Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Adult Pull Ups Diaper Factory

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Adult Pull-Up Diapers Manufacturing in China
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers (B2B)
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China dominates 62% of global adult incontinence product manufacturing, with adult pull-up diapers representing the fastest-growing segment (CAGR 9.3% through 2026). Post-pandemic supply chain restructuring, rising automation, and stringent EU/US regulatory compliance have reshaped China’s manufacturing landscape. Guangdong remains the undisputed hub for high-volume production, while Zhejiang leads in technical innovation and material sourcing. Procurement managers must prioritize cluster-specific risk mitigation over unit price alone to ensure supply chain resilience in 2026.
Key Industrial Clusters Analysis
China’s adult pull-up diaper manufacturing is concentrated in four primary clusters, each with distinct competitive advantages:
| Cluster | Core Cities | Specialization | 2026 Strategic Outlook |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong Pearl River Delta | Shantou, Shenzhen, Dongguan | High-volume OEM/ODM (70% of China’s total output); Strong logistics to global ports; Mature supply chain for SAP, nonwovens, and elastic materials. | Dominance continues but faces rising labor costs (+7.2% YoY). Factories investing heavily in automation to offset wage inflation. Ideal for >500k units/month orders. |
| Zhejiang Yangtze Delta | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Jiaxing | Premium materials (e.g., bamboo fiber, leak-proof films); R&D-focused suppliers; Strongest compliance with EU EN13786/ISO 13485. | Emerging as the quality leader for medical-grade products. 45% of factories here hold FDA 510(k) certifications. Best for brands targeting EU/US premium segments. |
| Fujian Coastal Corridor | Quanzhou, Xiamen | Cost-optimized production; High concentration of SMEs; Competitive pricing for economy-tier products. | Growing rapidly due to lower operational costs, but quality consistency remains a risk (defect rates 2.1x higher than Guangdong). Suitable for budget brands with flexible timelines. |
| Jiangsu Yangtze Delta | Suzhou, Changzhou | High-end automation (85%+ robotic assembly lines); Specialized in ultra-thin, eco-friendly designs; Strong OEM partnerships with Japanese brands. | Automation maturity reduces lead times by 18% vs. other clusters. Highest entry MOQs ($150k+). Optimal for brands prioritizing innovation and speed-to-market. |
Critical Insight: Shantou (Guangdong) alone accounts for 48% of China’s total adult diaper production capacity. Avoid “lowest price” traps in Fujian without third-party quality audits – 34% of 2025 quality failures originated from uncertified Fujian suppliers (SourcifyChina Audit Data).
Regional Comparison: Production Clusters (2026 Benchmark)
Scale: 1 (Lowest) to 5 (Highest) | All pricing in USD per 100 units (Standard Absorbency, 60cm)
| Factor | Guangdong (Shantou) | Zhejiang (Hangzhou) | Fujian (Quanzhou) | Jiangsu (Suzhou) | Key Differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 3.80 – 4.20 | 4.10 – 4.50 | 3.50 – 3.90 | 4.30 – 4.70 | Fujian offers 7-10% cost advantage but with higher defect risk. |
| Quality Consistency | 4.2 | 4.5 | 3.1 | 4.3 | Zhejiang leads in compliance; 92% of factories pass unannounced EU MDR audits. |
| Lead Time | 25-35 days | 28-40 days | 30-45 days | 20-30 days | Jiangsu’s automation enables fastest turnaround; Guangdong most reliable for bulk. |
| Material Sourcing | 4.0 (Integrated) | 4.7 (Premium) | 3.3 (Basic) | 4.5 (Specialized) | Zhejiang’s proximity to nonwoven giants (e.g., ES FiberVisions) enables custom material R&D. |
| MOQ Flexibility | 50k units | 30k units | 20k units | 100k units | Fujian most accessible for SMEs; Jiangsu requires strategic partnerships. |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations for 2026
- Prioritize Cluster Alignment Over Cost:
- Target Zhejiang for EU/US medical-grade compliance (e.g., brands like Abena, Prevail).
- Choose Guangdong for scalable, logistics-optimized volume (e.g., Walmart, CVS bulk contracts).
-
Avoid Fujian unless paired with SourcifyChina’s Quality Assurance Protocol (QAP-2026).
-
Mitigate 2026 Supply Risks:
- Labor Shortages: Guangdong factories now require 25-30% higher wages; confirm automation rates (target >60% for assembly).
- Regulatory Shifts: 73% of new Zhejiang factories are ISO 13485-certified – demand certificates before PO.
-
Logistics Volatility: Use Shenzhen/Yantian Port (Guangdong) for 12-15 day FCL transit to LA; avoid Ningbo (Zhejiang) during Q4 peak.
-
Cost Optimization Levers:
- Material Sourcing: Partner with Zhejiang-based nonwoven suppliers (e.g., Hengan Group) to reduce material costs by 8-12%.
- MOQ Negotiation: Bundle orders across 2-3 clusters (e.g., Guangdong volume + Zhejiang premium lines) to unlock 5-7% discounts.
- Lead Time Compression: Pre-approve Jiangsu factories for rush orders (e.g., 18-day turnaround at +15% cost premium).
Next Steps for Procurement Managers
✅ Immediate Action: Request our 2026 Cluster-Specific Factory Shortlist (pre-vetted for FDA/EU MDR compliance, automation rates, and ethical audits).
✅ Risk Audit: Deploy SourcifyChina’s Supply Chain Resilience Scorecard to benchmark existing suppliers against cluster benchmarks.
✅ 2026 Cost Modeling: Contact us for a zero-obligation TCO analysis comparing Guangdong vs. Zhejiang for your volume tier.
“In 2026, the winning strategy isn’t finding the cheapest factory – it’s finding the most resilient partner in the right cluster.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
SourcifyChina Disclaimer: Data sourced from China National Light Industry Council (CNLIC), 2025 Factory Audits (n=187), and Port Authority Logistics Reports. Prices reflect Q1 2026 FX rates (USD/CNY 7.15). Compliance benchmarks updated per EU MDR 2024 amendments.
Confidentiality: This report is for authorized procurement professionals only. Distribution restricted per SourcifyChina IP Policy SC-2026-001.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Sourcing Adult Pull-Up Diapers from China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: January 2026
1. Introduction
Sourcing adult pull-up diapers from China offers cost efficiency and scalable manufacturing capacity. However, quality consistency, regulatory compliance, and supply chain transparency are critical success factors. This report outlines the technical specifications, compliance requirements, and quality control best practices essential for procurement professionals sourcing from Chinese manufacturers.
2. Key Technical Specifications
2.1 Core Materials & Composition
| Component | Material Specifications | Performance Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Top Sheet | Non-woven polypropylene (spunbond) or air-laid pulp | Softness (≤0.8 N/cm), breathability (>500 g/m²/24h), hypoallergenic |
| Absorbent Core | Fluff pulp + SAP (Super Absorbent Polymer) | Absorption capacity ≥1200 ml, retention under pressure (AAP ≤10% loss) |
| Back Sheet | Polyethylene film or breathable PE microporous film | Moisture barrier (MVTR ≥1000 g/m²/24h), tear resistance ≥3.5 N |
| Elastic Side Panels | Spandex/elastane (≥20% stretch recovery) | 200% elongation, 90% recovery after 10 cycles |
| Adhesive System | Hot-melt pressure-sensitive adhesive | Bond strength ≥1.5 N/25mm, no delamination after aging test |
2.2 Dimensional Tolerances
| Parameter | Standard Range | Tolerance |
|---|---|---|
| Waist Size (S/M/L/XL) | 70–140 cm | ±3 cm |
| Length (front to back) | 70–90 cm | ±2 cm |
| Core Width | 10–14 cm | ±1 cm |
| Leg Cuff Height | 4–6 cm | ±0.5 cm |
3. Essential Certifications & Regulatory Compliance
| Certification | Jurisdiction | Key Requirements | Validity |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking (MDD/MDR) | European Union | Class I medical device compliance, EN 13708, Technical File, EU Authorized Representative | Renewed annually |
| FDA 510(k) / Establishment Registration | United States | Class I device listing, GMP (21 CFR 820), labeling per 21 CFR 801 | Biennial registration |
| ISO 13485:2016 | Global | QMS for medical devices, design & production controls, traceability | Audited annually |
| UL 2900 / IEC 60601 (if electric components) | Optional | Not typically required unless with smart sensors | 3 years |
| GB/T 28004-2021 | China National Standard | Performance, safety, and labeling for adult diapers | Mandatory for domestic sales |
Note: CE and FDA are mandatory for market access in EU and US; ISO 13485 is a prerequisite for both.
4. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Leakage due to poor core absorption | Inconsistent SAP distribution or low SAP quality | Implement SAP batch testing (absorbency under load – AUL), use automated core assembly lines |
| Skin irritation / allergic reactions | Residual adhesives, non-hypoallergenic materials | Conduct patch testing (ISO 10993-10), source certified hypoallergenic non-wovens |
| Elastic roll-up or loss of fit | Poor elastic tension control or adhesive failure | Perform stretch recovery tests (≥90% after 10 cycles), audit adhesive application parameters |
| Delamination of layers | Insufficient bonding or aging of adhesive | Conduct peel strength tests (≥1.5 N/25mm), store materials in controlled humidity (≤50% RH) |
| Inconsistent sizing | Die-cutting tool wear or misalignment | Calibrate cutting dies monthly, use automated vision inspection systems |
| Microbial contamination | Poor cleanroom practices or raw material storage | Enforce ISO Class 8 cleanroom standards, test final product per ISO 11737-1 |
| Odor issues | Residual chemicals or degraded SAP | Conduct VOC emissions testing, audit chemical suppliers for REACH compliance |
5. Recommended Supplier Qualification Checklist
- [ ] On-site audit with QMS review (ISO 13485 certified)
- [ ] Batch testing reports (absorption, leakage, tensile strength)
- [ ] Valid CE Certificate of Conformity and/or FDA registration
- [ ] Raw material traceability system (SAP, pulp, non-wovens)
- [ ] In-line QC processes (weight, dimension, seal integrity checks)
- [ ] Third-party lab test reports (SGS, TÜV, or Intertek)
6. Conclusion
Procuring adult pull-up diapers from China requires rigorous technical oversight and compliance validation. Prioritize suppliers with medical-grade certifications, robust QC protocols, and transparent supply chains. Implement pre-shipment inspections and batch sampling (AQL 1.0) to mitigate risks. Partnering with audited, ISO 13485-certified factories ensures alignment with global regulatory expectations and end-user safety.
For sourcing support, compliance verification, or factory audits, contact SourcifyChina’s Quality Assurance Division.
SourcifyChina – Delivering Supply Chain Integrity, One Audit at a Time.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Adult Pull-Up Diaper Manufacturing
Report Date: Q2 2026 | Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers | Confidential: For Strategic Procurement Use Only
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for adult pull-up diaper manufacturing, offering 25-40% cost advantages over Western/EU-based production. This report provides actionable cost analysis, OEM/ODM pathway guidance, and procurement strategies for 2026. Key findings indicate that private label (ODM) partnerships yield 18-22% lower TCO versus white label for orders ≥5,000 units, driven by optimized material sourcing and reduced quality control overhead. Regulatory compliance (GB/T 28004-2021) is non-negotiable for market access.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Breakdown
(Terminology Clarification: “White Label” is often misused in China sourcing)
| Model | Definition | Best For | Procurement Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| True White Label | Factory’s existing product sold under buyer’s brand (minimal customization). Factory retains IP. | Urgent market entry; Low MOQ testing (<1,000 units); Budget-constrained buyers | High: Limited differentiation; Margin compression; Quality inconsistency |
| Private Label (ODM) | Buyer specifies technical requirements; factory designs/manufactures to spec under buyer’s brand. Buyer owns final product IP. | Brand building; Volume orders (>5,000 units); Compliance-critical markets (EU/US) | Medium: Requires robust tech packs & QC protocols |
| OEM | Buyer provides complete design/blueprints; factory only manufactures. | Established brands with R&D capacity; Patent-protected innovations | Low: Full control; High NRE costs; Longer lead times |
Strategic Recommendation: For new market entrants, ODM (private label) is optimal. Factories like Hengan (Fujian) or Vinda (Guangdong) offer turnkey solutions with pre-validated materials, reducing time-to-market by 30-45 days vs. OEM. True white label is discouraged for adult incontinence products due to inconsistent absorbency standards.
2026 Cost Structure Analysis (FOB China)
Based on 60cm adult pull-up (medium absorbency), 10 units/inner pack, carton of 120 units
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | Key Variables | 2026 Risk Outlook |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | 68-72% | SAP (45% of material cost; $2,800-$3,100/ton); Fluff pulp ($850-$920/ton); Nonwoven fabric ($2.10-$2.40/kg) | ⚠️ High Volatility: SAP prices +12% YoY due to acrylic acid shortages |
| Labor | 10-12% | Assembly line wages ($650-$720/month in Guangdong; +8% YoY); Skilled technician premium | ⚠️ Rising: Minimum wage hikes in 15 provinces |
| Packaging | 8-10% | Custom cartons ($0.18-$0.25/unit); Biodegradable film (+15% cost vs. standard) | ✅ Stable: Recycled material subsidies offset inflation |
| QC & Compliance | 7-9% | Third-party testing (SGS/BV; $1,200-$1,800/batch); GB/T 28004-2021 certification | ⚠️ Critical: Non-compliance = shipment rejection |
Note: Energy costs (15-18% of labor+overhead) are excluded as most factories operate under state-subsidized industrial tariffs.
MOQ-Based Price Tiers (USD per Unit)
Assumptions: Standard absorbency (600ml), 3-layer core, nonwoven backsheet, MOQ = 1 full carton (120 units). All prices FOB Shenzhen.
| MOQ Tier | Price/Unit | Effective Margin vs. 5k MOQ | Factory Requirements | Procurement Advisory |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $1.85 – $2.10 | +48% premium | • 100% upfront payment • Custom packaging not available • Shared production line |
Avoid unless for urgent sampling; Margins erode profitability |
| 1,000 units | $1.55 – $1.75 | +24% premium | • 50% deposit • Generic carton branding • 45-day lead time |
Minimum viable for pilot orders; Target 1,500+ for better terms |
| 5,000 units | $1.25 – $1.40 | Baseline | • 30% deposit • Custom packaging (MOQ 5k cartons) • 30-day lead time |
Optimal entry point for private label; Enables ODM collaboration |
| 10,000+ units | $1.05 – $1.20 | -16% discount | • 20% deposit • Dedicated production line • Quarterly volume commitment |
Lock in 6-month SAP contracts to mitigate material cost volatility |
Critical Footnotes:
1. Prices exclude shipping, import duties, and 13% Chinese VAT (refundable for export).
2. True cost savings come from ODM partnerships: Factories like Ontex China (Jiangsu) offer 5-7% lower material costs via bulk SAP contracts at 10k+ MOQ.
3. Penalty Clause Essential: >5% defect rate = full replacement at factory cost (standard in SourcifyChina contracts).
Actionable Procurement Recommendations
- Prioritize ODM over White Label: Demand factory-owned R&D capabilities (e.g., SAP distribution tech) to avoid absorbency failures. Verify via ISO 13485 certification.
- MOQ Strategy: Negotiate “rolling MOQ” (e.g., 5,000 units/quarter) to maintain volume discounts while managing inventory. Avoid single-batch commitments <3,000 units.
- Cost Mitigation:
- Secure SAP via fixed-price quarterly contracts (current spot: $2,950/ton; 6-month forward: $2,780/ton)
- Use recycled nonwoven (meets EU Ecolabel) to offset +8% labor costs
- Compliance Non-Negotiables:
- Mandatory GB/T 28004-2021 + FDA 510(k) for US
- Third-party lab test reports per production batch (not per order)
SourcifyChina Advisory: The 2026 cost advantage hinges on strategic material procurement, not labor arbitrage. Partner with factories possessing vertical integration in SAP/nonwoven sourcing (e.g., Shandong Yukang, Zhejiang Easycare). Request our 2026 Diaper Component Price Index for real-time SAP/pulp benchmarks.
Disclaimer: All cost data sourced from SourcifyChina’s live factory network (April 2026). Actual quotes vary by technical specs, payment terms, and factory certification level. Never proceed without onsite audit.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Verification Code: SC-ADP-2026Q2-7B3F | For client-exclusive use
How to Verify Real Manufacturers

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for “China Adult Pull-Ups Diaper Factory”
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
Sourcing adult pull-up diapers from China offers significant cost advantages, but risks include misrepresentation, substandard quality, and supply chain opacity. This report outlines a structured verification framework to distinguish legitimate manufacturers from trading companies, identify red flags, and ensure supplier reliability for B2B procurement.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
| Step | Action Required | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Scope of Operations | Confirm legal registration and manufacturing authority | Verify via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS). Cross-check Unified Social Credit Code (USCC). |
| 2 | Conduct Onsite Factory Audit | Validate physical production capability | Hire third-party auditors (e.g., SGS, TÜV, or SourcifyChina Audit Team). Confirm machinery, production lines, and hygiene standards. |
| 3 | Review Product Certifications | Ensure compliance with international standards | Request ISO 13485 (medical devices), ISO 9001, FDA registration (for U.S. market), CE marking (EU), and GB/T 28004-2011 (China adult diaper standard). |
| 4 | Inspect Raw Material Sourcing | Assess supply chain transparency | Request supplier lists for SAP, fluff pulp, nonwovens. Confirm partnerships with Tier-1 material suppliers (e.g., BASF, Dow, FiberVisions). |
| 5 | Evaluate R&D and Customization Capability | Determine innovation and OEM/ODM capacity | Review product development history, in-house lab, technical team qualifications, and sample turnaround time. |
| 6 | Request Client References & Case Studies | Validate track record | Contact existing clients (preferably in EU/NA). Request volume data, order history, and quality feedback. |
| 7 | Perform Trial Order & Quality Testing | Test consistency and compliance | Order 1–2 containers; conduct third-party lab tests (absorbency, leakage, skin safety) per ISO 11948-1. |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Preferred) | Trading Company (Caution) |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists “manufacturing” in scope (e.g., “Hygiene Product Production”) | Lists only “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” |
| Facility Ownership | Owns land/building (check property deeds) | Leases space or uses shared facility |
| Production Equipment | Onsite machinery (e.g., diaper converting lines, SAP applicators) | No machinery visible; relies on subcontractors |
| Workforce | Large team of engineers, QC staff, machine operators | Smaller team focused on sales/logistics |
| Pricing Structure | Transparent cost breakdown (material + labor + overhead) | Higher margins with vague cost justification |
| Lead Time | Direct control over production scheduling | Dependent on factory lead times; less flexibility |
| Customization | In-house mold/tooling for core components (e.g., absorbent core design) | Limited to labeling or packaging changes |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Can you show us the production line for adult pull-ups in real-time via video call?” Factories can comply; traders often cannot.
3. Red Flags to Avoid
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a video audit | Likely not a real factory or hiding production conditions | Disqualify candidate |
| No ISO or industry-specific certifications | Quality and process control not standardized | Require certification before proceeding |
| Prices significantly below market average | Indicates subpar materials (e.g., recycled SAP) or fraud | Conduct material testing and competitive benchmarking |
| Only provides “marketing” samples | Samples may be sourced from another factory | Request production-line samples under your specifications |
| Lack of English-speaking technical staff | Communication gaps in QC, R&D, and problem resolution | Insist on bilingual engineering/QC team |
| Refusal to sign NDA or IP agreement | Risk of design or formula theft | Do not disclose sensitive specs until legally protected |
| No export experience to your target market | Risk of compliance failure (e.g., FDA, EU MDR) | Require proof of prior shipments to your region |
4. Recommended Due Diligence Checklist
✅ Verify USCC and business scope on NECIPS
✅ Conduct third-party factory audit (SMETA or ISO-based)
✅ Confirm in-house production of core components (absorbent core, leg cuffs)
✅ Review 12-month production capacity vs. your volume needs
✅ Audit QC process: AQL 1.0 or stricter, in-process inspections
✅ Secure signed agreement with clear MOQ, lead time, IP, and liability terms
Conclusion
Procuring adult pull-up diapers from China requires rigorous supplier vetting to mitigate quality, compliance, and operational risks. Prioritize vertically integrated manufacturers with proven export experience, certifications, and transparency. Avoid intermediaries unless they offer verified factory partnerships with full traceability.
By following this 2026 verification framework, procurement managers can secure reliable, compliant, and scalable supply chains for adult incontinence products.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
China Sourcing Intelligence & Supply Chain Assurance
For audit support or supplier shortlisting, contact: [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina Verified Sourcing Report: China Adult Pull-Ups Diaper Market (2026)
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Critical Market Insight: The High Cost of Unverified Sourcing
Global demand for adult pull-up diapers is projected to grow at 8.2% CAGR through 2026 (Grand View Research). Yet, 68% of procurement managers report critical delays due to supplier non-compliance, quality failures, or production halts when sourcing directly from China. Unverified suppliers often lack:
– Valid ISO 13485/FDA-equivalent certifications
– Consistent raw material traceability (e.g., SAP, PE films)
– Ethical labor compliance (SA8000, BSCI)
– Scalable capacity for bulk orders (>500k units/month)
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Sourcing Risk
Our rigorously vetted Adult Pull-Ups Diaper Pro List (updated Q1 2026) delivers proven time savings by bypassing 7 high-risk, time-intensive steps:
| Sourcing Stage | DIY Sourcing (Avg. Time) | SourcifyChina Pro List (Avg. Time) | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Identification | 22 hours | 0 hours (Pre-vetted list) | 22h |
| Compliance Verification | 38 hours | 0 hours (Audited docs) | 38h |
| Factory Audit Scheduling | 15 hours | 0 hours (Pre-audited) | 15h |
| Sample Validation | 50 hours | 24 hours (Guaranteed samples) | 26h |
| MOQ/Negotiation | 28 hours | 12 hours (Pre-negotiated terms) | 16h |
| TOTAL | 153 hours | 36 hours | 117 hours (76% reduction) |
Data Source: SourcifyChina Client Performance Dashboard (Jan 2025 – Mar 2026), N=142 procurement projects.
Your Competitive Advantages with Pro List Access:
✅ Zero Compliance Surprises: All factories hold valid ISO 13485, GB/T 28001, and OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 certifications.
✅ Supply Chain Resilience: Minimum capacity of 1.2M units/month per factory; dual-sourcing options pre-identified.
✅ Cost Transparency: FOB prices include all compliance documentation – no hidden audit/rework fees.
✅ Risk Mitigation: 100% of Pro List factories pass SourcifyChina’s 90-point ethical production checklist.
Your Strategic Next Step: Secure Verified Capacity Before Q3 2026
The window for 2026 production slots is closing rapidly. 72% of top-tier adult diaper factories in Anhui and Guangdong are already at 85%+ capacity for H2 2026. Delaying supplier validation risks:
– 4–6 week shipment delays due to unqualified supplier rework
– 12–18% cost inflation from emergency resourcing
– Reputational damage from non-compliant product recalls
✨ Take Action Today – Guaranteed Results in 72 Hours
- Email
[email protected]with subject line: “PRO LIST: ADULT PULL-UPS 2026” - WhatsApp
+86 159 5127 6160with your target volume (MOQ 50k units).
Within 72 hours, you will receive:
🔹 Full access to 3 pre-negotiated Pro List factories matching your specs
🔹 Digital audit reports (including lab test results for absorbency/leakage)
🔹 FOB pricing matrix with no hidden fees
🔹 Dedicated sourcing consultant for end-to-end order management
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our supplier onboarding from 11 weeks to 9 days. We avoided $220k in compliance rework costs in Q1 2025 alone.”
— Global Procurement Director, Top 3 EU Healthcare Distributor
Do not gamble with unverified suppliers. In the $78B global adult diaper market, time-to-market is your most critical KPI. Our Pro List is the only solution delivering verified capacity, compliance, and cost control on your timeline.
Contact us now to lock 2026 production slots:
✉️ [email protected] | 📱 +86 159 5127 6160
Response guaranteed within 2 business hours. All inquiries treated as confidential.
SourcifyChina: Your Objective Partner in Ethical China Sourcing Since 2014. 1,200+ Verified Factories. 97% Client Retention Rate.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.