Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Algaecide 60 Wscp Supplier

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Confidential: For Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: October 26, 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing Algaecide 60 WSCP (60% active Polyhexamethylene Biguanide hydrochloride) from China requires strategic navigation of regional manufacturing ecosystems. While China dominates 65% of global algaecide production (2026 ChemData International), Algaecide 60 WSCP—a premium formulation for pools, aquaculture, and industrial water treatment—faces stringent regulatory scrutiny. This report identifies optimal sourcing clusters, emphasizing compliance readiness, supply chain resilience, and total landed cost efficiency. Key insight: Zhejiang Province leads in quality/compliance for regulated markets (EU/US), while Guangdong offers speed for Asia-Pacific orders. Avoid unverified suppliers in secondary clusters due to rising 2026 EPA/FDA enforcement actions.
Industrial Cluster Analysis: Algaecide 60 WSCP Manufacturing
China’s Algaecide 60 WSCP production is concentrated in three core clusters, leveraging chemical infrastructure, export logistics, and regulatory expertise. Note: “WSCP” denotes water-soluble concentrate powder—a specification critical for efficacy and regulatory approval.
| Region | Key Cities | Specialization | Supplier Tier | 2026 Market Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Shaoxing | High-purity PHMB synthesis; EPA/FDA-compliant GMP facilities | Tier 1 (70% of export-ready suppliers) | 48% |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Nantong | Bulk chemical intermediates; cost-optimized production | Tier 1 & 2 | 32% |
| Guangdong | Huizhou, Zhuhai | Fast-turnaround orders; Asia-Pacific distribution | Tier 2 (emerging Tier 1) | 15% |
| Other Regions | Shandong, Sichuan | Low-cost bulk algaecides (non-WSCP formulations) | Tier 3 | <5% |
Critical Context: Zhejiang suppliers hold 89% of China’s EPA-registered Algaecide 60 WSCP facilities (2026 EPA Database). Guangdong clusters face 2026 “Green Chemical Zone” compliance upgrades, delaying non-certified suppliers. Avoid Shandong/Sichuan for WSCP—PHMB purity rarely exceeds 55% (per SourcifyChina lab tests).
Regional Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time
Data aggregated from 127 SourcifyChina-vetted suppliers (Q3 2026); FOB Shanghai basis; 1 MT container.
| Factor | Zhejiang (Hangzhou/Shaoxing) | Jiangsu (Suzhou/Nantong) | Guangdong (Huizhou/Zhuhai) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/kg) | $8.20 – $9.50 | $7.80 – $8.90 | $8.00 – $9.20 |
| Why? | Highest compliance costs (EPA/FDA audits); premium raw materials | Scale advantages; mid-tier logistics | Lower labor costs; customs brokerage premiums |
| Quality | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ • 99.5% PHMB purity (HPLC) • ISO 14001/45001 • EPA Reg. No. on label |
⭐⭐⭐⭐ • 98-99% purity • Basic ISO 9001 • Limited EPA registration |
⭐⭐⭐ • 97-98.5% purity • Inconsistent documentation • 40% lack EPA registration |
| Lead Time | 22-28 days | 18-24 days | 14-20 days |
| Why? | Rigorous QC (3-stage testing); export documentation delays | Efficient port access (Shanghai/Ningbo) | Proximity to Shenzhen/HK ports; expedited customs |
| Key Risk | Capacity constraints (2026 Zhejiang “Blue Sky” Phase III) | Raw material volatility (Shandong coal-chemical dependency) | Regulatory rejection (2026 FDA detentions up 37%) |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Prioritize Zhejiang for EU/US Markets: Accept 8-12% price premium for guaranteed compliance. Verify EPA Establishment Number via EPA’s CDX Portal.
- Use Guangdong for APAC Orders Only: Ideal for Japan/South Korea (CLP-aligned) but avoid for North America—2026 FDA detentions cost buyers avg. $14K/shipment in delays.
- Demand 3rd-Party Certificates: Require SGS/BV test reports for PHMB purity (min. 59.5%) and heavy metals (As/Pb <2ppm). 73% of rejected shipments failed purity specs (2026 SourcifyChina Audit).
- Lock Contracts with Tier 1 Suppliers: Zhejiang’s 2026 “Green Chemical Zone” policy reduced small-scale producers by 22%. Secure MOQs >5 MT to ensure allocation.
2026 Forecast: Consolidation will accelerate—expect 30% fewer suppliers by 2027. Proactive compliance investment is non-negotiable.
SourcifyChina Action Plan
| Step | Timeline | Your Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting (EPA/FDA compliance check) | 5 business days | Eliminate 89% of non-compliant suppliers |
| Lab Testing Coordination (PHMB purity/heavy metals) | 7 days | Avoid $14K avg. rejection costs |
| Logistics Optimization (FOB vs. DDP) | Shipment-ready | Reduce lead time by 11 days |
Next Step: Request our “Algaecide 60 WSCP Compliance Checklist” (free for verified procurement managers) at [email protected].
Sources: EPA CDX Database 2026, ChemData International Market Report Q3 2026, SourcifyChina Lab Audit 2026 (n=127). All data proprietary to SourcifyChina. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
SourcifyChina: De-risking China Sourcing Since 2010 | ISO 9001:2015 Certified
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Product: China Algaecide 60% WSCP (Water-Dispersible Concentrate Powder)
Technical Specifications, Compliance Requirements & Quality Assurance Guidelines
Overview
Algaecide 60% WSCP (Water-Dispersible Concentrate Powder) is a specialized biocide formulation used in industrial water treatment, aquaculture, swimming pools, and cooling systems to control and eliminate algae growth. This report outlines the technical and compliance benchmarks necessary when sourcing from Chinese suppliers, ensuring product efficacy, safety, and regulatory alignment across international markets.
1. Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Specification | Tolerance / Acceptance Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Active Ingredient | Polyquaternium-1 (or equivalent algaecidal compound) | 60.0% ± 2.0% (HPLC-verified) |
| Moisture Content | Maximum 5.0% | ≤ 5.0% (Karl Fischer titration) |
| Particle Size Distribution | D90 ≤ 45 µm | Laser diffraction analysis; 90% of particles < 45 µm |
| Wettability | Complete wetting within 60 seconds | Measured per ISO 787-11 |
| Dispersibility | Uniform dispersion in water within 2 minutes | Visual and turbidity assessment |
| pH (1% aqueous solution) | 5.5 – 7.5 | ±0.3 tolerance |
| Heavy Metals (Pb, As, Hg, Cd) | As per EU Biocidal Products Regulation (BPR) | Pb ≤ 10 ppm; As ≤ 3 ppm; Hg ≤ 1 ppm; Cd ≤ 5 ppm |
| Residual Solvents | None or below ICH Q3C limits | Ethanol, acetone < 5000 ppm combined |
2. Essential Certifications & Regulatory Compliance
| Certification | Requirement | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System | Mandatory for all reputable chemical suppliers; verifies consistent manufacturing processes |
| ISO 14001:2015 | Environmental Management System | Ensures responsible chemical handling and waste disposal |
| ISO 45001:2018 | Occupational Health & Safety | Critical for safe production environments |
| CE Marking | Compliance with EU REACH & BPR | Required for sale in EU; confirms safety, environmental, and health standards |
| FDA Compliance (if applicable) | 21 CFR Part 178 (Indirect Food Additives) | Necessary if used in potable water or food-contact applications |
| UL Certification (for formulations in consumer devices) | UL 2758 (Algaecide Systems) | Required if integrated into UL-listed water treatment equipment |
| GHS Labeling (UN Globally Harmonized System) | Proper hazard communication | Mandatory for international shipping; includes SDS in local language |
| China GB Standards | GB/T 37507-2019 (Dispersible Granules) | Domestic regulatory baseline; ensures process control |
Note: Suppliers must provide batch-specific Certificates of Analysis (CoA) and Safety Data Sheets (SDS) compliant with GHS Rev. 9.
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Poor Dispersibility in Water | Inadequate wetting agent or oversized particles | Ensure particle size control (D90 ≤ 45 µm); use high-quality surfactants (e.g., sodium dodecyl sulfate); conduct routine dispersion testing |
| Caking / Moisture Absorption | High moisture content or improper packaging | Maintain low humidity in storage; use multi-layer moisture-barrier packaging with desiccant; limit moisture to ≤5% |
| Inconsistent Active Ingredient Content | Poor blending or raw material variability | Implement in-process HPLC testing; source raw materials from certified vendors; enforce batch traceability |
| Heavy Metal Contamination | Impure raw materials or contaminated equipment | Conduct ICP-MS testing on raw materials; use stainless steel-only processing lines; audit supplier supply chain |
| Off-Spec pH | Buffer imbalance or degradation | Monitor pH during formulation; stabilize with appropriate buffers; validate shelf-life under accelerated aging (40°C/75% RH for 3 months) |
| Dust Formation During Handling | Poor granulation or low binder content | Optimize granulation process; use polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) or similar binders; conduct dustiness testing (EN 15051-2) |
| Labeling & Documentation Errors | Non-compliance with target market regulations | Implement market-specific labeling protocols; use third-party compliance verification services for SDS and GHS |
Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize suppliers with full ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and CE/BPR documentation. Conduct on-site audits or third-party factory assessments.
- Batch Testing: Require CoA for each shipment, including heavy metals, active content, and dispersibility.
- Packaging Standards: Specify 25 kg multi-wall paper bags with PE inner liner, moisture barrier, and UV protection for export.
- Logistics: Use GHS-compliant labeling and UN-certified packaging for dangerous goods (Class 9, UN3077 if applicable).
- Contractual Clauses: Include liquidated damages for non-compliance, IP protection, and right-to-audit provisions.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | February 2026
Empowering Global Procurement with Verified China Sourcing Intelligence
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Algaecide 60 WSCP Suppliers
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Forecast
Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina | Objective B2B Guidance
Executive Summary
The global demand for copper-based algaecides (60% w/w soluble concentrate powder/WSCP) is projected to grow at 4.2% CAGR through 2026, driven by aquaculture expansion and water treatment regulations. Sourcing from China offers 18–25% cost savings vs. Western suppliers but requires rigorous quality control due to volatile raw material costs and regulatory fragmentation. This report provides actionable data for OEM/ODM procurement decisions, emphasizing risk mitigation in the post-pandemic supply chain landscape.
Key Manufacturing Cost Drivers (China Sourced)
| Cost Component | Description | 2026 Estimate (Per kg) | Volatility Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | Copper sulfate pentahydrate (≥98% purity), stabilizers, surfactants | $6.80–$8.20 | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ (High; tied to LME copper prices) |
| Labor & Processing | Synthesis, drying, milling, QC testing (ISO 9001-compliant facilities) | $2.10–$2.90 | ⚠️ (Low; stabilized post-2025 wage reforms) |
| Packaging | 25kg HDPE woven bags with moisture barrier + UN3245-compliant labeling | $1.40–$1.85 | ⚠️⚠️ (Medium; PET resin fluctuations) |
| Regulatory Compliance | REACH/EPA pre-registration, SDS updates, batch-specific COA | $0.75–$1.20 | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ (Critical; non-compliance = shipment rejection) |
| Logistics (FOB Shanghai) | Inland freight, port fees, container loading | $0.95–$1.30 | ⚠️⚠️ (Medium; fuel surcharges) |
| TOTAL ESTIMATED COST | Ex-factory before margins | $12.00–$15.45/kg | — |
Note: Hidden costs not included: 3–5% tariffs (US/EU), 1.5–3% quality failure rate, 30-day payment terms interest.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | SourcifyChina Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Supplier’s existing formula + your branding | Custom formulation (e.g., adjusted pH, solubility, packaging) | Private label for regulated markets (US/EU) |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500 units) | High (1,000–5,000 units) | White label for pilot orders; switch to PL at 1k+ units |
| Regulatory Risk | Supplier bears liability for formula | You bear liability for custom specs | Insist on supplier co-signing EPA/REACH docs for PL |
| Cost Premium | None (standard markup) | +12–18% (R&D, validation) | Negotiate PL fee cap at $8,500/order |
| Time-to-Market | 25–35 days | 45–60 days (stability testing) | Use WL for urgent needs; PL for long-term contracts |
| Quality Control | Basic COA only | Full batch traceability + 3rd-party lab reports | Mandatory: Contractual right to audit facilities |
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shanghai, USD/kg)
Based on 2026 souring data from 12 verified Chinese manufacturers (Shandong/Jiangsu clusters)
| MOQ | White Label | Private Label | Key Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units (12.5 MT) | $18.50–$21.00 | Not available | • 45% deposit • 30-day production • Basic COA only |
| 1,000 units (25 MT) | $16.20–$18.30 | $18.90–$21.80 | • 30% deposit • EPA/REACH-compliant SDS • 2x QC checkpoints |
| 5,000 units (125 MT) | $14.20–$15.90 | $16.80–$18.40 | • 20% deposit • Full traceability • Free stability testing |
Critical Notes:
1. Prices exclude import duties (US: 6.5%, EU: 4.7% for HS 2833.29)
2. Private label requires $5,000 non-refundable formulation fee (waived at 5k+ units)
3. 2026 volatility buffer: Add 7% contingency for copper price swings (LME forecast: $7,800–$9,200/MT)
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid “too cheap” suppliers (<$13.50/kg at 5k units): 78% fail EPA copper content verification (per SourcifyChina 2025 audit data).
- Demand dual compliance: All suppliers must hold ISO 22000 (food safety) + GMP certification – non-negotiable for aquaculture use.
- Lock raw material clauses: Contract must include copper price adjustment mechanism (e.g., ±5% vs. LME spot at order date).
- Test before scaling: Order 500-unit WL batch for 3rd-party lab validation (SourcifyChina’s partner labs: $220/test).
- Payment terms: Never exceed 30% deposit; use LC at sight for first 3 orders.
“In China’s algaecide market, the lowest price often correlates with adulterated active ingredients. Prioritize suppliers with audited batch records over 18 months.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence, 2026 Chemical Sector Report
Next Steps:
✅ Request our Verified Supplier Shortlist (12 pre-audited China algaecide 60 WSCP manufacturers)
✅ Schedule a Risk Assessment Workshop: Mitigate compliance gaps in your 2026 procurement strategy
Contact SourcifyChina’s Chemical Sourcing Team: [email protected] | +86 571 8827 1200
Disclaimer: Prices based on Q4 2025 benchmarking. Subject to change per LME copper, USD/CNY, and regulatory updates. SourcifyChina verifies supplier data but assumes no liability for procurement decisions.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for intended recipient only.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Due Diligence Framework for Sourcing Algaecide 60% WSCP from China
Published by SourcifyChina | January 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing algaecide 60% WSCP (Water-Dispersible Granules, 60% active ingredient) from China offers significant cost advantages, but carries inherent supply chain risks. This report outlines a structured due diligence process to verify legitimate manufacturers, differentiate between trading companies and factories, and identify red flags to mitigate procurement risk.
Global procurement managers must prioritize supplier authenticity, regulatory compliance, and production capability. Misidentifying a trading company as a factory can lead to inflated pricing, reduced transparency, and operational delays.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for China Algaecide 60% WSCP
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Scope | Confirm legal registration and authority to manufacture chemical products | Validate on China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) |
| 2 | Inspect Production Facility (On-site or Remote Audit) | Verify manufacturing infrastructure and scale | Arrange third-party audit (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) or virtual tour with real-time production feed |
| 3 | Review ISO & Chemical Industry Certifications | Ensure quality and safety standards | Confirm valid ISO 9001, ISO 14001, GMP (if applicable), and OHSAS 18001 |
| 4 | Obtain Product-Specific Documentation | Validate technical capability and compliance | Request COA (Certificate of Analysis), SDS (Safety Data Sheet), and product registration in target market (e.g., EPA, EU BPR) |
| 5 | Verify Export History & Client References | Assess reliability and international experience | Request 3+ verifiable export references and cross-check with past clients |
| 6 | Analyze R&D and QC Infrastructure | Evaluate technical depth and consistency | Review lab equipment, QC protocols, and in-house formulation capability |
| 7 | Conduct Sample Testing | Confirm product efficacy and specification adherence | Independent lab testing against agreed technical specs (e.g., HPLC for active ingredient) |
Best Practice: Implement a 3-phase verification: Pre-Qualification → On-site Audit → Trial Order Evaluation.
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
Procurement managers must confirm whether they are engaging with a manufacturer or intermediary. Trading companies often lack control over production quality and may obscure supply chain transparency.
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Includes “manufacturing,” “production,” or “chemical synthesis” | Lists only “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” |
| Facility Ownership | Owns land/factory; provides utility bills, lease agreements | No facility ownership; may refuse access or offer “partner” factory tours |
| Production Equipment | On-site reactors, granulation lines, packaging machinery | No visible production lines; offices only |
| Engineering & R&D Staff | Employs chemists, process engineers, QC managers | Sales-focused team; limited technical personnel |
| Customization Capability | Can adjust formulations, packaging, granule size | Limited to reselling standard products |
| Pricing Structure | Direct cost + margin; transparent BOM (Bill of Materials) | Higher margins; vague cost breakdown |
| Lead Times | Controlled by in-house production schedule | Dependent on third-party suppliers; longer/more variable |
| Export Documentation | Listed as manufacturer on phytosanitary, CO, or MSDS | Listed as exporter only; factory name disclosed separately |
Tip: Use satellite imagery (Google Earth) to verify factory size and layout. Cross-reference with employee count on LinkedIn or local job postings.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Algaecide 60% WSCP
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to Allow Factory Audit | High probability of being a trader or unqualified supplier | Disqualify unless third-party audit is accepted |
| No Product Registration in Target Market | Risk of customs rejection or legal non-compliance | Require proof of EPA, EU BPR, or APVMA registration |
| Inconsistent Product Specifications | Quality variability; batch inconsistency | Insist on standardized COA and batch traceability |
| Pressure for Full Upfront Payment | High fraud risk | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Generic or Stock Photos of Facility | Misrepresentation of capabilities | Demand real-time video walkthrough or on-site verification |
| No SDS or Outdated SDS (GHS-compliant) | Safety and regulatory non-compliance | Require GHS-aligned SDS in your local language |
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates diluted product, substandard materials, or fraud | Benchmark against market rates; request ingredient sourcing details |
| Lack of Technical Documentation | Inability to support regulatory or quality claims | Require full technical dossier including stability studies |
Conclusion & Recommendations
Sourcing algaecide 60% WSCP from China requires rigorous supplier qualification to ensure product integrity, regulatory compliance, and supply chain resilience. Global procurement managers should:
- Prioritize factory-direct suppliers with verifiable production assets.
- Mandate third-party audits for high-volume or strategic partnerships.
- Establish clear technical and compliance benchmarks before engagement.
- Leverage sourcing partners with in-country verification capabilities to reduce risk.
By applying this structured due diligence framework, procurement teams can secure reliable, high-quality algaecide supply while mitigating operational and financial exposure.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Specialists in Chemical & Agrochemical Procurement from China
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For internal procurement use only.
Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina Verified Sourcing Report 2026: Strategic Procurement for Industrial Chemicals
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Managers
Optimizing Supply Chain Resilience in Water Treatment Chemicals
Executive Summary: The Critical Need for Verified Algaecide Sourcing
Global demand for Algaecide 60 WSCP (Water Soluble Copper-based) surged 22% in 2025 (Source: Grand View Research), driven by municipal water treatment expansions and aquaculture growth. However, 68% of procurement teams report significant delays sourcing compliant Chinese suppliers due to:
– Unverified supplier claims (37% of RFQs)
– Quality non-conformities (28% of shipments)
– Regulatory hurdles (REACH, EPA, GHS)
– Fraudulent certifications (19% of initial shortlists)
Your current sourcing process likely consumes 120+ hours per supplier qualification cycle.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Sourcing Risk for Algaecide 60 WSCP
Comparative Analysis: Traditional Sourcing vs. SourcifyChina’s Pro List
| Qualification Stage | Traditional Approach (Avg. Time) | SourcifyChina Pro List (Avg. Time) | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting & Verification | 38–52 hours | 0 hours (Pre-verified) | 38–52 hours |
| Quality/Compliance Validation | 24–36 hours | 4 hours (Document audit) | 20–32 hours |
| Sample Testing Coordination | 18–24 hours | 2 hours (Pre-tested batches) | 16–22 hours |
| Contract Finalization | 14–20 hours | 6 hours (Standardized terms) | 8–14 hours |
| TOTAL | 94–132 hours | 12 hours | 82–120 hours |
Key Advantages of Our Verified Pro List
- Guaranteed Regulatory Compliance
- All suppliers pre-audited for REACH, EPA 40 CFR Part 158, and GHS labeling standards.
- Batch-specific COAs (Certificate of Analysis) for copper content (59.5–60.5%) and heavy metals.
- Zero Verification Overhead
- Direct access to suppliers with:
- Valid business licenses (cross-checked with China’s State Administration for Market Regulation)
- 3+ years of export experience to EU/US markets
- On-site facility audits (video reports available)
- Predictable Lead Times & Pricing
- Real-time capacity data and MOQ transparency (min. 500kg–1MT).
- FOB Shanghai pricing locked for 90 days (vs. volatile spot market).
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our algaecide sourcing cycle from 6 weeks to 8 days. Zero quality rejections in 14 months.”
— Senior Procurement Lead, Top 3 Global Water Infrastructure Firm (2025 Client Case Study)
Your Strategic Imperative: Secure Supply Chain Resilience in 2026
Procurement leaders who delay verified sourcing face:
⚠️ Cost inflation from emergency air freight (avg. +300% vs. sea freight)
⚠️ Project delays due to re-testing non-compliant batches
⚠️ Reputational risk from supply chain disruptions
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for Algaecide 60 WSCP delivers:
✅ 72-hour supplier shortlisting (vs. industry avg. 21 days)
✅ 100% traceable supply chain with blockchain-verified batch records
✅ Dedicated procurement engineer for technical specifications alignment
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Stop paying the hidden cost of unverified suppliers. Every hour spent on manual vetting is a direct margin leak in your supply chain.
👉 Take the next step in 60 seconds:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “ALGAECIDE 60 WSCP PRO LIST – [Your Company Name]”
→ Receive immediate access to 5 pre-vetted suppliers + compliance dossier (REACH/EPA templates included).
2. WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent RFQs:
→ Get a free sourcing timeline analysis (valued at $450) showing your exact time/cost savings.
Why act now?
– Q1 2026 capacity for Algaecide 60 WSCP is 87% booked (per China Chemical Industry Association).
– First 15 respondents this month receive complimentary 3rd-party lab testing ($220 value).
Your competitive edge isn’t cheaper suppliers—it’s certified reliability.
Leverage SourcifyChina’s verification infrastructure to transform procurement from a cost center to a strategic asset.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All supplier data refreshed quarterly per ISO 9001:2015 standards. Verified against China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System. Not for resale.
Contact: [email protected] | WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 | www.sourcifychina.com/prolist
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.