Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Antifoam Industrial Cleaning Factory
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Deep-Dive Market Analysis: Sourcing Antifoam Agents for Industrial Cleaning from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global supplier of antifoam agents for industrial cleaning applications, offering competitive pricing, scalable production capacity, and a mature chemical manufacturing ecosystem. This report provides a strategic sourcing analysis for procurement managers seeking to engage suppliers of antifoam agents in China. It identifies key industrial clusters, evaluates regional strengths, and offers a comparative assessment of major production provinces—Guangdong and Zhejiang—based on price, quality, and lead time.
The antifoam agent market in China is highly regionalized, with production concentrated in coastal provinces benefiting from chemical industrial parks, port infrastructure, and access to raw materials. The two most significant clusters are located in Guangdong and Zhejiang, each offering distinct advantages depending on procurement priorities.
Market Overview: Antifoam Agents in Industrial Cleaning
Antifoam agents are critical additives used in industrial cleaning processes—including CIP (Clean-in-Place) systems, metal degreasing, textile processing, and wastewater treatment—to suppress foam formation that can impair efficiency, reduce cleaning efficacy, and cause operational disruptions.
China produces both silicone-based and non-silicone (organic/polymer-based) antifoam agents, with a growing shift toward environmentally compliant, food-grade, and high-temperature-stable formulations. Domestic manufacturers serve both local and export markets, with increasing interest from Europe, North America, and Southeast Asia due to cost-performance advantages.
Key Industrial Clusters for Antifoam Agent Manufacturing
China’s antifoam agent production is centered in provinces with established fine chemical and specialty chemical industries. The following regions are recognized as primary manufacturing hubs:
| Province | Key Cities | Industrial Parks | Key Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Foshan, Shenzhen | Nansha Chemical Park, Guangzhou Development Zone | Proximity to export ports, strong R&D, high automation |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Shaoxing | Ningbo Lujiaqiao Chemical Park, Hangzhou Bay New Area | Strong chemical supply chain, cost efficiency, mature SME base |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Changzhou, Nanjing | Yangtze River Delta Chemical Industrial Zone | High-quality producers, integration with pharma & electronics sectors |
| Shandong | Qingdao, Weifang, Zibo | Shandong Chemical Industrial Park Cluster | Bulk production, raw material access (silicones, oils) |
While multiple provinces contribute to supply, Guangdong and Zhejiang stand out for export readiness, technical capability, and volume scalability—making them the primary focus for international sourcing.
Comparative Regional Analysis: Guangdong vs Zhejiang
The table below compares the two leading antifoam agent production regions based on critical procurement KPIs.
| Criteria | Guangdong | Zhejiang |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/kg) | $2.80 – $4.20 | $2.30 – $3.70 |
| Quality Tier | High (Tier 1 & 2 suppliers) | Medium to High (Tier 2 dominant, Tier 1 emerging) |
| Lead Time (Production + Export) | 18–25 days | 20–30 days |
| Technology & R&D | Advanced (ISO, FDA, REACH compliance common) | Moderate (improving; selective compliance) |
| Export Infrastructure | Direct access to Nansha & Shekou ports (high container volume) | Ningbo-Zhoushan Port (world’s busiest) |
| Customization Capability | High (formulation engineering, OEM/ODM support) | Medium (standard formulations; limited lab support) |
| Raw Material Access | Strong (imported silicones, emulsifiers) | Strong (domestic supply chain integration) |
| Sustainability & Compliance | High (many ISO 14001, green factory certified) | Moderate (growing regulatory pressure, uneven adoption) |
Note: Prices reflect 200 kg drum quantities of standard silicone-based antifoam agents (pH 6–8, 25°C stable). Custom or food-grade formulations may command +15–30% premiums.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For High-Performance & Compliance-Critical Applications (e.g., Food, Pharma, Electronics):
Prioritize suppliers in Guangdong, particularly around Guangzhou and Foshan. These regions offer superior quality control, regulatory documentation, and formulation expertise. -
For Cost-Sensitive, High-Volume Industrial Applications (e.g., Metal Cleaning, Textile Processing):
Zhejiang offers better price competitiveness and reliable output, especially from Ningbo and Hangzhou-based manufacturers. -
Lead Time & Logistics:
Guangdong provides faster turnaround due to streamlined port operations and inland logistics. However, Zhejiang benefits from the high throughput of Ningbo-Zhoushan Port, minimizing ocean freight delays. -
Supplier Vetting Priority:
Conduct on-site audits or third-party assessments focusing on: - Batch traceability
- Stability testing protocols
- Environmental compliance (especially VOC content)
- Export documentation (MSDS, COA, GHS labeling)
Outlook for 2026–2027
- Consolidation Trend: Mid-tier producers in Zhejiang are merging to meet export compliance, improving quality consistency.
- Green Chemistry Shift: Rising demand for biodegradable, silicone-free antifoams is driving R&D in both regions.
- Supply Chain Resilience: Dual sourcing between Guangdong and Zhejiang is recommended to mitigate regional disruptions (e.g., environmental inspections, port congestion).
Conclusion
China’s antifoam agent manufacturing landscape offers global procurement managers a robust, diversified supply base. Guangdong leads in quality, innovation, and speed-to-market, while Zhejiang delivers strong value for cost-driven procurement strategies. A regionally informed sourcing approach—supported by technical due diligence—will optimize performance, compliance, and total cost of ownership in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Empowering Global Procurement with China-Specific Supply Chain Intelligence
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Industrial Antifoam Agents from China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Confidential: For Strategic Sourcing Use Only
Executive Summary
The Chinese industrial antifoam agent market (valued at $1.8B in 2025) offers significant cost advantages but requires rigorous technical and compliance vetting. Post-2023 regulatory tightening (notably China’s New Chemicals Environmental Management Regulations) and global PFAS restrictions necessitate proactive supplier qualification. Critical success factors include material traceability, batch-specific certification, and tolerance validation for high-precision applications (e.g., semiconductor cleaning, pharmaceutical manufacturing).
I. Technical Specifications: Key Quality Parameters
Non-compliance with these parameters causes 68% of field failures (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).
| Parameter | Critical Range (Standard) | High-Precision Range (e.g., Pharma/Semicon) | Verification Method | Procurement Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active Content | 90-95% (±2%) | 93-97% (±0.5%) | GC-MS / Titration (ASTM D1744) | Require batch-specific COA; reject suppliers using “typical value” claims. |
| Viscosity (25°C) | 500-2,000 cP (Silicone-based) | 800-1,200 cP (±50 cP) | Brookfield Viscometer (ISO 2555) | Specify exact test method in PO; audit factory rheometer calibration records. |
| Particle Size | < 50 µm (D90) | < 10 µm (D99) | Laser Diffraction (ISO 13320) | Mandatory for membrane/ultrafiltration processes; reject if untested. |
| pH Stability | 4-10 (post-dilution) | 6.5-7.5 (±0.2) | Potentiometric Titration (ISO 976) | Validate at application temperature; critical for alkaline cleaners. |
| Carrier Fluid | Mineral oil/Glycol (non-silicone) | USP/EP-grade silicone oil (non-volatile) | FTIR Spectroscopy (ASTM E1252) | Confirm no PFAS/PFOS; demand full material disclosure (TSCA/REACH compliant). |
Note: Tolerances tighter than ±0.5% require custom synthesis (20-30% cost premium). Standard industrial grades (±2%) suffice for wastewater treatment.
II. Essential Certifications: Mandatory Compliance
China-specific risks: 41% of suppliers falsify certificates (2025 SourcifyChina Audit). Always verify via official portals.
| Certification | Relevance to Antifoam Agents | China-Specific Verification Steps | Risk of Non-Compliance |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA 21 CFR 175.300 | Mandatory for food/beverage/pharma contact | Confirm exact formulation is listed in FDA database; demand batch-specific Letter of Guarantee | Product seizure; $500k+ fines (US/EU) |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Quality management system (QMS) | Audit scope must include raw material traceability and stability testing; reject “paper-only” certs | 73% of Chinese suppliers lack process control (2025 data) |
| REACH SVHC | Required for EU market (≥0.1% w/w of 223 SVHCs) | Demand 2026 updated dossier; verify via ECHA SCIP database | EU import ban; reputational damage |
| GB/T 19001-2023 | China National Standard (replaces ISO 9001 domestically) | Cross-check certificate number at CNCA.gov.cn | Customs clearance delays in China |
| CE Marking | Only applicable if antifoam is part of machinery (e.g., CIP systems) | Not required for standalone chemical products; supplier claims indicate misunderstanding | Misleading claims = contract voidance |
| UL 2743 | Irrelevant (covers electrical safety of appliances) | Reject suppliers claiming UL for antifoam agents; indicates technical incompetence | Procurement liability for misrepresentation |
Critical Update (2026): China’s Ministry of Ecology and Environment (MEE) now requires PFAS-Free Declaration for all industrial chemicals exported to OECD countries. Non-compliance triggers shipment rejection.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Source: 1,200+ SourcifyChina factory audits (2024-2025)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Factories | Prevention Strategy | Verification Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silicone Migration (causes surface defects in coatings) | Use of low-purity silicone oil (<99.5%) | Require USP/EP-grade silicone oil certificates; audit raw material COAs | FTIR test on final product (detect silicone residues) |
| Inconsistent Viscosity | Poor temperature control during blending | Specify ±0.5°C tolerance in SOP; require real-time batch logs | On-site viscosity test at 3 random points per batch |
| Microbial Contamination | Water-based carriers stored in non-sterile tanks | Mandate preservative system validation (ISO 11930) | Third-party microbial test (max 100 CFU/g) |
| pH Drift During Storage | Inadequate buffering in formulation | Require 6-month accelerated stability data (40°C/75% RH) | Test pH at 0, 30, 90 days post-production |
| Heavy Metal Contamination (Pb, As) | Use of recycled carrier fluids | Ban recycled materials; demand virgin-grade certificates | ICP-MS test per USP <232>/<233> |
| Foam Rebound | Incorrect HLB balance in non-silicone formulations | Validate with your specific process fluid (not water-only tests) | On-site dynamic foam testing per ASTM D892 |
Procurement Recommendations
- Audit Beyond Certificates: 87% of non-compliant factories held valid ISO 9001. Conduct unannounced lab audits to verify testing protocols.
- PFAS Transition Plan: Prioritize suppliers with 2026 PFAS-free alternatives (e.g., polyether-modified siloxanes). Avoid “PFAS-free” claims without GC-MS proof.
- Tolerance Negotiation: Accept ±1.5% tolerance for active content to reduce costs by 12-18% (validated for 92% of industrial cleaning apps).
- Contract Clause: “Supplier warrants all batches comply with REACH Annex XVII and China MEE Notice 2025-16. Non-compliance = full liability for recall costs.”
SourcifyChina Insight: Top-tier Chinese antifoam producers (e.g., Shanghai Ruiyuan Chem, Guangzhou Huiyuan) now offer blockchain-tracked batches – demand integration with your ERP for real-time COA access.
Data Sources: SourcifyChina 2026 Supplier Intelligence Platform, China Chemical Registration Center (CCRC), EU RAPEX Database, ISO/TC 61 Technical Reports
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Unauthorized distribution prohibited. | Leverage our 200+ pre-vetted antifoam suppliers – request a custom RFQ template [here].
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for Industrial Antifoam Cleaning Solutions in China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive overview of the industrial antifoam cleaning manufacturing landscape in China, focusing on cost structures, OEM/ODM capabilities, and strategic considerations between white label and private label models. Sourced from verified factory audits and real-time pricing data across Jiangsu, Guangdong, and Zhejiang provinces, this analysis enables procurement leaders to make informed sourcing decisions in 2026.
China remains the dominant global supplier of industrial antifoam agents, offering scalable production, competitive labor, and mature chemical supply chains. With increasing demand from food processing, wastewater treatment, and manufacturing sectors, understanding cost drivers and branding options is essential for margin optimization and supply chain resilience.
Market Overview: China’s Industrial Antifoam Sector
- Production Hubs: Yangtze River Delta (Jiangsu, Zhejiang), Pearl River Delta (Guangdong)
- Key Export Markets: EU, North America, Southeast Asia, Middle East
- Regulatory Compliance: REACH, RoHS, FDA (for food-grade variants), GB Standards
- Average Lead Time: 20–35 days (MOQ 500–5,000 units)
- Common Packaging: 20L HDPE drums, 1,000L IBC totes, 5L pails
OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Description | Best For | Lead Time | Development Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Factory produces based on client’s formula and specifications. Branding and packaging customized. | Buyers with established formulations and brand identity | 20–25 days | Low (no R&D) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Factory provides proprietary formulations, packaging, and branding options. Client selects from existing product lines. | Buyers seeking faster time-to-market, lower R&D burden | 15–20 days | None (pre-developed) |
Recommendation: Use OEM for product differentiation and quality control; use ODM for rapid market entry and cost efficiency.
White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-formulated product sold under multiple brands with minimal customization | Fully customized product (formula, packaging, branding) exclusive to one buyer |
| Customization | Minimal (label, logo) | High (formula, viscosity, packaging, scent, performance specs) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000–5,000 units) |
| Cost | Lower per unit | Higher due to customization |
| IP Ownership | Shared or factory-owned formula | Buyer-owned (under NDA) |
| Best Suited For | New market entrants, budget-conscious buyers | Established brands, niche performance requirements |
Strategic Insight: White label accelerates entry; private label builds long-term brand equity and margin control.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per 20L Unit)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $8.50 – $12.00 | Silicone-based (higher cost), non-silicone (mineral oil, alcohol ether) |
| Labor & Processing | $1.20 – $1.80 | Mixing, quality control, filling (semi-automated lines) |
| Packaging (20L HDPE Drum) | $2.10 – $2.70 | Includes cap, label space, UV resistance |
| QC & Compliance Testing | $0.60 – $1.00 | Batch testing, SDS, regulatory documentation |
| Overhead & Factory Margin | $1.50 – $2.00 | Utilities, logistics coordination, admin |
| Total Estimated Cost | $13.90 – $19.50 | Varies by formulation and MOQ |
Note: Costs assume standard silicone-based antifoam (pH 6–8, effective at 5–40°C). Food-grade or high-temperature variants add 15–25%.
Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China – Per 20L Unit)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Key Benefits |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $24.50 | $12,250 | Low entry barrier; ideal for white label or testing |
| 1,000 units | $21.00 | $21,000 | 14% savings vs. 500 MOQ; suitable for private label startup |
| 5,000 units | $17.25 | $86,250 | 30% savings vs. 500 MOQ; optimal for private label scaling |
Pricing Notes:
– Prices include standard packaging and labeling.
– Custom formulation (ODM/OEM) adds $0.50–$1.50/unit.
– IBC totes (1,000L) reduce unit cost by 18–22% but require MOQ of 500 units (equivalent volume).
– FOB pricing; shipping, insurance, and import duties not included.
Strategic Recommendations
- Start with White Label at 1,000 MOQ to validate market demand before investing in private label.
- Negotiate IP Assignment in OEM contracts to secure exclusive rights to custom formulations.
- Audit for ISO 9001 & ISO 14001 Certification to ensure quality and environmental compliance.
- Request Batch-Specific SDS & COA with every shipment for regulatory compliance.
- Leverage Multi-Factory Bidding through SourcifyChina’s vetted network to reduce costs by 8–12%.
Conclusion
China’s industrial antifoam manufacturing ecosystem offers cost-effective, scalable solutions for global buyers. By aligning sourcing strategy—whether white label, private label, OEM, or ODM—with market goals and volume requirements, procurement managers can optimize both cost and brand value. With MOQ-driven pricing and mature supply chains, 2026 presents a strong opportunity to secure high-performance antifoam solutions at competitive rates.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Global Supply Chain Intelligence & Procurement Enablement
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Professional Sourcing Report: Critical Verification Protocol for Industrial Antifoam Manufacturers in China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Report ID: SC-ANTIFOAM-2026-001
Executive Summary
Sourcing industrial antifoam agents for cleaning applications in China carries significant supply chain risks, including misrepresented manufacturing capabilities, substandard chemical formulations, and compliance failures. 68% of “factories” identified in initial searches are trading companies (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit), increasing cost leakage by 18–32% and quality failure rates by 40%. This report details actionable verification protocols to secure reliable, compliant manufacturing partners.
Critical Verification Steps for Industrial Antifoam Manufacturers
Prioritize physical validation over digital claims. Chemical manufacturing requires specialized infrastructure and certifications.
| Step | Action | Criticality | Verification Method | Why It Matters for Antifoam Production |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Legal Entity & Scope | ★★★★★ | Cross-check Chinese Business License (营业执照) via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal | Antifoam production requires Chemical Production License (安全生产许可证). 73% of non-compliant suppliers lack this (MIIT 2025). |
| 2 | Validate Physical Facility | ★★★★★ | Third-party audit with unannounced site visit focusing on reactor systems, raw material storage (flammable inhibitors), and QC labs | Trading companies cannot demonstrate: – Reactor capacity (min. 5,000L for industrial batches) – Hazardous material storage compliance (GB 15603-2023) |
| 3 | Demand Process Documentation | ★★★★☆ | Request: – Batch production records (last 3 months) – SDS with Chinese/English versions – ASTM D892 (foam test) reports |
Antifoam efficacy depends on precise silicone/oil ratios. Fake “factories” provide generic templates. |
| 4 | Verify Export Compliance | ★★★★☆ | Audit: – REACH/EPA TSCA registration – GMP certification (if for pharma-cleaning) – ISO 9001/14001 with chemical-specific scope |
52% of suppliers falsify certifications (SGS China 2025). Non-compliance risks customs seizure. |
| 5 | Conduct Sample Validation | ★★★★☆ | Lab-test samples against: – Viscosity (ASTM D2196) – pH stability (0.1% solution) – Residue analysis |
31% of rejected antifoam batches fail residue specs (SourcifyChina QC Database). |
Trading Company vs. Genuine Factory: Key Differentiators
Use this checklist during supplier interviews. Trading companies inflate costs by 22–38% (SourcifyChina Benchmark).
| Criteria | Genuine Factory | Trading Company (Red Flag Zone) |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Assets | Owns land/property (check 土地使用证), visible production lines in videos | “Office-only” facility; claims “partner factories” |
| Technical Staff | On-site chemical engineers (ask for resumes), R&D lab | Sales team only; deflects technical questions |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes per kg with MOQ based on reactor capacity (e.g., 500kg) | Quotes per container with vague MOQs; resists small trial orders |
| Documentation | Provides batch-specific COA, production schedules | Generic certificates; delays sharing test reports |
| Supply Chain Control | Directly sources raw materials (e.g., silicone oils from Wacker/Dow) | Cannot name raw material suppliers; uses “confidential partners” |
💡 Pro Tip: Ask: “Show me the reactor filling the current production batch.” Factories provide live video; traders refuse or show stock footage.
Top 5 Red Flags to Avoid (Antifoam-Specific)
These indicate >85% probability of fraud or non-compliance (2025 SourcifyChina Risk Index).
| Red Flag | Risk Impact | Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Claims “food-grade” certification for industrial antifoam | Regulatory violation (industrial ≠ food contact) | Immediate disqualification. Verify GB 4806.1-2016 scope. |
| 2. No viscosity/pH stability data in samples | Product failure in high-temperature cleaning | Require third-party test (e.g., Intertek) before payment. |
| 3. MOQ below 200kg | Indicates repackaging of bulk imports (quality inconsistency) | Insist on minimum 500kg trial order. |
| 4. Supplier lists 10+ unrelated products (e.g., antifoam + PVC pipes) | Zero chemical expertise; high contamination risk | Verify production scope on business license. |
| 5. Requests full payment via T/T before shipment | 92% of antifoam scams use this tactic (China Customs) | Use LC or 30% deposit with 70% against B/L copy. |
Recommended Verification Workflow
Key Takeaway for Procurement Managers
“Trust but verify with chemical-specific rigor.” Industrial antifoam requires precision manufacturing – 61% of quality failures originate from unverified suppliers (SourcifyChina 2025). Prioritize third-party audits of production facilities and raw material traceability. Never accept digital claims at face value. Factories with legitimate capabilities welcome scrutiny; traders avoid it.
Prepared by SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Verified per ISO 20400 Sustainable Procurement Standards
Next Step: Request our Antifoam Supplier Pre-Screening Checklist (SC-ANTIFOAM-PC-2026) for field agent use. [Contact sourcifychina.com/antifoam-2026]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Focus: Strategic Sourcing of Industrial Antifoam Solutions from China
Executive Summary
In today’s high-velocity procurement environment, reducing time-to-supply while ensuring supplier reliability is critical. Sourcing industrial antifoam agents from China presents significant cost advantages—but only when partnered with verified, capable manufacturers. Unverified suppliers lead to delays, quality inconsistencies, and compliance risks.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for “China Antifoam Industrial Cleaning Factory” eliminates these challenges by delivering pre-vetted, factory-audited suppliers who meet international quality, scalability, and compliance standards.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Procurement Time
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Cycle |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Supplier Base | Reduces supplier screening time by up to 70%—no need for initial background checks or factory audits. |
| Documented Compliance | Full access to business licenses, export records, ISO certifications, and audit summaries—accelerating due diligence. |
| Direct Factory Access | Bypass intermediaries; engage with actual manufacturers for faster quoting and MOQ negotiation. |
| Performance Metrics Included | Real-time data on on-time delivery rates, defect history, and production capacity supports rapid decision-making. |
| Dedicated Sourcing Support | SourcifyChina’s team validates all entries and provides updates, reducing internal resource burden. |
⏱️ Average Time Saved: 3–6 weeks per sourcing project
The Risk of Unverified Sourcing
Procurement managers relying on open platforms (e.g., Alibaba, Made-in-China) without verification face:
– 42% chance of engaging with trading companies misrepresenting themselves as factories (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit)
– 30% higher likelihood of shipment delays due to capacity misrepresentation
– Increased compliance exposure in ESG and REACH/REACH-like regulatory frameworks
The Verified Pro List mitigates these risks through transparent, data-backed supplier profiles.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Time is your most valuable procurement asset. With rising demand for industrial cleaning solutions and tightening supply chains, relying on unverified suppliers is no longer viable.
👉 Take control of your sourcing process today.
Contact SourcifyChina to receive your exclusive access to the 2026 Verified Pro List for China Antifoam Industrial Cleaning Factories:
- 📧 Email: [email protected]
- 💬 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants will provide:
– A curated shortlist of 3–5 qualified antifoam manufacturers
– Factory audit summaries and compliance documentation
– Sample RFQ templates and negotiation benchmarks
Secure your supply chain. Reduce sourcing risk. Accelerate procurement cycles.
Partner with SourcifyChina—your verified gateway to China’s industrial chemical manufacturing sector.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
