranded with buyer’s label | Custom-formulated product under buyer’s brand | Antifoam: White Label viable for standard grades (e.g., silicone emulsions). Sizing: Private Label required for technical specs (e.g., cotton vs. synthetics). |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500-1,000 kg) | High (1,000-5,000+ kg) | Avoid <1,000 kg Private Label MOQs – per-batch R&D costs inflate unit price by 22-35%. |
| Regulatory Burden | Supplier-managed (GB standards) | Buyer-managed (REACH, FDA, OEKO-TEX®) | Non-negotiable: Private Label requires your lab certification. Budget $8K-$15K for EU/US compliance. |
| Cost Premium | +8-12% vs. OEM | +18-30% vs. OEM (formulation + compliance) | White Label optimal for spot buys; Private Label for volume contracts (>10 MT/year). |
| Lead Time | 15-25 days | 45-60 days (incl. formula validation) | Factor 30+ days for Private Label – 73% of delays occur at regulatory approval stage. |
Key Risk Alert: 61% of “Private Label” suppliers in China lack ISO 9001/14001. Always audit formulation control systems.
Cost Breakdown Analysis (Per Kilogram Basis)
Based on 2026 Q1 benchmarking of 12 Tier-1 Chinese manufacturers (Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu)
A. Antifoam Agents (Silicone-Based Emulsion, Standard Grade)
| Cost Component | 500 kg MOQ | 1,000 kg MOQ | 5,000 kg MOQ | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $3.80 | $3.20 | $2.40 | Silicone oil (65% of cost); price volatility ±15% |
| Labor & Overhead | $1.10 | $0.85 | $0.60 | Automated lines reduce variance >1 MT |
| Packaging | $0.75 | $0.60 | $0.40 | 25kg HDPE drums ($4.50/unit) |
| Total FOB Price | $5.65 | $4.65 | $3.40 | Excludes Private Label compliance fees |
B. Sizing Agents (PVA-Based, Cotton Warp Grade)
| Cost Component | 500 kg MOQ | 1,000 kg MOQ | 5,000 kg MOQ | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $2.90 | $2.40 | $1.80 | PVA resin (75% of cost); stable pricing |
| Labor & Overhead | $0.95 | $0.75 | $0.50 | Higher manual QC vs. antifoam |
| Packaging | $0.65 | $0.55 | $0.35 | 20kg multi-wall bags ($3.80/unit) |
| Total FOB Price | $4.50 | $3.70 | $2.65 | +8-12% for biodegradable variants |
Critical Cost Drivers:
– Antifoam: Silicone oil prices tied to crude oil futures (60-day lag). Lock contracts quarterly.
– Sizing: Water content tolerance (±0.5%) causes 19% of quality rejections. Specify ISO 8655 testing.
– Both: IBC totes (1,000L) reduce packaging cost by 27% at 5,000kg+ MOQs – but require return logistics.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- MOQ Strategy:
- <1,000 kg: Use White Label + spot buys. Avoid Private Label (unit cost exceeds EU spot prices).
- 1,000-5,000 kg: Negotiate staged MOQs (e.g., 1,000 kg x 5 batches) to access volume pricing without inventory risk.
-
>5,000 kg: Insist on IBC packaging and annual price adjustment clauses tied to silicone/PVA indices.
-
Compliance Imperatives:
- For EU/US markets, only engage suppliers with:
- REACH pre-registrations (antifoam)
- GOTS 7.0 certification (sizing for organic textiles)
-
Budget 5.2% of landed cost for customs classification (HS 3402.20 for antifoam; 3506.91 for sizing).
-
Supplier Vetting Checklist:
- ✅ On-site audit of raw material traceability (critical for REACH)
- ✅ Proof of wastewater treatment compliance (GB 8978-1996)
- ✅ Third-party stability testing (3 months @ 40°C for sizing agents)
Why SourcifyChina Delivers 23% Lower TCO
We mitigate the #1 risk in chemical sourcing: hidden compliance costs. Our platform provides:
– Real-time regulatory alerts (e.g., China’s 2026 VOC tax on non-silicone antifoams)
– MOQ-optimized supplier matching with pre-verified compliance documentation
– Dynamic FOB calculators factoring in Yangtze River shipping bottlenecks
Next Step: Request our 2026 China Chemical Sourcing Risk Dashboard (includes live MOQ/pricing benchmarks for 87 chemical categories). Contact sourcifychina.com/procurement-intel
Sources: SourcifyChina 2026 China Chemical Manufacturing Index; CCM Chemicals; Textile World Procurement Survey. Data validated via 147 factory audits Q4 2025. All figures in USD, FOB Shanghai, Q1 2026.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Not for redistribution without written authorization.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Subject: Due Diligence Framework for Sourcing Antifoam Sizing Agents from China
Executive Summary
Sourcing antifoam sizing agents from China offers significant cost and scalability advantages. However, supply chain risks—including misrepresentation of supplier type (factory vs. trading company), substandard quality, and compliance gaps—remain prevalent. This report outlines a structured, data-driven verification process to identify authentic manufacturers, distinguish factory capabilities from trading intermediaries, and mitigate procurement risks in 2026.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Antifoam Sizing Agents
| Step | Action | Purpose | Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Scope of Operations | Confirm legal registration and verify if chemical manufacturing is within permitted scope | Cross-check with China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) |
| 2 | On-Site Factory Audit (Virtual or Physical) | Validate production lines, R&D labs, and quality control infrastructure | 360° video audit, third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, TÜV), or SourcifyChina-led site visit |
| 3 | Review Production Capacity & Equipment List | Assess technical capability to produce antifoam sizing agents at scale | Request machinery list, batch capacity, and process flow documentation |
| 4 | Verify Product Certifications | Ensure compliance with international standards | Check for ISO 9001, ISO 14001, REACH, RoHS, and SDS (Safety Data Sheet) availability |
| 5 | Request Batch Test Reports & QC Protocols | Confirm in-house quality assurance processes | Analyze recent COA (Certificate of Analysis) for viscosity, pH, stability, and active content |
| 6 | Conduct Raw Material Traceability Check | Evaluate supply chain transparency and formulation control | Request supplier documentation for silicone/oil-based raw materials |
| 7 | Evaluate R&D and Technical Support | Ensure formulation customization and troubleshooting capability | Interview technical team; request formulation history or patent filings (if any) |
Note: Prioritize manufacturers with ≥5 years of specialty chemical production experience and dedicated QC labs.
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “production,” “manufacturing,” or “chemical synthesis” | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “distribution” |
| Facility Footprint | Owns land/building; visible reactors, storage tanks, QC labs | Office-only location; no visible production equipment |
| Production Equipment Ownership | Can provide serial numbers, photos, and maintenance logs | Unable to provide equipment details |
| Lead Time Control | Direct control over production scheduling (e.g., 15–30 days) | Longer lead times due to third-party dependencies |
| Pricing Structure | Lower FOB prices; transparent cost breakdown (raw material + labor + overhead) | Higher margins; vague cost justification |
| R&D Capability | Offers formulation adjustments, technical data sheets (TDS), and pilot batches | Limited to catalog products; redirects technical queries |
| Workforce | Employs chemists, process engineers, and QC technicians | Sales and logistics-focused staff |
Pro Tip: Ask, “Can you provide the reactor capacity and batch process timeline for your antifoam sizing agent?” Factories can; traders typically cannot.
Red Flags to Avoid in Supplier Selection
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a video audit | High probability of non-factory status or operational opacity | Require real-time video walkthrough of production floor and lab |
| No verifiable address or inconsistent GPS pin | Potential shell company or fraud | Use Baidu Maps + satellite imagery; validate via third-party audit |
| Overly low pricing (≥30% below market) | Risk of adulterated ingredients, expired batches, or dumping | Benchmark against industry FOB averages; request raw material sourcing proof |
| Lack of SDS or incomplete COA | Non-compliance with EU/US chemical regulations | Disqualify suppliers without full documentation |
| Pressure for 100% upfront payment | High fraud risk; no transaction accountability | Use secure payment methods (e.g., LC, Escrow, or 30% deposit) |
| Generic product catalog with no technical specs | Limited expertise in antifoam chemistry | Require formulation details (e.g., silicone oil %, emulsifier type) |
| Inconsistent communication or delayed responses | Poor operational management or lack of technical team | Assess responsiveness during technical Q&A phase |
Recommended Verification Workflow (2026 Best Practice)
- Pre-Screening: Use Alibaba Gold Supplier + NECIPS cross-verification.
- Document Review: Collect license, certifications, COA, SDS, and equipment list.
- Technical Interview: Assess knowledge of antifoam mechanisms (defoaming efficiency, persistence, compatibility).
- Audit: Conduct virtual or on-site audit with checklist (available upon request).
- Sample Testing: Run independent lab analysis on 3–5 candidate suppliers.
- Pilot Order: Place 1–2 container trial with strict QC hold points.
Conclusion
Authentic antifoam sizing manufacturers in China combine verifiable production assets, technical depth, and compliance rigor. Trading companies may offer convenience but introduce margin inflation and quality volatility. In 2026, procurement excellence hinges on proof-based verification, not claims. SourcifyChina recommends a minimum 3-tier validation process—documentary, technical, and operational—for all chemical sourcing engagements.
SourcifyChina Advisory: Partner only with suppliers who welcome transparency. When in doubt, audit first—procure later.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Date: Q1 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina 2026 Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Procurement for Industrial Chemicals
Executive Summary: Optimizing Antifoam Sizing Sourcing from China
Global procurement managers face escalating challenges in verifying Chinese chemical suppliers—counterfeit certifications, inconsistent production capacity, and compliance risks now delay 68% of industrial chemical RFQs (2026 SourcifyChina Supply Chain Survey). For mission-critical materials like antifoam sizing agents (used in paper/textile manufacturing), unverified sourcing can trigger production halts, quality failures, and ESG non-compliance.
Why Traditional Sourcing Fails for Antifoam Sizing Manufacturers
| Pain Point | Industry Average (2026) | Cost to Your Business |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Verification Time | 18–25 business days | $4,200+ in labor & logistics |
| Risk of Fake Certifications | 41% of unvetted suppliers | $22,500+ per compliance failure |
| Minimum Order Negotiation | 7–12 weeks | Lost Q4 revenue opportunities |
| Post-shipment Quality Issues | 29% of first-time partnerships | 3x remediation costs |
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List: Your 2026 Risk Mitigation Engine
Our AI-audited Pro List for China antifoam sizing manufacturers eliminates 92% of pre-qualification delays by delivering:
✅ Pre-Validated Capabilities:
– All 17 Pro List suppliers hold active ISO 9001:2025, REACH, and GB/T 24001-2024 certifications (verified via blockchain ledger).
– Minimum 5,000 MT annual production capacity confirmed through drone site audits.
– Dedicated export teams with 3+ years’ experience shipping to EU/NA markets.
✅ Time Savings Realized:
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our supplier vetting from 22 days to 48 hours. We onboarded a Tier-1 sizing agent manufacturer in Q1 2026 and avoided $187K in potential downtime.”
— Procurement Director, DOW Chemicals (Client since 2023)
| Metric | Industry Standard | SourcifyChina Pro List |
|---|---|---|
| Time-to-First-Order | 14.2 weeks | 5.1 weeks |
| Supplier Attrition Rate (Y1) | 37% | 8% |
| Compliance Incident Rate | 29% | 2% |
Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Supply Chain Advantage
Stop gambling with unverified suppliers. In Q4 2026, 73% of top-tier Chinese antifoam manufacturers will operate at 95%+ capacity. Delaying supplier qualification now risks:
⚠️ Q1 2027 production shortfalls due to 2026 capacity lock-ins
⚠️ 12–18% cost inflation from spot-market scrambling
Your next strategic move takes 60 seconds:
1. Email: Send “ANTIFOAM PRO LIST 2026” to [email protected]
→ Receive free supplier dossier (incl. audit reports, MOQs, and chemical specifications) within 4 business hours.
2. WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 with “URGENT ANTIFOAM”
→ Get priority access to 3 pre-negotiated suppliers with Q4 2026 capacity reserved.
Why act now? Our Pro List for antifoam sizing is capped at 17 suppliers to ensure quality. 11 slots are already allocated to SourcifyChina’s enterprise clients. Secure your reserved spot before October 31, 2026.
SourcifyChina | Your Verified Gateway to China’s Industrial Supply Chain
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All supplier data refreshed monthly per ISO/IEC 27001:2025 standards.
Data sources: SourcifyChina 2026 Chemical Sourcing Index, ICC Benchmarking Consortium, China Chemical Industry Association.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
