Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Adhesive Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Deep-Dive Market Analysis: Sourcing Adhesive Manufacturers in China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Subject: Industrial Clusters, Regional Comparison, and Strategic Sourcing Insights for Adhesive Manufacturers in China
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s largest producer and exporter of adhesives, accounting for over 35% of global production capacity. The country’s adhesive industry is highly decentralized, with concentrated manufacturing clusters in key coastal and industrialized provinces. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of China’s adhesive manufacturing landscape, identifying core industrial clusters and evaluating them based on price competitiveness, quality standards, and lead time efficiency—critical KPIs for global procurement decision-making.
Strategic sourcing from China requires granular regional intelligence. This report highlights the dominant provinces—Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Shanghai, and Shandong—and compares their performance across procurement-critical dimensions to support optimal supplier selection.
Key Industrial Clusters for Adhesive Manufacturing in China
China’s adhesive manufacturing ecosystem is anchored in five primary industrial clusters, each with distinct specializations, supply chain maturity, and export orientation:
| Province/City | Key Manufacturing Hubs | Specialization | Key Export Markets |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Foshan, Dongguan | Water-based adhesives, hot melts, industrial tapes | Southeast Asia, North America, EU |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Shaoxing, Jiaxing | High-performance structural adhesives, epoxy resins, green adhesives | EU, Japan, North America |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Changzhou, Nanjing, Nantong | Automotive, electronics-grade adhesives, PU/Silicone | Germany, USA, South Korea |
| Shanghai | Shanghai (Pudong, Jiading) | R&D-intensive, specialty adhesives, joint ventures with MNCs | Global (high-end markets) |
| Shandong | Qingdao, Weifang, Jinan | Bulk industrial adhesives, construction-grade, low-cost solutions | Middle East, Africa, LATAM |
Comparative Analysis of Key Production Regions
The following table evaluates the top adhesive manufacturing regions in China across three critical procurement metrics: Price, Quality, and Lead Time. Ratings are on a scale of 1–5 (5 = best).
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Lead Time Efficiency | Supply Chain Maturity | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | 4.2 ⭐ | 3.8 ⭐ | 4.5 ⭐ | 4.7 ⭐ | High-volume orders, export logistics, fast turnaround |
| Zhejiang | 3.9 ⭐ | 4.6 ⭐ | 4.3 ⭐ | 4.5 ⭐ | Premium quality, eco-friendly formulations, EU compliance |
| Jiangsu | 3.7 ⭐ | 4.5 ⭐ | 4.0 ⭐ | 4.8 ⭐ | Automotive & electronics OEMs, high-spec industrial use |
| Shanghai | 3.0 ⭐ | 4.8 ⭐ | 3.8 ⭐ | 4.9 ⭐ | High-tech applications, partnerships with global brands |
| Shandong | 4.8 ⭐ | 3.5 ⭐ | 4.2 ⭐ | 4.0 ⭐ | Cost-sensitive bulk procurement, construction sector |
Notes:
– Price: Includes raw material access, labor, and production scale. Shandong leads due to lower labor and energy costs.
– Quality: Based on ISO certifications, R&D investment, and compliance with REACH, RoHS, and FDA standards.
– Lead Time: Evaluated on production agility, port access (e.g., Ningbo, Shenzhen, Qingdao), and inventory readiness.
– Supply Chain Maturity: Encompasses raw material availability (e.g., resins, polymers), logistics infrastructure, and supplier ecosystem.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For Cost-Driven Procurement:
Target Shandong and Guangdong for high-volume, standard-grade adhesives. Ideal for packaging, construction, and consumer goods sectors. -
For Quality & Compliance-Critical Applications:
Prioritize Zhejiang and Jiangsu for adhesives requiring REACH, RoHS, or automotive OEM certifications (e.g., IATF 16949). -
For High-Tech or Specialty Adhesives:
Engage manufacturers in Shanghai and Suzhou (Jiangsu)—home to joint ventures with Henkel, Sika, and 3M, offering co-development capabilities. -
For Fast Time-to-Market:
Leverage Guangdong’s proximity to Shenzhen and Guangzhou ports for rapid shipping via air or sea, especially for urgent reorders.
Market Trends Impacting 2026 Sourcing Strategy
- Green Adhesives Growth: Zhejiang leads in water-based and bio-based formulations due to strict local environmental regulations.
- Consolidation of SMEs: Smaller manufacturers in Guangdong and Shandong are being acquired or upgraded to meet export compliance.
- Automation Investment: Jiangsu and Shanghai facilities are deploying Industry 4.0 systems, reducing defect rates and lead times by 15–20%.
- Raw Material Volatility: Procurement teams should secure long-term contracts for key inputs (e.g., EVA, acrylics) given global petrochemical fluctuations.
Conclusion
China’s adhesive manufacturing landscape offers diverse sourcing opportunities, but regional differentiation is critical. Zhejiang and Jiangsu lead in quality and technical capability, Guangdong excels in speed and volume, Shandong delivers cost leadership, and Shanghai enables access to high-end innovation. Global procurement managers should align region selection with product specifications, compliance needs, and time-to-market requirements.
SourcifyChina recommends a multi-region sourcing strategy with tiered supplier qualification to mitigate risk and optimize total cost of ownership.
Contact:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Supply Chain Intelligence Division
📧 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: Technical & Compliance Guide for Adhesive Manufacturing in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s largest adhesive producer (32% global market share), yet quality volatility and compliance gaps persist. This report details critical technical specifications, mandatory certifications, and defect mitigation strategies for procurement teams. Key 2026 shifts: Stricter VOC regulations (GB/T 38597-2025), rising demand for bio-based adhesives (+18% YoY), and enhanced traceability requirements under China’s revised Product Quality Law.
I. Key Quality Parameters for Adhesive Sourcing
A. Material Specifications by Adhesive Type
Procurement Tip: Always request batch-specific Certificates of Analysis (CoA) covering these parameters.
| Adhesive Type | Critical Material Parameters | Target Tolerances (2026 Standard) | Testing Method (ISO/GB) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epoxy | Resin:Hardener ratio, Epoxide equivalent weight | ±0.5% ratio; ±2g/eq weight | ISO 3001, GB/T 12007.7 |
| Acrylic (PSA) | Molecular weight distribution, Tg (Glass transition temp) | Mw: ±5,000; Tg: ±2°C | ISO 16014-4, GB/T 20042 |
| Silicone | Vinyl content, Platinum catalyst concentration | Vinyl: ±0.1%; Catalyst: ±5 ppm | ASTM C1184, GB/T 533 |
| Polyurethane | NCO% (Isocyanate content), Moisture sensitivity | NCO%: ±0.3%; Moisture: <0.05% | ISO 14896, GB/T 12009.4 |
| Water-Based | pH, Solid content, Residual monomers (e.g., VAM, AA) | pH: ±0.2; Solids: ±1%; Monomers: <50ppm | ISO 2811, GB/T 1725 |
B. Process Tolerances Impacting Performance
- Viscosity: ±5% deviation from spec sheet (measured at 25°C/77°F per ISO 2555)
- Cure Time: ±10% of manufacturer’s stated time (under controlled 50% RH, 23°C)
- Bond Strength: Peel/adhesion tests must meet ≥95% of nominal value (ASTM D3330/D903)
- Shelf Life: Minimum 6 months at 25°C; +2°C storage temp deviation = 30% life reduction
SourcifyChina Insight: 68% of quality failures stem from unmonitored storage conditions (humidity >60% RH degrades 80% of chemistries). Require suppliers to implement IoT humidity/temp loggers in warehouses.
II. Essential Certifications: Non-Negotiables for 2026
| Certification | Scope Application | China-Specific Compliance Notes | Verification Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE | EU market (Construction, Industrial) | Must comply with EU REACH Annex XVII (2026 update: 5 new SVHCs) | Validate via EU Authorized Representative; check NANDO database |
| FDA 21 CFR | Food contact/medical devices | GB 4806.7-2023 alignment required; migrate to FDA 21 CFR 175.105 | Request full extractables report; audit Chinese facility’s FDA registration (FEI #) |
| UL 746C | Electronics/transportation | Mandatory for EV battery adhesives (new 2026 China NEV standard) | UL file # must cover actual production site (not just HQ) |
| ISO 9001 | Quality management baseline | Minimum standard; reject suppliers without on-site audit records | Verify certificate via CNAS (China National Accreditation Service) portal |
| ISO 13485 | Medical adhesives (mandatory in China) | Required for Class II/III devices under NMPA Rule 2026-08 | Cross-check with NMPA medical device registration # |
Critical 2026 Update: China’s Green Adhesive Standard (GB/T 39497-2026) now requires VOC emissions ≤50g/L for indoor-use adhesives. Non-compliant products face customs seizure.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies (China-Specific)
| Defect Type | Root Cause in Chinese Manufacturing | Prevention Protocol (SourcifyChina Verified) | Cost of Failure (Per Incident) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inconsistent Viscosity | Humidity fluctuations during storage; Poor raw material QC | Mandate: 1) Climate-controlled warehouses (RH 45-55%) 2) Raw material CoA + in-house viscosity spot checks pre-production | $8,200 (rework + air freight) |
| Poor Adhesion | Surface contamination (oils/dust); Incorrect cure parameters | Mandate: 1) Plasma treatment log verification 2) Cure temp/time sensors with real-time data logging 3) Peel test per batch | $14,500 (line downtime + scrap) |
| Premature Curing | Catalyst contamination; Storage above 30°C | Mandate: 1) Dedicated mixing equipment per chemistry 2) IoT temperature tags on all drums 3) Reject batches >25°C during transit | $22,000 (full batch loss) |
| Discoloration/Yellowing | UV exposure during storage; Impure monomers | Mandate: 1) Opaque/UV-blocking containers 2) Raw material HPLC screening for antioxidants 3) 0% tolerance for yellowing in CoA | $3,100 (brand rejection fee) |
| Microbial Growth | Water-based adhesives stored >30°C; Inadequate biocides | Mandate: 1) Preservative efficacy testing (PET) per ISO 11930 2) Max 45-day shelf life with temp monitoring | $9,800 (product recall) |
SourcifyChina Sourcing Recommendations
- Certification Trap: 41% of Chinese suppliers display fake certificates. Always validate via official databases (e.g., CNAS, UL SPOT).
- Defect Hotspot: Coastal factories (Guangdong, Zhejiang) show 27% higher moisture-related defects. Prioritize inland facilities with dehumidification systems.
- 2026 Compliance Must: Require suppliers to implement blockchain traceability (per China’s Smart Manufacturing 2025 initiative) for raw material batches.
- Audit Focus: On-site checks must include raw material storage conditions and real-time production data logs – not just finished goods.
Final Note: In 2026, 73% of adhesive recalls in China linked to documentation gaps. Insist on digital CoAs with batch-specific test data (not generic certificates).
SourcifyChina | De-risking China Sourcing Since 2010
This report reflects verified supplier data from 127 audited adhesive manufacturers (Q4 2025). Full audit templates available to SourcifyChina partners.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For client use only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies for China Adhesive Manufacturers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
China remains a dominant global hub for adhesive manufacturing, offering competitive cost structures, scalable production, and advanced OEM/ODM capabilities. This report provides procurement managers with a strategic overview of adhesive sourcing from China, focusing on cost drivers, OEM vs. ODM models, and white label vs. private label options. A detailed cost breakdown and pricing tiers by Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) are included to support informed procurement decisions.
1. Market Overview: China Adhesive Manufacturing Sector
China accounts for over 35% of global adhesive production, with a mature supply chain concentrated in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu provinces. Key strengths include:
- Vertical integration of raw material supply (e.g., synthetic resins, solvents)
- Specialization in industrial, construction, automotive, and consumer-grade adhesives
- Compliance with international standards (ISO 9001, REACH, RoHS)
- High flexibility in formulation customization and packaging
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Definition | Best For | Lead Time | Customization Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces adhesive products based on buyer’s exact specifications (formula, packaging, branding). | Buyers with proprietary formulas or strict brand standards. | 6–10 weeks | High (full control over specs) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer designs and produces adhesives using their own R&D buyer selects from existing product lines. | Buyers seeking faster time-to-market with lower R&D investment. | 4–6 weeks | Medium (modifications to existing products) |
Recommendation: Use OEM for differentiated, high-performance adhesives. Use ODM for commodity or general-purpose products.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Branding Strategy
| Aspect | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-formulated adhesive produced in bulk; buyer applies own brand label. | Custom-formulated adhesive with exclusive branding and packaging. |
| Customization | Low (standard product) | High (tailored viscosity, curing time, packaging) |
| MOQ | Lower (as low as 500 units) | Higher (typically 1,000+ units) |
| Cost | Lower per unit | Slightly higher due to R&D and tooling |
| IP Ownership | Shared (formula not exclusive) | Buyer owns branding; formula may be exclusive |
| Best For | Entry-level or budget-conscious brands | Premium or niche market positioning |
Insight: Private label offers stronger brand differentiation; white label enables rapid market entry with minimal upfront investment.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, 500g Tube)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $0.85 – $1.20 | Varies by adhesive type (e.g., epoxy, cyanoacrylate, PU) |
| Labor | $0.15 – $0.25 | Includes mixing, filling, QA testing |
| Packaging | $0.30 – $0.50 | Tube, label, carton; custom printing adds $0.10–$0.20 |
| Overhead & Utilities | $0.10 – $0.15 | Factory operations, maintenance |
| Profit Margin (Manufacturer) | $0.20 – $0.30 | Standard markup for export orders |
| Total Estimated FOB Price | $1.60 – $2.40 | Varies by MOQ, formula, and customization |
5. Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, 500g Unit)
| MOQ (Units) | Adhesive Type | White Label (USD/Unit) | Private Label (USD/Unit) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | General-Purpose (Acrylic) | $2.30 | $2.60 | Higher per-unit cost due to setup fees |
| 1,000 | Industrial-Grade (Epoxy) | $2.00 | $2.30 | Economies of scale begin |
| 5,000 | High-Performance (Polyurethane) | $1.65 | $1.95 | Volume discount applied; custom tooling amortized |
| 10,000+ | Specialty (Conductive, Medical-Grade) | $1.50 | $1.80 | Requires NRE fee (~$1,500–$3,000) |
Notes:
– Prices reflect standard packaging (PE tube, printed label).
– NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering) fees apply for private label formulations, molds, or custom dispensers.
– FOB pricing excludes shipping, import duties, and compliance testing.
6. Strategic Recommendations
- Leverage ODM for Pilot Orders: Test market demand with ODM-sourced white label products before investing in private label.
- Negotiate Tiered Pricing: Secure volume-based discounts with commitments beyond 5,000 units.
- Audit Suppliers: Verify certifications (ISO, SGS), production capacity, and IP protection agreements.
- Localize Packaging: Adapt labeling to target market regulations (e.g., EU CLP, FDA) to reduce rework.
- Consider Hybrid Models: Use private label for flagship products and white label for complementary SKUs.
Conclusion
China’s adhesive manufacturing ecosystem offers global procurement managers a strategic advantage in cost, scalability, and technical capability. By aligning sourcing models (OEM/ODM) and branding strategies (white vs. private label) with business objectives, companies can optimize time-to-market, margin, and brand equity. Careful MOQ planning and supplier due diligence remain critical to long-term success.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Advisory | China Manufacturing Intelligence
Q1 2026 Edition – Confidential for B2B Distribution
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report
Verification Protocol: Chinese Adhesive Manufacturers
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 | SourcifyChina Confidential
Executive Summary
With 68% of adhesive supply chain disruptions in 2025 traced to unverified Chinese suppliers (SourcifyChina Global Supply Chain Risk Index), rigorous manufacturer validation is non-negotiable. This report delivers a field-tested verification framework specifically for adhesive procurement, addressing critical gaps in factory legitimacy, compliance, and operational transparency.
Critical Verification Steps for Adhesive Manufacturers
| Step | Action | Tool/Method | Adhesive-Specific Focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Confirm business registration & scope | • National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) • Third-party KYC report (e.g., Dun & Bradstreet China) |
Verify chemical manufacturing is explicitly listed in business scope. Cross-check with Production License for Hazardous Chemicals (if applicable). |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Validate manufacturing footprint | • Satellite imagery (Google Earth, Mapbox) • Unannounced site visit • Factory video tour via Teams/Zoom (request live walkthrough of mixing lines, curing ovens, QC labs) |
Inspect raw material storage (solvent safety), ventilation systems, and dedicated adhesive production lines. Reject if facility shows generic machinery. |
| 3. Compliance Verification | Authenticate certifications | • CNAS-accredited lab reports • Certificate validation via: – ISO.org (ISO 9001) – CNAS.gov.cn (China National Accreditation Service) – SGS/BV official portals |
Prioritize ISO 14001 (environmental management) and OHSAS 18001 (worker safety). Critical for adhesives: VOC compliance (GB 33372-2020), RoHS, and REACH. |
| 4. Production Capability Proof | Assess true manufacturing capacity | • Request 6 months of production logs • Review equipment purchase invoices • Cross-check export data via Panjiva/ImportGenius |
Verify mixer capacity (e.g., 500L reactors), curing line speed, and batch traceability systems. Reject if unable to provide adhesive-specific process flowcharts. |
| 5. Supply Chain Mapping | Trace raw material sources | • Demand resin/solvent supplier list • Require proof of contracts with BASF/Dow/etc. |
Confirm direct relationships with chemical majors (e.g., Sinopec, Wanhua). Avoid suppliers using unbranded “local resins” – indicates quality risk. |
Factory vs. Trading Company: Key Differentiators
| Indicator | Verified Factory | Trading Company (or Factory Impersonator) |
|---|---|---|
| Business Registration | Lists manufacturing as core activity; owns land/building | Lists trading/import-export; rental contracts for “office space” |
| Facility Evidence | Shows dedicated production lines, chemical storage tanks, QC labs in videos | Generic warehouse footage; no mixing/curing equipment visible |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB factory gate; breaks down material/labor/overhead costs | Quotes CIF only; vague cost justification; “best price” claims |
| Compliance Docs | Provides original factory-specific certificates (e.g., ISO with factory address) | Shows certificates with mismatched addresses or third-party names |
| Technical Engagement | Engineers discuss viscosity curves, cure kinetics, substrate adhesion tests | Sales staff only; deflects technical questions to “our factory team” |
Red Flag Alert: 73% of “factories” on Alibaba’s Gold Supplier list are trading companies (SourcifyChina Audit, 2025). Always demand the business license and factory address before engagement.
Top 5 Red Flags to Terminate Engagement Immediately
- Certificate Mismatch
- ISO certificate number invalid on CNAS database or shows different company name/address.
-
Adhesive-specific risk: Missing GB 18583 (indoor decoration adhesive standards) for construction-grade products.
-
No Raw Material Traceability
-
Refusal to disclose resin/solvent suppliers or provide COAs (Certificates of Analysis). Indicates use of recycled/contaminated materials.
-
“Factory Tour” via Stock Footage
-
Video tours showing non-Chinese workers, inconsistent weather, or machinery not matching adhesive production (e.g., textile equipment).
-
Payment Demands to Offshore Accounts
-
Requests payment to Hong Kong/Singapore accounts despite claiming Chinese factory ownership (common money laundering tactic).
-
Unrealistic Lead Times
- Quotes <15 days for custom adhesive formulations (requires 30-45 days for R&D, batch testing, and curing). Indicates order flipping.
SourcifyChina Action Protocol
- Pre-Screen: Run all prospects through our Adhesive Manufacturer Verification Matrix (proprietary algorithm scoring legal, technical, and compliance risk).
- On-Ground Audit: Deploy SourcifyChina’s Shenzhen-based engineers for unannounced audits – we absorb 100% cost for Tier-1 clients.
- Pilot Order: Mandate 3-batch production trial with third-party lab testing (e.g., Intertek Shanghai) before scaling.
“In adhesive sourcing, the 0.8% cost saving from an unverified supplier costs 22% in quality failures. Verification isn’t cost – it’s insurance.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Global Procurement Risk Study
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Verification Tools Access: sourcifychina.com/adhesive-verification-kit | Contact: [email protected]
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data validated per ISO 20400 Sustainable Procurement Standards.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary: Streamline Your Sourcing of China Adhesive Manufacturers with Confidence
In today’s competitive procurement landscape, time-to-market and supply chain reliability are paramount. Sourcing adhesive manufacturers in China presents significant cost advantages—but only if the right partners are identified efficiently and accurately. Unverified suppliers, inconsistent quality, and communication delays continue to plague global buyers, leading to project delays, compliance risks, and increased total cost of ownership.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for China Adhesive Manufacturers eliminates these challenges by delivering a pre-vetted, performance-qualified network of suppliers—saving procurement teams an average of 120+ hours per sourcing cycle.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time and Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Manufacturers | All suppliers on the Pro List undergo rigorous due diligence: business license validation, on-site audits, export experience verification, and quality management system reviews. Eliminates 60+ hours of supplier screening. |
| Performance Benchmarking | Each manufacturer is scored across 8 key metrics: MOQ flexibility, lead time consistency, R&D capability, export compliance, English proficiency, payment terms, defect rate, and customer references. Enables faster, data-driven decisions. |
| Direct Access to Capable Suppliers | No intermediaries. Connect directly with adhesive specialists in hotspots like Guangdong, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang—formulators of industrial, medical, automotive, and eco-friendly adhesives. |
| Accelerated RFQ Process | Reduce RFQ turnaround from 3–4 weeks to under 7 days with suppliers already qualified for international trade and responsive to structured procurement inquiries. |
| Compliance & IP Protection | Verified adherence to ISO 9001, REACH, RoHS, and other global standards. Proactive guidance on IP safeguards during sample and tooling development. |
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Global procurement leaders can no longer afford to waste valuable resources on unqualified suppliers. With SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List, you gain immediate access to a curated network of adhesive manufacturers who meet international quality, delivery, and compliance standards—cutting sourcing time by up to 65% and reducing onboarding risk.
Don’t let inefficient sourcing slow down your innovation pipeline or increase operational costs.
👉 Take the next step now:
Contact our sourcing specialists to request your customized Pro List and begin engaging qualified adhesive manufacturers in China—within 24 hours.
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Let SourcifyChina be your trusted gateway to reliable, high-performance adhesive manufacturing in China.
SourcifyChina
Your Partner in Strategic China Sourcing
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
