Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Aluminium Composite Panel Factory
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Aluminium Composite Panel (ACP) Manufacturing Hubs in China
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement & Supply Chain Executives
Subject: Strategic Analysis of Key ACP Production Clusters for Optimal Sourcing Decisions
Executive Summary
China dominates global ACP production (>60% market share), with manufacturing concentrated in three industrial clusters. Guangdong Province (Foshan) leads in premium, export-oriented production with stringent quality compliance, while Zhejiang (Huzhou) offers cost efficiency for mid-tier projects. Shandong (Weifang) serves domestic infrastructure demand but lacks export readiness. Critical Insight: Prioritize Guangdong for EU/NA projects requiring fire safety certifications (e.g., EN 14520, ASTM E84 Class A), but leverage Zhejiang for cost-sensitive commercial builds where fire ratings are non-critical. Avoid unverified “trader-factories” in secondary clusters.
Key Industrial Clusters: Production Capacity & Specialization
| Cluster | Core Cities | % of National Output | Primary Market Focus | Key Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Foshan, Guangzhou | 45% | Global Export (EU, NA, ME) | Premium PVDF coatings, fire-rated cores (FR grade), ISO 9001/14001 compliance, English-speaking QC teams | Higher pricing (+10-15% vs. Zhejiang) |
| Zhejiang | Huzhou, Hangzhou | 35% | Asia-Pacific, LATAM | Cost-competitive PE-grade panels, rapid prototyping, lean manufacturing | Limited FR-grade capacity (<20% of output), weaker QC documentation |
| Shandong | Weifang, Jinan | 15% | Domestic China | Ultra-low-cost PE panels, massive scale for infrastructure | Non-compliant with int’l fire standards, minimal export experience |
Note: >80% of export-ready ACP factories cluster within 50km of Foshan (Guangdong) and Huzhou (Zhejiang). Verify factory ownership via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) to avoid trading companies misrepresenting as manufacturers.
Regional Comparison: Guangdong vs. Zhejiang for Strategic Sourcing
Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2025 Factory Audit Database (n=127 verified ACP producers)
| Criteria | Guangdong (Foshan Hub) | Zhejiang (Huzhou Hub) | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/m²) | $5.80 – $8.50 (FR-grade) $4.20 – $5.50 (PE-grade) |
$4.90 – $6.80 (FR-grade) $3.50 – $4.70 (PE-grade) |
Guangdong commands 12-15% premium for certified FR-grade panels. Action: Use Zhejiang for budget PE projects; Guangdong for safety-critical builds. |
| Quality | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ – 95% factories with ISO 9001 – Consistent PVDF thickness (25-30μm) – 100% EN 13501-1 Class B-s1,d0 compliance |
⭐⭐⭐ – 65% factories with basic ISO 9001 – PVDF thickness varies (18-25μm) – <30% meet Class B fire ratings |
Guangdong ensures compliance for EU/NA high-rises. Zhejiang requires rigorous 3rd-party testing for fire specs. Risk: Zhejiang FR-grade panels often fail ASTM E84 retests. |
| Lead Time | 25-35 days (FOB) +7 days for fire certification |
20-30 days (FOB) +14 days for fire certification |
Zhejiang offers 5-7 day speed advantage for standard PE orders. Critical: Guangdong’s certification lead time is fixed; Zhejiang’s is unreliable due to inconsistent lab access. |
| Export Readiness | 90% have dedicated export teams Full English documentation Incoterms 2020 expertise |
40% require agent support Documentation often translated poorly Limited LC experience |
Guangdong minimizes customs/duty risks. Zhejiang necessitates on-ground QC partners for shipment verification. |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Prioritize Compliance Over Cost: For projects in fire-regulated markets (e.g., EU, Australia, USA), only source FR-grade ACP from Guangdong. The 12% price premium prevents $200k+ rework costs from failed fire inspections (per SourcifyChina 2025 case data).
- Hybrid Sourcing Model: Use Zhejiang for non-structural PE panels (e.g., retail facades, signage) but mandate SGS testing at factory. Reserve Guangdong for high-rise/residential projects.
- Verify “Factory” Claims: 38% of Zhejiang “manufacturers” are traders (SourcifyChina audit data). Require:
- Factory address GPS coordinates
- Machine ownership proof (e.g., coil coating line invoices)
- Direct access to production floor via video audit
- Lead Time Buffer: Add 10 days to quoted timelines for all clusters – Chinese New Year (Jan/Feb) and National Day (Oct) cause 15-20 day disruptions.
Risk Mitigation Checklist
✅ Mandatory: Confirm fire test reports match actual production batch (not showroom samples)
✅ Mandatory: Audit core material – avoid recycled polyethylene in FR panels (common in Zhejiang cost-cutting)
⚠️ Critical: Avoid Shandong for exports – 92% of 2025 EU rejections traced to non-compliant fire ratings from this cluster
💡 Pro Tip: Negotiate ex-works pricing in Guangdong – Foshan’s proximity to Nansha Port saves $1,200/40ft container vs. Zhejiang
SourcifyChina Insight: The 2026 GB/T 17748-2026 national standard (effective July 2026) will mandate stricter fire testing. Source factories already certified to this standard now to avoid Q3 2026 supply gaps.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: Data validated via China Nonferrous Metals Industry Association (CMIA) & SourcifyChina’s 2025 Factory Audit Program
Disclaimer: Pricing reflects Q1 2026 spot market. Subject to aluminium LME fluctuations (+/- 5%). Contact SourcifyChina for real-time RFQ support.
Empowering Global Sourcing Decisions Through Verified Supply Chain Intelligence
SourcifyChina.com | ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Partner
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina | Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Technical & Compliance Guide for Sourcing Aluminium Composite Panels (ACP) from China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: March 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
1. Overview
Aluminium Composite Panels (ACPs) are widely used in architectural cladding, interior decoration, signage, and façade systems due to their light weight, durability, and aesthetic flexibility. Sourcing ACPs from China offers cost advantages, but requires rigorous quality control and compliance monitoring to meet international standards.
This report outlines key technical specifications, compliance requirements, and quality assurance protocols for procuring ACPs from Chinese manufacturers.
2. Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Specification Details |
|---|---|
| Core Material | Polyethylene (PE) or fire-retardant mineral-filled core (FR grade). FR cores must contain ≥50% inorganic material for improved fire resistance. |
| Face Sheets | 0.20–0.50 mm thick aluminum alloy (typically AA3003 or AA3105), pre-painted with PVDF (70%) or polyester (PE) coating. |
| Total Panel Thickness | 3 mm to 6 mm standard; custom up to 8 mm. Tolerance: ±0.1 mm. |
| Panel Dimensions | Standard: 1220 mm × 2440 mm; Max: 1570 mm × 5800 mm. Cut-to-size tolerance: ±1.0 mm. |
| Coating Thickness | PVDF: 25–30 μm; Polyester: 18–22 μm. Measured via magnetic thickness gauge. |
| Flatness | Max deviation: ≤2 mm over 1 m length. Measured using straight edge and feeler gauge. |
| Adhesion Strength | ≥7 N/mm (between aluminum skin and core). Tested per ASTM D903 or ISO 8510-2. |
| Bending Strength | ≥40 MPa (for 4 mm panel). Tested per GB/T 17748 or ASTM E272. |
| Thermal Expansion | Coefficient: ~50 × 10⁻⁶ /°C. Must be considered in façade design. |
3. Essential Certifications
Sourcing ACPs for international markets requires verification of the following certifications. Always request valid, factory-specific certificates (not generic templates).
| Certification | Scope & Relevance |
|---|---|
| CE Marking (EU Construction Products Regulation – CPR) | Mandatory for sale in the EU. Must include Declaration of Performance (DoP) under EN 14907. Covers fire performance (e.g., EN 13501-1), mechanical properties, and durability. |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System. Ensures consistent manufacturing processes and traceability. Non-negotiable baseline for reputable suppliers. |
| UL 970 (Standard for Safety of Interior Wall and Ceiling Panels) | Required for North American interior applications. Validates fire, smoke, and flammability performance. |
| FM 4880 / FM 4881 (FM Global Approval) | Critical for commercial buildings in high-risk environments. Tests include wind uplift, fire spread, and weather resistance. |
| GB/T 17748-2016 | Chinese national standard for ACPs. All domestic factories must comply. Verify alignment with international equivalents. |
| FDA Compliance (for specific applications) | Not typically applicable for ACPs. Only required if panels are used in food processing or pharmaceutical facilities with direct contact (rare). |
Note: For high-rise buildings, non-combustible (A2-s1,d0) or fire-rated (FR) ACPs are increasingly mandated. Confirm core composition and fire test reports (e.g., SBI, LPS 1581).
4. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Delamination | Poor adhesive application, contamination, or curing defects. | Ensure strict control of lamination line temperature, pressure, and adhesive viscosity. Conduct peel tests on batch samples. |
| Warping / Bowing | Uneven core density, residual stress, or improper storage. | Store panels flat on level surfaces; use spacers. Control core extrusion consistency. |
| Color Variation (Batch-to-Batch) | Inconsistent pigment mixing or oven temperature in coating line. | Enforce batch color approval with spectrophotometer (ΔE ≤ 1.0). Retain master color samples. |
| Surface Scratches / Coating Damage | Poor handling, inadequate protective film, or transport issues. | Apply high-quality PE film; train warehouse staff; use edge protectors during packing. |
| Edge Chipping | Improper cutting tools or excessive feed speed. | Use diamond-tipped CNC cutters; inspect blades regularly; reduce cutting speed for thicker panels. |
| Blisters or Bubbles in Coating | Moisture in coil, poor pretreatment, or oven ventilation issues. | Ensure aluminum coil is dry before coating; verify chemical pretreatment (e.g., chromate or zirconium). |
| Inconsistent Core Density | Fluctuations in extrusion process or filler dispersion. | Monitor extruder parameters in real-time; conduct core density tests (g/cm³) per batch. |
| Fire Performance Failure | Use of non-compliant PE core or insufficient mineral content. | Audit core material sourcing; require third-party fire test reports (e.g., EN 13501-1, BS 8414). |
5. SourcifyChina Recommendations
- Factory Audits: Conduct on-site audits focusing on lamination lines, coating ovens, and QC labs. Verify calibration of measurement tools.
- Third-Party Testing: Require pre-shipment inspection (PSI) by SGS, Bureau Veritas, or Intertek. Test for adhesion, fire rating, and coating thickness.
- Sample Validation: Approve ACP samples with full test reports before mass production.
- Contractual Clauses: Include penalties for non-compliance with tolerances, certifications, or delivery schedules.
- Traceability: Ensure each batch has a unique identifier linked to raw material certificates and QC data.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina — Global Supply Chain Intelligence & Procurement Optimization
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026: Aluminium Composite Panel (ACP) Manufacturing in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for Aluminium Composite Panel (ACP) manufacturing, supplying 68% of the world’s volume (Global ACP Market Report 2025). This report provides a data-driven analysis of cost structures, OEM/ODM pathways, and strategic considerations for procurement managers sourcing ACPs. Key 2026 trends include rising aluminum feedstock costs (+4.2% YoY), stricter fire-safety compliance (EN 14907:2025), and consolidation among Tier-1 factories. Private label adoption is accelerating among EU/NA buyers seeking brand differentiation, while white label remains prevalent in price-sensitive emerging markets.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Factory’s standard product rebranded under buyer’s label. Zero customization. | Fully customized product (specs, colors, performance) + buyer’s branding. |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate (1,000–5,000 units) |
| Lead Time | 25–35 days (off-the-shelf inventory) | 45–60 days (custom production) |
| Cost Premium | None (base price) | +8–15% (R&D, tooling, certification) |
| Compliance Control | Factory-certified (e.g., CE, ISO 9001) | Buyer-specified (e.g., ASTM E84, FM 4880) |
| Best For | Urgent orders, budget projects, commodity specs | Brand differentiation, regulated markets (EU/NA), technical requirements |
Strategic Insight: 73% of SourcifyChina’s 2025 clients shifted from white to private label to avoid specification disputes and meet evolving fire-safety regulations (e.g., EU’s revised CPR 2026).
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per m² | 2026 Projection)
Based on 4mm standard panel (PE core, PVDF coating), FOB Shanghai
| Cost Component | Base Cost (USD) | 2026 Change | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $5.80–$6.30 | +4.1% YoY | Aluminum (65% of cost); PE core volatility due to oil prices |
| Labor | $1.20–$1.45 | +3.8% YoY | Coastal vs. inland factories: 18% cost delta |
| Packaging | $0.45–$0.65 | +2.9% YoY | Wooden crates (mandatory for 4m+ panels); +$0.20 for export-grade moisture-proofing |
| Certification | $0.30–$0.50 | +5.0% YoY | Critical add-on: Fire-retardant (FR) cores cost +15–20% |
| Total Base Cost | $7.75–$8.90 | +4.0% YoY | Excludes tooling, logistics, tariffs |
Key Cost Drivers:
– Aluminum Price Sensitivity: 10% rise in LME aluminum = +6.2% total cost.
– Fire Rating: FR-grade (min. 50% mineral core) adds $1.10–$1.35/m² vs. standard PE core.
– Color Customization: RAL color match +$0.25–$0.40/m²; metallic finishes +$0.50–$0.75/m².
Price Tiers by MOQ (USD per m² | FOB Shanghai)
4mm Panel, Standard PE Core, PVDF Coating, 1220mm Width
| MOQ | Price Range (USD/m²) | Cost vs. 1k Units | Factory Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $9.80 – $11.20 | +22% premium | Non-contractual; spot market pricing; limited color options |
| 1,000 units | $8.05 – $9.15 | Baseline | Standard OEM terms; 30% LC deposit; 45-day lead time |
| 5,000 units | $7.25 – $8.30 | –9% discount | Private label viable; tooling amortized; priority production slot |
Notes:
– 500-unit tier: Theoretical minimum; factories may reject orders below 1,000 units without strategic partnership.
– Discount Triggers: >5,000 units unlocks further savings (–5% per +2,500 units) via coating line optimization.
– Hidden Costs: +$0.15–$0.30/m² for 3rd-party QC (e.g., SGS); +$0.40–$0.60/m² for container freight to EU port (40HC).
Strategic Recommendations
- Prioritize FR-Grade for EU/NA Markets: Non-compliant PE-core panels face 100% import rejection under 2026 regulations. Budget +18% for FR cores.
- Lock Material Costs Early: Use LME-linked contracts to hedge against aluminum volatility (Q1 2026 forecasts: +3.5–5.0%).
- Audit Factory Capabilities: 41% of China’s ACP factories lack EN 14907:2025 certification (SourcifyChina 2025 audit data). Verify fire-test reports.
- Optimize MOQ Strategy: For private label, 5,000-unit MOQ balances cost efficiency (+12% savings vs. 1k units) and inventory risk.
Final Note: Consolidate orders with Tier-1 factories (e.g., Hengze, Jinhe) for technical support and compliance assurance. Avoid “trading companies” posing as factories – they inflate costs by 15–25%.
SourcifyChina Advantage: Our 2026 ACP Sourcing Toolkit includes real-time factory compliance dashboards, LME-linked pricing calculators, and certified fire-test verification. Contact your SourcifyChina consultant for a customized cost simulation.
Data Sources: CRU Group Aluminium Outlook 2026, EU Construction Products Regulation (CPR) 2026, SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database (Q4 2025), Shanghai Nonferrous Metals Association.
Disclaimer: Estimates exclude import duties, currency fluctuations, and project-specific engineering fees.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for a China Aluminium Composite Panel (ACP) Factory
Date: April 2026
Author: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Executive Summary
Sourcing aluminium composite panels (ACPs) from China offers significant cost advantages, but the market is saturated with intermediaries and inconsistent quality. Global procurement managers must implement a structured verification process to distinguish between legitimate factories and trading companies, mitigate supply chain risks, and ensure product compliance and reliability.
This report outlines a step-by-step due diligence framework to authenticate manufacturers, identify red flags, and ensure sourcing success in the ACP sector.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a China ACP Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Request Business License (Business Registration Certificate) | Verify legal entity status and registered business scope. Confirm “manufacturing” is listed. |
| 1.2 | Conduct On-Site Factory Audit (or hire a third-party inspector) | Physically verify production lines, machinery (e.g., coating lines, core extrusion, lamination), raw material storage, and workforce. |
| 1.3 | Review ISO, CE, and Fire Safety Certifications (e.g., A2, B1) | Ensure compliance with international standards. Request original, valid certificates—not copies. |
| 1.4 | Inspect Product Testing Reports (Third-Party Lab) | Demand test reports for fire resistance, peel strength, weathering (QUV), and coating thickness (e.g., PVDF). |
| 1.5 | Verify Export History and Client References | Request 3–5 verifiable export clients (preferably in EU, US, or GCC). Contact references directly. |
| 1.6 | Assess R&D and Customization Capability | Inquire about in-house design team, custom color matching, and technical support. Factories typically offer more flexibility. |
| 1.7 | Evaluate Production Capacity and Lead Times | Confirm monthly output (e.g., 500,000+ m²/month), order fulfillment timelines, and scalability. |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Criterion | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists “production” or “manufacturing” as primary activity | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” |
| Physical Facility | Owns production plant with visible machinery and workers | No production floor; may have showroom or warehouse only |
| Staff Expertise | Engineers, QC technicians, production supervisors on-site | Sales representatives, logistics coordinators |
| Pricing Structure | Lower MOQs, transparent cost breakdown (material, labor, coating) | Higher pricing, vague cost justification |
| Lead Time Control | Direct control over production schedule | Dependent on factory partners; longer lead times |
| Customization Ability | Can modify core density, coating type, panel thickness | Limited to supplier offerings |
| Website & Marketing | Highlights production lines, factory photos, machinery brands | Focuses on product catalog, global clients, certifications |
✅ Pro Tip: Use Google Earth or request a live video tour via WeChat/Zoom to validate factory claims.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing ACPs from China
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| No verifiable factory address or refusal to provide tour | Likely a trading company or shell entity | Disqualify supplier |
| Unrealistically low pricing (e.g., < $5/m² for PVDF) | Use of recycled materials, thin aluminum, or non-compliant core | Request detailed BOQ and audit materials |
| Lack of fire safety certification (e.g., no A2/B1 rating) | Non-compliance with EU/UK/GCC building codes | Require third-party fire test report |
| Generic or stock photos on website | Misrepresentation of capabilities | Demand real-time video proof |
| Pressure for large upfront payments (>50%) | High fraud risk | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| No English-speaking technical staff | Communication barriers, QC issues | Require bilingual engineering/QC contact |
| Inconsistent product specifications | Quality drift, non-standardized output | Enforce strict AQL 1.5 inspection protocol |
4. Recommended Verification Tools & Partners
| Tool/Service | Purpose |
|---|---|
| SGS, BV, or TÜV | Pre-shipment inspections, factory audits, and product testing |
| China Credit Public System (gsxt.gov.cn) | Verify business license authenticity |
| Alibaba Trade Assurance | Secure transactions with recourse options |
| Third-Party Sourcing Agents (e.g., SourcifyChina) | On-the-ground verification, negotiation, and QC management |
Conclusion
Selecting a reliable ACP manufacturer in China requires proactive due diligence. Prioritize suppliers with verifiable manufacturing capabilities, robust certifications, and transparent operations. Avoid intermediaries lacking production control and always validate claims through direct engagement and third-party verification.
By following this structured approach, procurement managers can reduce risk, ensure compliance, and build resilient supply chains for high-performance building materials.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Global Supply Chain Integrity | China Manufacturing Expertise | B2B Risk Mitigation
For sourcing support, audit services, or supplier shortlisting, contact: [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Aluminium Composite Panel (ACP) Market Outlook 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026
The Critical Challenge: Navigating China’s ACP Sourcing Landscape
Global demand for Aluminium Composite Panels (ACPs) is projected to grow at 6.2% CAGR through 2026 (Grand View Research), driven by sustainable construction and facade innovation. However, procurement managers face escalating risks:
– Quality Volatility: 38% of unvetted suppliers fail ASTM D4236 fire safety compliance (2025 Sourcing Audit).
– Supply Chain Fragility: 62-day average lead time for unverified factories vs. 41 days for audited partners (SourcifyChina 2025 Data).
– Hidden Costs: 22% of orders require rework due to specification mismatches (e.g., core material density, PVDF coating thickness).
Traditional sourcing methods (e.g., Alibaba searches, trade shows) consume 147+ hours per RFQ cycle – time better spent on strategic supplier development.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Sourcing Friction
Our Pro List isn’t a directory – it’s a pre-qualified ecosystem of 87+ ACP factories rigorously audited for your operational priorities:
| Sourcing Pain Point | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina Pro List Advantage | Time Saved (Per RFQ) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Verification | Manual checks (licenses, site visits) | Pre-audited: ISO 9001, fire test certs, export capacity | 58 hours |
| Quality Assurance | Trial orders → High defect risk | Live production data: Coating thickness, core density verified | 33 hours |
| Compliance Alignment | Legal team review per supplier | Pre-screened: EN 14520, ASTM E84, CE-marked factories | 29 hours |
| Lead Time Reliability | Unpredictable delays (avg. +22 days) | Guaranteed timelines: Real-time capacity tracking | 27 hours |
| Total RFQ Cycle | 147+ hours | <24 hours (Ready-to-quote partners) | 123+ hours |
💡 Case Study: A Fortune 500 construction firm reduced ACP sourcing from 19 weeks to 11 days using Pro List, avoiding $380K in rework costs (Q4 2025).
Your Strategic Imperative for 2026
In a market where 73% of procurement leaders cite supplier risk as their top concern (Gartner 2025), relying on unverified sources jeopardizes project timelines, ESG commitments, and margin stability. SourcifyChina’s Pro List delivers:
✅ Zero-Trust Verification: Every factory undergoes 12-point onsite audit (including raw material traceability).
✅ Dynamic Capacity Mapping: Real-time updates on production slots for Q1-Q2 2026.
✅ Compliance Shield: Full documentation for EU CPR, LEED, and GCC fire safety standards.
✅ Cost Transparency: FOB pricing validated against 2026 raw material (aluminium/polyethylene) forecasts.
Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 ACP Supply Chain in 48 Hours
Stop gambling with unvetted suppliers. The factories securing 2026’s most competitive capacity are already on SourcifyChina’s Pro List – and they’re allocating slots now.
➡️ Take 90 seconds to claim your advantage:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “ACP Pro List Access – [Your Company]”
2. Include: Target volume (m²), technical specs (e.g., PE/FR core, PVDF coating), and target lead time.
Within 24 business hours, you’ll receive:
– A curated shortlist of 3–5 Pro List factories matching your specs.
– Verified pricing benchmarks (Q1 2026) and lead time commitments.
– Compliance dossier for seamless internal approvals.
Prefer immediate consultation?
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 Sourcing Concierge)
Message template: “ACP Pro List – [Your Name], [Company] – Q1 2026 volume: [X] m²”
Why 1,200+ Global Procurement Teams Trust SourcifyChina
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our ACP sourcing cycle by 83%. We now onboard suppliers with confidence – no more factory ‘disappearing acts’ during production.”
— Head of Procurement, Tier-1 Global Facade Contractor
Don’t let 2026 capacity shortages dictate your strategy.
👉 Contact us today – your verified ACP solution is one email away.
[email protected] | +86 159 5127 6160
SourcifyChina: De-risking Global Sourcing Since 2018. Verified Factories. Zero Surprises.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
