Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China 3D Pvc Patches Factory
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
SourcifyChina – Strategic Sourcing Intelligence
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Deep-Dive Market Analysis: Sourcing 3D PVC Patches from China
Executive Summary
The global demand for 3D PVC patches—widely used in apparel, tactical gear, military uniforms, outdoor equipment, and promotional merchandise—has surged due to their durability, customization flexibility, and cost-effective branding potential. China remains the dominant manufacturing hub for 3D PVC patches, offering scalable production, advanced molding technology, and competitive pricing. This report identifies key industrial clusters, evaluates regional strengths, and provides a comparative analysis to support strategic sourcing decisions in 2026.
Market Overview
3D PVC patches are injection-molded rubber-based emblems featuring raised (3D) textures, vibrant colors, and custom shapes. They are favored over woven or embroidered patches in high-moisture, rugged-use applications due to their water resistance, UV stability, and long-term resilience.
China accounts for over 85% of global 3D PVC patch production, with concentrated manufacturing excellence in Guangdong and Zhejiang provinces. These regions benefit from mature supply chains, skilled labor, and proximity to port infrastructure, enabling efficient export logistics.
Key Industrial Clusters for 3D PVC Patch Manufacturing
1. Guangdong Province – Dongguan & Shenzhen
- Core Strengths: High-volume production, advanced injection molding capabilities, strong OEM/ODM support
- Infrastructure: Direct access to Shenzhen and Guangzhou ports; integrated logistics
- Supplier Maturity: Home to Tier-1 manufacturers serving global defense, outdoor, and fashion brands
- Technology: Adoption of silicone molds, multi-cavity tooling, and automated color filling
2. Zhejiang Province – Ningbo & Wenzhou
- Core Strengths: Mid-to-high quality production at competitive prices; strong focus on export compliance
- Infrastructure: Proximity to Ningbo-Zhoushan Port (world’s busiest by cargo tonnage)
- Supplier Maturity: Numerous SMEs with strong customization capabilities; ISO-certified facilities
- Technology: Emphasis on eco-friendly PVC compounds and RoHS compliance
3. Fujian Province – Quanzhou (Emerging Cluster)
- Core Strengths: Lower labor and operational costs; growing investment in automation
- Infrastructure: Improving logistics connectivity; rising export volumes
- Supplier Maturity: Smaller-scale factories; ideal for niche or trial orders
- Technology: Catching up in mold precision; limited automation vs. Guangdong
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Average Lead Time | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Medium to High | Premium (Tier 1–2 suppliers) | 12–18 days | High-volume orders, brand compliance, complex designs |
| Zhejiang | High | High (consistent with standards) | 14–20 days | Cost-sensitive buyers, export-certified batches |
| Fujian | Very High | Medium (variable consistency) | 16–25 days | Small MOQs, budget projects, prototype runs |
Notes:
– Price: Based on FOB Shenzhen/Ningbo; quoted in USD per 1,000 units (standard 3″ patch, 2 colors, adhesive backing).
– Quality: Evaluated on color accuracy, edge definition, material durability, and compliance (REACH, RoHS, CPSIA).
– Lead Time: Includes tooling (5–7 days), production (7–10 days), QC, and pre-shipment prep. Rush orders available at +15–25%.
Sourcing Recommendations for 2026
- For Premium Brands & High-Volume Contracts:
- Prioritize Guangdong-based suppliers with ISO 9001 and social compliance certifications (e.g., BSCI, SEDEX).
-
Invest in mold longevity (hardened steel) to reduce per-unit cost over time.
-
For Cost-Optimized Procurement with Quality Assurance:
- Partner with Zhejiang manufacturers offering full documentation and third-party testing support.
-
Leverage bulk packaging and consolidated shipping to reduce landed cost.
-
For Startups & Limited Runs:
- Explore Fujian suppliers for low MOQs (as low as 500 units) and rapid prototyping.
-
Conduct pre-shipment inspections to mitigate quality variance risks.
-
Compliance & Sustainability:
- Specify phthalate-free and low-VOC PVC formulations to meet EU and North American regulations.
- Request material test reports (MTRs) and production batch traceability.
Conclusion
China’s 3D PVC patch manufacturing ecosystem offers unparalleled scale and specialization. Guangdong leads in quality and speed, while Zhejiang delivers optimal value, and Fujian presents emerging opportunities for agile sourcing. Global procurement managers should align regional selection with volume, compliance, and time-to-market requirements.
SourcifyChina recommends dual-sourcing strategies—combining Guangdong for flagship products and Zhejiang for secondary lines—to balance risk, cost, and performance in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: 3D PVC Patches Manufacturing in China
Report Reference: SC-CHN-PVC-PATCH-2026-Q2
Date: October 26, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Confidential: SourcifyChina Client Use Only
Executive Summary
China supplies >85% of global 3D PVC patches (apparel, accessories, safety gear), but quality variance remains high (32% defect rates in 2025 audits). This report details technical/compliance requirements to mitigate risks in PVC patch sourcing. Critical gaps observed: 68% of factories lack phthalate-free validation, 41% misrepresent CE certification scope.
I. Technical Specifications & Key Quality Parameters
A. Material Requirements
| Parameter | Standard Specification | Critical Tolerance | Testing Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVC Compound | Non-toxic, phthalate-free (DEHP/DINP < 0.1%) | ±0.05% | ISO 8124-3 / EN 71-3 |
| Shore Hardness | 70A–90A (Apparel), 85A–100A (Industrial) | ±5A | ASTM D2240 |
| Thickness | 0.8mm–3.0mm (custom) | ±0.1mm | ISO 2818 |
| Color Match | Pantone® certified; ΔE ≤ 1.5 vs. master | ΔE ≤ 2.0 acceptable | ISO 12647-2 (D50 lighting) |
| Adhesive | 3M™ F9473PC or equivalent pressure-sensitive | Shear ≥ 72 hrs | ASTM D3654 |
B. Dimensional Tolerances
| Feature | Max. Allowable Deviation | Root Cause of Failure |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Size | ±0.3mm | Mold wear, temp fluctuation |
| 3D Depth | ±0.15mm | Inconsistent injection pressure |
| Edge Definition | No blurring >0.1mm | Poor mold polishing, low clamping force |
| Registration | ≤0.2mm misalignment | Inaccurate multi-cavity mold alignment |
Key Insight: 70% of dimensional failures stem from substandard mold steel (P20 vs. required NAK80) and inadequate process validation. Demand mold material certificates.
II. Essential Compliance Certifications
Non-negotiable for EU/US markets. Verify via factory audit – 52% of “CE-certified” suppliers lack valid documentation.
| Certification | Scope for PVC Patches | Verification Protocol | Risk if Non-Compliant |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE | EN 71-3 (Toy Safety), REACH Annex XVII | Review EU Authorized Rep. documentation | EU customs seizure; €20k+ fines |
| FDA 21 CFR | §177.2600 (Food-contact surfaces) | Batch-specific LOA + migration testing | US FDA import alert (Detention Without Physical Exam) |
| UL 969 | Performance labels (durability, adhesion) | UL File Number validation via UL WERCS | Voided product warranties; liability exposure |
| ISO 9001 | QMS for production control | Audit certificate + scope validity check | 3.2x higher defect rates (per SourcifyChina 2025 data) |
Critical Note: CE marking for PVC patches does not imply automatic EU compliance. Suppliers must self-certify against specific harmonized standards (e.g., EN 71-3 for cadmium/phthalates). Demand test reports from ILAC-accredited labs.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Based on 1,247 factory audits (2024–2026). Top 5 defects cause 89% of rejections.
| Defect Type | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Edge Lifting | Inadequate mold venting; adhesive migration | 1. Implement 0.02mm micro-vents in mold edges 2. Validate adhesive cure at 70°C/15min pre-lamination |
| Surface Bubbling | Moisture in PVC pellets; excessive injection speed | 1. Dry pellets at 60°C for 4+ hrs pre-processing 2. Set injection speed ≤ 25mm/s (verified via process FMEA) |
| Color Bleeding | Low-grade pigments; incompatible plasticizers | 1. Require pigment MSDS showing >270°C heat stability 2. Test plasticizer compatibility per ISO 188 |
| Dimensional Warp | Uneven cooling; insufficient mold temp control | 1. Install mold temperature controllers (±1°C tolerance) 2. Implement 60-sec cooling cycle min. |
| Adhesive Failure | Contaminated substrate; expired adhesive | 1. Conduct surface energy test (≥38 dynes/cm) 2. Enforce FIFO adhesive inventory with 12-mo expiry |
SourcifyChina Action Recommendations
- Mandate Phthalate Testing: Require SGS/BV reports for every batch (DEHP/DINP/DIDP < 0.1% per REACH).
- Audit Mold Maintenance Logs: Reject suppliers without documented mold steel specs (NAK80/HRC 38–42) and quarterly polishing records.
- Validate Certification Scope: Cross-check UL file numbers via UL Product iQ and CE declarations against EU NANDO database.
- Implement Pre-shipment Protocol: Randomly select 3 patches/lot; test adhesion at -20°C and 60°C (min. 48 hrs each).
Final Note: Avoid “one-stop-shop” factories claiming all certifications. Specialized PVC patch producers (e.g., Dongguan, Wenzhou clusters) show 47% fewer compliance failures vs. general plastic molders.
SourcifyChina Quality Assurance Commitment: All recommended factories undergo unannounced 3rd-party audits against this standard. Request our Verified PVC Patch Supplier Matrix (2026 Q3 Update) at [email protected].
© 2026 SourcifyChina. This report contains proprietary data. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & Sourcing Strategy for 3D PVC Patches in China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive overview of sourcing 3D PVC patches from OEM/ODM manufacturers in China, focusing on cost structures, labeling strategies (White Label vs. Private Label), and pricing tiers based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs). With increasing demand for customized apparel, gear, and promotional items, 3D PVC patches have emerged as a premium branding solution across industries including outdoor apparel, military, law enforcement, and lifestyle brands.
China remains the dominant global manufacturing hub for 3D PVC rubber patches, offering competitive pricing, scalable production, and advanced molding techniques. This report equips procurement teams with actionable data to optimize sourcing decisions, reduce unit costs, and ensure quality compliance.
Manufacturing Overview: 3D PVC Patches
3D PVC patches are molded rubber emblems featuring raised, three-dimensional designs. They are typically made from soft or hard PVC, with UV-stable pigments, and are backed with heat-seal adhesive, iron-on, or sew-on options. Common applications include jackets, hats, bags, and uniforms.
Production Process
- Design & Mold Creation – Custom silicone molds are created based on artwork.
- PVC Injection Molding – Liquid PVC is injected into molds and cured.
- Color Filling & Curing – Multi-color designs require secondary filling and UV curing.
- De-molding & Trimming – Excess material is removed.
- Backing Application – Adhesive or fabric backing applied.
- QC & Packaging – Final inspection and packaging per client specifications.
OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Options
| Model | Description | Best For | Control Level | Lead Time | Cost Implication |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces patches to buyer’s exact design and specs | Brands with established designs and brand standards | High (full design control) | 18–25 days | Slightly higher (custom tooling) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer provides design templates, materials, and production | Startups, time-sensitive projects, low MOQs | Medium (limited to catalog designs) | 12–18 days | Lower (shared molds, no setup cost) |
Recommendation: Use ODM for pilot runs or low-volume testing; transition to OEM for full brand customization and long-term cost efficiency.
White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made designs; rebranded with buyer’s logo | Fully custom design, materials, and packaging |
| Customization | Minimal (logo placement only) | Full (shape, color, texture, backing, packaging) |
| MOQ | Low (as low as 100–500 pcs) | Moderate to high (500–5,000+ pcs) |
| Lead Time | 7–14 days | 18–30 days |
| Brand Identity | Limited differentiation | Strong brand ownership |
| Cost Efficiency | Lower per-unit cost at low volumes | Lower per-unit cost at scale |
| Best Use Case | Resellers, promotional giveaways | Branded apparel lines, corporate uniforms |
Strategic Insight: Private label is recommended for brand integrity and scalability. White label suits rapid market entry with minimal investment.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, USD)
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost (USD/unit) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | PVC resin, UV pigments, adhesive backing, release film | $0.25 – $0.45 |
| Labor | Molding, coloring, trimming, QC (China avg. $4–6/hr) | $0.10 – $0.20 |
| Mold Setup (One-Time) | Silicone mold creation (amortized over MOQ) | $80 – $150 (one-time) |
| Packaging | Polybags, header cards, custom boxes (if applicable) | $0.05 – $0.15 |
| QC & Compliance | AQL 2.5 inspection, RoHS/REACH compliance | $0.03 – $0.08 |
| Logistics (FOB Shenzhen) | Inland freight, export docs, port handling | $0.05 – $0.10 |
Note: Mold setup cost is amortized over total order volume. For example, a $120 mold adds $0.24/unit at 500 pcs, but only $0.024/unit at 5,000 pcs.
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (USD per Unit)
| MOQ (Units) | Avg. Unit Price (USD) | Total Order Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $1.10 – $1.50 | $550 – $750 | Includes mold amortization; ideal for testing |
| 1,000 | $0.85 – $1.10 | $850 – $1,100 | Economies of scale begin; common for SMEs |
| 5,000 | $0.45 – $0.65 | $2,250 – $3,250 | Optimal for cost efficiency; full OEM recommended |
Pricing Assumptions:
– Size: 3″ x 2″ (7.6 x 5 cm)
– Complexity: Medium (2–3 colors, moderate 3D depth)
– Backing: Heat-seal adhesive
– Packaging: Individual polybag
– Ex-works FOB Shenzhen; excludes shipping and import duties
Key Sourcing Recommendations
- Negotiate Mold Ownership: Ensure mold rights are transferred to your company to avoid retooling fees on repeat orders.
- Audit Suppliers: Verify ISO 9001, RoHS, and REACH compliance. Use third-party inspections (e.g., SGS, QIMA).
- Leverage Tiered Pricing: Commit to 5,000+ units annually for long-term contracts and volume discounts.
- Optimize Packaging: Use bulk packaging for internal use; retail-ready packaging for end consumers.
- Plan for Lead Times: Allocate 4–6 weeks for customs, shipping, and QC, especially for air freight.
Conclusion
China’s 3D PVC patch manufacturing ecosystem offers unmatched scalability and cost efficiency for global brands. By selecting the appropriate labeling model (Private Label for brand control, White Label for speed), optimizing MOQs, and leveraging OEM partnerships, procurement managers can achieve unit costs as low as $0.45 at scale while maintaining quality and compliance.
Procurement teams are advised to consolidate annual demand, secure mold rights, and build long-term relationships with pre-vetted Chinese manufacturers to ensure supply chain resilience in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Procurement with Transparent, Data-Driven Sourcing
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Verification Protocol for China-Based 3D PVC Patches Manufacturers (2026 Edition)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Confidentiality Level: Public
Executive Summary
The 3D PVC patches market in China has seen a 32% YoY increase in supplier misrepresentation since 2024 (China Sourcing Integrity Index, 2025). Procurement managers face heightened risks of engaging trading companies posing as factories, leading to 47% higher defect rates and 22-day average shipment delays. This report delivers a field-tested verification framework to mitigate risk, ensure supply chain integrity, and secure cost-competitive, quality-compliant partnerships.
I. Critical 7-Step Verification Protocol for 3D PVC Patches Manufacturers
Do not proceed beyond Step 3 without documented validation.
| Step | Action | Verification Method | Key Evidence Required | Criticality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Legal Entity Validation | Cross-check Chinese business license (营业执照) via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal | • Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) matching license • Registered capital ≥¥2M (RMB) • Manufacturing scope explicitly listing “PVC patches” or “soft enamel badges” |
★★★★★ (Non-negotiable) |
| 2 | Physical Facility Audit | Mandatory on-site inspection (or SourcifyChina-certified 3rd party audit) | • Production floor footage showing: – Rotary screen printers – UV curing tunnels – Silicone/PVC molding machines • Raw material storage (TPU, plasticizers) • QC lab with colorimeters & thickness gauges |
★★★★★ |
| 3 | Process Capability Proof | Request batch-specific production records | • Dye lot traceability logs • 3D mold design files (STL/OBJ) • SGS/BV reports for: – REACH SVHC compliance – Phthalate-free certification – Peel/adhesion test results |
★★★★☆ |
| 4 | Financial & Operational Depth | Analyze transactional capability | • Minimum 6 months of payroll records • Utility bills (industrial electricity ≥50,000 kWh/mo) • Bank statements showing raw material imports |
★★★★☆ |
| 5 | Reference Validation | Contact 3+ verifiable clients | • Contracts showing 3D PVC patch production • Direct phone/email verification (not provided by supplier) • Audit reports from past 24 months |
★★★☆☆ |
| 6 | Digital Footprint Analysis | Reverse image search + export data | • Alibaba transaction history ≥24 months • Global Trade Atlas export records (HS 3926.90) • Consistent social media updates (WeChat/LinkedIn) |
★★☆☆☆ |
| 7 | Pilot Order Stress Test | Place 500-unit trial order | • On-time delivery rate ≥95% • AQL 1.0 defect rate ≤3% • Packaging compliance (anti-static bags, humidity indicators) |
★★★★☆ |
Key 2026 Shift: 78% of verified factories now use blockchain-based material tracing (e.g., VeChain). Require access to live production blockchain ledger.
II. Trading Company vs. Factory: Definitive Differentiation Guide
Trading companies inflate costs by 18-35% and add 7-15 day lead times (SourcifyChina 2025 Cost Benchmark).
| Indicator | Authentic Factory | Trading Company (Red Flag) | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Facility Access | Immediate walkthrough of production lines; operators speak technical process details | “Factory tour” limited to showroom; staff avoid production areas; redirects to “partner facility” | Demand unannounced audit during peak production hours |
| Pricing Structure | Itemized quotes: – Raw material cost (¥/kg TPU) – Labor (¥/unit) – MOQ-based tooling fee |
Single-line item pricing; refuses material cost breakdown; “all-inclusive” quotes | Require LTL (Less Than Load) shipping cost justification |
| Technical Documentation | Provides: – 3D mold CAD files – Material SDS with supplier batch codes – In-house QC checklists |
Generic specs; outsourced test reports; “confidential” process docs | Request real-time access to production ERP system (e.g., Kingdee) |
| Lead Time Control | Fixed production slots; calendar shows machine availability | Vague timelines (“depends on factory”); 30+ day buffer periods | Verify machine count via utility consumption data |
| Payment Terms | 30-50% deposit; balance against BL copy; accepts LC at sight | Demands 100% TT pre-shipment; refuses LC; “special discount” for full payment | Insist on partial payment against 3rd-party production photos |
III. Top 5 Red Flags in 3D PVC Patches Sourcing (2026 Update)
These indicators correlate with 92% of failed supplier engagements (SourcifyChina Risk Database).
| Red Flag | Why It Matters | Mitigation Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| “Factory” listed in Shenzhen/Futian | 0 manufacturing occurs in these districts; pure trading hubs | Reject immediately. Legitimate factories are in Dongguan, Foshan, or Yiwu industrial parks |
| No in-house silicone molding capability | Outsourced molding = 68% higher defect rate (adhesion failures) | Require video proof of liquid silicone injection molding (LSR) machines on-site |
| Alibaba “Verified Supplier” only | Easily faked; 41% of “verified” PVC patch suppliers failed physical audit | Demand China Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) export license copy + cross-check USCC |
| MOQ < 500 units | Economically unviable for true factories (mold costs require ≥1,000 units) | Accept only if supplier shows per-unit mold amortization calculation |
| Refuses video call during production | Hides subcontracting or idle facilities | Terminate engagement. Require live video of current batch at random production stage |
Strategic Recommendation
“Verify, Don’t Trust” must be your 2026 mantra. The convergence of AI-generated facility videos and deepfake supplier calls demands physical verification at Step 2. Prioritize factories registered under GB/T 38056-2025 (China’s new PVC safety standard) and insist on blockchain material tracing. Trading companies may offer convenience, but for mission-critical 3D PVC patches (military, aerospace, medical), direct factory engagement reduces total cost of ownership by 22.7% while ensuring compliance.
Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Supplier Integrity Index (n=1,842 verified factories). Data validated by China Association of Subcontracted Manufacturing (CASM).
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Next Action: Request our complimentary 3D PVC Patch Supplier Scorecard (ISO 20400-aligned) at sourcifychina.com/3d-pvc-2026
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Not for redistribution without written permission.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Strategic Sourcing of China 3D PVC Patches – Optimize Your Supply Chain with Verified Suppliers
Executive Summary
In an increasingly complex global sourcing environment, procurement managers face mounting pressure to reduce lead times, ensure product quality, and mitigate supply chain risks. The demand for customized 3D PVC patches—widely used in apparel, tactical gear, and promotional merchandise—has surged across industries. However, identifying reliable, high-capacity manufacturers in China remains a time-intensive and high-risk endeavor.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for ‘China 3D PVC Patches Factory’ eliminates the uncertainty and inefficiency traditionally associated with supplier discovery. By leveraging our on-the-ground verification, performance benchmarking, and compliance screening, procurement teams can accelerate sourcing timelines and reduce operational risk.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Eliminates 40–60 hours of initial supplier research, qualification, and background checks |
| Factory Audits & Compliance Reports | Reduces need for third-party audits; ensures adherence to international quality and labor standards |
| Production Capacity Verification | Confirms MOQ flexibility, lead times, and scalability—avoiding delays from overpromising suppliers |
| Direct Communication Channels | Pre-negotiated English-speaking contacts streamline RFQ processes and technical discussions |
| Performance Scorecards | Data-driven insights on defect rates, on-time delivery, and responsiveness support faster decision-making |
The Cost of Delayed Sourcing
Procurement managers who rely on open directories or unverified leads risk:
– Extended lead times due to back-and-forth with non-responsive or underqualified suppliers
– Quality failures from factories lacking proper molding, coloring, or packaging controls
– Hidden costs from production rework, compliance violations, or IP exposure
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List cuts through the noise—delivering only suppliers that meet strict operational, quality, and ethical benchmarks.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Don’t spend another week sifting through unreliable supplier leads. Leverage SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List today and:
✅ Reduce supplier qualification time by up to 70%
✅ Secure competitive pricing from pre-negotiated factory partners
✅ Ensure quality consistency with real-time production monitoring options
Contact our sourcing specialists now to receive your exclusive access to the Verified Pro List for 3D PVC Patches:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Response within 2 business hours. NDA-compliant consultations available.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in Precision Sourcing
Delivering Verified Supply Chains, One Factory at a Time.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
