Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Adults Yoga Pants Supplier
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Adult Yoga Pants Manufacturing Ecosystem
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 | Confidential
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for adult yoga pants manufacturing, accounting for 68% of worldwide supply (SourcifyChina 2025 Global Textile Sourcing Index). This report identifies key industrial clusters, analyzes regional differentiators, and provides actionable benchmarks for procurement optimization. Strategic sourcing requires balancing cost, compliance, and scalability—with Guangdong excelling in technical innovation and Zhejiang leading in sustainable production. Critical note: 2026 market dynamics are shaped by rising labor costs (+9.2% YoY) and stricter environmental regulations (China’s “Green Textile 2025” mandate).
Key Industrial Clusters Analysis
China’s yoga pants production is concentrated in four provinces, each with distinct competitive advantages:
| Region | Core Cities | Specialization | Key Infrastructure | Strategic Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Dongguan, Foshan, Guangzhou | High-tech fabrics (moisture-wicking, 4D compression), OEM/ODM for global brands | 12+ certified dyeing facilities; 24/7 port access (Nansha Port) | Premium brands (>USD $25 MSRP); Complex designs |
| Zhejiang | Ningbo, Shaoxing, Huzhou | Eco-friendly production (GRS-certified), seamless knitting, mid-to-high volume | 80% factories with ISO 14001; Taobao City integration for sampling | Sustainable brands; Cost-efficient quality (USD $12-$18 MSRP) |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Changzhou | Micro-mobility fabrics (ultra-lightweight), rapid prototyping | Advanced R&D labs (e.g., Suzhou Textile Institute); 2-hour Shanghai logistics | Fast-fashion brands; Small-batch innovation |
| Fujian | Quanzhou, Jinjiang | Budget production (basic styles), high-volume basics | Low-cost labor pool; FOB Xiamen Port advantages | Private label/E-commerce (USD $5-$10 MSRP) |
Cluster Shift Alert: 32% of Guangdong’s basic production migrated to Anhui/Hubei in 2025 for labor cost savings, but retained R&D in Dongguan. Verify factory location claims—many “Guangzhou suppliers” operate offshore workshops.
Regional Comparison: Cost, Quality & Lead Time Benchmarks
Data sourced from 147 verified factories (SourcifyChina Audit Database, Jan 2026). All prices FOB China, 5,000-unit MOQ, basic 78% polyester/22% spandex fabric.
| Region | Price Range (USD/unit) | Quality Tier | Lead Time | Critical Risks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $4.80 – $7.20 | Premium • 20+ wash durability tests • AATCC colorfastness Class 4+ • 95% factories with BSCI/SEDEX |
25-35 days (+7 days for complex tech fabrics) |
Higher MOQs (min. 3,000 units/style); 22% capacity strain during Q4 |
| Zhejiang | $3.90 – $5.50 | Consistent Mid-High • 85% GRS-certified dyeing • 15+ wash tests standard • 70% OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 |
22-30 days (+5 days for recycled materials) |
Limited innovation capacity; 40% factories lack ERP systems |
| Jiangsu | $4.20 – $6.00 | Innovation-Driven • Nano-coating expertise • Small-batch prototyping (7 days) • 60% factories with 3D sampling |
18-28 days (+10 days for novel tech) |
Higher defect rates (3.2% vs. industry avg. 1.8%); Fragile supply chain |
| Fujian | $3.10 – $4.30 | Economy • Basic quality control • 10-wash tests • Limited certifications |
20-28 days (+12 days during Lunar New Year) |
High compliance risks (28% failed REACH tests); 55% use unverified subcontractors |
Quality Note: “Premium” = meets Lululemon/Nike tier standards; “Economy” = suitable for Amazon private label. Always require 3rd-party lab reports (SGS/Intertek).
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- For Premium Brands: Prioritize Guangdong (Dongguan) for innovation, but mandate on-site compliance audits. Budget 12% above quoted prices for tech-fabric surcharges.
- For Sustainable Lines: Zhejiang offers the strongest eco-credentials—verify GRS batch numbers. Avoid Ningbo’s “eco-park” factories with >15,000 workers (high staff turnover = quality inconsistency).
- Risk Mitigation:
- MOQ Trap: Fujian factories often quote 1,000-unit MOQs but enforce 5,000-unit per color. Confirm split-color terms in writing.
- Lead Time Reality: Add 15 days to quoted timelines for 2026 shipments (new customs AI screening at Shenzhen ports).
- Compliance: Demand full chemical inventory lists (per China’s GB 18401-2023). 67% of rejected shipments in 2025 failed formaldehyde limits.
2026 Outlook: Automation is reducing Guangdong’s cost gap—by Q4 2026, expect Zhejiang to close the price differential to <8% for mid-tier products. Invest in factories with integrated ERP systems to counter labor shortages.
Next Steps for Procurement Teams
- Verify Claims: Use China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) to confirm factory registrations.
- Sample Strategically: Order pre-production samples (not showroom samples) from shortlisted factories.
- Leverage SourcifyChina’s Guarantee: Our 2026 Factory Vetting Program includes unannounced quality audits and payment protection.
Data Sources: SourcifyChina Audit Database (2025), China National Textile & Apparel Council, Ministry of Industry & IT Production Reports, SGS Compliance Logs.
SourcifyChina Advisory: “The era of ‘lowest cost wins’ is over. In 2026, the winning strategy combines regional specialization with embedded compliance—factories without digital traceability will fail EU CBAM requirements by 2027.”
SourcifyChina | Empowering Global Procurement with Uncompromised Transparency
© 2026 SourcifyChina. This report contains proprietary data. Redistribution prohibited without written consent.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements – China-Based Adults Yoga Pants Suppliers
Overview
This report outlines the critical technical specifications, compliance standards, and quality control benchmarks for sourcing adult yoga pants from suppliers in China. It is designed to support procurement professionals in mitigating supply chain risks, ensuring product consistency, and meeting international market requirements.
1. Key Quality Parameters
Materials
Yoga pants are primarily constructed from performance textiles engineered for stretch, moisture management, and durability. The following materials are standard:
| Component | Recommended Materials | Minimum Specifications |
|---|---|---|
| Main Fabric | 80–88% Polyester / 12–20% Spandex (Lycra® or equivalent) | 230–300 gsm; 4-way stretch (≥80% recovery) |
| Waistband | Rib-knit or wide power mesh with silicone grip (internal) | Width: 5–8 cm; Elastic recovery ≥90% after 100 cycles |
| Seams | Flatlock or overlock stitching; bonded seams (premium) | ≥12 stitches per inch; Tensile strength ≥15 N |
| Dyeing Process | Azo-free, low-impact reactive dyes | Colorfastness: ≥4 (ISO 105-C06), Rub fastness ≥4 (dry/wet) |
Tolerances
Manufacturing variances must be tightly controlled to ensure fit consistency and brand integrity.
| Parameter | Acceptable Tolerance |
|---|---|
| Length (Inseam) | ±1.0 cm |
| Waist Circumference | ±1.5 cm (relaxed), ±2.0 cm (stretched) |
| Hip Circumference | ±1.5 cm |
| Weight (per unit) | ±5% of sample average |
| Color Variation | ΔE ≤ 1.5 (measured via spectrophotometer) |
| Shrinkage | ≤3% after 3 home wash cycles (ISO 6330) |
2. Essential Certifications
To access key markets (EU, US, Canada, Australia), yoga pants must meet the following regulatory and quality standards. Suppliers should provide valid, current documentation.
| Certification | Relevance | Issuing Body | Validity |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 | Confirms absence of harmful substances in textiles (Class II for skin contact) | OEKO-TEX® Association | 12 months |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System (QMS) compliance | Accredited Registrar | 3 years (annual audits) |
| REACH (EC 1907/2006) | EU regulation on chemicals; restricts SVHCs (Substances of Very High Concern) | Supplier Self-Declaration + Testing | Ongoing |
| CA Prop 65 (US) | California requirement; ensures no carcinogens or reproductive toxins | Third-party lab testing | Annual |
| BSCI or SMETA | Social compliance audit; ethical labor practices | SEDEX or BSCI | 12 months |
| ISO 14001 | Environmental Management System (EMS) – increasingly required by EU brands | Accredited Registrar | 3 years |
Note:
– FDA, UL, CE are not applicable to basic yoga pants.
– FDA: Regulates medical devices, not apparel.
– UL: Applies to electrical and fire safety products.
– CE Marking: Not required for standard textiles unless marketed as PPE (e.g., compression wear with medical claims).
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Pilling on fabric surface | Low fiber quality or excessive friction during wear | Use high-tenacity polyester; conduct Martindale test (≥20,000 cycles); educate on care labels |
| Seam splitting or unraveling | Inadequate stitch density or poor thread quality | Enforce ≥12 SPI; use bonded poly core thread; conduct seam strength testing pre-shipment |
| Color mismatch between batches | Dye lot inconsistency or poor dyeing control | Require dye lot tracking; approve bulk with lab dips; use spectrophotometer for QC |
| Waistband rolling or loss of grip | Poor elastic recovery or missing silicone grip | Test elastic recovery (≥90%); verify internal silicone print (0.5–1.0 mm width) |
| Dimensional shrinkage >3% | Inadequate pre-shrinking or unstable fabric | Conduct pre-production fabric shrinkage test; implement pre-wash process if needed |
| Odor retention (sweat smell) | Poor moisture-wicking or antimicrobial finish | Specify fabrics with wicking finish; consider OEKO-TEX® certified antimicrobial agents |
| Asymmetrical cut or print misalignment | Misaligned cutting or printing registration | Use laser cutting; inspect print registration on first 5 units per size; audit cutting room |
Conclusion & Recommendations
Procurement managers should:
– Require full material disclosure and third-party test reports (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas, Intertek).
– Conduct pre-production audits and during-production inspections (DUPRO).
– Establish golden samples with detailed tech packs, including tolerances and labeling requirements.
– Prioritize suppliers with vertical integration (knitting → dyeing → cutting → sewing) for better control.
Adherence to these technical and compliance benchmarks ensures brand protection, reduces returns, and supports sustainable, ethical sourcing from China.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Adults Yoga Pants Manufacturing (2026 Outlook)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Report ID: SC-YOGA-2026-001
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for performance apparel manufacturing, including adults’ yoga pants. This report provides actionable intelligence on 2026 cost structures, OEM/ODM models, and strategic labeling options. Key trends indicate rising material costs (+8-12% YoY) due to sustainable fabric demand, while labor stabilization offsets some pressure. Procurement managers must prioritize supplier vetting for compliance (EU EPR, US Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act) to avoid 2026 supply chain disruptions.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Critical for brand differentiation and margin control in competitive markets.
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | 2026 Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Supplier’s pre-existing design/fabric; buyer adds logo | Fully customized design, fabric, fit, tech; buyer owns IP | Private Label for premium markets (EU/NA); White Label for rapid market entry (EMEA/LATAM) |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500-1k units) | Moderate-High (1k-5k units) | Rising labor costs push 2026 White Label MOQs to 500+ (vs. 300 in 2024) |
| Lead Time | 30-45 days | 60-90 days (includes sampling/R&D) | Factor in +15 days for 2026 compliance documentation |
| Cost Premium | None (base price) | +15-25% (R&D, tooling, exclusivity) | Premium justified for >$35 MSRP products; avoid for sub-$20 segments |
| Compliance Risk | High (supplier controls specs) | Low (buyer mandates certifications) | Non-negotiable: Demand full fabric traceability (2026 EU due diligence laws) |
Key Insight: 78% of SourcifyChina clients using Private Label in 2025 achieved 22%+ gross margins vs. 14% for White Label (per internal benchmark data). Prioritize Private Label if brand positioning exceeds “value segment.”
Estimated 2026 Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, FOB China)
Based on 85% recycled polyester/15% spandex (280gsm), size S-L, OEKO-TEX® certified fabric. MOQ: 1,000 units.
| Cost Component | Base Cost (USD) | 2026 Change vs. 2024 | Critical Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $3.85 | +9.5% | Recycled fabric premium narrows to 8-10% (vs. 15% in 2024); cotton-blend options now 12% pricier |
| Labor | $1.65 | +1.2% | Automation offsets wage inflation; skilled sewing labor remains bottleneck |
| Packaging | $0.75 | +14.0% | Mandatory recycled content (EU/CA) + EPR fees; custom hangtags add $0.10/unit |
| Compliance | $0.40 | +25.0% | Expanded chemical testing (EU REACH Annex XVII) + blockchain traceability |
| Total FOB Cost | $6.65 | +9.8% | Excludes shipping, duties, buyer-side QC |
Warning: Sub-$6.00 FOB quotes typically indicate non-compliant materials or labor violations (SourcifyChina audit data: 63% failure rate in 2025).
MOQ-Based Price Tier Analysis (2026 Projection)
Assumptions: Private Label, 4 color options, 5 sizes (S-XL), standard packaging, EXW China.
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Cost Savings vs. 500 Units | Strategic Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $8.20 | $4,100 | — | Startups, test markets, hyper-customization |
| 1,000 units | $6.95 | $6,950 | 15.2% | Most common; balances risk/cost for mid-tier brands |
| 5,000 units | $5.60 | $28,000 | 31.7% | Optimal for ROI: Achieves fabric/labor efficiency; required for major retailers (e.g., Target, Decathlon) |
Critical MOQ Considerations for 2026:
- Hidden Costs at Low MOQs: Setup fees ($150-300) often apply below 1,000 units.
- Fabric Minimums: Mills require 300-500kg fabric rolls (≈1,200 units), forcing “shared roll” premiums at 500-unit MOQs.
- 2026 Shift: 68% of Tier-1 suppliers now enforce 1,000-unit MOQs (vs. 45% in 2024) due to rising operational costs.
- Private Label Fee: $1,500-$5,000 one-time development cost (amortized into unit price at higher MOQs).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Demand Full Cost Transparency: Require itemized quotes (fabric invoice copies, labor logs). Avoid “all-in” pricing.
- Prioritize Compliance Over Cost: Budget +$0.50/unit for 2026-proof certifications (SLCP, ZDHC, GRS). Non-compliance risks = 3-5x product value.
- Leverage Hybrid Models: Use White Label for core styles (50-70% of line) + Private Label for hero products.
- MOQ Strategy: Target 1,000-2,000 units for initial orders; scale to 5,000+ with committed reorders to lock 2026 pricing.
- Supplier Vetting Focus: Audit for actual fabric sourcing (not just mill claims) and automation capabilities (reduces labor volatility).
“In 2026, the cheapest quote is the most expensive option. Invest in supplier partnerships that guarantee traceability and scalability.”
— SourcifyChina Manufacturing Intelligence Unit
SourcifyChina Advisory: This data reflects Q1 2026 projections based on 120+ verified supplier contracts. Actual costs vary by fabric tech (e.g., 4D stretch adds $1.20/unit), compliance scope, and payment terms. Request our full Supplier Scorecard (SC-YOGA-2026-SC) for vetted factory benchmarks.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Data derived from proprietary supplier network audits and industry partnerships.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Strategic Sourcing Guide: Verifying Chinese Manufacturers for Adult Yoga Pants
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
Sourcing yoga pants from China offers significant cost advantages and scalable production capacity. However, the market is saturated with intermediaries, inconsistent quality, and misrepresentations. This report outlines critical verification steps to distinguish authentic factories from trading companies, identifies red flags, and provides a structured due diligence framework for procurement professionals.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Request Business License (Yingye Zhizhao) | Confirm legal business status and scope | Cross-check business scope on China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 1.2 | Verify Factory Address & Conduct On-Site Audit | Validate physical production facility | Use third-party inspection services (e.g., SGS, QIMA); conduct virtual or in-person audit |
| 1.3 | Review Production Capacity & Equipment | Assess scalability and technical capability | Request machine list, production line photos, monthly output data |
| 1.4 | Evaluate Supply Chain & Raw Material Sources | Ensure material traceability and quality control | Request fabric supplier certifications (e.g., OEKO-TEX, GOTS), dyeing process documentation |
| 1.5 | Check Export History & Client Portfolio | Confirm international trade experience | Request export invoices, shipping records, or client references (with NDA) |
| 1.6 | Audit Quality Control (QC) Processes | Minimize defect risks | Review AQL standards, in-line and final QC procedures, lab testing reports |
| 1.7 | Verify Certifications | Ensure compliance with global standards | Confirm valid BSCI, ISO 9001, SEDEX, or WRAP certifications via issuing bodies |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Trading Company | Authentic Factory |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “import/export” or “trade” but not “manufacturing” | Includes “production,” “knitting,” “garment manufacturing” |
| Facility Photos | Limited or generic images; no machinery or production lines | Shows sewing lines, cutting tables, dyeing units, warehouse |
| Pricing Structure | Higher margins; less transparency on cost breakdown | Direct cost transparency (fabric, labor, overhead) |
| Lead Times | Longer due to coordination with third-party factories | Shorter, more accurate lead times (direct control) |
| MOQ Flexibility | Often higher MOQs due to subcontracting | Can offer lower MOQs, especially for in-house production |
| Communication | Limited technical knowledge; delays in production updates | Engineers or supervisors available for technical discussions |
| Website & Marketing | Focus on product catalogs and global shipping | Highlights factory size, equipment, certifications, R&D capability |
Pro Tip: Ask directly: “Do you own the production facility? Can I speak to your production manager?” Factories typically provide immediate access; trading companies may deflect.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Yoga Pants from China
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicative of substandard materials or labor violations | Benchmark against market rates; request fabric swatches and cost breakdown |
| Refusal to Provide Factory Address or Audit Access | Likely a trading company or non-compliant operation | Require third-party audit before PO |
| No Physical Address or Google Maps Inconsistency | High risk of fraud | Validate location via satellite imagery and on-site visit |
| Poor English or Inconsistent Communication | May signal lack of professionalism or hidden intermediaries | Use verified sourcing platforms or agents with local presence |
| Lack of Industry-Specific Certifications | Non-compliance with safety, labor, or environmental standards | Require OEKO-TEX, BSCI, or ISO 9001 before engagement |
| Pressure for Upfront Full Payment | High fraud risk | Use secure payment methods (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Generic Product Photos Only | May not control design or quality | Request custom samples with your branding and fabric specs |
4. Best Practices for Risk Mitigation
- Start with a Trial Order: Place a small MOQ (e.g., 500–1,000 units) to assess quality and reliability.
- Use Escrow or Letter of Credit (LC): Protect payments through secure financial instruments.
- Engage a Local Sourcing Agent: Leverage on-ground expertise for audits and negotiations.
- Sign a Quality Agreement: Define AQL standards, defect liabilities, and rework protocols.
- Conduct Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI): Mandatory for first and large orders.
Conclusion
Successful sourcing of adult yoga pants from China hinges on rigorous manufacturer verification and clear differentiation between factories and trading companies. Procurement managers must prioritize transparency, compliance, and operational due diligence. By applying the framework in this report, organizations can reduce supply chain risk, ensure product quality, and build resilient partnerships in the competitive activewear market.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Strategic Sourcing Partner for Global Brands
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT 2026
Strategic Sourcing Intelligence: Optimizing Apparel Procurement from China
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 Update
Why Your Current Sourcing Process for Yoga Pants is Costing You 220+ Hours Annually
Traditional sourcing for China adults yoga pants suppliers involves high-risk, time-intensive vetting of unverified manufacturers. Our 2025 benchmark study of 147 global apparel buyers revealed:
| Sourcing Method | Avg. Time to Qualified Supplier | Quality Failure Rate | Compliance Risk Exposure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct Alibaba Search | 8.2 weeks | 34% | High (68% non-compliant) |
| Trade Show Sourcing | 11.5 weeks | 22% | Medium (41% non-compliant) |
| SourcifyChina Pro List | 2.7 weeks | <5% | None (100% audited) |
Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Apparel Sourcing Efficiency Index (n=147 procurement teams)
3 Time-Saving Advantages of Our Verified Pro List for Yoga Pants Suppliers
- Pre-Validated Production Capabilities
Every supplier undergoes: - 12-point factory audit (ISO 9001, BSCI, OEKO-TEX®)
- Minimum 3-year financial stability verification
-
MOQ flexibility testing (as low as 500 units)
-
Zero-Risk Quality Assurance
- Dedicated QC teams embedded at all Pro List facilities
- 48-hour sample turnaround guarantee
-
Real-time production tracking portal
-
Accelerated Negotiation Framework
Pre-negotiated terms on: - FOB pricing (5-12% below market average)
- Lead times (22-35 days vs. industry 45-60)
- Payment terms (30% deposit standard)
“Using SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our yoga apparel sourcing cycle from 11 weeks to 18 days. We eliminated $220K in quality failure costs in Q1 2025.”
— Global Sourcing Director, Tier-1 US Activewear Brand (Confidential Client)
Your Strategic Next Step: Secure 2026 Supply Chain Advantage
With rising yarn costs (+17% YoY) and EU textile regulations tightening (EPR 2027), delaying supplier validation now risks Q4 2026 capacity shortages.
✅ Claim Your Verified Yoga Pants Supplier Shortlist
Contact our China-based sourcing specialists within 24 hours for:
– Free Pro List access with 3 pre-vetted suppliers matching your specs
– Custom MOQ/pricing analysis for 2026 volumes
– Risk assessment report for your target compliance standards
Act Before April 30, 2026:
首批15名咨询客户可获得2026年Q3产能优先锁定权
(First 15 inquiries secure Q3 2026 capacity priority)
CALL TO ACTION: ELIMINATE SOURCING DELAYS IN 72 HOURS
👉 Email: [email protected]
👉 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Include “YOGA2026” in your subject line to receive:
– Pro List access + 2026 Pricing Forecast Report ($1,200 value)
– Complimentary supplier negotiation playbook
Do not risk Q3 2026 production slots with unverified suppliers. Our 98.7% client retention rate proves verified sourcing isn’t optional—it’s your competitive necessity.
SOURCIFYCHINA | Your Objective Partner in China Sourcing Since 2018
Data-Driven. Risk-Averse. Operationally Transparent.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Unsubscribe policy available at sourcifychina.com/compliance.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
