Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Alnico Magnet Bar For Education Factory
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Alnico Magnet Bars for Education Factories (2026 Outlook)
Prepared For: Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leaders
Date: October 26, 2026
Report ID: SC-ALNICO-EDU-2026-Q4
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global source for alnico magnet bars, supplying >85% of the world’s volume. For education-specific applications (classroom demonstrations, basic physics kits, STEM kits), demand prioritizes cost efficiency, safety compliance, and standardized dimensions over ultra-high magnetic performance. This report identifies optimal sourcing clusters, highlighting critical trade-offs between price, quality consistency, and lead times. Key insight: Education-grade magnets require distinct supplier vetting vs. industrial-grade—focusing on batch consistency and non-toxic coatings—not peak energy density.
Market Context: Education-Grade Alnico Magnet Bars
- Definition: Low-to-mid grade Alnico 2/3/5 alloys (Br: 5,000-7,000 Gauss), typically 5-20mm diameter x 50-150mm length. Prioritizes visual clarity (polished surfaces), safety (nickel/copper plating), dimensional accuracy (±0.1mm), and cost (<$1.50/unit at MOQ 1k).
- Volume Driver: Global STEM education expansion; 12% CAGR in emerging markets (2024-2026).
- Critical Differentiator: Education factories reject “industrial surplus” magnets. Requires dedicated production lines with traceable material certs (RoHS, REACH) and age-appropriate packaging (blunt edges, child-safe labels).
Key Industrial Clusters for Education-Grade Alnico Magnet Bars
China’s production is concentrated in 3 provinces, each with distinct advantages for education-specific sourcing:
| Production Cluster | Core Cities | Specialization for Education Factories | Key Supplier Types |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zhejiang Province | Ningbo, Yuyao, Hangzhou | Dominant cluster for education-grade. High density of SMEs focused exclusively on educational/science kits. Expertise in low-MOQ runs (500+ units), custom labeling, and safety-compliant plating. | OEM/ODM specialists, Kit assemblers |
| Guangdong Province | Dongguan, Shenzhen | Premium industrial magnet hub. Strong for high-spec alnico; education-grade is secondary. Better for large-volume orders (>10k units) needing tighter tolerances. Higher export compliance rigor. | Tier-1 industrial suppliers, Export-focused OEMs |
| Hebei Province | Baoding, Tianjin Peri-urban | Emerging low-cost cluster. Rising share in budget education magnets. Competitive pricing but inconsistent QC for education-specific safety specs (e.g., coating adhesion). | Price-driven workshops, Smaller foundries |
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Trade-offs for Education Factories (2026 Baseline)
Assumptions: 10mm x 100mm Alnico 3 bar, Ni-Cu-Ni plating, MOQ 1,000 units, FOB China Port.
| Factor | Zhejiang (Ningbo/Yuyao) | Guangdong (Dongguan) | Hebei (Baoding) | Recommendation for Education Factories |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/unit) | $1.20 – $1.50 Lowest for education-spec due to cluster specialization & competition. |
$1.80 – $2.20 Premium for industrial infrastructure; education-grade marked up 20-30% vs. Zhejiang. |
$0.90 – $1.20 Lowest base price, but hidden costs likely (rejection rates, rework). |
Zhejiang for best total cost (price + reliability). Avoid Hebei without rigorous QC audits. |
| Quality Consistency | ★★★★☆ High batch-to-batch consistency for education specs (dimensions, plating). 95%+ pass rate on safety checks. Minor variance in Br (±5%). |
★★★★★ Highest precision (±0.05mm). Over-specified for education—wasted cost. Near-100% compliance with global safety standards. |
★★☆☆☆ High rejection risk: 15-25% fail coating adhesion/salt spray tests. Br variance up to ±12%. |
Zhejiang balances sufficient quality (meets education needs) at optimal cost. Guangdong is over-engineered. |
| Lead Time | 35-45 days Flexible for small batches but reliant on subcontracted plating (bottleneck). |
25-35 days Integrated production; faster for large orders. Less flexible for <5k units. |
40-60+ days Frequent delays due to rework, logistics bottlenecks. |
Zhejiang for orders 500-5k units. Guangdong for orders >10k units needing speed. |
| Critical Risk | Plating subcontractor delays; occasional labeling errors. | Price volatility for small orders; less responsive to education-specific requests. | High risk of non-compliance (Pb in plating, sharp edges); frequent shipment rejections by EU/US schools. | Prioritize Zhejiang with mandatory 3rd-party safety testing. |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Target Zhejiang for >80% of Sourcing: Ningbo/Yuyao clusters offer the best alignment with education factory requirements (cost, safety, MOQ flexibility). Action: Pre-qualify suppliers with ISO 13485 (medical device standard—ensures safety rigor) and request STEM kit production references.
- Avoid “Industrial Magnet” Suppliers for Education Kits: Factories in Dongguan/Baoding producing motors/sensors often lack education-specific QA protocols (e.g., child-safety edge testing). Action: Require evidence of past education-sector shipments.
- Mandate Batch Testing: Specify ASTM F963-17 (Toy Safety) for plating toxicity and edge smoothness—non-negotiable for school use. Budget 3-5% of order value for 3rd-party lab checks (e.g., SGS Ningbo).
- Leverage 2026 Tariff Shifts: Under China’s 2025 Export Tax Rebate update, education kits (HS 9023.00.00) attract 13% VAT refund vs. 9% for industrial magnets (HS 8505.11.00). Action: Ensure suppliers use correct HS code to reduce landed cost by 4-6%.
- Future-Proofing: Monitor Anhui Province (Hefei) for rising automation in magnet finishing—expected to cut lead times by 15% by 2027. Not yet viable for 2026 education orders.
Conclusion
For global education factories, Zhejiang Province (Ningbo/Yuyao) is the unequivocal sourcing hub for alnico magnet bars in 2026, delivering the optimal balance of cost, education-specific quality, and compliance. While Hebei offers lower headline prices and Guangdong provides premium precision, both introduce significant hidden costs or over-engineering for classroom applications. Procurement success hinges on partnering with Zhejiang-based suppliers experienced in STEM kit manufacturing and enforcing strict safety batch testing. SourcifyChina’s 2026 Supplier Scorecard identifies 17 pre-vetted Zhejiang partners meeting all education-sector criteria—available to qualified buyers upon request.
SourcifyChina Disclaimer: Data based on 2026 Q3 supplier surveys, customs analytics, and client shipment audits. Prices exclude 2026 potential rare-earth element (REE) policy impacts. Always conduct on-site audits for new suppliers.
Next Steps: Request our Verified Supplier List: Education Magnet Bars (China) with compliance certifications and capacity benchmarks. [Contact Sourcing Team]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Product: China Alnico Magnet Bar for Educational Factory Applications
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: March 2026
Executive Summary
Alnico magnet bars are widely used in educational science kits, physics demonstration tools, and laboratory equipment due to their strong magnetic properties, temperature stability, and durability. When sourcing Alnico magnet bars from China for educational facilities, procurement managers must ensure compliance with international safety standards, strict dimensional tolerances, and material integrity. This report outlines the technical specifications, compliance requirements, and quality control best practices to mitigate risk and ensure product reliability.
1. Technical Specifications
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Material Composition | AlNiCo (Aluminum-Nickel-Cobalt) alloy, typically Alnico 5 or Alnico 8 (8–12% Al, 14–18% Ni, 20–26% Co, 3–5% Cu, <1% Ti, remainder Fe) |
| Magnetic Properties | – Remanence (Br): 7,000–13,500 Gauss – Coercivity (Hc): 640–1,900 Oe – Energy Product (BHmax): 1.4–7.5 MGOe |
| Operating Temperature | Up to 525°C (977°F); suitable for high-temp educational experiments |
| Shape & Form | Rectangular bar, typically 50–200 mm in length, 10–25 mm width, 5–10 mm thickness |
| Magnetization Direction | Axially magnetized (along length) unless specified otherwise |
| Surface Finish | Smooth, non-abrasive; typically bare metal or epoxy-coated for safety |
| Tolerances | • Length: ±0.1 mm • Width: ±0.05 mm • Thickness: ±0.05 mm • Parallelism: ≤ 0.02 mm • Surface Flatness: ≤ 0.03 mm |
Note: Tight tolerances are critical for consistency in classroom demonstrations and repeatability in student experiments.
2. Compliance & Certification Requirements
| Certification | Requirement | Relevance to Educational Use |
|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Mandatory for export to EU. Confirms compliance with EU safety, health, and environmental directives (e.g., RoHS, REACH). | Ensures safe use in EU classrooms; verifies absence of hazardous substances. |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System certification. | Validates consistent manufacturing processes and traceability. |
| RoHS (EU Directive 2011/65/EU) | Restriction of Hazardous Substances (Pb, Cd, Hg, Cr⁶⁺, etc.). | Critical for child-safe educational products. |
| REACH (EC 1907/2006) | Registration, Evaluation, Authorization of Chemicals. | Ensures no SVHCs (Substances of Very High Concern) in materials. |
| UL Recognition (Optional) | UL 94 V-0 for flammability if coated; general safety compliance. | Preferred for North American schools; enhances liability protection. |
| FDA Compliance (Indirect) | Not directly applicable unless in food-contact proximity. However, non-toxic coatings must comply with FDA 21 CFR if used. | Relevant for labs involving food science or biology. |
Procurement Tip: Request factory audit reports (e.g., via third-party inspectors) to verify certification authenticity and production consistency.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | How to Prevent |
|---|---|
| Inconsistent Magnetic Strength | Implement batch testing using a gaussmeter; require suppliers to provide magnetic flux data per batch. |
| Dimensional Tolerance Deviation | Use calibrated CNC grinding; enforce in-process inspections with coordinate measuring machines (CMM). |
| Surface Chipping or Cracking | Optimize sintering and cooling cycles; avoid mechanical stress during handling; use edge rounding. |
| Poor Coating Adhesion (if coated) | Ensure surface degreasing and sandblasting before epoxy application; conduct cross-hatch adhesion tests. |
| Corrosion or Rust Formation | Store in low-humidity environments; apply protective oil or epoxy coating; avoid bare metal exposure. |
| Demagnetization During Handling | Educate factory staff on magnetic field safety; avoid exposure to AC fields or high heat during packaging. |
| Non-Compliant Material Composition | Require Material Test Reports (MTRs) and third-party lab verification (e.g., XRF analysis for RoHS). |
4. Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Qualification: Prioritize manufacturers with ISO 9001 certification and experience supplying educational or scientific equipment.
- Sample Testing: Conduct pre-production and bulk sampling with independent labs for magnetic, dimensional, and chemical compliance.
- Packaging: Use anti-static, shock-resistant packaging with individual bar separation to prevent chipping and demagnetization.
- Labeling: Include lot numbers, material grade, magnetization direction, and compliance marks on packaging.
Conclusion
Sourcing Alnico magnet bars from China for educational use demands a structured quality assurance approach. By enforcing tight tolerances, verifying compliance with CE, RoHS, and ISO standards, and proactively mitigating common defects, procurement managers can ensure safe, reliable, and repeatable performance in academic environments. SourcifyChina recommends integrating factory audits and third-party inspections into the procurement lifecycle to de-risk supply chain operations in 2026 and beyond.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in Global Sourcing Excellence
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026: Alnico Magnet Bars for Educational Factories
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: Q1 2026
Subject: Cost Analysis, Labeling Strategy & MOQ-Based Pricing Guide
Executive Summary
Alnico magnet bars remain vital for STEM education kits due to their thermal stability, durability, and non-corrosive properties. Sourcing from China offers 25–35% cost savings vs. Western manufacturers, but requires strategic oversight of material compliance, labeling models, and volume planning. This report provides actionable data for optimizing procurement of education-grade alnico magnet bars (standard规格: 100mm x 10mm x 5mm, Grade Alnico 5, N35-N50 strength).
Market Overview: China Sourcing Landscape (2026)
- Key Shifts: Rising cobalt prices (+18% YoY due to EV battery demand), stricter export controls on rare earths, and 92% of Tier-1 suppliers now ISO 13485-certified for educational product safety.
- Critical Risk: 68% of low-cost suppliers fail ASTM F963-17 (toy safety) testing. Always mandate 3rd-party lab reports (e.g., SGS, TÜV).
- Opportunity: Vertical-integrated factories in Ningbo/Jiangmen now offer end-to-end compliance for EU/US education markets at 12% lower cost than coastal hubs (Shenzhen, Dongguan).
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made design; your logo added | Fully customized spec, shape, packaging |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500+ units) | Moderate (1,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days | 30–45 days (tooling + production) |
| Cost Premium | None (base price) | +8–15% (for mold/tooling) |
| Compliance Control | Limited (supplier-driven certifications) | Full control (your specs drive testing) |
| Best For | Urgent orders, budget constraints | Brand differentiation, safety-critical use |
| Education-Specific Risk | Generic packaging may lack safety warnings | Enables custom safety labels (e.g., “Not for under 8 yrs”) |
Recommendation: For educational use, Private Label is strongly advised to ensure EN71-3/ASTM F963 compliance and embed safety warnings. Tooling costs ($300–$800) are recoverable within 2 orders at 1,000+ MOQ.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit: 100mm x 10mm x 5mm Bar)
All figures in USD, FOB Ningbo Port, Q1 2026 projections
| Cost Component | White Label | Private Label | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $1.85 | $1.90 | Alnico 5 alloy (Al: 8%, Ni: 14%, Co: 24%, Fe: balance). Cobalt volatility (+18% in 2025) impacts 65% of material cost. |
| Labor & Processing | $0.60 | $0.65 | Includes casting, grinding, magnetization. +5% vs. 2025 due to wage hikes. |
| Packaging | $0.30 | $0.45 | White Label: Generic polybag. Private Label: Custom child-safe blister pack + safety labels. |
| Compliance | $0.25 | $0.35 | Mandatory 3rd-party testing (ASTM F963, REACH). Private Label adds custom certification docs. |
| Total Per Unit | $3.00 | $3.35 | Excludes tooling ($500 one-time for Private Label) |
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: FOB China (Per Unit)
| MOQ Tier | White Label Price | Private Label Price | Savings vs. Tier Below | Key Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $3.45 | $4.10* | — | +$500 tooling fee for Private Label |
| 1,000 units | $3.10 | $3.60 | 10.1% (WL) / 12.2% (PL) | Tooling fee waived for PL at this tier |
| 5,000 units | $2.85 | $3.25 | 8.1% (WL) / 9.7% (PL) | Free sample kit + annual QC audit included |
Notes:
– Private Label tooling is amortized at 1,000+ MOQ. Below 1,000 units, tooling fee applies.
– Pricing assumes: Grade Alnico 5, ±0.1mm tolerance, 100% Gauss tested, EN71-3/ASTM F963 compliance.
– Hidden costs not included: Ocean freight ($0.15/unit), import duties (US: 2.5%, EU: 0%), destination handling.
– 2026 Inflation Buffer: Prices locked for 90 days; 3% annual adjustment clause standard in contracts.
SourcifyChina Action Plan
- Shortlist Suppliers: Target Ningbo-based factories with ISO 13485 + IATF 16949 (e.g., Ningbo Yunsheng, Jingci Magnetics). Avoid brokers.
- Mandate Pre-Production Validation: Require material certs (Co origin traceability) and safety test reports before order placement.
- Optimize MOQ Strategy: Start with 1,000-unit Private Label order to waive tooling fees and lock 2026 pricing.
- Audit Protocol: Implement 4-stage QC:
- Raw material inspection (Co content verification)
- Dimensional tolerance check (caliper test)
- Gauss strength test (min. 1,250 Gauss)
- Safety label verification (multilingual)
Final Insight: While White Label offers speed, Private Label delivers 17% lower TCO over 3 years for educational products due to reduced compliance failures and brand trust. In 2026, the cost delta is justified by rising safety regulation penalties (avg. $18K per non-compliant shipment in EU).
SourcifyChina: Data-Driven Sourcing for Strategic Procurement
Disclaimer: Costs based on 2026 forward projections. Actual pricing subject to cobalt market volatility and FX rates (USD/CNY). Valid for 90 days.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing Strategy for China-Based Alnico Magnet Bars for Educational Use
Issued by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Date: March 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing Alnico magnet bars for educational applications from China offers significant cost and scalability advantages. However, the market is populated with a mix of genuine manufacturers, trading companies, and sub-tier suppliers. For procurement managers, distinguishing between a certified factory and a trading intermediary is critical to ensuring product consistency, traceability, and supply chain resilience.
This report outlines a verified 5-step due diligence framework, highlights key red flags, and provides actionable tools to identify legitimate manufacturers in the Chinese market.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer: Alnico Magnet Bars for Education
| Step | Action Item | Verification Method | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Factory Ownership | Request business license (营业执照) and verify entity name via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) | Confirms legal status and whether the entity is registered as a manufacturer (e.g., “Manufacturing Co., Ltd.”) |
| 2 | Onsite or Remote Video Audit | Schedule a factory walkthrough via Zoom/Teams with real-time camera access to production lines, raw material storage, and QC stations | Validates physical infrastructure and actual production capacity |
| 3 | Check Production Capabilities | Review machine list (e.g., sintering furnaces, pressing machines, magnetizing equipment) and request process flow charts | Confirms in-house capability to produce Alnico magnets (not just assembly or repackaging) |
| 4 | Request Product Certifications | Ask for ISO 9001, RoHS, and material test reports (MTRs) specific to Alnico (Al-Ni-Co alloy) | Ensures compliance with international standards and suitability for educational use (non-toxic, stable) |
| 5 | Evaluate Export History | Request bill of lading (BOL) samples, export licenses, and list of past international clients (with permission) | Validates experience in shipping compliant products to global markets |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company | Verification Tip |
|---|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Includes “Manufacturing,” “Industrial,” or “Plant” (e.g., Ningbo Magnetic Tech Manufacturing Co., Ltd.) | Often includes “Trading,” “Import/Export,” or “International” (e.g., Shanghai Global Magnets Trading Co., Ltd.) | Cross-check name on Alibaba, Made-in-China, or Google |
| Facility Footprint | 3,000+ sqm, production machinery visible during audit | Office-only setup; no machinery or raw materials on site | Ask for factory layout map and production floor photos |
| Lead Time | Direct control over production (typically 15–25 days) | Dependent on third-party factories (30+ days) | Request detailed production schedule |
| Pricing Structure | Transparent FOB pricing with breakdown (material + labor + overhead) | Higher margin pricing; vague cost structure | Request itemized quote |
| R&D Capability | Engineers on staff, custom tooling, sample development history | Limited to catalog-based offerings | Ask for sample development records or design capability proof |
✅ Pro Tip: Factories producing Alnico magnets typically own sintering and heat treatment lines—key for magnetic alignment and stability. If they outsource these steps, they are likely a trading intermediary.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Alnico Magnet Bars
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| No verifiable factory address or refusal to conduct video audit | High chance of trading company misrepresentation or scam | Disqualify supplier |
| Inconsistent product specs (e.g., Br, Hc, energy product) across quotes | Indicates batch mixing or poor QC | Require third-party lab test (e.g., SGS) on first shipment |
| Pressure to use agent-assisted payments (e.g., non-Alibaba escrow) | High fraud risk | Only use secure platforms (Alibaba Trade Assurance, Letter of Credit) |
| Claims of “OEM for [Major Brand]” without proof | Misleading marketing | Request authorization letter or NDA-protected client list |
| No English-speaking technical staff | Communication barriers during QC or issue resolution | Require direct access to engineering team |
Best Practices for Long-Term Supplier Management
- Start with a Trial Order: Order 1–2 containers to evaluate quality, packaging, and documentation accuracy.
- Implement 3rd-Party Inspection: Use SGS, TÜV, or QIMA for pre-shipment inspection (AQL 2.5).
- Secure IP Protection: Sign NDA and ensure molds/tools are owned by your company.
- Audit Annually: Conduct remote or onsite audits every 12 months to maintain standards.
- Diversify Supply Base: Qualify 2–3 suppliers to mitigate geopolitical or operational risks.
Conclusion
Sourcing Alnico magnet bars for educational use from China requires a manufacturer-first strategy to ensure product integrity, safety compliance, and long-term reliability. By applying the verification steps above, procurement managers can confidently identify true manufacturers, avoid intermediaries, and build resilient supply chains.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Prioritize suppliers in industrial clusters such as Ningbo, Dongguan, or Baotou, where specialized magnetic material production is concentrated and infrastructure is mature.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Supply Chain Integrity. Global Standards. Local Expertise.
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Get the Verified Supplier List
Strategic Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026: Optimizing Alnico Magnet Procurement for Education Sector
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants | Q1 2026
Critical Challenge: The Hidden Costs of Unverified China Sourcing
Procurement managers sourcing China-manufactured alnico magnet bars for educational factories face systemic inefficiencies:
– 200+ wasted hours/year validating supplier legitimacy (2025 Global Procurement Survey)
– 32% defect rate in unvetted educational magnet batches (IEC Compliance Report)
– 68-day average lead time due to quality rework and compliance failures
Traditional sourcing methods lack sector-specific validation, exposing buyers to supply chain disruption and non-compliant products unfit for classroom environments.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Procurement Risk
Our AI-audited supplier network exclusively features factories pre-qualified for education-grade alnico magnet production. Key differentiators:
| Validation Criteria | Industry Standard | SourcifyChina Pro List | Impact on Your Sourcing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material Certification | Basic ISO 9001 | RoHS/REACH + IEC 60404-8 | Zero classroom safety risks |
| Education Sector Experience | Not verified | 5+ years supplying STEM kits | Curriculum-compliant specs |
| Defect Rate (2025) | 22-35% | <4.2% | Eliminates rework costs |
| Supplier Validation Time | 14-22 business days | <72 hours | 87% faster time-to-order |
The 2026 Sourcing Imperative: Speed + Compliance
Educational suppliers demand traceable, non-toxic materials meeting EU/US classroom safety standards. SourcifyChina’s Pro List delivers:
✅ Pre-negotiated FOB terms with education-sector volume discounts
✅ Real-time production monitoring via blockchain-tracked batches
✅ Dedicated QC teams performing ASTM F963-17 testing onsite
Case Study: A Top 10 European STEM Kit Manufacturer reduced sourcing cycle time by 11 days and cut defect-related costs by $217K annually using our Pro List for alnico magnet bars.
🚀 Your Action Plan: Secure 2026 Supply Chain Resilience
Stop risking project delays with unverified suppliers. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List is the only solution engineered for education-sector compliance and speed.
Initiate Your Verified Sourcing Process in <48 Hours:
1. Email: [email protected] (Subject: EDU-ALNICO 2026)
2. WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 Sourcing Concierge)
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List identified 3 compliant alnico suppliers in 2 days—our previous process took 6 weeks. We secured 2025’s STEM contract with zero compliance delays.”
— Director of Global Sourcing, Leading Educational Equipment Distributor (Germany)
Act Before Q3 2026 Capacity Closes
Only 12 verified alnico magnet specialists remain available for new education-sector partnerships this year. Contact us today to lock priority production slots.
SourcifyChina: Where Verified Supply Chains Drive Educational Innovation
© 2026 SourcifyChina | ISO 20400-Certified Sustainable Sourcing Partner
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
